HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 25-05PC - 3160 Spring Lake Rd SW - VAR - T291569ffi[ililnmI
c.rtt'F€d FiLil a,xtld Eod.d d
31412026 9:38 AM
Offica of th. Rcgbtr.r ot Ti0..
Scott ColIrty, llhn..ota
Juke K. Hans,,n, Regig'r ol 7-nt€6
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
coUNTYoFSCOTT )
The undersigned, duly qualified and Planner for the City of Prior Lake, hereby certifies the
attached hereto is the original true and correct copies of
RESOLUTION 25-O5PC
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING VARIANCES FROM THE MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SIDE YARD
SETBACK AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TO ALLOW FOR A DETACHED GARAGE ON A
PROPERTY IN THE R-1 SD (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SHORELAND) ZONING
DISTRICT AT 3160 SPRING LAKE ROAD SW, PRIOR LAKE' MN 55372.
Paul Moretto, City Plarmer
City of Prior Lake
Dated this 72th day of May 2025.
Mailed for filing September 12,2025.
3160 Spring Lake Road SW, Prior Lake, MN 55372
TORRENS
PID 251330400
Return to and drafted bY:
City of Prior Lake
Community and Economic Developmcnt Department
4646Drkota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
R.coipe# 767703
vAR ta6.m
G-SPRING LAKE TO/VNSHIP
2O3A1 FAIRLAWN AVE
PRIOR LAKE MIT 55372
T291569
*26
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake. MN 55372
RESOLUTION 25-OPC
VARIANCES FROM THE MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SIDE YARD SETBACK AND IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE TO ALLOW FOR A DETACHED GARAGE ON A PROPERTY IN THE R-1 SD (LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SHORELAND) ZONING DISTRICT
Motion By: Fenstermacher Seconded by: Johnson
WHEREAS, The Prior Lake Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment, conducted a
public hearing on May 12, 2025, to consider a request from Thanh Bui, the property
owner, requesting a variance from the minimum driveway side yard setback and
maximum impervious surface to allow construction of a double-stall garage on a
property located in the R-1 SD (Low Density Residential Shoreland) Zoning District at
the following property, legally described as:
Lot 1 1, Block 32, Spring Lake Townsite, Scott County, Minnesota' (PlD 251330400)
Address: 3160 Spring Lake Road SW, Prior Lake, MN 55372: and
WHEREAS, Notice of the public hearing on said variance request was duly published in accordance
with the applicable Prior Lake Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Adjustment proceeded to hear all persons interested in this variance
request, and peraons interested were afforded the opportunity to present their views
and objections related to the variance request; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for the variances as contained
in Case #DEV25-OO0OO7 and held a hearing thereon on May 12,2025: and
WHEREAS, The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect ofthe proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anlicipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
ComPrehensive Plan.
NOWTHEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF PRIOR
LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. fhe Board of Adjustment hereby adopts the following findings:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the Zoning Gode.
The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes of the zoning code.
The lurpo# of the Zoning Code is to " Promote the most appropiate and orderly
deveiopment of the residentiit, busrness, industriat, pubtic land, and public areas". The Prior
Lake Zoning Code permits detached accessory structures to be constructed in the side or
rear of a principal structure in residential districts.
Variances shall only be permitted when they are consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
The granting of the variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its goal to
maintain and improve physical character and identity. This is accomplished by achieving
compatible relationships between different types of land uses by utilizing design standards,
appropriate buffers, land use transitions, and high-quality design.
Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance estabtishes that there
are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Code. "Practical difficulties,',
as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means the property owner
proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning
Code, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not
created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential
character of the locality.
Substandard Lot Width and Area: The lot is only 50 feet wide and 7,094 square feet in
area, both of which are below the minimum standards for the shoreland overlay District.
This narrow lot width creates an unusually constrained buildable area, especially when
factoring in required setbacks and existing building footprint.
Existing Development Gonstraints: The home's placement and the required landing at
the front entrance restrict the ability to locate a driveway or garage in a code-complianl
manner without encroaching on setbacks. Additionally, the driveway already exists in tne
proposed location and is not being expanded beyond the current footprint, mitigating any
further impact to the side yard area.
Reasonable use consistent with Neighborhood: The applicant is seeking to construcr a
detached, double-stall garage - a common and reasonable residential improvement that rs
found on many nearby lots. Most homes in the surrounding neighborhood have at least a
double-stall garage.
Reduction in Existing lmpervious surface: Although the requested impervious surface
exceeds the 30% maximum, the proposed plan would reduce the current impervious surface
coverage trom 5o.2o/o to 44.7o/o, moving the property closer to compliance. Alternative
options such as use of the rear alley were reviewed and deemed infeasible due to grading,
drainage, and engineering concerns.
Not self-created: The unique constraints of the property, including the lot size and width,
and location of the existing home were not created by the applicant and predate their
ownership. These factors result from historic platting and development patterns that do not
align with curent zoning standards.
No Alteration to Neighborhood character: The proposed garage would be located in the
rear yard and accessed via an existing driveway, minimizing visual or spatial impact. The
structure is consistent with the residential character and scale of surrounding properties, and
it would not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
Economic considerations alone are not the reason for the varrance requesr.
d.
Based upon the findings set forth herein, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the following
variances to allow the construction of a garage per the proposed survey in the R-1 SD (Low
Density Residential Shoreland) Zoning District:
a. A 5-foot variance from the required minimum driveway side yatd setback. (Subsection 10-
766(b))
b. A variance for imperuious surface from 30% to 44.7%. (Subsection 10-435(5))
The variances are subject to the following conditions of approval:
a. The applicant shall provide a grading plan confirming all stormwater drainage from the
driveway will be managed on their property and no driveway stormwater drainage shall be
directed to the parcel to the east.
b. The variance resolution shall be recorded at Scott County.
c. Building Permit shall be obtained from the Building Department prior to the commencement
of construction.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2025.
VoTE Tschelter Johnson Fenslermacher Tennison Rinostad
Aye E
Nay n
Absent tr
Abstain E
a
tr
o
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
a
a
tr
tr
D
tr
0nity Development Dir6c{or