The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-13-11 PC Agenda Packet4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MONDAY, JUNE 13, 2011 City Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. 1. Call Meeting to Order 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Consider Approval of May 9, 2011 Meeting Minutes: 4. Public Hearings: A. #EP 11-101: Eagle Creek Estates Rezoning. Equity Properties LLC is requesting to amend the Zoning Map designation on approximately 16 acres of property from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to C-2 (General Business). The subject property is commonly known as the Snell property, located northeast of the intersection of CSAH 21 and Fish Point Road. B. #EP 11-118: SMSC Conditional Use Permit. The Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community has submitted an application requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow site grading in excess of 400 cubic yards for a sanitary sewer improvement project. The subject property is located at 13901 Canterbury Road NW, on the northeast corner of CSAH 42 and CSAH 83. C. #EP 11-117: Berggren Beach Variance. Beth Berggren has submitted an application for Variances from the side yard setback and lot width on a site consisting of approximately 0.9 acres of land to be subdivided into 2 lots for single family homes. The property is located at 4853 Beach Street NE, between Rosewood Road NE and Bluebird Trail NE. D. # EP 11-117: Berggren Beach Combined Preliminary and Final Plat. Beth Berggren has submitted an application for a combined preliminary and final plat consisting of approximately 0.9 acres of land to be subdivided into 2 lots for single family homes. The property is located at 4853 Beach Street NE, between Rosewood Road NE and Bluebird Trail NE. E. #EP 11-116: Eastwood Third Addition Combined Preliminary and Final Plat. Cygnus Construction has submitted an application for a combined preliminary and final plat consisting of approximately 1.59 acres to be subdivided into 3 lots for single family homes. This property is located on the south shore of Prior Lake, on the north side of Estate Avenue NE, north of 150th Street SE. 5. Old Business: None. L:\11 FILES\11 PLANNING COMMISSION\11 AGENDAS\061311 Agenda.doc Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpnorlakexom 6. New Business: None 7. Announcements and Correspondence: None 8. Adjournment: L:\ll FILES\ll PLANNING COMMISSION\1l AGENDAS\061311 Agenda.doc PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, MAY 9, 2011 Call to Order: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 9, 2011 Chairman Fleming called the May 9, 2011, Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Fleming, Roszak, Perez, Billington, Development & Natural Resources Director Danette Parr, Planner Larry Poppler and Development Services Assistant Joe Sortland. by Fleming, Howley Consider Approval of April 25, 2011 Public Hearings: #EP 11-111. Ryland Pointe in the Jeffers acres to be subdivi Ridge and west2l Planner Matzke F Pond 4th Addition. approved for t Unit DE the overall Jeffers phase two in 2012 of development will not and Howley, Community Jeff Matz*,Assistant City Engineer MEETING MEETING inary plat to be known as The sists of approximately 13.58 site is located east of Wild Pt to be known as The Pointe in the Jeffers in 2005. 693 residential units were originally ars Pond was originally approved as a Planned PUD Amendment to change the originally 8 detached single family home lots. The Pointe would be :on the lots adjacent to the already constructed road within Ily pl ed as a private street, but the developer is requesting that add to the City of Prior Lake street system as a public street. 00 to 3,300 square foot homes, ranging from $289,000 to $349,000 reduced from 38% to 24% for The Pointe, and 35.5% to 24.5 for ment. The developer anticipates beginning phase one in late 2011 nimum building standards will be required to ensure the approved if the developer changes. Questions from the Commissioners: Howley asked if the rain garden will be maintained by the City. and Matzke answered that the rain garden will be an outlot that will be dedicated to the City. Because it is draining from a public street the City has preferred maintain rain gardens in the past. Howley asked who would be responsible for the maintenance of the rain garden. L:\11 FILES\11 PLANNING COMMISSION\11 MINUTES\MN050911.doc Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 9, 2011 Parr answered that the City prefers to maintain rain gardens. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BILLINGTON AND SECONDED BY HOWLEY TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Billington, Perez, Roszak and Howley. The motion carried. The Public Hearing began at 6:16 p.m. Comments from the Public: Michael Ramme, 7599 Anagram Drive, Eden Prairie, pre Homes. The Pointe will be the second development within development being Stonebriar. The first phase will consist model home constructed by September, 2011.The Seco build out by 2013. The lots will be 70 to 75 feet wideAnin memorandum attached with the Planning Commissi Association (HOA) would be acceptable with mainta Billington asked if elevations of the proposed homes could be Ramme presented side elevations of the prd§ftd homes. Billington asked if the presented elevations Ramme answered that the pr, ted elevations Billington asked if the Ramme confirmed Billington Ramme BilliKqtodftked what the Ramme ansVNWthat they gam u[� TPT:Fi�Iwerfflwm@2= Ramme answered clear to future horr maintenance. would is the designs. square feet. mum size. Ho in the process of developing a rambler style elevation. footage would be for the rambler. the rambler to be 1,900 square feet. standards for the homes would be included in the HOA covenants. esign standards would be included in the covenants and would be made Design standards would include plantings, square footages and Fleming asked about the aesthetically pleasing architecture and what measures would be taken to ensure the architectural style would be guaranteed. Mark Sonstegard, 7599 Anagram Drive, Eden Prairie, Land Developer for Ryland homes, answered that he would be involved with writing the HOA documents, which would include minimum building material standards such as: brick and stone, along with other design standards presented in the L:\11 FILES\11 PLANNING COMMISSION\11 MINUTES\MN050911.doc 2 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 9, 2011 proposed home elevations. Three car garages would have windows and panels and landscaping of the lots would also be required. The square footage requirements would also be included within the HOA documents. Fleming asked if the proposed design standards in the covenants would allow homeowners a variety of housing designs. Sonstegard answered that there are three different elevations for each of the five proposed homes and that the rambler would bring it to six home designs. Billington asked what Ryland Homes saw in The Pointe at Jeffers Billington said it would be appropriate for the Jeffers Pond H Ryland Homes to discuss their concerns. Paske thought that Ryland Homes is proposi%omes and originally proposed. He asked about the right been Perez answered that Pointe P NW appears platted for the second pha Oig -na elm . �t ®5.. ®.. meet with the representatives from than what was Pointe road has not been Paske purchased in The Ridge remains valued has to be fluid and responsive to changes in the market uld not be hamstringed because the HOA has not met between the originally proposed The Pointe home sizes and what is Pond meet with the developer prior to City Council meeting. inte proposal will go before the City Council on June 6th Paske asked who their contact with the City would be. Matzke answered that Paske could contact himself for the Community Development Department and that there would not be a public hearing at the City Council meeting. He added that the Planning Commission meeting is the opportunity for public input. Matzke said that the final plat for The Pointe would also be going before the Planning Commission and the City Council, which would take place in approximately a month and a half. L:\11 FILES\11 PLANNING COMMISSION\11 MINUTES\MN050911.doc Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 9, 2011 Matzke said that because The Pointe was originally planned as townhomes, which would have different covenants and square footage requirements than The Ridge, it likely was never part of the same covenants or HOA as The Ridge. Paske said that The Ridge has larger lot frontage and asked if the City is making an exception for The Pointe. Matzke answered that the density for The Pointe is decreasing from 56 attached townhomes to 48 detached single family homes. Matzke added that The Pointe homeswou ave wider lot widths than what was originally approved for The Pointe. Paske asked if The Pointe lot designs would have to be the Ridge. Matzke answered that because The Pointe is a separate have the same lot width as The Ridge. Paske asked about the impervious surface coverage for Matzke answered that the proposed impervious surface co% approved for The Pointe. Fleming added that the proposed detached homes for more appealing for residential sales within Jef WIN -ARA - R 01�� _ VOTE: Ayes by The public hearing closed 5? -T1 71101W approved for The Pond. s not have to less than what was originally could be considered TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC Roszak a Howlev. The motion carried. approved for Jeffers pond. Matzke an d that Jeffers terfro� which will have two story townhomes containing four to six units, anticip nstruction t summer. There are also a couple other areas within Jeffers Pond which offer hou ternative her than detached residential homes. Howley stated his su he Pointe, and that it should not have to meet any covenants approved for The Ridge. Billington said that the previously approved townhomes for The Pointe have been found to not be viable with the current market conditions and that the project will serve the City well. Billington stated his support for the project. Perez said that the improvements in density and the impervious surface percentage will be a benefit to the City. Perez acknowledged that market conditions can change and that the new developer for the project has been helpful. L:\11 FILES\11 PLANNING COMMISSION\11 MINUTES\MN050911.doc Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 9, 2011 Perez asked Poppler if they need to add any additional conditions. Poppler answered that existing conditions of the street are adequate. Perez asked if there should be a bond for the street. Poppler answered that due to the City taking ownership of the street, there would be an added cost for sealcoating or cracking. Perez asked if staff had any recommendation for addressing the street Matzke answered that they can recommend a condition of approval ouId be addressed when the City Council hears the request. Perez stated his support for the project. Roszak believes that the rain garden and the transitio m townhome to detache avorable. Roszak stated his support for the project. Fleming asked about the condition of the street. Poppler answered that the condition of t future repairs would be addressed at the Fleming stated that it is important for the future homes in The Pointe. Fleming asked how Matzke said 119 have been comp Fleming MWO Perez requested to add a 4th engineering dartment". rs ition been 101 planned for. 50% of the platted homes neighborhood within Jeffers Pond. SECONDED BY ROSZAK TO APPROVE THE that "street maintenance dollars as recommended by the VOTE: Ayes by Flel@ft Per Billington, Roszak and Howley. The motion carried. 5. Old Business: A. None 6. New Business: A. None 7. Announcements and Correspondence: L:\11 FILES\11 PLANNING COMMISSION\11 MINUTES\MN050911.doc 5 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 9, 2011 A. 2030 Vision and Strategic Plan Update Meeting will be held on Saturday, May 21, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. at Club Prior. Parr said that on Saturday, May 21, the City will be holding a meeting on the 2030 Vision and Strategic Plan from 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM in Club Prior. On May 31, in the City Hall Chamber, there will be a Town Hall meeting regarding to the County Road 21 project. Consultants from the three different firms will present their findings and proposed plans, followed by public input. Matzke said the May 9th will be Danette Parr's last Planning Co employment at the City of Cottage Grove. Fleming thanks Parr for her diligence and her hard work. Commission. Billington thanked Parr stated she has had a wonderful experience 8. Adjournment Joe Sortland, Development Services L:\11 FILES\11 PLANNING COMMISSION\11 MINUTES\MN050911.doc begins Planning AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: INTRODUCTION 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 3A CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 15.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CSAH 21 AND FISH POINT ROAD JEFF MATZKE, PLANNER _YES X NO -N/A JUNE 13, 2011 Equity Properties LLC has submitted a request for an amendment to the Zoning Map for approximately 15.5 acres of land located northeast of the intersection of CSAH 21 and Fish Point Road. BACKGROUND: The 15.5 acre Zoning Map Amendment subject area is a portion of an approximately 45.7 acre conceptual development previously brought before the Planning Commission and City Council. In addition, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to redesignate the 15.5 acre area from C -BO (Business Park) to C -CC (Community Retail Shopping) on May 16, 2011. The conceptual development plan proposes a mixture of commercial and residential uses, including 15.5 acres of retail commercially zoned property, 67 single family lots, and a park. The entire 45.7 acre site is currently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). Equity Properties LLC is proposing the amendment to the Zoning Map in order to allow C-2 General Business commercial uses within the southern portion of the project site. PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Total Site Area: The area of the Zoning Map Amendment request consists of 15.5 acres of the total 45.7 acres site. Vegetation: There are a large number of significant trees located on the west end of the site. Future development of the property will be subject to the Tree Preservation Ordinance which will be reviewed as part of a proposed plat application. Wetlands: The site is subject to the provisions of the State Wetland Conservation Act. A specific delineation will be required as part of any plat application. Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpriorlakexom Access: Access to this property will be from extensions of existing Fish Point Road and Credit River Road. Utilities: Sewer services will be available from the existing lift station, southeast of the site. Water services will be available from the north and south through the extension of Fish Point Road. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: ANALYSIS: The applicant is proposing to develop this site with a mix of commercial and residential uses. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with this overall conceptual development proposal. The applicant has submitted a market study which supports the placement of retail commercial services in the area. The study states 'limited convenience retail and small service offices" are among the appropriate uses for the site. Currently there are no planned neighborhood or general business uses (C-1 or C-2 Zoning Districts) in the immediate area that would serve the existing residents, as well as future residents and employees of the surrounding area. While the City of Prior Lake has approximately 149 acres of C-2 (General Business) designated land throughout the community, there are only 5.5 acres of property in the southeast quadrant of the City (along the County Hwy 21 corridor east of MN Hwy 13) currently designated for C-2 uses. In additional, 56 acres of land designated for C-3 (Business Office Park) are located immediately south of the site (across Cty Hwy 21). Existing Use Land Use Designation Zoning North Single Family Homes R -LD R-1 (Cardinal Ridge Development) (Urban Low Density Residential) (with PUD Overlay District) County Hwy 21 & County Right -of -Way & C-3 South Business Office Park uses C -BO (Business Park) (Waterfront Passage Development) (Business Office Park) Vacant Land, City Maintenance R -LD R-1 East Shop, & Church Property (Urban Low Density Residential) (Low Density Residential) I -PI 1-1 (Planned Industrial) (General Industrial) West Single Family Homes, City Park R -LD R-1 (Credit River Road & Brooksville Hills Park) (Urban Low Density Residential) (Low Density Residential) ANALYSIS: The applicant is proposing to develop this site with a mix of commercial and residential uses. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with this overall conceptual development proposal. The applicant has submitted a market study which supports the placement of retail commercial services in the area. The study states 'limited convenience retail and small service offices" are among the appropriate uses for the site. Currently there are no planned neighborhood or general business uses (C-1 or C-2 Zoning Districts) in the immediate area that would serve the existing residents, as well as future residents and employees of the surrounding area. While the City of Prior Lake has approximately 149 acres of C-2 (General Business) designated land throughout the community, there are only 5.5 acres of property in the southeast quadrant of the City (along the County Hwy 21 corridor east of MN Hwy 13) currently designated for C-2 uses. In additional, 56 acres of land designated for C-3 (Business Office Park) are located immediately south of the site (across Cty Hwy 21). The following is a list of uses allowed within the C-2 (General Business) Zoning District: C-4 GENERAL BUSINESS Permitted Uses Uses Permittedby CUP Libraries Motor Fuel Station Museums Motor Vehicle Sales Open Space Motor Vehicle Service & Repair Police/Fire Stations Restaurants With Liquor Parking Business Clubs & Lodges With Liquor Banks Shopping Centers Over 275,000 Square Feet (Gross Area Medical/Dental Offices Funeral Home AccessoiyUses Office Parking Lots Service Incidental Repair or Processing Retail Food Service Business Trade Schools Outdoor Seating & Service Studio Helisto s which are subordinate to the principal use Showrooms Bar (as accessory to a restaurant, hotel, private entertainment, club, orlod e Permitted Uses with Conditions Adult Day Care Group Day Care/Nursery School Public Service Structures Animal Handing Appliance, Small Engine & Bicycle Repair is greater Clubs & Lodges without Liquor License Food Service In -Vehicle Sales or Service Restaurants Without Liquor License Dry Clearing & Laundering With Route Delivery Utility Substation Dimensional Standards of the C-2 Zonina District include the fol Minimum Minimum Maximum Front Side Yard Rear Parking Lot Area Lot Width Height Yard (ft.) (ft.) Yard (ft.) Setback (ft.) (ft.) 1 Acre 150 45' or 4 30 20 30 10 stories, whichever is greater Lots Adjacent to Residential Use Districts: The following setbacks shall apply to developments on lots adjacent to Residential Use Districts: Building Setback Adjacent to "R" Use District 60 feet Setback Adjacent to "R" Use District 20 feet Zoning Ordinance Amendment Findings Section 1108.600 of the Zoning Ordinance identifies the following policies for amendments to the Official Zoning Map: • The area, as presently zoned, is inconsistent with the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan, or the land was originally zoned erroneously due to a technical or administrative error, or • The area for which rezoning is requested has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to rezone so as to encourage redevelopment of the area, or • The permitted uses allowed within the proposed Use District will be appropriate on the subject property and compatible with adjacent properties and the neighborhood. In this case, the area for which the rezoning is requested has changed. On May 16, 2011 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from C -BO (Business Park) to C -CC (Community Retail Shopping). The rezoning will facilitate and encourage redevelopment of the site. Through anaylsis will need to be taken as part of any future plat review, Site Plan Review, or Conditional Use Permit process to assure the uses will be appropriate in respect to the future adjacent residential neighborhood. ANkiIs] ILI&I[•L In conclusion, the applicant is requesting a Zoning Map Amendment to allow the property to be rezoned from R-1 (Urban Low Density) to C-2 (General Business). The proposed use district is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. Based upon the findings set forth in this report, staff recommends approval. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the Zone Change as proposed 2. Recommend denial of the request. 3. Other specific action as directed by the Planning Commission RECOMMENDATION: City staff finds the proposed C-2 Zoning District consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, therefore City Staff recommends Alternative 1. ACTION REQUIRED: This proposal requires the following motion: 1. A motion and second to recommend approval of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the zoning of 15.5 acres of the subject property from the R-1 (Urban Low Density Residential) to C-2 (General Business) Zoning District. EXHIBITS: Location Map Market Study for proposed site EAGLE CREEK ESTATES LOCATION MAP D- I os u fig. Q C N 7-a -0 ❑- O O N < rt D Cn M. S p O ❑ `< � ❑ O a O O p O N 7 � a❑ (� � rt a ❑ S rt rtl p rt — S D a1 rt 3 F- O N. ❑ ❑ No C m OC:a�(< ,� `< S r _ D l D cn rt CD �• C) d N rt (D .O -F � 0 r -i- Q (-- 0 —rn7 lV 0 CD n ••••r -• ••_� lull o. uic ry L Mair or me noutneast Wu rl I I 1 0 0 March 17, 2011 MEMORANDUM (Draft Copy -roe Discussion) TO: Mr. Ray Brandt FROM: Mary C. Bujold Maxfield Research Inc. RE: Assessment of Highest and Best Use of Property Located on County Road 21 at Fish Point Road in Prior Lake, Minnesota Introduction This memorandum review your property located on the north side of County Road 21 at the intersection with Fish Point Road in Prior Lake, Minnesota. At this time, the subject property is vacant. According to the City's current zoning/land use, the subject property is currently zoned as agricultural use, but this property is guided for future use as Business/Office Park for parcels that are located adjacent to County Road 21 and as low-density urban residential for parcels that are situated further north. This memorandum explores the potential attractiveness of parcels located immediately north of the subject property for commercial use that would be compatible with surrounding uses and would maintain the general considerations for use as a location for business development. Site Assessment The subject property is located north of the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road in Prior Lake, Minnesota. Fish Point Road has been constructed south of County Road 21, but has not been completed to connect with the existing segment of Fish Point Road that is located further north. The City's Comprehensive Plan calls for tate eventual connection of Fish Point Road through the property to connect with the north segment. The connection of the southern segment of Fish Point Road to the northern segment is identified as a long-term timeframe. The Comprehensive Plan also calls for the upgrade of the County Road 21 and Fish Point Road intersection in the short-term. An upgrade of this intersection would further prepare this area for future development. The maps on the following pages identify the current guided use in 2030 and the proposed use. 615 1" Avenue NE, #500, Minneapolis, MN 55413 (612)338.0012 (612)904.7979 fax www.max fieldresearch.com C C> Cd C) M C) C14 jif L� 216 O at at Mr. Ray Brandt The subject property is currently vacant land zoned as agricultural. The property is currently guided for office/business park development. North of the property is single-family residential and the northern agriculturally -zoned area is also guided for single-family development. The land to the west/southwest of Margraf Lake is currently vacant, Single-family development is the predominant existing land use which is located north and west of the subject property. South of the subject property is a mix of primarily light industrial and public and semi-public property. To the southeast is commercial property and some public property. East of the property is industrial, public property and vacant undeveloped land that surrounds the southern half of Margraf Lake. Multifamily housing units are located south of County Road 21 and east of the southern segment of Fish Point Road. The laud uses that currently exist in the immediate area of the subject property are those that would benefit from a limited level of convenience retail development at the intersection of Fish Point Road and County Road 21. We do not envision that the property would support a significant amount of retail development, primarily limited retail and service-oriented businesses that world serve the existing and future household base along with existing and future employees as the area continues to develop with residential and business uses. The portions of the subject property that directly abut County Road 21 would be most appropriate for the development of convenience retail uses. These uses would support flture development that is planned for this area, such as office/business park, light industrial and single- family development. Retail uses would act as a buffer between traffic on County Road 21 which is projected to increase substantially over time and less dense uses to the north. Access to the property is convenient from the Fish Point Road intersection, which is planned to be upgraded. Once the north and south segments of Fish Point Road are connected, the appeal of the property for retail development would be significantly enhanced, Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes along County Road 21 have continued to increase over time. Table 1 presents information on recent traffic volumes and projected volumes on County Road 21 at 2030. In conversation with the City, a general slowdown in economic development due to the recession may modestly delay the rise in traffic volumes to the projected 2030 level, although most recent conditions suggest that traffic volumes in this area are accelerating rather rapidly. Table I shows that in 2002, estimated AADT (average annual daily trips) on County Road 21 west and east of Fish Point Road increased by 400 trips per day west of the intersection and by 700 trips per day east of the intersection. Current estimated traffic volumes on County Road 21 west of Fish Point Road total 15,300 trips. East of Fish Point Road is showing traffic volumes at 13,100 trips. The increase from 2002 to 2009 for volume west of Fish Lake Road is 2.7% and for the volume east of Fish Lake Road is 5.6%. Traffic volume cast of Fish Lake Road has increased twice as fast as the volume west of Fish Lake Road. MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Mr. Ray Brandt The projected traffic volume for 2030 for this area is currently listed as 24,700 west of Fish Point Road and 29,000 east of Fish Point Road. Tire projected volumes suggest that traffic will increase more rapidly moving east on County Road 21 from Fish Point Road, than to the west. According to the City's Transportation Plan, the intersection of Fish Point Road at County Road 21 is listed as planned for upgrades in the short-term. Long-term, the segment of Fish Point Road that is planned between County Road 21 and Highway 13 is expected to be constructed, although the general timing of this construction is likely to depend on the development of the property that is guided as low-density residential (general single-family homes). TABLE TRAIT(C VOLUMETRENDS INTERSECTION OF FISH POINT ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD 21 2002,2009 & 2030 AAD I' Psti ate Estimate Projected Giauge,2009-2030 2002 2009 2030* No. Pct. CR21,west ormsi,PoiutRoad 14,900 15,300 24,500 9,200 60.1% CR21, east of Fish Point Road 12,400 13,100 29,000 15,900 121.4% A ADT = Annual Average Daily Trips * As pro ected in the Cit • of Prior Lake Tmas rotation flan Sources: MN/DOT; city ori'dortakeTmns pottation Plan; Maxfield Research file. Projected traffic volumes between 2009 and 2030 are expected to show significant increases, although the projected volumes are not expected to be filly realized until 2030 and may depend to some degree oro improvements to Comity Road 21 that are under consideration east of Highway 13. The City is considering different options for the alignment and improvement (upgrades) of County Road 21 and its access to Downtown Prior Lake. It is generally accepted that the current configuration of County Road 21 through Downtown Prior Lake is unacceptable in order to be able to handle the projected traffic volumes. The final outcome of any temporary reconfiguration or the construction of a fill bypass of the existing Downtown is being discussed, but no decisions have yet been made. Table 2 shows traffic volume trends for the area near to Downtown Prior Lake and County Road 21's intersection with Highway 13. Traffic volumes along County Road 21 are expected to increase dramatically by 2030. While additional traffic is expected along County Road 21 in the near term because of a new connection of County Road 21 with Highway 169, the trajectory of traffic volume increases remains somewhat uncertain. MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Mr. Ray Brandt TADLG2 TRAFFIC 11OLDIIETRENDS INFERS WFION OF HIGH\YAY 13 & COINTY ROAD 21 2001,2009,& 2030 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Estinnae Fsthmte Projected Chan e, 2009-2030 2001 2009 2030° No. Pct. CR 21, west of Hwy 13 10,000 10,800 27,000 16,200 150.00/0 CR 21, east of Hwy 13 10,300 10,800 24,500 13,700 126.9% Hwy 13, south ofCR21 15,000 17,900 22,000 4,100 22.9% Hwy 13, north of CR 21 12,500 13,700 21,000 7,300 53.3% °As Projected inthe City of Prior Lake Transportation Plan Sources: MN/DOT; City of Prior Lake Tions potation Plan; SRF Consulting; Maxiiield Research Inc. Traffic Volume Support for Commercial Development Commercial development and predominantly convenience retail development relies heavily on drive-by traffic for revenue support. Convenience retail uses, in considering locations that offer the greatest potential for success typically desire the following qualities in a location: • Moderate to high traffic volumes (varies somewhat for different types of uses) • Excellent visibility • Convenient and east ingress and egress to the property • Signalized intersection which enhances ingress and egress through controlled traffic movements that optimize the ability of vehicles front all directions to access the property. Traffic volumes as of 2009 are currently high enough to support many commercial retail uses and projected traffic volumes certainly support these types of uses along County Road 21. In addition to the traffic volumes however, locations that are most desirable are those that are located at the corners of signalized intersections where traffic must stop for a time, but where turning motions are allowed in each direction to access the parcels. The area cast of the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road is guided for future light industrial development. The office/business park and light industrial development categories are somewhat different in the uses that would be allowed in each however the types of development that have usually located in these areas tend to he similar in character. The parcels immediately north at the Fish Point Road intersection will serve as a buffer between high traffic levels on County Road 21 and the proposed [,in([ use for properly further north which is expected to develop primarily as single-family residential. Commercial retail uses located at the Fish Point Road intersection will provide additional convenience for residents, employees MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC Mr. Ray Brandt and business owners and world be an additional amenity for all of these types of development. Households and businesses, because of increasing time constraints, are desiring to live and/or work in close proximity to retail goods and services. Convenience items such as a gas station/convenience store, small restaurant and drugstore are uses that are highly attractive to businesses that would locate in the area for the service needs of their employees as well as nearby households traveling to and from home. In the initial stages, commercial uses on the subject parcels would need to rely on traffic from County Road 21 and from south on Fish Point Road. In the ftiture, once Fish Point Road is connected, any commercial uses would be able to attract business from the north along Fish Point Road. Guided Locations for Office/Business Park and Light Industrial The area immediately south of County Road 21 at Fish Point Road is currently guided for office/business park and industrial development. A similar situation is found north of County Road 21 at Fish Point Road. The other large area designated for planned industrial development is located at the west edge of Prior Lake, either side of County Road 282. Also adjacent to the planned industrial development is a relatively large section of land guided for neighborhood shopping. There are also two other large areas guided in the Comprehensive Plan for office/business park development. Both are located on County Road 42. In both cases, these properties are adjacent to other parcels that have been designated as guided for community retail shopping. The planning acknowledges the compatibility and attractiveness of locating retail goods and services in close proximity to office/business park uses because business owners desire locations where they and their employees can easily access these goods and services. In seeking locations for company offices, corporate users often select locations that have retail amenities nearby such as restaurants, hospitality and other convenience shopping items. At this time, the office/business park area located at the intersection of Fish Point Road and County Road 21 is not adjacent to an area that has been designated as neighborhood retail or community retail. There is a very small area located at the east edge of the City that is designated for hospitality and general business at the intersection of County Road 21 and County Road 87. It appeal from the map that a portion of the property at this intersection may actually be located in Spring Lake or Credit River Townships. It is possible that the City may have an annexation agreement with either of these jurisdictions to incorporate this area into the City of Prior Lake. The arca south of County Road 21 at the Fish Point Road intersection is currently guided as office/business park and has been developed with a mix of uses including light industrial, office and mini -storage. At this time, the market for these types of development has been temporarily MAXFIFLD RESEARCH INC. Mr. Ray Brandt suppressed because of the recession. It is expected that demand for parcels to accommodate these uses will again increase as the economy progresses further in its recovery. Guided Locations for Neighborhood Shopping Areas The following general locations are shown on the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan as guided for neighborhood shopping. Several of these areas are already developed with commercial retail uses. 1) Downtown Prior Lake (East of Highway 13 and north of County Road 21) 2) South and east on Highway 13 3) North and east on Highway 13, north of Main Avenue 4) hrtersection of County Road 42 and Highway 13 5) In the northern tier of the City at major intersections along Comity Road 42 6) On the southwest side of the City, generally southeast of County Road 282 Locations 5 and 6 are those that are situated adjacent to properties that are guided for industrial and office/business park uses. Location 5 has two large areas where property is guided for use as office/business park and where there are also adjacent parcels guided as retail shopping. Additional neighborhood shopping areas are shown at major intersections and near to residential development. Households increasingly want convenience retail items in close proximity to their homes and or places of work to be able to access these goods and services easily. Time and convenience continue to remain high on everyone's list. We believe that the attractiveness of office and business park sites that have community retail adjacent to them will be highly desirable to businesses. The literature also supports this premise that amenities that are identified as desirable for Office Park development. According to the Urban Land Institute's Qfce Development Handbook, all of a site's qualities will affect the building's potential for attracting tenants. In the book, Jim Goodell, president of Goodell Associates of Pasadena, California, an office developer, makes these recommendations regarding site selection for office buildings: Located in areas with a sense of place, alongside support uses such as restaurants, shopping areas and club facilities. These support uses increase the ability of the office building to charge higher rents. MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Mr. Ray Brandt In suburban areas, the property should be located close to freeways or roads that feed into the regional traffic system. Good access to adjacent roads is critical. In considering the selection of locations for business parks, a location near amenities and services is considered to be highly desirable and to provide the business park location with a competitive advantage. Amenities and services such as retail facilities, hotels, and restaurants are considered important and can attract businesses that are considering multiple locations.' )Existing Land Uses Table 3 shows a breakout of the existing land uses within the City of Prior Lake. TABLE3 EXISTING LAND USE CITY OF PRIOR I.AI(E May 2005 Land Use Acres Percent of Total A riculnme 1,826.33 11 16.3% Commercial 126.69 1.1% Industrial 80.62 0.7% Lakes 1,623.14 14.5% Multi -Family Residenlial 429.08 3.8% Pads and Recreation 1,177.34 10.50/0 Public/Semi-Public 1 338.73 3.0% RegioaalPouds 10.77 0.1% R -O -W 995.56 8.90/. Single -Family Residential 2,652.63 23.7% SMSC71vst 593.93 5.3% SMSCFee 533.02 4.80/a Vacant 719.74 6.4% Wetlands 103.02 0.90/0 Total 11,210.60 100.0% Source: City of Prior Lake 2030 Comprehensive land (Ise Plan As of 2005, the City of Prior Lake included 11,210.6 acres of land. Approximately 29% of the land within the City at that tiale is undevelopable because it is a lake, wetland, regional pond, right -of way or SMSC Trust Land. Another 4.75% of land is owned by the SMSC in fee. Residential uses comprise about 27% of the existing [an([ area. The largest land use in the City remains single-family residential with 2,652.63 acres, despite an increase in the number of Anne, et at, Business Park and Industrial Derelopment Handbook. Washington, D.C.: ULI-Urban Land le, 2001. MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Mr. Ray Brandt permits issued recently for new townhomes. Parks and recreation land encompassed 10.5% of the land area in the City as of 2005. Agricultural land is listed as one of the largest land uses in the City as of 2005 with a total acreage dedicated to agricultural of 1,826.33 acres or 16.29% of the total. The subject property is listed on the existing land use map as agricultural land. As growth continues in the Twin Cities Metro Area, this land will be developed eventually and its use will likely be divided into several categories depending on final development. Large areas in the northern tier of the City are also currently zoned as agricultural, but over time are guided toward various urban uses such as office/business park, community shopping, and single-family residential. Therefore, as the City grows, most, if not all of the land currently zoned as agricultural will be developed with other uses. The total amount of land currently zoned as commercial is 1.13% or 126.69 acres. Land zoned as industrial is even less, 80.62 acres or 0.72%. The 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Plan allows for a reasonable portion of agricultural property to be eventually developed as office/business park or industrial. Parcels are generally located along major roadways, locations that are desirable for this type of development. The City of Prior Lake has entered into an orderly annexation agreement with Spring Lake Township encompassing approximately 3,000 acres. Most of this land area is vacant or agricultural land, but there are some existing large lot single-family residential sites included in the acreage. Other development constraints include some wetlands and lakes, However, the addition of this land area into Prior Lake will increase the supply of developable land within the City. A portion of the land to be annexed in the southwest corner as shown on the 2030 Land Use Map is guided for Industrial and Community Shopping along County Road 282. 2030 Land Use Designations The 2030 Land Use designations for Prior Lake identify the northern portion of the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road, approximately 14.81 acres as C -BO (Commercial - Business and Office Park. The criteria for this land use are intended to have low trip generation rate and utilization of the site that is compatible with natural features. Office parks are intended to serve small professional services in a group setting whereas such uses might otherwise be located in retail centers or in scattered freestanding buildings. This land use has high design standards and is intended to have the potential to incorporate features such as shared parking, open space, convenient housing and service, and reduction of traffic generation onto public streets. In general, the C -BO designation does not allow retail sales of products as a conditional use. The Neighborhood Retail Shopping (C -NR) designation is characterized by low -intensity, service-oriented retail, shopping and convenience facilities which are specifically designed to serve the residents of the immediate area. Although no mention is made in the land use plan MAXrIELD RESEARCH INC. Mr. Ray Brandt regarding serving the convenience needs of local employees of nearby office and industrial areas, neighborhood retail shopping and community shopping areas also serve these individuals. The intent of the neighborhood retail shopping area is to limit the amount and type of retail in this classification to a building size of no more than 10,000 square feet and a nnaxinrtun lot area of 5 acres. In conjunction with the intention to serve the convenience needs of area residents, this type of use: • May be adjacent to low-density residential areas • Requires buffering and screening of activity areas from residences • Should be located at the intersection of streets classified at least as collectors and • Should be located within easy walking distance or within five minute driving time of residents within the primary neighborhood. The location of the subject parcels essentially at the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road meets all of the criteria identified above. The property is adjacent to an area that is guided for low-density residential development. It is located at the intersection of streets that are classified at a minimum as collectors, although the northern portion of Fish Point Road has not been constructed through to County Road 21 on the north side. This is identified ht the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and in the Transportation Plan as long-term. The parcels are within walking distance and/or immediate driving distance of the finture low- density neighborhood and currently within walking distance and/or driving distance of other business development and immediate nearby neighborhoods to the west. Once Fish Point Road is constructed through to County Road 21, the access to other nearby residential neighborhoods would be even more convenient. In considering that future land use for this area includes the connecting of Fish Point Road between County Road 21 and its current end point within the existing single-family subdivision, the connection of this roadway will automatically result in higher traffic volumes along Fish Point Road. Businesses and residents would find convenience retail at this location highly accessible and in accordance with the general requirements for neighborhood retail. Uses that are contemplated for the property under new zoning include coffee shop, gas station/convenience store, drugstore, and other small convenience and service uses targeted toward consumers. Residents would find these uses easily within walking distance and within easy driving distance also. Residents and employees that are traveling along County Road 21 to the east would be able to easily access retail goods and services at this location without having to travel further into the City and then back out again. MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC, Mr. Ray Brandt We envision that a small amount of convenience retail at this location could in effect reduce traffic congestion that would result from extra trips by local residents into the center of the city to obtain these goods and services. Neighborhood convenience services are currently located on Highway 13 and in Downtown Prior Lake. The proposed reconfiguration of County Road 21 through Downtown Prior Lake is most likely to reduce the potential for some convenience retail in the Downtown as the access and visibility will be constrained in some locations. Table 4 shows projected land use by acreage for the City of Prior Lake for the 2030 plan. TABLE4 2030 LAND LISEPLAN Cily of Pritar Uke 2006 LandLlsc Acres Percent of Total Residential 8,555 56.0% Rural Density 153 LO% Low Density 7,674 50.20/0 MediuntDensity 409 2.7% High Density 319 2.1% Convuercial 700 4.60/a Neighborhood Retail Shopping 33 0.2°/a ConmmnityRetail Shopping 508 3.3% Hospitality General Business 102 0.70/0 Town Center 43 0.3% Transitional Town Center 14 0.1% Industrial 793 5.2°/0 Business Office Park 265 1.7% Planned Industrial 528 3.5% Parks, Recreation & Open Space 926 6.1% Right -of -Way 1,317 8.6% Lakes 2,396 15.7% SMSCTnnstLand 594 3.9% Total 15,281 100.00/0 Source: City of Prior lake Additional land area has been designated in the City for commercial and industrial uses. Table 5 shows a broader base comparison of the land area of existing land uses with the projected land use in 2030. As shown on the table, commercial uses are estimated to increase by 0.5%. Industrial uses are projected to increase by 2,0%. The industrial category includes the sub -categories of MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Mr. Ray Brandt Business/Office Park and Planned Industrial. The figures for 2030 include areas that would be annexed from Spring Lake Township according to the orderly annexation agreement. Conclusions The size of the property under consideration is 14.81 acres and the southern boundary of [lie parcels front on County Road 21. Allowing for right-of-way, the amount of property that is requested to be rezoned for commercial use is 14.13 acres. The remaining 0.68 acres is requested to be allocated to low density residential development. In considering the location of the subject parcels, the existing and planned future land uses, the level of use of the existing roadways at the intersection which are planned to be upgraded and the locations (existing and planned) of retail development in the City, we believe that the subject parcels are appropriate for use as limited convenience retail and small service office. According to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there is no land use currently in this area to accommodate neighborhood shopping that would serve the existing and fat ue residents and employees of this area. Hospitality and general business is planned for parcels further east. Transferring the 14.31 acres from industrial to commercial would have a very limited net affect on the total land area usage to 2030 and would provide for a limited amount of retail goods and services in the area as an amenity to the residential and industrial uses. It is our opinion that a limited amount of commercial development in this location would act as an amenity to the proposed land use and would be more attractive to companies that want to locate in this area as the vacant property is developed with the planned uses. MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. TABLC5 COMPARISON OR 2020 AND 2030 LAND 115 C DGS ICNATIONS City of Prior Lake 2006 2020 PLAN 2030 PLAN Percent Percent Land Use Acres of Total Acres ofTofal Residential 6,866 57.6% 8,555 56.0% Commercial 490 4.1% 700 4.6% Indostrial 387 3.2% 793 5.20/0 Parks, Recreation R Open Space 926 7.8% 926 6.1% Right -of -Way 993 83% 1,317 8.6% Lakes 1,656 13.9% 2,396 15.7% SMSCTmst Load 594 5.0"/0 594 3.9% Total 11,912 100.0% 15,281 100.0% Soaroe: City of Prior Lake Conclusions The size of the property under consideration is 14.81 acres and the southern boundary of [lie parcels front on County Road 21. Allowing for right-of-way, the amount of property that is requested to be rezoned for commercial use is 14.13 acres. The remaining 0.68 acres is requested to be allocated to low density residential development. In considering the location of the subject parcels, the existing and planned future land uses, the level of use of the existing roadways at the intersection which are planned to be upgraded and the locations (existing and planned) of retail development in the City, we believe that the subject parcels are appropriate for use as limited convenience retail and small service office. According to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there is no land use currently in this area to accommodate neighborhood shopping that would serve the existing and fat ue residents and employees of this area. Hospitality and general business is planned for parcels further east. Transferring the 14.31 acres from industrial to commercial would have a very limited net affect on the total land area usage to 2030 and would provide for a limited amount of retail goods and services in the area as an amenity to the residential and industrial uses. It is our opinion that a limited amount of commercial development in this location would act as an amenity to the proposed land use and would be more attractive to companies that want to locate in this area as the vacant property is developed with the planned uses. MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: PRESENTER: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: INTRODUCTION: 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 5B PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW GRADING AND EXCAVATION IN EXCESS OF 400 CUBIC YARDS AND A PUBLIC SERVICE STRUCTURE AS PART OF A SANITARY SEWER PROJECT FOR THE SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY JEFF MATZKE, PLANNER X YES NO -N/A JUNE 13, 2011 The Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community has applied for a conditional use permit to allow grading and excavation as part of a sanitary sewer project. A large amount of the grading will take place on a site located at 13901 Canterbury Road NW, northeast of the intersection of CSAH 42 and CSAH 83. The project calls for the construction of a forcemain sewer system to be placed from the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC) East Village residential area located along McKenna Road north of CSAH 42 to the SMSC Water Reclamation Facility on Orion Road. As part of the project a lift station is proposed to be located on a property northeast of the CSAH 42 and CSAH 83 intersection. PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Total Site Area: The site is 103 acres with a project impact area of approximately 1.5 acres. Topography: The large subject site varies in elevation from 895 MSL to 935 MSL. Vegetation: The site is largely vacant, undisturbed land with both wooded areas and open space grasslands. Wetlands: Wetlands are located on site around the proposed access drive. The proposed grading plan indicates wetland alterations. The applicant has submitted an application for wetland alterations to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for approval. Access: Access to the site is by an existing field road. The future access proposes to lessen the grade of the existing field access and create a permanent paved driveway in the same location. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Designation: This property is designated R -LD for Urban Low Density Residential use on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Zoning: The site area is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). A Public Service Structure is allowed within the R-1 Zoning District. Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpriorlakexom Tree Preservation: The applicant has identified over 1482 caliper inches of significant trees within the project corridor area alone with a proposed removal of 922 inches. While tree replacement is not required within areas of public utility lines, the applicant proposes to replace 300 inches of new trees within the corridor. ANALYSIS: Under Section 1101.509 (2) of the Zoning Ordinance, excavation of material exceeding 400 cubic yards of sand, gravel, or other material from the land shall be permitted by CUP. Details regarding the excavation project may include, but is not limited to, site plans which show the finished grade of the land after the excavation has been completed, the type of material to be extracted from the land, general maintenance of the site and adjacent area, and controls to be employed to limit the effect of wind or other elements on the site and the material extracted from the site. The CUP may impose conditions upon the owner of the land to be excavated and the person performing the excavation operation which will prevent damage to the community and adjacent landowners during the course of the excavation operation. Those conditions may impose restrictions in all areas affecting the excavation operation and the City may require a security to insure the conditions imposed and the completion of the work will be performed in the manner described in the plan and CUP. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) ANALYSIS: Section 1108.200 of the City Code sets forth the criteria for approval of a CUP. (1) The use is consistent with and supportive of the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Objective 1 under the goal of Infrastructure within the 2030 Comprehensive Plan is to provide for well-maintained streets, water distributions systems, sewage systems, and other municipal services. While this sewer project will service properties within the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community it will allow for the orderly handling of waste water within the Prior Lake, Shakopee, and SMSC communities. It will also decrease the current demand on the City of Prior Lake sanitary sewer system by rerouting waste water from the East Village area of the SMSC. (2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community as a whole. Based on staff review, the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The conditions of the approving resolution are intended to ensure ongoing protection of the community. (3) The use is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and the Use District in which the Conditional Use is located. Section 1101.509 of the Zoning Ordinance allows Grading, Filling and Land Reclamation as a Conditional Use within any zoning district. A public service structure is an allowed use within the R-1 Zoning District. The conditions set forth in the Zoning Ordinance will be met with the issuance of the Conditional Use permit. (4) The use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, services, or improvements which are either existing or proposed. The use will not have adverse impacts on governmental facilities. During the grading and fill work, the applicant will be responsible for maintaining the condition of the adjacent roads. (5) The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties in close proximity to the conditional use. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties in close proximity. The project is subject to the issuance of a County right-of-way permit which will address construction movement throughout the duration of the project. (6) The use is subject to the design and other requirements of site and landscape plans prepared by or under the direction of a professional landscape architect, or civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. The use will adhere to the design requirements of the City. (7) The use is subject to drainage and utility plans prepared by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota which illustrate locations of city water, city sewer, fire hydrants, manholes, power, telephone and cable lines, natural gas mains, and other service facilities. The applicant has submitted engineering plans identifying locations of other utilities and will coordinate with various governmental agencies including the City of Prior Lake, the City of Shakopee, Scott County, and the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission for completion of the project. (8) The use is subject to such other additional conditions which the City Council may find necessary to protect the general welfare, public safety and neighborhood character. Such additional conditions may be imposed in those situations where the other dimensional standards, performance standards, conditions or requirements in this Ordinance are insufficient to achieve the objectives contained in subsection 1108.202. In these circumstances, the City Council may impose restrictions and conditions on the CUP which are more stringent than those set forth in the Ordinance and which are consistent with the general conditions above. The additional conditions shall be set forth in the CUP approved by the City Council. Additional conditions to ensure the protection of the general health, safety and welfare of the public are included as part of the CUP. These conditions include approval of permits from other governmental agencies, approval of a City building permit for the lift station building and a submittal of a security to cover the costs of restoration. CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit request, subject to the following conditions: 1. The excavation must be done according to the approved plans. 2. The cleanup of fill material as a result of spills or general transportation of fill on any public road shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 3. The applicant shall record the Conditional Use Permit at Scott County no later than 60 days after approval. 4. All exterior faces of the public service structure shall meet the provisions of Subsection 11107.2200. 5. The Conditional Use Permit is subject to the issuance of required permits from all applicable governmental agencies. 6. Prior to any grading on the site, the applicant shall meet requirements set forth by the City Engineering Department in the memorandum dated June 8, 2011. 7. The CUP is valid for one year for excavation, but is revocable at any time for noncompliance with any condition contained herein. At the expiration of its one (1) year term, the property owner may make application to the City to renew the CUP. The initial approval of this CUP does not create any right, in law or equity, to the renewal thereof. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the CUP subject to the above conditions. 2. Table this item to a date specific, and provide the applicant with direction on the issues that have been discussed. 3. Deny the request based on specific findings of fact. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends Alternative #1. ACTION REQUIRED: A motion and second to approve Resolution 06-01 approving the CUP, subject to the listed conditions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 06-01 PC 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Project plans dated May 23, 2011 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 11-01 PC A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR GRADING AND EXCAVATION IN EXCESS OF 400 CUBIC YARDS AND A PUBLIC SERVICE STRUCTURE AS PART OF A SANITARY SEWER PROJECT FOR THE SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY WHEREAS, The Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 13, 2011, to consider an application from The Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community to allow grading and excavation of more than 400 cubic yards and a public service structure as part of a sanitary sewer project; and WHEREAS, Notice of the public hearing on said CUP was duly published in accordance with the applicable Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission proceeded to hear all persons interested in this CUP and persons interested were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the CUP; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission finds the proposed CUP is compatible with the stated purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as they relate to conditionally permitted uses, and further, that the proposed CUP meets the criteria for approval of CUP as contained in Section 1108.202 of the Zoning Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF PRIOR LAKE: The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The Planning Commission hereby adopts the following findings: a. The use is consistent with and supportive of the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Objective 1 under the goal of Infrastructure within the 2030 Comprehensive Plan is to provide for well-maintained streets, water distributions systems, sewage systems, and other municipal services. While this sewer project will service properties within the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community it will allow for the orderly handling of waste water within the Prior Lake, Shakopee, and SMSC communities. It will also decrease the current demand on the City of Prior Lake sanitary sewer system by rerouting waste water from the East Village area of the SMSC. b. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties in close proximity to the conditional use. Based on staff review, the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The conditions of the approving resolution are intended to ensure ongoing protection of the community. Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpriorlakexom c. The use is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and the Use District in which the Conditional Use is located. Section 1101.509 of the Zoning Ordinance allows Grading, Filling and Land Reclamation as a Conditional Use within any zoning district. A Public Service Structure is an allowed use within the R-1 Zoning District. The conditions set forth in the Zoning Ordinance will be met with the issuance of the Conditional Use permit. d. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, services, or improvements which are either existing or proposed. The use will not have adverse impacts on governmental facilities. During the grading and fill work, the applicant will be responsible for maintaining the condition of the adjacent roads. e. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties in close proximity to the conditional use. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties in close proximity. The project is subject to the issuance of a County right-of-way permit which will address construction movement throughout the duration of the project. f. The use is subject to the design and other requirements of site and landscape plans prepared by or under the direction of a professional landscape architect, or civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota, approved by the City Council and incorporated as part of the conditions imposed on the use by the City Council. The use will adhere to the design requirements of the City. g. The use is subject to drainage and utility plans prepared by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota which illustrate locations of city water, city sewer, fire hydrants, manholes, power, telephone and cable lines, natural gas mains, and other service facilities. The plans shall be included as part of the conditions set forth in the CUP approved by the City Council. The applicant has submitted engineering plans identifying locations of other utilities and will coordinate with various governmental agencies including the City of Prior Lake, the City of Shakopee, Scott County, and the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission for completion of the project. h. The use is subject to such other additional conditions which the City Council may find necessary to protect the general welfare, public safety and neighborhood character. Such additional conditions may be imposed in those situations where the other dimensional standards, performance standards, conditions or requirements in this Ordinance are insufficient to achieve the objectives contained in subsection 1108.202. In these circumstances, the City Council may impose restrictions and conditions on the CUP which are more stringent than those set forth in the Ordinance and which are consistent with the general conditions above. The additional conditions shall be set forth in the CUP approved by the City Council. Additional conditions to ensure the protection of the general health, safety and welfare of the public are included as part of the CUP. These conditions include approval of permits from other governmental agencies, approval of a City building permit for the lift station building and a submittal of a security to cover the costs of restoration. 3. The CUP is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: a) The excavation must be done according to the approved plans. b) The cleanup of fill material as a result of spills or general transportation of fill on any public road shall be the responsibility of the applicant. c) The applicant shall record the Conditional Use Permit at Scott County no later than 60 days after approval. d) All exterior faces of the public service structure shall meet the provisions of Subsection 11107.2200 e) The Conditional Use Permit is subject to the issuance of required permits from all applicable governmental agencies. f) Prior to any grading on the site, the applicant shall meet requirements set forth by the City Engineering Department in the memorandum dated June 8, 2011. g) The CUP is valid for one year for excavation, but is revocable at any time for noncompliance with any condition contained herein. At the expiration of its one (1) year term, the property owner may make application to the City to renew the CUP. The initial approval of this CUP does not create any right, in law or equity, to the renewal thereof. CONCLUSION Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to allow grading and excavation of more than 400 cubic yards and a public service structure as part of a sanitary sewer project. The contents of Planning Case File #EP 11-118 is hereby entered into and made a part of the public record and the record of the decision for this case. Passed and adopted this 13th day of June 2011 Brian Fleming, Commission Chair ATTEST: Jeff Matzke. Planner SMSC CR -83 UTILITY PROJECT LOCATION MAP Z:4- J Q J Z 0 SUBJECT PROPERTY D m Lu i -- z 06U z 140TH ST NW z �Lu WI L=D--P-ATNW HAAS U LAKE n U) NE V`\ Z (907.3) N 0 500 1,000 2,000 (J/\ Feet + —Al �/ PLAN REVISIONS DATE SHEET NUMBER I APPROVED BY 0 000 2000 SME FEET 1 INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS NOTE:ROMDEXISTING BY TY BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELDVERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TCOMMENCING CONS L CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED 8Y STATE 116 NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, i-800-252-11166 OR 651 -454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PIAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 1 Tell.. PA", PefenN CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA FORCEMAIN, SANITARY SEWER & LIFT STATION MAY, 2011 •. -- /� ` ISIATIM H LIFT IF15TAlIQ4 E YLIAGE -pSPOSAL AACA - —` T 11 1 � E EROPOSEo 5 SIG OFT 41A 1�CIn OF SHAKLEE aFSHAItOPEE CnOFP=!ANC II �f`Iy.l Ili Ij.t _I , TITLE SHEET 1.02 LEGEND 1.03-1.04 GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT fHELDOFFICE t I ; TABULATIONS 1.06-1.09 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS PROJECT MEA111OtitMEl!I� i� �,� ` / lD � } .. '• {� A �� 1ri i� 'II1.Il� k n 5 i�T / L ra71� r� Try r. I {i A• h- Alp BOLTON & MENK, INC. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 6A'CKATO, NN FA'RVONT, NM SLEEPY EYE, U.4 BURNSVELE, !Al Y.ALLMAR, M.4 CHAS", MN RAYSEY, 114 MAPL Yn . AW BRA�NERD, UN AYES, �A SHEETINDEX SHEET NO. TITLE SECTION 1: GENERAL 1.01 TITLE SHEET 1.02 LEGEND 1.03-1.04 GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT 1.05 TABULATIONS 1.06-1.09 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SECTION 2: NORTH CENTRAL LIFT STATION FORCEMAIN PLANS 2.01-2.12 FORCEMAIN PLANS SECTION 3: EAST VILLAGE LIFT STATION FORCEMAIN & GRAVITY SEWER PLANS 3.01-3.06 FORCEMAIN & GRAVITY SEWER PLANS SECTION 4: NORTH CENTRAL LIFT STATION PLANS 4.01 LIFT STATION SITE PLAN 4.02-4.XX LIFT STATION PLANS SECTION 5: OAKOTAH PARKWAY LIFT STATION MODIFICATION PLANS 5.01-5.XX LIFT STATION PLANS SECTION 6: SWPPP & RESTORATION PLANS 6.01-6,03 SWPPP 6,04-6.11 RESTORATION PLANS SECTION 7: TREE MANAGEMENT PLANS 7.01-7.06 TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN SECTION 8: TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS 8.01-8.06 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 75 PAGES D)F�(0rpQv]rr; I HEREBY CERTWY Her DdS PLAN, SPEOPEAP04. ORT �]�("AS NPREEPPARED BY ME P.20EESsONALDENG&EER UY R MR THEECT yLANS OF TAND HE CF II. . Y:E TM E� 2011 DAMEL A LONY.ES LC' no. 42]]9 DATE y--.__..__._..__—_-_... VALLEY VIEW ROAD E r r - � - - - _ _ I.. _ -..- - -- -'- PROPOSED NORTH CENTRAL LIFTSTATION CONCEPTUAL VALLEY VIEW�I=-< - - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _.. ( 7 1 I " �- 21 EXISTING EAST VILLAGE- 6_-__ LIFTSTATION _ VI - GE G( SUDDIV ON _ II _ CITY OF SHAKOPEE - 1 F CITY F PRIOR lN(E _ u 1 ' BREWER SUBDIVISION 1 I L t OFSHAKOPEE CITY CITYOFSHWCOPEE ;? / t .. - -'- - J.._-IIY ,.` .-•_,. ,. OF PRIORI R CITY Of PRIOR LAKE "s�-- _ XCELENERGY EASEMENT "--- 1 3; To, _ < ( i r NORTH RESIDE ODIVISION I .7V ` 1 � F r i 6. - -j UI,. ( 1 F LEGEND \✓ �) --- OPEN TRENCH PROPOSED FORCEMAIN-TRENCHLESCONSTRUCTION i r- - ®-----'----'-� PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER -� L ...... EXISTING EXISTING EAST VILLAGE LIFT STATION FORCEMAIN r` - CSAH42 CS - Y CLr• f� CSAR 42 AR 42 By BOLTON 8. MBNK, INCD. SMSC SOUTH SEWER DISTRICT MAP II`tgt Consulting Engineers & Surveyors p ypp app NTmVA 9FN WAIT GUR gE�KSN'MNN PHASE ONE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 3A FA45EY, LIN VML lot V, RN BRNNEXD, MR. IN PIES, N SCALE �� N:\suse\mloomwmIt\� av»xNsoPosa oxmwl>n�E ME Nw.oro s/x/N mm m I, i 1! i i r I - + LEGEND PROPOSED FORCEMAIN -OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION ---+8--- PROPOSED FORCEMAIN- TRENCHL CONSTTRUCTION PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER �[ G} C' �} L i qo '. I BOLTON 8. MENK, INC. CunsNliing Engineers & survey°., U �o sw SMSC SOUTH SEWER DISTRICT Row. wa "N MR �u WN MN MR M PHASE ONE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 3C RAlISEY, MN NhMW00D, NN BRNNEa NN /DIES, N SG1E FEET n\sew\nzio,»aV�wvisV�e� cxwiaaVlaorosu oaru \10"_vwa a t N%.WV 5/11/I1 1x3 W M1an 6 Vve.I, kc, 1010. M KyL N ---I - - i �► \\^_\•---_'' __ CRY OF SWJ(OPEE `__ �ytp_lC - l ; CRY OF PRJOR WE / - .'- v .,v(='__X,-.... '�. nv-'---,•`.- .— — . \ .Poi ' � _ /' '9 12.67' OW \7 TEtAPORARY .�`lATER EDG DIA EDGE \6 0 20 40 FL ELEVa889.0 / \\ ` ��(`�-/Sc4c FEET WATER EDGEETE1RAro. i ' \. \ COvcRErE w6`�� 1 /' •� P16 / ' �B ` EDGE PRmECT TREES ` 1"AT1/' 2015 SX. Of 4 P I� Of 50 1\- L" STAFON \ m 1=8]0.85 AY ROti / 18 UP SEWER 1 I H : - - _ 6RE CR9iDER 0 i Q��, \ - TOP=888.90 15-15- CAIP CULVERT RE SEWERS --- \ S \y' 11-873.52 I ) Q8- -871.00 R ) )- PROTECT TREE I II JJ W8E111111) 1. &TERARDII WIN WSVA EX. 1IE1D ROAD ACCESS II 12' PYC FORCEVIH! DR AY 1-6)3.65 L\ \ SEE SHEET 2.09 TEMPORARY I=8]3.85 N \ BEE \ U \ WEnANO/ WATER EDGE , s EE 3.oi \\ EDGE \\\\ '? WI [71984.3 ITWL (BACK TO RACK lz IOOYR STORMS)-986.29 ' V W , 1 aw r WATER EDGE -.i TEMPORARY\ ��\\ 1 X11 WETVJtD - +/' \ _ ��r E E� <—� --_j WATER EDGE i I=8]4.25 ------___-_ I 1=874.30 _ y - f I 1 IMAY 1 3 20.11 BOLTON 9, f\/1 E= INC. - '. rW<OFn,T -•' _ P�ORL $ RE IGE\TAL SA[tiTARY 5EYf R CVNSTRJCTIOA SME FEET C /! �j ✓2wVA/ Ll np --- in rs6 Consulting Engineers & Surveyors /d /A - lR if0. Ch tt Ear EVE ,1 )4•01g aEN. tN . D R.. �cE Au erluaa Vv et va it ^IU2TH CENTRAL LIFT STATION n\sv �:nveu a�wTm•ra ar. p.., o:/-ae i,.a[ or s.•z. s. ,, _ 2 e3 /„ I 1204a VAI - RF SF 1^a Y<P�a Y„iD, 1+1RD.. vc5. 'A __ , _— SSr FLA?Q GENERAL NOTES, 1. CONTRACTOR SMALL. USE PEISED CONSTRUCTION WHEREVER PRACTICAL TO TOTALIZE DISTURBED AREA. 2. ALL EXPOSED SON, MEAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON M POSSIBLE TO UNIT Sm EROSION BUT IN N'0 CASE LATER MEW FOURTEEN E111 MYS AFTO THE CONSTRUCTION A.CTMTY IN 1NE PORTIM OF THE SNE THAT MAS TEMPORARILY OR PERUMENILY CEASED. 3. THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO SURFACE WATER A) ENERGY DISSIPATION(POP RAP OR EROSION STASELMDEN MAT) A All OUTLET APRONS B) STMILRATION OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ORAIWE $WALES WITHIN 200' OF EDGE OF SITE OR CONNECTION TO SURFACE WATER (INCLUDING STORM SHYER INLETS) 4. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTROL SEDIMEW-LADEN SURFACE WATER FROM LEAYWO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. All U051UZED SEDIMENT THAT MVS MET WE CONSTRUCTION ZONE SMALL BE COLLECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AT NO ADDRIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. S. ALL STREETS MUST BE SWEPT WHEN ANY OFF -SDE SEDIMENT TT+ADKWG OCCURS OR AS DIRECTED By WE ENGINEER. G. SILT FENCE SMALL. FOLLOW AS CLOSE M POSSIBLE TO A SINGLE CONTOUR UNE 7. MEN SEDIMENT DEPOSITS IN WE WATERS OF WE STATE R MUST BE REMOVED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS. 8. All PENALTES ASSOMWO WIRD VIOLATION OF THE TIMES PERMIT SHNL. BE ASSESSED AGAINST WE CONTRACT. LEGEND .................. sLT FENCE TYPE WCHNE SLICED M d u ®m k8 A M m M 5!lT FENCE TYPE HEAVY WLY IIaET PgOIfCiIO'1 TEIf➢ORRRY ROCK W'. OU CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Z2+ 00, E, , SOD o I 1 PAW zorDSE«xeoiTnEW Gi EROSION CQYTROI GUNHEi It ,1 Za•x I, i` '�� ,`,Ea ..4�r yr in b)1 +V C '•� �p�M`IYfr.P }4R ')1 4`�• fT!S 1 E� �f � i i L E E YY V A� ti, .'f`✓`1S i'`$ Yt NVIOMOMMCq PES 'I 6 �� /h �{•Y o Nu NYDRO ftb-ml Tlk 3 EIUIGN TYPE E11lO SEED) Y Utz o ��ef Y.eTurvOnfPacrs 1 I I \I 11 0" '----_ ________________ CQ4SiflUCTro �IC _ PEftI(ANENT ROCK CHECK IA 1 •�u A' t, T 1 1 N ll!,liR SHAKOPEE MDE'NAKANTON SIOUX CONDRUN BOLTON 8E MHNK, INC. 'Ty s"En e.so e o=rr sr om. o ` e° AIA O SO 100E [-'eae -rT R +a "+ Consulting Engineers & Surveyors .. NORTH RESIDENTAL SAWTARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION s[u VA\RATO, !f4 faRVOW, NN SLEEPY DE. KN 6.10 SCALE FEEL -X y L BMI "' - av�� o BURNSYLLE V4 M LVA4. YN CHASKk YN x�snx\anome\wov o+s>s_Eao a.c cs/ao/sv++zss Pu esn., s v.•,. -. zou. e, az.,.. a.:...ea Lth 46585 +,i MAY 23, 2011 es uvsrc YN VAPLEWCOD, VN BBA.NERD, 04 AYES. IA EROSION CONTROL & TU RE ESTAQLISI-I iVENT I is i - TRUSTtAND Ir� CIT V OF SI IAI<OPEE L ITY OF PfiIOR f AKP ,Ir rI p I, l Ir I � i FEE tkND TRUST LAN tWALTERSTTM / r LITTLECROW DRIVE 1 -------------- - --- - --_ - w J ---------- _5- I LL It O" —la -- — i< i w t I —= I ee t.nND _ CROYl DRNE \11 • ,III . , � .;_ , I i ♦ � � --:�\ _ _ .4\ /._ -' _ _ I I % I � � /� It[ IANt> \ '� CITY 01: SHAKOPEE - \ r - __ .. �-. _ , -� _.- ..� r i t 1 Of PRIOR t AKt -7-, iL L i I •-� _ _ _ ____ - )f / NOTES: 1. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF THE TREE MANAGEMENT PIAN V1 Yl00DlAND TRAIL NW _ t I L LAND HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER I • k — -- THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE OR THE CRY OF PRIOR LAKE, J THERE ARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OMITS THAT ARE NOT CONSIDERED i f'\. •( j' r - I TO BE SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THERE THEY ARE EITHER LESS - THE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DOH) OR r. MAY BE O A SPECIES T IS NOT STED THE CITIES A. r r' \ / ACCEPTABLE SPIECIES DST. SEE THE PLAT! & PROFILE \ " SHEETS FOR A MORE ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. ET S3 CIRCLE 7JN _ 2. ALL TREES WITHIN E PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TH m M THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS OF REQUIRED OPEN TRENCH L CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED TO BE PROTECTED IN THE PLAN. s 3. TREES LOCATED ALXG THE PROPOSED FORCEM01 WHERE o LEGEND THE CONTRACTOROPTION OF PEN TRENCH s ,,.,,� 31' a DIRTHE ECTIONAL DRI DRILL , D INSTALLATION, AND -' "' • 1' �.3' THE CONTRACTOR CHOOSES OIL RILLNST ADRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNTIL _.I� rc F,L : g f . LAND THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED 0 /t �• t " \, ACCORDINGLY. t TRUST LAND 4. THE PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT ' 1, C IYOF SHAKOPEE $ TREES !US NOT CURRENTLY BEEN ESTAF3HSHED. ALL s REPLACMENT TREES WILL BE PLANTED WITHIN b MILES OF Iv - - - r.it l' QF 1'RI0k i AICA y _ _ -' - 3 THE CONSTRUCTION UMITS BASED OFF OF INPUT FROM THE -_ - CITY OF PRIOR THE CRY OF EE, AND THE L -, WV_ hpOADTRNL— _ i SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY..-- - 0 Iso 3w —\ SC0.E ® FEET cx ry ms a+s s.N1 l, a >,.rsc.m si`vi acsre e.ae I.r c wnxo >w.1:: x ,� A e„', ":•2 +n tie BOLTON 8. MENK, INC. Consulling Engineers & Surveyors VA\USO, - SHAKOPEE MDEVJAKANT0N SIOUX COMMUNITY x^'•` s:J NORTH RESIDENTIAL SANITARY SEV/ER CONSTRUCTIOfi G'2a'I.n h ve-t a NIr. t: Rql, R<\e..H AHCREW L BUP.^,E VN FA'R/OIN. 1/y S EEPI EYE IIN _ 7.01 w\sysc\OvmAs\Cd\mr)N_xre[i-teTen. usle+/xau re\x /v 46585 NAY 23, 2011 r", 17 BJR\SVitIE. 1!N N'.LL/AR, 1/N CH.t5K4 MN RAVSEY, 1:4 VA iE6000, 1/N pRAxERO, MN EVES. to TREE MANAGEMEN I PLAN OVERALL PLAN J 00 \., X FEL. LAND 10 62 10264 F12 oQ !, 1 14 YoC8026] 180287 17029 fz Q Q � fY _ 1 _. p� hoz s + .•1j r _. � --'- e - / \\ ----' —___ \ � 6 16961 -.. W �. 1 I ' 11� -II 1 < 16992 12 \\/ /� \ _ 'I 17016 [ 10 -' - -- \ 1/ [[ 16671 I ,� I ♦ ♦ 6 ♦[ [\ 16874 16872 16)266 16888 - ' 16871 16834 11 II II \\[ fy \\\ 166897 2 16 6 168)0 1 16)18 I 1116 08 36522 1 II I ♦\ ♦[ 6 co CD )6)96 16)250 [ - 16910 \ 6 \ i` 16)99 1 ` 1 = 4 I 1 \ \ 1689) �_ - -_-16BW--14838 __ 24 1976 -----------------LU _ ____________19_ 16800 0 J I I ♦ 1689) 14 8 1684] I ` 11 II \♦ t' 14 186856 8 W l o ♦ 1649 m o to `"I II /. .. _[[LU \ <- �14 14 I- <--'-- -- FEE �_ANL3—T66)5� <-....._._.___L_—111L_<----�-1-�<-J.- 1 1 I II + 6908 a --- 1 8__ ' 16905 2 16896 14 16879 _�� — - _ _ — -— _ 16848 -- — J --- 16812 __—_ ___ /!/-tea—,1 i 86]9 r' 10 16898 168]88 168'8 / 16810/// U 16811./ 6 86]8) it 1 �) a l/ 1684 6 6 1682) F, Q 16)81 6 901 16]14 I .1 NOTES: 168]6 1. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF THE TREE MANAGEMENT PIAN H AVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS i2 6 16 822 c G i6] B 16806 16768 1 SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER THE CRY OF SHAKOPEE OR THE CRY OF PRIOR LAKE.1 16866 14 1z 1 THERE ARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 16861 THAT ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THERE THEY ARE EITHER LESS 16892 IW621 16828 16 1 \ THE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH) OR MAY BE OF A SPECIES THAT IS 6 16)85 5 1 NOT LISTED ON THE CITIES ACCEPTABLE SPIECIES LIST. SEE THE PIAN & PROFILE 16 _ SHEETS FOR A MORE ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE 16891 16862 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 6 16698 8 1 1 2. ALL TREES WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS OF 1 1 I REQUIRED OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED UNLESS I OTHERWISE INDICATED TO BE PROTECTED IN THE PIAN. I i I + 1 3. TREES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPOSED FORCEMAIN WHERE THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE II• I OPTION OF OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION OR DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, AND THE I CONTRACTOR CHOOSES DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES I, I ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNTIL THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED I.- I i ACCORDINGLY. I 1 4. THE PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAS NOT CURRENTLY BEEN 1 ESTABLISHED. ALL REPLACMENT TREES WILL BE PLANTED WITHIN 5 MILES OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BASED OFF OF INPUT FROM THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, AND THE SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY. +1 I i nuc arum yr oaxl StRxnwe uu +µ.our lwvm us N St BOL7ORNSOM'5 MENK, INC. n SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY 51Ev o JD 60 `o`"``" vasa ea] �,K srz s�xvu ConEngineers 9 & Surve ors Y '� 02 ouar NORTH RESIDENTIAL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION SCALE FEET MAFA1RV01lT, MN SlEEP1' EYE, AIN 1 1 WMN Wluwl, ux twsKn, MHFF TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN E ' 08aTw k Vertu. eF. 201+, M xyw Rewn,9 0a9 os 20 NH t0:I2 Av 46685 VAY 2J, 2011 eu 77 W.MSEV.APIEN'OOD, AIN ORNNERD, MN 0.+AES, l4 FEF LAND W _. �.._ 4W ____ __�1 8 5 (.. 16812 16511/ 6 16]81 6 16780 ,6862 8 16 Ifi801 16 FEE LAND 0 30 w slI FEET 3 / i 16793 8 678] e t6790 14 16768 /2 166211 0 167]3 10 2 166361 12 16641 12 I 1 I i I I 3 I 1 I — r 1 MATCH( N - E6 SHEAT 7.04 I ` ; 1 , 1\ 1 FEE LANCE I I 46569 16568 1657006 \\\ 16573 16544 165]4 10 6 16600 t0 16547 116576 600 165]6 IU I 1 l 316 16575 I6 1 I 1 16580 J ( I f 16 f 658] 7 16592 l; 11 14661 ___ ____ _ _— ____.]/ i ) cil 16538 _ I 6 16541 // 16526 1 16546 12 _ �y 34 1972 j) 0 10 4B` 16598 16540 16515 qq 12 a LO 16578 16 15rL—1 — — - 13-- i33 "V 16645 �. 7..�I(6}5_.,._._-2W,9--C.._ ..' 843� 1651i0Y i 1 ___ ---------------------------- 6 __________________________6 l — 6586 14 16585 % /( 1 16]59 6 6 16)58 9 16506 1651) 6 NOTES: I. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF THE TREE MANAGEMENT PIAN HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER THE CITY OF S14AKOPEE OR THE CITY OF PRIOR LACE. 16762 THEREARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMBS 26 1920 6501 THAT ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THERE THEY ARE EITHER LESS 16]6} 14 THE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DDH) OR MAY BE OFA SPECIES THAT IS e NOT LISTED ON THEE CITIES ACCEPTABLE SPIUST. SEE THE PIAN PROFILE OF T 16537 SHEETS FOR A MORE ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE 12 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 16536 2. ALL TREES WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS OF 16642 6 REQUIRED OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED UNLESS l0 165}} 6 OTHERWISE INDICATED TO BE PROTECTED IN THE PLAN.. 16532 3. TREES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPOSED FORCEMNN WHERE THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE 6 OPTION OF OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION OR DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, AND THE 16531 CONTRACTOR CHOOSES DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES 6 ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNRL THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ACCORDINGLY. 4. THE PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAS NOT CURRENTLY BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL REPLACMENT TREES WILL BE PLANTED WITHIN 5 MILES OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BASED OFF OF INPUT FROM THE CITY OF PRIOR WEE, THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, AND THE SHAKOPEE MDEAVAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY. want 4 .r rvu ms w, acw�m4 w wca us suv� Tlr=g EETN Sc MHNK. INC. ""' "` SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY EnAIRfiars &SurveyorsNORTH RESIDENTIAL SANITARY SEVIER CONSTRUCTION VN FABY.ONT. M01 BLEEPY EYE, MN 7.03�"' eV LLE, MN Veers w9 rveyor .wTREE MANAGEMENTPLAN VAY 23, 2011 VAPlENY1p0, MN BRVNFRO. MN AYES, L4 16E lfi6]0 12 68 16631 18 1664 16649 16796'66. 28 166. 8 N 1679] 18 1 36 2 CJ 167 98 '22 , I 16 )95 16 20' ` 11 617 I- 6800756 l \ W _. �.._ 4W ____ __�1 8 5 (.. 16812 16511/ 6 16]81 6 16780 ,6862 8 16 Ifi801 16 FEE LAND 0 30 w slI FEET 3 / i 16793 8 678] e t6790 14 16768 /2 166211 0 167]3 10 2 166361 12 16641 12 I 1 I i I I 3 I 1 I — r 1 MATCH( N - E6 SHEAT 7.04 I ` ; 1 , 1\ 1 FEE LANCE I I 46569 16568 1657006 \\\ 16573 16544 165]4 10 6 16600 t0 16547 116576 600 165]6 IU I 1 l 316 16575 I6 1 I 1 16580 J ( I f 16 f 658] 7 16592 l; 11 14661 ___ ____ _ _— ____.]/ i ) cil 16538 _ I 6 16541 // 16526 1 16546 12 _ �y 34 1972 j) 0 10 4B` 16598 16540 16515 qq 12 a LO 16578 16 15rL—1 — — - 13-- i33 "V 16645 �. 7..�I(6}5_.,._._-2W,9--C.._ ..' 843� 1651i0Y i 1 ___ ---------------------------- 6 __________________________6 l — 6586 14 16585 % /( 1 16]59 6 6 16)58 9 16506 1651) 6 NOTES: I. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF THE TREE MANAGEMENT PIAN HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER THE CITY OF S14AKOPEE OR THE CITY OF PRIOR LACE. 16762 THEREARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMBS 26 1920 6501 THAT ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THERE THEY ARE EITHER LESS 16]6} 14 THE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DDH) OR MAY BE OFA SPECIES THAT IS e NOT LISTED ON THEE CITIES ACCEPTABLE SPIUST. SEE THE PIAN PROFILE OF T 16537 SHEETS FOR A MORE ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE 12 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 16536 2. ALL TREES WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS OF 16642 6 REQUIRED OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED UNLESS l0 165}} 6 OTHERWISE INDICATED TO BE PROTECTED IN THE PLAN.. 16532 3. TREES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPOSED FORCEMNN WHERE THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE 6 OPTION OF OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION OR DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, AND THE 16531 CONTRACTOR CHOOSES DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES 6 ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNRL THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ACCORDINGLY. 4. THE PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAS NOT CURRENTLY BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL REPLACMENT TREES WILL BE PLANTED WITHIN 5 MILES OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BASED OFF OF INPUT FROM THE CITY OF PRIOR WEE, THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, AND THE SHAKOPEE MDEAVAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY. want 4 .r rvu ms w, acw�m4 w wca us suv� Tlr=g EETN Sc MHNK. INC. ""' "` SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY EnAIRfiars &SurveyorsNORTH RESIDENTIAL SANITARY SEVIER CONSTRUCTION VN FABY.ONT. M01 BLEEPY EYE, MN 7.03�"' eV LLE, MN Veers w9 rveyor .wTREE MANAGEMENTPLAN VAY 23, 2011 VAPlENY1p0, MN BRVNFRO. MN AYES, L4 FEF LAND 16712 0- 166966 6 16691 6.4 Lij Lu Lp -- 1672641 .a -II --_--il I _il._. I� -_. II __111____il / ___ __-___ �.______ ___ e.;K ______ ______________________ ___t`______ _______ _ -ST 6 J / o - C) 16E�1 f �. F 6 16]08 6 cc 16688 I �I 106]09 G 16692 6.4 I I I � 16690 6 MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET 7,. 5 x I NOTES: I 166&9 1\ 1. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF THE TREE MANAGEMENT PIAN HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS I - SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE OR THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE. I / THERE ARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS I THAT ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THERE THEY ARE EITHER LESS I 16663THE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DDH) OR MAY BE OF A SPECIES THAT IS I 1 6 I __ \�I � � NOT LISTED ON THE CITIES ACCEPTABLE SPIECIES LIST. SEE THE PLAN &PROFILE ,(� I = CITY, OF SI IAI<oIDI I _ SHEETS FOR A MORE ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. O,o I T (I'll I O PR1,013 FAIN, 2. ALL TREES WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS OF � � 1 1 I REQUIRED OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED UNLESS _ _ OTHERWISE INDICATED TO BE PROTECTED IN THE PLAN. FEL- t..AND N 6O� , �) 3. TREES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPOSED FORCEMAIN WHERE THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE i0. J / t i OPTION OF OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION OR DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, AND THE I Itt {\\ I CONTRACTOR CHOOSES DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES X 1 O , i1 t \ I ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNTIL THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ��( �C) ACCORDINGLY. 2 Z I ix I I I 4. ETHEST PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAS NOT CURRENTLY BEEN / n ESTABLISHED. ALL S BASED OF TREES WILL R PLANTED Y OF 5 IR L OF THE i 9� % / TRUST _ I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BASED OFF OF INPUT FROM THE CRY OF PRIOR W(E, THE Citt OF / LT' I r;� SHAKOPEE, AND THE SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY. >' '01 C7 / LAND/ 1 FEE LAND =tT t, n _nr65P ` I o ------------------ ------10 _. / II'-'--- ------ I z 19 I { - -------ttJ - - - - ---'" MAT�L�T! - EE SHERT 7.03 z CH50 — ---- _ - - Li-To,009 F FEI LAND .� I I _ , IMID(l4¢�fTSMI TMs n^�Q1YJip�04 P°pi11AS °°T"`£O Sm"' OLTON 8a M°oS SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY sl¢n sr v2 ox uux yr otttt scaxsul ua Twtl u°ao-xr uww ns � BENK, INC. 0 30 60 rrorm.Yw ou4m 4xn >a ws u ra sw2 or w.>wu w,n Consulfne En Ineers & Sarva ors _ 9 Y NORTHRESIDENTIAL SANITARY SEIYER CONSTRUCTION 7,04 SCNE iEET PNDREW D om M URITISM1IlE. MNA'RNOW Uw' M BL �IwSKA. NNN CBdta+a vsra Irc, son, b aqw 8uen.4 uew 46585 ,. �NAY 23, 2011 6YD RAMSLY. MN NAnL m*w. MN IV uN ales, w TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN 1l\SVSL\CIt10133D\r2D\101)JB_1RFL-W1.6A0 OS 20 2011 10.13 !H FEE LAND LITTLE CROW DRIVE FEE LANG -------------------------------------- 605 ,�--------------\ --�___, ------ _._.-I11_- II _1. It � . -11 1----- --"II 1 ...___ _, / CITY OF SHAKOI EE ----------- �- �_ -II-- �u—it- 6 -------IT 0 i / / I TRUST LAND 1 ' W r W N N U NOTES: 1. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF EE SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER THE CITY OO OPRIOR R THE CITY OF IOR LAKE. THERE ARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THE ARE IN DIAMETER AT BREASTNSIDERED TO BE NHEIGHT (D H) OR BECAUSE THERE HEHEY OF ARE SPECIES THATIS NOT LISTED SHEETS FOR A CACCEPTABLE THE CITIES MOREACCURA EDECTION OF ETHEI TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENTTOE PLAN & TOLE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 2. ALL TREES WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS Of OTHERWIUIRED SE NDICA EOPEN ED TO 13ENCH NPROTECffD IN SHATHE PLANL BE ED AND GRUBBED UNLESS TRUST LAND ,. �l l 4. I / TREES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPOSED FORCEMAN WHERE THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION OR DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, AND THE CONTRACTOR CHOOSES DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNTIL THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ACCORDINGLY. THE PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAS NOT CURRENTLY BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL S BASED OF TREES WILL R PLANTED WITHIN 5 MILES E, THE = j CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BASED E OF INPUT FROM X CDM NI PRIOR LAKE, THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, AND THE StTN(OPEE MDEWAKAMON SIOUX COMMUNITY. Y.A'+I A`O 114V 1/IIA d;Y l<nSfD /18 0 30 60 a,ar�..tu o1z� uow>x ws a rrt swc a4 a Bw�e, SCALE REE W2Di OB o�m '.-yOlm OS/m/mlI ie12 µ 46585 _.. e�x MAY 23, 2011 py. BOLTON 8& MEN K. INC. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors IA \ \1 i i LITTLE CROW DRIVE FEE LANG -------------------------------------- 605 ,�--------------\ --�___, ------ _._.-I11_- II _1. It � . -11 1----- --"II 1 ...___ _, / CITY OF SHAKOI EE ----------- �- �_ -II-- �u—it- 6 -------IT 0 i / / I TRUST LAND 1 ' W r W N N U NOTES: 1. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF EE SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER THE CITY OO OPRIOR R THE CITY OF IOR LAKE. THERE ARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THE ARE IN DIAMETER AT BREASTNSIDERED TO BE NHEIGHT (D H) OR BECAUSE THERE HEHEY OF ARE SPECIES THATIS NOT LISTED SHEETS FOR A CACCEPTABLE THE CITIES MOREACCURA EDECTION OF ETHEI TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENTTOE PLAN & TOLE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 2. ALL TREES WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS Of OTHERWIUIRED SE NDICA EOPEN ED TO 13ENCH NPROTECffD IN SHATHE PLANL BE ED AND GRUBBED UNLESS TRUST LAND ,. �l l 4. I / TREES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPOSED FORCEMAN WHERE THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION OR DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, AND THE CONTRACTOR CHOOSES DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNTIL THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ACCORDINGLY. THE PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAS NOT CURRENTLY BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL S BASED OF TREES WILL R PLANTED WITHIN 5 MILES E, THE = j CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BASED E OF INPUT FROM X CDM NI PRIOR LAKE, THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, AND THE StTN(OPEE MDEWAKAMON SIOUX COMMUNITY. Y.A'+I A`O 114V 1/IIA d;Y l<nSfD /18 0 30 60 a,ar�..tu o1z� uow>x ws a rrt swc a4 a Bw�e, SCALE REE W2Di OB o�m '.-yOlm OS/m/mlI ie12 µ 46585 _.. e�x MAY 23, 2011 py. BOLTON 8& MEN K. INC. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors IA \ I� �� 1' t III ! I \ I; S / I /t I f;l II / III I I ! t 1 i I Ir f I r I II / I it ! Ic I/ ! I I / I / I / / II NITY I sl JG.1CI{ 4VN3IKUGIIIJN 7.05 TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY OF SHAKOPEE-SIGNIFICANT TREES TO DE PROTECTED NOTES: 1. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE OR THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE. THERE ARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THERE THEY ARE EITHER LESS THE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH) OR MAY BE OF A SPECIES THAT IS NOT LISTED ON THE CITIES ACCEPTABLE SPECIES LIST. SEE THE PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS FOR A MORE ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, 2. ALL TREES WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS OF REQUIRED OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED TO BE PROTECTED IN THE PLAN. 3. TREES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPOSED FORCEMAN WHERE THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION OR DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, AND THE CONTRACTOR CHOOSES DIRECTIONAL GRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNTIL THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ACCORDINGLY. 4. THE PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAS NOT CURRENTLY BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL REPLACMENT TREES WILL BE PLANTED WITHIN 5 MILES OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BASED OFF OF INPUT FROM THE CRY OF PRIOR LAKE, THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, AND THE SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE -SIGNIFICANT TREES TO HE REMOVED IF TREE TREE to SPECIES DBH IN) CORRIDOR RANK,NG HERITAGE REPV.CEMEM RATIO REPLACEMENT INCHES 1 11134 ELM. SIBERIAN 6.0 GOOD N 0 0 2 11009 ASPEN 100 GOOD N 0 0 3 11019 ASPEN 11.5 GOOD N 0 _ 0 4 11020 ASPEN 110 GOOD H 0 0 5 nt25 DOxELOER 80 GOOD N 0 0 6 11139 DO%ELOER 7.5 6500 N 0 0 fib 11160 BO%ElOER 10.0 GOOD tV ll 0 8 11181 BO%ELOER 6.0 C000 N O 0 9 11182 BOXELOER 80 GOOD H O 0 20 11192 BOXELOER 6.IT GOOD N O _ 0 It 11 193BOXELCER 80 GOOD N 0 0 12 11195 BO%ELDER 8.0 GOOD N 0 0 13 11203 HACKBERRF 60 GOOD N O 0 14 11205 EDI, AMERICAN 6.0 GOOD N O 0 15 11206 ELM. SISERIM' 8.5 GOOD N _ 0 0 I6 11209 ELM, AMERICAN GO GOOD _ _ N 0 0 i) 11212 ELM, SIBERIAN 19.0 GOODN NI N 0 0 18 11214 ELM, AMERICAN IAO .. GOOD ........ N 0 0 19 11215 EUA, AMERICAN 6.5 GOOD N 0 0 20 11216 ELM, AVERICAN _ 60 GOOD I N 0 0 21 11217 EUA, SBER�AN 60 GOOD N 0 0 22 16689 13OXELDER _ 8.0 GOODN N 0 0 23 16690 BO%ELOER 60 GOOD N 0 0 24 16692 BO%ELDER 2fi0 GOOD N 0 0 25 ___ 18708 BOXELDER 6.0 I GOOD 1 ti 0 0 26 16721 BOxELOER IoGj GOOD I N 0 0 NOTES: 1. TREES SHOWN AS PART OF THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS SIGNIFICANT TREES FOR EITHER THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE OR THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE. THERE ARE MANY TREES THAT EXIST INSIDE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THERE THEY ARE EITHER LESS THE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH) OR MAY BE OF A SPECIES THAT IS NOT LISTED ON THE CITIES ACCEPTABLE SPECIES LIST. SEE THE PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS FOR A MORE ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE TREES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, 2. ALL TREES WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS THAT ARE ALSO IN AREAS OF REQUIRED OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED TO BE PROTECTED IN THE PLAN. 3. TREES LOCATED ALONG THE PROPOSED FORCEMAN WHERE THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF OPEN TRENCH CONSTRUCTION OR DIRECTIONAL DRILL INSTALLATION, AND THE CONTRACTOR CHOOSES DIRECTIONAL GRILL INSTALLATION, SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES ALONG THOSE CORRIDORS UNTIL THE TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ACCORDINGLY. 4. THE PROPOSED FINAL LOCATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAS NOT CURRENTLY BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL REPLACMENT TREES WILL BE PLANTED WITHIN 5 MILES OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BASED OFF OF INPUT FROM THE CRY OF PRIOR LAKE, THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, AND THE SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE -SIGNIFICANT TREES TO HE REMOVED IF TRE[ I TREE I 10 I SPECIES 06H IN CONDITION HERITAGE REPaCDIE%T Mm REPaCEIJEUT LACHES 51 16509 HICKORY, BITTERNVI 10.0 GOOD N 1:2 500 54 16515 IROXVI000 6.0 GOOD N 1:2 300 56 16517 IRONWOOD 60 GOOD N b2 3.00 61 16526 OAK. BUR 32.0 GOOD YES 1:2 16.00 64 16530 RONYIOOD 6.0 GOOD N 1:2 300 65 16531 BASSWOOD 6.0 GOOD N 1:2 300 fib 16532 BASSWOOD 60 FAR N 1:2 300 67 16533 HICKORY. BTTERNVi 60 GOLNI N 1.2 300 69 16535 HICKORY, BTTERNUT )0 GOOD JJ 1:2 3.50 70 16536 ASH, GREEN 80 FAR N 1:2 CCTO 71 16537 HICKORY, BIITERNUT 11.0 GOOD N 1:2 5.50 72 16538 BASSWOOD 6.0 GCOD N 1:2 300 74 16540 BASSYYMO 12.0 Gem N 1:2 GOO 75 1 16541 BASSWOOD 12.0 GOOD N 1.2 600 77 16546 ELM. RED 7.0 GOOD 14 1 1-2 3.50 79 16550 HCKORY, SITIERNUT 8.0 GOOD N 1:2 40D 85 86 16574 HCKORY, BOTERNUT 16575 OAK, REO 100 14.0 FAIR GOOD NI N 1:2 1:2 500 7.00 87 16576 HICKORY, BITTER14UT 7.0 GOOD N 1:2 3.50 68 16578 BASSWOOD 7.0 GOOD N 13 3.50 89 16579 OAK, RED 13.5 GOOD N 1:2 635 91 _ 16581 OAK, RED 14.0 _ GOOD N 1:2 7.00 93 16585 BASSWOOD 6.0 GOOD N 1:2 3.00 94 15586 BASSWOOD 14.0 GOOD N 1:2 7.00 95 16587 BASSWOOD 1.0 GOOD N 1-2 3.50 96 16588 BASSWOOD :6.0 GOOD N 1:2 800 98 1165921REDCEDAR ISO GOOD _ N 1:2 9.00 99 16598 RDNWOOD 16.0 GOOD N L2 800 104 _ 16608 OAR, BUR 320 GOOD YES 1:2 1600 105 16617 BASSIWODD 8.0 GOOD N 1:2 4.00 106 16618 SASSDOOD 80 GOOD N 1:2 4.00 107 16621 BASSWOOD 8.0 GOOD N 1:2 400 112 16630 OAK. RED 120 GOOD N 1:2 GOD 113 16631 OAK, RED 160 GOOD H 1:2 800 114 16632 ASH, GREEN 12.0 GOOD N 1:2 6.00 115 16633 BASSWOOD GO POOR N 1:2 3.00 116 16634 OAA, RED 130 GOOD N 1:2 6.50 118 16536 OAK. RED 41.0 GOOD N 1:2 _ 5.50 119 16639 OAK, REO 14.01 GOOD N 1:2 7.00 120 116641 IOAX, REO 115 GOOD N 1:2 6.75 121 16642 BASSWOOD 10.0 GOOD N 11 5.00 122 16643 BASSWODD 9.0 GOOD N 1.2 4.50 124 16645 8ASS6'ODD 60 GOOD _ N 1:2 3.00 125 16646 BASSROOD 7.0 GOOD R 1:2 3.50 154 16768 ASH. GREEN 120 GOOD _ _ N 1:2 6.00 156 16773 PASS%rOm 10.0 _ GODD N 1:2 500 159 16781 BASSWOOD 60 GOOD _ N 1:2 3.00 160 T6785 ASH. GREEN 8.0 GOOD N L2 4.00 162 16787 ASH. GREEN TO FAR N 1:2 3.50 163 16790 ASH, GREEN 130 GOOD N _ 1:2 6.50 164 16793 BASS50DD 60 GOOD N _ 12 3.00 165 16795 ASH, GREEN 14.01 GOOD I N 1:2 7.00 166 116796 JASH, GREEN 22.0 GOOD N 1:2 11.00 167 16797 ASH, GREEN 180 GOOD N 1:2 9.00 168 16798 ASH. GREEN 14.0 GOOD N 1:2 7.00 169 16799 ASH, GREEN 10.0 FAIR N _ 1:2 5.00 170 168N ASH. GREEN 14.0 GOOD N _ L2 7.00 171 _ 16801 ASH, GREEN 14.0 GOOD H 1:2 7.00 172 16802 ASH, GREEN 130 GOOD N 1:2 6.50 181 16834 MAPLE, SLYER 6.0 GOOD N 12 3.00 182 16838 BASSWOOD 20.0 GOOD N 1:2 10.00 186 16843 ASH, GREEN 7.0 FAR N 1:2 3.50 189 16847 ASH, GREEN 130 GOOD N _ _ L2 6.50 190 16849 ASH, GREEN 14.0 GOOD N 1:2 7 GO 191 16856 REOCEOA9 8.0 GOOD H 1:2 400 196 16863 BASSWOOD 17.0 GOOD N 1:2 8.50 198 16870 BASSWOOD 80 GOOD N 1:2 4.00 199 16871 BASSOOD 160 GOOD I N 1.2 am 200 16872 ASH, GREEN 6.0 GOOD N 1:2 300 201 16873 BASSWOOD6.0 GOOD N 1:2 300 202 IE874 BASSVCGD _ CO GOOD N L2 400 16875 HICKORY, BIITERNUT 8.0 FAR N 1!2 400 _703 209 16883 ASN, GREEN 20.0 GOOD N 1 2 _ _1000 210 16584 ASH, GREEN 120 FAR _ N 1:2 6.00 213 16893 BASSY:OOD 125 GOOD N 1:2 s_25 215 _ 16895 BASSWOOD 13.0 0000 N 13 61" 216 16896 BASSV00D 14.0 G000 N 1:2 7.00 217 16897 BASSv"D 140 GOOD N1:2 _ -OD 218 16899 IRONWOOD 100 FAR N tT 500 230 16981 REDCEDA4 8.0 GOOD N 22 4.00 231 16985 RECCEOAR 60 GOOD N l2 3.00 232 16992 RECCEOAR 18.0 GOOD N L2 _ 9.00 SUBTOTAL 46F25 AL104ABLE TREE REMOVAL W/ NO REPLACEMENT (357. PER 1107 2105 2u 161.44 TOTAL CALIPER L\'CHES TO BE REPLACED 29981 PRIOR LAKE -SIGNIFICANT TREES fi )RCE TREE ID SPECIES CDH ON) CONDITION_ HERITAGE RF-- _PJ.C[VENT RAPD REPJ.:E4'Da INCHES 1 10262 ASH, GREEN 10.0 FAR N 0 0 2 10264 OAK, RED 12.5 GOOD N 0 0 3 10265 REDCEDA4 7.0 GOOD N _ 0 0 5 10267 CAK, RED 7.5 GOOD _ _ N _ 0 0 6 10287 CAK, REO 9.0 GOOD N 0 0 16 11)37 CAK, OUR 34.5 GOOD_ _ N _ 0 0 73 16519 BASSWOOD 220 POOR N 0 0 7 16544 IROSAOOD 6.0 GOOD N _ - 0 0 JB8 16547 100 GOOD N 0 0 80 84SVOOD 16567 BASSIWOO VERY POOR N 0 0 81 16568 BASS100D &.0 6.0 FAIR N 0 0 82 16569 8.0 GOOD N _ 0 0 83 16570 IRODAODD _ 8.0 6000 N 0 0 81 16573 HICKORY, BItiERNUT HICKORY, 100 G000 N _ _ 0 0 100 16600 BASSWOOD 160 FAIR N 0 0 102 16601 84SSNMD 14.0 GOOD N 0 0 102 0BASSWWOOD 8 .0 GOOD N _ 0 0 103 166033 BASSWOOD 166 11.0 GOD) N 0 0 126 1660 OAK, REO 12.0 GOOD N 0 0 127 16648 BASSWOOD 8.0 GOOD N 0 0 128 16649 OAK, RED 80 GODD N 0 0 129 16653 BASSWOOD 6.0 GOOD N 0 0 131 16655 BASSWOOD 80 GOOD N 0 0 150 16758 BASSWOOD 7.0 GOOD N 0 _ 0 151 1689 BASSWOOD 6.0 GOODY _ 0 0 152 16762 OAK, MR 24.0 GOOD N 0 0 153 16763 IRONWDOD 7.0 GOOD N 0 0 158 16780 MAPLE, SU -AR 9.0 GOOD N 0 0 A4 16811 BASSWOOD GO FA'R N 0 0 175 16812 HASSV,GOD 60 FAIR N_ _ 0 0 177 16822 HICKORY. DITTERNUT 130 GOOD N _ _ 0 0 178 16826 ASH, GREEN 10.0 GOOD N _ 0 0 479 16827 IROWHOOD 7.0 GOOD_ _ N 0 0 180 16828 I.40N1WOOD 8.5 GOOD _ N 0 0 184 16840 BASSWOOD 6.5 GOOD N 0 0 187 116844 1 BASSWOOD 13.0 _ GOOD N 0 0 188 _ 11045 1 R4SSYlOm 8.0 FAR N 0 0 193 26860 oNsswu00 6.5 GOOD N 0 0 194 16861 BASSIWOOD 11.0 _ GOOD N 0 0 195 26862 HCKORe. BBTERNUT 7.5 GOOD N 0 0 204 16876 BASSY1000 12.0 GOOD R 0 0 205 16877 BASSFW0OD 7.0 GOOD N 0 O 206 16878 8ASSe00D 6.0 FAIR N 0 0 207 16879 FSH, GREEN 11.0 GOOD N 0 0 208 16880 HSKORY, IRMSNUI 6.5 PAIR N 0 0 212 16891 HCKOW, OI7ERNUT 6.0 GOOD N 0 0 212 16892 PASSAOm _ 6.0 GOOD N 0 0 221 16905 BASSWOOD 11.0 GOOD N 0 0 222 _ 16906 IRONWOOD_ 0.0 FAR N 0 0 224 16910 ASH, GREEN 6.0 GOOD N 0 0 2]4 A016 REDCEDA4 100 FAR _ .1 0 _ 0 237 17029 REDCEDA4 12.0 GWD N 0 0 238 17046 RECCECAR 8.0 _ DEAD N 0 0 D 30 �D R ov`i.:v 11.11, lll° .«" �, ."ox+t'Et^ice" .cssav .n ,Yo I..Du Al u.s el It i,ol er •.Isms ---- BOLTON 8a ME=N K, IND. Consulling Engineers & Surveyors .n s _ SHAKOPEE MCEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY NORTH RESIDENTIAL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION s"ELT 17.06 h'•• ANDREW L. BUDGE n're> J I_I } I TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN SCALE FEE LANDTSN 'AIIKATO, AIN FA'RVO%T, TIN SLEEPY EYE. MN JTUROSYLLE, MN WILLVA4. MJ CHASKA, M4 3s9 • G ,1v1., e< iJt A: Ryt Ruo.ef H\s+m\ o \ \magi 1R_L vlon9 vs/70/IOo 0. 7 Ae .<na 46585 u¢ VAT 13, 2011 OY RA/SEY. MN MAPLEWOOD. VN BR0.RERD, MN AVE$, a I ' T ' Date: June 8, 2011 To: Community Development and Natural Resources Department From: Engineering Department— Larry Poppler, City Engineer Subject: SMSC —City Project 411-118 Memo The Engineering Department reviewed the Final Plat plans for the subject project with a plan date of May 23, 2011 and have the following comments. General 1. The wetland process must be followed for the wetland impacts on the project. A technical evaluation panel must review the wetland impacts to make sure the wetland conservation act is being followed. As the LGU for the wetlands, the City must pass an ordinance for those wetland impacts. 2. A Scott County Right of Way permit is needed for all work within the County Right of Way. 3. A separate building permit is needed for the lift station work. 4. Work is shown within the Xcel Energy easement areas and permission from Xcel is needed for that work. 5. The City will require storm water treatment. Please have the applicant work directly with Ross Bintner regarding logical treatment options. 6. For work involving the CUP, security in the amount of $2,000 per acre disturbed is required. The security can be released at the conclusion of the project, once vegetation has been re-established. 7. As a private facility, the City has not evaluated the materials or function of the proposed piping, manholes, or lift station components. Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 /wwwxityofpriorlakexom AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: SITE ADDRESS: PREPARED BY: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: INTRODUCTION 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 5C CONSIDER VARIANCES TO ALLOW SUBDIVISION OF A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY INTO TWO LOTS IN THE R-2 (LOW -MEDIUM DENSITY) ZONING DISTRICT 4853 BEACH STREET JEFF MATZKE, PLANNER YES _NO -N/A JUNE 13, 2011 Beth Berggren is requesting variances in order to subdivide a residential property located at4 853 Beach Street NE into two lots. The property is located along the northern shores of Lower Prior Lake, east of Rosewood Road NE and west of Bluebird Trail NE. The property currently contains two principal residential structures. In order for the newly platted properties to be in conformance within City ordinance, the following variances are required: Lot 1, Block 1, BERGGREN BEACH A 18.5 foot variance from the required 90 foot minimum lot width for a riparian lot in the R-1 District. (Section 1104.302 (3)) A 4.4 foot variance from the required 10 foot minimum side yard setback. (Section 1102.505 (1)) Lot 2, Block 1, BERGGREN BEACH A 4.6 foot variance from the required 10 foot minimum side yard setback. (Section 1102.505 (1)) -7eTdS�3:1�1�1� I� The property is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential), and is guided R -LD (Urban Low Density) on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Two principal residential structures currently exist on the property. DISCUSSION The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into two residential properties. Currently two single family dwellings exist as a nonconformity on the property. By city ordinance no more than one principal building is allowed on one lot (Section 1101.501 (4)). The applicant has proposed a driveway easement along the proposed western property line of Lot 2 to allow for the continued use of the existing driveway for Lot 1 and for possible extension of the driveway Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpriorlakexom to the rear yard of Lot 1 for a future garage. Due to addition of the proposed property line between the two principal structures the applicant will be required to convert the west exterior wall of multi -unit dwelling on Lot 2 to a fire wall in conformance with the International Building Code. ANALYSIS Variance Hardship Findings Section 1108.400 states that the Board of Adjustment may grant a variance from the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, provided that: 1. There are extraordinary conditions or circumstances, such as irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of the lot or exceptional topographical or physical conditions which are peculiar to the property and do not apply to the other lands within the neighborhood or the same Use. Due to the narrowness of the existing lot variances from the sideyard setback and lot width are necessary. The newly created lots would no longer be a nonconforming use having two principal structures on one property. It is rare that a property has more than one principal structure on a lot. The granting of these variances will allow the property to be subdivided so that the nonconforming residential use is in compliance with the current zoning ordinance. 2. The granting of the proposed variance is necessary to permit the reasonable use of the property involved. The granting of the variances is necessary to permit reasonable use of the property. Granting of the variances will allow the property to alleviate an existing nonconformity of more than one principal structure on a single lot. 3. The granting of the variance will not unreasonably impact the character of the neighborhood or be detrimental to the health and safety of the public welfare The granting of the variances will not impact the character and development of the area. The structures on the lot are not proposed to be relocated or removed at this time with the subdivision of the property. In addition, the changes proposed to the lot, including newly dedicated access and utility easements, will enhance the public welfare by provided for legal rights for the owner of Lot 2, Block 1. 4. The granting of the proposed variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to "promote the most appropriate and orderly development of the residential, business, industrial, public land and public areas." In this case the replatting of the property into two separate lots will create more orderly development of the site as well as improve the health and safety of the uses with the addition of access and utility easements. In order for the development to occur, variances from the minimum lot width and sideyard setback are necessary. 5. The hardship is due to circumstances unique to the property not resulting from actions of the owners of the property. The hardship results from the necessary narrow lots that must be created to subdivide the nonconforming lot which contains two principal structures. 6. The granting of the variance will not result in allowing a use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. The variance would allow for the property to be platted into two distinct properties with one single family residential structure on each property. One single family residential structure on a property is an allowed use within the R-1 (Low Density Residential) District. Two single family residential structures, as currently in existence, on one property is not an allowed use. 7. The granting of the variance maybe necessary to alleviate a hardship of the inability to use solar energy systems. The granting of the variance will not be necessary to alleviate any hardships of the inability to use solar energy systems. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the applicant proposes to subdivide a property with two principal structures located on it into two separate residential properties. In order to subdivide the property and alleviate the nonconformity of more than one principal structure on a single lot, the platting of the lot will require variances from the minimum lot width and sideyard setback, driveway setback. The newly created lots will improve the overall situation of the existing site. Therefore, staff recommends approval of these variances with the following conditions: 1. This resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve the variances requested by the applicant with the listed conditions, or approve any variance the Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances. 2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose. 3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria. ACTION REQUIRED This request requires the following motions: 1. A motion and second adopting Resolution 11-02PC approving the following variances: Lot 1, Block 1, BERGGREN BEACH 1) A 18.5 foot variance from the required 90 foot minimum lot width for a riparian lot in the R-1 District. (Section 1104.302 (3)) 2) A 4.4 foot variance from the required 10 foot minimum side yard setback. (Section 1102.505 (1)) Lot 2, Block 1, BERGGREN BEACH 1) A 4.6 foot variance from the required 10 foot minimum side yard setback. (Section 1102.505 (1)) ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Resolution 11-02PC 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 RESOLUTION 11-02PC A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM THE REQUIRED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH, AND MINIMUM SIDEYARD SETBACK TO ALLOW FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY INTO TWO LOTS WITHIN THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. Beth Berggren is requesting a variance from the Zoning Ordinance for the subdivision of a residential property into two lots on property zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) at the following location, to wit; 4853 Beach Street NE, Prior Lake, MN 55372 Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 2, Chatonka Beach, Scott County, MN according to the recorded plat thereof, excepting the following described tract: Beginning at a point on the West line of said lot 8 distant 127.30 ft. South of the Northwest corner of said lot 8; thence South 6 degrees, 30 minutes, 0 seconds East, a distance of 155.06 feet more or less, to the shoreline of Prior Lake; thence Southwesterly along said shoreline to the intersection with the west line of said lot 8; thence North along said West line of lot 8 to the point of beginning.hat part of the West 10.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Costello's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Scott County, Minnesota lying Northerly of the South 192.00 feet thereof; AND That part of the East 88.50 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Costello's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Scott County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of the South 192.00 feet thereof; according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Scott County, Minnesota. 2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for the variance as contained in Case #11- 117 and held a hearing thereon on June 13, 2011. 3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Due to the narrowness of the existing lot variances from the sideyard setback and lot width are necessary. The newly created lots would no longer be a nonconforming use having two principal structures on one property. It is rare that a property has more than one principal structure on a lot. The granting of these variances will allow the property to be subdivided so that the nonconforming residential use is in compliance with the current zoning ordinance. Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpriorlakexom 5. The granting of the variances is necessary to permit reasonable use of the property. Granting of the variances will allow the property to alleviate an existing nonconformity of more than one principal structure on a single lot. 6. The granting of the variances will not impact the character and development of the area. The structures on the lot are not proposed to be relocated or removed at this time with the subdivision of the property. In addition, the changes proposed to the lot, including newly dedicated access and utility easements, will enhance the public welfare by provided for legal rights for the owner of Lot 2, Block 1. 7. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to "promote the most appropriate and orderly development of the residential, business, industrial, public land and public areas." In this case the replatting of the property into two separate lots will create more orderly development of the site as well as improve the health and safety of the uses with the addition of access and utility easements. In order for the development to occur, variances from the minimum lot width and sideyard setback are necessary. 8. The hardship results from the necessary narrow lots that must be created to subdivide the nonconforming lot which contains two principal structures. 9. The variance would allow for the property to be platted into two distinct properties with one single family residential structure on each property. One single family residential structure on a property is an allowed use within the R-1 (Low Density Residential) District. Two single family residential structures, as currently in existence, on one property is not an allowed use. 10. The granting of the variance will not be necessary to alleviate any hardships of the inability to use solar energy systems. 11. The contents of Planning Case #11-117 are hereby entered into and made a part of the public record and the record of decision for this case. CONCLUSION Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the following variances to allow for the subdivision of a residential property into two lots on property zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential), as shown on the Preliminary Plat dated May 19, 2011: Lot 1. Block 1. BERGGREN BEACH 1) A 18.5 foot variance from the required 90 foot minimum lot width for a riparian lot in the R-1 District. (Section 1104.302 (3)) 2) A 4.4 foot variance from the required 10 foot minimum side yard setback. (Section 1102.505 (1)) Lot 2, Block 1, BERGGREN BEACH 1) A 4.6 foot variance from the required 10 foot minimum side yard setback. (Section 1102.505 (1)) The variance is subject to the following conditions: This resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. Proof of recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on June 13, 2011 Bryan Fleming, Commission Chair ATTEST: Jeff Matzke, Planner BERGGREN BEACH LOCATION MAP w z J � cl O W co O of BEPCH ST NE SUBJECT PROPERTY N 0 125 250 500 Feet Se BE -R G GREN BEA Cfl- 11 / -( N8955'19 C 'R / / 6ENGIIAARN: r / TCWt 9he al)F IELEYF. 1 / � y 30 0 15 30 ISHIS IR FEV • DENOTES WIXi MONUMENT EWNO O DENOXS INCH MONUMENT SET AND MARKED 6Y LICENSE NO. 123N Ill DRAINAGE & UPUTY EASEMENIS ARE SHOWN THUS: ,'NO SCALE) �s I I I I I al I I BFING 10.0 ITE]IN A%DW AND A0,0 ING STREET RLGHT OF WAY LNES AND EEING 50 AEFT M ROW AND ADJOINING LOT LNF5 UNLESS OIH£RWISF INDICA IED ON WE PLAT. BENCHMARK ELEVA RON .956.67 IOP MUT OF HIDRAN]'AS SHOWN HEREON. VALLEY5VRVEYfNG CO., P.A. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That 1 -hod E. Berggren and Vero E. Berggren Revocable Trust, fee owners of the fallowing described properly situated In the County Of Scott, Stale of Minnesota to—wit: Lots 6. ], and 8, Bloaa 2, Chatonka Beach, Scott County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, excepting the fallowing described tract: Beginning at o point on the Weal ]in. of sold Lot B diatent 127.30 feet South of the Northwest darner of sold Lot 8; thence South 6 degrees, 30 minutae, 0 seconds East, a distance of 155.06 feet more or less, to the h.,all x of Prior lake; thence Southwesterly along .old shoreline to the Intersection with the Wesel line of said Let 8; thence North along said We,( line of lot 8 to the point Of beginning. Hove caused the some to berweyed and platted as BERGGREN BEACH, and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements for dmlrege and utility purposes only oe shown on the plat. In witness whereof said Lloyd E. Berggren and Vera E. Berggren Revocable Trust under agreement doted March 11, 1992 has caused these presents to be signed by Its proper officer this ,__ day of 2011. SIGNED: Lloyd E. Berggren and Vero E. Berggren Revocable Trust: as Trustee Beth Ellen Berggren STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SCOTT The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of —, 2011 by Beth Ellen Berggren trustee of the Lloyd E. Berggren and Vera E. Berggren Revocable Trust under agreement dated Marnh IIth,1992 on behalf of the Revocable Trust Notary Public, Scott County, Minnesota My Commission expires donuary 31, 2015 I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property daecribed n this plat ad BERGGREN BEACH; that this plat le a correct representation of the ourvel; that all dletanees are optimally shown an the plot In feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been carrepty placed in the ground as shown or will be correctly placed In the ground as dasignotod; that the outside boundary Knee are correctly deslgnoled an the plat; and that that,, era no wet lands ca banned In MS 500.01 Shia. 3. ar public highways to be deelgnated 0that than Shown, Scott hf. Swanson, Land Surveyor Mi ... cold Llaense Number 62309 C,TUOMSCTAYFD"The fore oln Surve by Scott M. Swanson Land tSurveyuq Minnesota Llcan ee Number 42309. day nl '011, Notafy Public, Scott County, Minnesota My Commission aspires January 31, 2015 This plat was approved by resolution by Ne City of Prior Lake, Minnesota of a regular meeting thereof held this _ day of 2011, end Ia In compliance wfih the p,.umlone of Minnesota Statute. Section 505.03, SubdlNelon 2. SIGNED: iia Mayor Atteeb Its Manager I hereby certify that I have examined this plot of BERGGREN REACH, and do hereby recommend this plat for approval as to form this tlay Of 2011. Scott County AttorEey I hereby certify that the Board of Commlamerand at Scott County, duly approved thio plot of BERGGREN BEACH, at a regular meeting thereof, thle __— day of _ 2011. Scott County Adm lninlralor SCOTT COUNTY AUDITOR / MEASURER; I hereby certify that the current and delir,eanl taxes od the lands demarbed within are paid and the transfer Is entered this day of 2011. signed by. misty. SCOTT COUNTY SURVEYOR Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 309.09, Bubo. 1, as amended, this plat has been re Wowed and approved this day of 2011. Scott Cdunly Surveyor SCOTT COUNTY REGISTRAR: I hereby certify that this plot of BERGGREN BEACH, was Pled In this oHlce this _ boy Of of _,,dock _M., and was filed as Document Nor I Scott Cnunly On O r t"l� � �y� oor se}9neN uxe� �=`' • Wit' o q jam: nE\ s \ gad p9aS sg$� k f Icy u, u. _zy A ` N � 0o h 47 ms c j m$ z zz n M I� ro roar sereasK f J �z 0 0 0 0 �ry 0 0 6 0 0 0 � ~ F r t"l� � �y� oor se}9neN uxe� �=`' • Wit' o q jam: nE\ s \ gad p9aS sg$� k f Icy q _zy A ` N � 0o h 47 r \ j rti I� ro roar sereasK f J ggp x u C � ~ F 5� A aNy sY.... 0 � m N \ z �r SN'lvM �aM >SiN I eor a 9LCCK e r t"l� � �y� oor se}9neN uxe� �=`' • Wit' o q jam: nE\ s \ gad p9aS sg$� k f Icy q _zy A N � 0o 47 r \ 5� A aNy sY.... 0 � m N \ z �r SN'lvM �aM >SiN I eor a 9LCCK e r t"l� � �y� oor se}9neN uxe� �=`' • Wit' s _zy A N � 0o e r \ rti 5� A aNy sY.... 0 � m N \ z �r SN'lvM �aM >SiN I eor a 9LCCK e r t"l� � �y� oor se}9neN uxe� �=`' • Wit' s _zy I� ro roar sereasK f J f� I 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM: 5D SUBJECT: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A COMBINED PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS BERGGREN BEACH PRESENTER: JEFF MATZKE, PLANNER PUBLIC HEARING: X_YES NO -N/A JUNE UNE 13, 2011 INTRODUCTION: Beth Berggren has applied for approval of a development to be known as Berggren Beach on the property located at 4853 Beach Street NE, along the northern shores of Lower Prior Lake, east of Rosewood Road NE and west of Bluebird Trail NE. The current property contains two single family home structures. The request calls for the subdivision of the existing single lot into two residential lots. PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Total Site Area: The total site consists of 0.90 acres. Topography: This topography of the site contains elevations ranging from 955' MSL at its highest point to 904' MSL (ordinary high water elevation of Prior Lake). Vegetation: The current property contains two single family home structures. There are also some significant trees on this site. No grading is proposed therefore, no trees will be impacted by the replating of the property. Wetlands: No wetlands are located on the site. Access: Access to the site is currently from Beach Street 2030 Comprehensive Plan Designation: This property is designated for Urban Low Density Residential uses on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Zoning: The site is located within the R-1 Zoning District (Low Density Residential). The R-1 district is consistent with the proposed R -LD designation. This district permits a maximum density of 4.0 units per acre. Shoreland: The site is located within the Shoreland District of Prior Lake and is subject to the City's Shoreland Ordinance. PROPOSED PLAN Lots: The preliminary plat consists of 2 lots for single family dwellings. Lot 1 is 15,361 square feet and Lot 2 is 25,015 square feet. Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpriorlakexom Streets: The proposed lots have frontage on existing Beach Street. No new streets are proposed. Sanitary Sewer/Water Utilities: Lateral sanitary sewer and water utilities are in place for the both existing residential structures. In addition an unused sewer and water service is located at the northeast corner of the property. Storm Sewer: No grading changes to the current runoff patterns are proposed for the replating of the lots. ANALYSIS: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 2 residential lots in order to alleviate the nonconformity of two principal structures on a single lot. By city ordinance no more than one principal building is allowed on one lot (Section 1101.501 (4)). The proposed layout of the lots will require variances from the minimum lot width, and side yard setback. Contingent upon the approval of these variance requests the proposed lots will conform to the R-1 Zoning Use District and Shoreland Districts requirements. The overall layout of the plat appears appropriate given the narrow lot constraints of the site. CONCLUSION: The combined preliminary and final plat application will comply with all relevant ordinance provisions and City standards, provided all the conditions of approval are met. Also, the nonconforming dual principal structures on the single lot will be alleviated by the replatting of the existing lot along with the dedication of access and utility easements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the combined preliminary and final plat. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the Combined Preliminary and Final Plat subject to conditions. 2. Table this item to a date specific, and provide the applicant with direction on the issues that have been discussed. 3. Recommend denial of the Combined Preliminary and Final Plat request. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends Alternative #1, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plat approval is subject to approval of variances from the minimum lot width, and sideyard setback. 2. The applicant shall record a private utility easement over the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1 for the benefit of Lot 2, Block 1. 3. The applicant shall record a private access easement over a portion of the driveway area of Lot 1, Block 1, within 90 days of plat approval unless a building permit is approved for removal of the principal structure on Lot 2, Block 1 and construction of a new principal structure. In this event a separate driveway shall be constructed for vehicular access to the new principal structure on Lot 2, Block 1. 4. In the event a new principal structure is constructed upon Lot 2, Block 1, the new structure's individual sewer and water service shall be through the unused existing lateral services at the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1. 5. The applicant must provide proof of installation of all subdivision monumentation within one (1) year from the date of recording the plat, or prior to issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first. 6. The applicant shall obtain required permits from all applicable governmental agencies prior to final plat approval. 7. The final plat shall be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of approval by the City Council. ACTION REQUIRED: A motion and second recommending approval of the following request: • Approval of a Combined Preliminary and Final Plat to subdivide 0.90 acres into 2 residential lots, subject to the above conditions. EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map 2. Preliminary and Final Plat Plans 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM: 5E SUBJECT: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A COMBINED PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS EASTWOOD THIRD ADDITION PRESENTER: JEFF MATZKE, PLANNER PUBLIC HEARING: X_YES NO -N/A JUNE UNE 13, 2011 INTRODUCTION: Cygnus Construction has applied for approval of a development to be known as Eastwood 3rd Addition on the property located at along the eastern shores of Lower Prior Lake, on the north side of Estate Avenue, north of 150th Street. The development proposes the subdivision of a single family residential property and a vacant property into three single family residential properties. PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Total Site Area: The total site consists of 1.44 acres. Topography: This topography of the site contains elevations ranging from 923' MSL at its highest point to 904' MSL (ordinary high water elevation of Prior Lake). Vegetation: The current properties contain a single family home structures. There are also a variety of significant trees on this site. Wetlands: No wetlands are located on the site. Access: Access to the site is currently from Estate Avenue. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Designation: This property is designated R -LD for Urban Low Density Residential uses on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Zoning: The site is located within the R-1 Zoning District (Low Density Residential). The R-1 district is consistent with the proposed R -LD designation. This district permits a maximum density of 4.0 units per acre. Shoreland: The site is located within the Shoreland District of Prior Lake and is subject to the City's Shoreland Ordinance. PROPOSED PLAN Lots: The preliminary plat consists of 3 lots for single family dwellings. Lot 1 is 17,000 square feet, Lot 2 is 16,200 square feet, and Lot 3 is 25,000 square feet. Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpriorlakexom Streets: The proposed lots have frontage on existing Estate Avenue. No new streets are proposed Sanitary Sewer/Water Utilities: Lateral sanitary sewer and water utilities are in place for all three existing residential properties. Storm Water: A rain garden is proposed to handle increased storm water for the site. The site is required to meet the City standards based on volume and rate control. Shoreland Ordinance: The proposed plat is located within the Shoreland District for Prior Lake and therefore the properties are required to meet the requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance including but not limited to impervious surface. The proposed lots will meet the impervious surface requirement. Floodplain District: The proposed plat is located within the Floodplain District for Prior Lake and therefore the properties are required to meet the requirements of the Floodplain Ordinance. The lowest floors of the new building pads are proposed to be above the required floodplain (910.0 elevation). Tree Preservation: The developer has identified 607 inches of total significant trees within the site. The Zoning Ordinance allows up to 35% removals as a result of grading for buildings pads and driveways. A total of 150 caliper inches have been identified for removals. While the proposed plan will meet the maximum requirement for tree removals before replacement, City staff believes the developer should consider relocating the proposed stormwater feature (rain garden) further to the north to allow for the preservation of some of the trees along the front property line of Lot 2. In addition, two front yard trees are required per lot under the Subdivision Ordinance. The developer shall revise the plans to satisfy this requirement. ANALYSIS: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 3 residential single family lots. The lots meet the City requirements for conforming riparian lots within the R-1 Zoning District. The overall layout of the plat appears appropriate given the constraints of the site's grades; however, as detailed in the Engineering Department Memorandum, modifications to the storm water design must be completed prior to final approval of the plat. The site will require the raising of the grades for Lot 1 and Lot 2 for floodplain purposes. CONCLUSION: The combined preliminary and final plat application will comply with all relevant ordinance provisions and City standards, provided all the conditions of approval are met. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the combined preliminary and final plat subject to the outlined conditions. ALTERNATIVES 1. Recommend approval of the Combined Preliminary and Final Plat subject to conditions. 2. Table this item to a date specific, and provide the applicant with direction on the issues that have been discussed. 3. Recommend denial of the Combined Preliminary and Final Plat request. 4. Other specific action as directed by the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends Alternative #1, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall address all engineering comments as outlined in the Engineering Department Memorandum dated June 7, 2011. 2. The applicant shall address all comments as outlined in the Community Development & Natural Resources Department Memorandum dated June 6, 2011. 3. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and pay all applicable development fees. 4. The applicant shall obtain required permits from all applicable governmental agencies prior to final plat approval. 5. The final plat shall be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of approval by the City Council. ACTION REQUIRED: A motion and second recommending approval of the following request: • Recommend approval of a Combined Preliminary and Final Plat to subdivide 1.44 acres into 3 residential lots, subject to the above listed conditions. EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map 2. Preliminary and Final Plat Plans 3. CDNR Dept. Memorandum dated 6-6-11 4. Engineering Department Memorandum dated 6-7-11 EASTWOOD THIRD ADDITION LOCATION MAP SUBJECT PROPERTIES REEN OAKS TRL N 0 250 500 1,000 Feet SE Preliminary Plat of: EASTWOOD THIRD ADDITION PRIOR LAKE LANE ELEVATION iA,,, ON JULY I2. T0,, - 90t'51 v" o 1 T°Ta .j T sue o1 AE/ fLOe i1(_ "bel vv �T _NV — •� ,/ "e ' e' I �LQT LOTlisr° iLARAP18,0 S0 P(Efl 1v1 TOTAL AREA -19� SQUAREf I ( , 16 Oac SOW -RE, ET 4 9p r 1 iZ 0003 SPU E FEET ABO 4 rr l \\ \V 1 l {II ) T wk if rov �l W'9m. x ON ^nee4B �i j("-'TfK 5"Y,... _. It 'TF 91p J9: ' Pane(: yrs, gaS9]' \ .'MA ISCIpOA ai \. — I / / \ \\ \ Buu-✓ug S 0 ." RUDI st". arell sFa. thus ares. Dothsarws' shpwn''ty Easements STREET NOTES ♦ eeonngs shown are based on REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 127. + Utilities shown are from information tarnished by the City of Prior Lake and are verified where possible. • Coaled Gopher State 1 far utility locations before any o ---ban shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. + bench Mork: Top of bydraol at the sovlhwesl c r of 14951 Estate Avenue Cambered Elnvolion - 922.15 feet. + Area = 62,000E ,,vane feet (.443 acres). r Zoning: R-1. w Building selback ontl zoning Information Nditnel from the City of Prior Lake Web Site. e All property within the proposed plat Is Torrms. • This property is bcoled in Flood Zone X (area outside .2 annual dmwoc flood plane) ontl in Flood Zone AE (base flood eleadion determined) per Community -Panel Number$ 270432 0002 C dated November 19, 1992 OWNER/DEVELOPER John ontl dill Aadersan 14932 Eslote Avenue SaufM1eost Pana Lose, Umholm, 55372 Phone 70-479-1894 Cygnus Coadmotron, LLC suite thou 7360 west 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124-1580 Phone 952-953-8B22 SURVEYOR/ENGINEER Suite 16 Aesac riles, Inc sane ed F 116 3440 Federal Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone 651-452-M5? a la }a ,a ca Scale In Feet Vicinity Map Section 30, Township 715, Range 21 No Scale LEGEND Iron Monument Found o Iron Monument Set PIT Nail Set r s nosy sewer -"to Storm sewer W Wale/main wt.A Hydraal W Gale Valve uxo Manhole coo catch Basin m0 Lill Stolon Is In -1 EI.-lEn + Guand Post c.!go PFOPowers Pole ,AW Light Pole 9 Electrical Transformer i T c,inwe Pedestal rF Nn CondMon, =C ncrele Smfoce O edvmrous Serfuce PROPERTY OFSCRIPTION Lots 27, 20 and 29, OSWOD, according to the recorded plot theneof, Scott Caunfy, Is_ __ '_ y_'--- .•....__Comrtle earl l` / th.11 am a duly Lcensed Lon) Suveym under the laws of the State of MllpcaaN,1— .....Dated Dated this 10th day at Mc , 2011 Ifi ' REHOER di ASSOCNTES ING i Ihamas J. Adiva, Lord Surveyor Minnesota License No. 43474 9EE$$9 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND t D SURVEYDRS a1 is JOB: 104-2454TIO pyape _ 7,— / C _ nNc l_ r tiou s / Mi asAc sFd•. j , \ �. DANLENF. MOLW£ \ .., sl•,.ae ALABCif'� 0Qt SQUARE FEET SOD( -$,'1_ FFEL ,IB4W904 / � _ sr F ccstiv - / N ss\\ \ \ J if rov �l W'9m. x ON ^nee4B �i j("-'TfK 5"Y,... _. It 'TF 91p J9: ' Pane(: yrs, gaS9]' \ .'MA ISCIpOA ai \. — I / / \ \\ \ Buu-✓ug S 0 ." RUDI st". arell sFa. thus ares. Dothsarws' shpwn''ty Easements STREET NOTES ♦ eeonngs shown are based on REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 127. + Utilities shown are from information tarnished by the City of Prior Lake and are verified where possible. • Coaled Gopher State 1 far utility locations before any o ---ban shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. + bench Mork: Top of bydraol at the sovlhwesl c r of 14951 Estate Avenue Cambered Elnvolion - 922.15 feet. + Area = 62,000E ,,vane feet (.443 acres). r Zoning: R-1. w Building selback ontl zoning Information Nditnel from the City of Prior Lake Web Site. e All property within the proposed plat Is Torrms. • This property is bcoled in Flood Zone X (area outside .2 annual dmwoc flood plane) ontl in Flood Zone AE (base flood eleadion determined) per Community -Panel Number$ 270432 0002 C dated November 19, 1992 OWNER/DEVELOPER John ontl dill Aadersan 14932 Eslote Avenue SaufM1eost Pana Lose, Umholm, 55372 Phone 70-479-1894 Cygnus Coadmotron, LLC suite thou 7360 west 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124-1580 Phone 952-953-8B22 SURVEYOR/ENGINEER Suite 16 Aesac riles, Inc sane ed F 116 3440 Federal Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone 651-452-M5? a la }a ,a ca Scale In Feet Vicinity Map Section 30, Township 715, Range 21 No Scale LEGEND Iron Monument Found o Iron Monument Set PIT Nail Set r s nosy sewer -"to Storm sewer W Wale/main wt.A Hydraal W Gale Valve uxo Manhole coo catch Basin m0 Lill Stolon Is In -1 EI.-lEn + Guand Post c.!go PFOPowers Pole ,AW Light Pole 9 Electrical Transformer i T c,inwe Pedestal rF Nn CondMon, =C ncrele Smfoce O edvmrous Serfuce PROPERTY OFSCRIPTION Lots 27, 20 and 29, OSWOD, according to the recorded plot theneof, Scott Caunfy, Minnesota and Tract A, REGISTERED LWD SURVEY NO. 727, Scoff County, Minnesetc. I hereby caddy that fW a.lm r., plot was prepared by me or ordery direction and th.11 am a duly Lcensed Lon) Suveym under the laws of the State of MllpcaaN,1— .....Dated Dated this 10th day at Mc , 2011 Ifi ' REHOER di ASSOCNTES ING i Ihamas J. Adiva, Lord Surveyor Minnesota License No. 43474 9EE$$9 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND t D SURVEYDRS .1,l" 1,1-1 mu. e e an nneae nth (651) 1. iic51 JOB: 104-2454TIO EASTWOOD THIRD ADDITION Vicinity Map Section 30, Township 115, Range 21 No 5cnle KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Cygnus Construction, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the Reading described property situated in the County of Scott, Slate of Mlnnesata, to wlh Lots twenty-seven (21), twenty-eight (28) and twenty-nine (29) of Eastwood, Scott County, Minnesota. and that John Anderson and Jill Andersen, husband and wife, fee owners of the following described property situated in the County of Scott, State of Minnesota, to MU Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 121, Scall Counly, Minnesota. Have caused the same to be sury yetl and planed as EASIIVOOD THIRD ADDITION and do hereby donele and dedicute to the publig (or public vso forever the the easements for drainage and utility purposes only as shown on this plat. In witness whereof sold Cygnus Construction, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company, hos caused these presents to be signed by its pfoper officer thisday a___, 2011. CYGNUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC Larry S. Severson. LLC State of County of This instrument was acknowledged before me on2011, by Larry S. Severson, Vice President of Cygnus Construction, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public. County,_,_ My Commise..a ,,,a In witness whereof said John Anderson and Jill Anderson, husband and wife, have hereunto set their hands Ihis_doy of 2011. John Anderson Jill Anderson Stat.of County of / The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of , 2011, by Jahn Anderson and JB Anderson, husband oad wile. a 9193 Qla 1� ` L„ N63 - / tietr Snas fia"peorl Is, aen "'pN poamenl No. 1Sed II 1 th at oil Reeases are correctly shown an the plot in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all moncuments will be reflaked i the ground as designated; / thvecuy at the outside boundary lines are codesignated on the plat antl that there are no net lands as Jenard Idly n ME 505.01, Saba, 3, or public highways � och '1 F— �z _ r 1 / himasel ITh • L ,. ,. � '. l is KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Cygnus Construction, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the Reading described property situated in the County of Scott, Slate of Mlnnesata, to wlh Lots twenty-seven (21), twenty-eight (28) and twenty-nine (29) of Eastwood, Scott County, Minnesota. and that John Anderson and Jill Andersen, husband and wife, fee owners of the following described property situated in the County of Scott, State of Minnesota, to MU Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 121, Scall Counly, Minnesota. Have caused the same to be sury yetl and planed as EASIIVOOD THIRD ADDITION and do hereby donele and dedicute to the publig (or public vso forever the the easements for drainage and utility purposes only as shown on this plat. In witness whereof sold Cygnus Construction, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company, hos caused these presents to be signed by its pfoper officer thisday a___, 2011. CYGNUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC Larry S. Severson. LLC State of County of This instrument was acknowledged before me on2011, by Larry S. Severson, Vice President of Cygnus Construction, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public. County,_,_ My Commise..a ,,,a In witness whereof said John Anderson and Jill Anderson, husband and wife, have hereunto set their hands Ihis_doy of 2011. John Anderson Jill Anderson Stat.of County of / The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of , 2011, by Jahn Anderson and JB Anderson, husband oad wile. / /ofary / -- ubkc,_ County, My Commission Expires _„ I hereby certify that I have surveyed and plolted the properly descnbed o this plat s EASTWOOD THIRD ADDITION; that this plat is u ....eel nowneenintion of the survey; , r �•/ th at oil Reeases are correctly shown an the plot in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all moncuments will be reflaked i the ground as designated; thvecuy at the outside boundary lines are codesignated on the plat antl that there are no net lands as Jenard Idly n ME 505.01, Saba, 3, or public highways •I/ to be designated other than as shown on the plot. r Thomas J. Adom, Land Surveyor / khan esato Userve No. 43414 State of Minnesolo Counly of Dakota The foregoing Instrument ryas acknowledged before me this day of 2011 by Thomas J. Adam, Land Surveyor. NNotary Public, Carver County, Mlnnesata My Commission Fxpiree Jonony 31, 2015 PRIOR -AKf, MINNESOTA CRY COUNCIL This plot of EASTWOOD THIRD ADDITION war approved and accepted by the City Council of Prior Lake, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 2011, and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 505.OJ, Subdivision 2, we are in conformance. 0 IS ]0 6o so Scale in Feet Mayer Manager The West line of the Lot 21, EASTW000 Is ran anad to have a began, Range 21 hos s bearing of S59°54'1Y'E. e Denotes Iran monument found SGOH' COUNTY AUDITOR AND TREASURER 1 Carries 1/2 inch by 14 inch ion I hereby certify Ural the current and delinquent foxes on the fonds described within are paid and the transfer is entered this_day of , 2011. meal set and marked by bfinnesota- License No. 43414 to be set within one year from the filing al the plot. signed by: _, deputy Bench Murk: Top nut of hydrant on the east side of Estate Avenue Southeast near the northwest corner of Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 72 Elevation = 922.15 SCOTT COUNTY SURVEYOR- 1 (f e feet .G O. ( NV 1929). t } - '^- pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 369.09, Subd. 1, as amended. this plat has been reviewed and approved this _ day of Drainage and Utility Easements are thus' �f r(' shown Scott county Surveyor t IV k 61 I I SCOTT COUNTY REGISTRAR OF TOLES t I hereby eeally tM1vf this plot was bled in this oRlce this _day of 2011, at o'clock .M. as Document No. rUj'i o 99 Being 5 feet In width and adn wil fol Imes, and being 10 feet width -- -- Scott County Registrar of Titles and otljoining right of way Imes unless atherwi'e shown. Rehder and Associates, Inc. PRIOR LAKE ELEVATION - YEAR HWL Y 1 909.010 = 901.51 MA 100mop \ D\ \ I 1. Will \ I I \ I 1 Spruce I i \ \ \ Sp uce Easement for utility pui per Document No. 1 R _ — 902 — / i i line 38'" Maple OPit Fire / e _908— / / 12� BircFFFFffff o+n _ Shore _ U25,000 SQUARE FEEL ABOVE 904 912 RAINGARDEN INFILT VOL = 873 CU.FT. 100—YR HWL = 908.8 Co / —914— / 24" / Oak � '918, � 18� Spruce r / �8„ j Spruce sin LEGEND ' • • ` ' `` a5a PROPOSED CONTOUR GRADING NOTES 0235 PROPOSED ELEVATION / (�O 11 — All elevations shown are to final surfaces. 11 SILT FENCE l ✓ 0PR RP — 6 9E,GOF S��E� BOUNDARY/ROW/BLOCK LINE N� 9221 EASEMENT Hyd. . ------------- LOT LINE BUILDING/PARKING SETBACK LINE ------- 0� DRAINAGE ARROW W EXISTING WATERMAIN S EXISTING SANITARY SEWER sr EXISTING STORM SEWER 9so EXISTING CONTOUR 995.50 EXISTING ELEVATION 0 10 20 40 60 Scale in Feet , cW"t; p,0 3 N p c.Z �a nZ =,moIg o a _TE Vr V CTO a 7-0 3 2000 -r-wE0 _E6:5 Z6 Z O D_' Z 0 g � U � SUPPORT POST ® 4' O.C. y CV W Y o og aate\\ LO vO V N FILTER FABRIC 1 Gw < n COMPACTED BACKFILL y z OVER FILTER FABRIC V 'Z], d W � Q � FLOW "O U N' Gl N_ XO LO 04 A 0 Z r1�•1 W � w SILT FENCE a C1 NO SCALE 0 10 20 40 60 Scale in Feet , cW"t; p,0 3 N p c.Z �a nZ =,moIg o a _TE Vr V CTO a 7-0 3 2000 -r-wE0 _E6:5 Z6 Z O D_' Z g z o_ W Y og w o 0 < n Q 0 LL_ Q O � U Z W U SHEET NUMBER C1 Date: June 6, 2011 To: Steven Ling, Severson, Sheldon. Dougherty & Molenda, P.A. From: Jeff Matzke, Planner, CDNR Department Subject: Eastwood 3 I Addition Combined Preliminary & Final Plat City Project 411-116 Memo The Community Development & Natural Resources Department has reviewed the Combined Preliminary & Final Plat for the subject project with a plan date of May 17, 2011 and we have the following comments: Preliminary Plat 1. Provide proposed impervious surface calculations for Lot 3. 2. While the proposed plan will meet the maximum requirement for tree removals before replacement, City staff believes the developer should consider relocating the proposed storm water feature (rain garden) further to the north to allow for the preservation of some of the trees along the front property line of Lot 2 Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 /wwwxityofpriorlakexom Date: June 7, 2011 To: Community Development and Natural Resources Department From: Engineering Department — Larry Poppler, City Engineer Subject: Eastwood 3 I Addition — City Project 411-116 Memo The Engineering Department reviewed the Final Plat plans for the subject project with a plan date of June 6, 2011 and have the following comments. General 1. Show side yard and front yard easements on grading plan. 2. Show easement over triangle area near lift station. 3. Show City Project #11-116 on the plans. Grading Plan 1. Show slopes for maintained areas at no more than 4:1 2. Grading is shown over the existing storm sewer pipe. Cover of at least 18" should be maintained over the existing pipe. 3. Show top and bottom wall elevations. Hvdroloev and Storm Sewer 1. Describe standard for rate and volume control based on rules and describe in narrative and summary tables how the design meets the requirements. Our rate standard is not pre/post. Volume control standard is for all increase in impervious, not just that draining to the treatment system. 2. VOLUME CONTROL: PWDM.IIL4 spells out volume control criteria. The stormwater management report should include a summary of the volume control requirement and the CN reduction credits used, such as impervious disconnections, tree planting, soil amendments, buffer preservation areas. 3. Infiltration, bioretention, constructed wetlands, and other methods for volume control must follow requirements in PWDM.IIL4 and referenced requirements from the Minnesota State Stormwater Manual some referenced standards are summarized below. The biofiltration/infiltration system proposed does not seem to provide for 48hr drain down period. Soils information will need to be provided to ensure filtration rate assumptions are valid. a. 12.13I0.3 Example in MN Stormwater manual includes C/D soil infiltration, and biological uptake based volume control. Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / w .cityofpriorlakexom b. It is required that treatment practices be built after area to be treated is constructed and fully established. Phasing should be provided to keep heavy equipment off of the area to avoid undue soil compaction. c. Vegetation should be selected that will thrive in the designed system. A landscape and tree planting plan should be provided. d. A drainage easement will be needed encompassing the entire infiltration basin. 4. Calculate water quality requirements (90% TSS, 60% P reduction) and show how proposed plan meets the requirement. The treatment system is on private property and it is assumed that it will remain under private ownership. The continued function of the treatment system is a public benefit; therefore a maintenance plan and agreement will be required, binding property owners to maintain the system at its designed average level of service. The maintenance agreement must be drafted and signed at the time of site plan approval. The proposed system sits on a single property, but treats two properties. Will maintenance burden be shared? Utilitv Plan 1. Utility services are provided for each lot within the plat.