HomeMy WebLinkAbout100615 LAC MinutesMINUTES OF THE LAKES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
June 15, 2010
The Lake Advisory Committee (LAC) Meeting was called to order at 4:30
P.M. Members present: Donna Mankowski (Vice Chair), Dan O'Keefe,
Char Jasan, Tom Voll, and Liz Weninger.
Others present: Mike Myser (City Council Liaison) Ross Bintner (Water
Resources Engineer)
CALL TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. There were no minutes to approve.
III. OLD BUSINESS
A. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System/Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Program (MS4 SWPPP) Public Hearing
PLSLWD Water Resources Management Plan update
Bintner talked about the permit requirements for the following
agencies: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP),
Municipal (MS4), State General Permit to Discharge Stormwater
associated (Permit), and Minimum Control Measure (MCM).
Bintner noted that in 2009, the City focused on the relationship
between regulation and water quality utility and that in 2010, the
this presentation is focusing on the legal side of the permits and
their relationship to the water quality utility program. The City's
goal is to embrace utility management in the future, the
effectiveness of the system, and the overall cost efficiency of it. He
commented about partnering with the watershed, the county, the
township and neighboring cities to align each entity's educational
and financial resources to help achieve this goal. He explained that
by protecting water quality we are actually protecting the health and
welfare of the general public.
WENINGER MOTIONED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING,
SECOND BY O'KEEFE. APPROVED 5-0.
There were no comments from the public.
WENINGER MOTIONED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING,
SECOND BY JASON. APPROVED 5-0. THE PUBLIC HEARING
WAS CLOSED.
Weninger asked about the grass clippings and other debris that is
going into our lakes and wetlands while Scott County is mowing the
boulevards on county roads. She said that is going against
everything that the LAC is trying to achieve. She also questioned
whether Scott County could stop using sand/salt on icy winter
roads. Mankowski suggested that discussion should also be
opened with the State of Minnesota about applying sand/salt on TH
13.
Mike Myser (City Council Liaison) said that he has met with Scott
County representative, Gary Shelton and Commissioner Barb
Marschall regarding using other alternatives to sand/salt.
Mankowski questioned whether the City's parks maintenance crews
have been informed about not cutting grass too short and what they
were doing with the grass clippings. She suggested that the Prior
Lake Association could write a general article about mowing and
grass clippings for Lake Smarts.
Bintner said that partnering in education with the various agencies
is the real key to controlling water quality whether it is through
community events, signs, pamplets, the website, etc.
Voll brought up the Dive the Lake Program. He suggested that
pictures of the amount of garbage that was brought out of the
bottom of the lake in early June be posted on the City's website and
in the local paper so residents to see the amount of junk that was
retrieved from the lake.
B. Street Sweeping - Bintner gave an update on the 319 Clean Water
Grant project. The City is partnering with the University of
Minnesota on this study and will analyze the water quality benefit
received from regular street sweeping that picks up leaves, sand,
phosphorous and other debris before heading into the storm water.
C. Iron Enhanced Sand Filtration Study - Bintner gave an update
explaining with the tests will take place.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS -- Dive the Lake Update
Mankowski said that this was the fifth year that LAC sponsored the Dive
the Lake program. There were 29 divers and they filled up a 5 yard
2
dumpster with various items (eg. anchors, the bottom of a fish house, a
boat lift cover, fishing poles, pipes, etc.
V. STAFF UPDATE
A. 2009 Water Quality Pond Maintenance, Project #09-013 Update -
Bintner noted that in 2009 the City did maintenance on six ponds at
a total cost of approximately $133,000.00. Those projects are now
completed.
B. 2011 Water Quality Maintenance and Retrofit Project #11-012
Update - The 2011 project is in the planning stages. The City
Council gave their approval to begin surveying and testing.
Surveyors will do wetland delineations, testing for contamination,
etc at six pond sites. Plans should be finalized by late summer and
the project will be bid sometime in Nov/Dec. The contractor will
begin work around January.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
Mankowski talked about zebra mussels in Prior Lake. She said that
Gary Montz, Microbiologist with the DNR will be surveying the lake
in the late summer or early fall to check the increase of the zebra
mussel population. Mankowski noted that residents can help the
DNR by informing them when they notice zebra mussels attached
to their boats, boat lifts or docks. Bintner suggested linking the
DNR's phone number to the homepage of the City's website so
residents can report findings directly to the DNR.
VII. JASAN MADE A MOTION TO AJOURN, SECOND BY WENINGER.
APPROVED 5-0. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 7:51 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Ross Bintner
Water Resources Engineer
3
Ross Bintner
~m: Ross Bintner
~ent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:48 PM
To: 'Char Jasan'; Charlotte Green; 'Dan O'Keefe'; 'Donna Mankowski'; 'Harry Alcorn'; 'James
Streefland'; 'Liz Weninger'; Michael T. Peterson; MikeMyser; 'Stacy Sass'; 'Tom Voll'
Subject: June 15 LAC Meeting.
Attachments: 2009SWPPPWQ.pdf; 2010-06 agenda.pdf
LAC,
Attached is the SWPPP presentation materials and Agenda for our meeting next week (June 15). I look forward to your
questions and guidance on how we manage the Water Quality Utility & SWPPP.
Is there any other items we should add? I think a Dive the Lake update may be in order!
Remember, we will be holding a public hearing. I've condensed the format from the LAC bylaws and copied it below:
1. The presiding officer announces the agenda item that is the subject of
the public hearing.
2. Staff and/or a consultant make a presentation or report on the subject
matter of the public hearing.
3. At the conclusion of any presentation or remarks by Staff and/or a
consultant, the presiding officer asks the Lakes Advisory Committee
members if they have questions of the Staff or consultant.
The presiding officer requests a motion and second from a member of
the Lakes Advisory Committee to open the public hearing and calls for
a vote.
5. The presiding officer declares the public hearing opened, announces
the time and then proceeds to ask for citizen input, comments and
questions.
6. Members of the public, interested parties or their authorized
representatives may address the Lakes Advisory Committee
orally.
7. After all persons have been heard, the presiding officer will ask twice
whether there are any other persons in attendance who want to be
heard on the matter pending.
8. LAC motion and second to close the public hearing.
9. The Lakes Advisory Committee addresses the subject matter through
deliberation. The Lakes Advisory Committee may ask questions of
the Staff.
~~ [~~t~~ Ross T B3ntt~er, P.E,
W~ter Resaurees Engineer
~ ~, P; 9~2,~47,5$3 t
v ~ ~; ~52 2~2 ~t}8U
F: 9~~.~4~}.~i2~5
~ ~, E: r~i~niner,'a e~t~r~~nriarlake cc~~~
~`'~n-~ts°~ `vti~: h('n~;r•rr,+:~a; ~it~'ofn'iorl3ke c~m~t4'aFerResourc~s shin:!
6/15/2010
Stor
Abbreviations
~,
• SWPPP-StormwaterPollutionPrevention
\ Program
•~dVIS4 - Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
• MPCA - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
-•--Permit-State General Permit to Discharge
tormwater associated w/ MS4
CM - Minimum Control Measure
,~~r~
Minimum Control Measures
~,~
MCM 1- Public Education and Outreach
MCM 2 - Public Participation
MCM 3- Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
l'MCM 4- Construction Site Stormwater Runoff
Cdntrol
MCM 5- Post Construction Runoff Control
_MCM 6- Pollution Prevention / Good Housekeeping
~is for 2009 reporting period: Relationship between
~~~ gulation and water quality utility.
6/15/2010
Why Water Quality?
~~~~ The relationship between the MS4/SWPPP and the
Water Quality Utility:
~1. Citizen's Ethic of Environmental Stewardship: 2030 Vision and
~ Strategic Plan - We care about our lakes, and they are a
valuable asset to the community, worth protecting.
2. Protect Public Health and Safety: Wellhead Plan and Surface
Water Plan - Water quality affects the health of the public.
3_..__MakesEconomicSense: ReducefutureliabilityfromTMDL&
ANTIDEGRADATION requirements. Less cost for trunk system.
,~ `Doingthe right thing all along is cheaper in the end!
. Follow Local, State and Federal Requirements: Watershed
plans, NPDES/MS4 permits- We have to do it anyways.
~S~ ,
,: ,,p : ' ~ ,i ;: .~~ ~ ¢ ~
~ tu , ~ ~ . : .y_ ,..; t ;
~ . i
.; r The ~J~t~~ Qiuality gQal-rs -~
F •
~
tA/- k~ ~~Y•~ ~ ~' .
~`~fN; e,~~~/~ aq ,q ,~t
~~~~: ~ ~ ~ ._.. ~ .
a`~ =~° y
+ e ".
~~~ . .~' ~ . ~ ~e,
k, ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x
~
s~ ~ :¢~~ ~x~ '
'?~,~o . ~: `~ 9~~~ ":
~ ~ ~ 5D°lo ~
r ~~%' ` V~~'~ a(~:.
~ ~
,~~,. ~~ ~.>. ~wr;; ~'~~.., i
~ ~¢ "~ t»~.~~~P~~ ~.~,
~~ Changin~* UVeilhea
A, .
, ;,~
_...
_:..~
2
6/15/2010
How do we meet our Water Quality goal,
-~~ ~' and who is going to help!?
• Urban: Water quality treatment systems
\ - Structura1:135 Ponds, 300+ sedimenttrap manholes, 35
\ alternative systems such as: Infiltration and bioretention,
~ Created wetlands, Rain Gardens,.
~* Non-Structural: Intensive Street Sweeping, Construction
`ESC, Homeowner education, source controls.
• In-Lake: Invasive species management, Other?
• Rural: Septic maintenance, source controls.
Agricultural: Buffers, Drain tiles, Fertilizer use, production
" do we compare BMPS "Apples to Apples?"
How do we focus on overall cost efficiency of the system?
,5~~
r~'Water Quality Utility - Cost Efficiency:
Doing More for Less.
• GOALS: Focus ac[ivities to target Required Level of Service,
Reduce Average Treatment Cost, Promote cross sector
~collaboration so the next taxpayer dollar spent goes into the
most efficient practice possible.
• Dollars per pound phosphorus per year ($/Ib P-Yr)
• Dollars per ton sediment per year ~$/TS-Yr)
~- Urban 8MP Cost Examples:
?~•"~Ponds 5100-$500/Lb P-yr
'"~~~~~3weeping $10-$50/Lb P-yr
- ConstructionESC$10-5000/LbP-yr
~`~~SedimeM trap manholes $300-900/Lb P-yr
~~~~~~ ~Privatelandownereducation$P
Examples of value created by using a data-driven system.
What is Cross Sector Collaborotion & Who do we need to work witht
3
6/15/2010
Subwatershed Marginal Cost
Efficiency Analysis
Dollars: Costs of the practice = size, material, land use, ease
of access, hourly labor rate, complexity of construction or
maintenance.
Per Ib P: Watershed pollutant loading rate = land use, soils,
slopes, tree cover, human sources. Efficiency of practice.
Per Year: Design life, annual maintenance needs.
-- ~ $150/IbP-Yr...._.,.... ~
-~~ ~ YZ .
4 ~7~$~ - Yr
$450 / Ib P - Yr ~^-~---._ ; /~ -
3 '-
~IbP-Yr
4
6/15/2010
#:
r ^R, 'r'.. .~}+~~ '
~~8~~
~~
'~
~~
~
~
~
~
t~3
~
``~~
u
,t'
'
~
'
wk
.., ~ rr~ ':..r ~, ~f .
/, .
y.; .~ -
.
~
. _
/ ,~ = f .-' ~
"
F~ ~ ~~ ~ _-° -
_ .
~ r
-~,~~ ~ . ~
_
~ .
~
~
~~'o~`~ F 4 ~ .
µ
. ..
. ~-
'
4
`~`-±
i
' ~'
^
a
y
,:
,
~
.
„ ~yp
'k.i'S ca,~rl ¢ .
1 y~ _?`
e
:T ,
,
~ '
_
~ ~.
:~ .
~
~
~` d~~~ +.L~;~
~ ~~ ~
! .
X '«
1 S <`"
a
~~ :Y
:~~..
~, _
Y~. - '
5
6/15/2010
~~ost Efficiency, Decision Making Needs &
Partnerships.
Need Partnership
1. Ne easy-to-use asset management, 1. County, Watersheds, Neighboring
data collection, data srorage and water Cities or Townships.
quatiry accounting systems.
2. Need to use best science to inform 2. Watersheds, University and Regulatory
decision making process. Agencies.
eed to allgn regulation with water 3. Watersheds, University and Regulatory
quality outcomes and budgetary
ities Agencies.
.
"~~ water quality forum and credit
4. Watersheds, RegulatoryAgencies,
roker to trade cross sector.
~ Townships, Private land owners.
;
6