HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA93-19 Young Variance
VA 93 - /j
PID#~c;-tJlJ(Jt) 21-tJ
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
APPLICATION FUR VARma
Applicant:~YYIl a....J M Qry l(OUYlQ
P-dd:t:ess ~ ~ 4 to c;- , .s J,. (~rt' 'T ro.; I' '
l'r(}~rfy ~I!lr! 'J~Y'''''( Uk) ).Jbi"V VbU.H...
Address: 5"'I6C} C;J"CIrl- 'TYAiJ' '
Type of Otmership: Fee L-- Contract
Consultant/Contractor: Gec_l' kaz.-ika..
1
Home Phone:, lj Y. r; - 9 ~
WOtK fhone. 'f11,-f11Z-
Yome tlhone:
WOrk Phone: 'tY-7-~I75B IVVJry
Purchase Agreement
Phone:
Existing Use I) ,I .
of Property: Ke-~ I' oLe-.-. ,ffal Present Zoning: IL I
Legal Description
of Variance Site: La} q, l3/tJc Ii Z. ^-.>or+h ShUrl- CJre-$f-
Variance Requested:~I.iIlJ ". df'-c!r /)J1 ~"II,....J-J" s'iJt- ,,;= hlJfflt Feui...... I a.ke,. Wll--hi'",
7~' t1F !.~"rll".J1e over e-xirfik, pttJ-/b. D~k ,J.. !1;fP-M'f..t"t ::2.IJKi:2- ..v1/h g-lu,i,..va:,/
-lo fJa+"o)7 .' t..A~J.lo~ V'A~IANU I 6' 5AST SlD&,YO. VA-t.t~~.( 'vA: /.f'::
Has the app icant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or conditional
use permit on the subject site or any part of it? Yes X N::>
What was requested:
When: Disposition:
Describe the type of ilnprovements proposed:
j:)Ubl'1I SSION !illJl1IREMENI'S:
(A)Cornpleted application fonn. (B)Filing fee. (C)Property SUrvey indicating the
proposed developnent in relation to property lines and/or ordinary-high-water mark;
proposed building elevations and drainage plan. (D) Certified from abstract firm,
names and addresses of property owners within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of
the subject property. (E)Complete legal description & Property Identification Number
(PID). (F)Deed restrictions or private covenants, if applicable. (G)A parcel map
at 1"-20'-50' showing: The site developnent plan, buildings: parking, loading,
access, surface drainage, landscaping and utility service.
ONLY COMPLBl'E APPLICATIONS SHALL BE AC~J.'.w AND REVIEWED BY "J:t1,t; PLANNI~ <XH1ISSION.
To the best of nw knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In
addition, I have read Section 7.6 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which specifies
requirements for variance procedures. I agree to provide information and follow the
procedures as outlined in the Ordinance.
~ , ~. 'can can1ts Signature '''/
SUbmitted this I?' day of /!U;'UJ+ 1913 L~ ....-
pe ~rs S' atur~
THIS SPACE IS 'ID BE FILLED our BY THE PLANtIDl; DIlW..:.LuR
PJ:ANN:OO CXHUSSION I APPRCNID DENIED q/ ?-J q.3 MTE OF HFARIR;
W:.L'j, CCXJR:IL APPEAL APPRCNID DENIED " D!\TE OF HFARIR;
roNDITIONS:~' e:~1 Yk~O AND ~K' LA~5I10Rf-" VAQIANC-t- ,~((OVW l{) ~N S-nGl1t:f
k ulx 12' Qf",CK:. WriH IHlf... C.DNDITIQ N TItAT Tltf/ PL-A-r~OJ(M NfAR tH6 w..if
'w1U. !)e- tiMo'/f.o 0Wor<f~ 5WfiMBf4Z J. ,qqL4-_
,
j);; 1t5S0C/ItT~ \5t~. ,g. ,QQ3
Signature 0 the Planning Director fLANNfi- Date I /
&JBJEcr ::l.n'~:
~ C1ffAl{ LIWl
5th:; 5HoQ.f --rt2.AIL-
J~RRY YDUN~
APPLICANr:
OCHEDULE HEARI~ DATE:
u:1l:.u<../
./'
DNR w.uCE IF SHORELAND: V Y
PREPARE AREA MAP: \./ :-
APPLICANr wJ.'.I.CE: V;V
PROPuc.I:i CWNERS wJ.'.I.CE: iv/v
N..rJ.'.I.CE TO;..,...... - EN:;~N; "V V
1: l~!5~cr~1 0 N S:tNT TD ALL-- SiNT 3!2lf/q3 ~
.... Scott CollI1ty
~ Watershed District
cx::MvcrSSION A~'WA PAU\J::iJ.'::l:
V staff Memo
v Application Fonn
v Copy of Public Notice
"VARFM"
DATE TASK CCMPL~;J.'l::JJ
8/1'6/ 'B
( I
~I ~/q3
N/A MNCOT
, Other
V Applicable Mar:s
V Copy of Parcel Info.
Other Applicable Info.
SI'AFF Acrrv .J:nES
MAIL \J.)~f OF APPLICATION AND
REQOIRED CONDITIONS 'ID APPLlCANI':
v
MAIL OJPY OF APPLI<M'ION AND
CONDITIONS TO DNR:
v
GIVE U)~f OF APPLlCAITON AND
CONDITIONS TO BLD. INSPECroR
Ii
ASSIGN FILE NOMBER:
v
V
/
AMEND VARIAOCE SUMMARY ;:'JjJ:;~;.l':
ADD PEmIT TO ProPERI'Y MGrI':
0;/3/Q3
( .
9 ).3 /1')
I
c; /3/13
I 1
q/a/q8
. .
C{ J.J 103
q j 3; q3
. i
FILE BY: File t: VAqJ,,'9 Applicant: ~ YoLJN~
t..'-lJ Legal: ~1,., ,U',L Address: ~5 ~t<J::'1"RAJL.
.--"-'" ~t8t ~>-r 1t1Af~ ___.,L J l -( ".~~....,
FILE ~ <DNrAIN: -- ~ ~ .-
/ staff Memo ,/
~ Original Application V
--;;;;;' Copy of NJtice to Cwners vj
Planning Camn. Minutes V
V Other Infonnation
Applicable Maps and Documents
Copy of Public Notice
Corr=!:,,-,ndence
Council Minutes if Applicable
NOTICE OF HEARING
IDR
VARIANCE
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the Planning Commission in the Prior
Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on:
September 2f lc)C)~ at
R.; "'0
P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING:
To consider a variance application for Jerry Young
of 5465 Shore Trail.
5465 Shore Trail, Lot 9, Block 2, North Shore
Crest, Scott County, Minnesota.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION:
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant proposes to construct a 12' by 20'
deck on the south side yard adjacent to Prior Lake.
In order to construct the improvement, the
following variances are requested: a 31' lake shore
setback variance from the 75' setback requirement
of the Shoreland District, a 5' east side yard setback
variance from the 10' setback requirement, and a 3'
west side yard setback variance from the 10'
setback requirement.
If rou desire to be ~eard in reference to this matter, you should attend this meeting. Oral and
wntten comments will be accepted by the Planning Commission. For more infonnation, contact
the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447-4230.
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLDYER
Prior Lake Planning Conunission
DATE MAILED: August 20, 1993
CORRECTION
.VAI9PN.
NOTICE OF HEARING
.EOR
VARIANCE
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the Planning Commission in the Prior
Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on:
September 2, 1991 at
'l;10
P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING:
To consider a variance application for Jerry Young
of 5465 Shore Trail.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION:
5465 Shore Trail, Lot 9, Block 2, North Shore
Crest, Scott County, Minnesota.
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant proposes to construct a 12' by 20'
deck on the south side yard adjacent to Prior Lake.
In order to construct the improvement, the
following variances are requested:a 38' lakeshore
setback variance from the 75' setback requirement
of the Shoreland District, and a 5' east side yard
setback variance from the 10' setback
requirement.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this meeting. Oral and
written comments will be accepted by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact
the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447-4230.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
DATE MAILED: August 24, 1993
4629 Dakota 51. 5.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLDYER
18
-L--~~~
~ 14\\...L ~D.
J~ f'.;;;) CARlZIF\<:lE. ,
5385 ~3 '
A
..'--
JEFF J
ER~ oN's' FII '
~
"foP
. 0 ,.
JJ
~
5~10
-
-
53.5
-
a:l
If)
C\I
~
;:::::::;;-
~
.
I'.j WI \ 8 \ 6
fl/"Z3E:1 ~ J LiZ? I
I 2 -l I <l2"t-
1112.52. ~ L1 T ~I
13 U a
I r~z5/
I~,
16,
I~ZZl) j.<.l21Q
A~C~O' . ~ 15
14 0
/,/z5'2 ~
111%114 ~201\
14 9 13 \ 17
'I:~:J \ ..~:; \ II \ ,",,",,, \
16 51170 ,J.I'I,o \ 5S/0 )
5
IzJ~
:..---
~1"l0LF.-W'OOO
'5'.n5\?~Q5' 54"'1
5'1=-\ I 5.1\'\5 ~91
2 :3
4 3
6
7
8
0-. :;
>' .. -,
~ .~
,'>.~ ,'7'. Z'~
-'-Ci';-
~~
:7
~
OUTLOl
E
L
,;:.
.J
..u
~
o
-:$-
Il'\
Ill?3-7
2
----
CITY OF
I:
rJ
,t~'~~T
CITY OF
~ PRIOR
~ LAKE
1"\
N
; <../ 3.:.jC\
19
~
,'4
4
o
#
L
tr
p
PRIOR LAKE
, 6~VIW
~~ SUBncr Dc ~ "ACtNT ~A.. ADTAcfNT PKOPU<TI&S
~ S'tV n Puz:r,fS ~ - NI1l1 V~ R \A Ntf,S
YOUNG VARIANCE- SUBJECT SITE
.........
;-'
I.
r
:-J
,
;
i
'!
i
.
--i
I
!
I
I
1
:f
/
-....0
C
~
~,
(
~
~-
~
FENCE
GUlO ' ,,"APP , ' tJ
, E POS T LE \ ~.; USfL tJUSH
6" _~ if ,n:.
e","' ',) ~ " ~', '" ' - "-1 !YI
. 'LOCUS'T if ,"APp _APPLE r' I;~" r"
," Lo ," ..,
_ '''' ~', c
,~ 'c 0" "
",;---- . ,::>.",,' .
, " '. ~ "., '-J '"" ' ~" ·
U,,, """ 'C,_" ". '" . ,<" " · I ,~,,~.L
,,'",H "C; _ " "",,,,"' - <p"" ~, p 'ffI
45R, C? \:' 3-4" ~::4/" n'" \. mJ&'-U
'H:-_ ", ':; . CO,,,, ..,,, , , - · j j'
,- "," <, " " ' .'
(:"" ---s "" ,"",,"'" ,..'J(= 'Ae li'" r.. .,,) ,
,<" ,,' ""H irru;.C. -.,,, ' "I ., I."~'
....;J,S..W/llO l' P" 4"PLU",--- LAC Sus~~PRu8'OIRT 0 _.J :, J j ~ i
IN \ \ ,....... "~-~-
" 0 " Ccr .,""- '
'0>< ."" ,: <"~~;,, '"~) ~"'~'/'
E ,6'B1RCH~"
FENCe e,e;'lJf!
-,
'"
m :1
,
'"
<II
f'
(JJ
z
o
;0
-f
:r
c. (t)
C r_ 'C
'J ~ C'6 C@
c.' ~"'-
~'~ -
~3t'.
Ci
J '
~ .. .On '''",' ~:> ~
. ". "'''''' ,
. '. ,
~ ;r]o.1ii I {7111c"'ES 12"APPLE ...r. ,',3-,4"SIRCHES'3I; I
~ r>1 4 Ie." 12" .f'~. ,"'L-' ~' .
," c , " . . @C, ", , ,
.,{. C~r', ".;,---- -- , J
- ::--e-.~" '" ~ "'''" " _;Q' 0;., 0;;,--_"
[J] .; /1-- - ____
^ ~ '\ " ~"~'- e-. ." e,,, ,',""" ' ,
~ /'TJ- lJ7 1.' <:-- r,~~~ 3"APPLE O. 0' "APPLE
"~ Z 3"""",, 'R' ~DI::~"'.^,
\ ,. "'PL" () I 1'\..... C"n
~ ~, " "-, """ "'"
· .c '" Q r r. ~
". " '. ~
14 MAPLE, '" E E~Gf;APE '-1, "APPLE
~ , " ""co .
-------"=h~c~~,; '~--'=-'---" "~, .;c, I .
-R _ ~ _____~~
So'H So'H " ", , '_ ,,' _ ,,, ", _" "'" "
'"i~~ (RU,~}'\:,~O_~K.: O~)>{',:-":,, ~:J.L ':
o OWE" "_>",~__~__
* * F' \ , '1
~ "
\ iT,:.. \~ 1> ,
6r;~~'{ ~\
f'" III ~ \. '.
./>"rJ171
'In r' .
~
'~
GRAPE STAND
0>
,~
CDt\)
I i 1~11 I ~
CD 0
0
.::::;
-.J:I>
O~-i
en -co 1> CD
CD1Jrr1
+",0
U;:::OZ
12" CONC SlOCK RET. ~~_-!:- ,.LQ(fr t
~~
- ( T
Z mllll n ,\.;, CLOtH po OWATER
or., 1> \ '-: FAUCET
ro $ ~ ~ ~:~4
-..l ~;;;' :z \,\':
.-i, \\\\~ ~",
......:....~.:.1:~:->:~
'coNe, WALK
(JJ
N_
'~I ~CD
' (f) -:iJ-:-Y> I
~ ~d:/' CD
I I ~,~., ",_...,
",.,- T ~ I
' y 1-
15
1_
BlRcf? 0
"", WATER
'....J'S..APPlE
(f)
~
z
, '1 h ::::-I
-7
,:,' 3"BASSWOOO
-a,--- -
. '''TREE -:- ~'R!.._ oW;- -
I ~'\\~~ r~APP.l{ ----
{ I~ '\. ';;' TREE 0 c-..> \,~ RASPB. GAA[)E-
j<!! :I: '\ ""WEll 2'ASH '-.;f ~ ~. - N
~ ;~ '-L .. 3"AS~',i 14"OAK c;; I SP:tUCE~,7 r
o rn ~< . ~...._,.,-""".,~_,.~ASI-..~ 7'1 I iJ(.,ra~~-
,. I r- . 3' CCiNC WAU;~ ~... ,.,.' I TREE0a~ ' 2"A.:J X7F.. ~:
~ ."\"\ CLOT ,.~. '::..- SH ," ,,,r ~ J
~ES ! c;) .~,;",t-;;:- a'APPLE " ;kr!f!
~ 1 1> .;;./ ,:::--- -_ _, PINE ' ,
~9SH I :1J ,\ -~ ! '.' ~ '12' ,-,c .., '7 -:-;-.&.
, \\\\\'i,l_~",'~ ",I" SR'flCiO< ri.v.,."~':',
- . "- - ... ~ ..' .
~'VilLLa~"- '.:..:...,-~ .:.::;
,"
BUSHES'; """"l,p, TANI( u ~ ~~
2. CONe WAl~ __., 0_2IO.~S\
'l ~
OFLAG
PO.E
I
!-
----~
0:>
/LS
1/5
-
~ \" \. \. ';.. " '\ ~~ ~
\:lEIv> 'J'
~",<!!-i l
i ~\. m9Tt~
I' , V> r
\ il:"" rn
-i rn
" r
- ,'\ ":. '\'
I
,
r
,
......
.;(,,0(, i- '\
~S 0""
'Q ", 0
V,en
........ G5 CD
~ 2",
1> I o~-u
~ -1>
""m _
'^' 2 (") 0
N WO C
U1 + .:::0 r
j;! CD."",
0-0 0 -<
Om OJ:::O
=V. G)I
G)l>c
c(f)...,
..., -;
_I IT!
rrl ::0
;:0
:~
I
Il
111I I
-:1
I
10 "SPRUCE
10'X /J'
('ONe. F't:>.o
~ -I _I
I"
1:0
'0
,:ll
-
3"PINE:
lr
~'.,:", r
'''~''''f .r-.~__
- - 6'LOClSE FiOC \\\ ,- - ~nCtD Tr.LE .._,
WI R41lROA \ WALK~:::,,:,;~l..) . . BOX 0 l r
BORDER 0 n.S lO\S\\~\\~~ '7-,--:-c--__ ~'
~ Illl \ ,', :.' ,:'.c:''',_.;.,,:,~',;
0'" \ I2"PINEI2'S~::ROCI< :~~r-:.:,~,'_,~",.....:~
\\\\\~,\\\\'\n-k ~'SPRUCE ~.,~~O"TREE--Il~
, ! . , 2J BUSH _
3"X3'~ / ~ r;;.:. -;
FiR. T'ES REr. "A E - ......==.-..:: SIGN il .
>', LL___ ~ -==.., ,
Q)
--,.
,t,
.........-. '
I-
; I o.}
....
Q)
o
1>.1
PLANNING REPORT
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
SITE ADDRESS:
PRESE~'l'~R:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
4
VARIANCE
JERRY AND MARY YOUNG
5465 SHORE TRAIL
GINA MITCHELL
_YES XNO
SEPTEMBER 2, 1993
HISTORYIBACKGROUND:
The Planning Department has received a variance application from Jerry and Mary
Young of 5465 Shore Trail. The applicant propose.s to construct a 20 f?ot by ~2 foot
deck over an existing patio, as per the attached SIte plan. The followmg vanances
are requested in order to construct the improvements as proposed.
1. 38' rear yard variance from the 75' Shoreland District
setback requirement. , . .
2. 5' East side yard variance from the 10 SIde yard setback reqUIrement.
Upon a visit to the site, staff had a conversation with the applicant regarding the
proposed deck. The applicant explained that the deck would extend l' beyond an
existing patio. After review of the survey and existing conditions, staff determined
that a 11' by 20' deck is the the maximum depth allowed in accordance with the
variance notification. The applicant's proposal would require a 39' lake shore
variance instead of the published 38'. The applicant's measurements were taken
from the foundation of the home, rather than from the 2' cantilever to which the
deck will be attached.
PREVIOUS PROPOSAL.q:
There are no previous proposals on file for the subject site.
PHYSIOGRAPIIYi
The site is relatively flat near the building and slopes sharply downward at the
rear of the property which abuts Prior Lake. The total change in elevation is
approximately 32' from t~e road to .the shoreline. On the East side of the propert))
adjacent to the property hne, there IS a large Basswood consisting of two, 20" caliper
trunks. Along the West property line there is a significant canopy oak tree. These
t:e.es, as well as others along the shoreline offer shade and aid in the separation of
hVlng space. The property has been excavated to utilize the basement as a walkout
and sides retained, as well as an extensively landscaped sidewalk and stairs down
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLDYER
to the lakeshore.The excavation and retaining walls have also given the property
owner a buffer from its adjacent property owners, and allowed them to actively use
their lake shore property.
EXiSTING CONDl.110NS The survey indicates the locations of the existing home,
~Ab~, And aArAa~. Th~ sub]~ct si~ m~9.sur~s Qg~' \c)t).~ on th~ W~~t "tl't()'O~n~ \m~
and 2.69' on t~e B,ast property line at tbe 9Q4 contour of 'Prior Lake. The width of
the pr~perty IS 5.0., for a total area of approximately 13,750 square feet. The existing
home IS not posItIoned parallel to the property lines resulting in varying side and
rear yard setbacks. The Southeast corner of the proposed deck is 37' from the 904
contour.
The subject property was of North Shore Crest Subdivision which was platted in
1950 within Eagle Creek Township. In 1973, the City of Prior Lake annexed this
area.
PRECEDENCE:
Staff researched and found that 4 variance files exist for the the 5 lots located to the
East and 5 lots located to the West of the applicant's property. The attached map
indicates the lots which have received variances. Of these lots, two received 5' side
yard setback variances, and two received variances to create 75' lots. No lake shore
variances were given.
This is a well established neighborhood of single family homes and cabins which are
situated at various setbacks from all property lines. These homes, with the
exception of two, which received variances for 75' wide'lots, were built from the mid
1950's to the early 1970's. They are all long lots with homes that were mostly built
near the lake, closer than the 75' lake shore setback. There will be minimal, if any,
impact on the surrounding area due to the fact that the addition of the proposed
deck will be above an existing patio at an elevation consistent to that of the adjacent
properties.
ALTERNATIVESl
1.
Deny the application submitted by the applicant.
Approve the application as staffhas recommended.
2.
3.
Table or continue the variance for specific reasons.
Deny the application based upon findings and facts relative to the
hardship criteria of the Zoning Ordinance, inconsistency with
precedent or, other purposes related to the Zoning Code.
HARDSHIP CRItERIA:,
4,
1.
~teral enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
WIth respect to the propert~
~s property ,!as .platted and developed in Eagle Creek 1bwnship
pnor to annexation Into the City of Prior Lake.
2.
Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to
the property.
Rationale for granting the variance is that permitting the proposea
deck will be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood by
iHMlItAifli111 th~ ~lnvgtinft ~nngigtQnt to thgt of thQ adjacent Droperty
~ '.. ~_ers. 'E~gh'\. o~ the '\.en. adiacen.t lots in t.he area are older h.omes that
have been built close to the lakeshore. As conversions are made on
these long, narrow lots, upgrading may cause infringement on the lake.
The proposed deck will provide an opportunity conducive to lake shore
living.
3.
The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the
result of persons presently having an interest in the property.
The side and rear yard hardships are not the result of the applicant
nor the City of Prior Lake, but the result of the former platting and
zoning standards of Eagle Creek Township.
4.
The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice, and is not contrary to the public interest.
The proposed improvements observe the spirit and intent of the
Ordinance by allowing the applicant to improve a lakeshore property
with a deck attached to the home. Substantial justice would be realized
by allowing the owners of the property that is substandard in width
and rear yard setbacks, due to previous platting and zoning
requirements of Eagle Creek Township, to improve their property.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Alternative number 2 due to the fact that the applicant's request
for a 12' x 20' deck is not in accordance with the variance notification.
p ~ C/JJJv q / I 'C(3
, V(0 PctvL5'
Fr{)fn: Vef)JL!l,V I20bbi ns
5++5 Shore Jrl. (2 prop, 1--0 W)
/' qg rus rIj uN K rq:JDrt-
/OPp05tS decJUit shcl dta~jS up.
CljJI-I/qJvJoi:f frf)'r'rG Ed /v7a-CfJrkel/ (adj~ Tv <V
~ 5175 6hDre- I rJ.
,/ (10 prohlem
8/zro /93
~ I "-~ ~ ; ~ ') c..c.~",,; '" ; c "-'
c....\'\-l c~ Prio.- Lo.~e...
D<<..A^- 'S,.;.- :
~~s \~ \:) ).-- r~~~~<<.... -\--.::. -\-h~ S.~r~b~ G I C)C,3
\)o.......i~c.~ h~...i) ~r- --Sca.r....'1 '\-- Y'V""'Io...-, ~c'-'n~ ~ b~,-,d
(A. J~I'- c..,...,. -\-he:... \c....i::.e- $l-d<e:..-o-\:. -+h~;.- hoVV\~
As-\- ~<L i .- \('""I~; <J '"' \0.:>.-- ~ ~ ~'<... \......JQ,~ -\- :r.. --+ u.. \\ I S \..-\~.--t-
-\-\.--e..,.- p-ropcs,<'l-\ ~ b\A\\d a.-. &c..l<-. a...s. )'Y)J);c..o..~J) ) V'.-
~~fl- ~Q:.p.ri""'j Y"'o-\.;+;<=-P--\-;..w,-_ -=S-~r...'1 ~J vY)o....., h~\J~ pI-UU"--
~ 6~ ~~O~ Y\<<:..\)~bo"'s ~....- Y'y"'Io,,,",\ ~~o.....s o....,d.I -+)-'-'.50+
-Rl2.;'- d~cJL jV"\^F..-o~vv-~,",+ Wl-l\ b~ 0... S ~v-...s.I4-;u \') S{~)~J)
\'Y'Y')r~\J~~~+ ~ -th.~ \a..t.~S.k;:r<L e~v;\--ClI'..\(V"\~~+- \Y'\ Ou..- ~\--~~.
>\ "'-c.~.... e. \ '"1. )
~W/~
Linci4 W/~~
5C/55 Sh0re.- /ri:A;/ ,ILIc:-
PYiVyUJcfL tnN S53/~
II
STATE OF
~~~~@U~
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Metro Waters, 1200 Warner Rd., st. Paul, MN 55106
UWDN~ND, ~'~-'~1~ ~t~~~,
August 30, 1993
Mr. Horst Graser
City of Prior Lake
4629 Dakota street S.E.
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372
RE: Setback Variance Application, 5465 Shore Trail
Dear Mr. Graser:
I have reviewed the materials which accompanied the notice of
hearing for variance at Lot 9, Block 2, North Shore Crest. Please
incorporate these comments into the hearing record for the proposed
variance.
The Department of Natural Resources is opposed to the variance as
proposed. Currently, the existing home and utility shed do not
meet current setback standards. Revised shoreland rules require a
75' structure setback from the 904' contour around Prior Lake. The
rules would allow for a single water-oriented accessory structure
to encroach within the structure setback. Without the proposed
deck both the home and shed already encroach. In addition, there
is what appears to be a concrete slab within approximately 10 feet
of the 904' contour.
Bear in mind, the applicant is required to provide evidence of
hardship when pursuing a variance from zoning standards.
The North Shore Crest area has many narrow
development not meeting current standards.
nature simply exacerbate the crowding and
shoreline development.
lots with existing
Proposals of this
visual impacts of
Because the property currently contains multiple structures not
meeting the required setback, and because two patio-type slabs
exist for outdoor use and lake-viewing opportunity, the DNR
recommends denial of the variance as proposed.
If the applicant adequately demonstrates hardship, and the city
chooses to grant the variance despite DNR objection 'it is
recommended that as a requirement of the variance, the' utility
shed near the shore be removed before construction of the deck.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Mr. Yors~ Craser
City of Prior Lake
August 30, 1993
Page (2)
Please send me a copy of the minutes of ,the variance proceedings
following Planning commission and City Council action on the
matter. I am interested in reviewing Planning commission and City
Council discussion regarding hardship and any other issues related
to the variance process.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Please call
me at 772-7910, if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~~~~'
{/atrick J. Lynch
Area Hydrologist
r
PJL/cl
..
VI
UNIVERSAL TITLE
327 Marschall Road, Suite 250
Shakopee, MN 55379
(612) 445.7949
August 18, 1993
Jerry & Mary Young
5465 Shore Trail
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: 100 FOOT RADIUS SEARCH FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
Lot 9, Block 2, North Shore Crest.
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Young,
We have examined the records in the Office of the County Recorder, Scott
County, Minnesota, and have found the following persons to have an interest
in property within a 100 foot radius of the aforesaid described property:
1. Eric M. Davis & Jeannie L. Robbins
5445 Shore Trail NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Parcel #25-040020-0 - Lot 7, Block 2 and PIO Lot 6, Block 2, North
Shore Crest, lying E of a line com at pt on
W line 25' E of NW cor, S to shore line and
there terminating.
2. Linda Jeanne Wiecher
5455 Shore Trail NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Parcel #25-040021-0 - Lot 8, Block 2, North Shore Crest.
3. Edmund J. & Alice McCorkell
5475 Shore Trail NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Parcel #25-040023-0 - Lot 10, Block 2, North Shore Crest.
4. James L. Thornton Jr. and wife
5485 Shore Trail NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Parcel 025-040024-0 - Lot 11, Block 2, North Shore Crest.
5. Donald I. & Sharon Iverson
5495 Shore Trail
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Parcel #25-040025-0 - Lot 12, Block 2, North Shore Crest.
(CONTINUED)
Page 1
..
,.
6. Arnis & Stephanie L. Ozols
14548 Shore Lane
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Parcel #25-215104-0 - Lot 3, Block 8, Sand Pointe 4th Addition.
7. Gary L. & Marie A. Grenz
14549 Shore Lane
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Parcel #25-215097-0 - Lot 3, Block 7, Sand Pointe 4th Addition.
8. Nancy M. & Danny D. Ellingson - CONTRACT FOR DEED PURCHASERS
5500 Shore Trail NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Parcel #25-215098-0 - Lot 4, Block 7, Sand Pointe 4th Addition.
Kjell D. & Amy S. Erickson - FEE OWNERS
[NO ADDRESS AVAILABLE.]
UNIVERSAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
By: 0:3w-- ,JClo0~
Authorized Signature ~
Page 2
On this 18th Day of August, 1993.
blw
UNIVERSAL TIllE INSURANCE COMPANY
c-:I. LICENSED ABO) I t1ACTOR
U, STATE OF MINNESOTA
RECEIPT
DATE
K-18-f~
'~~21785
CITV OF
, ~ ~ ~ _ A _( :
4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E,. PRIOR LAKE. MN 55372
Rece i ved of 9<-)-) JvC.l. A
whose addresS~d/or le~1 19scriPtion~
LJ .
the sum of ~"'J rU.NJ)JhA~ "
for the pu;pose of A' /;~~~ ~ ~ - ,/"tj(
ij.Y tf '
~~~llars'
'~
~,
$ ;ls-.. O~
Reference Invoice No._
A )f;~1:/~
I J' l - "-
Receipt Clerk for the City of Prior Lake
-
SCOTT COUNTY COMPLETE TAX REPORT
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------;
: PID # : 250400220 PROPERTY TYPE: 10 I
- ---------------------------------------------+
tp;;;;;t;-i~f;;;;ti~~----------- - :
~------------------------------------------------------------------------------,
PRIOR LAKE MN
725
TWP- 25 9 - 2 NORTH SHORE CRES
T
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
:Owner Information
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
OWNER NAME: YOUNG JERRY W & MARY L
JT OWNER
ADDRESS
LOCATION
PROP CITY :
CITY/TWN
LEGAL DESC:
5465
SHORE
TRL
ZIP CODE: 55372
ACRES
1. 87
TAXPAYER JERRY W & MARY L YOUNG
ADDRESS 5465 SHORE TRAIL
PRIOR LAKE MN
: 55372
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
MARKET VALUE: 110,800
BASE TAX
TAX w/ASSMT :
1,973
3,001
Effective '93
HOMESTEAD : Y
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXISTING DECK IS A LEGAL NON-CONFORMING STRUClURE, THE PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION WOULD NOT ENCROACH ANY FURTHER INTO THE CURRENT
SETBACK, THE HARDSHIP WAS CAUSED BY A CHANGE IN THE CODE BY THE Lll -{
OF PRIOR LAKE AND NOT 1HE APPLICANT, AND IT WOULD NOT BE D~l I<lMENTAL
TO THE REALTII AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY.
VL1t~ tH~n gignifl~d ayeg by LDftug, Greenfield, Roseth, and Arnold. MOTION CARRIED.
A recess was called at 7:50 P.M. as the next scheduled item was for 8:00 P.M., at which time the
meeting was reconvened.
ITEM III - JOHN BEAUPRE- VARIANCE
John Beaupre-5504 Candy Cove Trail stated he has a purchase agreement on property located at
15271 Fairbanks Trail and as there is not a garage on the site now, is requesting a 5 foot variance
in order to build. The sale is contingent on the approval of a variance.
Horst Graser presented the information as per memo of September 2, 1993. The request is for a
5 foot west sideyard setback variance from the 10 foot sideyard setback requirement. Previous
variances granted to the subject site were for a 5 foot east sideyard variance for a house addition
in 1984 and a 5 foot east sideyard variance for a porch and deck in 1991, The subject site is flat
near the building pad and slopes sharply down to the rear and is approximately 50 X 150 feet.
There has been precedence set of variances granted in the neighborhood. The proposed
construction goes beyond any previously established variance perimeters. The Planning
Commission has never issued two 5 foot sideyard variances. The maximum side yard variances
have been 5 feet and 3 feet. The neighborhood is in a period of transition and development. Mr.
Graser suggested a change in the garage design and a 3 foot variance be granted instead of the 5
foot as requested.
John Beaupre stated the change suggested would not be practical or aesthetically pleasing to the
existing construction,
Comments from the Commissioners were: Commissioners Greenfield read the hardship findings
into the record and with that interpretation, does not approve of the variance. Commissioners
Roseth voiced concerns on starting a precedence if a double variance was granted for the
property. Commissioner Loftus stated the lot is substandard, felt if a variance is granted it should
be as the applicant requested, rather than reducing the request to 3 feet. Commissioner Arnold
stated that granting a variance would set a precedence.
MOTION BY GREENl'lt.LD, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO DENY THE REQUESTED
VARIANCE FOR 15271 FAIRBANKS TRAll.., Llll.NG THAT THE APPLICANT HAS NOT
PROVEN HARDSHIP FINDINGS 1 TO 4 AS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND
THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL OF AN AESTIIETICALLY PLEASING DESIGN IS NOT
RECOGNIZED AS CRITERIA FOR GRANTIN;G A VARIANCE.
Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Roseth, and Arnold. Nay by Loftus. MOTION
CARRIED. Variance was denied. ' '-
ITEM IV . .TERRY V~G . VARIANCE
.....
Jerry Young-5465 Shore Trail, stated he wishes to construct a deck over an existing patio and is
requesting a rear yard and east sideyard variance.
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 2.1993
Page 2
Associate Planner Gina Mitchell, presented information as per planning report of September 2,
1993, The application as submitted was for a 20 X 12 foot deck over an existing patio. The
variance requested is a 38 foot rearyard variance from the Shoreland District setback requirement
and a 5 foot east sideyard variance from the 10 foot sideyard setback requirement After review
of the survey and existing conditions, Staff detennined that a 10 X 20 deck is the maximum
depth allowed in accordance with the variance notification. The subject site is 50 X 286 and is in
a well egfubllghed glngle fam11y nelghborhood that has been granted variM1ces. The side and rear
yard hardships are not the result of the applicant nor the City of Prior Lake, but the result of
actions of a previous governing body. Comments from the DNR stated they are opposed to the
variance and the utility shed located on the property by the lakeshore should be removed prior to
construction. Comments from Ed McCorkel of 5475 Shore Trail were in support of the variance
and a letter from Linda Weicher of 5455 Shore Trail also supported the request. A phone call
from Jeannie Robbins was of the same opinion as the DNR in regards to removing the shed.
Comments from the Commissioners were on: site line of deck, and the existing slab and shed
should be removed.
Mr, Young stated he plans to remove the slab but cannot do so because of the cost at this time
and the utility shed is needed for their life style.
MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO APPROVE A 38 FOOT REARYARD
VARIANCE FROM THE 75 FOOT SHORELAND DISTRICf SETBACK REQUIREMENT
AND 5 FOOT EAST SIDEYARD VARIANCE FROM THE 10 FOOT SIDEYARD
REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT, CO~ llNGENT UPON THE REMOVAL OF THE
EXISTING SLAB BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. RATIONAL BEING LI1 ~KAL
ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD BRING ABOUT A HARDSHIP,
PRECEDENCE HAS BEEN SET, AND THE SUBJECf SITE WAS PLA11~1J UNDER THE
JURISDICTION OF A PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.
After discussion on the contingency, a friendly amendment was made as follows: THE SLAB
SHALL BE REMOVED BY SEPTEMBER 1, 1994. This was agreeable with the applicant.
Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Roseth, Arnold, and Greenfield. MOTION CARRIED.
A brief recess was called at 9:00 P.M. and reconvened at 9:02 P,M.
ITEM V - PI1Ill,T(; HEARING - THE WILDS pno - REZONING
The Public Hearing was called to order at 9:02 P,M. by Chairman Arnold. The public was in
attendance and a sign-up sheet was circulated.
Mr. Graser presented the information as per memorandum of September 2, 1993. The objective
of this hearing is to consolidate the commercial district of The Wilds Planned Unit Development
under one PUD Zoning. Prior Lake Development L.P. has consented to the consolidation of the
entire 580.4 acres under one PUD. Only under a PUD concept can a City deviate from standards
of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Robert Hoffman, Counsel Consultant, suggested an
amendment to the PUD section of the ZOfling Ordinance.
John Q'Loughlin-2988 Valley View Road, Shakopee, MN - stated he is pleased with The Wilds
development and what has been done. "
Discussion by the Commissioners followed on the issue and what procedure to follow on the
resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 2.1993
Page 3
..""""
/
5" ~ 6 5" 5' 'ffo1.E:
'J"Jqe}tY 0-/ 'f/lh-Y
rf(/t:PL
't! ()1I tJ (J
.....
t--...
t ~..,.-
.l"..
I '\
(-
\.......~
'_.J
\...j
T
l
',> lJ Y)f p.
7\
-,,- " F,I -- ---,-,~
ft/) vI
1- ,
f '
\.
t..--... ..... ---.-,.. '-..--..---..,.,,-
, "
.,.. ,,,_. r) /}.. ,(
""",..., \,.~. .;..
"'...1/
',' ---.----~'-- --~'--r..-'. .,--.-,..
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
:
i
!
f
......,
I
I
I
I'
I
I
,. ,I
f
r "
~:,~_.
I
._..1
I
i I
\3"1
..... t /'
i I
I;
I
..~..._F'/./'7, ./ /7..,~,~~-,L).;L}{:._r~/--1,/(
// . // ./ / ,;7"7'''/ ,/ ,-
/ ,/ ,,/ .// /. I
.../ .' ,/ .../' >.'/ /' // ,/)
././ / / /' / /j
/ "' ,nO;t)SJi~/> / / ////~
/ /YJ}i.c/'f ,AA!~ . /
, / -s-~~Af/ /
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
~,,7p
-. . 3; 11 - .
(}p! 93650
SHORE
c #c C(J~8_ ~
SUk.lJov^!771~5'-E---~'!f5f7tJ8 )
_____~, ,- - '820552
l7;h,</b) N 50.00 _ . J --
_ ~-:>r"/\
~ ~ (95-$<IV/ \
- - '--1"(,93590 I ;
,
\
TRA\ L
PCt'pi'l.cp.d foc:
JERRY YOUNG
8r;rv,N1lN'otlS
!J;;..'/y&
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Lot 9, Block 2, NORTH SHORE CREST,
according to the recorded plat thereof,
Scott County, Minnesota.
:z.z, ;:
." 'J" ~ '}-:./
1:\) FIZAJV!.E /
~ qJ1KAcqE'
N1
/
<D
to
]~
I :
=~ : 1
~~\ \
_ en
<;too"
ION I
~I
I
Z \"
I
I
'"
, t
-4
l'-
to
10
N
C\I
I
\
1
I _W
1-10
...\ rt')
--<;t
~IO
I 0
" (f)
0 Denotes lron monument set, se note
. Denotes lron monument found
I Denotes concrete slab
a
(J36,9/1 Denotes existing elevation
y '(- Denotes chain link fence
5;ucGO
6ARACjc'
OIJE
5TVRY
57vCL-O
DW}":LL.lf./q
# ~'15:5
(? ;./ e
,v S;p/ty
\J\ FIZA /V1 G
~' DIA/Gt.1-IHCf
':' WAt..JL-ouT I \
, j JP ,16G 1 I
, ,5-r \
! \ lFi-oof(J1ZI.f3~. J \
I II," _ ~ '), ,~\' , 'A,\'
::i~; rr'i~5
~ 1tft92:/b~ ~\1DI- \\
I 149,,,,
~ S 850\2'08 W I
Q , C CoJ.JC 8LY..
<;\ '::: '\-\ " /t771fT>' B/.Pq,
~l\ ~3: ~/
~ (9/101'>7 i" \
~7 \'. '. \ :
l,i '~:III\ ': '''1, 10.98) 1./ "- -
~ - .--' E?>6TE PF WOOD ,..vAL /-L
~ Q-ptIN/H'~ j-V/9LL
/7" 90t! &.7t'?V,cLy... ~ 't
~ \...~ ~ qo3'
Iq!>
8/1;:;'
r
Note :
Proposed deck to be located above concrete
slab adjacent to the south face of dwelling. 1
-"
, /
(I.<lJ5
5/0 r<:Y
p<:;.I;y1E
I Dy./5tt-lNt'/
.p 6<11'3
At the request of Mary Young the timber
retaining walls and stairways between the
house and the lake were not located.
.
-
FRAME
A,<;D,
C(JJv'c f2..~E
l3 L.O C f<.
{1iJe-"Q'
C07P'~G
//~
...;:;;:;;- ~
---- ~\O~ f!.~-.f"
r> r-,A &P
3uJL
I
~-
RENCHM^RK
Tron monument at the northwest corner
Of Lot 8, Rlock 2, NORTH SHORE CREST.
EJp.vation 936.50 N.G.V.D.
SCALE
~ II
o 15
IN
.'
30
FEET
~
60
14243 Mitoka Circle N.E.
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372
612-445-9154
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
~t:~
adiffies E)jBoerhave RLS
Date /7LJ4fIL~/ /1}; /.i...1!J Reg. No. 709S .
t
BOERHAVE LAND SURVEYING, INC.
..