HomeMy WebLinkAbout_05 04 2026 PCM Agenda_Full Packet
Phone 952.447.9800 / PriorLakeMN.gov
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
Monday, May 4, 2026
City Council Chambers
6:00 p.m.
1. Call Meeting to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of the April 6, 2026, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
4. Public Hearings:
A. PDEV26-000010 – XXXXX Duluth Ave SE – Combined Preliminary and Final Plat and Variance
– Prior Lake Revival LLC is requesting approval of a combined preliminary and final plat to be
known as Prior Lake Revival, consisting of one (1) approximate 1.06 acre parcel for commercial
development and one (1) Outlot consisting of approximately 2.4 acres that will be reserved for
future development. The request also includes a variance from the minimum floor area ratio
requirements to construct a one-story commercial building in the Town Center (TC) zoning district.
(PID: 259021260, 259021250, 259021210 & 259021220)
B. PDEV26-000007 – 14091 Eagle Creek Ave NE – Combined Preliminary and Final Plat – Pulte
Homes of Minnesota LLC is requesting approval of a combined preliminary and final plat for a
development to be known as Marlow Ridge. The applicant is requesting that the existing
approximate 165-acre parcel be subdivided into three Outlots for future development. (PID:
259260010 & 253630040)
5. Old Business:
None.
6. New Business:
None.
7. Adjournment
1
PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Monday, April 6, 2026
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance:
Chair Fleming called the Prior Lake Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners present:
Bryan Fleming, Christian Fenstermacher, Michael Tennison, Sam Rook, Kate Yurko, Shelley Schmokel, and
Daniel Nicholson. Absent: None. Also present: Community Development Director McCabe, Planner Paul Moretto,
Planner Jacob Skluzacek, and Development Service Assistant Sandra Peppin.
2. Approval of Agenda:
MOTION BY TENNISON, SECONDED BY ROOK TO APPROVE THE MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2026, PLANNING
COMMISSION AGENDA.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
3. Approval of Meeting Minutes:
MOTION BY YURKO SECONDED BY ROOK TO APPROVE THE MONDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2026, PRIOR LAKE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
4. Public Hearing:
A. PDEV26-000004 – 17599 Ridgewood Ct SE – Combined Preliminary and Final Plat and Easement Vacation:
Mesenbrink Construction & Engineering is requesting approval of a combined preliminary and final plat to be
known as Ridgewood Court consisting of two single-family lots. The request also includes vacation of an existing
easement adjacent to the property. (PID: 253530030)
Planner Skluzacek: Introduced item 4A as a public hearing and summarized the site characteristics, existing
conditions, and basis for the request to subdivide two previously platted outlots.
Commissioner Comments:
Fleming: Thanked staff for the thorough plans and visuals and requested clarification on the tree preservation,
grading plan, and timing. He asked when the stormwater management report will be reviewed.
Planner Skluzacek: Replied a tree inventory has been submitted showing removal below the City’s 35%
threshold, with an emphasis on preserving mature and heritage trees where possible.
Director McCabe: Explained that stormwater requirements depend on the final home design and impervious
surface area. A formal stormwater management report will be required and reviewed during the building permit
process.
Schmokel: Asked whether the remaining buildable area would accommodate adequately sized homes and
questioned the potential location of a rain garden.
Planner Skluzacek: Confirmed that both lots are buildable and able to accommodate large homes. While no
specific rain garden location has been proposed yet, it would need to be located outside wetland setback areas.
Rook: Asked whether the easement vacation would impact adjacent properties.
Planner Skluzacek: Stated it would not, as the easement is located entirely within the subject property.
Fenstermacher: Asked about drainage and utility easements on outlots.
McCabe: Explained that older plats did not always include the city’s current standard drainage and utility
easements; one of the two outlots does currently include the standard easement and the other does not. The new
plat will include appropriate drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of the lots. The existing easement
is proposed to be vacated because it conflicts with future building pads.
Tennison: Asked for clarification regarding a trail connection.
2
Planner Skluzacek: Indicated that the trail will be required to extend to the north property line to ensure
connectivity, per engineering comments.
Applicant:
Jennifer Haskamp: (Swanson-Haskamp Consulting, 550 Vandalia Street, St. Paul), Addressed the Commission
and provided additional clarification regarding stormwater management coordination with the City Engineer and
tree preservation efforts. She emphasized that the homes will be custom-built, and final layouts will further refine
tree preservation and drainage designs.
MOTION BY FENSTERMACHER, SECONDED BY TENNISON TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 4A
AT 6:18 P.M.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
Public Comment:
Mike Hennessey: (4662 Parkwood Drive SE), Expressed concerns regarding sound abatement and suggested
developing the property as a single lot. He stated that a garage placement could serve as a sound barrier.
Jim Barker: (4665 Parkwood Drive SE), Noted the property has remained vacant for approximately 29 years and
felt the proposal was moving too quickly. He requested consideration of a single-lot option and further evaluation
of wetland impacts.
Fleming: Acknowledged concerns regarding project timing and community impact.
Director McCabe: Explained the ownership history and noted that the size and buildable area of the property
reasonably supports two lots that exceed City standards. He also discussed potential noise mitigation options
available to property owners buyers if they were desired, including fencing and berms, subject to drainage
constraints.
Yurko: Asked whether future noise mitigation would require updated drainage review.
McCabe: Confirmed that any berms would likely require a grading permit which would trigger a review.
Dan Rodgers: (17588 Jett Cir NE), Raised concerns about traffic and pedestrian safety along Ponds Parkway
and proposed driveway locations over the trail.
Anastasiya Riddering: (17620 Jett Cir NE), Echoed safety concerns related to increased driveway access near
the trail.
Director McCabe: Explained that similar driveway access points over trails and sidewalks exist throughout the
city and that the anticipated traffic generation from two homes would be minimal. He also noted planned trail
relocation to provide greater separation distance between the trail and street.
Fenstermacher: Added that parking restrictions along Ponds Parkway could improve sightlines and safety.
MOTION BY ROOK, SECONDED BY YURKO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 4A AT 6:35 P.M.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
MOTION BY YURKO, SECONDED BY TENNISON TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE
EASEMENT VACATION AND COMBINED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR RIDGEWOOD COURT
SUBJECT TO THE COMMENTS LISTED IN THE REPORT AND THE RIDGEWOOD COURT REVIEW
MEMORANDUM DATED 03/26/26.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
B. Amendments – Consider amendments to the Prior Lake City Code Section 10-268, related to motor vehicle sales
uses, allowing motor sales without inventory as a Permitted Use with Conditions and 10-185 Land Use Table.
3
Planner Moretto: Introduced item 4B as a public hearing to consider changes to the Prior Lake Code Section 10-
268, related to motor vehicle sales uses. Moretto explained the history, current circumstances, and the conclusion
for this request. City Staff recommend approval of the proposed amendments to Section 10-268 and Section 10-
185 of the Prior Lake Zoning Code.
Commissioners’ Questions and Comments:
Commissioners discussed scope, clarity of language, zoning implications, and evolving business models. Staff
acknowledged wording refinements and future zoning considerations.
MOTION BY TENNISON, SECONDED BY FENSTERMACHER TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 4B
AT 6:51 P.M.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
Public Comment:
None.
MOTION BY TENNISON, SECONDED BY YURKO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 4B AT 6.52
P.M.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
MOTION BY TENNISON, SECONDED BY ROOK TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH SECTION 10-268 AND SECTION 10-185 OF THE PRIOR LAKE ZONING
CODE.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
5. Old Business:
Director McCabe provided an update on a residential subdivision development application received from Pulte
Homes that will be presented and reviewed at a future meeting.
6. New Business:
None.
7. Announcements & Adjournment:
Announcements:
None.
MOTION BY TENNISON, SECONDED BY ROOK TO ADJOURN THE APRIL 6, 2026, PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING AT 6:55 P.M.
VOTE: Ayes by Fenstermacher, Fleming, Rook, Tennison and Yurko.
Motion carried 5-0.
Respectfully submitted,
Sandra Peppin, Development Services Assistant
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / www.cityofpriorlake.com
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: May 4, 2026
AGENDA #: 4
PREPARED BY: Paul Moretto, Planner
PRESENTED BY: Casey McCabe, Community Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing to Consider a Combined Preliminary and Final Plat for a
Subdivision to be know as Prior Lake Revival and to Consider Approval
of a Resolution Approving a Variance from the Minimum Floor Area Ratio
to Construct a One-Story Commercial Building Located in the Town
Center (TC) Zoning District
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this public hearing is to consider a request from Prior Lake
Revival II LLC for a Combined Preliminary and Final Plat and a variance from
the Minimum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) in the TC, Town Center Zoning Use
District. The variance would allow a one-story commercial building located
along CH21 between Duluth Avenue and West Avenue.
History
On February 27, 2023 the Prior Lake Planning Commission recommended
approval of the preliminary plat and approved a variance for a reduction in the
floor area ratio of a substantially similar project on this site. City Council
reviewed the proposal and approved Resolution 23-53 approving the Prior Lake
Revival Preliminary Plat. The development project did not move forward at that
time.
Stormwater management proved to be very challenging during review of this
project in 2023 due to size limitations of the parcel. The applicant was able to
meet the stormwater rules at that time with onsite storage; however, the
proposed stormwater pond was going to be difficult to access and maintain. The
developer has since acquired the two vacant parcels to the west so the
development team for Revival II spent time reviewing alternatives to the
proposed stormwater plan. The solution was to develop a new stormwater plan
where the ponds would be placed on an adjacent vacant parcel.
Subsection 9-34 of City Code allows for the combination of a preliminary and
final plat in one action due to the simplicity of the proposed subdivision provided:
• The resulting subdivision contains no more than 5 lots.
The resulting subdivision will contain two lots. Lot 1 Block 1 and
Outlot A.
• The proposed subdivision is located in an area where streets and utilities
are in place and capable of serving the subdivision.
Streets and utilities are available and capable of serving the
subdivision.
• The proposed subdivision does not require the dedication or
construction of future streets and will not interfere with the development
of adjacent properties.
The proposed subdivision will access Duluth Avenue through Revival
I and will not require construction of streets or interfere with
development of adjacent property.
• The resulting lots shall conform with all provisions of the Zoning Code
unless a variance has been granted.
The resulting lots will both conform with all provisions of the Zoning
Code and variances.
Current Circumstances
The following paragraphs outline the physical characteristics of the existing site,
the comprehensive plan and zoning designations, and a description of some of
the specifics of the site.
PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Total Site Area: The total site area is 3.76 acres which is proposed to be
subdivided into two lots of approximately 1.05 acres, Lot 1, Block 1, and 2.41
acres, Outlot A, Block 1.
Topography: This area has relatively level topography, with elevations ranging
from the 936’ MSL in the northwestern corner to a high point of 966’ MSL in the
southwestern portion of the site above the retaining wall.
Access: Access to the site will be from Duluth Avenue through a private parking
lot east of the property. An ingress and egress easement is in place to allow
access through the parking lot to Duluth Avenue SW.
2040 Comprehensive Plan Designation: This property is designated for Town
Center Land Uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
Zoning: The site is zoned TC, Town Center.
PROPOSED PLAN
Commercial Development: The development plan calls for a single 10,910
square foot commercial building which will be occupied by three or four
businesses. Exterior building elevations with varying colors and material types
including glass, masonry, and architectural cement board. Awnings and varying
wall heights as well as wall breaks are also proposed in accordance with the
City Code.
Materials: Section 10-705 establishes the design requirements for buildings in
the TC zoning district. The materials for the proposed building meet the TC
requirements for buildings not located on Main Avenue or Dakota Street.
Frontage Requirement (%) Proposed (%)
Public ROW 50 50
Rear/Side 35 42 (east) | 46 (west) | 43 (south)
Building Setbacks: The developer does not request any modification to the re-
quired TC, Town Center Zoning District building setbacks:
Landscaping: The landscaping plan identifies 23 overstory trees as well as
various shrubs and landscape beds in accordance with the City Code. The lot
has been surveyed for significant trees with none found on property.
Sanitary Sewer / Water Mains: Sanitary sewer and watermains will be
extended from the private parking lot east of the site.
Grading / Storm water: The site will be graded so that the storm water drainage
is directed to a storm water basin on outlot A to meet the City’s water quality
and runoff requirements. The basin will pretreat the stormwater runoff of the
development prior to flowing into the area wetlands.
Fees and Assessments: This development will be subject to the standard
development fees including park dedication and trunk utility service charges.
Variance: Subsection 10-637 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance details the
Dimensional Standards which apply to the TC, Town Center Use District. The
TC District has a minimum floor area ratio of 0.5. The applicant is proposing to
construct a one-story commercial building and is requesting a variance from the
minimum floor area ratio. The property has a lot area of 46,021 square feet and
the applicant is proposing to construct an 10,910-square foot building for a total
floor area ratio of 0.23.
Section 10-906 states that the Board of Adjustment may grant a variance from
the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, provided:
There are practical difficulties in complying with the strict terms of the
Ordinance. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the
granting of a Variance, means the property owner proposes to use the
property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
This property is a unique Town Center property because of its location away
from the core downtown area. This property is not located near municipal off-
street parking lots and on-street parking is not available in the immediate area.
A second story would increase the floor area ratio; however, a second story
would also require additional off-street parking, which is not possible due to
insufficient land area. The property will be used in a reasonable manner.
The granting of the Variance is in harmony with the general purposes and
intent of the City Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances and the
Comprehensive Plan.
The granting of the variances appears to be in harmony with the general
purposes of the Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. A purpose of the Zoning
Ordinance to “Promote the most appropriate and orderly development of the
residential, business, industrial, public land, and public areas” and “enhance the
Setbacks Required
Minimum
(TC Zoning)
Proposed
Front None 15.3’
Side 0’ 10.1’
Rear 0’ 137.2’
aesthetic character and appearance of the City.” The proposed building design
will fit with the surrounding residential and commercial properties and enhance
the aesthetic character and appearance of the downtown area.
The practical difficulty is due to circumstances unique to the property not
resulting from actions of the owners of the property and is not a mere
convenience to the property owner and applicant.
This property is a unique Town Center property because of its location away
from the core downtown area, the lack of nearby on-street and municipal
parking, and its proximity to residential properties.
The granting of the variances will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood or be detrimental to the health and safety of the public
welfare.
The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood as the subject property is zoned TC, Town Center Use District
and construction of a commercial building is an appropriate use for this property.
The granting of the Variances will not result in allowing any use of the
property that is not permitted in the zoning district where the subject
property is located.
The proposed construction of a commercial building is an allowed use within
the TC, Town Center Zoning Use District.
Conclusion
City staff recommends a motion and a second to recommend approval of the
request for Combined Preliminary and Final Plat to City Council and approval
of a variance of 0.23 to the FAR for the construction of a commercial retail
building with conditions.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Motion and a second to recommend the City Council approve the Combined
Preliminary and Final Plat for Prior Lake Revival subject to the comments
listed in this report and the Revival Review Memorandum dated 3/26/26 and
a motion and a second the approve the variance to the Floor Area Ratio to
0.23.
2. Motion and a second to recommend the City Council deny the Combined
Preliminary and Final Plat request based upon findings of fact and a motion
to deny the variance to the Floor Area Ratio based on findings of fact.
3. Motion and a second to table this item to a future Planning Commission
meeting and provide the applicant with direction or any combination of
approval or denial.
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
Alternative #1
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map
2. Narrative
3. Preliminary/Final Plat
4. Civil Plan
5. Landscaping Plan
6. Resolution 26-01
7. Revival II Review Memorandum and Plan Set 4/22/26
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ROCHESTER OFFICE WINONA OFFICE ST. LOUIS PARK OFFICE
3003 43rd Street NW, Ste 103 74 Kansas Street 4806 Park Glen Road
Rochester, MN 55901 Winona, MN 55987 St. Louis Park, MN 55416
www.Karkela.com
NARRATIVE
Project: Revival II
Date: April 14, 2026
Project Overview:
In the summer of 2026, we plan to develop and new professional building at the site located
at Hwy 21 and Duluth Avenue SE. The site has been selected to continue the vision of the
Revival Development. Revival II Is the second phase of the Revival Development. Revival
II includes the construction of a 10,910 SF multi-tenant building that will include two dental
specialists (Endodontic & Oral Surgery Group) and two remaining commercial tenant
spaces available to rent by other professionals.
The property is currently an empty lot. Building will be placed/constructed per the submitted
site plan. Parking lot will continue on from original Revival I Parking lot
Storm water management is address in Storm water Narrative.
The building was design to compliment the Revival I building using similar exterior finishes
of complimentary colors. Building will be constructed using a combination of engineered
wood shake siding, Engineered wood vertical board and batten, Masonry brick and Masonry
Architectural cast Stone Base. Design intent is shown on submitted elevations. Design team
has worked within the City parameters of zoning requirements and design standards
Building is being financed by the Revival Development Team. Developer originally planned
to previously construct Phase II and put project on hold due to rising interest rates and other
obstacles. The team is now in position to complete Phase II and hopefully consider a Phase
III development in the near future.
Project Team:
Owner/Developer
Contact: Matt Schafer – 952-210-8542
Prior Lake Revival II
14476 Shady Beach Trail NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Architect
Tanek Architects
Contact: Nathaniel Shea – 612-998-8200
118 E 26th Street
Suite
Minneapolis, MN
Structural Engineer
Contact: Dave Wagner – 715-426-4930
A.M. Engineer
112 East Maple Street
River Falls, WI 54022
Civil Engineer/Surveyor:
Contact: Nick Adams – 651-337-6729
3440 Federal Drive
Suite 110
Eagan, MN 55122
Contractor
Karkela Construction
Contact: Katie Korogi 612-968-5881
4806 Park Glen Road
St Louis Park, MN 55416
’
N
SEE SCHEDULE ON SHEET L2.0
EXISTING BUILDING
PROPOSED BUILDING
EX. TREES
TO REMAIN
ADJACENT PROPERTY
EX. LANDSCAPE
TO REMAIN
TURF SOD TO DISTURBED LIMITS
IRRIGATION TO EASEMENT LINE.
TURF
SOD
TURF
SOD
TURF
SOD
TURF SOD
TURF SOD TO DISTURBED
LIMITS, FIELD VERIFY
ROCK MULCH FROM BOTTOM
OF WALL TO BACK OF CURB
TURF SOD & IRRIGATION
TO PROPERTY LINE
TURF SOD TO DISTURBED
LIMITS, FIELD VERIFY
PROPERTY LINE
18" ROCK MAINT.
STRIP. SEE SHEET L2.0
ROCK MULCH &
EDGER PER NOTES
ROCK MULCH
PER NOTES
ROCK MULCH
PER NOTES
ROCK MULCH
PER NOTES
PATIO PER
CIVIL PLANS
PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS
1
Gd
6
Ck6
Ck
EXISTING DENSE
TREES TO REMAIN
EXISTING SCREEN
FENCE
RETAINING WALL
PER CIVIL
EXISTING ELECTRICAL
TRANSFORMER
EASEMENT
EXISTING SAFETY
FENCE
EDGER PER NOTES, TYP.
EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN
STAPLE SOD
ON 3:1 SLOPES
STAPLE SOD
ON SLOPE.
TURF SOD TO DISTURBED LIMITS
IRRIGATION TO EASEMENT LINE.
SIDEWALKS PER CIVIL PLANS
EXISTING WALL
STAPLE SOD
ON SLOPE.
1
BF
TURF SOD
4
Ck
2
Dt
1
BF
EXISTING DENSE
TREES TO REMAIN
TURF SOD TO
ROCK MULCH PER NOTES
WALL PER CIVIL PLANS
ROCK MULCH FROM BACK OF WALL
TO FACE OF EXISTING FENCE.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
AREA TO REMAIN
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
AREA TO REMAIN
SEE SHEET L2.0
EROSION CONTROL
PER CIVIL PLANS
TURF
SOD
NATIVE SEED BEYOND
PROP. LINE TO DISTURBED
EXTENTS. FIELD VERIFY.
LANDSCAPE EDGER PER NOTES
CONSTRUCTION FENCE
PER CIVIL PLANS
LIVE PLUG PLANTS
NATIVE SEED MIX
LANDSCAPE
EDGER, TYP.
ACCENT BOULDERS
SEE SHEET L2.0
6
Sa
8
Ck
1
JW
1
JW
10
Ck
3
PD
2
BF
4
Ho
6
Ck
1
Sa
4
Ck
4
Ch
2
Ch
12
Ho
4
Ck
1
Sa
3
Ch
4
Ch
8
Ck
4
PP2
12
Ci
3
Sm
9
Ph
4
QN
2
BJ
3
BJ
18" ROCK MAINT.
STRIP. SEE SHEET L2.0
4" SINGLE-SHRED HARDWOOD
MULCH WITH NO WEED MAT.
ADD PREEN TOPDRESS.
PROP. LINE
LANDSCAPE EDGER PER NOTES
EXISTING SCREEN
FENCE
SEE SHEET L2.0
EROSION CONTROL
PER CIVIL PLANS
NATIVE SEED MIX
SEE SHEET L2.0
EROSION CONTROL
PER CIVIL PLANS
NATIVE SEED MIX
ROCK MULCH
PER NOTES
TURF SOD
ROCK MULCH
PER NOTES
L1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN
1. Refer to Architect's Site Plan for additional information.
2. See Civil Engineer's plans for grading, utilities and pertinent site information.
3. Contractor to coordinate all work in the city right-of-way with Scott County & City
of Prior Lake Public Works Departments.
4. Protect existing trees to remain from damage during construction.
5. Place a minimum of 6" imported topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction,
to be seeded or sodded (including right-of-way boulevards) unless specified otherwise.
Tree and Shrub planting areas to receive a minimum 24" depth imported planting soil.
6. Refer to Sheet L2.0 for Landscape Details and Notes.
General Notes:
landscape plan
I hereby certify that this plan,
specification or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly licensed landscape architect
under the laws of the state of Minnesota.
MN license number
datename
118 E. 26th Street
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55404
P:612-879-8225
F:612-879-8152
owner
landscape architect
signature
48084
Benjamin D. Hartberg, PLA
Revival II
16XXX Duluth Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN
03/20/2026
DESIGN GROUP
Landscape Architecture | Planning
475 Cleveland Avenue N | Suite 101A
St. Paul, MN 55104
telephone: 651.788.9018
internet: www.calyxdesigngroup.com
Revival II, LLC
13875 Hwy 13 South Front
Rd #100
Savage, MN 55378
project
copyright Tanek 2026
Landscape Symbols Legend
Proposed Rock Mulch, See Sheet L2.0
Proposed Turf Sod, See Sheet L2.0
1 Tree per 40' of Site Perimeter
·894' / 40' = 22 Trees Required
·23 Trees Proposed
14 Deciduous Trees
09 Coniferous Trees
Mitigation Tree Inches
·0 Trees to be Removed
·0 Mitigation Trees Required
Municipal Landscape Calculations:
Live Plug Plants Per Schedule, See Sheet L2.0
Buffer Requirements: Screen New Parking Lot Adjacent to Residential
·Existing Fences & Retaining Wall to Remain
Entry and Foundation Landscaping
·Foundation Landscape Plantings Required
·Foundation Landscape Plantings Proposed
Native Seed Mix Per Schedule, See Sheet L2.0
03/20/26 City Submittal
L2.0
1. Refer to Architect's Site Plan for additional information.
2. See Civil Engineer's plans for grading, utilities and pertinent site information.
3. Contractor to coordinate all work in the city right-of-way with Scott County & City
of Prior Lake Public Works Departments.
4. Protect existing trees to remain from damage during construction.
5. Place a minimum of 6" imported topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction,
to be seeded or sodded (including right-of-way boulevards) unless specified otherwise.
Tree and Shrub planting areas to receive a minimum 24" depth imported planting soil.
General Notes:
landscape details
I hereby certify that this plan,
specification or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly licensed landscape architect
under the laws of the state of Minnesota.
MN license number
datename
118 E. 26th Street
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55404
P:612-879-8225
F:612-879-8152
owner
landscape architect
signature
48084
Benjamin D. Hartberg, PLA
Revival II
16XXX Duluth Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN
03/20/2026
DESIGN GROUP
Landscape Architecture | Planning
475 Cleveland Avenue N | Suite 101A
St. Paul, MN 55104
telephone: 651.788.9018
internet: www.calyxdesigngroup.com
Revival II, LLC
13875 Hwy 13 South Front
Rd #100
Savage, MN 55378
project
copyright Tanek 2026
Landscape Notes:
1'-6" (MIN.)
4"
FACE OF WALL OR BACK OF CURB.
1/8" THICK BLACK STEEL EDGER
3 OZ. FILTER FABRIC, TURN-UP
FINISHED GRADE
PITCH SUB-GRADE TO DRAIN AWAY
FROM BUILDING WALLS & CURBS.
MULCH PER NOTES
NOTES: SEE PLAN FOR CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION.
ROCK STRIP WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLAN.
WITH STAKES EVERY 18" (MIN). RYERSON INDUSTRIES
OR EQUAL.
AT EDGES, OVERLAP SEAMS 4".
SEE PLANS
WIDTHS MAY VARY
DO NOT MOUND OR OVER-FILL ROCK AREAS
NOT TO SCALE
TYP. MULCH & MAINTENANCE STRIP DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION1
2
5
TOMAHAWK TREE STABILIZER STAKES.
MINIMUM (2) PER TREE.
SOD
ROOT BALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED
MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES
PLANTING SOIL - SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES
TOPSOIL
SUBGRADE
OTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN
CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED
HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED
PLACE ROOT BALL SO THAT BASAL
FLARE IS 1" ABOVE SURROUNDING
CONTACT WITH TRUNK.
NOTE:
SUBGRADE, REMOVE BURLAP
DRAIN SYSTEM IS NECESSARY
4" DIAMETER AUGERED HOLE,
42" MIN. DEPTH. FILLED W/ 3/4"
DIAMETER DRAIN ROCK. COVER
W/ 6" FILTER FABRIC.
FOR HEAVY CLAY SOILS.
FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL
GRADE.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
ENSURING THE TREES ARE IN A PLUMB
POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY
PERIOD.
TR
E
E
H
E
I
G
H
T
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
D
F
R
O
M
T
O
P
O
F
R
O
O
T
B
A
L
L
T
O
B
A
S
E
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
L
E
A
D
E
R
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
.......
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
...
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN
WIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6
INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM.
3'' DEPTH WATERING BASIN
PREPARED PLANTING SOIL BED
MULCH, PER NOTES.
FINISHED GRADE
PLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED
PLANTING LOCATIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF REDUCED HOLE
WIDTH.
NOT TO SCALE
TYP. SHRUB & PERENNIAL PLANTING3
NATIVE SEEDING INSTALLATION METHOD:
Drop Seeding Onto Tilled Sites
This is the "standard" method for seeding on prepared sites such as those on
construction projects.
a)Site Preparation: The site should be prepared by loosening topsoil to a minimum
depth of 3 inches.
b)Fertilizer: Use a fertilizer analysis based on a soil test or a general
recommendation is a 10-10-10 (NPK) commercial grade analysis at 200 lbs/acre.
c)Seed Installation: Seed should be installed with a drop seeder that will
accurately meter the types of seed to be planted, keep all seeds uniformly mixed
during the seeding and contain drop seed tubes for seed placement
(Brillion-type). The drop seeder should be equipped with a cultipacker assembly
to ensure seed-to-soil contact.
d)Seeding Rates: Rates are specified in the mixture tabulation for the specified
mix.
e)Packing: If the drop seeder is not equipped with a cultipacker, the site should be
cultipacked following the seeding to ensure seed-to-soil contact.
f)Mulch: Cover soil with a hydromulch consisting of natural wood fiber or paper
fiber, water, and M-Binder at 100 lbs per acre.
Note: Heavy equipment is not allowed in the infiltration basins to keep soils from getting
compacted. If any compaction occurs due to seeding operations, the soils must be
uncompacted.
NATIVE SEED MAINTENANCE:
Native Grass and Forb Mixtures (mixtures beginning with the number 3)
Year 1
Establishment (spring seeding):
1)Prepare site - Late April - May
2)Seed - May 1 - June 1
Maintenance:
1)Mow (6-8 inches) - every 30 days after planting until September 30.
2)Weed Control - mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spray thistles,
etc.
Establishment (fall seeding):
1)Prepare site - Late August - early September
2)Seed - late September to freeze-up
Maintenance (following season):
1)Mow (6-8 inches) - once in May, June, and July
2)Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc.
Evaluation:
1)Cover crop growing within 2 weeks of planting (except dormant plantings).
2)Seedlings spaced 1-6 inches apart in drill rows.
3)Native grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches tall.
4)If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow as necessary.
Year 2
Maintenance:
1)Mow (6-8 inches) one time between June 1 - August 15 before weeds set seed.
2)Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc.
3)Some sites may not require much maintenance the second year.
Evaluation:
1)Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat was used in a fall planting.
2)Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, but still short.
3)Some flowers should be blooming (black-eyed Susans, bergamot, etc.).
4)If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow site.
Year 3
Maintenance:
1)Mow only if necessary.
2)Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc.
3)Sites usually do not require much maintenance the third year.
Evaluation:
1)Planting should begin looking like a prairie - tall grasses, flowers, etc.
Long-term
Maintenance:
1)Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc.
2)Burning (3-5 year rotation) alternate spring and fall if possible.
3)Haying (3-5 year rotation) late summer or early fall. Alternate with burning (may
substitute for burning).
4)Burning two years in a row will really "clean up" rough-looking sites.
NATIVE SEED MIX:
Seed in the Stormwater Management areas: (unless otherwise noted on civil plans), shall be:
MnDOT #33-261 'Stormwater South & West', worked into the topsoil layer at 35 lbs per acre. Submit
seed mix for approval. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications.
Maintenance per MnDOT Seeding Standards:
1. Landscape contractor to provide nursery pull list (bill of lading) including plant species and sizes shipped to the site. Additionally, the
landscape contractor shall provide nursery stock traceability, proving none of the materials provided contain or are genetic strains of the
neonicotinoid family including acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, nithiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam.
2. Refer to civil plan sheets for grading, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities & erosion control.
3. All plant material shall comply with the latest edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of
Nurserymen. Unless noted otherwise, deciduous shrubs shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be
delivered as specified. All deciduous trees are measured at 48" from finished grade to determine tree diameter (DBH). All coniferous
trees are measured from finished grade to the top of the central leader. If no central leader is present on coniferous trees, that plant is
rejected and must be replaced immediately.
4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist.
5. All proposed plants shall be placed as close to the location(s) indicated on the plan as possible. Contact the landscape architect if
discrepancies arise during plant installation that require deviating location(s) from those shown on the plans.
6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide
field approval. Significant changes may require city review and approval.
7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and properly handling all plant materials brought on the site
both before and after installation. Schedule plant deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours.
8. All plant materials shall be fertilized upon installation as specified.
9. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant
material growth requirements.
10. If the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other
site condition that might negatively affect plant establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of
the landscape architect & client prior to bid submission. Plant bed drainage concerns during plant installation shall be brought to the
attention of the Owner and General Contractor immediately.
11. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and
around the building site.
12. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material for the duration of the plant warranty, with the
exception of turf sod, which shall be maintained for 30 days after installation or until the first mowing, whichever comes first. Contractor
must bag clippings from initial mowing and remove from the job site. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to warranty
start shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with O&M information, including (but not limited to),
written instructions on proper lawn mowing height, yearly lawn maintenance recommendations, proper plant pruning information, plant &
lawn fertilization schedule, and disease/pest control.
13. The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the date punch list review. Plants that exhibit
more than 30% die-back damage shall be replaced at no additional cost to the owner.
14. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications
may be requested by the city based on applicant information, public input, council decisions, etc.
15. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the
work process.
16. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field.
17. Irrigation: The landscape contractor shall furnish a complete irrigation layout plan for review. Design for head-to-head coverage of all
landscaped areas. Include underground sleeve locations, irrigation connection location within the building, and locations of all heads,
lateral lines, main lines, valves, & controls. Include a wired rain sensor per state plumbing code. Include all interior building irrigation
equipment required for operation, including deduct water meter, backflow device, controller, boiler drain(s), pressure gauges, etc.
18. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off-site
during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately.
19. All plant beds and trees located outside of plant bed limits to receive Single Shred Hardwood mulch to a depth of 4-inches. Wood
mulch tree rings per details. Submit mulch sample for Owner approval. Top dress wood mulch areas with Preen pre-emergent granule to
prevent emergent weeds.
20. Edger to be 18 GA Plated Finish Perforated Edger, Coyote or Equal. Stake every 18" minimum. Submit sample for approval.
21. All planting areas shall be prepared prior to installation activities with clean, imported loam topsoil. Provide a firm planting bed free of
stones, sticks, construction debris, etc.
22. The Landscape Contractor shall furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation.
23. The Landscape Contractor shall clear and grub the underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash,
weeds and foreign materials.
24. The landscape contractor shall contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations.
25. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to
the satisfaction of the municipal staff. This includes silt curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape.
26. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for visiting the site to become familiar with the conditions prior to bidding and
installation. Coordinate with the general contractors on matters such as fine grading, landscaped area conditions, staging areas,
irrigation connection to building, etc.
27. Construction materials, stockpiles, equipment, and vehicles shall not be stored or operated on city boulevards without written
permission from the city. Restore disturbed areas off-site to original condition.
28. All sub-cut areas of the site that are designated on the site plan as open space for landscape shall be graded with either stockpiled or
imported pulverized topsoil. Slope away from building. See note 29 below.
29. Landscape contractor must prove the open sub-grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimum
requirement of 1/4-inch of water per hour prior to installation of plant materials, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas
not capable of meeting this requirement shall have 4" diameter X 48" depth holes augured every 36" on-center and filled with MnDOT
Free-Draining Coarse Filter Aggregate. Re-test sub-grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement.
30. Fencing (if noted) per Architect's Plans and Specifications.
31.Grind or excavate existing stumps (if present) to 30" below grade & backfill with imported topsoil.
32. Rock Mulch: Where noted on the plans, rock mulch shall be 3" depth of .75" dia. clean Dresser Trap rock over 3oz, needle-punch
free-draining landscape weed mat. Overlap seams 6" and staple every 16" on-center.
33. Landscape Contractor and Excavator shall be responsible for providing 6" depth topsoil under turf areas, 18" depth topsoil in plant
beds and 24" in tree pits. See civil engineer's plans for grading, erosion control, and final grade elevations.
34. Accent Boulders: Where shown on Sheet L1.0, the landscape contractor shall furnish and install Gray Trap Boulders, approx.
30"X30", 36"X36", or similar based on supply availabilty. Hand place & set into hillside around plants as shown. Minimum 10 boulders to
be included in bid. Contact Rock Hard Landscape Supply for quotation.
PERENNIAL PLANT
EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN.
MULCH PER NOTES.
PLANTING SOIL PER NOTES.
CONTRACTOR PREPARED SUBGRADE
NOTE:
HAND-LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED
PLANT MATERIALS.
NOT TO SCALE
TYP. PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL4
03/20/26 City Submittal
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY
EVERGREEN TREES
JW Juniperus scopulorum 'Wichita Blue'Dwarf Cedar 6` Hgt.B&B 2
PD Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 6` Hgt.B&B 3
PP2 Pinus cembra Swiss Stone Pine 6` Hgt.B&B 4
OVERSTORY TREE
BF Betula platyphylla `Fargo` TM Dakota Pinnacle White Birch 2.5" Cal.B&B 4
BJ Betula platyphylla 'Jefpark'Parkland Pillar® Asian White Birch 2" Cal.B&B 5
Gd Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Draves' TM Street Keeper Honey Locust 2.5" Cal.B&B 1
QN Quercus robur x bicolor 'Nadler'Kindred Spirit® Oak 2" Cal.B&B 4
SHRUBS
Ch Cornus hessei 'UMN970507'Garden Glow™ Dogwood 2 gal.Pot 13
Ci Cornus sericea 'Isanti'Isanti Red Twig Dogwood 5 gal.B&B 12
Dt Deschampsia cespitosa Tufted Hair Grass 1 gal.Pot 2
Ph Pinus sylvestris 'Hillside Creeper'Hillside Creeper Scotch Pine 5 gal.Pot 9
Sa Spiraea x bumalda `Anthony Waterer`Anthony Waterer Spiraea 3 gal.Pot 8
Sm Syringa meyeri `Palibin`Dwarf Korean Lilac 3 gal.Pot 3
ANNUALS/PERENNIALS
Ho Hemerocallis x `Stella de Oro`Stella de Oro Daylily 1 gal.Pot 16
GRASSES
Ck Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 56
PLANT SCHEDULE
DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING.
PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT
LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. SOME
INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE
PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL
BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF
THE CROWN.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO
KEEP TREE STRAIGHT AND PLUM.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6" WHITE
PVC TRUNK GUARD AT TIME OF PLANTING.
MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE
NURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE
NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE.
SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO
GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY
DRAINING SOILS.
EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE
TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT
BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT
VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE
TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.
4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF
ROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY).
REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAP
FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL
IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL,
CUT THE WIRE BASKET OFF AND REMOVE. DISPOSE OFF OFF-SITE.
PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. ENSURE
NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEE
PLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLEND
SOIL ( EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL ) PER
NOTES.
TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT
PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.
WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN
CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN
THE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTER
PLANTING.
MULCH RING 4 FT. DIA. MINIMUM
6 FT. DIA. PREFERRED
NOTES:
TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS:
-REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM THE
TOP-HALF OF THE ROOT BALL AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE.
-REMOVE THE WIRE BASKET DOWN TO THE SECOND
HORIZONTAL WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM AND DISPOSE OF
OFF-SITE.
-EXPOSE ROOT FLARE AND SET AT GRADE
NEW PLANT HOLES PASS THE REQUIRED INFILTRATION TEST.
DOUBLE STAKE WITH 1" POLYPROPYLENE WEBBING
THROUGH THE EYE OF THE CINCH-TIE RUBBER
SUPPORT. AVOID DAMAGE TO THE ROOT BALL WITH
SUPPORT STAKES.
NURSERY GRADE FIBERGLASS TREE STAKES, 11
16" X 6'-0"
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREE
WATERING BAGS AT ALL NEW TREES OUTSIDE OF
THE IRRIGATION COVERAGE.
PLUGFLATRiver BullrushBolboschoenus fluviatius
RootSizeCommon NameScientific Name
(Provide a random
and equal mixture
of the plants listed)
PLUGFLAT
Tussock SedgeCarex stricta
PLUGFLATWooley SedgeCarex pellita
PLUGFLATBebb's SedgeCarex bebbi
PLUGFLAT
Blue Joint GrassCalamagrostis canadensis
PLUGFLATBottle Brush SedgeCarex comosa
PLUGFLATLake SedgeCarex lacustris
PLUGFLAT
Fox SedgeCarex vulpinoidea
PLUGFLATCommon RushJuncus effusus
PLUGFLATGreen BulrushScirpus atrovirens
PLUGFLAT
Cord GrassSpartina pectinata PLUGFLAT
WoolgrassScirpus cyperinus
24" On-Center
Plug Spacing:
*Contractor is to evenly distribute the allocated amount of prairie plugs throughout the basin areas located within
the site accordingly. Plant substitutions are allowed based on material availability.
BASIN BOTTOM LIVE PLUG SCHEDULE:
1
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RESOLUTION 26-01 PC
VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO FOR A PROPERTY
IN THE TC (TOWN CENTER) ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, The Prior Lake Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment, conducted a
public hearing on May 4, 2026, to consider a request from Prior Lake Revival LLC, the
property owner, to approve a variance to allow the construction of a one-story
commercial building on a property located in the TC (Town Center) Zoning District at
the following property:
See attached schedule A.
WHEREAS, Notice of the public hearing on said variance requests was duly published in
accordance with the applicable Prior Lake Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Adjustment proceeded to hear all persons interested in these variance
requests, and persons interested were afforded the opportunity to present their views
and objections related to the variance requests; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for the variances as contained
in Case #DEV26-000011 and held a hearing thereon on May 4, 2026; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variances on the
Comprehensive Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF PRIOR
LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. The Board of Adjustment hereby adopts the following findings:
a. There are practical difficulties in complying with the strict terms of the Ordinance.
“Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a Variance, means the
property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitt ed by
the Zoning Ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical
difficulties.
This property is a unique Town Center property because of its location away from the core
downtown area. This property is not located near municipal off-street parking lots and on-street
parking is not available in the immediate area.
2
A second story would increase the floor area ratio; however, a second story would also require
additional off-street parking, which is not possible due to insufficient land area. The property will
be used in a reasonable manner.
b. The granting of the Variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the
City Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan.
The granting of the variances appears to be in harmony with the general purposes of the
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. A purpose of the Zoning Ordinance to “Promote the most
appropriate and orderly development of the residential, business, industrial, public land, and
public areas” and “enhance the aesthetic character and appearance of the City.” The proposed
building design will fit with the surrounding residential and commercial properties and enhance
the aesthetic character and appearance of the downtown area.
c. The practical difficulty is due to circumstances unique to the property not resulting from
actions of the owners of the property and is not a mere convenience to the property
owner and applicant.
This property is a unique Town Center property because of its location away from the core
downtown area, the lack of nearby on-street and municipal parking, and its proximity to
residential properties.
d. The granting of the variances will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood
or be detrimental to the health and safety of the public welfare.
The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood as the
subject property is zoned TC, Town Center Use District and construction of a commercial
building is an appropriate use for this property.
e. The granting of the Variances will not result in allowing any use of the property that is
not permitted in the zoning district where the subject property is located.
The proposed construction of a commercial building is an allowed use within the TC, Town
Center Zoning Use District.
f. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
Economic considerations alone are not the reason for the variance request.
3. Based upon the findings set forth herein, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the following
variances to allow the construction of retaining walls per the proposed survey in the TC (Town
Center) Zoning District:
a. A 0.27 variance from the required minimum 0.5 floor area ratio of a building in the TC
(Town Center) Zoning District.
4. The variances are subject to the following conditions of approval:
a. The variance resolution shall be recorded at Scott County.
b. All comments and conditions in the Revival II Review Memorandum dated 4/22/26 shall be
addressed to the City’s Public Works Director’s, or their designee’s, satisfaction.
3
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF MAY 2026.
_______________________________
Bryan Fleming, Commission Chair
ATTEST: _________________________________
Casey McCabe, Community Development Director
VOTE Fleming Fenstermacher Tennison Yurko Rook
Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
PRIOR LAKE REVIVAL
Scott County, Minnesota
That part of Government Lot One (1), Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Fourteen (114), Range
Twenty-two (22), Scott County, Minnesota, together with that part of the Northeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter (NE 1/4 of NW 1/4) of said Section 2, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 2, West Side Addition to Prior Lake; thence
North along the northerly extension of the West line of said Lot 9 a distance of 369.4 feet to the center
line of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad; thence Southeasterly along said center line to its
intersection with the northerly extension of the East line of Lot 7, Block 2; thence South along said
extension a distance of 322.5 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 7; thence West along the North
line of Block 2 to the point of beginning;
Together with:
A tract commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 14, Block 2, West Side Addition to Prior Lake;
thence North along the northerly extension of the West line of said Lot 14 a distance of 526.25 feet to
the center line of said railroad; thence Southeasterly along said center line to its intersection with the
northerly extension of the East line of Lot 10, Block 2; thence South along said extension a distance of
369.4 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 10; thence West along the North line of Block 2 to the
point of beginning;
Together with:
A tract beginning at a point on the North line of Block 2, West Side Addition to Prior Lake, distant
100.0 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; thence East along said North line 150.0 feet to the
Northeast corner of Lot 10; thence North along the extension of the East line of said Lot 10 a distance
of 116.5 feet; thence West parallel with said North line 150.0 feet; thence South 116.05 feet to the
point of beginning;
Together with:
A tract commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 14, Block 2, West Side Addition to Prior Lake;
thence North along the northerly extension of the West line thereof 100.0 feet; thence East 100.0 feet;
thence South 100.0 feet; thence West 100.0 feet to the point of beginning;
Together with:
The North 16.5 feet of the tract above described beginning at a point 100.0 feet East of the Northwest
corner of Block 2, West Side Addition to Prior Lake;
5
Together with:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE 1/4 of NW 1/4), Section 2, Township
114, Range 22, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 5, Block 2, Westside Addition to Prior Lake; thence West
100.0 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 6; thence North along the extension of the dividing line
between Lots 6 and 7 a distance of 268.0 feet, more or less, to the South right-of-way line of said
railroad; thence Southeasterly along said right-of-way line 103.5 feet; thence South 242.0 feet, more or
less, to the point of beginning;
Together with:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE 1/4 of NW 1/4), Section 2, Township
114, Range 22, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 2, Westside Addition to Prior Lake; thence West
100.0 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 4; thence North along the extension of the dividing line
between Lots 4 and 5 a distance of 241.7 feet to the South right-of-way line of said railroad; thence
Southeasterly along said right-of-way line 103.5 feet; thence South 215.0 feet to the point of
beginning.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the North 50.0 feet for railroad right-of-way where previously
excepted.
[Phone] 952-447-9800 | [Fax] 952-447-4245 | cityofpriorlake.com
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Memorandum
To: Nick Monserud, City Engineer
Luke Schwarz, Assistant City Engineer
Stephanie Thulien, Project Engineer
From: Laura Pietila, Project Engineer
Kris Keller, Project Engineer
Date: April 22, 2026
Re: Revival II – Site Plan Review
We have reviewed the revised civil plans submitted for the Revival II site dated March 30, 2026 as
prepared by Rehder & Associates. The following documents were reviewed:
• Civil Plan Set - 03 CIVIL SET_CITY SUBMITTAL_3-30-26.pdf
• Stormwater Management Plan - 03 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT_3-30-26.pdf
Comments are provided within this Memorandum and in the corresponding redlined plan set. Please
note that not all comments within the plan set are in the Memorandum. We have the following
comments with regards to stormwater management and engineering:
General
1. Submit for and provide copies to the City of all required permits from regulatory agencies (Scott
County, MCES, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, NPDES,
etc.)
2. Additional comments may be generated by PLSLWD’s review of the revised plans.
3. Additional comments may be generated by Scott County’s review of the revised plans.
4. Plans shall be signed by an engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota.
5. Provide a location map/title page/plan sheet index
6. Additional redline comments are provided in the accompanying plan set. Provide a response to
all comments in this memo and the redlined plan set.
7.
Existing Conditions/Demolition Plans
1. No comments
Site Plan/Grading Plan
1. Provide a restoration plan including tree removal and preservation.
2. The basin slopes are 3:1. Revise to be a maximum of 4:1.
3. Add a construction limit line.
4. Show the maintenance access route to the basin and OCS that meets width and slope
requirements.
5. Call out the outlet elevation and HWL for all basins shown on the plan.
6. Label the parking lot EOFs.
7. Provide easements over the stormwater infrastructure.
8. Provide additional slope labels along curb lines and across the parking areas
9. Identify sections of tipout curb
10. Provide additional contours and spot elevations showing drainage getting out and away from
the existing building to the east
Utility Plans
1. Provide ownership and maintenance agreements defining responsibilities for sanitary sewer and
water utilities in the future.
2. Storm Sewer
a. Submit storm sewer drainage calculations.
b. The minimum pipe size shall be 15”.
c. FES must be RCP.
d. Use the MnDOT standard detail for riprap.
e. Install marking signs adjacent to storm sewer structures in the green space (see City Plate
#103).
f. Label the OCS structure.
Details
1. Maximum 8 City detail plates per sheet
Stormwater Management
1. HydroCAD Model
a. Update the HydroCAD model drainage area and impervious acreage to match the
SWMP/plans.
b. Revise the rainfall depths to match the design manual (2-yr = 2.84”, 10-yr = 4.22”, 100-yr =
7.39”).
c. Label the small drainage area on the existing drainage area map south of CSAH 21 or merge
to combine with 3S.
2. Basin Design
a. Modify the EOF of the pond so it is 1’ higher than the HWL.
b. Modify the top of berm so it is 2’ higher than the HWL.
c. Provide pretreatment meeting MN Stormwater Manual requirements.
d. Revise the basin berm side slopes to be a maximum of 4:1.
e. Revise the top of the basin berm to be 10’ wide.
f. Add cleanouts at draintile bends.
g. Line the basin due to the presence of groundwater.
3. Provide water quality calculations showing 60% TP and 90% TSS removal.
4. Freeboard
a. Provide 2’ of freeboard between the building and the parking lot EOF.
SWPPP
1. Specify who will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the stormwater management
system. If the basin will be privately owned, provide a maintenance plan and agreement.
2. Provide double silt fence adjacent to the wetland.
Scott County
1. Any work within the County right-of-way shall require a County permit.
2. Additional comments may be generated by Scott County’s review of the revised plans
PLSLWD
1. Additional comments may be generated by PLSLWD’s review of the revised plans
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / www.cityofpriorlake.com
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: May 4, 2026
AGENDA #: 4B
PREPARED BY: Casey McCabe, Community Development Director
PRESENTED BY: Casey McCabe
AGENDA ITEM: Consider a Recommendation of Approval for a Combined Preliminary and
Final Plat to be known as Marlow Ridge
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this agenda item is to consider the combined preliminary and
final plat to be known as Marlow Ridge which, if approved, would create three
separate outlots on a current agricultural parcel owned by Vierling Family
Limited Partnership located southeast of the CH42/CH21 intersection (PID
259260010).
Background
Pulte Homes has submitted several subdivision and zoning applications related
to a proposed 262-unit residential subdivision to be known as Marlow Ridge. In
the near future, the planning commission and city council will be asked to
consider applications related to preliminary plat, preliminary Planned Unit
Development (PUD) plan, comprehensive land use plan amendment, rezoning,
easement vacation, and environmental assessment for the low- and medium-
density residential subdivision. This agenda item represents the first of several
steps and if approved, would establish three separate outlots for future
development.
As a first step in the development process, the applicant is requesting to
subdivide the entire parcel to create three outlots. An outlot is a property or a
parcel which is platted but not intended for immediate development. An outlot
is not buildable and no building permits will be issued for an outlot until future
preliminary and final plat approvals are provided by the city.
Subsection 9-34 of City Code allows for the combination of a preliminary and
final plat in one action due to the simplicity of the proposed subdivision provided:
➢ The resulting subdivision contains no more than 5 lots.
The resulting subdivision will contain three lots.
➢ The proposed subdivision is located in an area where streets and utilities
are in place and capable of serving the subdivision.
Streets and utilities are available and capable of serving the
subdivision. Streets and utilities will be extended in the future as part of
future development phases.
➢ The proposed subdivision does not require the dedication or
construction of future streets and will not interfere with the development
of adjacent properties.
The proposed subdivision does not require the dedication or
construction of streets, as the subdivision will create three
undevelopable outlots. Future phases of development will dedicate
the necessary street right-of-way. The development of adjacent
properties will not be impacted by this subdivision.
➢ The resulting lots shall conform with all provisions of the Zoning Code
unless a variance has been granted.
The resulting lots will conform with provisions of the Zoning Code.
Current Circumstances
The proposed subdivision would subdivide the existing ± 165-acre property into
three separate outlot parcels which will allow Pulte Homes to pursue subdivision
and development applications for the outlot they proposed to purchase. No
development plans are being considered or will be approved as a result of this
combined preliminary and final plat application.
Outlot A is proposed to be approximately 22.5 acres and is guided for Business
Office Park use; Vierling Family Limited Partnership will retain Outlot A for future
development. Outlot B is approximately 87.7 acres and is guided for a mix of
low- and medium density residential development; Pulte Homes is planning to
acquire Outlot B for residential development purposes. Outlot C is a riparian
parcel containing approximately 55 acres and is planned for future low-density
residential development; Vierling Family Limited Partnership will retain Outlot A
for future development.
The following paragraphs outline the physical characteristics of the existing site,
the comprehensive plan and zoning designations, as well as descriptions of
some of the site specifics.
PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Total Site Area: The total site area is approximately 165.2 acres. If approved,
the Marlow Ridge subdivision would create Outlot A (22.5 acres), Outlot B (87.7
acres) and Outlot C (55 acres).
Wetlands: Wetlands exist throughout the property and any potential wetland
impacts will be evaluated and addressed through future preliminary and final
platting of the outlots. The owner/developer will be required to enter into a
Developer’s Agreement with the Prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed District for
the establishment and recording of a Declaration of Conservation Easement
over the wetland buffer area as a condition of approval during future preliminary
and final platting of the outlots.
Access: Access is available from Carriage Hills Parkway NE and an extension
of Fountain Hills Drive NE, which will be completed by the developer during a
future phase of development.
2040 Comprehensive Plan Designation: This property is guided for a mix of
Business Office Park, Urban Low Density Residential and Urban Medium
Density Residential on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. An
application has been submitted for future planning commission and city council
consideration which would amend the city’s land use plan to reallocate the
commercial and residential uses on the subject property. That request, which
will be considered at a later date, would guide the property north of Fountain
Hills for Business Office Park uses, the property between Fountain Hills and
Carriage Hills for low- and medium density residential uses, and the property
south of Carriage Hills for low-density residential.
Zoning: The property includes several zoning use districts including low density
residential, neighborhood commercial, high density residential and business
park. An application for rezoning the property to match the land use plan
guidance has been submitted and will be considered at a future meeting.
Parks / Trails: Trails currently exist along CH21 and Carriage Hills Parkway.
Additional sidewalks and trails will be incorporated during future phases of
development. No additional parkland is being requested by the City in this area.
Sanitary Sewer / Water Mains: Sanitary sewer and water service are available
to serve this area.
Storm Water Management: Future development phases will address
stormwater management requirements.
Conclusion
Attached to this report is a copy of the proposed site plan for Marlow Ridge. The
proposed development plans are currently being reviewed by city staff and other
agencies and will be presented to the planning commission and city council at
a later date. The planning commission is not being asked to review or approve
the site plan at this point as the development plans will be presented and
reviewed during an upcoming public hearing. The proposed plan is merely
provided to offer some context to the current request for combined preliminary
and final plat approval for the three outlot subdivision.
City staff recommends approval of the request for combined preliminary and
final plat based on the following conditions:
1) A signature block for Vierling Family Limited Partnership shall be added to
the final plat as a property owner.
2) City Attorney plat examination signature on the final plat is not required and
shall be removed.
3) Future phases of development and final plats of the Outlots shall not be
approved until the applicant and Prior Lake – Spring Lake Watershed
District reach agreement on the required conservation easements over the
wetlands and buffer areas.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Motion and a second to recommend the City Council approve the Combined
Preliminary and Final Plat for Marlow Ridge subject to the conditions
outlined in this report.
2. Motion and a second to recommend the City Council deny the Combined
Preliminary and Final Plat for Marlow Ridge. based upon findings of fact.
3. Motion and a second to table this item to a future Planning Commission
meeting and provide the applicant with direction.
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
Alternative #1
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map
2. Marlow Ridge Final Plat
3. Marlow Ridge Site Plan
MARLOW RIDGE
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property situated in the
County of Scott, State of Minnesota, to wit:
The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of NW1/4) of Section Twenty-six (26), Township One Hundred Fifteen (115), Range Twenty-two (22), Scott County,
Minnesota.
The South Half of the Northwest Quarter (South 1/2 of NW 1/4) of Section Twenty-six (26), Township One Hundred Fifteen (115), Range Twenty-two (22), Scott County,
Minnesota, except the East 250.00 feet of the North 522.75 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section Twenty-six (26), Township One Hundred Fifteen
(115), Range Twenty-two (22), Scott County, Minnesota ,
and
Government Lot 2, Section Twenty-six (26), Township One Hundred Fifteen (115), Range Twenty-two (22), Scott County, Minnesota ,
and
All that part of Outlot A, Fountain Hills Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of said Outlot A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 30 minutes 04 seconds East; along the south line of said Outlot A, a
distance of 36.00 feet, to the east line of the west 36.00 feet of said Outlot A; thence North 01 degrees 20 minutes 14 seconds West, along said east line of the west 36.00 feet, a
distance of 555.16 feet; thence North 68 degrees 48 minutes 19 seconds West, a distance of 28.15 feet, to the east line of the west 10.00 feet of said Outlot A, thence North 01
degrees 20 minutes 14 seconds West along said east line of the west 10.00 feet, a distance of 502.15 feet; thence South 88 degree 39 minutes 46 seconds West, a distance of
10.00 feet, to the west line of said Outlot A; thence South 01 degrees 20 minutes 14 seconds East, along said west line of Outlot A, a distance of 1067.57 feet, to the point of
beginning.
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as MARLOW RIDGE and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and also dedicate
the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only.
In witness whereof said Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability Company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _________ day of
_____________________, 20_____.
________________________________________, Chief Manager
Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ____________________
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______ by James Tharp, Chief Manager of Pulte Homes of Minnesota
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Notary Public, __________________ County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires __________________________
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I Daniel Ekrem hereby certify that this plat MARLOW RIDGE was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota;
that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat
have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate
are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
Dated this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______.
_________________________________________
Daniel Ekrem
Licensed Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 57366
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF _____________________
The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______, by
Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor.
________________________________________
________________________________________
Notary Public, ___________________________
My Commission Expires __________________
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
This plat was approved by the City Council of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______, and hereby certifies compliance with
all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2.
By:___________________________________________________________________
Mayor Clerk
I hereby certify that I have examined this plat of MARLOW RIDGE and do hereby recommend this plat for approval as to form this ______________ day of _____________________,
20______.
By: _______________________________
Prior Lake City Attorney
SCOTT COUNTY SURVEYOR
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 389.09, Subd. 1, as amended, this plat has been reviewed and approved this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______.
_________________________________
Scott County Surveyor
SCOTT COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER
I hereby certify that the current and delinquent taxes on the lands described within are paid and the transfer is entered this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______.
By: _______________________________
Deputy
SCOTT COUNTY RECORDER
I hereby certify that this plat was recorded in the office of the County Recorder for record on this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______, at _____ o'clock ___.M.
as Document Number ___________________ .
_________________________________
Scott County Recorder
C.R. 42 (140TH ST NW)
C.
R
.
2
1
(E
A
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V
E
N
E
)
N89°15'23"W 1341.01
N0
0
°
3
5
'
4
3
"
W
28
7
.
5
8
N89°45'25"W 1046.44
N0
0
°
1
3
'
0
5
"
W
8
2
0
.
7
3
N89°44'10"E 2649.63
S0
0
°
5
3
'
5
9
"
E
2
7
3
4
.
1
6
N0
0
°
3
5
'
4
3
"
W
5
5
5
.
1
6
N68°03'48"W
28.15
N0
0
°
3
5
'
4
3
"
W
5
0
2
.
1
5
S89°24'17"W
10.00
N89°45'25"W
250.01
N0
0
°
1
3
'
0
5
"
W
52
2
.
7
7
N89°38'16"E 1291.61
N89°24'17"E
9.11
R =3 4 0 .0 0
L =3 0 1 .4 9
Δ =5 0 °4 8 '2 1 "
R =3 1 0 .0 0
L =2 8 3 .8 2
Δ =5 2 °2 7 '2 2 "S88°56'42"E 849.09
105.12
45
0
.
0
4
S0
0
°
1
4
'
3
7
"
E
1
7
5
0
.
0
0
S0
0
°
3
7
'
4
7
"
W
1
7
2
5
.
0
0
CARRIAGE HILLS PKWY CARRIAGE HILLS PKWY
127±
100±
11
5
1
.
6
4
15
8
2
.
5
2
S88°29'40"W 1265.63
N0
0
°
1
3
'
0
5
"
W
-
-
-
82
0
.
7
3
--- S89°44'10"W
2649.63
S0
0
°
1
4
'
3
7
"
E
--
-
1
7
5
0
.
0
0
N89°38'16"E 1291.61 ---
MARLOW RIDGE
16
5
.
7
9
28.15
N68°03'48"W
N0
0
°
3
5
'
4
3
"
W
5
0
2
.
1
5
10.00
S89°24'17"W
Δ
Δ
OUTLOT A
C.R. 42 (140TH ST NW)
C.
R
.
2
1
(E
A
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V
E
)
N89°15'23"W 1341.01
S0
0
°
5
3
'
5
9
"
E
1
1
5
1
.
6
4
N0
0
°
3
5
'
4
3
"
W
2
8
7
.
5
8
Δ
10
5
.
1
2
N0
0
°
3
5
'
4
3
"
W
N89°24'17"E
9.11
R =3 4 0 .0 0 L =3 0 1 .4 9 Δ =5 0 °4 8 '2 1 "
R =3 1 0 .0 0 L =2 8 3 .8 2 Δ =5 2 °2 7'2 2 "
S88°56'42"E 849.09
758.8990.20
12
1
.
7
9
N0
3
°
2
3
'
4
5
"
E
4
3
8
.
3
1
R=2
2
8
4
3.31
L=2
7
8.2
7
Δ=0
°
41'
5
3
"
C.Br
g=S
3
°
0
2
'
4
8
"
W
C
.=2
7
8.2
7
N0
3
°
2
3
'
4
5
"
E
3
1
4
.
1
7
S87°36'17"E 388.62
R=5 8 2 9.5 8 L =315.8 3 Δ=3 °0 6 '15 "N89°17'29"E 279.57 N89°17'29"E 190.97
MARLOW RIDGE
INSET A
N89°45'25"W 1046.44
--- 741.62 ---
N89°45'25"W 250.01
N0
0
°
1
3
'
0
5
"
W
5
2
2
.
7
7
N86°32'21"E 994.00
R=861.95 L=178.02
=11°50'00"
S77°27'
3
9
"
E
2
4
8
.
3
9
R=1472.72L=175.26Δ=6°49'06"
S84°16'45"E 258.
2
5
25.27
N74°42'21"E
OUTLOT B
S89°24'17"W
9.11
R =3 4 0 .0 0 L =3 0 1 .4 9 Δ =5 0 °4 8 '2 1 "
R =3 1 0 .0 0 L =2 8 3 .8 2 Δ =5 2 °2 7 '2 2 "
N88°56'42"W 849.09
758.8990.20
--
-
S
0
0
°
5
3
'
5
9
"
E
1
5
8
2
.
5
2
-
-
-
--- N89°44'10"E 2649.63 ---
N0
0
°
1
3
'
0
5
"
W
8
2
0
.
7
3
N0
0
°
3
5
'
4
3
"
W
4
5
0
.
0
4
CARRIAGE HILLS PKWY
CARRIAGE HILLS PKWY
715.77
1192.24
90
.
1
4
--
-
7
3
0
.
5
9
-
-
-
C.
R
.
2
1
(E
A
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V
E
)
R=2
2
8
4
3
.
3
1
L
=
5
5
2
.
0
4
Δ=1°
2
3
'
0
5
"
C
.
B
r
g=S
0
°
12
'
0
3
"
E
C
.=5
5
2
.
0
2
R=2
2
8
4
3.
31
L=8
7
9
.
6
2
Δ=2
°12
'
2
3
"
C.B
r
g=S
1°
3
5
'
41"
W
C.=8
7
9
.
5
6
N00°53'35"W
38.66
10.00
--
-
N
0
0
°
1
3
'
0
5
"
W
7
3
0
.
5
9
--- S89°45'25"E 250.01
LOT 2
BLOCK 1
N0
0
°
3
5
'
4
3
"
W
-
-
-
55
5
.
1
6
LOT 2
BLOCK 1
S89°45'25"E
1046.44 ---
MARLOW RIDGE INSET B
N8
9
°
3
8
'
1
6
"
E
1
2
9
1
.
6
1
OUTLOT C
S00°14'37"E 1750.00
S00°37'47"W 1725.00
127±
100±
S8
8
°
2
9
'
4
0
"
W
1
2
6
5
.
6
3
MARLOW RIDGE
INSET C
VIEW A
VIEW D
VIEW C VIEW B
C.
R
.
2
1
(E
A
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V
E
N
E
)
C.
R
.
2
1
(E
A
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V
E
N
E
)
CARRIAGE
H
I
L
L
S
P
W
K
Y
P
I
K
E
L
A
K
E
T
R
A
I
L
N
E
FOU
N
T
A
I
N
H
I
L
L
S
D
R
N
E
FOUNTAIN
HILLS DR
(PUB
L
I
C
)
(P
U
B
L
I
C
)
(PUBLIC)
(P
U
B
L
I
C
)
WL4
WL1
SU
R
R
E
Y
LA
N
E
N
E
CA
R
R
I
A
G
E
LA
N
E
N
E
CO
A
C
H
M
A
N
LA
N
E
WL1
4
7
8
9
1011
29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22
182019
13
14
8
9
22
23
26
27
28
29
46
45
44
43
42 41 40 39
38
6
5
4
3
2
1
17
18
35
33
30
34
2
192021
17
16
15
7
6
5
4
24
23
22
678
1
1615
12
11
2
1
3
6
5 3
2
1
4
7
8
9
10
234
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
25
26
27
28
5
4
37
36
13
14
29
30
31
32
33
34
19
20
3
21
6
5
35
36
37
38 1
2
3
4
5
6
1
127891011 13 14 15 16
3
2
1
12
11
10
BL
O
C
K
1
BL
O
C
K
2
B
L
O
C
K
3
B
L
O
C
K
6
BLO
C
K
6
BLOCK 7
BL
O
C
K
5
BLOCK 4
B
L
O
C
K
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
BLOCK 8
1 2 3 4 5 6
BLOCK 9
1 2 3 4 5 6
BLOCK 10123456
BLOCK 11
1 2 3 4 5 6
BLOCK 1
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
BLOCK 13123456
BLOCK 14123456
BLOCK 15
123456
BLOCK 16 1234
BLOCK 17
1234
BLOCK 1
8
123456
BLOCK 1
9
1234
BLOCK 20
123456
BLOCK 21
123456
BLOCK 22
1234BLOCK
2
3
1
2
3
4 BLO
C
K
2
4
1
2
3
4 BL
O
C
K
2
5
8
7
9111012
15
14
13
16
31
32
24
25
17 18
1
BLOCK 26
CA
R
R
I
A
G
E
L
A
N
E
N
E
COACHMAN LANE NE
CO
A
C
H
M
A
N
L
A
N
E
N
E
FOUNTAIN HILLS DRIVE NE
RO
A
D
A
ROAD B
ROAD B
ROAD
C
R
O
A
D
D
R
O
A
D
D
ROAD E
ROAD
F
R
O
A
D
F
ROAD G
S
U
R
R
E
Y
L
A
N
E
N
E
S
U
R
R
E
Y
L
A
N
E
N
E
OUTLOT D
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT E
OUTLOT
F
OUTLOT E
O
U
T
L
O
T
G
OUTLOT H
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT I
OUTLOT H
BLOCK 2
BL
O
C
K
2
BLOCK 1
BL
O
C
K
6
BL
O
C
K
1
B
L
O
C
K
2
OUTLOT G
OL E
OUTLOT A
S
U
R
R
E
Y
L
A
N
E
N
E
S
U
R
R
E
Y
L
A
N
E
N
E
4.373 ac
www.alliant-inc.com
PROJECT TEAM DATA
QA/QC CHECK
DateBy
CERTIFICATION
Date License no.
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Project No.:
Drafted By:
Designed By:
Sheet of Fi
l
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
X:
\
2
0
2
2
\
2
2
0
1
8
9
-
V
i
e
r
l
i
n
g
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
S
I
T
E
.
d
w
g
P
l
o
t
t
e
d
B
y
:
Be
n
P
a
l
a
z
z
o
l
o
o
n
Ma
r
c
h
2
,
2
0
2
6
a
t
1:
4
5
:
1
2
P
M
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
R Dial 811
FOR
R
E
V
I
E
W
O
N
L
Y
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
Ci
t
y
S
u
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
3-
2
-
2
0
2
6
Pr
i
o
r
L
a
k
e
,
Mi
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
P
l
a
t
S
u
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
Ma
r
l
o
w
R
i
d
g
e
Si
t
e
P
l
a
n
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
Ben Palazzolo
61668
MPR, BJP
BJP, DJB, ELL
222-0189-00
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional
Civil Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
19 70
190
SCALE IN FEET
60 120 240
N
SITE PLAN DATA:
PID: 259260010 177.06 AC
PROPOSED ROW (CARRIAGE HILL PKWY)2.04 AC
PROPOSED ROW (EAGLE CREEK AVE NE)9.59 AC
PROPOSED ROW (FOUNTAIN HILLS DRIVE NE)15.28 AC
PROPOSED ROW (140TH ST NW)0.01 AC
PROPOSED BLOCK 26, LOT 1 27.76 AC
PROPOSED BLOCK 27, LOT 1 55.02 AC
OUTLOT A 18.68 AC
OUTLOT B 0.60 AC
OUTLOT H 2.43 AC
OUTLOT I 0.57 AC
WETLAND 4 (OUTLOT A)11.87 AC *
* SEE WETLAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS
SITE PLAN LOT DATA:
4 UNIT TOWNHOME:
LOT WIDTH MINIMUM:24 FT
LOT DEPTH MINIMUM:76.5 FT
6 UNIT TOWNHOME:
LOT WIDTH MINIMUM:24 FT
LOT DEPTH MINIMUM:76.5 FT
TWINHOME:
LOT WIDTH MINIMUM:83 FT (100.5 FT TO ROW)
LOT DEPTH MINIMUM:125 FT
SIDE YARD SETBACK:7.5 FT
MID SINGLE FAMILY LOTS:
LOT WIDTH MINIMUM:65 FT (82.5 FT TO ROW)
LOT DEPTH MINIMUM:125 FT
SIDE YARD SETBACK:7.5 FT
LARGE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS:
LOT WIDTH MINIMUM:75 FT (97.5 FT TO ROW)
LOT DEPTH MINIMUM:125 FT
SIDE YARD SETBACK:7.5 FT
NOTES:
ALL TOWNHOMES:
MINIMUM BUILDING SEPARATION:20 FT
ALL:
FRONT YARD SETBACK: 25 FT
REAR YARD SETBACK: 25 FT *
SIDE YARD SETBACK: 7.5 FT (25 FT TO ROW) **
(SF AND TWINHOMES LOTS)
*30 FT REAR YARD SETBACK ADJACENT TO PIKE LAKE TRAIL NE
*30 FT REAR YARD SETBACK ADJACENT TO CARRIAGE HILL PKWY
**50 FT SIDE YARD SETBACK ADJACENT TO EAGLE CREEK AVE NE
LOT TYPE BREAKDOWN:
TOWNHOMES 96
TWINHOMES 80
MID 65' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 47
BLOCK 1, LOTS 22-29
BLOCK 2, LOTS 18-30, 32-46
BLOCK 3, LOTS 1-11
LARGE 75' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 39
BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-21
BLOCK 2, LOTS 1-17, 31
TOTAL UNITS 262
OUTLOT OWNER
OUTLOT WITH PONDS/WETLANDS: A, B, H, I CITY
OUTLOT: C, D, E, F, G HOA/DEVELOPER
SITE PLAN OUTLOT DATA:
SITE NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 24 FOR TYPICAL LOT DETAILS AND TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS.
LEGEND:
EASEMENT LINE
BUILDING SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
LOT LINE
ROW
STREET SIGN
STREET LIGHT
WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND BUFFER BOUNDARY MONUMENT