HomeMy WebLinkAbout4B Comprehensive Plan ReportPRip�
FV
U f" 4646 Dakota Street SE
'MEWPrior Lake, NW 55372
MESO'Vt
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: JUNE 16, 2014
AGENDA #: 4B
PREPARED BY: DAN ROGNESS, COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
PRESENTED BY: DAN ROGNESS
PUBLIC HEARING: YES
AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAP-
TER 3, LAND USE ELEMENT, OF THE PRIOR LAKE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN RELATED TO THE STAGING OF DEVELOPMENT, THE METROPOLI-
TAN URBAN SERVICE AREA (MUSA), AND THE ORDERLY ANNEXATION
AREA (OAA)
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this item is to consider amending the 2013 Comprehensive Plan
to include four new single family residential lots of Godsons Way subdivision
within MUSA as identified in Figure 3.3 of the Plan, and to consider removing
those phased Annexation Areas identified in Figure 3.4 that have been previously
annexed into the City of Prior Lake.
History
On July 8, 2013, the City Council approved the annexation of approximately 10.5
acres by ordinance on the northern edge of The Enclave at Clearly Lake. This
property was anticipated with the platting of The Enclave to include an additional
four single family lots at the end of a cul-de-sac. Subsequent to the annexation,
Planning Commission and City Council approved the preliminary plat for God-
sons Way to include four lots. On April 28, 2014, the City Council approved the
final plat of Godsons Way.
Current Circumstances
The Metropolitan Council informed the city that it would not issue a sanitary sewer
extension permit to serve the four lots in Godsons Way until it amended its Com-
prehensive Plan in order to include that property into the city's Metropolitan Urban
Service Area (MUSA), as provided for in Figure 3.3 of the Plan. In addition, the
Metropolitan Council asked that the Orderly Annexation Area map be updated to
remove those phases that have already been annexed into the city, as provided
for in Figure 3.4 of the Plan. Therefore, both of these actions are now being
proposed to be recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the
City Council.
Conclusion
City staff supports approval of the MUSA map amendment based on the following
factors:
1. The 2005 preliminary plat for The Enclave at Cleary Lake showed an an-
ticipated development at the end of Natures Way; in, fact, the city ap-
proved a temporary cul-de-sac within an easement outside of the plat,
but within the proposed 4 -lot development, rather than have it end within
The Enclave plat.
2. The 2013 annexation of the Hunter property was approved by the City
Council, due largely to the previously approved preliminary plat for The
Enclave at Cleary Lake; these four lots were anticipated with the ap-
proved Cleary Lake subdivision.
3. The 2014 approved final plat for Godsons Way follows the preliminary
plat for these four single family lots, and the temporary cul-de-sac will
now be reconstructed to meet city standards as a permanent cul-de-sac.
4. The 4 -lot subdivision of Godsons Way fully complies with the city's Sub-
division Ordinance and Public Works Design Manual. In addition, the
twelve criteria listed in Section 3.6 of the Prior Lake 2030 Comprehen-
sive Plan, "Staging of Development", page 45 (attached), are being met
based on City staff's analysis of Godsons Way.
5. A draft completion of Section 5, "Water Resources", of the Met Council's
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form is attached, which
shows no negative conclusions or responses to adding sanitary service
to four lots.
City staff supports approval of the Orderly Annexation Area map; this is more of
a house-cleaning amendment to remove those annexation areas already an-
nexed into the city.
ISSUES: These two amendments to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan align the plan with
recent actions by the City, including a plat approval and various annexations.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Motion and a second to recommend amendments to Chapter 3, Land Use
Element, of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to add the Godsons Way plat
area within MUSA (Figure 3.3) and to remove phasing areas 3.1, 4.1, 4.3,
4.4, 6.1, 6.2 and 8.3 from the OAA (Figure 3.4).
2. Motion and a second to table action and ask City staff to provide additional
information as requested by the Commission
3. Motion and a second to recommend denial of the amendments.
RECOMMENDED Alternative #1
MOTION:
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Preliminary and Final Plats of Godsons Way.
2. Section 3.6 of the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendment application to the Met Council.
4. Figure 3.3, Undesignated MUSA Reserve Map.
5. Figure 3.4, Prior Lake / Spring Lake Annexation.
����.� t�� ��' `•_��'``ti � s ` y ` ` ������ i^may � �' 3 � li
s ` \` \moi' � �-r�..:�\'�M1ti \'�• ��� `�_ � \ � ��-..� `
1 y' I+ � 1.:.1� � mfr ! � �� :� „'_�—~_-•—~. ��'--
10 �ef� j-�
Iel.�.+�' � �v .r-�l. •. c','> I � � I � ?:E�'n�.d }fie, - �
`� 1.1 vi ice-'• t ''N [ }—�:ry �T}ry� \ c cs ti .� _ i�
'c �.'. @ � _ �. �� `• I CstS� ,� ./�� - {1=-:. use - � "���f �(��1, i ^' \ L � � ✓ f ,f� -•
You
^I •. `'� � C � 7 ;� ° �'t0--r �r!`1'r-=�= � -� h 4 r �� � ,;�� � Sur i .h .. �
�"`'yK. wh, ' ! e' S'sfra-•-.N —'f'a ; -F! 10!14 t'1 _•� �i. �r .�� c ,` of e .�f, a ._-9 `I -t1' t'y; es -''Ln
Al
IAj t i 4 u w
tZI
� t � I•F� ;'flll 3 `r� �� �I� It A / �> I I V 4<t I > I J P } ' � L,c
nn -
if
'' I
_�; ` � � J Cy may` ,C�` � l _. —L� `r �-.1,'•� � 1 G � t _.� I. j' I 1
CrTy
Lam'j
zs
77
tt n . l---4 �I 1\ ti 'y } `
83
�
[j p� � 'tEKo usJ � � � � c] c is �•1 TA o .e,';,��C1 r�! �y �!
..1
{�� [6} <- �� `^_�- : G v� 1, T p I '`'g '� • Gil 7, j r
i\��pla � ® ci} 4' � �-u vt s 5=. l - i . yt. 1:� ..� �S- •`J � 1
5 +
\l 11 (j� ® � �� �7 6 O _ _ - _ ��., � I i ,. 1 �v�• `\'�::::a; I m is
7
J
\J�
Ali
�• .-- 2 0 .L3s'F.S, aSf3S .. .... .
Kea: ov ri/rVe '1vo aar 5r=i�-w (+
c
..� O --No
• i a ° an' � .�•or _
ii
re,l�seen sore
ag U0� L�r10 tiU 0
+-i zip { w w,u:F y F` S, a r ag na a area ; T P au,;ice a ae wnsnaa neo 5 T \
J
0
z
0
U
z
0z
�Q
0�
D� rY
W W
LLJ I--
<
Q
LU Lu
z
gLu
Zz :
® p cn
{A 0 <
® a. <
Oz
Q
rr
n
v! v!
z�
W
a �
z
0 U)
rI—
v I
z
0
U
0
> >n. o D aEq•Jm
ten"' �
<se SarGz'F `?papa s8�
N
r.
W F
�zirH 7o�=xBagRoa�O
_ a
4
!y
z
�s
�` �
❑
y n y_
II
� uQl
I
_ z%=
V n
aJSN y'N�1.
O a a
x�Jn
W V rc
11
N
<se SarGz'F `?papa s8�
N
r.
W F
�zirH 7o�=xBagRoa�O
�s
z
I
I
II
� uQl
I
VA
t=
r —
I
I
I
_
<se SarGz'F `?papa s8�
N
r.
W F
�zirH 7o�=xBagRoa�O
M59L Gv 'S_a +Vi VS �aG .+TiY'advl+`?H
m L a v v ca w:ia
UnId &aP
MIR,,
]�C
rig- i tu� - \
Yi W
En �[51 -.nd a,a 1=A t:lni Fcav I zu! aRYa ed .1�3eta n 31� t32.`5 AFI WSJ3a X16 y M
bil
- ~~~ ON,! yF o
ti
4
S
i n o E
tON� E,
QG g§ u$
°�obn
Ij I£e5Y
g—co°
��oto
z ge�ao
ao�a�s
o$se�g
z
_ = a k p 8
I i n
b� �� 4 I
� j� �
i��
I I J I J
mif
env
°§
E
m
N n
� a
� S aL5
sQa°s3
�nE
Roy �-S
m SSa`
�Ee
F'EEc
�2aooa'�
dS
°�_ 6agQ
� Lia
�g� aha
65Q oPVo
Qa;a
60
W
no
�—
�
°?
eos'O
a�aQ
o
Ea
�o�
�
tae
OE _ cog
✓. QSo
a a vE
4
S
i n o E
tON� E,
QG g§ u$
°�obn
Ij I£e5Y
g—co°
��oto
z ge�ao
ao�a�s
o$se�g
z
Z NQ
w Mg
\ G
`\ � �. \
[
�
I i n
b� �� 4 I
� j� �
i��
I I J I J
mif
env
°§
E
m
N n
� a
� S aL5
sQa°s3
°mffi
G'as
m SSa`
�a�y
F'EEc
�2aooa'�
V
Z NQ
w Mg
\ G
`\ � �. \
[
�
I i n
b� �� 4 I
� j� �
i��
I I J I J
•
m
JzW�o
3x8 ox as
In order to insure that development which is proposed does not strain City resources, the
City will apply the following criteria in judging whether a proposed development is eligible to
have sanitary sewer services extended.
® Property shall be contiguous to property already within the MUSA.
® MUSA designation shall only be given to developments having a recorded final
plat and a signed developer's agreement with surety covering necessary
infrastructure improvements to be installed as part of the development.
0 Where applicable, utility improvements will address health, safety and
environmental issues and concerns.
® The development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
® The development will provide adequate water supplies.
® The development will provide adequate roads and streets to serve the
development.
o The development will provide for adequate sanitary sewer facilities.
® The development will proceed consistent with applicable environmental policies
and regulations.
The developer and benefiting property owners shall assume the primary
responsibility for financing improvement costs. The City will participate in such
financing only under extraordinary circumstances.
Preliminary plan approval shall not constitute a guarantee that a MUSA
allocation will be made to the subject property.
The development shall proceed under the understanding that the project will be
maintained in accordance with the limitations imposed by the City and the
Metropolitan Council regarding MUSA availability and potential sewage flows
from the project. The City and Metropolitan Council shall be indemnified by the
developer against any claims arising as a result of future limitations on MUSA
availability.
The City agrees to annually report on all allocations of undesignated MUSA
reserve to the Metropolitan Council,
Figure 3.3 shows those areas in the City which have potential to be included in the MUSA
during the course of the next 25 years. The shaded areas shown have an area of
approximately 3,933 acres.
ONW6111-041:11 "111 111111101i
In 1972, the City of Prior Lake and Spring Lake Township entered into an orderly
annexation agreement covering Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12 and the east half of
Sections 5 and 8. By 2000, the terms and conditions of the 1972 agreement had become
outdated or invalid, so in 2003 a new agreement was negotiated between the City and
Spring Lake Township. This agreement provides for the staged annexation of more than
3,000 acres by the year 2024. The large majority of this acreage will be annexed by 2014.
Sections 1, 2, 3 and part of 10 and 11 have since been incorporated into the City.
04 caro)
7he Coy of Prior Dake 2D30 Comprehensive Land Use flan 45 �r�NxesQK'
Metropolitan Council
� Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
20. Does the amendment affect any airport functions?
❑ Not applicable. Site is not within airport compatibility area or search area.
❑ No. The site is within airport compatibility area or search area, but no impacts, Explain below:
❑ Yes. The CPA site is within an airport compatibility area or search area, and experiences off -airport
impacts related to the following:
❑ Aircraft Noise. Describe whether the community has adopted land use compatibility guidelines,
including preventive and corrective noise abatement and/or mitigation measures being applied.
❑ Airport Safety Zoning. Indicate whether the community participates on a joint
airport/community zoning board, has an approved airport zoning ordinance, and how those
requirements relate to the proposal.
❑ Airport Infrastructure. Describe how the proposal affects or is affected by the provision of
services or facilities to the airport (e.g. roads, utilities, police/fire, etc.).
SECTION 5: WATER RESOURCES http://www.metrocouncil.orQ/plan.ning/LPH/LPHSect5.pdf
21. What type of wastewater treatment will be used to serve the proposed amendment?
❑ Individual Sewage Treatment System (ISTS)
❑ Privately Owned / Community Treatment System
❑ Local / Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment Plant DF.A65
® Regional Wastewater Treatment
22. Wastewater Flow: Complete the following table to show whether the amendment increases or
decreases wastewater flow compared to the currently planned land use and sewer flow projections.
Year
2010
2020
2030
mgd = million
gallons per day
Total Community Flow
Pre -Amendment (mgd
4.2
4.8
5.6
Total Community Flow
Past -Amendment (mgd
4.2
4.8
5.6
May 2.0 1!
6
I -A Metropolitan Council
A
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
23. Does the local wastewater system have adequate capacity or staged capacity to
accommodate the proposed amendment?
® Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below:
The system design flows reflect a population of 56,000 people over the 2030 Land Use Plan area. The projected flows
represent the anticipated sewer flows for Prior Lake at full development of the 2030 Land Use Plan, plus additional sewer
district areas, and reflect a population of approximately 46,000 people. The system is designed for a larger population to
maintain flexibility in applying density requirements to fixture developments, including the Orderly Annexation Area (OAA)
with Spring Lake Township. The Godsons Way property is located within South 21 Sewer District, Sub -District S21-25, of
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Figure 8. 1, Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan.
24. Does the regional wastewater system have adequate capacity or staged capacity to
accommodate the proposed amendment?
® Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below:
The system is designed for a larger population to maintain flexibility in future developments, The reserve capacity in the
system allows for instances of higher density use and orderly annexations within the approved OAA. The phasing areas of
development within the OAA is 5-7 years behind the scheduled years. The Godsons Way property is located within South 21
Sewer District, Sub -District S21-25, of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Figure 8. 1, Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan.
25. Has the community and/or Metropolitan Council identified an 'inflow and infiltration (I/I)
problem?
❑ Yes. ® No, If Yes, describe steps taken to address the I/I issue and plans for action below:
26. Identify regional interceptor(s) that will be impacted by these changes and indicate if
flows will be diverted from one interceptor service area to another below.
Prior Lake Interceptor (MCES-7120) - The Prior Lake Interceptor will ultimately serve all of Prior Lake municipal limits and
the Orderly Annexation Area as outlined in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
27. Does the amendment include any wastewater flow to an adjacent community? For new
inter -community agreements, the receiving community must also amend the sewer element of its plan.
❑ Yes. Enclose a copy of the inter -community agreement with the amendment submittal.
® No.
28. Will stormwater runoff generated from the amendment be treated on-site?
❑ No. Check one of the following and describe:.
❑ Runoff will not receive treatment. Describe below:
❑ Runoff will be treated off-site. Identify off-site treatment facility below:
❑ Yes. Describe type and level of on-site pollutant removal treatment/mitigation plans below:
May 20J. I
City of Prior Lake
rxia,, Minnesota N
2006 E
UNDESIGNATED
MUSA RESERVE MAP
SMSC TRUST LAND
SMSC FEE -OWNED LAND
LAKE
WITHIN MUSA
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
OUTSIDE MUSA
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPED LAND
PUBLIC PARK
PRIVATE GOLF COURSE
ADOPTED OCTOBER 2006
Last Updated October 2006
City of Prior Lake Engineering Department
X:\Planning\Projects\MUSA\musa.apr
2800 0 2800 Fee
Campbell
Lake (NE)
Howard Lake (NE)
957.3'
ke (NE)
980'
11
Spring Lake (GD)
912.8'
;Lake
907.3'
906.7'
Upper Prior Lake (GD)
904'
Crystal Lake (NE)
Rice Lake (NE) r
945.0'
y\
Pike
Lake 0
Al
J7
Loner Prior Lake (GD)
904'
This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey
and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a
compilation of records, information and data from various
city, county and state offices and other sources. This document
should be used for reference only. No representation is made
that features presented accurately reflect true location. The
City of Prior Lake, or any other entity from which data was
obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein.
If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Prior Lake.
n
Lake (R6)
Cleary Lake (NE)
937.8'
FIGURE 3.3
U ho, 4 10 1 ho, 40 wi
Elm
I� 111
... ii'
,
LIP 0
&AF
sea
�■1Jlfflffm�
mm rA
0 1 a
I
"I'A
Ak
"Ta 0 10
!DJ !MEWA