HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-97 Liesener Variance
{)Z-C,I
{
ue-)~ LJa.v~
Resolution
and ~inutes
f~ C\\tu~I~ (I '-It 07
~ I 02- (if p~
({V. ()L- l')'fC-
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
Planning Commission Meeting
October 14, 2002
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY RINGSTAD, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 02-
011PC APPROVING VARIANCES TO PERMIT A 14.9 FOOT FRONT YARD
SETBACK FOR A 5 FOOT STOOP AND 5 FOOT EAVE AND DENY A VARIANCE
FOR A 27 FOOT WIDE DRIVEWAY.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
5. Public Hearings:
Commissioner Stamson read the Public Hearing Statement and opened the meeting.
A. Case 02-097 Mark Liesner is applying for a 52,492 square foot variance from
the required minimum 2 acre lot area in the RS (Rural Subdivision Residential)
zoning district and a 76 foot variance from the required 100 foot minimum setback
from a tributary river for the construction of a single family dwelling on Lot 13,
Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition
Planner Cynthia Kirchoff presented the Planning Report dated October 14, 2002, on file
in the office of the City Planning Department.
Mark Liesner is requesting variances from zoning ordinance provisions to permit the
construction of a single family dwelling on property zoned R-S (Rural Subdivision
Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay District) and located at 4525 Jackson Trail (Lot
13, Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition). The property is guided Urban Low/Medium Density
Residential in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan.
The site is a vacant, riparian lot, as it abuts an unnamed tributary watercourse connected
with Pike Lake. Trees are scattered throughout the property. Municipal water and sewer
is currently unavailable to the site. The applicant requests the following variances:
1. A 52,492 square foot variance from the required minimum 2 acre lot area in
the R-S zoning district to allow a 34,628 square foot lot.
2. A 76 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an unnamed
tributary watercourse.
The applicant is requesting variances to construct a single family dwelling on property
zoned R-S and SD. The subject lot does not comply with the minimum lot area
established by the zoning ordinance, because it was platted in 1974, prior to the current
ordinance being adopted in 1999. Moreover, the proposed dwelling does not comply
with the minimum setback from the tributary watercourse that extends along the east
portion of the site.
Since the property is a legal, nonconforming lot of record and the required watercourse
setback significantly constrains the site's buildable area, variances are warranted. The
property owner cannot construct a reasonable use without relief from the zoning
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MNl01402.doc 2
Planning Commission Meeting
October 14, 2002
ordinance. However, the 76 foot setback variance seems excessive considering a
dwelling can be constructed on the property while maintaining a greater setback.
Staff supports the lot area variance, but not the 76 foot tributary watercourse variance. A
reduced 40 foot setback variance is appropriate, because it provides more protection to
the tributary. This is also consistent with the variance approved by the Planning
Commission in 1999.
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) was noticed about the variance requests
and recommended the house pad be reoriented to increase the setback from the
watercourse. If this relocation is not feasible, the DNR expects that at least the 30 foot
setback, approved in 1999, would be met.
Staff recommended approval ofthe requested 52,492 square foot variance from minimum
lot area and a 40-foot tributary watercourse setback, subject to the following conditions:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption.
Proofofrecording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state
agency regulations
3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits for an Individual Sewage
Treatment System (ISTS) from Scott County.
4. The ISTS shall comply with applicable regulations.
5. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted with the building permit application.
Questions from the Commissioners:
Criego questioned why the 1999 variance was approved at 70 feet but now staff suggests
a 60 foot variance. Is that directly related to the DNR request? Kirchoff stated the staff
was recommending a 40 foot variance based upon the DNR recommendation.
Ringstad questioned if the DNR was involved in the first request in 1999. Kirchoffsaid
they did respond to the lot area at that time. There was no mention of the setback
vanance.
Comments from the public:
Applicant Mark Liesner, 8679 Sunset Court, Shakopee, stated he was confused on the
staffs recommended changes on setbacks from 1999. He felt the setback was doubled.
Liesner said the location of the house proposed by the DNR does not result in a different
elevation. It is also a different orientation causing the neighbor to look at the entire rear
of the house. Liesner felt the DNR was not so firm on their 60 foot setback. He felt the
60 foot setback makes it impossible to build a home. If the variance was not possible he
would want at least the 30 foot setback as proposed in 1999. He felt the DNR took the
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MNIOI402.doc 3
Planning Commission Meeting
October 14, 2002
liberty of changing the design of the house and then suggested it would allow a 60 foot
setback. Liesner went on to give a brief history of the lot.
The public hearing was closed.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Criego:
. Remembered this clearly in 1999. The variance provided in 1999 should be the
same as today. Does not see any reason to change it.
. Approve the lot area and setback from the unnamed stream to allow a 70 foot
vanance.
Lemke:
. Agreed.
Atwood:
. Agreed.
Ringstad:
. Agreed. If it was good in 1999 and extended in 2000, it should be approved as
well as the additional variance request.
Stamson:
. Concurred. Believed it was excessive in 1999, but if they proved the request at
that time, then willing to stick with it this time.
. It worked in the past.
. Approve a 30 foot setback.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY LEMKE, APPROVING RESOLUTION 02-
014PC APPROVING A 54,492 SQUARE FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM
2 ACRE LOT AREA FOR PROPERTIES ZONED RS (RURAL SUBDIVISION
RESIDENTIAL) AND A 70 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 100 FOOT
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUT ARY WATERCOURSE A
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLING
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY LEMKE, APPROVING RESOLUTION 02-
015PC DENYING A 76 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE 100 FOOT MINIMUM
SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY WATERCOURSE FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLING.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner Stamson explained the appeal process.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MNIOI402.doc 4
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The undersigned, duly qualified and City Clerk of the City of Prior Lake, hereby certifies
the attached hereto is the original true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION 02-14PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 54,492 SQUARE FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
MINIMUM 2 ACRE LOT AREA FOR PROPERTIES ZONED RS (RURAL
SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL) AND A 70 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIRED 100 FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
WATERCOURSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AS GLE FAMILY DWELLING
#02-097 Mark Liesener
Dated this 24th day of October, 2002
(City Seal)
I: \02riles\02variances\truecopy.doc
October 24, 2002
Mark Liesener
8679 Sunset Court
Shakopee, :MN 55379-8077
RE: Case File No.: 02-097, Variances for the construction of a single family dwelling
Dear Mr. Liesener:
This letter is to officially inform you that on October 14, 2002, the Planning Cormnission approved a
52,492 square foot variance from the required minimum 2 acre lot area in the R-S zoning district and
a 70 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an unnamed tributary watercourse for the
construction of a single family dwelling, subject to the following conditions:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. Proof of
recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be submitted to the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of a building pennit.
2. The building pennit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state agency regulations.
3. The applicant shall obtain all necessazy pennits for an Individual Sewage Treatment System
(lSTS) from Scott County.
4. The ISTS shall comply with applicable regulations.
5. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted with the building pennit application.
Enclosed is a certified copy of the original Resolution approving the aforementioned variances to be
recorded at Scott County and a copy for your records. I have also enclosed a copy of the resolution
denying the variance for the 74 foot variance for your records. Additionally, the enclosed Assent
Form must be signed by all property owners and returned to the Planning Department prior to the
issuance of any necessary permits.
Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (952) 447-9813.
Sincerely,
.' -", ~ !
C'1Pl~k:
Cynthia R. Kirchdf,
Planner
Enclosures
.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
L DISTRIBUTE TO:
r+ Frank Boyles . Bud Osmundson
1 Sue Walsh . Sue McDermott
I Ralph Teschner
Chris Esser
Bob Hutchins
Don Rye
,. Jane Kansier
I
I.
I
I
I
I
PROJECT NAME:
I APPLICANT:
CONTACT PERSON:
PID#:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
I
I PROJECT REQUEST:
.
.
DNR - Pat Lynch
County Hwy. Dept.
MNDOT
SMDC
Mediacom Cable
,~t qJ;;PS JOD-
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
ORC PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST
LlESENER VARIANCE (Case File #02-097)
An application for a 52,492 square foot variance from the
required minimum 2 acre lot area in the RS (Rural Subdivision
Residential) zoning district and a 76 foot variance from the
required 100 foot minimum setback from a tributary river for the
construction of a single family dwelling on Lot 13, Block 2,
Titus 2nd Addition
Mark Liesener
Mark Liesener
(952) 233-5351
SITE INFORMATION
25-087 -025-0
4525 Jackson Trial
R-S/SD
R-L/MD
Review and comment on variance application.
lnl
II
APPLICATION FOR:
Administrative Land Division
Comprehensive Plan Amend.
Conditional Use Permit
Home Occupation
Rezoning
Site Plan
Preliminary Plat
PUD
Final Plat
. Variance
Vacation
Fire Chief
Bill O'Rourke
Minnegasco
Watershed Dist.
Telephone Co.
Electric Co.
Met. Council
Date Received 8/12/02 Date Distributed 9/25/02 Date Due 10/03/02
Complete Application 9/16/02 Date Distributed to 9/25/02 DRC Meeting NA
1 Date DRe
I Publication Date 9/28/02 Tentative PC Date 10/14/02 Tentative CC NA
Date
I 60 Day Review Date 11/15/02 Review Extension 1/14/03 ~
-
I :\02files\02variances\02-097\referral.doc
Page 1
I have reviewed the attached proposed request (Liesener Variance) for the following:
'r-
I
I
I
II
I
Water
Sewer
Zoning
Parks
Assessment
Policy
Septic System
Erosion Control
Recommendation:
Comments:
Signed:
City Code
Storm Water
Flood Plain
Natural Features
Electric
Grading
Signs
County Road Access
Legal Issues
Roads! Access
Gas
Other
Building Code
Approval
Denial
Conditional Approval
Date:
Please return any comments by Thursdav. October 3.2002, to
Cynthia Kirchoff
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: (952) 447-9813
Fax: (952) 447-4245
e-mail: ckirchoff@cityofpriorlake.com
I :\02files\02variances\02-097\referral.doc
Page 2
September 23, 2002
Mark 1. Liesener
8679 Sunset Court
Shakopee, MN 55379-8077
RE: Case File No.: 02-097, Variances for the construction of a single family dwelling
Dear Mr. Liesener:
Thank you for submitting revised plans on September 16, 2002, for the above
referenced development application. The City of Prior Lake has determined that all of
the necessary information for the above referenced application has been received. This
letter serves as your official notification that your application is now complete. The
City will now begin formal review. At this time, your application for variances is
scheduled for the Monday, October 14, 2002, Planning Commission meeting. You or
your representative must attend this meeting.
The City review process can be substantially less than 120 days, and we intend to
progress in a timely manner that provides a complete and professional review.
Occasionally, however, due to meeting schedules, it is sometimes necessary to extend
the 60-day review period. This letter also serves as your official notice that the City is
extending the 60-day deadline for an additional 60 days from November 15, 2002, to
January 14,2003.
If you have questions relative to the review process or related issues, please feel free to
contact me at (952) 447-9813.
Sincerely,
Cg1Tn-a=~
Cynthia R. Kirchoff, AICP
Planner
L:\02FILES\02variances\02-097\Complete App.DOC
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
(fP~~
u!\~
~NE~
August 19,2002
Mark L. Liesener
8679 Sunset Court
Shakopee, MN 55379-8077
RE: Review For Variance Application Completeness
Dear Mr. Liesener:
The Planning Department has received a variance application for the construction of a
single family dwelling on property located at 4150 Jackson Trail (Lot 13, Block 2, Titus
2nd Addition). The following information is necessary to process your application:
I. Submit a certificate of survey indicating:
a) the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWL) of the creek.
b) the proposed setback from the OHWL of the creek.
c) total impervious surface coverage area.
2. Proposed building plans.
3. A written description of specific variances requested.
Once you have submitted the above information, the City will process your application
and schedule this item for a public hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to
contact me at (952) 447-9813.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
. -_..{ Ie Yfj
. ~ _:----,,7 /
( ~)r) +t-L~_. .I ",.Cr " J ":\
Cynthia R. Kirchoff,1VCP
Planner
L: \02FILES\02variances\02-097\Incomplete Ltr .DOC
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
I have reviewed the attached proposed request (Liesener Variance) for the following:
1 Water
I Sewer
I Zoning
II Parks
I Assessment
Policy
I Septic System
I Erosion Control
Recommendation:
1rf'?(2tt?Vh-
~TIt.
-
r4
v,tS,
l
I
I
City Code
Storm Water
Flood Plain
Natural Features
Electric
Grading
Signs
County Road Access
Legal Issues
Roads/Access
Gas
Other
Building Code
Approval
./" Denial
Conditional Approval
.;
~T, Co. ~\JIPoN""1~
.. - " -
I'7T?:;:' (NDl\JlD~~ l~Ovt- ~'1S~
I~ ON ~\ f:::, ,~ RiLdl Lq-
t> . I ~'( H-. W. t-"I. ~ (~cl)"J &>t= ~D
boO
c.....
,
oL,
~/~A=rtOt-J eF a 1~.W,~1. oF- .f<1\1ER
vJaL. ?~ENT" ~~ P ~V~
p -
l"':::>'f S P'~~~~ 1'0 ~/6I-<-
. I
I!iJ J .
r;/ . I ,
kLcl.. ....
I IY~
Signed:
! /
7'h~~
I I
Date:
Please return any comments by Thursdav. October 3. 2002. to
Cynthia Kirchoff
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: (952) 447-9813
Fax: (952) 447-4245
e-mail: ckirchoff@cityofpriorlake.com
1:\02files\02variances\02-097\referral.doc
Page 2
r-:
--;_... "1
~ J2 RtN ~~ SEP 30.
ota e me a r e~ eli'
~aters- entrRHton. eto amerm~ t. a ,~5~~~~l:;)
Telephone: (651) 772-7910 Fax: (651) 772-19 7 -_.~
September 26, 2002
Ms. Cynthia Kirchoff
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372
RE: Mark Liesener Variance Application. Unnamed Tributary
Dear Ms. Kirchoff:
I have reviewed the materials you sent me regarding the proposed variance request. Our office reviewed requests
for variances on this parcel in both November and December of 1999, and provided comment at that time.
I note that the 1999 variance application depicted a home on the parcel !'.'"i'osed to be set back 30 feet from the
watercourse (versus the 100 feet required by ordinance), and that the latest variance request seeks approval to be
setback 24 feet.
Looking at the survey, it appears reorienting the home in a north-south fashion. closer to the west i"uyerty line, can
increase the structure setback from the watercourse. On the enclosed copy of the survey, I took the liberty of
drawing a building envelope comparable in dimension to that on the original survey, and turned it as I suggested.
This increases the setback :from the watercourse to nearly 60 feet. Please look in to whether this is a feasible
alternative. Ifnot, I would expect that a setback of at least 30 feet, as proposed in 1999, can be met.
DNR has not objection to the variance from minimum lot size.
The watercourse does not have a federally designated floodplain associated with it. Section 1104.308(3)b. requires
the lowest floor of a structure be at least three feet above the flood of record, three feet above the ordinary high
water level (OHW), or by conducting a technical evaluation to establish a flood protection elevation. If multiple
"i'...."aches are used, the highest flood protection elevation determined must be used for placing the low floor.
The proposed lowest floor of 805 .9' should be compared against the OHW, which for watercomses is the top of the
bank of the channel. From the materials submitted to me for review, it was not clear where the top of channel is.
The low floor should be no less than 3 feet above the OHW.
Please call me at 651-772-7917 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~4n~
Patrick 1. Lynch ill
DNR Area Hydrologist
DNR Information: 651-296-6157 · 1-888-646-6367 · ITY: 651-296-5484 · 1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Values Diversity
o
Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a
Minimum of 20% Post-Consumer Waste
?r~ ~ {>..:*- /....r~ JAlik:.?OH -rtzA\ L
\)rJ(l.- v.)~ (~\u... A\V.J< 1fAIL) ^\)~ . ,
9,~W'n- ~ 1""_b~~~_._ rtJD' ___~~'_ ~~:
VJ 7"- i~-j,< el~._i t ,~' --'1~ ./-:;Z.40- . I,/T
l> (I · fA..- '" "'" f
I " · I L"
~ ~ .t · 1,1 J
l'> i ,~ I ~ - i ",.I 1l'Jj ,
_.l'~ -r. rJ j U \, f7 f~
, ,,'II' ~ 'I ~ ^ '1/./ ,,~,
\ ~ ~ ~J
t)'Y \ (~ T
^~~ \ ~ I q-- -$ ! (~-- _1_ ^
.~ . . c::::.....-',......,' . tS.o . - I - __ o..r)n.~j .
'" '" '\ _I~bf.,. ,.. -.. ."... ~ '--" VL'v.. .
dJ~ .A'':' 1\ . ~~, tJ:2 =0 rtt; ~ (~'tV'f.
v: fr;. 'IY. (l Q ",I '32-'0" :'!. JI/ / ( v-
r\J I 0 -~ >,;: ,.1,11, I ~.
.,~~ ~'\ q!-';f , f<l?ftsc D -.t ".
SJcl" -~ l.- . j ,) ~Sl ~":"NGE &O':~. if' \ IN
U>~ ~~~. ~r<I1.M-I' BZC~ ~~i'~\ \
~ c;.;fb ~ ~"'Ilfl~, . . ,~ ~~'Y, !I
' f ,.Ji'.. ... ':l... .,,'1. I ;11
'"'I ~ )" riP". ft}' .
I · ~~'"'~) / 'I
I. . , . tJT'''' , .9''''/
I ~~~I1\'
I 0 ~ . , . I (S
· r-fs::..~T1/"1iY I OMIIIA~ ~~I1t:Nr=-
/<--
I
I
#~~
,
I
~/ /'.'/
...~VJ /'
'l/~' ./'
....~ /'"
, I
\.
to1.b
I
./
",
./
./
qfJ?;
Type <<
5~,
~4l
t
\V,~t? VeNt
L Lor A~
\-{~~~t1
~.. tf \-\~
1
,
\
\
\
\
~. :,-,;,.~:7.:~_
......'.;t;, \ " ,".
~'(",.'~';}. I~" ~,'~, '--I.'
/'. '
t.o' (1
"'; .c,.(:"
/.~'i. .-e . ,~;
:>; L<.' ~"'}... .;
l. -~... #{7.I. '"'{":iI".
i :.:~: . ~V .< tt:;-
\'.o'~ JI:' o~. ~
\;.. .\ '(,";;"., ' 1;;,
"':~-'. "'"..~~. 'q
\f.' -. 'l'f-'
'<~, {t'~.~ _.
.....~~t: !.) l 9
-~~..
,
I
J
,:,:;._\;~: I
. . ,
:?; SEP
:. ;
: :,1\'
" I
iJ~L-
I
i
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
./
,.
/"
October 9,2002
Mark L. Liesener
8679 Sunset Court
Shakopee, MN 55379-8077
RE: Agenda and Agenda Report
Attached is a Planning Commission Agenda and Staff Report for the October 14,
2002, Planning Commission meeting. You or your representatives are expected
to attend the meeting. You will be given the opportunity to sp~k regarding your
proposal and the staff report. The meeting begins at-6:30 (;~m:- and is held at the
Fire Station located at 16776 Fish Point Road (east of HWY 13 on the south side
of CR 21). If you cannot attend the meeting, please call me so your item can be
deferred to the next Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 447-9810.
Sincerely,
Connie Carfson
Connie Carlson
Planning Dept. Secretary
Enclosure
I:\deptwork\blankfrm\meetltr.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.L Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
October 15, 2002
Anthony Stamson
Planning Commission Chair
16095 Wren Court SE
Prior Lake, N:1N 55372
Dear Mr. Stamson:
Enclosed please fmd Variance Resolutions 02-011PC and 02-016PC for Richard Gau, 16994
Monroe Avenue SW, and Resolutions 02-014PC and 02-015PC for Mark Liesener, 4525
Jackson Trail, as adopted by the Planning Commission on October 14,2002. Please review
and sign the Resolutions and return them in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 447-9813.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
~~~
CyntHia R. Kir~ho
Planner
Enclosures
.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
October 15, 2002
Mr. Patrick Lynch
Dept. of Natural Resources
Waters Division
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, MN 55106-6793
RE: Case File No.: 02-097, 4525 Jackson Trail (lvIark Liesener)
Dear Mr. Lynch:
This letter is to inform you that on October 15, 2002, the Planning Commission approved
the following variances for the above referenced property:
1. A 52,492 square foot variance from the required minimum 2 acre lot area in the
R-S zoning district to allow a 34,628 square foot lot (Zoning Ordinance Section
1102.306 (3) Dimensional Standards.)
2. A 70 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an unnamed
tributary watercourse to allow a 30 foot setback (Zoning Ordinance Section
1104.301 (3) Setback Requirements.)
The resolution approving the variance, one executed, will be forwarded to you.
Should you have any questions in the interim, please feel free to contact me at
(952) 447-9813.
Sincerely,
~(I~rhfJ8
Cynthia R. Kirchoff, Ala
Planner
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
RESOLUTION 02-014PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 54,492 SQUARE FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
MINIMUM 2 ACRE LOT AREA FOR PROPERTIES ZONED RS (RURAL
SUBDMSION RESIDENTIAL) AND A 70 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIRED 100 FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
W Al~KCOURSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Mark Liesener has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit the
construction of a single family dwelling on property located in the R-S (Rural Subdivision
Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay) Districts at the following location, to wit;
4525 Jackson Trial, Prior Lake, MN, legally described as follows: Lot 13, Block 2,
Titus 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in Case
#02-097PC and held a hearing thereon on October 14, 2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The property is a legal, nonconforming lot. Although it was legally platted in 1974, it does
not meet the current minimum lot area required for properties zoned R-S. Thus, the strict
application of the ordinance would result in an undue hardship upon the property owner
because without the variance the property cannot be developed.
5. The lot complies with minimum lot width required of properties in the R-S zoning
district, but a 100 foot setback from the OHW of the tributary watercourse limits the
buildable width to a range of 15 to 25 feet, so strict interpretation of the ordinance would
result in difficulties in using the lot for a single family dwelling.
6. The property is a substandard lot of record and is unbuildable without relief from
minimum dimensional requirements. The 100 foot setback from the tributary watercourse
is a unique condition applying to a few properties within the vicinity.
7. The lot area variance is essential for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right. A reasonable use cannot be constructed within the buildable area, so a
1: \02files \02variances \02-097\approve resolution.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
variance from the minimum tributary watercourse setback is necessary for the enjoyment
of the property.
8. The granting of the lot area variance will not be contrary to the intent of the R-S zoning
district, which states that its purpose is to provide suitable areas for large lot development
outside of the MUSA.
9. A demonstrable hardship is present to warrant variances from minimum lot area, because
without relief the property would remain unbuildable.
10. The applicant did not create the nonconforming lot, so the hardship results from the
application of the provisions of the zoning ordinance and not from action of the applicant.
11. The contents of Planning Case #02-097PC are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following variances to allow for the construction of a single family dwelling:
1. A 52,492 square foot variance from the required minimum 2 acre lot area in the R-
S zoning district to allow a 34,628 square foot lot (Zoning Ordinance Section
1102.306 (3) Dimensional Standards.)
2. A 70 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an unnamed tributary
watercourse to allow a 30 foot setback (Zoning Ordinance Section 1104.301 (3)
Setback Requirements.)
The following conditions shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit for
the construction of a single family dwelling on the subject site:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. Proof of
recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be submitted to the
Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state agency
regulations.
3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits for an Individual Sewage Treatment
System (ISTS) from Scott County.
4. The ISTS shall comply with applicable regulations.
5. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted with the building permit application.
1: \02files \02variances \02-097\approve resolution.doc
2
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on October 11:~
Anthony t Stanfson, Commission Chair
r~ST: () f)
LJ}t~ ?fJn- h
Donald R. Rye, Planning ~ector
1: \02files \02variances \02-097\approve resolution.doc
3
Established In 1962
\
\
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY t IHC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7801 73rd A..nu. Norlh 812-&80-3003
rell No. lI8O-3&22
o Oenot.. Woo<! Hub s.t
for .xcavotlon only
.noo.n Denote. Exl.tln9 Elevation
8 Oenot.. Propo..d Elevation
Oenot.. Surfac. Drolnave
NOTE: Propoled fTadee lII"e eubject
to re.lAt. of .0R t..t..
Propo.ed bufldl"'J information
No flood elevation avaflable frOltl must be cheeked with approved
City engi neeri ng or watershed dept. I>ulIdIn9 pion and dev.'., . or
fTo<!ln9 pm befor. excavation
and construction.
Property is located in Zone X per Boa L
C~.tnity Panel No. 270432 0002 C ,.Propo.ed Top 01 lIIock
Dated Nov.etllber 19. 1997. ~oll. ,PropO.'d Gor<Mj' floor
50S. <t _ Propo."d Lowe.t floor
T~~~f 9uIklln9
5 ~t.SE lWuoano..J
JUnneepoU.. IIlnneoole tIlI428
&urutyors UItrtifirnlt
.,)
"> / Il~-
~ t'. t'..
<\' I,
~ : ~ I i
l! It I
t.) -1~~1 ~-1~
.,fo.':'.y. I~. _0
/lY (\ 0 ",t' '" :t
\'I 3"2.0
f ]) . Pta?Fb5€D
1 I J{ . : ~e$1 DEHC.6
, .\1.T''''' 8"2.'d'
-S> I ... - -.'
~ ",'l~ l ~
r 0"
f'i" ~~..
MIKE 11AYE5
Property located in Section
23. Township 115. Range 22.
Scott County. Hi nnesota
JA{A:::'~oH
,~ ( ~\u., A\lJ,)<
_u~,~~:~,+. ,;.. -..' _#'..
",v;.
~
,s
'r
,
~~
,
, "
.,~_.
10
",';I
~l
'\ .
-- ,5',)
tlf/lnY I P/lI'IINA~
,~~
~~~
I r,~.
I :
1/ I' ) I:
#-!'f\~,' / ,.
l ' I.~'I /
l l L"'~
" "7 Iff
. ~~t rJu1'f<": E't-E:vA-r'''.... ..p:
1; / JZ.?AO "vriJZ-
,pI. ~~~/ 1/ ClILvGl"-1" . f,O??
~\;: -$. ! 1-. -1-
-:>.0 .. I I -~ wz.~ VON10~1":'
~~. ~,lrl / (; (<f""l'f "~ ""-~l'-
. .' [!. \ (\)
'~;i>:t . \ \ / ~p V~~ w...\..LJ.
" ~ ",IV I t.. Let"'" "fZe-A .. ~':Iq, ,...
~ ~ . I '\~ I'V-.et;)~tf- 1"0fll\L .. c;,1\'='~1'I
,'KJ I ~.. tf l-\AfOtv/tf-,.. 14.f;>.,..
'IY . '\
/ \1 t
, .1'; t
\
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
recommended by builder.
~\L
"\fAIL.) "-.') ~
tf'.
r/J~
l.
tt)' -' -\ 10'2..40 - -
.t~
t
~
5::>'0"
I <s
U/'P1!11t:Nr~ ,
r
/
/,......... ,/ /'
/--:"Y" /"
I /~\?fJ':'1 ./ /'
, ......-....-"""-
:Y' ////
SOl-b --.....-. /"". ....-
",..-
".
The only eOllemente ahown are fiom pial. of record or lnforrnolion
,..ovlded by cNen\. ... ....
We hereby certify 'hot this i. 0 true and correct repre.entotion or
o ."rvey of the boundar Ie. of 'he above "'eerlhed land arid 'he
location of .. bulldlnq. and vl.ible encrooehment.. if ony, Irnm or on
.oid land.
Survey.d by ua 'hl.~duy "r .Julv 19J.JI
ATTACHMENT 1
INVOICE NO. fa3269 .
F.B.NO. 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30'
o Denot.. Iron Nonument
LM" ~~A'.
HIc'Z.f!> ~lt
t'.1t>.> Joe. ,..e~
\
1(- i,
.!:,\. sa> , 6. :, J\I'
,I' I ~
1J\.lL-..- .-!:
I
lot 13. Block 2. TITUS 2ND ADDITION
1.'\ .
, /!
. ") ~ / i '
f4",wr- \\-,,2,. '/ .
!'?E-J.1.3.o2. (~,\ Gk~-Q . )/1.--
\I '--s~ .
f-V'. \'Z--tp..ol WUlL Chmtl. r. Ander.on. NInn. Reo. No7175J or
y?tV\0eO ~ \', \':)1>> Gr..,.,..y R. Pr_"", Nlnn Reo No. 241192
RESOLUTION 02-015PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 76 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE 100 FOOT
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
WATERCOURSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE F AMIL Y
DWELLING
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake,
Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Mark Liesener has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to
permit the construction of a single family dwelling on property located in the
R-S (Rural Subdivision Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay) Districts at the
following location, to wit;
4525 Jackson Trial, Prior Lake, MN, legally described as follows: Lot 13,
Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as
contained in Case #02-097PC and held a hearing thereon on October 14,2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The 100 foot setback from the tributary watercourse is a unique condition
applying to a few properties within the vicinity. However, a reasonable use,
which is considered a single family dwelling with a two stall garage, can be
constructed on the property without the large setback variance.
5. The granting of the setback variance will impact the character and development
of this area. Permitting the construction of the proposed structure 24 feet from
the OHW of the watercourse will affect the perceived health, safety, and
comfort of the immediate area.
I :\02files\02variances\02-097\deny resol ution .doc
1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. The shoreland ordinance intends to "preserve and enhance the quality of
surface waters, preserve the economic and natural environmental values of
shoreland, and provide for the wise utilization of waters and related land
resources." The requested 76 foot variance from the required setback appears
to be inconsistent with the intent of the shoreland ordinance.
7. The 76 foot setback variance could be reduced, so the variance serves as a
convenience to the applicant.
8. Although the strict application of the ordinance creates an undue hardship, the
proposed 24 foot setback is a direct result of the actions of the applicant. A
reasonable use can be constructed on the property with a 70 foot variance.
9. The contents of Planning Case #02-097PC are hereby entered into and made a
part of the public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variance to allow the construction of a single family dwelling as shown in
Attachment 1 - Certificate of Survey:
1) A 76 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an
unnamed tributary watercourse to allow a 24 foot setback (Zoning
Ordinance Section 1104.301 (3) Setback Requirements.)
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on October 14,2002.
j~--
Anthony J. Stamson, Commission Chair
rR~ f) i
~~d R. RY~l:mt.g Director
I :\02files\02variances\02-097\deny resolution.doc
2
EstabUshed In 1962
ATTACHMENT 1
,
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS or STATE OF MINNESOTA
INVOICE NO 63269 '
r.B.NO 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30'
71101 7Srd A'unu. North
o Denol.. Iron Monument
o D.....'.. Wood HtJb s.,
lor .xcavatlon only
.noo.11 Denot.. bl.tlnv Elevation
e Denot.. Propo..d Elevation
Denot.. Surfac. Drolna9.
NOTE: Propo..d lrode. or. _iect
to rellAt. of .0M tllte.
Propoeed buIIdln<J Informatlon
muet b. """"".d with approved
buIIdIn9 plan - development or
lrad1n9 plan b.for. .xcavatlon
_ conetructlon.
Property is located in Zone X per 80'1 , Pr
COIIIUnity Panel 110. 270432 0002 C . _'" Top of IlIock
Dated IloW!lllber 19, 1997. /) 0 ~b PrOPO'''' Oar...,. Floor
~os. . _pr""".r Low.., Floor
TY~';I IluIIdInv
$ ~t.SE fWuoono..J
JUnn..poll.. IIlnn..ota GlI428
1I12-01l0-300S
r... No. OlIO-SOU
"
g.urUl"ynrs atl"rtifirub
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
rec~nded by builder.
HIKE HAYES
Property located in Section
23, Township 115, Range 22.
Scott County, Hi nnesota
JAu~boH
t.tJ ~ ( ~\u.. ^\V~
~..J.~~"'~__ 7- ---- ,po.
.;-':1
..l
.,. "."~
~ t.\ I
~ I i I I
~ I ~
-z: ,('J g-
~ I': I ) P
~ r A-~
.f~ .f~~J ~
.;g o~ ~'o"
\ -
f 1)
1 I I ~
"1'['
~. ',......:..-Ir
G.I .fl'l~
r 0"
~ ,~. #'
I
t
,
~~
,
, ,
vP":-.--
5::>'0"
~o
J:t
Pl<l?fb5€"D
. : K'E:$I DEHc.e
e-z.'d'
.l@)
.fl. .
-,
,fl'
r:~wl
10 I
(- -r S'.'urtt..nY I ~/NA4G
, qIfJ.....
I
I
" I ,./---
I~ //'
S01.b ----- - ,/"' /
/'
//,'"
.,~~
/~,?f)' ../ /'
---
"'
The onty 8011ement. shown are 1iom pats at record or inforrnution
provided by cHent. ~ -
We hereby certify thot thia is a true and correct representation of
Q !It.wvey 0' the boundaries of the above d.~crihed fond and the
location 0' aI buildinq. ond yisible encroachments. if any, from or on
..,;d land.
S.,veyed by ,,~ lhi'~r1"y "r .JulY
1l!JJ
/'
#- //t~/
l I/t"
l .J.? L"'~
I ~7 tt'f
\ ~~. f t.lo-nt: l"l-f::"A1"t"N .;::
~ / ,z...A.O ,,0/9'1'-
..:_ -+ ./ffJ /' _I. _ '''""H' "'M
= IS.o {,f 1 (' ~ (;:~~~I~^1'~f-
-Q ~ f(l/ t "t-
~ . , I r;:
. .. rtl' \ N
~o~_~ ~ /
t ~.~ II
,~r6f" I \1
~'I. I ,\
/ \1
,t]f;
No flood elevation available from
City engineering or watershed dept.
~\L
'lfA\\..) .....') ~
~-
.,,':4
tr; , "-- -\ \Q'Z..40 - -
.r~
t
~
! (S
~~nt:.NT',-
/<-
./
/'
,
,/
-"'
.r}l'. 'V
~~.
r,~.
I I
,
I ) ,:
, .
I ,
LC1" .A ~A. :
H"''Z.e> ~.H_
t'.1~ J,.:;~e~
\\^~" voVt-t<=- w..LU.
L. L..or ,..~;. .. ~.;I;>, ...
1-1"'fZ\:'u:lJtf 'f~ . c;l\r;;.<<1't
tJ.. 'f I-\AfVtv/t.f- '" 14. f;> '7"
\
\
\
,
\
SU'I6WR : II;
_ -JL:J
"
:1'.\
d UL----
I
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
1. i.
. ~ I '
f'-c-v. ~ \I ~o~ / )!;' .
~l'oZ ("t! p.-iJ...,.. U:e>Q lhD,-
fl-V'. I"Z--tp..ol ~ftU:i. Chrrlll~ r. "nrI~..on. Mm. Re9. ""117153 or
f?tv\~O ~ I', \~ (hqory R. Pr",",,, NInn RlIO ..... 24992
~~
~NE~
RESOLUTION 02-014PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 54,492 SQUARE FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
MINIMUM 2 ACRE LOT AREA FOR PROPERTIES ZONED RS (RURAL
SUBDMSION RESIDENTIAL) AND A 70 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIRED 100 FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
WATERCOURSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Mark Liesener has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit the
construction of a single family dwelling on property located in the R-S (Rural Subdivision
Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay) Districts at the following location, to wit;
4525 Jackson Trial, Prior Lake, MN, legally described as follows: Lot 13, Block 2,
Titus 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in Case
#02-097PC and held a hearing thereon on October 14,2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The property is a legal, nonconforming lot. Although it was legally platted in 1974, it does
not meet the current minimum lot area required for properties zoned R-S. Thus, the strict
application of the ordinance would result in an undue hardship upon the property owner
because without the variance the property cannot be developed.
5. The lot complies with minimum lot width required of properties in the R-S zoning
district, but a 100 foot setback from the OHW of the tributary watercourse limits the
buildable width to a range of 15 to 25 feet, so strict interpretation of the ordinance would
result in difficulties in using the lot for a single family dwelling.
6. The property is a substandard lot of record and is unbuildable without relief from
minimum dimensional requirements. The 100 foot setback from the tributary watercourse
is a unique condition applying to a few properties within the vicinity.
7. The lot area variance is essential for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right. A reasonable use cannot be constructed within the buildable area, so a
1: \02files \02variances\02-097\approve resolution. doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.L Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
variance from the minimum tributary watercourse setback is necessary for the enjoyment
of the property.
8. The granting of the lot area variance will not be contrary to the intent of the R-S zoning
district, which states that its purpose is to provide suitable areas for large lot development
outside of the MUSA.
9. A demonstrable hardship is present to warrant variances from minimum lot area, because
without relief the property would remain unbuildable.
10. The applicant did not create the nonconforming lot, so the hardship results from the
application of the provisions of the zoning ordinance and not from action of the applicant.
11. The contents of Planning Case #02-097PC are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following variances to allow for the construction of a single family dwelling:
1. A 52,492 square foot variance from the required minimum 2 acre lot area in the R-
S zoning district to allow a 34,628 square foot lot (Zoning Ordinance Section
1102.306 (3) Dimensional Standards.)
2. A 70 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an unnamed tributary
watercourse to allow a 30 foot setback (Zoning Ordinance Section 1104.301 (3)
Setback Requirements.)
The following conditions shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit for
the construction of a single family dwelling on the subject site:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. Proof of
recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be submitted to the
Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state agency
regulations.
3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits for an Individual Sewage Treatment
System (ISTS) from Scott County.
4. The ISTS shall comply with applicable regulations.
5. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted with the building permit application.
.
1: \02files \02variances \02-097\approve resolution. doc
2
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on October 14, 2002. ~
Anth4:;t Stanlson, Commission Chair
pTEST: ()!J
L }r~..QJ) !\ _ )::;;
Donald R. Rye, Planning ~ector
.
1: \02files \02variances \02-097\approve resolution. doc
3
RESOLUTION 02-015PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 76 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE 100 FOOT
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
WATERCOURSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake,
Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Mark Liesener has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to
permit the construction of a single family dwelling on property located in the
R-S (Rural Subdivision Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay) Districts at the
following location, to wit;
4525 Jackson Trial, Prior Lake, MN, legally described as follows: Lot 13,
Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as
contained in Case #02-097PC and held a hearing thereon on October 14, 2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The 100 foot setback from the tributary watercourse is a unique condition
applying to a few properties within the vicinity. However, a reasonable use,
which is considered a single family dwelling with a two stall garage, can be
constructed on the property without the large setback variance.
5. The granting of the setback variance will impact the character and development
of this area. Permitting the construction of the proposed structure 24 feet from
the OHW of the watercourse will affect the perceived health, safety, and
comfort of the immediate area.
..
I :\02files\02variances\02-097\deny resolution .doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.L Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. The shoreland ordinance intends to "preserve and enhance the quality of
surface waters, preserve the economic and natural environmental values of
shoreland, and provide for the wise utilization of waters and related land
resources." The requested 76 foot variance from the required setback appears
to be inconsistent with the intent of the shoreland ordinance.
7. The 76 foot setback variance could be reduced, so the variance serves as a
convenience to the applicant.
8. Although the strict application of the ordinance creates an undue hardship, the
proposed 24 foot setback is a direct result of the actions of the applicant. A
reasonable use can be constructed on the property with a 70 foot variance.
9. The contents of Planning Case #02-097PC are hereby entered into and made a
part of the public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variance to allow the construction of a single family dwelling as shown in
Attachment 1 - Certificate of Survey:
1) A 76 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an
unnamed tributary watercourse to allow a 24 foot setback (Zoning
Ordinance Section 1104.301 (3) Setback Requirements.)
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on October 14,2002.
/J~--
Antho.ny J. Stamson, Commission Chair
C]. TEST: ~ ()
~ )(/
onald R. Rye: l~n&~ Director
I :\02files\02variances\02-097\deny resolution .doc
2
j
J.LabU.bed In 1982
ATTACHMEN'" 1
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
INVOICE NO 63269'
r.B.NO 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" == 30 I
RECISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS OF STATE OF lllNNESOTA
780t 73rd Anuu. Iforth lIt2-HG-3OO:J
r.z No. HO-3112S1
HIKE lIAYES
o o-t.. "on Monomont
C 0.....1.. W_ Hub 5.1
lor .... "'J, only
.roo.n D_t.. Exl.tlnv EJovatlon
eO-I.. Prope..d ElevatlOft
--- 0.....1.. Surtac. Drafn090
NOTE: Pr~.d ~adH or. IUbj.cl
to ,........ at lOll I.....
Prope.'" bulIdlnq Intormallon
mull be eheel<ed wllh ."",.""""
buIdlng pkIn _ dove . . 1 or
~adInq plan bel.". excavation
_ _Irucllon.
Property is located in Zone X per 8 O~., Pr "" T f _
C_mity Panel Ita. 270432 0002 C &0" I - Ilf> 0
Dated ltoYA!lllber 19. 1997. u ~\:7Pr~'" Oar_ Floor
~QS. . _ "'C::;.~ low..1 Floor
Typo 01 IIuIldIn9
S ~t.U fMJoanO"'>
IlIuue.poU.. IIlull....t. llll428
l!turutynrJ QItrtifirult
P. .p.' ty located in Section
23. Township 115. Range 22.
Scott County, Mi nnesota
JAv~boH
~IJ -:.. (~Iu.. A\V,)<
"J'-" fJ'l.
........,k "'-' -... ---.
-,,--~. ~. I' I
i
.~
j I t
()J'
~~
,
, ,
.,~
I
..l
~
- t:.-
~ r
~ I i I
~ I ~
, ('J I g.
1: 1/;1 )
~ i'i
~ . + ~:
.. -IJ'-X' 1 ,'i"';~- '-1-:: 5:::>'0"
cf':'/f.. J~' .0
.g 0 32.'0" ~
J :=0 . f'kt>Fb5€D
I I ~ . , K'€Sloel'4c.e
, "
1 '\1.e*.~ e-zo
~'~-- ~~~ \ ~
~ 0':' ~
i'i~ ~.
I
",':l
10
'4
""
~~t'"
..'-- i S"ttm.rrY I ~/N'A<<'
NOTE:PropDsed elevations shown
reco.lended by builder.
No flood elevation available fraa
City engineering or watershed dept.
~\L
1fAI\-) ) _\'
~:v'
I.,
It) , -. -\ \o'Z..40 -
.t~
rI'':'
~~11
I I"'"'~.
I ;
1/ /' ) ,:
~j'Ar;' W,/ /,.
~ f, LC1" ft.~A:
"r . 1,/ / ~"''''"l.e> ~.~~.
t~ 1.'1 L~~ i t';1~ ).~~g'!o
\ i ~
~ f~t IJo-n<: fol.F;"",r/Dfo/ .;=
~~ / ~"'" ooJliF-
..~ _ ~ . 1ft'! / ~ _I. M.." . .....
:o"'~]~/1r i -{~~~r;,"~f-
~ . I I ~
. .' ~. \ N
~~"1t \ ~ I ~D tI~~ /.IAU-I.
t ~ IV I L t..cr ,,~;. - ~<;O;>' .,..
~ ~~. " \~ \-l"f!;)u:IJ~ ~0f'll<L - S>l\c;,<1'l:
#J I ;\ '7- 'f f\AfC7l~t.f-... 14.177..
/ \1
'~"'/ \
r\
~\
.\
I \
}
I
f
I I /"
I I~ .../
1/- , .,-
101.~ -----" - /," /
./
,~';-
./.",
/--:~
. -P'I V
/~,\,I'" ./
"
t
~
\
\
\
I
~~I1G'f'r;... /
r
/
/'
/
/'
SU) 16~ I'
, II
. -' L/'
;
:'\
:J Ui-----
I
/'
/
Lot 13. Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
..
1'1..11'
1" i.
. ,( ) /' )
f4oJ, wr \I-c>z, I )!./ '
!<N1.3-oZ. (~,' l!/d.Q (J.C..-
II '-5lqnod .
fl-VI. \'2.-<;..01 ~ o.m.... F. """"'"an. Mm. Roq. "",7175J or
~V\~o ~ \'. I~ Or..,.,.., R. Pr"""" lIIrn Rtoq Nt>. 74992
^'....."..., "'...-
,.
The only eGIIementa Jhown are from p'ots of record 0( in'ormution
provided b, client. ... -
We hereby certify lhat t~i. i. 0 'rue and correct repre.enlolion 01
o ..'v.\, of the boundar Ie. 01 the abovo de.c,ihed knl 011<1 I~"
location of 01 buildinq. and visible oneraac_ts. il any. 'rom or on
.aid Iond.
Julv
S.....,.yed by lot" 'hitl~rtoy (II
''''''''
ASSENT OF APPLICANT
~
As Approved by Resolution # 02-014PC
The undersigned hereby assents to the following:
1. I have read the conclusions and conditions of said Resolution, and I am familiar with
their contents and with the content ofthe exhibits.
2. I fully accept all ofthe terms and conditions of said Resolution.
3. I understand Section 1108.400 of the Prior Lake Ordinance Code provides as follows:
1108.413 Revocation and Cancellation of a Variance. A Variance may be
revoked and canceled if the Zoning Administrator determines that the
holder of an existing Variance has violated any of the conditions or
requirements imposed as a condition to approval of the Variance, or has
violated any other applicable laws, ordinances, or enforceable regulation.
11 08.414 After One Year. No Construction Reouired. All Variances shall be
revoked and canceled if 1 year has elapsed from the date of the adoption
of the resolution granting the Variance and the holder of the Variance
has failed to make substantial use of the premises according to the
provisions contained in the Variance.
1108.415 After One Year. New Construction Reouired. All Variances shall be
revoked and canceled after 1 year has elapsed from the date of the
adoption of the resolution granting the Variance if a new structure or
alteration or substantial repair of an existing building is required by the
Variance and the holder has failed to complete the work, unless a valid
building permit authorizing such work has been issued and work is
progressing in an orderly way.
1108.416 Uoon Occurrence of Certain Events. If the holder of a Variance fails
to make actual use of vacant land, or land and structures which were
existing when the Variance was issued and no new structure, alteration
or substantial repair to existing buildings was required; or if a new
structure was required by the Variance and no building permit has been
obtained, the Variance shall be deemed revoked and canceled upon the
occurrence of any of the following events:
(1) A change in the Use District for such lands is made by amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance by the City Council.
L:\02FILES\02variances\02-097\Assent Form.DOC 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
(2) Eminent domain proceedings have been initiated to take all or any
part of the premises described in the Variance.
(3) The use described in the Variance becomes an illegal activity under
the laws of the United States of America or the State of Minnesota.
(4) Title to all or part of land described in such Variance is forfeited to
the State of Minnesota for nonpayment of taxes.
(5) The person to whom the Variance was issued files a written statement
in which that person states that the Variance has been abandoned.
The statement shall describe the land involved or state the resolution
number under which the Variance was granted.
(6) The premises for which the Variance was issued are used by the
person to whom the Variance was issued in a manner inconsistent
with the provisions of such Variance.
4. I understand the granting by the City ofthis Resolution is in reliance on the
representations that I will fully comply with all of the terms and conditions of said
Resolution. I understand and agree upon notice of non-compliance with any term or
condition, I shall immediately cease conducting activities pursuant to the notice or
will take all actions necessary to accomplish full compliance with said notice and
conditions of the Resolution.
,/~/o}
DATE
~t4~/~~~
, SIGN.A:tURE OF APPLICANT
~~fO~R
4525 JACKSON TRAIL, PRIOR LAKE, MN
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY
L:\02FILES\02variances\02-097\Assent Form.DOC 2
Aerial Photo
Property is located in Zone X per 8"
ConIlJRi ty Panel No. 270432 0002 C 9.' Propooed Top 01 Block
Dated Nov.l!llQer 19, 1997. l) 0 t>.6 Propo.ed Goroqe Floor
~(}S'~_propo.~d Low..t Floor
TY~';f llulldlnll
S Cw~E hNlJoono.J
"
EalllbUahed in 1962
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS OF SUTE OF MINNESOTA
7801 73rd Annue Norlb II I 2-CleO-301l3
Fu No. tlllO-3Cl22
Illooe.poll.. Illon..ola Cltl426
g,urUt!}lJrS aJtrtifirult
MIKE I,^YES
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
recOllended by buflder.
Property located in Section
23, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, "i nnesota
No flood elevation available from
City engineering or watershed dept.
JAv~bOH
.<.~,~ (~\L..L. A\v,)<
,~~ ,po'
~L.......- .....-_.. ,-'
~\L
"1\"'A\ L.)
" ^')~
JI'"
.,J
">
.(.
IV' - -\ If'ZAO - -
~
t)
./"'0.'
. H,
'If
.,fl~
~
"3
C\
-z:
.po':!
~
"
'.-
:"I"
...
~$
, , ,
.,":-.
\
\
\
\
'"
I
I
l
'I I /
I ...
~y/
......
~..~
. ....,\it?':'1 /',/
'/ ~ /'
,/
,/
./
,/
...
"
. ATTACHMENT 6
INVOICE. N
f .B.NO. 838-07,00
SCALE: 1" = 3D'
o Denol.. Iron NonI.mont
o Denote. Wood IIub Set
lor ..eavotlon only
.o{){l.n Denote. bl....... Elovotlon
e Denot.. Propo..d Elevation
Denot.. Surface Drolrloqe
NOTE: Propo.ed Il'odol ore eubject
liD t.eult. 0' eon '..t.o
","""o.ed bulIdlnq InfOfmotlon
mu!lt b. cheeked with approved
l>ulIdlnq plon and d... './ . j ."
ll'odInq plon bel."e e.covollon
and contltructlon.
I
LM" I>~A.:
~ flo"l-f7 ~,f'"
",1~ ).~,.e~
~oT1<: ~1,E;,,^-r,O"" "F
f-~O "vrif'-
~lJLvQfZ-1' . e,03.?
- - WZ.9 "CN10LI~
{'fPttVf"1' t\1t.K \lI^1'~f'
\~D VO'JtJ~ VALi.I.
L \..Or "'~.A. . ~""" ...
\.V~Ot.alt.f 1"~L . SI\<;,<<1'I
<7- 'f I\Afc7tWe.f!-.... 14-.f77..
,
"
II, I
I
!
:!i( SU' I () ~ : Ji'
"'~, LJJ
1\ ..
d ~_ .-l
I
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ^OOITION
,.
'"
( lOA 0. 4 ( JJ)
,.
The only easement. shown are from plols 0' record Of' in'orrnution
provided by eNonl. ... -
We hereby c...lIfy Ih,,1 Ihi. i. 0 true ond cOfr.cl .e!"esenlolinn of p.c.v.4Vr \1-02-
a ",v.y of the boundaries of ,he obovfJ descrhed Innd nnd Ihe rlw::..J" ':l _.., {"I'-'.I...-l.u.\
~~t1::",Of .. buildinq8 and .i.ibte Incro... . .11. if my. 'rom Of
Sur..yed by 118 Ihil---2.t.lLrlny of ,JulY 19-.9. BUILDABLE AREA WITH 40 FOOT VARIANCE
o o.....t.. Iron Monument
o o.""t.. Wood ItJb s.t
lor ..cavotlon only
.ooo.n Denot.. blatln9 Elevation
~ o.""t.. Propo..d Elevation
- Denot.. Surlac. Drolnoq.
NOTE: Propoud 'Tode. "'''' oobject
to re.uto 0/ ooR t..te.
Propo..d bulIdl"9 Inlo<motlo"
""",t b. _eteed wllh _oved
buNd1n9 plon and deve.. _ 1 or
'Todln9 pm h.loro ..covotlon
and conetructlon.
Property is located in Zone X per Boa,
COlI8IIUnfty Panel No. Z7043Z OOOZ C ,. Propo.ed Top 01 1lI0ek
Dated Novetllber 19, 1997. I) 0 1>. b Propo..d Goroqe Floor
~OS,~_propoo~d Loweo' Floor
TY~~I llulIdIn9
5 CweE hNI.loaT100
E.lllbU.hed In 1902
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
71101 73rd "nou. "ortb
812-680-30113
r." "0.680-3622
'J
)lloo..poll.. )lloneool. 66428
g,uru ry ura Cltrrtifirnlt
KlKE IIA'fE) .
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
reconIended by builder.
Property located fn Section
Z3, Townshfp 115, Range ZZ,
Scott County, Minnesota
No flood elevatfon avaflable from
City en9fneerfn9 or watershed dept.
~\L
1fAl\...) ~)~
~.
.J
">
-
tl-
t)
.t-
-os J
\) I'l
1:
..,r-':I ~
::s
\-
()~
~~~ , "
,
.,~--
~
It,) , -. -\ \0'2-.40 - -
I. ~O'
'41'- .
qfJ.
I
~ I
"
t
, ATTACHMENT 5
INVOICE. NC
F.B.NO. 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30'
Lo1'" I>%A '.
? +1o'Z.e. ~.f~.
':;>.1~ )..;.,.e'!'
;Jon;: ,,"~~v^1"t".... ,,""
~A.o "vfiF-
CIlL""f<-1" " f>O??
\'^~D VoVt.>~ bAL1.I.
L Lor ....~~ .. ~~, .-
H"'{ZDL.oJff- '1Ofl\L .. S,1I'=''<ft
r;. 'f l\"'tWlvJt.~" 14.~'7"
\1 "'" i.....;.;.:.;.:.;.;
.. '::") ;iii~i!iiiiiii!iii! BUILDABLE AREA
\.~ \ ..........
... .:.:.:.:-:-:.......
'~~i!F:~ -~; . ':TRI~UTARY
.... ~ ... ....
\1.. ;;J' ..
p. ~
I "l:~
/ I. ~'I
goI.~,' .'.
./
"
/'..
,/"'"fY ./
t.. ...,--:,?J? , ./
.. / ;'
'"
./
,/
/'
".. I:, :: \. .. . , ,I
il" ~l' I G aw i y
I J\\~.,__~UJ
L
1;:
.
Lot 13, 8lock Z, TITUS 2ND ^ODITION
fZ4.."'. ~ \I ,oz.
l<~.1. 3.0
~. \-z.-~ EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA
ffl/l<"~O ~ I' . .. .
Surveyod hy ,,~ 1I,I~JtLdoy or ,JulY
lQ_.9..9
( )()
(Jljr J.n
o o.....t.. Iron """","","t
o o.....t.. Wood Hub s.t
lor".. .11on only
.fIOO.O O.....t.. E.I.llnv Elevation
@ O.....t.. Prapa..d Elevation
. O.....t.. S",'ac. Dr<IincMJ.
NOTE: Propo..d (P""'" are oubj.et
10 ro.ut. 01 .01 te.h.
Propo.1d bulIdl"9 information
No flood elevation available fro. muot b. ehoc:tced with appravld
City engineering or watershed dept. l>uIIdIn9 plan and dove./ .1 or
(p"adInq plan belor. ,,". . lion
and eonotruetlon.
Property is located in Zone X per 80a ,
COIIIIIUnity Panel 110. 270432 0002 ;. ,. .PTopo.ed Top of lIIoek
Dated 1I0vetlber 19. 1997. &O~b PTopo.ed Cor"'ll Floor
~oS. ~_Pr"""'r Lo"..' Floor
Ty~.;r EIuIdInv
5 {kt!;E fO...ruoaT1oJ
~~:v
( "j/"j~'
, .
1/~:: 'J ,:
,# I!~~,' / /
l //[~rl /
'f~,lt
(,eft oJ~~ ~(-l.vA"',,,~ ..;::
r~J. / ~A.O ""rif'-
..",. _... ./if,J /' _I. _ ."'.UH . .'?'
~;'" {tt:,:~:' ~ (~~~~I~^1't,f-
.'~.[I'II ~
~I " , ~. I f:'
.~ IJ':("Y"'~ \ ~
":I . 1 /
.' '~C>~~.I "
~Ut ~I.'
. .rI''Y:\ ~
,?'''- j ~I"
/ ,I~
'~/
EalabU.hed In 1962
LOT SURVEYS COMP ^"Y. I"C.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7801 73rd A..nu. North
812-1180-3003
F... No. lleO-31122
.J
IIlnnl.poll.. IIlnn..ota 111I42B
g,urutyurs ClItrtifirult
. MIKE DAlEs
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
rec. ,,', ded by builder.
Property located in Section
23. Township 115. Range 22.
Scott County. Hi nnesota
JAv~~OH
. 1\4" (~\~ ~!<
~.L...,.. up .. ..
~\L
"1fA\L) ~) ~
=~-
.( , ..L-7
1/')' ---\ IQ'Z.."'tV" - -
./"?
I
I !
..,r-!1
,.1
'> ; II~-
~ i'~\. I I
D ( r I'
I' · I
<t' i I I I '
-:l II
t:I . IN
-r I ~r
.f
'f I
.I)~
! I
't:
, ,..
~
\-
f)~ ,
~~ ,
">..-
of'
l'
-i)~
- I~I:;..
,,-
.p-. ~'o ",I i
'f\! .
f ' ~
I Ii.
I '11.f:+-~.
~'~'~r ~~. .
fi ,'"' .fr,"~ l
I ~. -
,r
I I
, 10 I
.fi"
,II
I (S
~~nOlr,_
/'- h
,""-{S-;UrtltrY I ~/N'A<<.
.qJlfl~
I
I ~.~
. . /,,1"'("" /'
I /: ,?fJ' /"
!~/ >,/
S01.b ----- - /'.# /'
",
...
/'
...
./
~\
, ATTACHMENT 3
INVOICE t
F.B.NO, 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30'
L",- /J. '(4f.A :
? 4-fc,-z.e. ~.?I-_
t'.1~ J.&tz.l!~
~p VoVt.>F=- l/ALU.
l.. Lor ~fU=.A. - ~~, f"
I'V'Ft:>U\Jtf "forJl,.l.. - S\\t;.,<"1't
'7- 'f l-\~tQ./t.f-" 14. f7 '7..
\
>\ $f.!' 16m; Ii.
U\\~ .--!L>>
I
Lot 13. Block 2. TITUS 2ND ADDITION
...
The onfy eMemenhl shown ore 1i'om ploI, 01 record or inlorrnulion
ptovided by client. ~-
We hereby certify thot this is CI true and correct r~f'f!!enlotion of
o survf\'Y 0' the boundaries 0' the oboyft descrihed land Ofu1 Ihe
location of aI buiadinqa and visibte encroochnMW'lls. if ony, 'rom or on
said kind.
f2c.v.~ \I-Oz, (. . )~.; 0 Ij ( J ()
!(E-J.l. 3-02. (~p.:xl/~Iqned YO..-
~. 1'2--<;-01 ~~l Chm.. r. "n<!. SURVEY
~V\"'~O ~ I'. \~ Groqorr R. Pr.
Sur",wyed bv ."r thi!'t~f'tuy of
.1ulv
I<l-3J
Location VIa)
'_-:or _iesener Variance
1.~~..~Si'te .~
J:
i~
5
u
,f
"'.
~
"
MIl
\
~
'\
I
~
N
t\
400
I
o
400 Feet
I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
VARIANCE APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST
I.
gfIZ/()Z-
81 r-VDL- ~~
OPEN FILE- Date Received:
~Assign file number
!1J--open and label file folder
~ Create file directory under variances
II.
CHECK APPLICATION FOR COMPLETENESS
$//.31::2- ~~
D Completed application, including the appropriate signatures
~Filing Fee._ . (\./ l ,
~I D V~~"1."J6 ~AL1tJ-(~~X~~
'" ~ecessary attachments (survey, house plans, contours, etc')9"-1t9
~ List and labels of property owners within 350' (verify 2~M.
radius)
~ D Written description of specific variances requested
D Are all the requested variances included?
III. WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS:
/
~
~
A. Incomplete application (I:\template\variance\incomplt.doc)
Notify applicant by mail of incomplete application and list
necessary submittals in order to make application complete
B. Complete Application (I:\template\variance\complete.doc)
~.IC{
LAL
Notify applicant by mail that application is complete. Letter
includes:
~ Tentative meeting date, time and location
~ Applicant is expected to attend meeting
~ Extension of 60 day action date to 120 days
~.&,~
c..J<:-
I:\deptwork\blankfrm\varcheck.doc
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
VARIANCE APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST
r!~~
IV. PREPARE REFERRALS (I:\template\variance\referral.doc)
/
~ Send referral notice of application to list of agencies and
departments.
~. Include DNR if located in a Shoreland or Flood Plain District
o Include County Highway Dept. if adjacent to a County Road
o Include other agencies as appropriate
V. PREPARE HEARING NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION
/ (I :\template\variance\hearnote.doc)
13' Notice includes:
~ Correct meeting date
~ Legal description of property
~ Property Address
~ ~ Description of variance requests
13'
VI.
o
D
o
D
Send notice to Prior Lake American by 12:00 NOON on
Wednesday 3 weeks prior to meeting date
PREPARE HEARING NOTICE FOR MAILING
(I :\template\variance\mail note .doc)
Notice includes:
~ Correct meeting date
~ Legal description of property
~ Property Address
~ Description of variance requests
Verify map and radius again!
Label or type envelopes
Mail notices at least 10 days before hearing date
Notice must be mailed to:
~ Property Owner's List
~ Applicant
I:\deptwork\blankfrm\varcheck.doc
q .)-f-
~
q IJ+-
UL
2
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
VARIANCE APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST
~ Property Owner (if other than applicant)
~ DNR (Shoreland or Flood Plain applications)
VII. PREPARE PLANNING REPORT
o
o
D
o
o
o
D
D
o
A. Report includes: (I:\template\variance\varrpt.doc)
Relevant Facts (including any previous actions or variances)
Suggested Findings
Staff Recommendation (including any conditions)
Resolution for Planning Commission adoption ( see
I:\template\variance\appres.doc or I:\template\variance\denyres.doc)
Location Map
Survey/Site Plan
Copy of hearing notice and/or application
Other Exhibits
B. Submit report to supervisor by Tuesday before
hearing date
C. Mail a copy of the staff report and agenda to the
applicant (and to the property owner, if different than
the applicant)
The cover letter should include the meeting date, time and
location, and the fact that the applicant is expected to be present.
VIII. FOLLOWING PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION
A. If APPROVED:
D Prepare Assent Form (I:\template\variance\assent.doc)
D Resolution signed by Planning Commission Chair
o Resolution signed by Planning Director
I:\deptwork\blankfrm\varcheck.doc
3
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
VARIANCE APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST
o
Signed and certified resolution and assent form sent to applicant
for recording (see I:\template\variance\truecopy.doc for certification form)
o
Applicant returns recorded copy of resolution and assent form or
other proof of recording
B. If DENIED:
o Resolution signed by Planning Commission Chair
o Resolution signed by Planning Director
C. In SHORELAND or FLOOD PLAIN DISTRICT:
o Send copy of resolution to DNR within 10 days of Planning
Commission decision
IX. CLOSE FILE
D Add header to file folder
o Signed and recorded copy of resolution
o Signed and recorded copy of assent form
D Planning Commission Minutes
D Enter in Property Management
I:\deptwork\blankfrm\varcheck.doc
4
APPLICA'l'IO~S
&
APPLICA'l'IO~
~A' l'HRIALS
-
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
Planning Case File No.
Property Identification No.
6J - c; 7
City of Prior Lake ,! "-~i d I 2 am
ZONING/LAND USE APPLICATION' ;
~ I
i;
, ,
IUV
Type of Application
o Amendment to Zoning Map
o Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Text
o Amendment to Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
o Conditional Use Permit
[8] Variance
o Planned Unit Development
o Senior Care Overlay District
o Home Occupation
o Amendment or Modification to approved CUP or PUD
o Other
Brief description of proposed project
(Please describe the proposed amendment, project, or variance
request. Attach additional sheets if necessary).
I
I
1
~~V~J~~
Applicant:
Address:
Telephone:
IV A-~ /'T
~6 '7 Gf
L-. 1-/ € s E /)leA
S () /Y .5 E r C-7.
(home) q~-?r'-S~"
Property Owners (if different than applicant):
Address:
Telephone: (home)
Type of Ownership: 0 Fee
(work) q5";>-e,fcf'J>. ~ 1/7 ~
(fax)
(work)
o Contract for Deed
(fax)
o Purchase Agreement
Legal Description of Property (Attach additional sheets if nece~ary)~ A n
/....tJT 11 IlI-PC^ , Tf7C/J ~ rv
To the best of my knowledge the information provided in this application and other material submitted is correct. In
addition, I have read the relevant sections of the Prior Lake Ordinance and procedural guidelines, and understand that
applications will not be processed until deemed complete by the Planning Director or assignee.
..
Date
R((~fO/
Date · ,
ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION
(Required for PUD, CUP and SC Overlay District applications)
Will the developers request financial assistance from the City?
o Yes
o No
If yes, please describe the amount and type of assistance requested (attach additional pages if necessary).
Will anyone other than the applicant be involved in the ownership, development & management of this project?
DYes (If yes, please attach a list ofthe names and the role of all persons involved in the project.) 0 No
I :\handouls\200 I handouts\zoning\zoning app,doc
r;
SE.P , 9 -\ \1
, 1'1
,vJ
_,~--JL/'
September 16, 2002
,Jui
City of Prior Lake
Planning Department
Prior Lake, MN
Cindy
Dear Cindy:
I desire a variance on Lot 13, Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition, so
that a home can be bllilt on this lot. It is my understanding that a varciance
is needed because the proposed home would be too close to the highwater line.
The prop?sed home will have ~t's lowest floor three feet above this ordinary
high water line.
If any other variances are needed, I would like them to be taken care
of at this time.
~t?~
Mark L. Liesener
-4"-".."--'-'"...._'~_._.."'".._........-........_-~~----'t~--_..~-~~..--~.
FROM : BLe
PHONE NO. : 6128882475
BLOOMINGTON LUTHERAN CHURCH &
LIVING HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH.
9350 PORTLAND AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420
t'AX
TO:'~-~..~
. t'J" . .
, ~
Fax # q') J. - l.frt 7 - 1.(:J'f r
Phone #
Remarks: OUrgent
~For your review
Message:
. pate:
Sep. 16 2002 09:00AM Pi
# of paKes including cover sheet
. From:'~d~
rax#
Phone #
952=888-7068
952-888-2475
II..
,1,1,_,_,1,",--
.
o Reply ASAP
D Please comment
FROM
ELC
PHONE NO.
6128882475
Sep. 16 2002 09:01AM P2
septexnher 16. 2002
City of Fr~or Lake
planning Department
Pr ior Lakl:. MN
cindy
Dear Cindy:
I desire a variance on LOt 13. Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition, so
that a home can b€ b~ilt on this lot. It is my understanding t~at a var~ance
is needed because the proposed home would be too close to the highwater line.
The proposed home will have ~t's lowest floor three feet above this ordinary
h~gh water line.
If any other variances are needed. I would like them to be taken care.
of at this time.
~~~
Mark L. Liesener
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 EAGLE CREEK AVE SE
PRIOR LAKE. MN 55372
(952) 447-4230, FAX (952) 447.4245
RECEIPT # 41658
DATE:_~ 1/7--ID 2-
Received of v'Vv~M.. [.... (~\.e-~ AEV'-
the sum of (t~J-.{i ~ [:J{MY~A~v) Ft ~( L.( 't ~.yOQ
dollars
for the purpose of )
L {i .A. AY.I.'/v\{'-p _
$ !S-D~
. .
?4r.~ h-/ ~LA:'l
r !Jr,"'
Invoice #
~~~-
Receipf"CIerk for the City of Prior Lake
Approved Plans
.
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
\
....
....
,
,.f!l
, '"
'\.
~:
'\. '\. ,
.,~
1/1
S01.b
o Denot.. Iron Morunent
o Denote. Wood Hub Set
for .xcavatlon only
xOOO.O Denote. Exl.tlnv Elevation
@ Denot.. Propoeed Elevation
. Denot.. Surface Drainage
NOTE: Proposed V-adel are subject
to re~. of .0R te.ts.
Propo.ed bulIdIn9 information
mtJIIt be checked with approved
bul1d1ng plan and dev l."ent or
gradln9 plan before excavation
and construction.
Property is located in Zone X per B oQ I
Connunity Panel No. 270432 0002 C ' ". Propo.ed Top of Bock
Da1;ed Nov.elllber 19, 1997. &ot-.l., Propoled Goraoe. Floor
50S.' Pr~r lowe.t Floor
Type of BuIIdlnv
$ O:vesf .flwoanoJ
~~~
r'~'
I '
I
.~ I
I I ·
~~ , ~I I
f .'I if;
~, ! {'
1 tJ~ ~ ~l.,F;\lA-rlotJ 0 F
lU'A () (J v fiJZ-
~ ,r' ~ 'I, ( n
~~1 II
~1j:lt '\
. N Ii
,r/" '\
I
rIP'" 1:\
, , /'''' .",'" / \
110 :~~~ / ~~\\
r-'~ / (S
f-- - S'->) I i.
" Vlnt.,/iY' P/<AINA<<. /fA'7/!l1on-.<:; . \
. / _. --- I "\ \
) )
got & 1 /
/'
Established in 1962
LOT SURVEYS COMP AMY, I"C.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7801 73rd Annue North 812-&80-3093
raz No. G80-3G22
YlnneapoUa. Ylnne.ota GG428
lturutYllrJ attrtifirutt
MIKE .HAYFs '
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
rec~nded by builder.
Property located in Section
23, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota
No flood elevation available from
City engineering or watershed dept.
~
-~
JAti~~oH
II ( ftlX1'\ \L.L. " \~JI<
1~~__u"_n.r!'
..__.____._._1.__ --;--- I
~\L
~\L.)
qfi:i
^v~
~'
t;., A..I?
frJ' - -\ \Q~.6ofV - -
"f9
~
'> I /-.~
~ ;.;'-'\ I' l'.. .~
~ I:
"3 " ~
~ Q-
.A. 0
~ ~:
't-- \.
~~ ~
Hn_ '~~I 'r;~ O_?\. '3c>'o"
,:,'" 'i ~.. . _U
qf' () 0. :':)(~ . , II l.J:t
(\J 3"2.0
f .]) ..,Pf2t?Fb5ED
1 I ~ . ;, GZe.$1 O~Hc.e
I f'\1'~'lo.8Z'c!
.S) --Ill!
~ . ,jl~~ <f!D
~ .#' of' r#l~' ~
",
~
l
\
\
\
\
\
fqffJ}
\
I
J
...
,/
I
~: // /
~~YJ /'
/" /,\'1 ~ /'
// /' ,..,../
/"
1
f
\
/'
INVOICE --NO. ~; ~
F.B.NO. 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30 I
r"-.
~ " J ~
Lt>1" /J..~A:
~+~-z.f> ~,tl..
t':1~ J-c;. __e~
-
~p VOVf"F- tJA\...LI.
L.. LQr I\~Jc · ~~" 1'""
\-t~U;V&ef' 1'~ · ~\\~~f't
'l"'.e:f AAfo~.e 14.f;7~~
\
......
".~.- --_...~,-~-_..-
~ ,_. I c. ;'1 ',\n ' , ,
: ',(.r. '. '00' i..i \,
.._._.____'. ....___ '-"--" 'i,
,i. v( .... ., t III
l\~;
I
i j,
! j
j~
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
,,/
,..,..
\
....
/'
....
The only easements shown ore from plots of record or information
provided by client. ;-
We hereby certify thot this is 0 true and correct representation of
o survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the
location of 01 buildin9s and visible encroachments, it any. from or on
said land.
Surveyed by us this 9th day of Julv
f4v,~ \I~D$ ()f)? 1- /\
t<E--J.1-3-oZ (~~~'cptdL0--~ .'
~. \'2,....f;..ol ~tAJii Chor1e8 r. Andereon. NIm. Reg. No.2t75J or
'et'^~O ~ \'. \~ Gr'9O"Y R. Praeeh, MInn Reg No. 24992
,/
19~
o Denotee Iron Morunent
o Denote. Wood Hub Set
for excavation only
)(000.0 Denotee Exl.tlno Elevation
@ Denote. Propand Elevotlon
- Denote. Surface Drainage
NOTE: Propoeed Vades (l"e subject
to relUlte of .on teets.
Propo.ed buIIc:tIn9 Information
must be checked with approved
building plan and dev. \. " . nt or
orodln9 plan before excavation
, and construction.
Property is located - i n Zone X per 8 oC. ,
COIIIlUnity Panel 110. 270432 0002 C' '1', Proposed Top of Block
&o~.b Propo.ed GarCJ9l1, Floor
50,>.' Pr~.r lowllut Floor
Type of 8uIdInv
5 ~tSE .~oano0
~~~
r'~'
II :
.J ,
I I '
~f '1,/ /
~ IL~~ I
~ J.' If! I
'\ 7 ~ I
, 1 fj tJ~~ te-w;vA'rtotJ ,,~
/ ~AO DVfiJZ-
'\5.0 . t r I - - W1,.~ b&'t.{1"O(A~
~O II r ..f. (tfPlMfl' t\ll.tI WM't!.f-
--.r ' ;a. ./.11 / I .. '-.
~ ' , I !\
JIS.~' }, \ IN
~~a1;i>ct\ \
IV "
.r/" '\
~'" . j \'1
/ I
I "'~
~- / (5
f-- -J S'--) i
IIrttlfY' 1l1/lAINA~ ~~I1t:Hr~/~, __ ,\
/ .. \
I .fI/!J~ PPI-J' ' J
Established in 1962
'-
..,
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7801 73rd Annue North 812-&80-3093
raz No. 680-3622
IUnne.poUs, Minnesota 66428
l;urUtynrs Clttrtifirutt
,
':..~ 'HAYEs ..,
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
rec~nded by builder.
Property located in Section
23, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota
No flood elevation available from
City engineering or watershed dept.
Da1;ed Nov.ellber 19, 1997.
.J~~~
JA{;~~OH
.1 ( ~\L.L. A'tJ...;.
'1'l''' . #.
-.. .:;-.-..-..----.--'--.----..-~;;...;::;;;;. -1 .---.-....----.-'..
~\L
1p.\ l..) ~v ,.,)<
".
~
ftJ' -- -\ \o-z,,40 - -
tJf19
qfv;.
~
'> /II~-
: (1' t'..'
I I ~
I ~ ~_
N ;/
~ J: I /' A ~:
~ J \ '
,,~~~ ~
A\' , 1"' ouv.
'IY ..~ a '" 32-'0"
f t
J# I ~
~ .\1.&4--~
.., rj'l':l..
71 " ~
}
,
,
\
,
\
tJf1'!J
-::s
~
-r.
, ,.
^
" '"
\..
~:
\.. \.. "
~
:\'
"
~
'3c>'0"
.,~
7"(}
'D*
Pr<bfb5€'D
, Rei';; I DEHc..E
8zd'
<b!~
~~.~
'-.. ....'i
\
I
}
,.
,/
./
/"
/'
/'
1
( ./
./
\ ./
" ./
\ ,
S01.b ./
/'
INVOICE -NO, ~: ';;
F.B.NO. 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30 I
. _ ~ ).1-
LO'T" ~ '(Z1;.A :
3 4"'1.6 ~,t:t
t':J~ A~ ,. e 1J
~o VoVf.1~ UAU/.
L Lor "'~~ · ~2b~1''f''
\.V~C>U)Jqe.""~ · c;,\\~~ft
~.. tf ~~ ~ 14.f;J"l"
\
........
-_.~---~~--~_.. .....
---"":".'.:' ,'-- ~ i'l ...-, r, r'.-.....
, ./ ':,. I r:-! , ! \ \, " ,,",
\C:, ; l~__ Ll \\'~J ."
'-.... - ~--- i
,
, "/
, ..
; ;
59 I'.
i
i i
I
H.~
, ' ',\ .1
d'U!
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
,
The only easements shown ore from plots of record or informution
provided by client. ; -
We hereby certify thot this is a true and correct representation of
a survey of the boundorles of the above described land and the
location of aM buildings and visible ftncroachments. if any. from or on
said land.
Surveyed by us this-ith duy of JulV 19~
1/
f4\!. ~ \I ~",2- /j f) ? / /
t<~.1. 3.oZ, (~~~1cJned '-.:..~~ - "
~,\~-"..ol ~~ Cha1es r. Anderson, MInn. Reg. No,2175J or .
~~O ~..( t. \', \~ Gr~y R. Praeeh, t.Alnn Reg No. 24992
~~
~N%:~
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
CASE FILE#:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
5A
CONSIDER VARIANCES FROM THE ZONING
ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
4525 JACKSON TRAIL
CYNTHIA KIRCHOFF, AICP, PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
X YES NO
OCTOBER 14, 2002
02-097
Mark Liesener is requesting variances from zoning ordinance provisions to permit the
construction of a single family dwelling on property zoned R-S (Rural Subdivision
Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay District) and located at 4525 Jackson Trail
(Lot 13, Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition). The property is guided Urban Low/Medium
Density Residential in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan.
The site is a vacant, riparian lot, as it abuts an unnamed tributary watercourse
connected with Pike Lake. Trees are scattered throughout the property. Municipal
water and sewer is currently unavailable to the site.
The applicant requests the following variances:
1. A 52,492 square foot variance from the required minimum 2 acre lot area in
the R-S zoning district to allow a 34,628 square foot lot. (Zoning Ordinance
Section 1102.306 (3) Dimensional Standards.)
2. A 76 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an unnamed
tributary watercourse. (Zoning Ordinance Section 1104.301 (3) Setback
Requirements.)
BACKGROUND:
The subject property was platted as part of Titus 2nd Addition in 1974. The lot is
approximately 160 feet at the minimum required 25 foot front yard setback and 34,628
square feet in area. Although the property is a lot of record, it does not comply with
the minimum lot area standard set forth for lots zoned R-S. An unnamed tributary
1:\02fi1es\02variances\02-097\pc report. doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Planning Report - Liesener Variances
October 14, 2002
Page 2
watercourse extends along the east boundary of the lot, which requires a 100 foot
setback from the ordinary high water level (OHW).
In 1999, the
applicant was
granted a lot area
and 70 foot variance
from the minimum
100 foot setback for
the construction of a
single family
dwelling. In 2000,
the applicant was
granted a one year
extension until
September 2001 to
utilize the variances.
The zoning
ordinance states "all
variances shall be
revoked and canceled if one year has elapsed from the date of the adoption of the resolution
granting the variance and the holder of the variance has failed to make substantial use of the
premises according to the provisions of the variance." A building permit was not issued
for the subject site, so the variance process must commence once again.
DISCUSSION:
The applicant would like to construct a single family dwelling on property zoned R-S
(Rural Subdivision Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay District). Although the lot
was platted for residential use, it does not comply with the minimum 2 acre
dimensional standard for lots in the R-S zoning district, and a variance must be granted
to allow a single family dwelling (a reasonable use) to be built. The zoning ordinance
does not allow the development of nonconforming lots in unsewered areas without a
variance. The subject lot is 34,628 square feet.
Furthermore, the subject property was not platted to accommodate a 100 foot setback
from the ordinary high water level (OHW) of the unnamed tributory watercourse that
flows along the east property line. Thus, the buildable area (area remaining after
minimum setbacks have been met) results in a narrow strip that ranges from
approximately 15 to 40 feet in width and approximately 200 feet in depth. In order to
construct a reasonable use, a variance would need to be granted from the minimum
setback. The proposed dwelling is shown 24 feet from the OHW.
I: \02fi\es\02variances\02-097\pc report. doc
Planning Report - Liesener Variances
October 14, 2002
Page 3
Two sets of building plans were submitted, neither of which are consistent with the
building footprint on the survey, so this report is based upon what was presented on
the survey only. Dwelling "A" is 80 feet in width by 38 feet in depth and is a two-
story design. Dwelling "B" is also a two-story design with a side loading tuck under
garage but is only 53 feet in width by 22 feet in depth. The proposed dwelling shown
on the survey is 82 feet (but scales as 84 feet) in width by 44 feet in depth.
The proposed dwelling shown on the survey complies with other applicable bulk
standards, as shown in the following table.
TABLE 1
COMPARISON OF PROPOSAL TO ORDINANCE BULK STANDARDS
Setbacks Ordinance Requirement Proposal
Front 25 feet 73 feet
Side 10 feet 15 feet
Rear 25 feet 103 feet
Tributary Watercourse 100 feet 24 feet
I Impervious Surface Coverage
30 percent
14.8 percent
Minnesota DNR Comments
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) was noticed about the variance requests
and recommends that the house pad be reoriented to increase the setback from the
watercourse (see Attachment 7). If this relocation is not feasible, the DNR expects that
at least the 30 foot setback, approved in 1999, would be met.
The watercourse does not have a federally designated floodplain associated with it.
Section 1104.308(3) of the zoning ordinance requires the lowest floor of a structure to
be at least three feet above the flood of record, three feet above the OHW, or by
conducting a technical elevation to establish a flood protection elevation. Engineering
along with the Prior Lake - Spring Lake Watershed District has confirmed that the 100
year flood elevation is 802.9 feet, thus the minimum floor elevation is required to be
805.9 feet. The survey indicates that the lowest floor is proposed to be 805.9 feet.
Individual Sewae:e Treatment Svstem nSTS)
Since municipal water and sewer is unavailable, the property will be required to have a
private well and septic system. A permit for the Individual Sewage Treatment System
(ISTS) must be obtained from Scott County. For this type of structure, a 75 foot
setback is required from the OWH of the unnamed tributary watercourse. This
information has not been provided as part of this application, but is required to be
provided on the survey submitted with the building permit application.
1:\02files\02variances\02-097\pc report. doc
Planning Report - Liesener Variances
October 14,2002
Page 4
VARIANCE HARDSHIP FINDINGS
Section 1108.400 states that the Board of Adjustment may grant a Variance from the
strict application of the provisions of the zoning ordinance, provided that:
1. Where by reason of narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a lot, or where by
reason of exceptional topographical or water conditions or other extraordinary
and exceptional conditions of such lot, the strict application of the terms of
this Ordinance would result in peculiar and practical difficulties or exceptional
or undue hardship upon the owner of such lot in developing or using such lot
in a manner customary and legally permissible within the Use District in
which said lot is located.
The property is a legal, nonconforming lot because although it was legally platted
in 1974, the lot does not meet the current minimum lot area required for properties
zoned R-S. Thus, the strict application of the ordinance would result in an undue
hardship upon the property owner because without the variance the property
cannot be developed. An undue hardship means "a condition resulting when
reasonable use cannot be made of a property if used under conditions allowed by
the official control, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to
his property not created by the landowner, and, if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the
terms of the ordinance."
The lot complies with minimum lot width required of properties in the R-S zoning
district, but a 100 foot setback limits the buildable width to a range of 15 to 25 feet,
so strict interpretation of the ordinance would result in difficulties in using the lot
for a single family dwelling. However, 90 percent of the proposed dwelling is
located within the required setback. In 1999, the applicant was granted a 70 foot
variance from the 100 foot setback to maintain a 30 foot setback. The current
proposal indicates the dwelling is 24 feet from the 802.9 elevation
2. Conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to the
property or immediately adjoining property, and do not apply, generally, to
other land or structures in the Use District in which the land is located.
The property is a substandard lot of record and is unbuildable without relief from
minimum dimensional requirements. Titus 1st and 2nd Additions are the only plats
zoned R-S, which intends to provide areas for large lot development outside the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). This development does not have access
to municipal sewer and water, so the lots are required to be larger to accommodate
pnvate systems.
1:\02fi1es\02variances\02-097\pc report.doc
Planning Report - Liesener Variances
October 14, 2002
Page 5
The 100 foot setback from the tributary watercourse is a unique condition applying
to a few properties within the vicinity. However, a reasonable use, which is
considered a single family dwelling with a two stall garage, can be constructed on
the property without the large setback variance.
3. The granting of the proposed Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the owner.
The lot area variance is essential for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right, because the applicant/property owner did not plat the property, or
this particular element of the site was not under the control of the applicant.
A single family dwelling with a detached garage is considered a reasonable use for
this property. A reasonable use cannot be constructed within the buildable area, so
a variance from the minimum tributary watercourse setback is necessary for the
enjoyment of the property. Staff supports a 40 foot variance versus the 76 foot
variance requested by the applicant.
4. The granting of the proposed Variance will not impair an adequate supply of
light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in
the public streets, increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety.
The granting of the lot area and setback variances should not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent properties, increase congestion or endanger
public safety, provided conditions of approval are met.
5. The granting of the Variance will not unreasonably impact on the character
and development of the neighborhood, unreasonably diminish or impair
established property values in the surrounding area, or in any other way
impair the health, safety, and comfort of the area.
Relief from the R-S zoning district minimal dimensional standards to allow a
reasonable use to be constructed on the property will not unreasonably impact the
neighborhood, as the property was platted for residential use and three other
homes were constructed within this plat.
The granting of the setback variance will impact the character and development of
this area. Permitting the construction of the proposed structure 24 feet from the
OHW of the watercourse will affect the perceived health, safety, and comfort of
the immediate area. Although a setback variance is warranted to allow a dwelling
to be constructed, staff supports the 40 foot variance suggested by the DNR. This
1:\02fi1es\02variances\02-097\pc report. doc
Planning Report - Liesener Variances
October 14, 2002
Page 6
variance would provide a minimum of 50 feet of buildable width at the lot's
narrowest pOlllt.
6. The granting of the proposed Variance will not be contrary to the intent of
this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
The granting of the lot area variance will not be contrary to the intent of the R-S
zoning district, which states that its purpose is to provide suitable areas for large lot
development outside of the MUSA.
The shoreland ordinance intends to "preserve and enhance the quality of surface
waters, preserve the economic and natural environmental values of shoreland, and
provide for the wise utilization of waters and related land resources." The
requested 76 foot variance from the required setback appears to be inconsistent
with the intent of the shoreland ordinance. However, a 40 foot variance would
still allow a reasonable use to be constructed and would provide some protection
for the watercourse.
7. The granting of the Variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable undue hardship or
difficulty.
A demonstrable hardship is present to warrant variances from minimum lot area,
because without relief the property would remain unbuildable.
The requested 76 foot setback variance could be reduced, so the variance serves as a
convenience to the applicant. At the very least the dwelling should maintain the 30
foot setback approved in 1999. The house footprint could be shifted or reoriented
as recommended by the DNR to significantly increase the setback from the
watercourse.
8. The hardship results from the application of the provisions of this Ordinance
to the affected property and does not result from actions of the owners of the
property.
The subject site is only 34,628 square feet in area. The zoning ordinance requires
lots within the R-S zoning district to be 2 acres in area, so this lot is
nonconforming. The applicant did not create the nonconforming lot, so the
hardship results from the application of the provisions of the zoning ordinance and
not from action of the applicant.
Although the strict application of the ordinance creates an undue hardship, the
proposed 24 foot setback is a direct result of the actions of the applicant. A
1:\02files\02variances\02-097\pc report.doc
Planning Report - Liesener Variances
October 14, 2002
Page 7
reasonable use can be constructed on the property with a 40 foot variance (60 foot
setback).
9. Increased development or construction costs or economic hardship alone shall
not he grounds for granting a Variance.
Although the construction of a dwelling will significantly increased the value of the
property, staff does not believe that this is the sole purpose of the application. The
property was platted for such a use in 1974.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant is requesting variances to construct a single family dwelling on property
zoned R-S and SD. The subject lot does not comply with the minimum lot area
established by the zoning ordinance, because it was platted in 1974, prior to the current
ordinance being adopted in 1999. Moreover, the proposed dwelling does not comply
with the minimum setback from the tributary watercourse that extends along the east
portion of the site.
Since the property is a legal, nonconforming lot of record and the required watercourse
setback significantly constrains the site's buildable area, variances are warranted. The
property owner cannot construct a reasonable use without relief from the zoning
ordinance. However, the 76 foot setback variance seems excessive considering a
dwelling can be constructed on the property while maintaining a greater setback.
Staff supports the lot area variance, but not the 76 foot tributary watercourse variance.
A reduced 40 foot setback variance is appropriate, because it provides more protection
to the tributary. This is also consistent with the variance approved by the Planning
Commission in 1999.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested 52,492 square foot variance from
minimum lot area and a 40 foot tributary watercourse setback, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption.
Proof of recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building
permIt.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state
agency regulations
1: \02files\02variances\02-097\pc report. doc
Planning Report - Liesener Variances
October 14, 2002
Page 8
3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits for an Individual Sewage
Treatment System (ISTS) from Scott County.
4. The ISTS shall comply with applicable regulations.
5. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted with the building permit
application.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the variances requested by the applicant, or approve any variances the
Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of
demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria.
ACTIONS REOUIRED:
The staff recommends approval of this request in part, and denial in part. This
requires the following motions:
1. A Motion and second adopting Resolution 02-014PC approving a 52,492 square
foot variance from the 2 acre minimum lot area in the R-S zoning district and a 40
foot variance from the 100 foot setback from the unnamed tributary watercourse.
2. A Motion and second adopting Resolution 02-015PC denying a 76 foot variance
from the 100 foot setback from the unnamed tributary watercourse.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location map
2. Applicant's letter
3. Survey
4. Dwelling plans
5. Existing buildable area
6. Buildable area with 40 foot variance
7. Letter from DNR dated September 26,2002
8. Applicable regulations
1:\02files\02variances\02-097\pc report. doc
_ocation VIa)
for _iesener Variance
ATTACHMENT 1
I Subiect Site
~.~.
~
j~\ \ /..__ r
~ \ ~~
- ~
..------..--
---------------
/\/\
\
(/
,
~~
JACKSON TRL NE
\
N
A
400
I
o
400 Feet
I
r;.
----= ,_ '-' ATTACHMENT 2
~ "'~'"'"t ! -.'
SEP I 9 3l)2 \ ; i:
') }\
.;;/
--.-----. ~-----~
September 16, 2002
'J \-"
,,--.,--.'--~>' ,,'
City of Prior Lake
Planning Department
Prior Lake, MN
Cindy
Dear Cindy:
I desire a variance on Lot 13, Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition, so
that a home can be built on this lot. It is my understanding that a var~ance
is needed because the proposed home would be too close to the highwater line.
The propC?sed home will have ~t's lowest floor three feet above this ordinary
high water line.
If any other variances are needed, I would like them to be taken care
of at this time.
~t?~
Mark L. Liesener
APPLICANT'S LETTER
Established In 1962
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7801 7Srd A...nu. Norlb
...
x(}OO(} Denote. bl.tln9 Elevation
~ Denot.. PrOPO..d Elevation
Denot.. Surloc. Drolnog.
NOTE: Propo.ed grade. ore eub jeet
10 reNI. of .0A leah.
Propoled bufldl"9 Inlormotlon
""",t b. checlted with opproved
buIldl"9 pion ond de> .'., . 1 or
9'odln9 plan belor. e.eovotlon
ond construction.
Property is located in Zone X per 809 I P ad T I IlIo k
COllIIltInity Panel No. 270432 0002 C . ropol op 0 c
Dated Nov.etd>er 19, 1997. 601>.1, Propol.d GorOCj. Floor
~OS,'}_propol~d Lowelt Floor
TY~OI IIuIIdInv
5 ~t.SE fM.Joono..J
i'urUtyors Clttrtifirnlt
IUnDe.polls. Ulnnesola 1111428
812-1180-S0DS
Fa" No. 1160-31122
JAu~t7OH
~~" (f'tv(t\I~
~~J'
~ tr '+ '.. .
<\' Ii'
~11~ I t
"L I;~ Q
,<'!l I r.-
qy ~, .~.
: ~.tJt~1"""
.p-. ,. <8J>' J)
~ 0:> 3'2.'0'1 :t
f ':t ; P~D
I I ~ . . f<'~$1 DENc.E
I I_I'
, "I'.f.'h.. 8Zo
r~:~ ~.. .l. @)
i \Y' r(/l~'.
'HIKE HAm
Property located in Section
23, Township 115. Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota
~~
,
, \.
.fJ~
10
"'~
r:~~
1-- -rs--: l I
' "flUT}' Pfi!lf/lfo//14f;
,qf1Q':-
~~~
/",~.
. '-;;7-AO- ~!;Ij\
g /rf' II LM I>~A:
..,,~ . l~'f' / HI","l.fl> ~.?I-.
.f~ / '! l~~ t:',1~ A.,,:;,.e'"
" '7 /f'r
. ~~f rJol'E<: lfL.E:"A"f"10N "F
l; / 11.....60 DVI1p-
:l" ~. / / CtJL"gf"--r _ &03.3
" ~~ /
"'l--~. , /__1-
: 'Is.olli /:' ,(. - (~~or;:f~I~A1~f-
_G ~ 1(/ / I ~
t .' ,I I [i
"[II' \ ~
~o~_~ ~ /
U't -,
,,~r, 'I!
# /,\
/ \1
,tJfj
NDTE:Proposed elevations shown
recomIended by builder.
No flood elevation available from
City en9ineering or watershed dept.
1lZA\ L
A\V,-.J< '\fAIL.) -<.,),.)<
~. ~.
qfi':'
t
<@?
S::>' 0 ,t
! (S
~~I1I!N'r:.- ,
/<-
1
\
\
\
\
...
/'~-
.' /"ry ...-
./'- ,?f)' ./
"", ~ /'
I
,I ,./'
I I ~ ,.'"
\~. ,-
I01.b ------. / '" ,-
......
--
The only easements shown ore from plots of record or in'ormation
provided by client. .. -
We hereby certify thot this is 0 true O'ld correct refl"esentotion of
o luryey of the boundaries 0' the above described land ond Ihe
Iocotion 01 .. I>ulklirnJI and villble oner.., I, if ony. 'rom or on
laid Iond.
SurveYld by III Ihil~d(JY or ,Julv
/'
..-
,/
'"
, ATTACHMENT 3
INVOICE ~
F.B.NO. 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30'
o Denot.1 Iron Monument
o Denote. Wood Hub Set
for excovotlon only
~D V~tz. w..1...V.
L L&r ,...~~ - ~<Jo;>, .-
I-\~C>~t.f 'f0fl).L - <:,,,c;,"'P1'I
FJ- 'f AAfotQ/~.. 14.l?'7"
\
1\ i II L
Iii
U\\:
I
stPI6.
I~'
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
1', '\ .
f2c.",~ \I-o~ ()( 0 / ( ~ n
~\N,1.3-oZ (~~I),lgned Yo--~ SURVEY
f!-V". I-z.~~-Ol ~~ ChmtI. r. And<
~V\~O ~ I', \~ Gr89DfY R. Prn
HIJ'
ATTACHMENT 4
DWELLING PLANS
-IC/; Ml~ /ilt\'0c;, --FAX' ~ ~5~ '-+70 050~.
- F ~OM' DHelS ~~ ~ J-.[lJNA~ -q5d.. ~<;()- oJ-IU
-- A'O;\! lY\" ) OLIN ~ 17, ~~. ) rn @ rno \'{l rn Jl
.....~I
~).JO'2 6(f- ~,
~ J
> eNTity
~i~~
[Li v'
I I"
I I
_:l'2-i---.f'2 .. .. -,&
I
rn/~,I'- ~ -
\ I
t;P!J~V/~n?-~;fdd.;/~;_~,f'~~ ~':;'~0 ) fJ~eOse cw,
l'0, r fur'--fltt cUdtf U'h It'kj (1JCYY1 rY':+ pzr-tcd-::f7 i
~ L:? W-I7J5mS ) ll::a- lfflrz;OYVl (,ru;/e rJ) t SJri/ fI /.tJ.ur~
0f'-Id./ (3 w,1/ l?{.. -:) 1 will ktiiiJlJJYl It -feW fJepS 'k @' 1:.'Itt: '~
r OlJIl") - J11t fLI'I1'/~ rwrr CM l1-11 IrTu (OlJYYI aJ s.o bt ct61.Jr, ~ J--.d..~ 9tR.
d/u$ltn d ~61;.if~~'e.{. " . ~, 'd ~.f'TrsJY:-f1vL ,rtA "J A f
r~? Un. S1lr IYlS") , mud rwm ,,!jhf II\SI 6 tfltl.qt.. Il''()..I\'t~ ~
.._-..-" -- -.....-... -.,;,.. .~~ rl'l ..,......L.l..Ic.rt,;.::lo.......L
'fl.-'
~
-
,-
I
r...D -
:IlI~
-1'---
'"T"
1 '
I I
I .
-..
KliCHe~
,.... ,~I
1..11'
\. ....
I
I
-:.,., ::}L
DINING
12'hllS
I,nun"
'1 i
, 'L-l"
I-H
i 11'--1
~! ~
)--'
-'~''''''
..
.
I
o(tl.;"" ~"'"
UVING
1".\~
...L-.I- !
.-
If\ _____ '-~
. L -.-.-- r COVI!R!:O PORCl'l ;::::J./
..
.. 06't
612 724 2938
P.01
-\
-:1t.{t
"-..
",
i
I
an
--"l
I
qt. v.........
i/
. 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ ~
I
I
FA,.II~V
,,,..,n
.(: ~ c..~ (c~ t<M.~"''-
I
GARAGE
31'10. 21'0
- -, i
..~ I
'.
~ -~~ 1
i ~
- I 1-" ;. I
n 1_..._ l_r,c..1 Ir,o--l
I I
::In'' 11'1. "_
,
-,:.
i
-..
- I
o~,c.
ft."..
I
I:
j
I
;
I
~
\
. .-..-/f'8__
i
i
.~
DWELLING A FLOOR PLANS
, ~,
" ' "O""'t.~"
" ',- ,. h", c.1 ...." . .. ~", ~ ," .:~ -;l. ~ r.
'O'Z" ""-,S 0\.1 \ , ,;3",\1 f'?:'l'
.. ~ \' ,
~,,,,,-,...., "\:~~~d~,..- ;)hZ\t2(~
'~r~ , , .,j : ;r~ ! ~ 'i
~ ~ ~ ~~ I, 'i~! I " '1'11,-4+, 't~f.' 111 il ~~),~
-.3., 1i -\ .'1 \.ij' ,',; Ii I Fj '}!~
T <" ,,- '\,. I I, , --J \ v _ ,
'('01' I'~ ii", \1 =--,"T ~o
',' ,-~., Jllt.'.,";"'.-: ~ ~.;.~,::~ 'fl-I,1 I: I ~ '4 ,-- 4<
. ' ~;\.'\.\.'\.'\.........'\.~ ,~"........'! ! i! f :,!"" I: i; ,. I, .' <'II . I~':l;
. ,I l 0 ' " " "" I -'" '0, ,
9 t I I :,.- ' -:-. .: ';. i I
'0 "~ \l, r! :: Ii! i if' ','I' i i P, '"llr, i rrf ~ I:: t, : r" i, I, ~:, i i j ;,i ~, \ ~ ,'I
.7 "!'--~-II ';111'1' I'!~':' I!,!t 5!ii!~! I ',' "~I)+ ,~;i~!t ~--'-'\.1
r- Q I,; , , i , J il, '11'":' ........ ! ~. lr\l.- N 0
'0 N.. - P J.l".ull~, ;, I I 1.1 ': 1,', ' : .~, i ~ Ii' I u; ~ ~ \; i
~ .. ~ ! l i; : :.Lrr' "~f _,' ~9~'$.'--i--\.i-. I
"~,, --~- :-~ I"~ "T', i .11';,'" T'
I ~-,!,III,', ,I' ,I, , I .t,', ,'" I"l' ;" oi ." ~ I
~ :1' IIII ',II':;lil I'~.~ I, I II','; ,.' ~~ ~,'2 '01.,
~~ L ;':lil:!!I, :'''!:':';;l!~' !:il~";,,:i,I,lli'.1 ~~J ~:i "cfi!~l
, V\ I~ ~ : i"! I "I': 1'1~' N '~'~' "I" I ,; ,0, , '9 1 ~ ',..,
0<> 1&.1\") '- , ", I: ' I, ~';)' I " ' .' cO ~ j '<'Ii
~., ...J_.2 ~ - 'Ill:' , :':; 'I i:::! ~ ,,' '~i I' _ ~.l. ~ I
.1") 2 I ~~ q , 'II' :' ~' I': ~:!", : I t! l~IW I , I ' : III ~ ;;:?"":"'" ~ ",. '" !
la~~ ' ", ".Q 'Ill' It,1 I' ~ 1'1
'O"T \ I I I~ 'I' : ' , , ' , , , II, < _ .,"~....,\ 1 "'!' I i ~ I !
. I ~~ I 'I - \ l-' ! '[ ": III" , I "~ ~ " , .." ~ ' O. \... It 1
\fI I 1Ili= I I '11\.0 ~' , I" " 'I ,;, ': ';'" ~'" ,I' I
1~ ~ 1" ~ :! I ~ : I i ul i ; I ' , '
"~I;L_ - - ~ -- : ..'+1, ,f+l.+,. .. '~'''jj~tl ++141.:-....~ '~I
, , JII j - I ! ! i j1iittf' I ~l ~ I: '_.+ tl +1 ' I ! W- >l. 1111 '0
~ j' tt 1T1lT 'I 'It.~ ~Lttl 11,1' l'q"l, .~:h' ~
<r 1~<--'-, Ili,!I:, :'I::~\,i,! li,:::I' :,I!!~k't " ~1- ~~ ~
, ..a I I II)'; II II' 'I" I '1"1" 1 1~t9, <of...
" . .] '" I ' .' I I'. I, ' ,', 'I!~. "'J:
" 'g ~ ..("" ,,' : ii' I; :',; 'I, ; ~ ; Ii' I : I ~ !"~ ! , ' ~ ..
o . " . ! Ii!: i, i I IIII~ ~ I , ' It ',"! I, ~ I' ' ~
" k '" '- 'j-- : r J;' I ! ! 1'1 , ~. ~ I I I -! !, /- ~
~ ') I . / I! I c' ;. I ! I ; I: / c;
1~ -,I::; I, i: I~ill~~! I I I'~, '"
"", 'l j I, I, , 4, "I, .
.' '0 'I, I ,2~, I I '
~ ~ ~ -( ; i I' I! I .Lj~L" . I I: : 17 ~
",I, ~'J[i I!: i 1,/ N
S l.L .LL-- - Q ~ ' ! -'- -l-' ...;.. rot"
~ ' ~~':~ ,.,-,___.3 _
, ... '-'" Nt; - 0"''' Q"O"]
---------.Q~~ ~.:-: ... - ._--~~...
------,~_... '-." -- -- --- ,- ,---.--. ----..
~-=- ------'-:-j':' . -.- -~;-~:::-"-::~=t.~ .--::--
~
-'-=~_:::..::-g: ... - .- ,
-~--::":~_..:i~~ ',::-==: ~=~ :''': --:-:----
0--'. ---
_____ :_1
" ~ """, '\.
,
;
() I
"
').
I:
. 10
'01.'
.' 1cS:l
....,-
~,
'0
, ,
.~!
:, " ,
:. " j",
"
- "-
'()
"~
----, (...... "
~ ~o
n.:. _.:..
-. .'
.1 ~
\: ~
cJ 0
... Q
~~
G)
'"?
tf 3
~~
I
'0
"
Ul
.t
t
, ,
.:~
I
{:,
.y\
'0
~
" '\.
., ,
"
.....
\-1 ". Q-n "... _.__.__.__,.,_J.~-_-.:~:,~--__~~:~__~~i,t;.__:
,,")', ._,~:. -:,.-.. ~.' - ...~ - - ~
DWELLING B FLOOR PLANS
I I
......--
.
J
'J
/
$.~
}
~
~
"
)/
0:
'0
..
~
i
'^
oil
~
"
>(
;;.
~(J
..
<;'2..& .,.... Tr "
(3 c, e s..;... H oPE.J A'.EA.) f.
.su.oJO .1L.OClf__RA...r 1h:2~Z~'"
_I/'f".!,. 0'-; ..1:..0' I,
. ..
!I'A 1.['"4
,
"
16.' 0"
'"
'I.
1
, UU~ ~
""r -........" ~' .' ,," , .
~ · ... ~-U /" ,
"0 _ _ . . .
-', ., ...m. .""'...... '. '0
' '-, -~-~~7.5~'- '', -:- '..r-=--/V'~"""'~I l> .~
. 1 )( v ___
· ,,,'" -- ,- - 4 - . I I.
,. ." - I I ~.~>w
... .".....; ~ "'.v.lE~ 'I ~ . ,J I
! ~ ..... '.
I ~ , I ,G,l~~~," ~~I 't \..os e:r _I :1.)' ~
'j. \;. ~ ~ t-~ ..r 1,~ ,.
!.-r--H-I 1"0" ,X"I l\I
' . ~ OJ I z
;. . I' IT' , r;2. /,
'...1 ;, I . +--'----;'"'l ;All '~IB I~ I
"~'. '1, 0 Au.ej I
I.. . Jt.1 ~
. -&1'"' ,
:-;-rr'-,.~ I % , ;'
\'+-+-r;:,;, 11.0:; I ~ ~ . /,
'-t-., (, 2 ~ 'cO
I -Y' .}-~t-"-l,~_L~._"., ~.. 0
<:r'--J!'-' .- ". '
I' , v ~
fJED~"" i ~
..MA5 TE.Jt.. c.rr ~,' ~ , .
. , "." rJ
I "
I '.
1'4'. 0'.
(.0 FIX IILAS 5
y..
1-
C
OPfJ'1lO
1. I " ,tJ G- -Ra71.
l
y......,.
'r<..:..'_;
, .
1~2>1 F!,! ,2111>11'\..
>f. 0" IL-_.~.j'. O' ~ _~.- o'
.;- ,.
.~8:'o"
IO~O"
(..' - '1"
'1~ .,"
./
/
.;-
....
10Ft'
crT"
~
.
r-.
I'-
2'l.: 0
111'6. ,[)E~\G.Jt'...D
TR055f 5 ABoJL
(i 2..." 0 C,
.x--.....
~.~\L-
....../
St101<.L
DeTE'-TOfIV
,
I
,I
"
u
, 0
% ~
, III
'""J.
J
/;'
."I.~...#;. ~,'/~/ I ~
/-;';~.''('''~1~.. \ ~1-lC.
./_._'f.:..'?~ ---)L >4~o. ";_2."O'}
'1
_I
I
C'l
~
,5>
""",: :'".1 ~,~,-,_,~;"..~....... ~
'/
.2.'41~ "'~, .'~ lll?k ..
~~o. :, i:2.___/__u ._~'.o
58"0"
<
f),')wJ
~,~[
.,~"""':~-.l
.
2~1~ F'..
t.. .
,.
~8'-O..
0/
1;
g
<g 00
.~
o-~
j
"0
'N / / -'
.. , ,
,. ,
, ,
i
I :
oi
" ;
dl
\"II
I
!
'01
D.)
~)
~ "'"
'\'i:)
\ ;i~
I~o ""
I., I
:"
i-I
I
I T
.0
~\.:::~~,
'0
- .
ll'
,
-..-. -
,
~.~ .il i:-'_:~\ i~.~':~'~~~'~f~~:.,,:~ ,: J~?_,S.'i!!Sl;f"~"
'I
"
o-c~
.. .
, '':.I,,~ ~,.
"f~ ':i. .
(s~~('"rW.. ,,--'.1 O,U't1 d('l -.v.o~
'1i7Io....3lt \-N'1 .~"W"
~ _ _ _s~r.iJ.t!.!:!'~~__ _.oa~~5W~__
:- - - - - - - - - - - - -----;. ~
~""'""'~ -..:::::;-;~ ~ - - - - - - ~
I ilr -1------~----l/1 ~ ";
l' j~ I : 11 e q
\ I ~~ I I .~~ '9 I . ~
I ~I cO~~ f '. ~~ 'ti )
I ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ I ~,y " '<
P I (I I' ,t: ~ , .
~I 1 's .Jl I ". -~~ . '~:~:,
III ."I ~~ Q~ 1~E'--11< ';0
h: ~~] ~ ~~ , Hi) h.l, ,0-'" -1, -:'.:
~ I J.~-.I <(]..l \ ~ 9< I . I 0 s ,:1
'q 21 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~~ ' I " . cO?'" ; ~
,\ t:").. "1 -. ~ . 1 -" . 'J
I ~ I ""'" ~ .. .a " 'j
~ ~~j i,," L c(l i;".
III .-10..1 Ii: (I-- - ---:1.' .
I ~ I lSl~ < j' <$1 jI-- -- ' I '" . '.
I ~IL~~3~ ~ ~.I ~': i-T'-..:J '." .~. ~~
~] II - _ ~ _ - _ _ ~....... .. t c::: . /, ~.ij
- - ---or Ji.....,.._=... "',. I" , . \ .1 1 .. '.
~ ~ - ~'~. "', '~... ....,;.. I --," '.. ...., f .' ':;) M_~'~
~I ~ =J;"" - .. \ " ~ .,....::~
~ I :@)..+'l i ~I j ; ~....,J ',- . ,~.~'
~ ,; ," , .~.~. ; -1+i.....t.t'.; r. - I '. I ~ ~ ,.. '.;" ,L.,
, , ""'.' '" ,I f r I . ":.'
'" L .--.--.....'.- ._-,+.--++._Ll...........-~..;t.'. . ,-..
':J ~ . ." . ..., I.' .. ". [ I <.ro.. : "'.
\) I .j. :?:sa Ll -T~J~ ~ r~'t. t. ;~I!~~~ t: .{ :~..n : ~ ~~ ..r~. ':
- --- -1, ~ ! ( ~'.C,'L.",~~~ c c'ili'r~g~~.~ I~ 1 ~i. ;~9" ~ ~ '; f
C!1. II ;,t. .' Ol · .. .'~ ~l1.N-+ . I "':) . ,.
" ~ i -I, r .I,dl ~ ': 'III ~ : - : __ -1-...~~-r..lJ_;l .: I, :~~~ . ;""
-.ll S 0 os. . <:l:lC'J
\ I ~ t<l I":') .' e . ~
,;: 1;:1 "1 ," IPl~ ~ CD/ I
IL~->',~~_w._~, l..'J. -,- -'; ~: .
------.---,-----;-- - -a---:J.o.
. I I ./: '/ ~ -<I .'
I I ~~LJ-__-3 /' /" ~<4 ~
I tl)~ ~~.J. //' kf\-
~..:! uJ i=o ~,~ ~ -z
~ :~~ /~ ~~ ~
I i ~ .. ~ ~ ..)-r ~
I "'~ 4i /' ~~ ~ ~
1 ~/' ~ ~I ~
I /' ~il ) I
I/'/' C ~~~'--_/
./ /' ~ ..J.
/' /' -' ~j,
~ /' <:--..-/ ~ ~~
)
"
. ';' ,~
.... " " . 'J
-- '.~
.'
:. r
,
,
" \:~ (\~."
Y~;'i'::~:'
. :x-{~
" . ....
4 :~,::
.' .~ 't
~ >.
'0
.'
Ul
'- ,
, ,
Proposed bulldl"9 tnformatlon
"""'t bo checkod with ""provod
building pion and dOv"., . ,I or
grOdlng plan holor. .xcovallon
and con.tructlon.
Property is located in Zone X per 80<1 ,
COIIIIUnity Panel No. 270432 0002 C .. Propo.od Top 01 Block
Dated November 19, 1997. Doll.b Propo..d Goroq. Floor
"toS.'l_propo'~d Low.'1 Floor
TY~';I Bulldlnv
'5 ~~E fWlJoano~J
Established In 1962
j
LOT SURVEYS CaMP ANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
780t 73r4 AT.nu. North 8t2-G80-30D3
,....: No. G80-3G22
NlnneapoU.. Nlnno.ola GG428
8Jururyurs carrtifirnlt
, .
HIKE llAYES
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
recommended by buflder.
Property located in Section
23, Townshfp 115. Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota
No flood elevation available from
Cfty engfneerfng or watershed dept.
JA{;~~OH
II ( f'tV(\'\ \ u.. ^ 'v,.J<
-Jl~L1"'~,+~, -;-..' ~_~j #.
1lZA\ L
1\"'A\L)
r' ~)~
-Jf'1 .
'"
; r!'(
~ II
~
-x
$':1 ~
" "" ~
\-
~
\. _.
-\ 10'2-.40 - -
'ffP
.~.
ft)
t '..
tll~
t
~
4)""
~~
\. \. ,
5::>' c::> '1
./l~
:Co
, P~D-t
. : ~e$1 peNc.E
BZd'
,l@
rj>.. .
""
~./
,/ 'If' /
.// ",fJ' /'
/" /'
/
/'
,/
,I __/
I 1 ~ /""
\ ~ ,/
SO"'!.b ,.~' /....
./
,
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
p..v.~ \\-D2-
~~"J.1. 3'0
~. \'2--~ EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA
FtIJlC~O ~ I' . .. .
....
lhe only easements ehown ore from plots or record or InlOffootion
provided by eMenl. ...-
We hereby cerllly 11001 II.. i. 0 Irue and correcl repre.entalion 01
o ...rvoy 01 11041 houndarle. 01 lhe above de.crhod fond Of'" th"
locollon 01 .. bulkllng. and vl.ible encrooclrnenl.. il ony.I'om Dr on
.aid fond.
Sur~eyed by "" 1I..-S.tIL-duy 01 .Julv
( )()
1"__"
. ATTACHMENT 5
INVOICE, NC
F.B.NO. 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30'
o O.not.. Iron NO_nl
o Oenol.. Wood llub Sel
for excavotlon only
.000. 0 Oonolo. Exl.llng Elevation
~ Oonolo. Propo.ed Elevation
. Oenot.. Surlace Drolnoge
NOTE: Propo.ed or-' oro oubJect
to reslJl. of IoN lesh.
LtTT' /J.(4;A:
? 4-1ct.f> ~.?L
c.1".> ,A,,;. 'l-e,!,
sJo11<: lfl..E:"Ar/O.... of
~~O o-./ri'l'-
CULv"I'-, . e.o3.?
- ~ WZ.!1 UDN10LI~
('ft"It'^f"( ",t.t\ WA1~F-
\\~~P V~~ UA.L.V.
L Lor "rze.J.. . ~<Jr?1 l'
W~D U\Jt.F 10l1\L . ""11<:' ~ 'I"l
f'/. 'f \-\~tWt.f-" 14.t>?"
.,.I,!: \' .. ',I
, I ,t
~L-~) I G ~~~'
"
()1( 1n
--I
o Denot.. )rOO Monument
o Venole. Wood Hub Sel
for excavation 0111)'
.OOo.n D.nolo" bl.lln9 EI.vatlon
@ Venole. Propo.ed Elevotlon
~ Vonol.. Surfoc. Drohl0ge
NOTE: Propo..d 'Tode. or. .....j.cl
10 reetAIe of .oh I.. Ie.
Pr""o..d bufldfnq information
"""'I b. check.d wllh ""prov.d
buldlng pion ond d.v..., . I or
grodlng pion b.fore e,cCIYotlon
Property is located in Zone X per 80 ond con.lructlon.
C_nity Panel No. 270432 0002 C <j.1 ,Propo.ed Top of llIoclt
Oat,ed No'V" "" 19, 1997. l)o~.bProPo"d GorOQe Floor
~os.<J_pr""o.~ Lowe., l'Ioor
TY~';f Bul1d1n9
S Cwe! fWlJoartoJ
f I)~/
I I//-~" /
i .' lfJj
I ~ ~~
\ ~~~t tJoll<": ~L.l!:\lAn",... ., F
~t1/ I / VA'''- (7 "vfit"-
~~ / CtJLv"....f . fl,03.?
'.l I
"1:"j.;o~' 1 f-- -1- -
. . I I - wZ.9 Iiv-r-(1'O(,I~
"'011/ I !{\ ('f0t'^f1' tllt.H WA-(t-f-
- ~ JII// "V-
:t : . ", I ii'
, 'j' \ N
~o-:O_ \ /
t, 2,4:'~ :',\
, '\....: qf. , \' \
#'1. 1.:\
/ \1
, .p-"'; \
.,
~\
'\\
.\
\
J J
gotf>, ,
/
j
EstabUshed In 1902
LOT SURVEYS COMP ^"Y, '"C.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7801 73rd Ay.nue Nortb 812-680-3093
...." No. 660-3622
Nlnno'pollo. Nlnno.ot.. 66428
8'urUtyors ClJtrtifirnlt
MIKE (IAYEs
NOTE:Proposed ele'Vations shown
recommended by builder.
Property located in Section
23, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, "innesota
"0 flood elevation available from
City engineering or watershed dept.
~\L
^'V At 1fA\L) .l\,
,~. 11."'11"
~. ~.
-<
It} , -~ -\ \Q'2-.40 -
l-, 0
.!1~ rI'.
~~
,
JAv~.?oH
1-,;-. (~\u..
--lI.~-*=-~~+-, ,_I
~ : / IDJ.
~ (1,"" I I i'-' .
~ Ii I T
~ l/~
..p-'fl ~ I f
,s
'r
:\'
'I'
, '\..
./l~ -
~
~ ,
..~~
~"/~'o
f
I /
i, , ;111
4)
~
I
1
,
\
\
I
I (S
~11t:N'r~
/'-
/
~/~
./~':'l;Y /
, /'/ XI" ",//
: y/;: /,/
-...-/ /
/'
"
",
, ATTACHMENT 6
INVOICE N
F .B.NO 838-07,08
SCALE: 1" = 30'
~~~"
r,~'
I 1
,
/ ,:
, ,
I I
L",- l>-'ff:;A.:
H",-z..e> ~.fL
t' .1') ).? ,." 1>
\~D voVt.F- MLU.
L. l..o'r ~~A . :?4Vb~ ,cl'
I-\~Pr...-::vE:f- 100\L . S.1Ir;,~1'1
f'/. 'f I-IAfOt-o.lt.f-" 14. t> .7..
\
" I,;: \'
'~,~~~' I 6 ~ ~~'
I
sotb
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ^DDITION
,"'-
The only easement III shown ore fiom plota 01 record or lnlonnution
provided by cNenl. ...'"
W. ......eby c8...IIy Ihol Ihi. i. 0 true and cotreel "'I"..enlolion 01
o ....v.y of lhe b...-'" of ,he obov. "".cr"'d Iond and the
~:ill:.,~f 01 bulkJ/ngo and vl.ible o"crooclment.. If OIly.lro", or
Survoyed by u. th"~d...y of ,JulY l!l-1.
p....".~ \\'oZ,
I?~., ":t _-'t {HA'" ._L.~'\
1,,' \.
( ) {;~. 0 I ( L, ()
BUILDABLE AREA WITH 40 FOOT VARIANCE
r:.
-c' (;::2 f.~ ATTACHMENT 7
\' .- ! ,.--'
Mlnn n of N 1 R. . SEP 30m I.
~.1mt(~gI~c::e9~~e8to'Warn9m~~tl>~?~~~~06 .__..__29
Telephone: (651) 772-7910 Fax: (651) 772-7977 .
September 26, 2002
Ms. Cynthia Kirchoff
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372
RE: Mark Liesener Variance Application, Unnamed Tributary
Dear Ms. Kirchoff:
I have reviewed the materials you sent me regarding the }.I&V}.Iosed variance request. Our office reviewed requests
for variances on this parcel in both November and December of 1999, and provided c ",..,...ent at that time.
I note that the 1999 variance application depicted a home on the parcel proposed to be set back 30 feet from the
watercourse: (versus the 100 feet required by ordinance), and that the latest variance: request seeks approval to be
setback 24 feet.
Looking at the survey, it appears reorienting the home in a north-south fashion, closer to the west }.I1U~ line, can
increase the structure setback from the watercourse. On the enclosed copy of the survey, I took the liberty of
drawing a building envelope comparable in dimension to that on the original survey, and turned it as I suggested.
This increases the setback from the watercourse to nearly 60 feet. Please look in to whether this is a feasible
alternative. If not, I would expect that a setback of at least 30 feet, as proposed in 1999, can be met.
DNR has not objection to the variance from minimum lot size.
The watercourse does not have a federally designated floodplain associated with it. Section 11 04.308(3)b. requires
the lowest floor of a structure be at least three feet above the flood of record, three feet above the ordinary high
water level (OHW), or by conducting a technical evaluation to establish a flood protection elevation. If multiple
approaches are used, the highest flood protection elevation dctennined must be used for placing the low floor.
The proposed lowest floor of 805.9' should be compared against the OHW, which for watercourses is the top of the
bank of the channel. From the materials submitted to me for review, it was not clear where the top of channel is.
The low floor should be no less than 3 feet above the OHW.
Please call me at 651-772-7917 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~4n~
Patrick J. Lynch III
DNR Area Hydrologist
DNR Infonnation: 651-296-6157 · 1-888-646-6367 · TrY: 651-296-5484 · 1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Values Diversity
.#\ Printed on Recycled Paper Containing DNA COMMENTS
... Minimum of 20% Post-Consumer Waste
~~
r'~'
I / :
1/" ,:
~f , 1,/ /
I
~~ / L,J1~
~. t,r
1~/ //
~ ,;,'1> rt!') I
11'-- ~ I I
_G\~'o Iii / r- ~ - -{:t:4
- .. 11/ [ ~
t ,: . ,', I [i
foo"", ,n I I \ (\J
\.;~1'!\ \ /
_ri{Y I
.'0' 'l
I
~'A I'
/
,tP';
?\'"~~ bj ~..:t- ~~JAlI~?ON
\)f'I (L.. v.) ~ ,<;~.,.,J (tvnI\L.L. '#!'
o/t ~ n- ~.L ~.. '~_.-;_ ___ '.. ....
1lZA\ L
1fA\ L) ~),,)<
~.
rI''':J
~
'> : / II~-
- f" C:\ I ' ...
~ r; ~ :
~ II.. .
~ '/~ I
{'i I
~ f
~
r '.
~
~ ' .AJ-7
(j;' --\ ~'2,..,-v' - -
. "jJfJ
qJt1'!J
,
t)'I/ \
~('~
'"",~' \
\. \. "
~
~-
Q
. t,
~
.',. + !:
~ , ,UJ- .k, ..... ·
n,l~~ ~~ :.::-.~ 5::>'0'1
~ r:- t.. ,~.. ~{)
" f. <I' ~ Of''' I ::3Zo" '" -.\- .
"'~~ ~\~ J t Pf<t:)PdsE'D
<;J.<" ~ .i:1 1<""$1 7' ~Nc..E
(.P~ ~~~. ~ .n.i.i.T' 8Zc}
__t' ~~ ~ -~~~~ ~
~. f;' ,vP~ J ~
~ I td ,. : ,fJ":--'.
I .J-Ift.'~ _
If':D
\ - ,,'.....
~~t,I1,.
, '"
I
I ;- I
\
\,
C!o1.b
r~';-
10
f.-- ! (s
- s-:,')
/IT/lnY I OMINA<<. ~~I1t:Nr-:-
I I~-.
,.
./'
~ /"
./ ,/
<<. /'
~~~ /"
....'.:.'1-' /"
/
,/
,/
",.
DNA PREPARED 5111: PLAN
Lot 13~ Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
",..
./
/"
'"
/'
ry#
5~
Ll
?
i
.Jon;:
\-\~ t? vOVt
L. Lor ~Ft
\-VI(Zt:' WJ t
~.. tf t-\Af
,
I
\
I
\
\
,
\ _.f".';';~.:-"
/<~~;:. ..~", ~.". ;~ ~
/1",- "
,/.,'" tf~-.
I.':' 1:. ,.-;:
i~~J ~. ~Cf.I: <
'.'-' ~.",,, ~I'-'""
....-~. l ~.~ {.
',',-"" <J-8. ~;.-.
\::;;...:..:~~ .r'?,-
'.<eIEI: .~'
I
t
. ,'-..'
~...: ~~~':~~
'~'.I, SEP
i' I I
1;', 'I
U'\.lL
!
i
Zoning ATTACHMENT 8
1102.306 Dimensional Standards.
(1) No structure shall exceed 3 stories or 35 feet in height, whichever is less, except
as provided in subsection 1101.508.
(2) The ground floor area ratio within the R-S Use District shall not exceed 0.3.
(3) The following minimum requirements and those additional requirements,
exceptions and modifications contained in provisions (4) through (9) below and in
the Subdivision Ordinance shall govern the use and development of lots in the "R-
SIt Use District.
Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard
(acres)
~
2
100
25
10
25
(4) The depth of the front year of a lot shall be at least 25 feet. If the average depth of
at least 2 existing front yards, for buildings within 150 feet along the same block
front of the lot in question are less or greater than 35 feet, the required front yard
shall be the average depth of such existing front years. However, the depth of a
front yard shall not be less than 20 feet or be required to exceed 50 feet.
(5) Through lots shall have a required front yard on each street.
(6) The width of the side yard setback abutting a building wall shall be increased 2
inches for each 1 foot the length of the building wall exceeds 50 feet. The
additional setback will not be applied if there is a break in the building wall equal to
10% of the entire length of the wall. For the purpose of this subsection, a wall
includes any building wall within 10 degrees of being parallel to and abutting the
side lot line of a lot. (Ord. 00-08 - pub. 6/10100)
,..~
{
'....
(7) Side yard widths may be reduced if the side wall of a building is not parallel by
more than 10 degrees with the side lot line, to permit the average depth of the side
yard to conform to the minimum side yard depth in the District, but no side yard
shall be less than 5 feet deep. No side yard shall be reduced to prevent
construction of a driveway from the street into the rear of the lot unless a garage
which has access from the street is located on the lot or an alley provides a
secondary access to the rear yard of the lot.
(8) A single family dwelling which legally existed or for which a valid building permit
had been granted on or before the effective date of this Ordinance, may be
expanded by an addition or dormer, provided the addition does not extend into the
existing side yard and provided the combined width of the side yard for the building
and the adjacent building is not less than 10 feet.
(9) Any parcel which is subdivided for the purpose of creating condominium ownership
is permitted provided that the overall density created within all condominium
parcels and the common lot do not exceed the maximum density permitted within
City of Prior Lake
May 22, 1999
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Zoning Ordinance
(1 ) Natural Environment:
'r- Riparian Lots Non-Riparian Lots 1
I Area Width Area Width
~ale 10 acres 330 1 0 acres 330 J
(2) Tributarv Rivers and Streams:
, Riparian Lot Widths
I Single Family 100 feet
I Duplex 150 feet
.1 Triplex 200 feet
I Quad 250 feet
fl. There are no minimum lot area requirements for rivers and
_ streams. _I
(3) Setback Reauirements: J,
Natural Development Tributarv Rivers
Lakes "
Structure setback from 150 100 '.
OHW (feet)
Unplatted Cemetery 50 50
(feet)
Structure height 35 35
limitation (feet)
Sewage System 150 75
setback from OHWM
I (feet)
1104.302
Sewered Lakes, Lot Area, Width and Setback Requirements:
City of Prior Lake
May 1, 1999
1l04/p4
RESOLUTION 02-014PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 54,492 SQUARE FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
MINIMUM 2 ACRE LOT AREA FOR PROPERTIES ZONED RS (RURAL
SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL) AND A 40 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIRED 100 FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
WATERCOURSE A FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Mark Liesener has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit the
construction of a single family dwelling on property located in the R-S (Rural Subdivision
Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay) Districts at the following location, to wit;
4525 Jackson Trial, Prior Lake, MN, legally described as follows: Lot 13, Block 2,
Titus 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in Case
#02-097PC and held a hearing thereon on October 14, 2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The property is a legal, nonconforming lot. Although it was legally platted in 1974, it does
not meet the current minimum lot area required for properties zoned R-S. Thus, the strict
application of the ordinance would result in an undue hardship upon the property owner
because without the variance the property cannot be developed.
5. The lot complies with minimum lot width required of properties in the R-S zoning
district, but a 100 foot setback from the OHW of the tributary watercourse limits the
buildable width to a range of 15 to 25 feet, so strict interpretation of the ordinance would
result in difficulties in using the lot for a single family dwelling.
6. The property is a substandard lot of record and is unbuildable without relief from
minimum dimensional requirements. The 100 foot setback from the tributary watercourse
is a unique condition applying to a few properties within the vicinity.
1:\02fi1es\02variances\02-097\approve resolution.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
7. The lot area variance is essential for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right. A reasonable use cannot be constructed within the buildable area, so a
variance from the minimum tributary watercourse setback is necessary for the enjoyment
of the property.
8. The granting of the lot area variance will not be contrary to the intent of the R-S zoning
district, which states that its purpose is to provide suitable areas for large lot development
outside of the MUSA.
9. A demonstrable hardship is present to warrant variances from minimum lot area, because
without relief the property would remain unbuildable.
10. The applicant did not create the nonconforming lot, so the hardship results from the
application of the provisions of the zoning ordinance and not from action of the applicant.
11. The contents of Planning Case #02-097PC are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following variances to allow for the construction of a single family dwelling:
1. A 52,492 square foot variance from the required minimum 2 acre lot area in the R-
S zoning district to allow a 34,628 square foot lot (Zoning Ordinance Section
1102.306 (3) Dimensional Standards.)
2. A 40 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an unnamed tributary
watercourse. (Zoning Ordinance Section 1104.301 (3) Setback Requirements.)
The following conditions shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit for
the construction of a single family dwelling on the subject site:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. Proof of
recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be submitted to the
Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state agency
regulations.
3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits for an Individual Sewage Treatment
System (ISTS) from Scott County.
4. The ISTS shall comply with applicable regulations.
5. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted with the building permit application.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on October 14, 2002.
1:\02files\02variances\02-097\approve resol ution .doc
2
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
I :\02files\02variances\02-097\approve resolution.doc
Anthony J. Stamson, Commission Chair
3
RESOLUTION 02-015PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 76 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE 100 FOOT
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
WATERCOURSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake,
Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Mark Liesener has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to
permit the construction of a single family dwelling on property located in the
R-S (Rural Subdivision Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay) Districts at the
following location, to wit;
4525 Jackson Trial, Prior Lake, MN, legally described as follows: Lot 13,
Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as
contained in Case #02-097PC and held a hearing thereon on October 14,2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The 100 foot setback from the tributary watercourse is a unique condition
applying to a few properties within the vicinity. However, a reasonable use,
which is considered a single family dwelling with a two stall garage, can be
constructed on the property without the large setback variance.
5. The granting of the setback variance will impact the character and development
of this area. Permitting the construction of the proposed structure 24 feet from
the OHW of the watercourse will affect the perceived health, safety, and
comfort of the immediate area. Although a setback variance will need to be
granted to allow a dwelling to be constructed, staff supports the 40 foot
I :\02fi les\02variances\02-097\deny resolution .doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
variance suggested by the DNR. This variance would provide a minimum of 50
feet of buildable width at the lot's narrowest point.
6. The shoreland ordinance intends to "preserve and enhance the quality of
surface waters, preserve the economic and natural environmental values of
shoreland, and provide for the wise utilization of waters and related land
resources." The requested 76 foot variance from the required setback appears
to be inconsistent with the intent of the shoreland ordinance. However, a 40
foot variance would still allow a reasonable use to be constructed and would
provide some protection for the watercourse.
7. The 76 foot setback variance could be reduced, so the variance serves as a
convenience to the applicant. At the very least the dwelling should maintain
the 30 foot setback approved in 1999. The house footprint could be shifted or
reoriented as recommended by the DNR to significantly increase the setback
from the watercourse.
8. Although the strict application of the ordinance creates an undue hardship, the
proposed 24 foot setback is a direct result of the actions of the applicant. A
reasonable use can be constructed on the property with a 40 foot variance.
9. The contents of Planning Case #02-097PC are hereby entered into and made a
part of the public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variances to allow the construction of a single family dwelling as shown in
Attachment 1 - Certificate of Survey:
1) A 76 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from an
unnamed tributary watercourse. (Zoning Ordinance Section 1104.301
(3) Setback Requirements.)
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on October 14,2002.
Anthony J. Stamson, Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
I :\02files\02variances\02-097\deny resolution .doc
2
...
,.
"' "' ~
,
fiY '
~~ ,
" " "
./l"!-~-
Eslabllshed in 1962
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS or STATE or MINNESOTA
71101 73rd A.enue Narlb
o Denot.. "on Norunent
o Oenot.. Wood Hub Set
lor ..cavatlon only
xnoo.O Denote. EMI.tln9 Elevation
Q Denote. Propoeed [levatlon
- Denote. Surloee Dralnage
NOTE: Propaled lP"adel are IUbject
to r..tAtl of loR t..te.
Propo.ed buIldI"9 Inlormotlan
must be cheeked with approved
buMd1"9 plan and d. . . . ,. ...t or
lP"odIn9 plan before e.cavatlon
and conetructlon.
Property is located in Zone X per 800 L
COIIIIIUnity Panel No. 270432 0002 C . " Propa.ed Top of IlIock
Dated Nov.elllber 19, 1997. /)0". Propa..d Gor"9' floor
6oS."I_propa'~d lowe.' floor
TYt:"~1 Iluftdtnv
~\ L $ ~~E lWuoonoJ
-tp.\\_) ",,) ~
.JI'1'
II 1 2-lHIO-30113
F." No, 1IIIO-3G22
i'urUtynrs <atrtifirult
IIlnneapoU.. IIlnneeal. GII428
'10 I
'. 1(5
r1"'imlnY I ""","''''''' ~n<Nr~r
HIKE HAYES
Property located in Section
23, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County. Minnesota
JAu~~OH
,,'1!..!\ (~\u... A\v.)<
~".,. ~.
~~.. .... . .._-~-
~ : /IIJ. '
~ tr " + '..
.\' Ii
':1 I, ~
~ 1./('1.. ~_
I '~,' C!
qf':J ~ If)' .
~ I~. A ~:
~ L. ~-
~'~b& 1 ,P{ 1-
#0- I' J <8!> . =0
~ 0 "I ......." 3'2.'0" :t
f I j) ; Pra?FbsED
) I ~ ' . K'E$I DeNcE
'-"
, .\1.i' 8'2:=
-S)~--IL ~
~ '" ./l~~ l. ~
E .vO' >>t> ~ ~
T V" rIl...
~tf';l
F~
I
,q!!O~
~~~
I r,~'
I :
#!1t~/ ))
f . /~,,' /
~ '/Af~ I
<q ",",' I
'~7
~f "'01'1<: tfl-E:VAf"{ON eF
\ ~. / ~ / lU'A." ""rip-
": _ ~ . (U~/ /: _1_ ttJLvt;if<--r . &03.3
IS.o ,[;/- I I - - WZ.~ tl0N10LIF-
" II f ,f) (GfPlt\If'1' "It-H WAl"'t-f-
_a ~ "/ I v-
~ ' 1, I !\.
,],(/, \ N
~~~i>~ ,1\ ~ /
,,\;~, \!
~. I :\
/ \'
.~/
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
reco.aended by builder.
No flood elevation available from
City engineering or watershed dept.
tI'':'
I..
It)' -- -\ 10'2..40 -
""~
t
<@)
Sc>'O'I
)
\
\
\
\
\
'"
,/
.~-~ /'
.~VJ ,/
I //':"'1'" ,/
I ,/,'/
/. I~'/ ,-/'
\~. .-
..,1.b -------' ,// .-
,;-
...
The only easement. shown ore 'fi om plots of record or infonnotion
fM"avlded by eIlent. .; -
We hereby cerlify thot this i. 0 Irue and correcl reprelentation of
o ....v.y 01 lhe boundar I.. of ,he obov. d..crlhed land and 110"
location 01 aI bulIclIrl9. and vllible encrooetmenll, if ...y. from or on
.aid Iond.
Surveyed by us thi.--!l.tIL-doy "f .Julv
INVOICE NO. 63269 .
F.B.NO. 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 3D'
LM" ft.~A.'.
Hb7-e. ~.?t
t?1"J A.:;,.e~
~p voVt,,~ lIA\..J...I.
L. l..oT"" "p!e.A .. ~'i/l;> ~'1"
\-I~Ot.aJt.f- 'f~ - SIIt::>"'r?\
t7- q" \\Af-vtWtf- '" 14,f.>'1..
\
Ii t"
!;( SfP I 6. i) I.
U\~~- -JUJ
I
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
P<",~ u_ l)(),Q 1( Ln
~~.1. 3.oz (~~I~f9ned LYo /
~. \'Z--.."Ol ~kliii Chmew r. A""" ATTACHMENT 1
J?t:V\~o ~ I . \~ GrI9O'"Y R. PrOl
19-"
.. _"_.." .. _..,...._."..__...,._...-_. ~..........__...___......;, _.~......_._":"_";""'",-:-_.,,_~ ........__..___.......... ,,,....... .~......._.___..,........_~. ....--.;..."......._........_..._...._~__~_.. _._~..' _ :--'---'~'~_"'_'~ -. '-.' .J..._..~.. ..._ _.,~....~..... .~,..._...__.,__~._,............~.....,...~._,.......:-. ....__~_.__....._..___;. __....~......_.... ...___ ,,_.0"
~ailing
Information
and Lists
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
AfifilDA VIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
)ss
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
~,~ of the City of Prior Lake, !;;o1J!1ty of Scott, State of
Minnesota, being dutsworn, says on the ~ day of ~. ,2002, she served
the attached list of persons to have an interest in the ~1 {)A J ~.
+ (j 2- - ~I , by mailing to them a copy thereof,
enclosed in an ertvelope, postage prepaid, and be depositing same in the post office at
Prior Lake, Minnesota, the last known address of the parties.
Subscribed and sworn to be this
day of , 2000.
NOTARY PUBLIC
-
l :IDEPTWORK\BLANKFRM\MAILAFFD.DOC
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VARIANCES FROM THE
ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest
of the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday,
October 14,2002, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
REQUESTS:
The applicant is requesting a 54,492 square foot variance from
the minimum 2 acre lot area for properties zoned RS (Rural
Subdivision Residential) and a 76 foot variance from the required
100 foot minimum setback from an unnamed tributary for the
construction of a single family dwelling.
APPLICANT:
Mark Liesener
SUBJECT SITE:
4525 Jackson Trail, Prior Lake, MN, legally described as Lot
13, Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to
this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling
447-9810 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The
Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written
comments should relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are
or are not consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and variance hardship criteria.
Prepared this 24th day of September 2002.
Cynthia Kirchoff, AICP, Planner
City of Prior Lake
To be mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject site on October 3, 2002.
L: \02FILES\02variances \02-097\Mailed Notice.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
EBlabllBhed in 1962
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER TilE LAWS Of' STATE or MINNESOTA
71101 73rd A".nu. Nortb 1112-11110-3093
Fa.. No. 11110-31122
..
MloDUPOU" Mlon..ota 1111428
!turUtynrs CJttrtifirnlt
HIKE HAm;
Property located in Section
23, Township 115, Range 22,
Scott County, Mi nnesota
NOTE:Proposed elevations shown
recOllllended by bufl der .
No flood elevation available from
City engineering or watershed dept.
INVOICE NO. ~69 '
F.B.NO 838-07.08
SCALE: 1" = 30'
o Denot.. Iron MOfU11ent
o Denot.. Wood Hub S.t
lor excavotlon only
.000.0 Denote. Exl.t,"", Eleyotlon
~ Denote. Propo..d Eleyotlon
--- Oenot.. Surlac. Drolnoge
NOTE: Propo.ed '7odeo are .ubJect
to retNtl of loR t.....
Propo..d bufkII"9 information
rnuot be checked with ""","oyed
boldlng pion and deYelopment or
orodln9 pIm befor. ..cavotlon
and conetructlon.
Property is located in Zone X per Boa'
C~Jn1ty Panel No. 270432 0002 C ,. Propo.ed Top of llIock
Dated Nov.emer 19, 1997. ~OJ>.b.Propo.ed Goroqe floor
&os.'l_pr_.~d Lowe.t floor
Ty~~r Bullq
5 ~t.SE fTNuoanoJ
JA{A:~.~oH ~\L
^\V~ 1fAIL.) ^V~
,;c. ~.
I ~
i'~ M-
~/+ I
> 1"\8~1.- leo <'do"
~ or . 3'2.'0" :t
t l:b . Pl<DfbsED
I I ~ . . ~E$I PENC.E
I .ITf'''h. Bz'd'
-s:>.)-" - - '-
~ ./''4, l <fB>
f; 0':' ~
~ .o(f #' _.n~.
I v .
t.,ll !'. ( ~\u...
'J'~
J'~~. . .~-~1~-1
II. J .
./ ~
~ t " t 'o"
.\' Ii
I
'"
.,.
-:l
I;)
-r.
..p-~
-s:
,s
.....
... ... ~
,
~~
,
, ,
v1J~~'
I
10 f
f-_ -! s--;\ I
I 1If/(,tiY p,teI'Il"'/l1t{;
,
"
~....,.""
.~t?
.q1!J~
~,,-;~.40-# Ai,
l I/~r;/ /
i .'I L"'~
\ i ~
~!~t rJo-n<: ~l-","A.nof.l ..;::
": _ ~ . ~/!./ / ~f _ _ f:~::/~";,....
"";.0 .f+../ r I ~ wz.9 VON-ro~l~
'" . II I: .{\ {~tVf>f t\\t.ti WA-(~f"
_O~j.11 ~
:t " . I fi
" [!, \ N
~O.,o' \ /
U':1' \
,,~.t". \!
~. /'\
/\1
'tP'j
.,,-;.
t
@}>
! Ie;
~~I1~~ .
/'"
)
\
\
\
\
'"
./
//,
...........-; .
_ " \Dry ",
I /--: ,?y>' /'
II /" ___ /'
IY"" ---",'
\ ..-
, '
S01-b ------- - ", '"
./
,
The onty easements shown ore ff-om pots of record or in'orrnution
provided by cfient. ... '
We hereby ce.-tify Il10t this i. 0 true and correel repre.entotion 01
o ....yey 01 the boundar Ie. 01 the above de.erllled Iond olld the
Iocotion 01 .. bulldlng. and yl.lbIe encroochment.. il ,,"y.lrom or on
.aid land.
S...eyod by ... thi._._'.tIL-duv or .JulY
'"
./
~~~
r'~'
I I
I
) ,:
, j
II
L",- f..~A:
3+"""Z-f> ~,?t
o-1t>y A~~e'"
\\NZ-D V~F- VA.W.
L. Lor "~A . ~~, 1"
\-I~P~f1Z- 'fomL - S>\I""~1't
'7- t:f l-\~tQ./tf-" 14.177..
\
I ~> . ' :
: 1\ stP I 6 3& i J j,
'U\~: ~lj)
I
Lot 13, Block 2, TITUS 2ND ADDITION
1'.' i.
n / '
\ . . I /
r:z..,j. ~ \I '02- . ) i / .
~E-J,1-3.o7. (~" (~-~ (j.Q,-
~ '~Ivnod .
~. \-z.-~..ol ~L Chmo. r. """...on, Mm. Reg. No.217!lJ or
f.t\I\~O ~ \'. \~ Gregory R ,.....r.1\ NIm Reg No. 249"2
lqJ'
Smooth Feed Sheets™
Use template for 5162@
BRENDA J MILLER
13208 HENNING eIR NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
JEROLD A & ROSEANN CAMP AGNO
13200 HENNING CIR NE
PRIORLAKEMN 55372
NANCY M JEPSON
13207 HENNING CIR
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
SCOTT VIG
13171 PIKE LAKE TRLNE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
PHYLLIS A MILLER
15563 CALMUT AVE SE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
ROBERT W & KRIS A OSTDIEK
4510 JACKSON TRL NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
JEl'l'KEY A&DINAMMENKE
4511 JACKSON TRL NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
JOHN O'LOUGHLIN
2988 VALLEY VIEW RD
SHAKOPEE MN 55379
JAMES A JR & ANNICK K STRAU
2318 PIKE LAKE RD
SHAKOPEE MN 55379
~Vv\.~ LA ~~~U
brvt-
__'"'.",".._~_ ""'f<' "1 "" '... ~"_ '-::::'~,.~..:;..._.._,,~....-..l-l.~.~
- .. ......; ':
Property Owners List
Leisner Variance
PID SHSRTN SHHOUS SHSTRE SHCITY Sf-.SHZIP HOUSGS STREGS STn A[ PRPLA T PRuI-'Ki::i...EGAL 1
COM NE COR, SE 135.92', SW 82.30', SE
250720011 CAMPAGNOLl,JEROLD A & ROSE,AI~3200 HENNING CIR NE PRIOR LAKE M~155372 0 PLAT-25072 TITUS 1ST ADDN 1 1 122.5', SW 80', N N LINE, E 80' TO POB
250720020 CAMPAGNOLl,JEROLD A & ROSE/lM3200 HENNING CIR NE PRIOR LAKE M1'155372 13200 HENNING CIR NE PLAT-25072 TITUS 1ST ADDN 2 1
250870250 L1ESENER,MARK L & LOIS L 8679 SUNSET CT SHAKO PEE MI'155379 4525 JACKSON TRL NE PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 13 2
250870260 MENKE,JEFFREY A & DINA M 4511 JACKSON TRL NE PRIOR LAKE M~'155372 4511 JACKSON TRL NE PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 14 2
EX COM NE COR, SE 135.92', SW 82.30',
SE 122.50', SW 80', N TO N LINE, E 80'
250720010 MILLER, BRENDA J 13208 HENNING CIR NE PRIOR LAKE MN55372 13208 HENNING CIR NE PLAT-25072 TITUS 1ST ADDN 1 1 TO POB
& LOT 6 LYING W OF LINE COM NECOR
OF LOT 6, S TO PT ON S LINE OF 6
54.01' W OF SE COR OF 7 & LOTS 7-10
BLK 1 & LOTS 8-12 BLK 2 & W PIO LOT 7
250870060 MILLER,PHYLLlS A 15563 CALMUT AV SE PRIOR LAKE MN55372 0 PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 7-9 1 BLK2
& LOT 6 LYING W OF LINE COM NECOR
OF LOT 6, S TO PT ON S LINE OF 6
54.01' W OF SE COR OF 7 & LOTS 7-10
BLK 1 & LOTS 8-12 BLK 2 & W PIO LOT 7
250870060 MILLER,PHYLLlS A 15563 CALMUT AV SE PRIOR LAKE M~155372 0 PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 7-9 1 BLK2
& LOT 6 LYING W OF LINE COM NECOR
OF LOT 6, S TO PT ON S LINE OF 6
54.01' W OF SE COR OF 7 & LOTS 7-10
BLK 1 & LOTS 8-12 BLK 2 & W PIO LOT 7
250870060 MILLER,PHYLLlS A 15563 CALMUT AV SE PRIOR LAKE MI'155372 0 PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 7-9 1 BLK2
& LOT 6 LYING W OF LINE COM NECOR
OF LOT 6, S TO PT ON S LINE OF 6
54.01' W OF SE COR OF 7 & LOTS 7-10
BLK 1 & LOTS 8-12 BLK 2 & W PIO LOT 7
250870060 MILLER,PHYLLlS A 15563 CALMUT AV SE PRIOR LAKE MN55372 0 PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 7-9 1 BLK2
& LOT 6 LYING W OF LINE COM NECOR
OF LOT 6, S TO PT ON S LINE OF 6
54.01' W OF SE COR OF 7 & LOTS 7-10
BLK 1 & LOTS 8-12 BLK 2 & W PIO LOT 7
250870060 MILLER,PHYLLlS A 15563 CALMUT AV SE PRIOR LAKE MN55372 0 PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 7-9 1 BLK2
250870270 MILLER,PHYLLlS A 15563 CALMUT AV SE PRIOR LAKE MN55372 0 PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN O-L A
250870110 OSTDIEK,ROBERT W & KRIS A 4510 JACKSON TRL NE PRIOR LAKE M~'155372 4510 JACKSON TRL NE PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 11 1 & LOT 12
250870110 OSTDIEK,ROBERT W & KRIS A 4510 JACKSON TRL NE PRIOR LAKE MN55372 4510 JACKSON TRL NE PLAT-25087 TITUS 2ND ADDN 11 1 & LOT 12
250720320 VIG,SCOTT 13171 PIKE LAKE TRL NE PRIOR LAKE Mt,l55372 13171 PIKE LAKE TRL NE PLAT-25072 TITUS 1ST ADDN O-L B
mail list
10/3/2002
. Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
. Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
. Attach this card to the back of the mail piece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
A. Received by (Please Print fir!... rly)
f/PL
C. Signature '~
~d~m1?
If YES, enter delivery address below:
B. Date of Delivery
//~~l' Z'17-)
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
o Agent
o Addressee
DYes
o No
~k L..'\~e,V\eV
)~,^/~\OH. ~,?\~_
J~O ~~~
~~ lM-4 SS'l3B
3. Se~ Type
C"Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
o Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
o Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
I 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service label)
PS Form 3811, July 1999
Domestic Return Receipt
102595-99-M-1789
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
. Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box ·
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
C-(o ~~ ~~
0"1 Iltltllllllllllllll.IIII.11111I1 III II 111.1 . 1111I 1Il11 I1I1I it.t
Pro Jerty ONners wit lin 350'
Leisner Variance
/ )
\\
~/31
500
I
o
500 Feet
I
/ /
./ -----
~
~
~
m
~.ll
~Tm
~
N
NEW ABSTRACTS
CONTINUATIONS
CLOSING SERVICE
REGISTERED PROPERTY ABSTRACTS
TITLE INSURANCE
RECORDING SERVICE
SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC.
223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
DAVID E. MOON EN
Phone: (952) 445-6246
Fax: (952) 445-0229
August 8, 2002
Mark Liesener
8679 Sunset Court
Shakopee, MN 55379
To Whom it May Concern:
According to the 2002 tax records in the Scott County Treasurer's Office, the following persons
listed on Exhibit "A!' are the owners of the property which lies within 350 feet ofthe following
described property:
Lot 13, Block 2, Titus 2nd Addition, Scott County, Minnesota.
, j"'~P
( ~c
David E. Moonen
President
Scott County Abstract & Title, Inc.
MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
BRENDA J MILLER
13208 HENNING CIR NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
JEROLD A & ROSEANN CAMP AGNO
13200 HENNING CIR NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
NANCY M JEPSON
13207 HENNING CIR
PRIORLAKEMN 55372
SCOTT VIG
13171 PIKE LAKE TRL NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
PHYLLIS A MIT JER
15563 CALMUT AVE SE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
ROBERT W & KRIS A OSTDIEK
4510 JACKSON TRL NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
JEt't'KEY A & DINA M MENKE
4511 JACKSON TRL NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
JOHN O'LOUGHLIN
2988 VAT JF.Y VIEW RD
SHAKOPEE MN 55379
JAMES A JR & ANNICK K STRAU
2318 PIKE LAKE RD
SHAKOPEE MN 55379
,- ; >
"4' .\':
'-,;
~. _') , r-: :.':';..','" (~. .
.. '
I...... .,.,.. au....
10.)14
I. ..... C....."... ...OCI.'''.
, ...,......... ......I'CM...
".
:' ~.
, !t,. :f':"'I..
~', \:,' :-....,.......... ,;',. It,.. . \',
"..;...-,t?:' ,
.' .
. f ~
. \/.:,,;J;
I'
N
//2
NUL "'."".....
."u,
..nt.
\
'",
..: "J'
;~<!s:;;~'W.;:}.:~'0 .;': .i:i~> ~ '"
"
'.:.~ :.,~.::,.\ '::(~:.i;,~..;.:~.:\;;~~~N1~:iil..~~~.~(J. ~ ",. ~
'';)'1 '
, .,
.\. ~\ ~\
1:'.\',:..\" .'
~l;
,i'",_)
'~)p1 '
, ...
..
SEC. 23
T 1/5 R. 22
. ..I
"
.
OlIn.or c ~ c.,
~\~
4
...
.
.
r
I 1
I
'---
........ ~C.
.tllI-
- JO'" II ,..U
I '.. . 140'" .
I
4~':=1
pj"'/ ~~. ~
~ ~ !II
~~..... f'of:! If!
~~ , I(
~, .' ~'
\\) ,1
1.1 ~,/I
1('
nu..
I
"" lU)--.; ').
. I
01
(~\
".... .