HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-09PC 3709 Pershing Street VariancesRESOLUTION 9509PC
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES FROM THE MiNIMUM SIDE YARD
SETBACK AND MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 4.2 OF THE ZONiNG ORDINANCE TO PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTiNG RESIDENCE iN THE R~I
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND SD-SHORELAND DISTRICT AT 3709
PERSHiNG STREET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
Kim and Ann Kraus have applied for variances from Section 4.2 of the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit construction of an addition to an existing residence
on property located in the RI-Suburban Residential and SD-Shoreland districts at
the following location, to wit;
Lot 46, Inguadona Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the Application for Variance as contained
in Case #VA9515.
The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan.
Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it
is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variances
will not result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, and danger to the public safety, unreasonably
diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be
contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
16200 tl~.Of.~QtN, c~5S0~,P,Q>rior Lake, Minnesota 55372 1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 4~.7-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such
property, and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such
land is located.
The granting of the variances is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variances will not serve merely as
a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship.
The contents of Planning Case VA95-15 are hereby entered into and made apart
of the public record and the record of decision for this case. Pursuant to Section
5-6-8 of the Ordinance Code these variances will be deemed to be abandoned,
and thus will be null and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the
holder of the variance has failed to obtain any necessary, required or
appropriate permits for the completion of contemplated improvement.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants and
approves the following variances:
1. A variance to permit a driveway setback of 2 feet instead of the required 5 feet.
A variance to permit impervious surface coverage of 32% instead of the
maximum permitted coverage of 30% of the total site area.
3. A variance to allow a structure setback of 9 feet instead of the required 10 feet.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on May 22, 1995.
Thomas Vonhof, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye
Planning Director
RESOLUTION 95-09PC 2