Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-10PC 5380 Cottonwood Ln VAR Doc. No. A 806189 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA �^ Certified Fled and/or Recorded on 08-11-2008 at 11-00 Receipt.-723647 Pat Boeckman, County Recorder 01 Fee- $ 46.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) The undersigned, duly qualified and Planning Secretary for the City of Prior Lake,hereby certifies the attached hereto is the original true and correct copy of RESOLUTION 08-10PC A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW FOR A BUILDING ADDITION ON A PROPERTY IN THE C-5 (BUSINESS PARK) ZONING DISTRICT 'Aal 4r- onme Carlson City of Prior Lake .�` Dated this 23i'd day of July, 2008. ;. (City Seal) EM Product—Variance 08-128 25-296-001-0 5380 Cottonwood Lane Please return document to: City of Prior Lake XAttn: Connie Carlson 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 1'deptworkNank6ri%"copy doc I 0OF PRtp� N t 4646 Dakota Street S.E. u` Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714 "�NESd<P RESOLUTION 08-10PC A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW FOR A BUILDING ADDITION ON A PROPERTY IN THE C-5 (BUSINESS PARK ZONING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. Preston Reynolds is requesting a variance from the front yard setback to allow for a building addition on a commercial property zoned C-5 (Business Park) at the following location, to wit; 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE, Prior Lake, MN 55372 That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Waterfront Passage Addition, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows: 3L5aC`1kD00k0 That part of Lot 1 lying westerly of a line described as: Commencing as the Northeasterly comer of said Lot 1, Block 1; thence North 62 degrees 52 minutes 03 seconds West along the northeasterly line of said Lot 1, Block 1, a distance of 1073.82 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described;thence South 31 degrees 36 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 275.72 feet to the southwesterly of said Lot 1, Block 1, and there terminating. (PID25-296-001-0) 2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for the variance as contained in Case#08-128 and held a hearing thereon on July 14, 2008. 3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The hardship has been created by the expansion of the county highway and did not result from the actions of the property owner. 5. Staff does not believe that increased development or construction costs or economic hardship are the basis of this request. 6. Granting the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but rather is necessary to alleviate an undue hardship due to the shape and size of the lot of record. 7. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to "prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of structures and population by regulating the use of land and buildings and the bulk of buildings in relation to the land surrounding them." This purpose is implemented through required minimum setbacks. The proposed variance will allow the addition to maintain the existing setback on the site. L\08 files\08 variances\em products\appw&Tn 8tion&%e tom 1 Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 8. The granting of the variances will not impact the character and development of the local neighborhood. Many of the buildings along Cottonwood Lane, south County Highway 21 have similar setbacks. 9. Granting of the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or negatively impact public safety. 10. The granting of the variances is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a reasonable use of the property. The nonconformity was created as a result of the reduced setback. 11. The reduced front yard setback is unique to this lot due to the expansion of the highway right-of-way. The applicant has proposed an addition which will maintain the existing setback as the current structure. 12. The exceptional condition of the highway expansion has created the nonconforming setback of 35 feet. To maintain the existing setback the applicant is required to obtain a variance from the front setback. 13. The contents of Planning Case#08-128 are hereby entered into and made a part of the public record and the record of decision for this case. CONCLUSION Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the following variance from the front yard setback to allow for a building addition on a commercial property zoned C-5 (Business Park): • A 15 foot variance from the minimum 50 foot front yard setback required in the C-5 District(Section 1102.1406). The variance is subject to the following conditions: 1. This resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. Proof of recording,along with the acknowledged City Assent Form,shall be submitted to the Community Development& Natural Resources Department prior to the Issuance of a building permit. 2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state agency regulations. Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on July 141 Dan RingstacillActing Commission Chair EST: Danetle Moore, Community Development & Natural Resources Director ]:\08 files\08 variances\em products�approval resohrtion.doc 2