Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout060396 Regular MINUTES OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL June 3, 1996 1. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Andren called the meeting of the Common Council to order on Monday, June 3, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Present were: Mayor Andren, Councilmembers Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, City Manager Boyles, Public Works Director Anderson, Planning Director Rye, Parks and Recreation Director Hokeness, Assistant Engineer Wingard, Finance Director Teschner, Assistant City Attorney Walston, and Assistant City Manager/Recording Secretary Tremere. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Andren led the Pledge of Allegiance and welcomed everyone to the meeting. 3. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES The Mayor noted the correct spelling of Duane Melling's last name on page 6. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECONDED BY KEDROWSKI TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 20, 1996 MINUTES AS AMENDED. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, and Schenck; Mader abstained since he was not at the previous meeting; the motion carried 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Consider Approval of Invoices to be Paid. B. Consider Adoption of Resolution 96-65 Approving the Final Plat of The Res 9665 Wilds 2nd Addition and Developer's Agreement. . The Wilds C. Consider Approval of Final Payment for Prior South, Project #94-02. Proj. 9402 D. Consider Utilization of a Money Manager to Enhance the City's Investment Portfolio Return. l~loney Mgr E. Consider Approval of Appointment of New Member to the Planning Commission. 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY MADER TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, EXCEPT FOR ITEMS 4-A, 4-B, AND 4-D, WHICH WILL CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. The first item was Item 4-B, Consider Adoption of Resolution 96-65 Approving the Final Plat of The Wilds 2nd Addition and Developer's Agreement. Councilmember Mader observed that the language in the draft resolution did not refer to the developers agreement. The City Manager recommended adding a Condition No. 7 specifying approval of the developers contract. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY SCHENCK TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 96-65 APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF "THE WILDS 2ND ADDITION" AND DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT AND SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE FINAL PLAT Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. The next item was Item 4-D, Consider Utilization of a Money Manager to Enhance the City's Investment Portfolio Return. - Councilmember Mader noted recent Council discussion and he reviewed the data in the Staff Agenda Report. He said he had considered the positive and negative aspects identified in the Report, and he concluded the upsides were not that prevalent. He recommended the Council retain the present process with staff-managed investments. Extensive discussion ensued. Councilmember Kedrowski disagreed and noted the Council had asked staff to bring recommendations to the council; as city grows, outside services with special expertise are needed to assist staff. Councilmember Mader stated the firm in this case would not advise staff, but, rather, would invest City money He also commented that the record presented in the report includes a banner year; the Council should look at the other four years; it is not clear this is needed. Councilmember Kedrowski asked Finance Director Teschner to speak to the recommendation. Director Teschner noted the ranking of the C.H. Brown money management firm; a "worst case" scenario was shown to indicate the possibility of a drop in interest rates. He confirmed Councilmember Mader's observation that the Brown firm would have control of the money. M060396.DOC 2 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 Director Teschner stated the past performance was impressive, and the evaluation should be for the long term. The staff concern is to maximize the rate of return, and this program offers a way to do that with minimal risk. Councilmember Schenck observed that the staff record is so good so far; thus, the question, why change? Director Teschner responded that he does not have the resources of a money manager. Councilmember Schenck wondered if the Council could invest only about $500,000, with staff managing the rest. The Council could ultimately review the comparative results through periodic staff reports. Councilmember Mader explained that he does not see this as a high risk investment, but it is a change in the city's philosophy and practice, and the increase in return is not significant. Councilmember Greenfield said he appreciates Councilmember Mader's point; and, Councilmember Kedrowski's concern is one of timing. The amount is relatively not substantial in terms of overall investment strategy, thus, the City should track the timing of investments more carefully. The Mayor stated she could not support the recommendation and the Council should continue to be conservative with the public's money. MOTION BY ANDREN, SECONDED BY MADER TO DENY THE PROPOSED MONEY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Schenck, and Mader; Kedrowski, nay; the motion carried. The next item was consideration of Item 4-A, Consider Approval of Invoices to be Paid. Councilmember Greenfield asked Director Teschner to clarify the park supply items. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECONDED BY KEDROWSKI TO APPROVE THE INVOICES SCHEDULED FOR PAYMENT JUNE 4, 1996. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. 5. PRESENTATIONS - None 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None 7. OLD BUSINESS: A. Consider Approval of Resolution 96-62 Waiving Park Support Fees for Res 9662 Independent School District #719 for the Westwood Elementary SchlOCk Sup Fees M060396.DOC 3 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 Improvement Project. - The City Manager explained the purpose of the action and the recommendation. Marge Kinney from the Prior Lake School Board inquired whether the consideration was for only the Westwood Elementary School project. The Mayor and the City Manager responded in the affirmative. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY SCHENCK TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 96-62 AUTHORIZING PARTIAL FEE WAIVER FOR WESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Ms. Kinney thanked the Council for the action. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. B. Consider Approval of Vacation of Street Easement for portions of Chatonka Beach Trail. - The Mayor stepped down as she had at the public hearing, due to a conflict of interest; she handed the gavel to Mayor Pro Tem Greenfield. The City Manager explained the background per the Staff Agenda Report, and the need for a 4/5 vote. He explained that the public hearing has been held and closed. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY MADER TO 9629 APPROVE RESOLUTION 96-29 VACATING PART OF THE Chatonka ROADWAY EASEMENT (RETAINING UTILITY EASEMENT) Bch Trl LOCATED ON THE OLD CHATONKA BEACH TRAIL, LOCATED NORTH OF EXISTING BEACH STREET AND EAST OF BLUEBIRD TRAIL Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. The meeting recessed at 8:08 p.m. and the Mayor resumed the chair and the meeting at 8:12 p.m. C. Consider Approval of Change Order for Northwood Road Improvement Project. - The City Manager introduced the item and explained the .Chg. Order recommendation per the Staff Agenda Report. 1~ Road MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY SCHENCK TO AUTHORIZE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AS A DECREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,466.58 TO VALLEY PAVING, INC. M060396.DOC 4 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 Councilmember Greenfield clarified the purpose of the change order. Councilmember Mader commented about the Staff Agenda Report and possible savings. Assistant Engineer Wingard explained how estimates are made, especially where milling is involved. Quantities are measured daily, and the estimates could change somewhat Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. D. Consider Approval of Cooperative Agreement between the City of Prior CSAI-I 21 Lake and Scott County for County Road 21 (from Fish Point Road to the east city limits). The City Manager explained that the County has completed the necessary work to get the project underway. He said there were several issues for the Council to discuss: street lighting, landscaping, and restricted parking along County Road 21. Director Anderson explained the proposed street lighting; he recalled earlier Council discussions on the extent of lighting; he noted evolution of trail planning and discussions of whether trail lighting was needed or even desired. Staff has determined that some of the existing wood poles are rotting and will be maintenance problems. Traditional lighting fixtures have been viewed negatively. Plans were prepared without lighting; thus, the issue for the Council is whether to include it. He explained a second issue is the landscaping and the recommendation to acquire equipment that would be retained by the city once the work in the County Road 21 project is done. He noted the practical difficulties in planting and the staff position that the proposed equipment would enhance productivity; the alternative is to include the landscaping in the contract. The Mayor recalled that the Council allocated money for lighting and asked whether the amount--about $100,000--was adequate. Director Anderson said the amount appears to be inadequate, given the cost of the light standards used elsewhere along County Road 21. He explained approximately $70,000 more than estimated in the original project study was necessary to get the appropriate lighting. Councilmember Mader clarified that the proposed fixtures would be of materials other than the existing wood. Extensive discussion ensued. The Mayor cited the Staff Agenda Report and observed that the specific costs for lighting were not clear. The City Manager commented that, over time, the cost estimates have changed. Director Anderson confirmed for the Mayor that the spacing between light fixtures was less. Councilmember Kedrowski verified that the closer spacing would result in better lighting. M060396.DOC 5 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 The Mayor said there were also questions about the landscaping. She recalled that the original plans represented to the public what bonds were needed for; while lighting was included, the proposed landscaping is a change. Further discussion ensued and Director Hokeness and Director Anderson explained the source of materials. The Mayor questioned the acquisition of equipment for the tree planting; the City did not include equipment in the bond issue; she asked the City Attorney about the use of bond proceeds for purposes not specifically stated in the bond sale. Attomey Walston responded; he said that, generally, the capital acquisition that would benefit this project and other projects should be. in accordance with contracting laws. Director Anderson responded to the Mayor that the staff finds the proposed acquisition would be lawful and appropriate. The Mayor suggested that the attorney should investigate this. The Mayor said she also was concerned about the cost of a city entrance monument--about $12,000--which was not specifically addressed in the bond sale information. She questioned the need for the monument. Councilmember Kedrowski clarified with Director Anderson the proposed tree spade and trailer acquisition. He asked the City Attorney about the appropriateness of acquiring the equipment. Attorney Walston said he would need to research the law and report to the Council. The Mayor said the item should be tabled so the Attorney can check on the matter. Director Teschner said he did discuss this with the City's bond attorney at Briggs and Morgan; it was noted that the original project was broadly defined, and the Council has a wide latitude on this. He said a written opinion could be obtained. Councilmember Mader said he saw three issues: first, the lighting; and he prefers to light the way for safety and security; second, the tree spade and trailer may make practical and economic sense; however, they should be purchased with funds from the equipment fund not the bond proceeds; third, the proposed monument is outside the realm of landscaping and was not in the original bond sale information. He suggested that the Council should deal with the lighting issue, and treat the equipment issue and monument as independent matters. MOTION BY MADER, SECONDED BY ANDREN TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 96-60 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CSAH 21, THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH SCOTT COUNTY AND STREET LIGHTING M060396.DOC 6 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 PER THE ORIGINAL APPROVED PLANS, WITH FUNDING FOR LANDSCAPING AND THE ACQUISITION OF A TREE SPADE AND TRAILER TO BE REVIEWED FURTHER The Mayor indicated that the Council should strike specific language in the draft resolution to accomplish the purpose of the motion. Director Anderson recommended that staff could revise the resolution per Council direction and return it at a subsequent meeting. The Mayor agreed and withdrew the motion; Councilmember Mader withdrew his second. MOTION BY ANDREN, SECONDED BY KEDROWSKI TO TABLE FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF CSAH 21 PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS AND TO DIRECT STAFF TO REVIEW THE ITEM IN LIGHT OF COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND RETURN WITH AN OPINION FROM BOND COUNSEL AND A REVISED DRAFT RESOLUTION. Further discussion ensued about the source of funds and the priority the tree spade and trailer had with other capital items included in the Equipment Fund. Councilmember Schenck stated the project was a mandate within the context of the original bonding; the equipment acquisition proposed by staff makes sense. The Mayor commented that the key issue was the apparent tendency to use bond proceeds for purposes other than those included in the initial bond issue plans; this constitutes a policy developing based upon practice which is a problem. Councilmember Schenck asked, if the monument is considered part of the landscape program, how much should the Council pick apart the landscaping? Councilmember Mader said he does not consider the monument a part of the landscaping. Councilmember Greenfield noted the Council's effort to pick lighting fixtures based upon best interests of city. The Council should not box itself in with plan details that are consistent with the purpose of approved projects. Councilmember Kedrowski withdrew the second to the motion to table. Councilmember Mader seconded the motion to table. The Mayor called for a vote. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren and Mader; nays by Greenfield, Kedrowski and Schenck, the motion failed. M060396.DOC 7 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 Councilmember Kedrowski said there were three issues to be clarified: 1) the street lighting; 2) the acquisition of a tree spade and trailer and the appropriateness of using bond proceeds; and, 3) the inclusion of a City entrance monument. He suggested that the Council should vote for or against each item with no alternatives. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY SCI-IENCK TO TABLE THE CONSIDERATION OF STREET LIGHTING RELATIVE TO THE CSAH 21 PROJECT. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Mader, Kedrowski and Schenck, the motion carried. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY GREENFIELD TO AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $18,000 OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PROCEEDS TO PURCHASE A TREE SPADE AND TRAILER AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF FOR THE CSAH 21 PROJECT. The Mayor reiterated her concerns. Director Hokeness clarified that he was unable to dedicate city staff to landscaping future county road projects. During further discussion, Councilmember Greenfield asked whether the tree spade and trailer would be used for city landscaping projects, albeit not county highway work. Director Hokeness responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Mader said his concern is that there seems to be conflicting views on the priority to get this equipment. He referred to Director Teschner's remarks, and said this is either a good investment or it is not. The City should not buy the equipment just because there is money available for a project. The Mayor agreed and called for a vote. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Greenfield, Kedrowski and Schenck, nays by Mader and Andren. The motion carried. The meeting recessed at 9:18 p.m. and resumed at 9:26 p.m. Councilmember Greenfield said the purpose and desirability of city entrance monuments was clear: they provide identity and they are part of the public landscaping; further, they can be lighted and be part of the public lighting; therefore making a positive statement about the city. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECONDED BY SCHENCK TO AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $12,000 OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PROCEEDS TO PURCHASE A M060396.DOC 8 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 CITY ENTRANCE MONUMENT AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AS EITHER A LIGHTING OR LANDSCAPING TREATMENT, OR BOTH, FOR THE CSAH 21 PROJECT. The Mayor said she is concemed that a monument for that kind of money is displacing other projects which are unfunded or underfunded. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Greenfield, Kedrowski and Schenck; nays by Mader and Andren. The motion carried. E. Receive Report on Lot Coverage Limitations in the Residential Zoning Districts. - The City Manager reviewed the recommendation of the Staff Agenda Report and commented that the file research indicated the specific reason for the current standards was unclear. The Mayor recalled the general reasons, including concerns about density and small lot sizes. Councilmember Kedrowski commented that the Council had discussed the matter in some detail earlier; he asked the Planning Director for his views. Director Rye said he saw a high probability of additional variance requests unless the maximum lot coverage standards in the R-2 District are repealed as well. The Mayor commented that there are not that many vacant lots in that district. Director Rye agreed that there may not be a critical situation in the short term, but the lack of consistency among districts could have long term implications. He suggested that the lot coverage issue needs to be reconsidered, and he recommended that the issue be reviewed within the context of updating the entire ordinance. MOTION BY ANDREN, SECONDED BY KEDROWSKI TO Lot Coverage ACCEPT THE STAFF REPORT ON LOT COVERAGE LIMITATIONS IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS AS SUBMITTED. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. 8. NEW BUSINESS: A. Consider Approval of Resolution 96-64 Approving a Request of Robert W. . 9664 Ostdiek to Permit the Construction of a Pole Building in the R-1 Suburban Pole Barn Residential District. - The item was introduced by the City Manager. Director Rye explained the Staff Agenda Report, including the consideration by the Planning Commission. He said that the matter before the Council was whether to allow the proposed pole building; the matter of an area variance was considered by the Commission. The City Code vests with the Council the final determination of allowing pole buildings, M060396.DOC 9 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 regardless of the need for variances. He explained the staff recommendation for denial; he suggested that the Council may consider direction to review the zoning of the property at some time. The Mayor commented that this is odd area from a zoning perspective; it is rural with suburban characteristics. She disagreed with the Planning Commission action, but supports approval of the pole barn without variances. MOTION BY ANDREN, SECONDED BY KEDROWSKI TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REQUEST OF ROBERT W. OSTDIEK TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A POLE BUILDING IN THE R-1 SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AT 4510 JACKSON TRAIL N.E. Discussion ensued and Councilmember Kedrowski reiterated what was before the Council at this time. He suggested the approval should include specific reasons for the action. The City Attorney concurred, as did Assistant Manager Tremere who recalled the history of another pole barn allowed in this area. The Council had specified the reasons for the approval. Councilmember Mader verified that the Planning Commission's action was to approve an area variance. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. B. Consider Approval of 1997-2001 Capital Improvement Program - The Cap Improvem City Manager introduced the item and noted there are several issues: Program annual tax impact, community park funding, library improvements, developer-requested projects, and Five Hawks-Highway 13-CSAH 23 signals and realignment project. Director Anderson responded to questions from Councilmember Greenfield regarding projected costs. Councilmember Mader said the purpose of the Council consideration at this time is to provide guidance for planned capital needs. Funds earmarked for one thing should not be used for other purposes. Councilmember Kedrowski commented about the library proposals and indicated the "redecorating" option mentioned in the Staff Agenda Report should address Americans with Disabilities Act issues. The City Manager said the Council could allocate the funds, and if the ADA modifications become an issue the available funds can be used, whatever amount is M060396.DOC 10 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 approved for general remodeling. The improvements are not in the CIP now, direction from the Council is needed. Councilmember Kedrowski inquired whether the redecorating will make that much difference as to the use of the building. The City Manager commented on possible uses of the Library Building and said the need for at least basic remodeling is fairly urgent. Director Teschner presented the financial data and explained the recommendations, including not spreading funds for the library improvements over five years. Councilmember Mader commented that the library is not a high point in the City, and the Council has heard from citizens about the need for improvements, including a new facility. If the building is to go, then the City should not invest in substantial improvements. However, since there are not long term plans or funding for a new library, then the City should repair it. Councilmember Kedrowski suggested the costs could be spread over two years. The Mayor said the Council need to address this now; there are some other options including relocating the facility to other available and suitable areas. Director Teschner reviewed funding options; he said that Council Contingency funds may be available and there could be a fund balance later in the year. The traditional CIP route is not the sole way to do this project. Councilmember Kedrowski commented about the signals and realignment near Five Hawks; he said the issue was the priority for this project, given the new road in the area. Director Anderson responded. The Mayor recognized Mr. Dar Fosse, Five Hawks Principal, who recalled the petition to get a signal. He explained the traffic concerns given the new developments, and said there is a basic issue of safety. He requested that the signal be given high priority. Councilmember Greenfield inquired about the levy impact of the Five Hawks project. Director Teschner said there would be none, given the use of MSA funds for some of the improvements. There was further discussion about whether this project could be done in 1997. Director Anderson commented on the collector street fund and the policy to avoid the use of ad valorem taxes. The Mayor suggested keeping the M060396.DOC 1 1 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 project in the 1998 plan which would allow the school district to finalize its organizational plans. Councilmember Kedrowski asked about funding from other agencies. The City Manager responded and indicated other agencies are waiting to see what the City's position is. Director Anderson said that there have been discussions with others, including MnDOT and the school district, about the need for a feasibility study, the cost to be shared. The purpose of including it in this CIP was to determine the Council's interest. The Mayor said the interest is there; the City has always known that there would be a signal at this location; the City should get commitments from other agencies. Director Anderson said 1998 was more realistic given the Right of Way acquisition process. Councilmember Kedrowski supported the parks element and the developer-requested projects. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY GREENFIELD TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS SUBMITTED; WITH LIBRARY REDECORATING AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS TO BE STUDIED FURTHER AS TO TIMING AND FUNDING. Discussion ensued about the estimated tax impact; Director Teschner explained that the 2% tax capacity valuation growth estimate was intentionally conservative. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. C. Consider Approval of Process for Preparation of Revised Zoning Ordinance. - The City Manager reviewed the Staff Agenda Report and the recommendation from the Planning Director. The Mayor asked who might be on such a committee, it would seem the group would need persons who have a distinct background in planning and land use matters. Director Rye suggested representation from the development community, the business communities, and residents, noting that the Planning Commission provides citizen input on such matters, too. The Mayor said that if there is a committee, all members should be residents of Prior Lake and no one should have a current conflict of interest. Councilmember Mader stated that the Planning Commission is a good sounding board, and he questioned whether there was a need for a separate M060396.DOC 12 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 committee; he suggested that the Planning Commission could get the project going. Director Rye explained that the committee would be a sounding board for the Planning Commission which ultimately is charged with the ordinance upkeep and modifications by State Law. He said the issue is how much weight to give a committee. Councilmember Mader said a committee should not be given extra weight over residents. Councilmember Greenfield stated the City has good resources in place including staff and planning commissioners; the hearing process is in place; he questioned the need for special committee. Councilmember Kedrowski asked whether a purpose of the committee was to lessen staff workload for this project. Director Rye responded that was not the purpose; he has had experience with ordinance revision projects where such committees were successfully used to present the interests of stakeholders and to build a sense of ownership in the project among members of the community. The Mayor recounted that the city has had some experience with committees where some members did not always have the greater good of Prior Lake in mind. She said the taxpaying resident should be deciding the standards the City will use; developers and others will have opportunity for input. She said that staff is the best resource and does not have special interests to protect that would be contrary to those of the residents. Councilmember Kedrowski acknowledged the Mayor's comment, but he said there are people in the community who could be tapped, such as former Planning Commission members who could provide good input. Councilmember Greenfield commented how the Comprehensive Plan hearings and process worked; there was substantial input and the end product was completed without a special committee. MOTION BY MADER, SECONDED BY ANDREN TO NOT AUTHORIZE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO PROVIDE INPUT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW ZONING ORDINANCE. Upon a vote being taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Mader and Schenck; nay by Kedrowski, the motion carried. 9. OTHER BUSINESS Councilmember Kedrowski inquired about the City Hall Fountain. The City Manager said that it was on the list of things to do which has given way to the M060396.DOC 13 Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council June 3, 1996 storm damage cleanup activities. He said the pickup project has been going well; he noted that some residents were putting materials other than storm damage products out for pick up. Councilmember Greenfield inquired about the abandoned cement plant on County Road 44. The City Manager said the City needs to obtain a cost estimate from the City Attorney as to the legal process required for condemnation and elimination. Councilmember Kedrowski recalled the County was willing to participate. The City Manager said the ownership has not been interested in voluntarily eliminating the problem. 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS/CORRESPONDENCE 11. ADJOURNMENT The Mayor adjourned meeting at 10:39 p.m. / Recording Sec"feta/y~' ~ M060396.DOC 14