HomeMy WebLinkAbout0513022.
3.
4.
A.
5.
A.
Bo
Co
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
MONDAY, MAY 13, 2002
Fire Station - City Council Chambers
6:30 p.m.
Call Meeting to Order:
Roll Call:
Approval of Minutes:
Consent Agenda:
Case #02-029 Steve Mosey Variance Resolution.
Public Hearings:
Case #02-026: BluffHeights Apartments is requesting a Conditional Use Permit
to develop a 49-unit apartment building on 3.62 acres of vacant land located on
the north side of Franklin Trail, east of Highway 13 and west of Bluff Heights
Trail.
Case #02-045: Shamrock Development is requesting an Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to change the designation from Community Retail Shopping
(C-CC) to Residential - High Density (RHD) for the vacant land located on the
west side of CSAH 83, south of CSAH 42 and north of The Wilds.
Case #02-044: Shamrock Development is requesting to amend the Zoning
Ordinance to reclassify Hass Lake as a Recreational Development Lake and to
rezone the adjacent 20 acres from the A (Agriculture) District to the R-1 (Low
Density Residential) District.
Cases #02-055 (Rezoning); #02-038 (PUD Amendment); #02-039 (Preliminary
Plat); and 02-048 (Vacation) Wensmann Homes have submitted applications for
an amendment to the Wensmann 1st Addition PUD Plan and a preliminary plat.
This proposal adds 0.53 acres of the Kuper property, located along the east side of
Wensmann 2na Addition, to the existing PUD. The plan extends the private street
and adds 4 townhouse units to the PUD plan. The vacation application is to vacate
the existing drainage and utility easement over Lot 39.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02l~agenda~AG051302.DOC
16200 Ea§le Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. Old Business:
Ao
Case File #02-013 (continued) Tom Holme Construction, Inc. is requesting
consideration of a preliminary plat named Red Cedar Heights consisting of 4.34
acres to be subdivided into 7 lots for single family residential development. The
property is located on the northeast side of Mushtown Road, west of Toronto
Avenue and Overlook Drive.
7. New Business:
A. Case #02-043 The City of Prior Lake is requesting to vacate a drainage and utility
easement on part of Lot 1, Block 2, Waterfront Passage Addition.
8. Announcements and Correspondence:
9. Adjournment:
L:\O2FlLES\O2planning comm\O2pcagenda'xAG051302. DOC
PUB LIC HEAR.IN G
Conducted by the Planning Commission
The Planning Commission~J~lcomes your comments in this matter. In fairness to all who
choose to speak, we ask that, after speaking once, you allow everyone else to speak
before you address the Commission again and limit your comments to clairification or
new information. Please be aware this is the principal opportunity to provide input
on this matter. Once the public hearing is closed, further tesitmony or comment will
not be possible except under rare conditions. The City Council will not hear
additional testimony when it considers this matter. Thank you.
ATTENDANCE - PLEASE PRINT
NAME ADDRESS
~1~1
PHLIST.DOC PAGE I
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MONDAY, MAY 13, 2002
1. Call to Order:
Chairman Stamson called the May 13, 2002, Planning Commission meeting to order at
6:31 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Atwood, Criego, Lemke, Ringstad and
Stamsort, Community Development Director Don Rye, Planning Coordinator Jane
Kansier and Recording Secretary Connie Carlson.
2. Roll Call:
Atwood Present
Criego Present
Lemke Present
Ringstad Present
Stamson Present
Approval of Minutes:
The Minutes from the April 22, 2002, Planning Commission meeting were approved as
presented.
4. Consent:
A. Case #02-029 Steve Mosey Variance Resolution.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 13, 2002,
on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
The Resolution is consistent with the Planning Commission's direction for the denial of 9
variances for the construction of an entryway, garage and room addition to an existing
single family dwelling. On April 29, 2002, the applicant submitted to staff a letter dated
4/27/02 as notice of appeal to the City Council of the Planning Commission's decision to
deny the above described variances as requested by the applicant. The appeal is
scheduled for heating before the City Council on May 20, 2002.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY ATWOOD, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 02-
005PC DENTYING A 24-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 1-FOOT FRONT SETBACK; A
3.58-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SUM OF SIDE YARDS OF 11.42-FEET; 5.9-FOOT
VARIANCE TO BUILDING SEPARATION OF 9.1-FEET; A 4.7-FOOT AND 5-FOOT
VARIANCE TO PERMIT AN EAVE/GUTTER ENCROACHMENT IN FRONT AND SIDE
LOT LINES; A 6-FOOT AND 2.18-FOOT VARIANCE FOR BUILDING WALLS OVER 50-
FEET LONG; A 3.7-FOOT AND 4-FOOT VARIANCES TO PERMIT A DRIVEWAY WIDTH
AND SETBACK TO A FRONT AND SIDE LOT LINES.
Vote taken indicated ayes by Criego, Atwood and Stamson. Nays by Ringstad and
Lemke. MOTION CARRIED.
L:~02FILES\02planning eomm\02pcminutcs~lN051302.doc 1
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
5. Public Hearings:
Commissioner Stamson read the public hearing statement.
A. Case #02-026: Bluff Heights Apartments is requesting a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a 49-unit apartment building on 3.62 acres of vacant land located
on the north side of Franklin Trail, east of Highway 13 and west of Bluff Heights
Trail.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 13, 2002,
on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
Bluff Heights Apartments, Limited Partnership, represented by Gregory McClenahan, has
filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a multifamily dwelling
on the property located on the north side of Franklin Trail, east of TH 13 and west of
Bluff Heights Trail. The plan proposes 49 units on a total of 3.62 acres. The property is
zoned R-4 (High Density Residential) and is guided as R-HD (Urban High Density) on
the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. Multi-family dwellings require a CUP within
the R-4 Zoning District.
Staff recommended the Planning Commission continue this matter and direct the
developer to provide the necessary additional information. In order to allow the
developer time to submit this information, and the staff the time to review it, the item
should be continued to June 10, 2002.
Atwood questioned buffer yards. Kansier explained the differences between B & C
bufferyards and briefly explained screening requirements.
Criego questioned the allocation for parks or playgrounds. Kansier said the land is not
being platted and therefore not required. The applicant does show a small playground
and a trail around the pond.
Comments from the public:
Applicant Greg McClenahan, representing Bluff Heights Apartments, said he does not
have any problems with continuing the matter to June 10, as they are working on staff's
conditions. The City Engineer is reviewing the storm water plans. The plan was to
satisfy the 60% exterior materials requirements. McClenahan explained they were
looking into a part stucco and brick building material, landscaping and bufferyard,
lighting, garage setback and park requirements.
Criego questioned if there was adequate space for children in the development.
McClenahan said it was similar to other projects he has built in Scott County. He felt the
project was family oriented with a demographic of 1.9 children per household. There
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes'uMN051302 .doc 2
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
would be a game room, tot lot, pedestrian path and picnic shelter on the property. He felt
they have done a fair job in addressing the recreation area for children.
Irene Mangan, 4810 Bluff Heights Trail, stated her major concern is the population of the
building. Another concem is the drainage runoff. The area already has several existing
wet areas. She questioned who will take responsibility for the problems. Mangan
pointed out the drainage from this project running into their parking lot. Safety is an
issue with the busy comer and heavy traffic.
Walter Hriber, 4818 Franklin Trail, said a big issue is the existing water problems. The
project needs to be tiled. Another concem is to have the developer install a fence to keep
the kids from running into their property.
Greg McClenahan said they did hold an informational meeting and discussed putting up a
fence along the boundaries and they would be more than willing to do so. He also
addressed the neighbor's drainage concems.
The hearing was closed at 7:00 p.m.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Criego questioned Kansier on the existing water problems on the adjacent parcel.
Kansier explained the City is concemed with mnoffproblems.
Ringstad said the drainage concerns are legitimate. The engineering department can
address this issue at the next meeting.
MOTION BY RINGSTAD, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO CONTINUE THE MATTER
TO JUNE 10, 2002.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
B. Case #02-045: Shamrock Development is requesting an Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to change the designation from Community Retail Shopping
(C-CC) to Residential - High Density (RHD) for the vacant land located on the west
side of CSAH 83, south of CSAH 42 and north of The Wilds.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 13, 2002,
on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
Shamrock Development has filed an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
for the property located on the south side of CSAH 42, east of CSAH 83 and north of The
Wilds. The proposal is to amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from the
current C-CC (Community Retail Shopping) designation to the R-HD (High Density
Residential) designation on approximately 20 acres of vacant land.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminuteshMN051302.doc 3
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2O02
This property is presently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and C-4 (General
Business) and is designated as C-CC (Community Retail Shopping) on the 2020
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. At this time, the applicant is planning to develop
this entire 70 acre property to the east and the west of this site. The proposed
development would include single family lots to the east, commercial lots to the west,
and a townhouse style development on the area in question.
Staff recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan as requested.
Comments from the public:
Nick Polta, Engineer for Pioneer Engineering represented Shamrock, presented the
preliminary development plan. The idea was to get the land use changed to know how to
proceed in platting future development. Criego questioned what plans for high density.
Polta responded maybe a variety of mix.
The public hearing was closed at 7:11 p.m.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Criego:
· This use is appropriate for the property. It should be changed to High Density.
· Recommended the City look at other areas for commercial property.
Lemke:
· Agreed with Criego, it is a good use of the property.
Atwood:
· Questioned the difference between neighborhood retail and community retail.
Kansier explained the uses and limitations.
· Concerned community retail is on the outside perimeters of County Roads 42 and 83
with the surrounding residential area.
· Stamson said the remaining strip of property would be a buffer between the districts.
Ringstad:
· Agreed, this change makes sense.
Stamson:
· Concurred with the Commissioners. Looking at the applicant's diagram, they took
into account they would be able to develop commercially under the balance of the
property.
· Supported request.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY ATWOOD, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL
OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE R-HD DESIGNATION.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02peminutesLMN051302.doc 4
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This item will go before the City Council on June 3, 2002.
C. Case #02-044: Shamrock Development is requesting to amend the Zoning
Ordinance to reclassify Hass Lake as a Recreational Development Lake and to
rezone the adjacent 20 acres from the A (Agriculture) District to the R-1 (Low
Density Residential) District.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 13, 2002,
on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
Shamrock Development and Wesley Langhoffhave filed an application for a Zone
Change for the property (20.04 acres) located on the south side of CSAH 42,
approximately ½ mile east of CSAH 83 and directly west of Hass Lake. The request is to
rezone the property from the A (Agricultural) District to the R-1 (Low Density
Residential) District, and to change the designation of Hass Lake from a Natural
Environment Lake to a Recreational Development Lake.
The DNR has met with the developer and the staff to discuss the proposed
reclassification. In his letter dated April 2002, Pat Lynch, Area Hydrologist, is generally
supportive of this reclassification, based on the understanding the area directly adjacent
to the lake will be preserved and be dedicated to the City. This dedication would be
accomplished at the time of platting.
The Planning staff recommended approval of the Zone Change and the reclassification of
Hass Lake as proposed. Staff finds the proposed R-1 district consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposed classification of Hass Lake to a
recreational development lake is also justified based on the existing development
surrounding the lake, the availability of public sewer and water services, and the abutting
major arterial roadway.
Atwood questioned the classification of the lake by today's regulations. Kansier
responded it would most likely be classified as a recreational lake.
Comments from the public:
Nick Polta of Pioneer Engineering represented the applicant, pointed out one of the
recommendations from Pat Lynch, Area Hydrologist from the DNR, was the separation
of lots on the lake. The developer designed the plan around their (DN-R's) concerns.
Tom Chaklos, 3161 140th Street, Shakopee, stated he owns the majority of land around
Hass Lake. He said it bothered him the City wants to make this change and never even
talk to the people who own the property. Chaklos said his property was changed from
Agriculture to Lakeshore Development according to Scott County, because that is what is
in their plat book. Now Prior Lake is going to change the lake designation and not even
L:\O2FI LES\02planning comm\O2pcminutesWIN051302.doc 5
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
consult with the property owners. Although he is for the change, he felt the Planning
Commission should have the input from the people affected by it. Stamson explained
that was why the City holds public hearings. Chaklos said he did receive a Notice but
felt he should have some input without a public hearing. He felt The Wilds has been
screwed up twice with City ordinances. Problems with the past City Council destroyed
the original plan. The new City Council should be aware of the problems. Chaklos is for
the change only because it will increase the value of his property. His land is still zoned
Agriculture. Chaklos has talked to the developer and has received more information from
him than the City. When the City misuses the ordinance the residents pay the price. If
this lake is changed to a recreational lake it is open to the public. Do people have access
to use his property to get to the lake?
Stamson responded the change of the designation does not affect the surrounding land in
such a way that anyone would have access. It would not change the use of the lake. It is
recognition from the DNR for what types of uses surrounding the lake can be used for.
Chaklos said a boat was in the lake and the only way to it was through his property or
The Wilds. He owns almost 40 acres.
Criego asked Chaklos to point out his property boundaries. Choklas responded. He is in
favor of the applicant's request.
The hearing was closed at 7:30 p.m.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Lemke:
· Agreed with staff and supported both requests.
Atwood:
· Questioned the allowances for natural versus recreational lake uses. Kansier said
there is really no change. A public access would be determined as part of the plat.
There would be limited access. The lake is not that big and will probably not
accommodate boats. Maybe a dock to fish could be put in.
· Questioned the boundaries. Kansier pointed out the boundaries.
· Supported staff's recommendations.
Ringstad:
· Supported both requests. The designation of the natural environment lake was done
several years ago and clearly the community has changed since that designation.
· The property is surrounded by R1 property and it makes sense to change.
Criego:
· Agreed with Ringstad.
· Recommend the applicant pay particular attention to the DNR's recommendations to
protect the bluff as well as the trees.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminuteshMN051302.doc 6
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
Stamson:
· Agreed with Commissioners and supported both requests.
It is important to keep in mind in changing the designation of the lake does not
change the use of the lake. The surrounding use of the land is effected.
· The lake designation has changed over the years.
· The change to R-1 is appropriate.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY RINGSTAD, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST TO THE R-1 DISTRICT ON 20.04 ACRES.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY RINGSTAD, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING HASS
LAKE TO A RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LAKE.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This matter will go before the City Council on June 3, 2002.
D. Cases//02-055 (Rezoning);//02-038 (PUD Amendment);//02-039
(Preliminary Plat); and 02-048 (Vacation) Wensmann Homes have submitted
applications for an amendment to the Wensmann 1st Addition PUD Plan and a
preliminary plat. This proposal adds 0.53 acres of the Kuper property, located along
the east side of Wensmann 2na Addition, to the existing PUD. The plan extends the
private street and adds 4 townhouse units to the PUD plan. The vacation application
is to vacate the existing drainage and utility easement over Lot 39.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 13, 2002,
on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
Wensmann Realty, Inc., has applied for approval of a development to be known as
Wensmann 3ra Addition on the property located north of CSAH 82, west of Fox Tail Trail
and Wensmann 2nd Addition. The application includes the following requests:
· A rezoning of approximately 0.53 acres from the R-1 (Low Density Residential)
district to the R-2 (Low to Medium Density Residential) district;
· An amendment to the Wensmann 1st Addition Planned Unit Development Plan;
· A Preliminary Plat;
· The vacation of the existing drainage and utility easement over Lot 39, Block 1,
Wensmann 2nd Addition.
The proposal adds 0.53 acres to the east side of the existing PUD, extends the private
streets and adds 4 townhouse units to the existing development.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutesWIN051302.doc 7
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
The proposed rezoning, PUD amendment, preliminary plat and vacation are consistent
with the existing development of Wensmann 1st. The staff therefore recommends
approval, subject to the following conditions:
The resolution vacating the easement will not be recorded until the final plat of
Wensmann 3rd has been approved and signed by the City.
Provide an irrigation plan for the new area.
Address the following Engineering issues in the final plat plans:
a. For all watermains the depth of cover shall be a minimum of 8' to top of pipe and
maximum of 10' of cover. Also 10' of horizontal separation shall be provided
from other parallel utility alignments.
b. Note to provide a minimum of 18" vertical separation for all watermain crossings
with sanitary sewer.
c. Check the sanitary service invert elevations for Lots 3 and 4. Does the
documented building elevation justify the sanitary service invert elevation depth
being greater than 10' for Lot 1 ?
d. Minimum grade for sanitary service stubs shall be ¼" per foot (2%).
e. Delete or verify curb & gutter detail on page 4 meet the requirements of City of
Prior Lake Public Works Design Manual Plate # 507 on page 8.
f. Signature of company responsible for erosion and sediment control plan
preparation, implementation and maintenance.
g. Extend existing 2'contour lines a minimum of 200' beyond the property boundary
to accurately depict the existing drainage patterns.
h. Note for all silt fence to be installed by the contractor and inspected by the City
prior to any site work.
i. Delete or verify silt fence detail on page 5 meet the requirements of City of Prior
Lake Public Works Design Manual Plate # 602 on page 8.
Slopes greater than or equal to 4:1 shall have erosion control blanket installed
immediately after finished grading.
k. Organize plan sheets in the following order: Title sheet, Detail sheets, Grading &
Erosion Plan, Sanitary Sewer & Watermain sheets, Street sheets
Existing utilities shall be shown and labeled as existing.
All streets shall be clearly labeled.
Bench marks shall be placed on all sheets.
Title Block shall include horizontal and vertical scales, and City project number.
Verify Location Map and Overall Plan specific requirements on Title sheet.
The street construction plans shall show the centerline curve data.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes~MN051302.doc 8
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
Comments from the public:
Kelly Murray, representing Wensmann Realty, explained the original plan of Wensmann
1st Addition overlooking the access on this piece of property. It is a nice fit for both the
seller and developer that this could be worked out.
Kyle Schroeder, 15557 Highland Avenue, questioned the Comprehensive Plan for traffic
on County Road 82 as it relates to safety, access and noise; questioned the impervious
surface requirements and drainage impact on the wetland. Schroeder suggested more
consideration for traffic on County Road 82 for further developments.
Kansier responded the access points are dictated by Scott County based on spacing
requirements. The County Road will be upgraded. The City has requested that the road
be included in their Capital Improvement Plan.
Rye said the City Council is concerned with the traffic problems on County Road 82.
The City's understanding is that ultimately the road will become a 4-lane. The City does
not have control of the timing of the upgrade.
Kansier said the impervious surface and drainage meet the requirements as well as the
Watershed District's requirements.
Schroeder said he was concerned for the existing developments. There has to be a
Comprehensive Plan addressing the additional traffic. The City and County have to
partner on these issues.
Kansier said the County has a plan for the road. The City does partner with the County on
utilities, trails and bike paths. The City Council is concerned about the traffic issue and is
in contact with Scott County.
The Commissioners had a brief discussion on the development process.
The public hearing closed at 7:53 p.m.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Ringstad:
· Thanked Mr. Schroeder for his concerns regarding County Road 82.
· Based on the information - approve all four requests.
Criego:
· Questioned a connection between Regal Crest and this development. Kansier replied
it would not connect with this project. The adjoining property will eventually
connect.
· Kelly Murray explained the sanitary sewer easement and the connection.
· Agreed with staff's recommendation.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminuteshMN051302.doc 9
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
Lemke:
· Agreed with staff's recommendation, it is a good use for a half acre that would
otherwise become an unattractive nuisance.
Atwood:
· Support all requests.
Stamson:
· Agreed with staff and Commissioners, it is an appropriate use of the land.
· Questioned if the City already has a Wilderness Trail. Kansier said the road will not
be called Wilderness Trail. The development is call Wilderness Ridge.
MOTION BY RINGSTAD SECOND BY ATWOOD, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF REZONING 0.53 ACRES FROM THE R-1 DISTRICT TO THE R-2 DISTRICT.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY RINGSTAD, SECOND BY ATWOOD, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE WENSMANN 1 s, PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT TO STAFF'S CONDITIONS.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY RINGSTAD, SECOND BY ATWOOD, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL
OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS WENSMANN'S 3P'r>
ADDITION, SUBJECT TO STAFF'S CONDITIONS.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY RINGSTAD, SECOND BY ATWOOD, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL
OF THE VACATION DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER LOT 39,
BLOCK 1, WENSMANN 2Nv ADDITION, SUBJECT TO STAFF'S CONDITIONS.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This matter will go before the City Council on June 3, 2002.
A recess was called at 7:59 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:06 p.m.
6. Old Business:
A. Case File//02-013 (continued) Tom Holme Construction, Inc. is requesting
consideration of a preliminary plat named Red Cedar Heights consisting of 4.34
acres to be subdivided into 7 lots for single family residential development. The
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminuteshMN051302.doc l 0
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
property is located on the northeast side of Mushtown Road, west of Toronto
Avenue and Overlook Drive.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 13, 2002,
on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
Tom Holme Construction, Inc. has applied for a preliminary plat for the property located
on the north side of Mushtown Road, directly west of Toronto Avenue and Overlook
Drive. The preliminary plat consists of 4.34 acres to be subdivided into 7 lots for single
family residential development.
The Planning Commission considered this item at a public heating on April 22, 2002.
The major issue pertaining to the plat is the storm water runoff management ponds. The
Engineering Department has reviewed the storm water runoff plan and has determined
the second pond, located on the north end of Lots 3 and 4 may be acceptable, but is not
the most desirable plan. It was noted that the staff and the developer are reviewing other
options to manage some of this runoff. This solution would not be available before City
Council review of the preliminary plat, so the developer agreed to a condition that would
not allow a grading permit on the site until final plat approval. Other potential options
would not substantially affect the other design parameters of this plat.
The Commissioners felt the runoff issues should be addressed and the matter should be
open for the neighbors to review the plans. The Commission therefore tabled action on
this matter until May 13, 2002.
The staff recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the following
conditions:
1. There will be no grading permit issued until the final plat has been approved by the
City Council.
Identify the required buffer strip around the delineated wetland and the required 30'
setback from the 100-year flood elevation of the wetlands and ponds on the grading
plan.
Revise the tree inventory to identify the caliper inches of the significant trees.
Provide the calculations indicating the number of caliper inches to be removed for
development of roads, utilities and drainageways, and the number of caliper inches to
be removed for building pads and driveways.
Raise the garage floor elevations where possible at least 1' above the curb elevations
to provide positive drainage away from the house.
5. All improvements, including utilities, roads, storm water ponds and so on, must be
constructed in conformance with the Public Works Design Manual. All plans must
also be prepared in conformance with the Public Works Design Manual.
Commissioner Stamson reopened the public heating.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutesWiN051302.doc 1 1
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
Comments from the public:
Jennifer McCollough, 17294 Toronto Avenue SE, suggested re-routing the driveway to
Mushtown Road. McCollough explained drainage problems she had with her property.
She was also concemed with the long driveway and felt it would cause additional pooling
and stagnant water. McCollough pointed out there were 18 driveways on the surrounding
Mushtown Road and did not feel adding one more driveway would be a safety issue.
Requested the City require installation of a pipe under her driveway and leave the area
open and natural.
Ringstad questioned McCollough if the additional pipe would give her comfort with her
concerns with drainage problems. She responded she would like that.
Jim Johnson with Hakanson Anderson, represented the developers in the project.
Johnson addressed the drainage concern by Ms. McCollough on the proposed
development. It is necessary to get the water drained to the wetlands. He felt through the
grading plans this issue will be addreSsed. There will be natural buffering along
Mushtown Road and would like to see the driveway come out on Overlook Drive. The
Watershed District requirements have been met. Johnson explained the problems with
the access to the wetland. The plans were not sent to the City until Friday and therefore
the staffdid not receive them for review until today. He felt the issues had been
addressed.
Criego asked Johnson to explain the drainage on the southeast portion of the property.
Johnson responded the culvert running under the driveway to Overlook Drive goes into
the wetland area. The 12" pipe will meet the requirements for the water to get to the
wetland.
Jennifer McCollough questioned Johnson's explanation on drainage. Johnson pointed
out the driveway is going to be minimum width, probably 10 to 12 feet wide.
The public hearing was closed at 8:28 p.m.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Lemke:
· Agreed to move ahead. Staff is comfortable moving forward with the drainage issue.
· Understands the neighbor's concern for the driveway. Putting another driveway on
Mushtown Road just because there are 18 existing driveways does not make sense.
Atwood:
· Felt the driveway is excessive but agreed with staff when they say they want to limit
the access on Mushtown Road.
· Appreciated the homeowner's feelings.
· The 12" culvert sounds adequate. The City will hold the developer true to that.
· Move forward on with staff's recommendation.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutesWIN051302.doc 12
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
Ringstad:
· Agreed to move along.
· The neighbor's drainage concern will be resolved.
Criego:
· One of the reasons the Commission held this over was to assure the neighbor the
drainage was taken care of.
· Feel uncomfortable to move this forward. The City Engineer has not had time to
review this.
· All we are loosing is a couple of weeks for the neighbor's comfort.
· Felt the matter should be tabled.
Stamson:
· Regarding the driveway - there are problems both ways. It would be more of a
problem having the driveway come offMushtown Road. This provides a permanent
solution to the problem. It is a better design.
· Support that part of the draining plan.
· Understand Criego's concern but comfortable moving forward. Staff did not feel
there was any problem at the first meeting. There are no major problems effected by
the drainage.
· This will also be reviewed at the City Council level before a grading issue is granted.
· Move forward.
Open discussion:
· Lemke said now that the plat has been redesigned there should not be a problem and
was comfortable moving forward.
· Atwood heard two things from the neighbor, the drainage and appearance.
Appreciate her concerns, but staff has legitimate access to Mushtown Road.
MOTION BY RINGSTAND, SECOND BY LEMKE, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS RED CEDAR HEIGHTS,
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
Vote taken indicated ayes by Ringstad, Lemke, Atwood and Stamson. Nay by Criego.
MOTION CARRIED.
This item will go before the City Council on June 3, 2002.
7. New Business:
A. Case #02-043: The City of Prior Lake is requesting to vacate a drainage and
utility easement on part of Lot 1, Block 2, Waterfront Passage Addition.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes~VlN051302.doc 13
Planning Commission Meeting
May 13, 2002
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 13, 2002,
on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
The City of Prior Lake has filed an application to vacate a portion of the drainage and
utility easement located on Lot 1, Block 2, Waterfront Passage Addition. This property is
located on the southwest side of Cottonwood Lane, east ofFish Point Road and west of
Adelmann Street. The easement originally covered a wetland area that has since been
filled. Vacating the easement will facilitate construction of the Norex office building on
this site.
Staff recommended approval of the request. Once this portion of wetland was filled, the
need for a drainage and utility easement ceased to exist.
Comments from the Commissioners:
All Commissioners supported staff's report.
MOTION BY LEMKE, SECOND BY ATWOOD, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF THE PROPOSED VACATION OF THE EASEMENT.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This matter will go before the City Council on May 20, 2002.
8. Announcements and Correspondence:
Atwood commented it was nice to see the Norex building in the business office park.
Rye said Norex was happy to build and stay in Prior Lake.
Lemke questioned an informational sign off Franklin Trail. Kansier explained the signs
on new developments.
Criego questioned a tour of the City. Kansier said it is still planned for July 29th.
Criego mentioned the Planning Commission had talked about further discussions on
separating R-1 and Medium density. Rye said the City was prepared to go ahead with the
discussions but the Long Range Committee was formed and it was decided to hold off
and see what transpires from that. There may be other things in the Comprehensive Plan
to look at. It will be reviewed at the same time.
9. Adjournment:
The meeting adjoumed at 8:40 pm.
Don Rye
Community Development Director
Connie Carlson
Recording Secretary
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminuteshMN051302.doc 14