HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/15/05
. 4'-PRiO~~\
;:.~ ~\
I t ~ \, 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
'U rrll Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
I
\. A_ ~t> /'
"<~lVNES~"
-~-
MINUTES OF THE LAKE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
March 15, 2005
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Lake Advisory Committee (LAC) Meeting was called to order at 6:00
P.M. Members present: Harry Alcorn, Brad Beneke, Dan O'Keefe and Donna
Mankowski. Members absent: Marv Mirsch
Others present: Shannon Lotthammer, Prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed
District, Larry Poppler; Assistant City Engineer
II. CONSIDER APPROVAL MEETING MINUTES
No minutes for February
III. NEW BUSINESS
a. Aquatic Plant Management Plan
Lotthammer distributed a copy of the aquatic plant management plan for
Upper Prior Lake. An aquatic plant inventory was performed and based on
the results a management plan was developed. Plant goals were discussed at a
previous public meeting and input from tonight's presentation will be adopted
into the plan.
Eurasian watermilfoil is a non-native plant which is dominant in Upper
Prior Lake. Part of the goal is to manage the non-native plants including
curlyleafpondweed and Eurasian watermilfoil to provide a more diverse
aquatic plant community.
Part of the management plan is to provide education on aquatic plant
management. A couple of items which would be part of the education
would include:
. Beach Treatment - When people treat their beaches for weeds,
many times in the areas that they are not using, the exotic species
move in and become more prevalent. Educating people that they
should only treat the areas that they use as a swimming beach
would be part of the education goals.
www.cityofPfiorlake.com
Phone 952.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245
. Role of Aauatic Plants in Water Oualitv - Aquatic plants help
provide better water quality by using phosphorus. If this
phosphorus is not utilized by aquatic plants it will be utilized by
algae.
. Permits - Shoreline residents must get a DNR permit for treating
aquatic plants. Many residents currently are not aware that they
need a permit for beach treatment.
. Shoreline Restoration - The Watershed District is working with
residents to promote shoreline restoration. Workshops are planned
to as a promotional tool.
Another part of the goal of the management plan is to increase
emergent aquatic plan vegetation. Emergent vegetation helps to
reduce erosion by dampening the effects of wave action along the
shoreline.
Improvement ofthe diversity of the aquatic plants is another goal.
Improvement of water quality will increase the growth of aquatic
plants. While this is improvement in water quality, lake users may
perceive that the management plan is not working.
Monitoring the aquatic plants and carp population will be part of the
management plan.
The LAC discussed imposing a permit for shoreline improvements. Funding
and staffing resources must be identified if such a permit were considered.
..
Lotthammer gave a brief update of the outlet channel. The outlet design for
the Jeffers Area is almost complete. The construction will happen in the late
fall or winter. Design for the outlet channel north of County Road 16 would
be next as development pressure is pushing that part of the project. The
segment of the outlet channel from County Road 42 to Pike Lake would be
after that. The outlet structure is almost completely designed. Currently the
Watershed District is working with the landowner on a few issues. The
construction could happen in the winter of 2005 or more likely in the winter of
2006.
b. Lake Access I Docks
Poppler stated that since the Watershed District discussion extended further
than originally planned, that this item be reviewed at the next LAC meeting.
c. Capital Improvement Program
Poppler stated the Operating Budget is where the LAC could receive
additional funding for surveys or other items. The Operating Budget will be
2
reviewed in the fall. Poppler reviewed the Capital Improvement Program
items. The attached summary sheet shows the items funded through the
Water Quality Fund in the Capital Improvement Program.
IV. OLD BUSINESS
a. Marketing Ideas - Public Relations - Implementation
O'Keefe mentioned that he has spoken with the bass clubs and there is not
enough interest in the carp tournament. The carp spawning dates do not work
for the clubs.
Poppler stated that he has spoken to the commercial fisherman he is not
interested in taking the carp during that time period. Poppler has also spoken
to the DNR and while they think it is a good idea for the lake, they prefer that
the carp is harvested for a purpose and not simply disposed.
O'Keefe stated that without a place to get rid of the carp, at this point the carp
tournament does not look good.
V. ANNOUNCEMENTS
None
VI. ADJOURNMENT
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 8:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Larry Poppler
Assistant City Engineer
3
5. Aquatic Plant Goals
· An overall aquatic plant goal is to increase native plant distribution to 40% of the lake area. To
accomplish this, water clarity minimums should be 4 to 5 feet so plant growth with colonize out 8-10
feet of water depth. A map showing what 40% coverage would cover is shown in Figure 19.
· Information and Education materials should be prepared. Educate lake and watershed residents about
value of aquatic plants. Also make information available that explains the potential for increased
plant growth if water clarity improves. Explain rules for herbicide use and ramifications of treating
with the wrong chemical.
· Increase the shoreline coverage of emergent plants. Currently three parcels have emergent plant
growth. The goal is 10 to 20% of the parcels which would represent 35 to 70 parcels out of 366
parcels with emergent plant growth.
· Increase diversity of submerged native plants to 3 to 5 species. This is still a relatively low diversity
but would be a realistic goal for Upper Prior Lake.
· With an increase in clarity, there may be a need to manage nuisance growth of Eurasian watermilfoil.
Nuisance growth should be defined and then a management policy should be developed.
464000mE.
,....._~
-'
z
E
o
o
'0
N
Li1
'"
...
z
TN;vrN
11%0
4 64000m E,
o
o lOCO fHl Il
f=-=J '-
:ro
Figure 19. A theoretical 40 % coverage of native plants is shown in green shading. This is in contrast to
existing native plant coverage as shown in Figure 17. Currently there is about 1 % coverage of native plants.
Milfoil and curly leaf, both exotic plants, cover up to about 25 % of the lake bottom.
Upper Prior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
27
6. Aquatic Plant Projects
-,
~
A range of aquatic plant management options were initially selected from lakes with aquatic
plant management programs and with conditions similar to Upper Prior Lake. From these
options, the best aquatic plant projects were selected for Upper Prior Lake. Five project areas
were selected and are described in the next few pages. The five project areas were:
A. Education
B. Monitoring and Information Gathering
C. Roughfish Management
D. Native Plant Management
E. Exotic Plant Management
A. Education
Existing Programs: Information and education (I & E) materials have been prepared and
distributed by the PUSL WD for over 20 years. For this I & E program, materials specific to
aquatic plant management would be prepared.
Management Plan: The PUSL WD would oversee preparation of one or two newsletters or
newsletter inserts per year that pertain to aquatic plants. Areas to emphasize include the
following:
1. Why aquatic plants are important.
2. How they might expand if water clarity improves.
3. What lake residents can do to manage aquatic plants in their shoreland area.
4. Explanation of rules and regulations pertaining to herbicide use.
('
B. MonitoringlInformation Gathering
Existing Programs: Water quality is monitored on an annual basis and aquatic plant and fish
surveys have been conducted in the past as well.
Management Plan: Two components that should be evaluated with more detail are the aquatic
plant status and the roughfish population status.
Aouatic Plant Survevs: Conduct aquatic plant surveys every three years, or as needed in Upper
Prior Lake to check progress of native plant distribution. An early summer survey will
characterize curlyleaf pondweed as well as native plants. The late summer survey will
characterize Eurasian watermilfoil as well as native plants.
CarD Survev: Standard MnDNR fish surveys do not always reflect the population status of
roughfish like carp. However determining the composition and abundance of the roughfish
community has been a challenge. New techniques need to be tested and this is a vital area with
ramifications and potential benefits for other lakes in the Watershed District. Survey techniques
that could be tested in addition to standard trapnet and gill net surveys include flowing trapnets,
~
I
Upper Prior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
28
t~
. It!'
pop-up nets, and baited long-lines.
c. Roughfish Management
Management Plan: If carp survey results indicate excessive numbers of roughfish are present,
then it is recommended to reduce roughfish numbers. It is assumed that if the roughfish pressure
on suppressing native plants is removed, the existing aquatic plant seed bank will produce the
new plants necessary to meet the native plant goals. Roughfish management has two strategies:
the use of carp barriers and the use of various techniques to remove carp.
Carp Barriers: Where opportunities present themselves, carp barriers should be installed to
prevent migration of carp to prime spawning habitat. One area to check is on the northwest side
of Upper Prior. A variety of carp barriers have been installed around the state. One of the
simplest is a metal grate that fits over a culvert. They can be designed to allow debris to pass
through but still hold back most of the migrating carp.
Roughflsh Removal: Two existing roughfish removal techniques are well established and
include fish traps and seining. These techniques could be augmented with other techniques such
as flowing trapnets, pop-up nets, and long-lines. The Watershed District would work closely
with MnDNR fisheries on specific allowable techniques.
D. Native Plant Management
Emergent Plants: Emergent plants are scarce at the present time. Factors that are limiting
growth are probably roughfish activities, lack of light penetration due to algae blooms, and
lakeside residents removing vegetation. Reestablishing emergent plants probably will not
succeed unless the major limiting factors are removed.
Submersed Plants: Submersed native plants are scarce at the present time. The two primary
factors limiting submersed plants are probably lack of adequate light penetration and roughfish
impacts.
Management Plan: Characterize existing fish community (see Topics Band C for more
information). Prepare educational materials for lake residents that address the significance of
emergent and submersed native plants. Begin to establish new emergent plant stands when
roughfish numbers are reduced. Monitor, map, and protect any new occurrence of native plant
beds.
E. Exotic Plant Management
Curlyleaf pondweed: Curlyleaf pondweed does not exhibit the nuisance level of growth in
Upper Prior that has been observed in the past in Spring Lake. In Upper Prior Lake, curlyleaf
Upper Prior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
29
growth is at a light nuisance level and is in shallow water, restricted to nearshore areas. At the n
present time curlyleaf does not impose a significant water quality problem with a die back.
Lake sediment analysis indicates there is a low potential for future nuisance curlyleaf growth to
occur.
Management Plan: It is not anticipated that curlyleaf pondweed will be a significant nuisance.
For curlyleaf growth out to 150 feet from shore, management responsibilities are up to the
lakeside property owner. Currently, as of 2004, 11 permits have been issued representing 3.5
acres of the littoral zone. The PUSL WD does not have an active management need at this time,
since curlyleaf is not a significant nutrient source and therefore not a serious water quality
problem. However plant surveys should occur every two to three years.
t. '"~
~~
"in",,, <c,.,. " "i
," """ ~ 'i'l- ::J
)
Figure 20. Crystal Lake: an example of a lake with heavy nuisance growth of curlyleaf pond weed (picture
taken in 2003).
Eurasian watermilfoil: Eurasian watermilfoil is widely distributed throughout Upper Prior Lake
in water depths of six feet or less. Eurasian watermilfoil will grow to the lake surface in spots,
but does not profusely branch and its distribution pattern is patchy. As of 2004, Eurasian
watermilfoil does not impose significant navigational problems.
Lake sediment analysis indicates there are areas around Upper Prior Lake that have a high
potential to produce nuisance milfoil growth if water clarity improves.
Management Plan: Although lake sediment fertility testing indicates the potential for EWM
nuisance growth, it should not occur until water clarity improves. Currently EWM growth is in a
stable pattern - it is not increasing nor decreasing. For EWM nuisance growth out to 150 feet
from shore, management responsibilities are up to the lakeside property owner.
')
Upper Prior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
30
--'
,--
I
,
r
r'
,
I
I
~.-:-:'~ ~.--.-.-----:--'
Implementation Plan: The Watershed District has an ongoing project administered by the City
of Prior Lake's Lake Advisory Committee (LAC) to manage Eurasian water milfoil in Prior
Lake. These funds were raised by a special assessment and initially funded aquatic herbicide
applications in an attempt to eradicate infestations. In recent years, the City and LAC have
shifted management strategies. No assessment or taxing is anticipated by the District and
involvement will cease with the exhaustion of the current funds.
Figure 21. Example of a heavy nuisance EWM condition in White Bear Lake, Washington County,
Minnesota.
Upper Prior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
31
Aquatic Plant Management Plan Summary
Table 15. Aquatic plant management goals and plans.
A. Education
Newsletters
and inserts
Goals
Information and education (I & E)
materials have been prepared and
distributed by the PUSL WD for over
20 years. For this I & E program,
materials specific to aquatic plant
management would be prepared.
B. Monitoring and Information Gathering
Aquatic plants Characterize aquatic plants.
Roughfish
Characterize roughfish.
c. Roughfish Management
Reduce roughfish populations to
below 100 pounds/acre.
D. Native Plant Management
Emergent Increase the shoreline coverage of
plants emergent plants. Currently three
parcels have emergent plant growth.
The goal is 10 to 20% of the parcels
which would represent 35 to 70
parcels out of 366 parcels with
emergent plant growth.
Increase diversity of submerged
native plants to 3 to 5 species. This
is still a relatively low diversity but
would be a realistic goal for Upper
Prior Lake.
Submersed
plants
Upper Prior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
Management Plan
The PUSL WD would oversee preparation of one or two
newsletters or newsletter inserts per year that pertain to
aquatic plants. Areas to emphasize include the
following:
1. Why aquatic plants are important.
2. How they might expand if water clarity improves.
3. What lake residents can do to manage aquatic
plants in their shoreland area.
4. Explanation of rules and regulations pertaining to
herbicide use.
Conduct aquatic'plant surveys every three years, or as
needed in Upper Prior Lake. An early summer and late
summer survey should be conducted
Survey roughfish community using conventional and
experimental techniques.
Reduce roughfish numbers using a variety of
techniques. It is assumed the existing aquatic plant
seed bank will produce the new plants necessary to
meet the native plant goals.
Recommended roughfish management techniques
include:
1. carp barriers and
2. trapping and netting for removal.
Prepare educational materials for lake residents. Begin
to establish new emergent plant stands when roughfish
numbers are reduced.
Characterize existing fish community. Reduce roughfish
numbers. It is assumed the existing aquatic plant seed
bank will produce the new plants necessary to meet the
native plant goals.
32
Goals
E. Exotic Plant Management
Curlyleaf Manage nuisance growth of curlyleaf
pondweed pondweed.
Eurasian
watermilfoil
Manage nuisance growth of
Eurasian watermilfoil.
Upper Prior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
Management Plan
It is not anticipated that curlyleaf pondweed will be a
significant nuisance. For curlyleaf growth out to 150
feet from shore, management responsibilities are up to
the lakeside property owner. The PUSL WD does not
have an active management need at this time. Ongoing
plant surveys will track future curlyleaf conditions.
Although lake sediment fertility testing indicates the
potential for EWM nuisance growth if water clarity
improves, currently it is not significant nuisance. For
EWM growth out to 150 feet from shore, management
responsibilities are up to the lakeside property owner.
The Watershed District has an ongoing project
administered by the City of Prior Lake's Lake Advisory
Committee (LAC) to manage Eurasian water milfoil in
Prior Lake. These funds were raised by a special
assessment and initially funded aquatic herbicide
applications in an attempt to eradicate infestations. In
recent years, the City and LAC have shifted
management strategies. No assessment or taxing is
anticipated by the District and involvement will cease
with the exhaustion of the current funds.
33
Table 16. Upper Prior Lake plant management project timeline and estimated costs.
A.Education
Newsletters, inserts, Inform lakeshore residents Improved community PVSL WD $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500
articles, workshops about the benefits of native understanding of the benefits City of Prior
plants, permit requirements for of native aquatic plants; Lake
treating aquatic plants, etc. reduced treatment/removal of
native plants.
Shoreland restoration Host "how-to" shoreland Increased natural shoreline PLSL WD, City $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
workshop & design restoration workshops; provide areas around the lake; of Prior Lake,
assistance tech. assistance. improved water quality, Scott SWCD,
erosion control and habitat. UM-Extension.
B. Monitorinannformation-GatherinQ
Plant surveys (spring & Survey of composition of the Measure plant community PLSLWD $3,500 $3,500
fall) plant community and health; track changes over
abundance of various species. time; provide info. needed to
plan future actions.
Carp survey Complete a carp-specific Track changes over time, PLSLWD $3,500 $3,500
survey to better estimate provide info. needed to plan
abundance of carp in lake. management actions.
C. Rouahfish ManaQement (caroal'ldbullhead)
Carp barriers Investigate locations, install Reduced carp spawning, PLSLWD, TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
and operate physical barriers reduced movement between other partners
to carp migration. water bodies, improve
potential for success of mgmt
options.
Roughfish removal Develop and implement Reduced abundance of PLSLWD, City $3,000+ $3,000+ $3,000+ $3,000+ TBD
strategies for reducing carp roughfish, increased growth of of Prior Lake, Dependent
numbers. native plants. DNR, lake on level of
residents effort
D. Native Aauatic Plants,
Emergent plants: Re-establish native emergent Increased natural shoreline PLSLWD, City $1,000- ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
Shoreline restoration plants along the shoreline. areas around the lake; of Prior Lake, $2,000 per
projects improved water quality, lakeshore parcel
erosion control and habitat. residents,
SWCD
Upp ~ior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
I
-)
34
)
Submersed plants: Prior
Lake watershed
improvements (including
Spring Lake water quality)
Reduce phosphorus in Upper
Prior Lake to long-term goal of
40 IJg/L or less; increase
average summer clarity to 4.9
feet or better.
Improves water quality and
clarity, improves conditions for
growth of native, submersed
aquatic plants.
Responsible ~
Party . Year 1
Multiple
Varies
based on
project
Estimated Costs
Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Year 5
E. Exotic Plants
NOTE: At this point, exotic plants are limited by the low transparency in Upper Prior Lake. Neither Curlyleaf pondweed nor Eurasian watermilfoil currently grow beyond 150
feet from the shoreline, and there is not a need for open-water treatment of Curlyleaf. In addition, clurlyleaf has not reached heavy nuisance growth levels. As the lake
water quality and transparency improves, growth of both these exotics may increase, and the need for more active management will need to be re-evaluated. In the
meantime, residents may treat their shorelines (within DNR guidelines and permitting requirements), but they are encouraged to focus any treatment efforts on exotic plants
and to avoid removing beneficial native plants.
Curlyleaf pondweed: Spring treatment or harvesting
Management zone from 0- of Curlyleaf pondweed.
150'
Curlyleaf pondweed: Spring treatment or harvesting
Management beyond 150' of Curlyleaf pondweed.
Eurasian watermilfoil:
Management zone from 0-
150'
Eurasian watermilfoil:
Management beyond 150'
*Lake Advisory Committee
Treat or harvest to establish
navigation lanes and
recreation zones.
Treat or harvest to establish
navigation lanes and
recreation zones.
Upper Prior Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan
Annual curlyleaf control; better
success of native plants. If
done in multiple years, may
reduce future curlyleaf growth.
Annual curlyleaf control; better
success of native plants. If
done in multiple years, may
reduce future curlyleaf growth.
Annual milfoil management.
Annual milfoil management.
Lakeshore
residents
PLSL WD
Lakeshore
residents
City of Prior
Lake/LAC*
$2.001
lineal foot
of shoreline
(optional)
o
$2.00/If
(optional)
o
35
$5001ac
(if needed)
$500/ac
(if
needed)
TBD
TBD
CAPSULE PROJECT SUMMARY
3/4/05
2006 CIP PROJECTS
City Cost
Project Description Project Amount Financing Tax Impact
QQlJ.aL Percentaae
Fire Department
(Buildings & Plan(l
1. Satellite Fire Statian/11 0' Ladder Platform Truck 2,000,000.00 2.000,000.00 b.b.
Park Department
rDeveloDmentJ
2. Park Entrance Signs 5,000.00 5,000.00 c.p.
3. Pleasure Rink Lights - Jeffers Pond & Slemmer 10,000.00 10,000.00 c.p.
4, Tree Planting Program 10,000.00 10.000.00 C.p.
5, Backstops - Jeffers & Slemmer 15,000.00 15,000.00 c.p.
6, Basketball Courts - Northwood, Jeffers, Slemmer 15,000.00 15,000.00 c.p.
7. Park Appurtenant Equipment 15,000.00 15,000.00 c.p.
8. Picnic Shelters (2) - Jeffers Pond & Slemmer 40,000.00 40,000.00 c.p.
9. Playground Equipment - Jeffers Pond & Slemmer 80,000.00 80,000.00 c.p.
ffiIJi1sl
10. Jeffers and Stemmer Ridge 130.000.00 130,000.00 C.p.
Public Works
(Buildings & Plan(l
11. Brine Production Building 15,000.00 15,000.00 uJ.
12. Lift Station Telemetry 20.000.00 20,000,00 uJ.
13. Lift Station AUAR study 100.000.00 25,000.00 uJ.
75,000.00 g.C.
14. Lift Station Renovation 180,000.00 180,000.00 uJ.
15. Municipal Well - Cardinal Ridge 735,000.00 735,000.00 t.r.
16. Ground Water Storage 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 w.r.
17. Water Filtration Plant 11,000,000.00 11,000,000.00 w.r.
(Improvements!
18. Street Overlay (Upper Willows, Blind Lake area) 100,000.00 100,000.00 o.b.
19. Trunk Watermain (CSAH 18) 100,000.00 100,000.00 t.r.
20. cSAH 12 (Stemmer phase1) 125,000.00 125.000.00 t.r.
21. McKenna Road Re-alignment 250,000.00 50,000.00 t.r.
200,000.00 S.o.
22. Prior Lake Outlet Channel Repairs 300,000.00 300,000.00 t.r.
23, CSAH 82 Reconstruction 3,040,000.00 1,200,000.00 intra-fund loan
90,000.00 gJ.
150.000.00 s.w,
1.600,000.00 tr,
Water Resources
(fmDrovements)
r; Undesirable Fish Containment Program 5,000.00 5,000.00 s.w.
25. Pond weed Removal Program 5,000.00 5,000.00 s.w.
26. Lake Bank Stabilization 15,000.00 15.000.00 s.W.
27. Storm Water Pond Dredging ~OOOO_OD ;:\0000.00 s.w.
Totals ... 20.340,000.00 20.340,000.00
Financing Source Summary
$ Project Tax Levy
o.b. Operating Budget
g.c. Grant/Contributions
gJ. General Fund
uJ. Sewer & Water Utility Fund
s.w. Storm Water Utility Fund
c.p. Capital Park Fund
t.r. Trunk Reserve Fund
s.o. Street Oversize Fund
w.r. Water Revenue Bonds
b.b. G.O. Building Bonds
Project Amount
Tax Impact
QQJlar Percentaoe
$0.00 0.00%
0.00
100,000.00
75,000.00
1,290,000.00
240,000.00
205,000.00
320,000.00
2,910,000.00
200.000.00
13,000,000.00
2,000 000 OQ
Totals ... 20,340.000.00
8
CAPSULE PROJECT SUMMARY
3/4/05
2007 CIP PROJECTS
City Cost
Project Description Project Amount Financing Tax Impact
Dollar pp.rr.p.n~
Park Department
{Developmen(J
1, Park Entrance Signs 5,000.00 5,000.00 c.p,
2. Tree Planting Program 10,000.00 10,000.00 c.p.
3. Backstops - Busse 10,000.00 10,000.00 c.p.
4. Basketball Courts - Busse & Rice Lake 10,000.00 10,000.00 c.p.
5, Park Appurtenant Equipment 15,000.00 15,000.00 c.p,
6. Picnic Shelters (2) - Busse & Rice Lake 40,000.00 40,000.00 c.p.
7. Playground Equipment - Busse & Rice Lake 80,000.00 80,000,00 c.p.
8, Watzl's Beach restroom/concession remodel 150,000.00 150,000.00 C.p.
tIJ1J.iW c.p.
9, CSAH 21, Busse, Rice Lake 110,000.00 110,000.00 c.p,
Public Works
(Buildings & Plant)
10. Lift Station Telemetry 20,000.00 20,000.00 uJ.
11. Lift Station Renovation 180,000.00 180.000.00 uJ.
12. Municipal Well - Busse property 850,000,00 850,000.00 tr.
(/morovements)
13. Street Overlay (Sand Point area I) 100,000.00 100,000.00 o.b.
14. CSAH 12 - Hwy 13 intersection leg 300,000.00 75.000.00 uJ.
100,000.00 m.S.
125,000.00 s.O,
15, Carriage Hills Parkway (east of Knob Hill) 200,000.00 200,000.00 S.o,
16, Itasca Avenue Trunk Water Line 400,000.00 400,000.00 uJ.
17, Stemmer Ridge Road extension (phase I) 630,000.00 250,000,00 S.o.
380,000.00 tr.
18. CSAH 21/Fish Point Road signal-intersection 1,700,000.00 600,000.00 10.00 1,12%
400,000.00 s.a.,
600,000.00 Lg.
100,000.00 uJ,
Water Resources
(ImorovementsJ
19. Undesirable Fish Containment Program 5,000.00 5,000.00 s.w.
20. Pondweed Removal Program 5,000.00 5,000.00 s.w.
21. Lake Bank Stabilization 15,000.00 15,000.00 S.w.
22. Storm Water Pond Dredging 30,000.00 30,000.00 S.w.
23. Woodside Road Pond 60,000.00 60,000.00 S.w.
24. Storm Drainage Improvements 80 000 00 Rn nnn n() S.w.
Totals ... 5,005,000.00 5,005,000:00
Financing Source Summary Project Amount Tax Impact
Q.Q!la.r pp.rr.p.nt~~
$ Project Tax Levy 600,000.00 $10.00 1.12%
o.b. Operating Budget 100,000.00
u.f. Sewer & Water Utility Fund 775,000.00
s.w. Storm Water Utility Fund 195,000.00
c.p. Capital Park Fund 430,000,00
t.r. Trunk Reserve Fund 1,230,000.00
s.o. Street Oversize Fund 575,000.00
m.s. Municipal State Aid 100,000.00
S.8. Special Assessments 400,000.00
i.g. Intergovernmental 6OO.OOO.OQ
Totals ... 5.005,000.00
9
CAPSULE PROJECT SUMMARY
3/4105
2008 CIP PROJECTS
City Cost
Project Description Project Amount Financing Tax Impact
Dollar Percentaoe
Park Department
{Deve/onmenfJ
1, Park Entrance Signs 5,000.00 5,000.00 C.p,
2. Tree Planting Program 10,000.00 10,000,00 c.p.
3. Backstops - Hawk Ridge 10,000.00 10,000.00 c.p.
4. Basketball Courts - Hawk Ridge 5,000.00 5,000.00 c.p.
5. Park Appurtenant Equipment 15,000.00 15,000.00 C.p.
6, Picnic Shelters - Hawk Ridge 20,000.00 20,000.00 c.p.
7. Playground Equipment - Hawk Ridge & Watzl's 65,000.00 65,000.00 c.p,
8, White Tail Island Park Gazebo 20,000.00 20,000.00 c.p.
9, White Tail Island Park Boardwalk 60,000.00 60,000.00 c.p.
10. Hockey rink - Lakefront Park 75.000.00 75,000.00 c.p.
fI.rnjW
11. Hawk Ridge 30,000.00 30,000.00 C.p.
Public Works
~s & PII1D1l
12. Lift Station Standardization Upgrade 40,000.00 40,000.00 uJ.
13. Lift Station Renovation 140,000.00 140,000.00 u.f.
14. Municipal Well - Credit River 850,000.00 850,000.00 Lr.
{lmnmvement&l
15. Traffic/Feasibility Study (TH 13 & 150th Street) 90,000.00 30,000.00 s.o.
. 60,000.00 Lg.
16. Street Overlay (Sand Point area II) 100,000.00 100,000.00 o.b.
17. Fish Point Road extension to CSAH 21 250,000.00 50,000.00 t.r.
200,000.00 s.o.
18, Stemmer Ridge Road extension (phase II) 630,000.00 250,000.00 s.o.
380,000,00 t.r.
19. Brooksville Hills I Street Reconstruction 2,100,000.00 825,000.00 13.25 1.43%
550,000.00 s.a
650,000.00 uJ.
75,000.00 s.w.
Water Resources
(/mDrovementsJ
20. Undesirable Fish Containment Program 5,000.00 5,000.00 S.w.
21. Pondweed Removal Program 5,000.00 5,000.00 S.w,
22. Lake Bank Stabilization 15,000.00 15,000.00 S.w.
23. Storm Water Pond Dredging 30,000.00 30,000.00 s.w.
24. Prior Lake Alum Treatment fiOOOO.OO 5Q.noooo S.w.
Totals ... 4,620,000.00 4,620,000.00
Financing Source Summary Project Amount Tax Impact
Dollar Percentaae
$ Project Tax Levy 825,000.00 $13.25 1.43%
o.b. Operating Budget 100,000.00
u.f. Sewer & Water Utility Fund 830,000.00
s.w. Storm Water Utility Fund 180,000.00
c.p. Capital Park Fund 315,000.00
t.r. Trunk Reserve Fund 1,280,000.00
5.0. Street Oversize Fund 480,000.00
s.a. Special Assessments 550,000.00
Lg. Intergovernmental pO 000.00
Totals ... 4,620,000.00
10
CAPSULE PROJECT SUMMARY
3/4/05
2009 CIP PROJECTS
City Cost
Project Description Project Amount Financing Tax Impact
Dollar PArr.Antao.e
Park Department
(Deve/Qpmen(l
1. Park Entrance Signs 5,000.00 5,000.00 c.p,
2. Tree Planting Program 15,000.00 15,000,00 C.p.
3. Backstops - Campbell Lake 10,000.00 10,000,00 c.p.
4. Basketball Courts - Campbell Lake 10,000.00 10,000.00 c.p.
5. Park Appurtenant Equipment 20,000.00 20,000.00 c.p.
6, Picnic Shelters (2) - Spring Lake Township 40,000.00 40,000.00 c.p.
7, Playground Equipment (2) - Spring Lake Township 80,000.00 80,000.00 c.p.
8. White Tail Island Park Boardwalk 50,000.00 50,000.00 c.p,
9. Athletic Field Complex improvements @ 5,000,000,00 5,000,000.00 r,b.
*** Spring Lake
*** Sand Point Beach & Campbell Lake Pavilions
CD:ml
10. Fremont Avenue 85,000.00 85,000,00 c.p,
Public Works
(Buildings & PianO
11 , Lift Station Renovation
12. Municipal Well - annexation area
(ImorovementsJ
13. Street Overlay (Carriage Hills area I, Raspberry)
14. Trunk Watermain (CSAH 18)
15. Trunk Sewer & Watermain (CSAH 18/42 quad.)
16, CSAH 21 N. Coop Share
125,000.00
860,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
300,000.00
790,000.00
17. Brooksville Hills I Street Reconstruction
2,100,000.00
Water Resources
(Imorovementq)
18. Undesirable Fish Containment Program 5,000.00
19. Pondweed Removal Program 5,000.00
20. Lake Bank Stabilization 15,000,00
21. Storm Water Pond Dredging 30_00000
Totals ... 9,745,000.00
Financing Source Summary Project Amount
$ Project Tax Levy 825,000.00
o.b. Operating Budget 100,000.00
g.t. General Fund 90,000.00
u.f. Sewer & Water Utility Fund 775,000.00
s.w. Storm Water Utility Fund 130,000.00
c.p. Capital Park Fund 315,000.00
t.r. Trunk Reserve Fund 1,660,000.00
m.s. Municipal State Aid 300,000.00
s.a. Special Assessments 550,000.00
r.b. G.O. Referendum Bonds ~OOO_OOOOO
Totals ... 9,745,000.00
11
125,000.00
860,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
300,000.00
90,000.00
300,000.00
400,000.00
825,000.00
550,000.00
650,000.00
75,000.00
u.f.
t.r.
o.b.
t.r.
t.r.
g.f.
m.s,
t.r.
13.75
s.a
u.f.
S.w.
1.42%
5,000.00 sw.
5,000.00 s.W.
15,000,00 s.w.
30_00000, s.w.
9,745,000.00
Tax Impact
QQlJar pp.rr.p~
$13.75 1.42%
Project Description
Economic Development Authority
1 . Downtown Redevelopment
Park Department
(Develoomen(J
2. Park Entrance Signs
3. Tree Planting Program
4. Backstops - Meadow Lawn
5. Basketball Courts - Meadow Lawn
6. Park Appurtenant Equipment
7. Picnic Shelters (2) - Meadow Lawn & Indian Ridge
8. Playground Equipment - Meadow Lawn
9. Frisbee Golf course @ The Ponds
LII:ml
10. Meadow Lawn
Public Works
f.8.u.iJsillJas & elim1l
11 . Lift Station - Meadow View Development
12. Municipal Well - annexation area
(Jmprovements)
13. Street Overlay (Carriage Hills area II)
14. CSAH 12 Reconstruction
15. Industrial Park Sewer & Water Extension
Water Resources
(Improvements)
16. Undesirable Fish Containment Program
17. Pondweed Removal Program
18. Lake Bank Stabilization
19. Storm Water Pond Dredging
20. Storm Drainage Improvements
Financing Source Summary
$ Project Tax Levy
o.b. Operating Budget
g.f. General Fund
u.f. Sewer & Water Utility Fund
S.w. Storm Water Utility Fund
c.p. Capital Park Fund
t.r. Trunk Reserve Fund
s.o. Street Oversize Fund
m.s. Municipal State Aid
s.a. Special Assessments
CAPSULE PROJECT SUMMARY
3/4/05
2010 CIP PROJECTS
Project Amount
1,400,000.00
5,000.00
15,000.00
10,000.00
5,000.00
20,000.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
20,000.00
30,000.00
200,000.00
885,000.00
100,000.00
2,640,000.00
2,200,000.00
Totals ...
5,000.00
5,000.00
15,000.00
30,000.00
80.000.00
7,745,000.00
Project Amount
0.00
100,000.00
90,000.00
550,000.00
135,000.00
185,000.00
2,385,000.00
800,000.00
800,000.00
2700000.00.
Totals ... 7,745,000.00
12
Financing
200,000.00
400,000.00
800,000.00
5,000.00
15,000.00
10,000.00
5,000.00
20,000.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
20,000.00
30,000.00
200,000.00
885,000.00
100,000.00
90,000.00
300,000.00
350,000.00
800,000.00
1,100,000.00
200,000.00
2,000,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
15,000.00
30,000.00
80.000.00
7,745,000.00
City Cost
Tax Impact
DolI;:!r_ Percent~
u.f.
s.a.
s.o.
C.p.
e.p.
e.p.
e.p.
c.p.
e.p.
e.p.
e.p.
c.p.
e.p.
t.r.
t.r.
a.b.
g.f.
s.a.
u.f.
m.s.
t.r.
t.r.
s.a.
s.w.
s.w.
S.w.
s.w.
S.w.
Tax Impact
Dolla~ PArr.Ant;:!Op.
$0.00 0.00%
CAPSULE PROJECT SUMMARY
3/4/05
2006-10 ClP PROJECT FINANCING SOURCE TOTALS
Financing Source Amount
$ Project Tax Levy 2,250,000.00
o.b. General Fund Operating Budget 500,000.00
g.f. General Fund Balance 1,4 70,000.00
u.f. Sewer & Water Utility Fund 3,170,000.00
s.w. Storm Water Utility Fund 845,000.00
c.p. Capital Park Fund 1,565,000.00
s.o. Street Oversize Fund 2,055,000.00
t.r. Trunk Reserve Fund 9,465,000.00
m.s. Municipal State Aid Fund 1,200,000.00
s.a. Special Assessments 4,200,000.00
g.c. Grant/Contributions 75,000.00
Lg. Intergovernmental 660,000.00
w.r. Water Revenue Bonds 13,000,000.00
b.b. G.O. Building Bonds 2,000,000.00
r.b. G.O. Referendum Bonds 5.000.000.00
Totals ... 47,455,000.00
13
BOAT SLIP RENTAL PROCEDURES
SLIP ASSIGNMENTS
Slip #1
Slips #2 - #9
Reserved exclusively for DNR/Law Enforcement use.
Available on a "first come, first served" basis.
Slips may not be held when unoccupied.
Vacated slips are considered surrendered to the next user.
Advanced reservations required. (Reservations accepted no more than 3 weeks in advance,
and not for more than 3 consecutive days)
Weekend (Fri, Sat, Sun.) reservations not accepted after 3pm the preceding Thursday.
No on-site reservations permitted.
Slips not reserved in advance are made available daily under the same terms and conditions
as Slips #2-#9.
Slips #10-#18
GENERAL RULES
Hours of Operation: All slips are available from 5am to 10pm daily.
NO OVERNIGHT MOORING PERMITTED.
VIOLATORS WILL TAGGED.
No fishing, water skiing, inner tube usage, diving or swimming from docks.
No beaching watercraft between the docks and the swimming beach.
NO BOAT LAUNCH OR VEHICLE WITH TRAILER PARKING IS AVAILABLE AT LAKEFRONT PARK.
RESERVATION PROCEDURES
To reserve slips, call Prior Lake City Hall at 952.447.4230.
Reservations for Slips #10-#18 are accepted not more than 3 weeks in advance.
Reservations can not be made for more than 3 consecutive days.
May not reserve more than 2 slips per day.
No more than 3 reservations (1 to 3 days per reservation) per person per boating season (May through
September). ..
No reservations held without completed reservation form and rental fee.
Renter must present and post reservation confirmation at the slip on the day of your reservation.
Fee:
Residents within corporate city limits
Persons outside corporate city limits
$35 / slip / day
$50 I slip / day
REFUNDS: Refunds will be issued for cancellations made seven (7) or more days in advance of the
reservation. No refunds will be qiven if cancelled less than seven (7) days in advance or due to inclement
weather. Weather cancellations may be rescheduled based on availability at no additional charge, but no
guarantees.
VIOLATIONS
Any violations of City Code Section 702.600 dealing with the usage and rental of City-owned boat slips, or the City
Boat Slip Rental Procedures, is considered a violation of City Code and is subject to a fine of up to $1000.
RESERVATION REQUEST - LAKEFRONT PARK BOAT SLIPS
APPLICANT:
Phone:
1/
ADDRESS:
CITY:
ZIP:
DA TE(S) OF RESERVATION:
Reservations will not be accepted more than 3 weeks in advance. Slips cannot be reserved for more than 3 consecutive days. No more than
2 slips can be reserved at one time. Not more than 3 reservations per person per boating season (May through Sept.). NO OVERNIGHT
MOORING PERMITTED.
NO. OF SLIPS REQUESTED:
WATERCRAFT REG. #: MN
FEES: Persons within the corporate city limits of Prior Lake $35.00 per slip I day
Person outside the corporate city limits of Prior Lake $50.00 per slip I day
Fees must be paid in cash or by check payable to the City of Prior Lake at the time of the reservation request to hold the date. No
credit cards accepted.
I Reservation Date ' No. of Slips I Fee Total
To Be Completed I 1 or 2 I $35.00 or $50.00
by City staff I 1 or 2 I $35.00 or $50.00
I 1 or 2 I $35.00 or $50.00 I
I Total Fee Due Upon Reservation I
REFUNDS: Refunds will be issued for cancellations made seven (7) or more days in advance of the reservation. No
refunds will be aiven if cancelled less than seven (7) davs in advance or due to inclement weather. Weather cancellations may~.
be rescheduled based on availability at no additional charge.
GENERAL RULES:
Hours of Operation: All slips are available from 5am to 10pm daily.
NO OVERNIGHT MOORING PERMITTED. VIOLATORS WILL TAGGED ANDTHE CITY WILL
SEEK THE HIGHEST PENALTY ALLOWED BY LAW. (2005 = $1000)
No fishing, water skiing, inner tube usage, dIving or swimming from docks.
No beaching watercraft between the docks and the swimming beach.
NO BOAT LAUNCH OR VEHICLE WITH TRAILER PARKING IS AVAILABLE AT.
LAKE FRONT PARK.
SLIP DESIGNATION:
Slip #1
Slips #2 - #9
Slips #10-#18
Reserved exclusively for DNR/Law Enforcement use.
Available on a "first come, first served" basis. Slips may not be held when
unoccupied. Vacated slips are considered surrendered to the next user.
Advanced reservations required. Weekend (Fri, Sat, Sun.) reservations not
accepted after 3pm the preceding Thursday. No on-site reservations permitted.
Slips not reserved in advance are made available daily under the same terms and
conditions as Slips #2-#9.
CONFIRMATION: You will receive a written reservation confirmation from the City identifying your slip assignment. This
confirmation must be oosted at the SliD on the dav of vour reservation. Failure to oresent a written reservation confirmation mav
void vour reservation. If you do not receive a confirmation at least 24-hours in advance of your reservation, please contact City
Hall at 952.447.4230.
RETURN FORMS TO: Boat Slip Reservations, Prior Lake City Hall, 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. SE, Prior Lake, 55372.
APPLICANT SIGNATURE: . DATE:
By signing above, applicant agrees to the above terms and conditions, and agrees that failure to comply with all of the terms and conditions
will preclude any future boat slip usage. Any violations of City Boat Slip Reservation Procedures, or City Code Section 702.600 dealing with
the usage and rental of City-owned boat slips, will be considered a violation of Prior Lake City Code and subject to a fine of up to $1000. .
,*