HomeMy WebLinkAboutBuilding Permit 06-874, 06-0883, 06-1031, 06-1030, 06-1087, 07-0027, 06-1121
:;- oX 0 000000 "1J ~ )0- -(')
en 0 :I: C z_
~ (') ~ en'Tlz'Tl'Tl'Tl 0 c ~:c!
a o 0 3C ~zen~oo z z ::u
(') !l m mo
)0- 0 ;u ;u 3C m)o-c: c:o m ::u m
~ :-! ;u " zr-~!!!~~ en (')."
r" r- m (f) m Z (f) ~"1J
r- (f) -i~)o~ !=>
:.a t (') )0 z O;u
t'!l -i -i "1J - -i z-
-t m 0 -
IC ~ )0- - (') Z 0 zO
(f) C/)
s cD 'Tl -i Z O;u
co )0 0 ::j!):
~ C1I (')
~ 0 -l Z (')"
." (') 0 mm
~ 0 )0 ;u
::u r- ;<
~ -l r-
'Tl "1J
:... :I: 0 ;u
~ m ;u 0 000000
z ::u (')
m m
~ >< m m i:"1Jen;:E!I:"1J
-i Z 0 mr-~>mr-
>if en (')C: -l(')C:
I ~ z ~ "1J ::J:i: m::J:i: "1J (') en
en m 'Tl2:!::U::U;u2:! m 0 (')
~ "1J ::l (') zZ::J:::J:-Z ::u z :I:
::l ClI -i !I:
m :::t >Ci)00 Ci) -l m
~ (') () (5 r-'Tl00 ;u ~ ;u 0
-i 0 Z z"" - c:
~ 0 :a- OJ >c:c: Z r-
Z :-! m r-"1J"1J 0 m
~ N 'Tl C
.... 0 ..,.-
~ :I: ::u
m
~ 0 (')
c: rt~
::u 0 J
< 000000
en m
Ed z ;u Ci)'Tl'Tl(')m en
z
Roo )0- Ci) >;;;;O~ -.J
c ~mm!l:Ci)
~ < _"1J"1J"1J~ ....c
> ifi>>>o
~ z
0 >O(')z:;;
~ !f1 _mm-i_
;U'Tl;U r- ....
-i-- r- i!
enZ z rn
-i~ Ci)
w
:I
j:
wi:
!;(
Q
-
o
W
...I
::l
o
w
:I:
o
en
Ww
~O
~j:
0::0
OZ
-Z
0::0
a..-
u.t-
o~
~~
-z
0_
-
-
::::>
U)
U)
w
0::
C
o
00(
Cl ...It-
~ oo(en
...I _~t-
-l a:u.a:
-t-WW-
!:!:~0000(
O~~~~
~a..a..a..:J
Cl:lWwen
88~~~
000000
I
~
0::
I-
Z
o
o
o
Z
t-
i
0::
W
a..
a..a....J
::l::loo(
~~~
IX: oou...J
Cl OOCloo(
Z_:l::l:Z~
iDIX:IX:IX:iDU.
::&::J:W~::&::J:
::lo~ ::lo
..JW.... ..JW
a..::&~ena..:I
000000
0::
w
~
o
z
o
Z i=
0_ z 0
o w
o ~!<~~ ~
Z _0-...1 Z
W O~~::l~iij
Z oOIX:en~!::
o u.u..u..2!:u..en
if ,)l00000
Cl
Z
ii2
w
>
o
o
W
a:
o
u..
w
a:l
Z
o
i=
o
W
a..
en
o 0 Z
W W iii
~ ~ IX:
o 0 IX:
IX: IX: 0
a.. a.. u..
~ ~ :i
o 0( ~
t- Z
~ 0 -L
~ B g
i= 00( :>
0( t-
en 0
~ w
IX: IX:
o IX:
~ 8 0
o~o
o
o
....
c
o
()
~
c
~
ui
o
Z
00(
~
00(
~
en
0::
::l
o
:I:
..,
N
Z
o
i=
o
W
a..
en
~
~
W
Z
W
:I:
t-
o::
~
~
~
~
"lI
i5
~
~
(;:)
~
~
~
ll<
~
~
~
~
~
~
!-o<
;:
"
~
~
v
~ ~
o~o ~ :t
J } 000000 "0 0 > -(')
en :J: ~ 0 Z_
"8 8 0 ~ 0 en'TIz'TI'TI'TI 0 C ~:c!
a !l 3C ::jzen~OO z m ::u mo
0 ;u ;u ;u ~ ~>C:i:iS m ::u m 0."
~ :-! ;u ;u " ~r-E~g~ z en ::j"1J
m m en m en
~ o > Z p ...c:: 0 ;u
-l -l "1J - -l z-
-t m 0 - .....:Iz~
IC en (J) (') Z 0
S ~ -l Z .-~>
0
~ 0 Z ~o "
-l
0 > 0 tmm
~ > Z ;u
r- 0 .-<
r;j r-
'TI "1J "1J
:... 0 ;u ;u
~ ;u 0 0 000000
;u 0 0 f
~ m m m i:"1Jen;:Ei:"1J
m m
Z 0 0 mr-~>mr-
oe: -loe:
>if ~ en ::J:i: m::J:3: (')
2 ~ "1J "1J , en
m 'TI2:!;:u;u;u2:! m 0 0
~ ::l (') ZZ::J::J:-Z ;:u Z :I:
::l ~ ClI -l >Ci)00 Ci) !I: -l wm
:::t
;;: () (5 r-'TIOO ;u ::j ?' )~
0 Z z~~ - z
~ :a- OJ ~"1J"1J P m
:-! m C
'TI
~ 0
;u
m
~ 0
0 ~ooooo f
<
m
Ed ;u t l~~~g~ ~
Z ....
R- Ci) , ~mm3:Ci) rn
~ k z~~~~
~ ~ ~(')(')Z~
~ _mm-l_ ....
;:U'TI;:U r-
-l-- r- i!
en~ Z rn
-lr- Ci)
o~o 0 000000 "0 0 )> -0
::J: ~ 0 z_
o 0 ~ 0 en'Tlz'Tl'Tl'Tl 0 z 0 ~~
a 000 3C ::jzen~oo z m ::u mo
;u ;u ;u i ~ ~>C:3:iS m ;u m ~."
~ ;:u ;:u " zr->zoz Z en
r" m (f) m en -"1J
:.a ~ )0 z ~ ~Ci)~Ci) p O;u
z-
t'!l ~ > ::! -t m 0 - zO
IC o en C/) o Z 0 0::U
S -i 'Tl -l Z
- > (5 ~>
~ o 0
Z -l Z 0"
)0 0 mm
~ r- Z ;U
;:u r- 0 .-<
~ -l ." "1J "1J
:... ::J: 0 ;U ;U
~ m ;U 0 0 o~oooo
z ;U 0 0
m m m i:"1Jen;:Ei:"1J
~ >< m m m
z mr-~>mr-
-l 0 0 oe: -loe:
:.a en
!< ~ Z 0 "1J ::J:3: m::J:3: "1J 0 en
~ en :e m 'Tl2:!;:U;U;u2:! m 0 0
"1J ::l 0 zZ::J:::J:-z ;U Z :I:
::l ~ m ClI -i >Ci)00 Ci) 3: -l m
0 :::t (5 r-."OO ;U ::j ;u c
~ ()
-l 0 Z -"" - z c:
0 ~ Ze:e: r-
~ OJ ~"1J"1J P m
z m C
'Tl
~ N 0
....
:I: ;:u
m
~ 0 0
c: 0 ~ J~
;U < 000000
en m
Ed z ;U Ci)'Tl'Tlom
)0- Z >;;;;O~
R- 0 Ci) ~mm3:Ci)
~ < _"1J"1J"1J~
> ifi>>>o
~ z
0 >ooz:;;
""! !f1 _mm-l- ....
~ ;U'Tl;U r-
-i-- r- i
enz z rn
-i~ Ci)
:;- 0)(0 (") 000000 "0 e )> -0
'" 0 ::J: ~ 0 z_
-0 o 0 :::E (/)"'z"''''''' 0 0 ~~
3C z
g 000 ::jzen~OO Z m ::u me
;U ;U ;U !!!>e:3:~S m m
;U " 3: ;U en ~."
zl"">zoz z
r" m en ~ m p en -"1J
:.a )0 Z ~ ~Ci)~Ci) O;:u
z-
r" -i -f m 0 - zO
IC en C/) o Z 0
S 'Tl -l Z O;U
> 0 ::!!):
~ 0 z 0"
-l
." 0 mm
~ 0 > ~ s::-
;U I""
~ -i I"" 6>
'Tl "1J
:... :I: 0 ;:u
~ m ;U 0 000000
z ;U 0
~ m !!! m i:"1Jen:::Ei:"1J
>< m ml""~>ml""
-l Z 0 oe: -loe:
:.a en
!< ~ Z ~ "1J ::J:i: m::J:3: "1J 0 en
~ en m 'Tl2:!;u;u;u2:! m 0 0
" "1J ::l 0 zZ::J:::J:-z ;:u Z :I:
::l ~ m CD -l >Ci)OO Ci) :!: -l m
:::t (5
~ 0 () 1""'Tl00 ;0 ::j ;U C
-l 0 Z -"" - z c:
0 ~ OJ ze:e: I""
~"1J"1J P m
z m 0
~ 'Tl
N 0
....
~ ::J: ;U
m
~ 0 0
c: 0 f
;:u < 000000
en m
~ Z ;u Ci)"''Tlom ~
)0- Z >;;;ij0~ ....
R- Ci) f!!mm:!:Ci) m
c
~ < _"1J"1J"1J~
)0- ifi>>>o
~ z
0 >OOz:;;
""! !f1 _mm-l- ....
~ ;U'Tl;U I""
-l-- I"" i
enz Z 1ft
-l~ Ci)
:;- o)i(o 000000 "1J ~ )0- -(')
en :I: C z_
~ 0 0 ~ en'Tlz"''Tl'Tl 0 C ~:c!
8 0 Sl 0 0 ::jzen~oo Z m ::0 mo
0 ;U ;U ;U ~>C:3:iS m ;:u m 0."
~ :-! ;U ;U " zr->zoz Z en ::j"1J
m m en
0 0 en ~ ~Ci)~Ci) !=> O;u
:.a ,-4 -l > ~ z-
t'!l -l m 0 - zO
> o Z 0
IC 0 en -l Z 0::0
S -l ~ 0 ::!!):
~ C1I -
0 (') Z 0"
-l
." > 0 mm
~ 0 Z ~
;:u 0
~ -l "ll "ll
:... :J: ;U ;U
~ m 0 0 000000
z 0 0
m m m i:"1Jen;:El:"1J
~ >< m m mr-~>mr-
-l 0 0 oC: -l0C:
>if Z ~ :1:1: m:l::!: "0 (') en
I ~ en 'Tl2:!;U;U;u2:! m 0 (')
"1J ::l zZ::J:::J:-Z ;u Z :I:
::l ~ m CD >Ci)00 Ci) :!: -l m
~ (') ~ r-."oo ;U ::j ;u C
-l 0 -"" - Z c:
0 :a- Zc:c: r-
~ ~"1J"1J P m
Z :-! C
~ N
....
~ :I: ~
~ 0 ~
c: \ l~
;U o):.:p 0 0 0 ,%
en
Ed z Ci)"''''o~
)0- >;;;;0
R- C ~mm3:Ci)
~ ~ _"1J"1J"1J~
~ ifi>>>o
z > 0(') z:;;
~ (') _mm-l_
rn ;:U"';u r- ....
-l-- r- i!
enZ z m
-l~ Ci)
(") o o)t'lJo 0 "1J 0 )0- -0
z_
:;- :I: ~ c ~:c!
en 0 en'Tlz'Tl'Tl'Tl 0 Z C
-0 ~ ::jzen~OO z m ;u mo
8 CD 3: m>e:3:~S m ;u m 0."
Sl en ::j"1J
0 m zl"">-oz z <- en
~ .., en -l~>Ci) p O;u
r" Z .r-- z-
"ll - -l zO
:.a -f o -
r" C/) ~ Z ~'fi O;U
IC ~ -- ~>
S 0
Z 0"
~ C1I ?' mm
0
." 0
~ 0 >
;u I""
r
~ -l ." "ll
:... ::J: 0 ;u o 0 0 0 ~f
~ m ;U 0
z ;u 0 i:"1J(f):::Ei:
m m m ~:::~~~:::
~ >< z m
-l 0 ::J::!: m::J:3: "1J en
Z ~ en 'Tl2:!;U;U;u2:! m 0
!< ~ "ll ;u :I:
m -Z::J:::J:-Z
~ en ~Ci)00 Ci) :!: m
~ "1J ::l 0 C
::J m CD -l 1""'Tl00 ;u ::j
0 :::t (5 -"" - c:
." () Ze:e: z I""
~ -l 0 Z ~"1J"1J P m
6 ~ OJ C
z m
~ N ."
.... 0
~ :I: ;u
m -
~ 0 0
c: 0 000000 f~
;:u <
en m Ci) 'Tl'" om
Ed z ;u >;;;oO~ tl- ....
Z enmm:!:Ci) "\l 1ft
R- )0- Ci) !:"1J"1J"1J~
C ('
~ < ~>>>o
~ )0- >ooz:;;
z _mm-l- ....
0 ;U'Tl;U I"" i
""! !f1 -l-- I""
~ enz Z 1ft
-l~ Ci)
:; 0)(0 000000 "1J 0 )0- -0
Z_
oo :I: ~ C ~~
-0 o 0 :::E (I)"'z"''''''' 0 0
CD Z
g !l 000 ::jzen~OO Z m ;U mO
0 ;u ;u ;u ~>C:3:iS m ;u m ~."
::0 ;u " zl"">zoz z en
r" m m en p en -"1J
:.a o > ~ ~Ci)~Ci) O;u
-l -l z-
r" m 0 - zO
IC > - o Z 0
S 0 o en -l Z 0;:0
-l 'Tl
co ;u - )0 (5 ::!>
~ 01 ?' o 0
0 Z -l Z 0"
'Tl 0 > 0 mm
~ 0 > ~
;u I"" Z
r 0
~ -l ." "ll "1J
:... ::J: 0 ;u ;u
~ m ;u 0 0 000000
Z ;u 0 0
~ m m m m i:"1Jen;:Ei:"1J
>< z m m ml""~>ml""
-l 0 0 oC: -l0C:
Z ~ en ::J:3: m::J:3: 0
!< ~ "1J "1J en
~ en m 'Tl2:!::O::O;u2:! m 0 0
~ "1J ::l 0 -z::J:::J:-z ;U Z :I:
::J m CD -l ~Ci)00 Ci) :!: -l m
:::t
~ 0 () (5 1""'Tl00 ;u ::j ;U 0
-l 0 Z -"" - Z c:
6 ~ Zc:c: r
~ OJ ~"1J"1J P m
z m C
~ N ."
.... 0
~ :I: ::0
m
~ 0 0
c:
::0 0 ~ f
en < 000000
m ,
Ed z ~ 0
Ci)'Tl."om >
> z >;o;oO~ ....
R- Ci) ~mm3:Ci) ~ 1ft
0
~ < _"ll"1J"ll~
> ~>>>o -.J
~ Z ~
0 >ooz:;;
""! !f1 _mm-l_ ....
~ ;U'Tl;U I""
-l-- I"" i
enZ Z 1ft
-l~ Ci)
(") 000000 "1J ~ )0- -0
:I: C z_
~ 0 (I)"'z"''''''' 0 C ~:c!
3: ::jzen~OO z m ;u mo
;u 3: ~>e:3:~S m ;u m (')."
" zl"">ZCz Z en ::j"O
en m p en
)0 Z ~ ~Ci)~Ci) O;u
.r: z-
-l -f m 0 - zO
Ui (J) o Z 0
S ." .. -l Z O;u
co > (5 ::!!):
~ C1I 0
0 -l Z 0"
." 0 ~ mm
~ 0 > ~
;U I""
r;j -l I""
." "1J
:... :I: 0 ::0
~ m ;U 0 000000
Z ;U 0
~ m m m i:"1Jen;:Ei:"1J
>< m
-l Z 0 ml""~>ml""
:.a en oe: -loe:
2 ~ z ~ "1J ::J:i: m::J:3: "1J (')
~ en m .,,2:!;u;u::02:! m 0
~ "1J ::l 0 ZZ:I:::J:-Z ;u Z
CD
::l m :::t -l >Ci)00 Ci) !I: -l
~ 0 () (5 I""~~~ ~ ::j ;U
-l 0 Z
6 :a- Ze:e: Z
~ OJ ~"1J"1J P
Z :-! m
~ N ."
.... 0
~ :I: ::0 "
m
~ 0 0
c:
;u 0 \
<
en m
Ed z ;U
> Z
Roo ~ Ci)
~ -t:
>
~ Z
0
~ !f1 ....
i!
1ft
r
000000 "1J 0 > -(')
Z_
:I: ~ c ~:c!
en'Tlz'Tl'Tl'Tl 0 Z C
::jzen~OO Z m ;u mo
!!!)oC:3:~S m ;u m 0."
ZI"">-oz z en ::j"O
en .....~>Ci) p C/) O;u
"ll - ..... z-
m 0 - zO
o Z 0
..... Z 0::0
;;;; (5 ::!>
~ z 0"
mm
~ >
I""
I""
~ ..... 'Tl
:... J: 0
:.a m ;u DOOD~~
r" Z ;U
~ m !!! i:"1Jen;:Ei:
>< ml""~>ml""
..... Z oC: .....oc:
Z ~ en ::J:3: m::J:3: (')
!< ~ "1J "1J en
~ en m 'Tl2:!;U;U;u2:! m 0 0
" ~ "1J ::l 0 -z::J:::J:-z ;U Z :I:
::J m CD -4 ~Ci)00 Ci) :!: ..... m
0 :::t (5 1""'Tl00 ;U ::j ;U 0
~ ()
..... 0 Z -"" - Z c:
6 ~ OJ zcc: r
~"1J"ll p m
Z m 0
~ ."
N 0
....
~ :I: ::u
m
~ 0 0 t>"
c:
;u 0 f~
< 000000 ,
en m
Ed z ;U Ci)'Tl 'Tl om
> Z >;o;ijO~
Roo C Ci) ~mm3:Ci)
~ < _"1J"1J"1J~
> ~~~~o
;;; z >ooz:;;
""! 0 _mm....._
~ !f1 ;U'Tl::O I"" ....
.....-_ I"" i
enz z m
.....~ Ci)
:;- 0 0 0 (") oooo~ "1J 0 > -0
oo 0 :I: ~ C z_
-0 0 0 :::E en'Tlz'Tl'Tl'Tl 0 C ~:c!
g CD 0 0 0 3C ::jzen~oo z ;u
(') !l m mo
> 0 ;U ;U ;U 3: ~>C:i:iS m ;u m (')."
:-! ;U ;U " en
r" r m m m zl"">zoz z en ::!"1J
I"" en p
lIll t 0 0 > z ~ ~Ci)~Ci) O;u
..... ..... z-
t'!l ~ > ..... -t m 0 o~ zO
IC ~ en C/) i z Z?o
cD 0 O;u
S ..... ."
co ::0 (5 > ::!>
~ 01 ?' 0
0 Z ..... 0"
." 0 > 0 mm
~ 0 > Z ~
;u I""
r 0 ~
r;j ..... ." "ll "1J
:... :I: 0 ::0 ;u
~ m ;u 0 0 000000
Z ;u 0 0
~ m m m m i:"1Jen:::Ei:"1J
>< z m m mr~>ml""
..... 0 0 oC: .....oc:
:.a en
!< ~ Z ~ "ll ::J:i: m::J:3: "1J (') en
~ en m 'Tl2:!;U;U;u2:! m 0 0
"1J 0 zZ::J:::J:-Z ;u Z :I:
::l ~ m CD ..... >Ci)00 Ci) !I: -l m
0 :::t (5 I""~~~ ~ ::j ;U c
;;: ()
..... 0 Z Z c:
6 ~ Zc:c: r
~ OJ ~"1J"1J P m
Z m C
~ ."
N 0
....
~ :I: ::0
m
~ 0 0
c: 0
;u < 000000
en m
:il z ;U Ci)'Tl'Tlom
> Z >;;;oO~
Roo C Ci) ~mm:!:Ci)
~ ~ _"1J"1J"1J~
~ Z ~>>>o
(') >o(')z:;;
~ !f1 _mm....._ ....
;U'Tl::O I""
.....-_ r i
enz Z 1ft
.....~ Ci)
0)(0 0 00)(000 "1J 0 > -0
z_
:I: ~ c ~:c!
0 en."z"''Tl'Tl 0 c
8 0 ~ 3: ::jzen~oo z m ;0 mo
0 3: m>C:3:iS m ;0 m (')."
;U ;U ;U Z en ::j"1J
::0 ::0 " m zr>-cz C/)
en .....~>Ci) p 0;0
m m en Z z-
00> "ll - ..... -l3 zO
-f m 0 -
..... ..... ..... (J) o Z 0 0;0
> - ~ "'" Z
o en ~>
S ..... ." 0 0 --...;
;U - > Z --c:> 0"
~ ?' o 0 e mm
Z .....
0 > 0 ~
~ > Z ~
;0 r
r o .
~ ..... ." "ll "1J
:... :I: 0 ;U ;U 000000
m ;U 0 0
~ z ;U 0 0 i:"1Jen;:Ei:"1J
m m m m ml""~>ml"" Z
~ >< Z m m oC: .....oc:
..... 0 0 ::J:i: m::J:3: "1J 0 en
Z ~ en 'Tl2:!::o::o::o2:! m 0 r (')
!< "1J
~ ~ en m -Z::J:::J:-Z ;0 Z :I:
"1J ::l 0 ~Ci)00 Ci) :!: ..... m
" ~ CD ..... ::j ;u C
::l m :::t (5 1""'Tl00 ;U c:
0 -"" -
~ () Zc:c: Z r
..... 0 Z ~"1J"1J P m
~ 6 :a- OJ c
Z :-! m r to
~ N ."
.... 0
~ :I: ::0 "
m
~ 0 0
c: 0 000000
;U <
en m Ci)"''TlO~ t ~
Ed z ;U >;0;00
> Z enmm:!:Ci)
Roo C Ci) !:"1J"1J"1J~
~ < ~>>>o
~ > >ooz:;;
z _mm....._ ....
~ 0 ;U'Tl::O r i
!f1 .....-_ I""
enZ Z 1ft
.....~ Ci)
:;- o~o (") oooo~r ~ ~ )0- -(')
en 0 C z_
~ o 0 :::E en"'-'Tl'" C ~:c!
a 000 3: --Z~OO 0 ;0
!l .....zen c:o Z m mo
0 ;u ;u ;u 3C m>c::!:z..... m ;0 m (')."
~ :-! ::0 ::0 " zr>zcz ~ en ::j"1J
r" m m en m en
:.a 00> Z ~ :::!Ci)~Ci) . 0;0
r" '"'" ..... ..... -f m 0 - \S z-
IC > - (J) o z 0 zO
o en 0;0
S ..... ." ..... Z
- > (5 ::!>
~ o 0
z ..... Z 0"
0 > 0 mm
~ r Z ~
r o .
~ :I: ." "ll "ll (?\ ~
:... 0 ;u ;u
m 0 0 ~
~ ::0 ~, 000000
z ;u 0 0 ~ r
~ m m m m i:"1Jen;:Ei:"1J
>< z m m ml""~>ml""
..... 0 0 oC: -ioC:
>:l en c:
2 ~ z ~ "1J N :l:i: m::J:i: "1J (') en
~ en m 'Tl2:!::o::o::o2:! m 0 0
~ "1J ::l 0 ZZ::J:::J:-Z ;0 Z ~, :I:
::l m CD ..... >Ci)00 Ci) !I: ..... (" m
(') :::t (5 \ r'TlOO ;u ::j ?' c
~ () 0
..... 0 Z -"" - c:
~ 6 :a- OJ Zc:c: Z I""
~"1J"1J P m
z :-! m ...J c
."
~ N 0
....
:I: ;u
m
~ 0 0 ~
c: ('
;0 0 ?f~
<
en m 000000
Ed z ;u I
Ci)"''TlO~ \)~
> Z >;0;00
Roo 0 Ci) ~mm:!:Ci) ...,J \' m
~ < _"1J"1J"1J~
)0- ~>>>o
;;; z
() >ooz:;;
~ rn _mm....._ ....
::O'Tl::O r
.....-_ r i
enz z m
.....~ Ci)
~o 0 (") 0000).0 "0 0 )> -(')
:I: ~ C z_
0 0 :::E 0 C/)"'z"''''''' 0 0 ~~
0 0 0 3C ::jzen~oo z z ::u
m me
;u ;u ;u 3: ~>c3:iS m ;0 m ~."
;u ;u " zl"">zoz z en
m m C/) m p en -"1J
0 z ~ ~Ci)~Ci) O;u
-I > z-
> ..... -f m 0 - I"'- zO
~ 0 Ui C/) o Z 0 O;U
S ..... ." .. ..... Z
~ (5 > (5 ::!>
0
Z ..... Z 0"
> 0 mm
~ ;u Z ~
0
r;j ..... "ll "1J
:... :I: ;u ;u
~ m 0 0 000000
Z 0 0
~ m m m i:"1JC/)~i:"1J
>< m m ml""~>ml""
..... 0 0 oC: .....oc:
!< cs Z ~ ::J:3: m::J:3: "1J 0 en
~ en 'Tl2:!;U;U;u2:! m 0 0
~ "1J ::l zZ::J:::J:-z ;0 Z :I:
::J m CD >Ci)00 Ci) !I: ..... m
:::t
~ 0 () 1""'Tl00 ;u ::j ;U 0
..... 0 -"" - c:
6 ~ Zc:c: z r
~ Z ~"1J"1J P m
~ C
N ("
....
~ :I:
~ 0 6"
c: -
;u 000000 , f~
C/)
Ed Z Ci)'Tl."om
Roo )0- >;o;oO~
C ~mm3:Ci)
~ < _"1J"1J"1J~
> ~>>>o
;iJ Z
0 >ooz:;;
~ !f1 _mm....._ ....
;U'Tl;U r
.....-_ I"" i
C/)Z Z 1ft
.....~ Ci)
:;- i~ (") 00000\ "1J ~ )0- -0
en 0 :I: C z_
~ en'Tl-'Tl'Tl 0 C ~:c!
3: --z~oo z
8 0 Sl nI~~ c:o z m ;0 mo
)0- 0 3C m ;0 m 0'Tl
~ r :-! ::0 " -r>i:Z..... z en ::j"1J
r" m en m Z -0- en
r en .....~>~ p
:.a t o > . Z 0;0
..... ..... "ll - ..... z-
r" -f m 0 - zO
IC ~ > - o Z 0
. o en C/) ..... Z 0;0
S CD ~ ~
co 0 ~!):
~ C1I o 0
0 z ..... z 0"
." > 0 '= mm
~ 0 z ~
;0 0 -,
r;j ..... "1J "1J -.
::J: -
:... ;u ;u
~ m 0 0 000000
z 0 0
~ m m m i:"1Jen;:Ei:"1J
>< m m
..... z 0 0 ml""~>ml""
IltI C/) OC: .....oc:
~ ~ z ~ "1J ::J:i: m:l:3: "1J 0 en
en m 'Tl2:!::O;U;u2:! m 0 0
Cl ~ "1J ::l 0 ZZ:I:::J:-Z ;0 Z :I:
::l m CD ..... >Ci)oo Ci) :!: ..... m
(') :::t (5 1"".,,00 ;u ::j ;u l c
~ ()
..... 0 Z -"" - c:
~ 6 ~ OJ zc:c: z ~ r
~"1J"1J p m
Z m 0
~ 'Tl
N 0
....
~ :I: ::0
m
~ 0 0
c: 0 ~
;u < 000000
en m ~
Ed z ;u Ci)"''''om ~~
Z >;o;;o~ ~
Roo )0- Ci) "':oJiil
c ~mm3:Ci)
~ ~ _"1J"1J"1J~ ~
~ Z ~>~~o ("'\
(') >ooz:;;
~ _mm....._
rn ;o'Tl;:O r ....
.....-_ r i
C/)Z Z m
.....~ Ci)
~ 000000 "1J ~ )0- -(')
z_
:I: c ~:c!
:;- ~o en'Tlz'Tl'Tl'Tl 0 C
en ::jzen~OO z ;0 mO
"8 o 0 .=; m
000 m>c:!:iS m ;0 m (')."
a (') !l en ::j"1J
;u ::0 ::0 *r>zgz z en
)0- 0 ::0 ::0 " !=> O;u
~ I"" :-! m m (/) "1J ::!Ci).....Ci) z-
r" I"" 00> m 0 - zO
>a t ..... ..... ..... o Z 0 0;0
t'!l ;:E > - ..... Z
IC ~ o en ~>
S cD ..... ." (5 0"
co - > Z
~ C1I o 0 mm
0 Z .....
." > 0
~ 0 ~
;0 ~
~ -I 'Tl "1J 00 0 o~o
:... ::J: 0 ;u ;u
m ::0 0 0
~ Z 0 0 i:"1Jen;:El:"1J
;u m m ~:::~~~:::
~ m m m m
>< z en
..... 0 0 ::J:i: m::J:i:
Z ~ C/) l, 'Tl2:!::o;u::02:! 0
~ ~ "ll -z::J:::J:-z :I:
en m ~Ci)00 Ci) m
"1J ::l 0 0
" ~ CD ..... 1""'Tl00 ;u
::l m :::t c:
0 0 -"" - r
~ () 0 Zcc:
..... 0 Z ~"ll"1J m
0 ~ OJ 0
~ Z m t
~ N ."
.... 0
~ :I: ::0
m
~ 0 0
c: 0 000000
::0 <
en m Ci)'Tl'Tl0~
Ed Z ;u >--0
z C/)~~:!:Ci)
Roo )0- Ci) ...... C"1J"1J"1J~
C
~ ~ ~>>>o
> (')OZ:;;
~ z _mm....._
0 ;U'Tl;U I""
""! !f1 .....-_ r
~ enZ z
.....~ Ci)
000000 "1J 0 )0- -(')
z_
:;- f{D :J: ~ c ~:c!
en."z"''''''' 0 Z C
'" o ~ ::jzen~OO Z ::u me
-0 m
CD o 0 m>C:3:~S m ;0 m (')."
!l en ::j"1J
;u ~ ;u ~I"">zgz z en
0 p O;u
:-! m m " "ll ::!Ci).....Ci) z-
o 0 C/) zO
-I > m 0 -
> ~ o Z 0 0;0
..... Z
o en 0 ::!>
;u ~ ~ \ 0"
~ " 0 0 K) Z mm
~ Z ..... 6;
o > 0
~ > Z ;u '^'
;u F 0 :<
r;j ..... ." "ll "1J
:... :I: 0 ;u ;u 000000
m ;u 0 0
~ z ;u 0 0 i:"1JC/)~i:"1J
m m m m ~:::~~~:::
~ m m
>< Z 0 0 ::J:3: m::J:3: 0 en
..... "1J
>:l Z ~ C/) .,,2:!::O;U::02:! m 0 0
!< "1J :I:
~ m -Z::J:::J:-Z ;0 Z
~ en ~Ci)00 Ci) :!: ..... m
"1J ::l 0 0
" ~ CD ::j ;U
::J m ..... 1"".,,00 ;u c:
0 :::t (5 -"" - r
." () Zc:c: Z
..... 0 Z ~"ll"1J P m
~ 6 ~ OJ 0
Z m
~ N ."
.... 0
~ :I: ::0 ~
m
~ 0 0
c: 0 ,
;0 < ~
C/) m O~
....
Ed z ;u m
Z
Roo )0- Ci)
c
~ <
>
~ z ....
""! 0 i
~ !f1 1ft
o~ (") 000000 "1J 0 )0- -(')
:J: ~ 0 z_
o ~ 0 en."z."."." 0 C ~:<
a e 0 3: ~zen~oe z m ::u me
;u ;u 3: !!!>C:;r:~S m ;0 m (')."
~ ;u " zl"">zoz z en ~"1J
r" m C/) m p en
:.a o > Z ~ ~Ci)~Ci) 0;0
z-
r" ..... -f m 0 - zO
IC Ui (J) o z 0 0;:0
S ." -l Z
> 0 ::!!):
~ 0 z 0"
~ mm
~
r;j
:...
~ 000000 S
~ i:"1Jen;:E3:"1J
mr~>mr -
>if OC .....oc
~ ~ ~ ::J:i: m::J:i: "1J 0 en
.,,2:!;u;u::02:! m 0 0
::l -Z::J:::J:-Z ;0 Z :I:
" ~ CD ~Ci)00 Ci)
::J :::t !I: -l m
;;: () 1"".,,00 ;u ::j ;U 0
0 -"" - z c:
:a- zc:c: r
~ ~"1J"1J P m
:-! C
~
~
~ ";:s:o 0 0 0 0 i
Ed Ci)"''''0~ ~
>;0;:;0 ....
Roo ~mm3:Ci) m
~ _"1J"1J"1J~
~ ifi>>>o
>(')(');2:;;
~ _mm....._ ....
;u.,,;u r
.....-_ I"" i!
enZ z m
.....~ Ci)
oX (") 000000 "1J ~ )> -(')
z_
:I: C ~~
.' 0 C/)"'z"''''''' 0 0
0 ~ 3C ::jzen~oo z m ;0 mo
0 3: m>C:3:iS m ;0 m (')."
;u ;u zr>-oz z en ::j"1J
en
::0 " m ~ ~~~Ci) p 0;0
m C/) Z z-
0 zO
:-, ..... > -f m 0 -
r" ..... C/) o Z 0 0::U
IC Ui ..... Z ::!!):
S cO ." 0
co ::0 > Z (')"
~ 01 ?' 0 mm
0 .....
." 0 0
~ 0 > ~
;0 I"" ~
r
~ ..... ." "ll
:... :I: 0 ::0 000000
m ::0 0
~ Z ;u 0 i:"1Jen~i:"1J
m m ~i~~~i
~ m m
>< Z
..... 0 "1J (') en
:.a Z ~ C/) .,,2:!;:O;U;u2:! m 0 r 0
2 ~ "1J ~ -Z::J:::J:-Z ;0 Z :I:
en m ~Ci)00 Ci) !I: -l m
~ "1J ::l 0 C
::l ~ m CD ..... 1"".,,00 ;u ::j ;U c:
::l. (5 -"" -
~ 0 () Zc:c: Z ~ r
..... 0 Z ~"1J"1J P m
~ 6 :a- OJ c
Z :-! m U)
~ N -n
.... 0 S
~ :I: ::0
m J
~ 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0
c: 0
;0 < ~
en m ~ Ci)"''''o~
....
Ed z ;u ~. > :ii :ii 0 1ft
)0- Z C/)mm3:Ci)
Roo C Ci) ~~~~~
~ <
)0- moo-!2
~ z _mm~~ ....
(') ;u"'::o r i!
~ !" .....__ r m
enz z
.....~ Ci)
T
o}( (") 000000 "1J 0 )0- -(')
0 :J: ~ C z_
o :::E en."z"''''''' 0 C ~~
g o 0 3: ::jzen~OO z m ;0 mo
;u ;u 3: ~>C:3:iS m ;0 m (')."
::0 " zr>zcz Z en ::j"1J
r" m C/) m 9 en
:.a o > Z ~ ~Ci)~Ci) 0;0
..... -l z-
t'!l -f m 0 - zO
> - o z 0
IC o en (J) 0;0
S ..... ." ..... Z
- > (5 ::!!):
~ ?' o 0
z ..... z 0"
." 0 > 0 mm
~ 0 > z ~
;0 r
r o .
r;j ..... ." "1J "1J
:... :I: 0 ::0 ::0
~ m ;U 0 0 )ooo'lQ.o
z ;U 0 0
~ m m m m "1Jen;:Ei:"1J
>< Z m m mr~>ml""
..... 0 0 OC -lOC
C/)
!< ~ Z ~ "ll ::J:i: m::J:3: "1J (') en
~ en m .,,2:!;u;u::02:! m 0 0
"1J ::l 0 zZ::J:::J:~z ;0 Z :I:
" ~ CD
::J m ..... >Ci)00 Ci) !I: -l m
0 :::t (5 ::j ;U c
~ () I"" ." 0 0 t;u
..... 0 Z -"" - z c:
~ 6 :a- OJ ~~c:c: r
p m
z :-! m ~ r "1J "1J C
~ ."
N 0 ",,-
.... ~
~ :I: ::u ~
m f,
~ 0 0
c: 0 oooot?~ l
;0 <
en m
Ed z ;U Ci)"''''o~~ I ~
)0- Z >;0;00 ~R ....
Roo Ci) ~mm3:Ci) m
C
~ ~ Z~~~~~21\
~ z moo-S2
0 ~mm~:!!
3 rn ::0"'::0 r ....
.....__ I"" i!
enZ z m
.....~ Ci)
5" 0 g} (') 000000 "tJ e )0 -0
Z_
'" 0 :r == c ~~
"'0 0 CII'TlZ'Tl'Tl'Tl 0 C
(1) 0 s: Z
g 0 51 ::::jZ(l)~OO z m " me
> ~ ;0 ;0 ;0 i: ~>c:~~S m ;0 m 0'Tl
, ;0 ;0 '" Z'!j,:ZCZ Z (I) ::1"tJ
~ , m m (I) m 9 (I)
:ll:l 0 o > z !G ::1(;)~(;) 0;0
t -4 z-
~ ~ -4 -4 -4 m 0 - zO
.... > - o z 0
~ I o (I) en 0"
S co -4 'Tl -4 Z ~
co ;0 - > (5 ::1!j,:
~ UI ?' o 0
0 Z -4 Z 0",
'Tl 0 > 0 N mm
~ 0 > Z ~
;0 ,
, C .
~ -4 'Tl "tI "tI
. ::t 0 ;0 ;0
~ m ;0 0 0 000000
Z ;0 0 0 ~
~ m m m m ~"tI(I)::e~"tI
>< Z m m m'~>m'
-4 C C 0C: -40C: "-
::.a Z ~ CII :r~ m:r~
~ (:5 "tI "tI 0 ~ (I)
~ (I) m "T1!!!;o;o;o!!! m 0 0
"tI ::l 0 ZZ:r:r-Z ;0 z ::t
::! ~ m (1) -4 >(;)00 (;) ;: -4 m
::t
~ 0 () (5 ''TlOO ;0 ::::j ;U C
-4 0 Z -"'''' - Z c:
0 3- Zc:c: ,
~ [lJ ~"'ll"'ll 9 m
Z :-1 m 0
~ N 'Tl
"" 0
~ J: ;0
m
~ e 0
c: 0 -
;0 < DDDDll I
CII m
~ Z ;0 (;)'Tl'TlO 1: ~
> Z >--0 -4
~ (;) CII~~~ m
0 ~
~ ~ C"'ll"tl"tl
z!j,:!j,:!j,:
~ Z moo-
0 ~mm~
~ !T1 ;o'Tl;o , -4
-4-- , i
(l)z Z m
-4~ (;)
J10b.-()~1i-
/
White - Building
Canary - Engineering
Pink - Planning
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST
NAME OF APPLICANT q/c;Cr57G/l/E C C/vS-~
APPLICATION RECEIVED f}. .-::; C &:
The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit
application for construction activity which is proposed at:
4- 727 /J;-} IG/~ IVI (!/( L L [; / If /'/6/\/0 ~
?-/Ii L rl1 E < o/V//<;t.. k{!,6 L/L u 9 .
Accepted With Corrections
'-A
Accepted
Denied
Reviewed By: a f?, Date: q Il 7 laG
Comments: See Reverse Sid~ for Additional Informationl '
As. Q..,..' ( -\ S
re'1 lJ J -~c/
f ("'.' ~.--
...f.-~
C e r {- 't/ c-h.k ~P-
c c~ I (
OC~ "-' f~-C.I
9.:; l - '-Ic..( 7 - ? &-1~
~-
\, .1
..J f .' ,. f..-1
\ ..~
I '" '/'< c f. ' 'V '--.,
'R,-J.
"""" "-' s.-I- be.
((>,,-1,\.(\ (C... 4
(. fe,... .-teA d ~r 1.. f(" J iJ.-
~r 0 r:cvrc"l. .......<.Y
/
I~
See Attachments: 1) Grading Plan. 2) Erosion Control M,easures
"The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and
computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of
any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits
presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid."
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS
. Surface storm water drainage flowing to the perimeter of this lot to
and from adjoining properties must be conveyed to the roadway
and/or to the rear of the lot in drainage swales wjthin the drainage
easement.
. All bare soil areas must be protected from eroding into neighboring
properties through the properly installed and maintained silt fence or
bales.
. The silt fence required by the erosion control plan must be installed
prior to any earthwork being started.
. The builder is responsible for maintaining the erosion control
measures until the turf is established.
.- "The rock construction entrance must be installed at the time of
backfilling of the foundation.
"
...
6:\^dmin\dcpt Info\^DbInON^L COMMENTS FOR BUILD'INS PERMIT ^PPUC^1'IONS.doc
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT,
TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE
AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT
Date Rec' d
&..3. tj'
White
Pink
Yf!llow
I PERMIT NO.
File
City
Applicant
e or rint and si8!1 at bottom
ADDRESS +7Z9 PI'lJe~ N/~CLL&r /lVe.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only)
ZOe~ffi~U~)
LOT / BLOCK / ADDITION Vd/Ct!Je CC7 rnme re-e ffcld/t-"~f1 PID
OWNER C
(Name) Vi; / q ~q q, -0 mh1e rc.e
(Address) / tf 093
BfA i/d/r1q I LL 6
V'
~ke
(Phone) q5;)- 'itf 7- 50;). 6
5537;).
BUILDER G/" /'
(Company Name) reysfof7€ unS I-rucnOI1 C-ot11,fJ~f1 y
(Contact Name) (7orcl/e ~h(Y7/t.z.
(Address) 500 S; (Y7a.r5chc,,/1 Road SuIte
(Phone) 9~-;2- 49~ - ;};).;;)7
(Phone) q 5;;< - '-f 9 C; - ').;);;J. 7
MAl 5"5 q
TYPE OF WORK !sifNew Construction ODeck o Porch ORe-Roofing ORe-Siding
'tJAddition OAlteration o Utility Connection 0 Mise.
CODE: DI.R.C. jX1'I.B.C.
Type of Construction: r;;'\ I
Occupancy Group: A \.!!! E
Division:
@
F
I
m IV
H I
2 J
V
M
4
OLower Level Fimsh
o Fireplace
2.1- lYIi//i~/1
A
R
5
PROJECT COST IV ALUE S
(excluding land)
B
S U
I hl'Teby certify that I have furnished information on this application which is 10 the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certify that I am the owner or authOrized agent for the
perty and "'t aU construction will conform to all existing state and local laws and will proceed in accordance with submitted plans. I am aware that the building
this permit rjJSI ause. Furthcrmore. I hereby agree that the city official or a designce may enter upon the property 10 perform needed IOspectinns.
P -Gre S N / A '? /3 /Ob
Contractor's License No. . 'Date
x
Permit Valuation
Permit Fee $
Plan Check Fee $
State Surcharge $
Penalty $
Plumbing Permit Fee $
Mechanical Permit Fee $
Sewer & Water Permit Fee $
Gas Fireplace Permit Fee $
This Application Becomes Your Building Pennit When Approved
Buildinlt Oflicinl
Dnle
Park Support Fee # $
SAC # $
Water Meter Size 5/8"; I"; $
Pressure Reducer $
Sewer/Water Connection Fee # $
Water Tower Fee # $
Builder's Deposit $
Other $
TOTAL DUE $
I Paid
Date
Receipt No_
By
ThIS IS to certify that thc request in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and mny proceed as rcqul'sled. This document
when signed by the City Planner constitutcs a temporary Certificale of Zoning compliance and allows construction to commence Before occupancy, a Certificate of Occupancy must be
issued
Planning Director
Date Special Conditions, if any
24 hour nolice for all inspections (952) 447-9850, fAX (952) 447-4245
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372
PRIOR LAKE
INSPECTION RECORD
DEPARTMENT OF
BUILDING AND INSPECTION
SITE ADDRESS .41tl ?Ae-~ N\c..oL-t.-~AvE 56-
NATURE OF WORK NGw V\l-t..A..c::>C:. C<?",t't~ ~''-CI,.J0
USE OF BUILDING \ I c;.- r-J e:.\10
PERMIT NO. Db - B?t DATE ISSUED
CONTRACTOR ~oG~ ~r. Co PHONE~~Z..~b"'ZZL.7
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT FOR ANY OF THE INSPECTIONS BELOW
THE PERMIT IS BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT
FOOTING
FOUNDATION (Prior to Backfill) 16
PLACE NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEE
ROUGH - INS
SEWER I WATER I SEPTIC
FRAMING 'B
INSULATION
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING u z." Dl
HEATING (if required)
E..
GAS LINE AIR TEST I · Z'S'- 07
COVER NO WORK UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED
I SPl"-(,.Jl"-L~, II" 'H~ I e.12 I J/Z.2./67
H7~ 'I&Jt1? FINALS I
GRADING (Prior to Sodding)
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING
HEATING
DO NOT
--.- --
-~"'--- ~.
I
Vrk
HAS BEEN SIGNED
This card must be posted near an electrical service cabinet prior to rough-in inspections
and maintained until all inspections have been approved. On buildings and additions
where no service cabinet is available, card shall be placed near main entrance.
FOR ALL INSPECTIONS (952) 447-9850
:;- 0 0 0 () o ~o 0 0 0 "0 0 > -0
en :I: ~ 0 z_
~ 0 0 ~ 0 en."z"''''''' 0 C ~~
8 0 !l 0 0 0 s:: ::jzen~oo z m ;0 mo
> 0 ;u ::0 ::0 3: m>c co m ;u m 0."
~ I"" :-! ::0 :n " -1"">3:Z-l z en ::!"O
r" m m m Z -Oz en
I"" 0 0 C/) en .....ts>Ci) 9 O;u
~ t -l -l > Z "ll - ..... z-
~ > ..... -f m 0 - ;:::. ZO
to ..., iii C/) o z 0
S cD 0 ." ..... Z 0;0
co ;u ..... > 0 ..::J ::!>
~ 01 ?' (5 0
0 z ..... z .-- 0"
." 0 > 0 ~ mm
~ 0 > Z ;u
;0 r .-<
I"" 0
r;j :i! ." "1J "1J
~ 0 ;u ;0 ~
~ m ;u 0 0 000000
z ;u 0 0
~ m !!! m m :I:"llC/):::Ei:"1J -r
>< m m
-l Z 0 0 ml""~>mr
~ C/) oC: .....oc
~ ;:s z ~ "1J xi: m::J:3: "0 0 en
en m u .,,!!1;u::O::o2:! m 0 0
0 ~ "1J ::l 0 , j zZxx-z ;0 z :x:
::J m CD ..... >Ci)oo Ci) :!: ..... m
:::t
~ 0 0 (5 i, d r."OO ;u =i ;U 0
::I 0 z -"" - c:
~ 0 ::l OJ zcc Z I""
:; ~"1J"1J 9 m
z m 0
."
~ N 0
~
:I: ;u ~OOOOOO 6'
m
~ 0 0
c 0
;u <
en m (!) to
5:1 z ;u ,j
z Ci)"'."o~ -..J :zs ~
)0- >;0;;0
R0- o Ci) ~mm3:Ci) -C:. ~
~ ~ _"1J"1J"1J~
~S:>>O
~ Z >ooz:;;
~ 0 _mm....._
!f1 ;u.,,;u I"" ....
.....-- I"" i
C/)Z Z m
.....~ Ci)
:;- 0 0 0 ("') o~o 0 0 0 "1J 0 )> -C)
z_
en 0 :J: ~ 0 ~~
"8 0 0 :::E C/)."-.".".,, 0 0
0 0 3: --Z~oo z ;u
g 0 n- O -iZen co m mo
:n :n ;u 3: !!!>C:3:z-t m ;u m ~."
> 0 ;:0 ;0 en
:-! " zl"">zoz Z
r" r m m m 9 en -"1J
r- 0 0 C/) Z ~ ::!Ci)~Ci) O;u
:>tl t -t ..... > z-
t'!l ..... -f m 0 - zO
IC ~ ~ > Ui (J) o Z 0 0::0
cD 0 ..... Z
~ ..... ." (5 ::!>
co ;U (5 >
~ C1I ?' 0 Z 0"
0 Z ..... mm
." 0 )> 0 ci
~ 0 > Z ;U
;U r 0 .-<
r-
~ ..... 'T1 "ll "1J
:... ::J: 0 ;U ;U
~ m ;U 0 0 000000
Z ;U 0 0
~ m m m m 3: "1JC/):::E3:"1J
>< z m m ml""~>ml""
..... 0 0 OC .....oc
:.a Z ~ C/) ::J:3: m::J:3: "ll 0 en
~ C5 "ll .,,2:!;u;u;u2:! m 0 0
C/) m
" ::l 0 -Z::J:::J:-Z :u Z :J:
<:> ~ CD ~Ci)00 Ci) :!: -i m
::J m .....
:::t (5 I""~~~ ~ ~ ;U 0
'1l 0 C) c:
~ ~ 0 z zc:c Z I""
0 ::l OJ ~"1J"1J 9 m
Z q m 0
<::l N ."
~ "" 0
:J: ;U
m
~ 0 0 '""'-...J
C 0 ~
;:0 < 000000
C/) m
Ed z ;U Ci)"''''o~
> Z - ,J >;0;00 ~
Roo Ci) ~mm3:Ci)
0 _"1J"1J"1J~
~ <
)> ifi>>>o
~ Z >ooz:;;
C) _mm....._
~ !f1 ;u.,,;u r ....
.....z- C i
C/)> Z m
.....1"" Ci)
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT,
TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE
AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT
Date Rec' d
E.3.t;'
ADDRESS .JI-"'f I' . 0 ~M*
or'f 7 PI'IN~ N/~~ter /IV,.,. SJ:;.
I. White File I PERMIT
2. Pink City NO.. l/ / '1 _ 81 A
J Yellow Appliam . ~ _+
ZOeC:;ffi~ u~)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only)
LOT J BLOCK I ADDITION V///a e Cc rnme rc..-e /fdcl/-t-'''11 PID
(Address) / 'f 093
ComlY1erc.e Bui/d/rJq, LLC
v~
'E
OWNER
(Name) Vi/lqqQ.
-
I-.a ke
(Phone) q5~- Lf'l 7- 5G;).. 6
5537;;..
BUILDER G Ce . Co
(Company Name) reysfone nsfn,(cncf/ rnf(i(ny
(Contact Name) (7orol/e S:.-h m/-t.z.
(Address) 500 S, /Yla. rs en",) I R 00l d Su ite
(phone) 95":2- 49(, - ;;(;);;)7
(Phone) q 5~- '1-9"- ').;);). 7
MAl t;;"5 q
TYPE OF WORK lsa'New Construction ODeck o Porch ORe-Roofing ORe-Siding OLower Level Fimsh 0 Fireplace
'E!Addition OAlteration OUtility Connection 0 Misc.
CODE: DI.R.C. ~I.B.C.
Type of Constmction: t"-;;'\ I
Occupancy Group: A ~ E
Division:
@
F
1
IDlY
H I
2 J
V A c:lP
M R S U
4 5
PROJECT COST /V ALUE S
(excluding land)
:let/- IYIjl!Jp/}
I hereby certify that I have furnished information on this application which is to the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certify that I am the owner or authol'lzed agent for lhe
above-mentIoned perty and t all construt'lion will conform to all existing stale and local Jaws and will proceed in accordance with submilled plans. I am aware that the building
official can 0 [his permit st ause. Furthermore, I hereby agree that the city official or a designee may enter upon the property to perform needed mspct'lions.
# -GreS'/1e N/A ~/3/~b
Contractor's License No. ' 'Date
Permit Valuation Zi Park Support Fee $ S9_
Permit Fee9( ~ 5t5~()- S SAC S it> Sf;c...
,
Plan Check Fee $ Water Meter S
State Surcharg IlL:' $ Pressure Reducer S
Penalty S Sewer/Water Connection Fee/;;lO #7 S Ib" S-a'},-
Plumbing Permit Fee S Water Tower Fee (ZX) #7 $ 7t?(;:t?, -
Mechanical Permit Fee S Builder's Deposit S
Sewer & Water Permit Fee S Other $
Gas Fireplace Permit Fee S TOTAL DUE $
I Paid s~ 3(;,.1. ~
. Date yz.ev(c..0
f
I Receipt NOlf, 5 z.4.SB
By /!IJ .
thIS IS to certify that the requesl in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as requL'Stcd. This ~()cumcnt
when signed by the City Planner constitutes a temporary Certificate of Zoning compliance and allows construction to commence. Before occupancy, a ClTlificate of Occupancy must be
~ued ~ ~
f?- :27-06
~ Metropolitan Council
~IY 10, 2006
Environmental Services
Bob Hutchins
Building Official
City of Prior Lake
17073 Adelmann St.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-3968
Dear Mr. Hutchins:
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division has determined SAC for the Village
Commerce Building to be located within the City of Prior Lake.
This project should be charged 8 SAC Units, as determined below. The Council understands this
building is speculative office building.
SAC Units
Charges:
Office (Speculative)
18786 s.f. @ 2400 s.f./SAC
Total Charges:
7.83
7.83 or 8
When the finishing permits are issued, the SAC assignment should be reviewed based on actual usage.
If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1119.
Sincerely, @
\L~~
Roger J anzfg U ~)
Senior Planner
Municipal Services Section
RJ:jn 060710A4
1/Of1 It- ~
l ~q) (1 ~ P&"O ~(_("L7.--
t:" fz"l- '1 Skc-U~{"'S
-v.. .\PIIA.7
cc: S. Selby, MCES
Gordie Schmitz, Greystone Construction Company
www.metrocouncil.org
390 Robert Street North. St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 . (651) 602-1005 · Fax (651) 602-1477 · TIY (651) 291-0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Date Rec'd
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
SEWER AND WATER PERMIT
9.19. Oft;
1. Green File
2. Yellow City
3. Gold Applicant
ZONING (office use)
~
Nle ()L-Lv~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only)
LOT
BLOCK
ADDITION
PID
OWNER
(Name)
(Phone)
(Address)
(Address)
(City)
(Zip Code)
'i~iANT el..v-4 1i!t4-' i EKt::..,fi~. .~
~~ress) 2(p2s'7 0; I/. -z5 &I{( flu/he
~ctPerson) (Adrlre"l2a u s b:. (:::~e)
~ICAN1' SIGNATURE
'7?2 g~3- ~/57..
i 5"t.o (!) / /
(Zip Code)
.\..::' l." ~ ','
........
J)ATE
APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE BELOW
Size of water service inches.
Location of any couplings from structure _ feet.
Type of sewer pipe. 0 ABC 0 PVC 0 Cast Iron
Estimated length of sewer line _ feet.
Clean out (if required) located at _ feet from structure.
Residential sewer and water line connection
Sewer connection only
FEE SCHEDULE
$35.50 Industrial, Com'l & Multi-family I % of job cost with a $39.50 minimum
$17.50 Water connection only $17.50
;..ated Cost $ '2.0, 15t>C. 00 Building Permit #
SEWER AND WATER PERMIT FEE
STATE SURCHARGE
TOTAL PERMIT FEE
$
$
$
'2 O~. CJU
.50
~CvrV
(Office Use Only)
This Application Becomes Your Building Permit When Approved
p-
0, ('2; ( 0 C
Date
Paid /<J('" rv
Date q~Yt ,()("
. t No. 5U44--
Building Official
24 hour notice for all inspections (952) 447-9850, fax (952) 447-4245
] White
Pink
Yellow
Date Rec' d
, I. zB. oft;
Rt-e- w'/ ~(,. 814-
[ PERMIT NO. O(P. /03/
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT,
TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE
AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT
File
City
Applicant
(Please
ADDRESS
ZONING (office use)
+111
,P /1 /C.K.. All UJ (."l/6 r /We
VIi-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only)
LOT
BLOCK
ADDITION
PID 2,S".39/. 1)(;'2,. ()
OWNER
(Name)
(Phone)
(Address)
BUILDER
(Company Name) t::>A-t;:;.~ r-A-
(Contact Name) 3~c:So
MJ
\
L) ~
t LV",",Ol,A.)"
(L. G:-N N E:-~c:-
N ~5" 1'1-'-
(Phone) "=>51- 454 -~~"\5
(Phone)
(Address)
TYPE OF WORK 0 New Construction ODeck OPorch ORe-Roofing ORe-Siding OLower Level Finish 0 Fireplace
OAddition OAlteration o Utility ConnectIOn
CODE: DI.R.C. DI.B.c.
Type of Constmction:
Occupancy Group: A B
Division:
o Mise.
I
E
II
F
I
III
H
2
IV V
I M
3 4
A
R
5
B
S U
PROJECT COST IV ALUE
(excluding land)
$
I hereby certify that I have hlrnished mformatlOn on this applicatIOn which IS to the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certIfy that I am the owner or authOrIzed agent Iln the
above-mentIOned property and that all construction WIll confllrm to allexlstmg state and local laws and WIll proceed 10 accordance with submitted plans I am aware that the blllldmg
official can revoke thIS permit tilr Just ca~l hereby agree that the CIty official or a deSignee may enter upon the propelty to perform needed mspectlons
X p -Q -'-- Lt ( "S -, f> ~>-- ( \ ( f'" {O""'
Signature Contractor's License No. Date
Permit Valuation Park Support Fee #
Permit Fee $ SAC #
Plan Check Fee $ Water Meter Size 5/8"; 1", 32..5". ~
State Surcharge $ Pressure Reducer 100, -
Penalty $
Plumbing Permit Fee $ Water Tower Fee #
Mechanical Permit Fee $ Builder's Deposit
Sewer & Water Permit Fee I $ Other - ~tZ-.
Gas Fireplace Permit Fee $ TOTAL DUE
ThiS IS to certify that the request In the above applicatHm and accompanYll1g documents is 1I1 accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may prncel'd as requested ThiS document
when signed by the City Planner constitutes a temporary Certlticate of ZOl1lng compliance and allows CDnstructlon to commence. Before occupancy, a Ccrtlficate llf Occupancy mllst be
isslIed
Planning Director
Special Conditions, if any
Date
24 hour notice for all inspections (952) ....7-9850, fax (952) 447-"245
4646 Dakota Street Prior Lake, MN 55372
c:005 13: 05
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
9524474245 P.02
Date Rec'd
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLUMBING PERMIT
I. BI... VI..
1 Gold CiLjJ
3. '1'.,....., ^ppli<Ull
/1. ~.Oh
riLE wj o~ 0874-
PERMIT NO. 0 ". 1030
p(\~1<. Nt.C-aLJ.-,fT Av€
I zONING(_~l I
LEGAL DEsCRIPTION (office we onlY)
LOT
BLOCK
ADDITION
PID '2.5. 3<1/. 00 z... 0
OWNER
(Name)
Vl:LL~&-e
Ce> Vl1 IV) -€ a.. c €.
(3L(J (y,
(Phone)
(Address)
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
H ttIJ5CfJ
/L.'#~
(Phone) (;S-/- 4s-4 - (;&4r
{;:If&ft,.:} J m tJ. SSf 22.-
(City) (Zip Code)
(psI-4S4- C;~~S-
11_ I -0 ~
(Phone)
APPLICANT D 1) 1..
(Name) Aj(CTA rL..U fl1 SrrJ& ~ 1+ r-Cr.
(Address) 3~S-O kovlVe13€.C O~~VG */()2
(Address)
::rCJ~N
(Contact Person)
DATE
Quantity Type of Fixture Quantity Type 0'( Fixture
Bath Tub with or without shower Rough.ins
Dishwasher t Water Heater
~ Floor Dra.in Water Softner
~ Lavatory (Bathroom Sink) Stand Pipe (Washing Machine)
Laundry Tray (lor 2 c:omparnnent sink Sewage Ejec:tor
Shower Stall . Backtlow Assembly v1)
'2.. Sinks Backflow Assembly Test
Bar Sink -. Lawn Sprinkler
G, Water Closet (Toilet) , Other €(.(:y~1Z- b''''Wlf {J;t;J~
I'
APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE BELOW
J.. W ^,Teil- u;:.~ ~ ~ ~;~I\ t-
FEE SCHEDULE
Industrial, Commerc;ial & Multi-family 1 % ofjllb cost with a $39.50 minimum Residential, New One & Two-Family $99.50
Residential. Additions & Alterations $39.50
LL,: OeJO -=-4
Estimated Cost $ r", I -
Building Permit #
.},._~ 2-~~r~
k-......... 8~'L.
;te;e~ or-cA!J!. #HJII~
II, (,.tJ{, 1# SA~I?) - r
Receipt No. 5Zf&, S b
By
PLUMBING PERMIT FEE $
STATE SURCHARGE $
TOTALPERNUTFEE $
1{, i:J e--
.50
tK~ SO
Paid .f 85. 50
Date //"1' .d~
14 hour noti~ Cor- all Inspections (951) 447-9850. fall (952) 447-4245
16200 Eagle CreBkA.\le.. S.E.. Prior Lake, MN 55372.-1714
TOTAL P.02
--"
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY
Division of Construction Codes and Licensing
REPORT ON PLANS
Plans and specifications on plumbing: Village Commerce Building, Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota,
Plan No. 07560'6
OWNERSHIP:
SUBMITTER(S): Dakota Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 3650 Kennebec Drive, Suite 102, Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Plans Dated:
Date Received: September 6, 2006
Date Reviewed: September 27, 2006
SCOPE: This review is limited to the design of this particular project only insofar as the provisions of the
Minnesota Plumbing Code, as amended, apply, and does not cover the water supply or sewerage system to which
this plumbing system is connected. The review is based upon the supposition that the data on which the design is
based are correct, and that necessary legal authority has been obtained to construct the project. The
responsibility for the design of structural features and the efficiency of equipment must be taken by the project
designer. Approval is contingent upon satisfactory disposition of any requirements included in this report.
Special care should be taken to insure that the material and installation of the plumbing system are in accordance
with the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. A copy of the approved plans and specifications should
be retained at the project location for future reference.
A set of the identified plans and specifications is being returned to Dakota Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Enclosed is
a copy of the report and transmittal letter to be forwarded to the project owner.
INSPECTIONS: All plumbing installations must be tested and inspected in accordance with the requirements of
the Minnesota Plumbing Code. As specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2830, no plumbing work may be
covered prior to completing the required tests and inspections. Provisions must be made for applying an air test
at the time of the roughing-in inspection as outlined in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 2, of the code.
A manometer test, as specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 3, is required at the time of the
finished plumbing inspection. It is the responsibility of the contractorlinstaller to notify the Minnesota
Department of Labor and Industry when an installation for a state contract job, licensed facility, or project in an
area where there is no local administrative authority is ready for an inspection and test. To schedule inspections,
contact the state plumbing standards representative for your region, or call Jim Peterson at 651/284-5889.
REQUlREMENT(S):
1. A minimum horizontal separation of 10 feet must be maintained between the water service and any sewer,
whenever possible. All underground sections of building drain and building sewer pipe located within
10 feet horizontally of underground water service pipe must be constructed in accordance with Minnesota
Rules, part 4715.1710, subpart 2. Where the water service crosses the building sewer, they must be
constructed as specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.1710, subpart 2(E).
2. Elevator pit drains must discharge to the sanitary sewer through an indirect connection which precludes the
possibility of sewage backup into the pit. If a sump is used, a dry-pan drain must discharge to the sump; the
sump must be located outside the elevator pit; and a pump must be installed. The waste pipe from the sump
shall discharge indirectly to the sanitary waste system through a fixture that is trapped and vented (see
Minnesota Rules, part 4715.1305). In addition, the sump must be designed in accordance with Minnesota
Rules, part 4715.2440. A gate valve and check valve must be provided on the sump pump discharge line,
must be accessible and located outside of the sump. A cover must be provided that is fastened or secured as
to prevent entry by children, and must be adequate to support anticipated loads in area of use.
Village Commerce Building
Plumbing
Plan No. 075606
Page 2
September 27,2006
3. The direct connection between a potable water supply and the lawn irrigation system shall be provided with
an approved backflow preventer in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2110, T, and
part 4715.2100.
4. Equipment used for heating water or storing hot water shall be protected by approved safety devices in
accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2210 and part 4715.2230. Verify that a temperature and
pressure relief valve exists.
5. A 1 Y2-inch diameter vent is shown to be serving the two first floor back-to-back water closets on Sheet P-4.
The minimum diameter vent for any water closet shall not be less than 2 inches in diameter (see Minnesota
Rules, part 4715.2520, subpart 6).
6. No water pipe sizes were shown for the individual supply branches to the flush valve water closets or to the
urinals. The minimum pipe size to any flush valve water closet is 1 inch in diameter. Urinals equipped with
flush valves must be provided with a %-inch minimum water supply branch (see Minnesota Rules,
part 4715.1730, subpart 2).
7. The roof drains must discharge to an approved place of disposal. In no case shall water from the roofs be
allowed to flow upon the public sidewalk. This shall include the overflow roof drains.
8. Materials used for the water service must comply with the standards specified in Minnesota Rules, part
4715.0510. Ductile iron pipes must meet ANSI Standards A21.15 or A21.51 or AWWA Standards C11S or
C 151. Copper pipes must meet ASTM Standard B88.
9. Solvent weld joints in PVC and CPVC pipe must include use of a primer which is of contrasting color to the
pipe and cement (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0810, subpart 2).
10. The plans and specifications were prepared by a licensed master plumber. The plumber who has prepared
the plans is the only one that can use the plans for construction. If another plumber is contracted to install
the plumbing, they must submit their own plans and specifications for the project.
NOTE(S):
1. The scope of this project consists of the construction of a new building. The plumbing installation includes
water closets, urinals, lavatories, drinking fountains, mop sinks, a water heater, a wall hydrant, roof drains,
and floor drains.
2. This facility will be served by new municipal water and sewer service connections.
Authorization for construction in accordance with the approved plans may be withdrawn if construction is not
undertaken within a period of two years. The fact that the plans have been approved does not necessarily mean
that recommendations or requirements for change will not be made at some later time when cha~ged conditions,
additional information, or advanced knowledge make improvements necessary.
Village Commerce Building
Plumbing
Plan No. 075606
Page 3
September 27, 2006
~.. ro~ved:
VtttA!
.
Todd Schae e
Public Health Engineer
Plumbing Plan Review and Inspections Unit
443 Lafayette Road North
S1. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4343
651/284-5884
TDS:sas /
cc: Project Owner
Dakota Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Mr. Robert Hutchins, Building Official
File
1. White File
2. Pink City
3. YeUow Applicant
Date Rec'd
/ I. /3. 0"
ril--e wi 0(,.0874-
\ PERMIT NO. h, /087 \
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT,
TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE
AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT
(please
ADDRESS
Village Commerce Bldg. 47t9 Park Nicollet Ave SE Prior Lake Mn 55372
ZONING (office use)
~4-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only)
LOT
BLOCK
ADDmON
PID 2.6. 3CfI. OOZ.o
OWNER
(Name)
(Phone)
(Address)
BUILDER International Fire Protection 22275 Meadowbrook Ave N Scandia MN 55073
(Company NameLIntemational Fire Protection
(Phone)
(Contact Name) _Peter Vodenka 612-242-4676
(Phone)
(Address)
TYPE OF WORK g New Construction ODeck OPorch ORe-Roofing
OAddition OAlteration OUtility Connection
ORe-Siding
DLower Level Finish
o Fireplace
CODE: OI.R.C. OLB.C.
Type of Construction:
Occupancy Group:
F (fU"t S fit..( f-.( 1(.. La Il .s 7 s. 7 IlI1
o Misc:
A B
I
E
II
F
mIVVAB
HIM R S U
PROJECT COSTIVALUE $_38900.00
Division:
1 2 3 4 5
(excluding land)
I hereby certify that I have furnished information on this application which is to the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certify that I am the owner or authorized agent
for the above-mentioned property and that all construction wi\1 conform to all existing state and local laws and will proceed in accordance with submitted plans. I am aware that
the bUildin710. ffi .al can revoke this permit for just cause. Furthermore, I hereby agree that the city official or a designee may enter upon the property to perform needed
mspectlons.
X lfuIiN j/~k CO&lr- II/g/o,
Signature Contractor's License No. Date
Permit Valuation Park Support Fee # $
.00
Permit Fee $ '25" SAC # $
Plan Check Fee $ ~ ()V Water Meter Size 5/8"; 1";
State Surcharge $ . S'O Pressure Reducer
Penalty $ SewerfWater Connection Fee #
Plumbing Permit Fee $ Water Tower Fee #
~IPennit Fee $ rOrA '- $ 953.81
, tl \l \0 " Po. /2. 13. ~ {, lleee1ff.:d 5Z80 '" /f
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
HEATING/AIR CONDITIONING/FIREPLACE PERMIT
Date Rec'd
/ z z c (\0'
I. Pink File
2. (Jrccn City
3. Yellow Applicant
I-ILt::' {,v
PERMIT N
Rn;;"~.';;:~ tf~~
ZONING (office use)
(i A
'v/ <-]
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only)
LOT
BLOCK
ADDITION
PID -;"J!.,) 30/, 00 Z (
OWNER
(Name)
(Phone)
(Address)
~EW CONSTRUCTION o REPLACEMENT o AL TERA TIONS
FURNACE MAKE AND MODEL..1eL- fJ~ FUEL
FLUE SIZE RETURN OPENINGS INPUT OUTPUT
TYPE OF SYSTEM HEATING OR POWER PLANT
DWarm Air Plants PLEASE NOTE: Air Conditioner
o Steam Units and Fireplaces Cannot Encroach
~avity o Hot Water into Required Side Yard Setbacks.
echanical o Radiation
1]Air Conditioning o Special Devices Fireplaces with Box Additions or
DVent. System o Other Devices Cantilevers to the Outside of Buildings
Require a Building Permit.
FIREPLACE MAKE AND MODEL
APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE BELOW
Residential, Heating & AIC (New Construction)
Residential, Heating Only (New Construction)
FEE SCHEDULE
I % of job cost Residential, Gas Fireplace
$39.50 minimum
$99.50
$64.50
;V ()C:-
Estimated Cost $\J ,1 00(1. Building Permit #
)
$39.50
Industrial, Commercial & Multi-Family
Residential, Additions & Alterations
Residential, AC Only
$39.50
$39.50
l.
\ ..;- ,
1 lvl>- /l q
\. \ I .
, '
HEATING PERMIT FEE
STATE SURCHARGE
TOT AL PERMIT FEE
$
$
$
'0 00. '
.50
ZsOO.SO
./
....
j
Paid 000.50
Date 1.1 . 01
No. 51.. fbZ8
24 hour no Ice for all inspections (952) 447-9850, fax (952) 447-4245
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue, Prior Lake, MN 55372
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
HEATING/AIR CONDITIONING/FIREPLACE PERMIT
Date Rec'd
/2.. 2.8.()~
(,~~
~. ~;e:n ~:~ I PERMIT NO. /- IIZI
3. Yellow Appilcant , (t/ .
ZONING (office
use)
ADDRESS
171 7 P/J/l./G #/UJll6r riVe s~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only)
LOT
BLOCK
ADDITION
PID 25. 39/. (JOz.. ()
OWNER l {
(Name)-'Ve\AJ MClrke.J BcuLK- - 'PriorLaJ<.e.-- B(tU~ne)
(Address)
APPLICANT
(Name)
(Address)
VIERECK FIREPLACE SALES, INC.
16151 Main Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
952-440-5620
(Phone)
(Address)
(City)
(Zip Code)
DATE
APPLI i\NT PLEASE COMPLETE BELOW
EW CONSTRUCTION 0 REPLACEMENT 0 AL TERA TIONS
FURNACE MAKE AND MODEL FUEL
FLUE SIZE RETURN OPENINGS INPUT OUTPUT
(Phone) fJ I Z - t.P I {p -7 d-o- d-
/ :J.- -;J-f - 0 /.p
(Contact Person)
TYPE OF SYSTEM
OWann Air Plants
OGravity
o Mechanical
OAir Conditioning
DVent. System
HEATING OR POWER PLANT
o Steam
o Hot Water
o Radiation
o Special Devices
o Other Devices
PLEASE NOTE:
Air Conditioner Units
Cannot Encroach into
Required Side Yard
Setbacks
Residential, Heating & AlC (New Construction)
Residential, Heating Only (New Construction)
$39.50
FIREPLACE MAKE AND MODEL
Industrial, Commercial & Multi-Family
Residential, Additions & Alterations
Residential, AC Only
$39.50
$39.50
00
Estimated Cost $ J.:A 0 () -
HEATING PERMIT FEE
STATE SURCHARGE
TOT AL PERMIT FEE
Building Permit #
$ 31, 50
$
$
.50
JfIJ . () ()
(Office Use Only)
Date
Paid 4~. 00
Date/Z_ Z8. It,
This Application Becomes Your Building Permit When Approved
Recei No. 5 Z82/
Buildin!! Official
24 hour notice for all inspections (952) 447-9850, fax (952) 447-4245
"
.'
White - Building
Canary - Engineering
Pink - Planning
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST
NAME OF APPLICANT
APPLICATION RECEIVED
(;j/u;YS7TJ;vE COIJSn::-.
8.3 ore
The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit
application for construction activity which is proposed at:
4-7Zr ~rJl&/~ /i/lc---vLc6! I1V'6NU~
1/1 L L rl1 E (!.O /"1 /vl t:. / ~tf L LJ 9 .
Accepted With Corrections
Accepted
'-A
Denied
Reviewed By: a I?'. Date: qL~ 7 (0 (,
Comments: See Reverse Sid~ for Additional Information! .
j1s- f1v-..' ( -l s
re1 \J J _~c/
fr.'....l-
.-I--~
C e,. ~,'r,!c.-k oP-
CC~ ( (
<::) ~" ...., f~ -- <:..{
?~2.- <-f<-(7 - I&-~\.)
./l-
8,..---J
'^""' v s,--f. 10",--
((>,,-1,',.('cc..4
j' , I ~.J \ f I"
,J 1" . "1 I ....-"\ cl' -<- ~ · \,')"---
( ( ~,.... _-<-.oA <;.!) vi J.. f~ J o-{....
CJf 0 (' c .Jr~.-. ~.v
/
See Attachrhents: 1) Grading Plan, 2) Erosion Control M.easirres
"The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and
computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of
any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits
presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid."
~
White - Building
Canary - Engineering
Pink - Planning
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST
NAME OF APPLICANT G,a6,YS70AJE (!"Or./sT;e-.
APPLICATION RECEIVED 8. 3 0 Co
The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit
application for construction activity which is proposed at:
1--7Ze:; P/!~ N'/UJu...&/ A--VGNUb
1//(..,/;/'ICjI3 tlJMM~ .#t.-.oCj.
Accepted Accepted With Corrections v"
7)2-~
Comments: (. <Sc.lc.1It [1' l-+vAC, Pl..vA1&,;.J~, f-{f18/~ ~ f bt1~
(,..((;, rK!/Jfi? / G,c (r S ~ ANt) 5P4.lN/C.C,,yt. Pc.A-AJ > .
~
/<f)
.
Date:
Denied
Reviewed By:
'"),. se~'6-Il-~ p6lLAt '15 ~I"-I ~AfI...r H^,,>H-:
3. (,/'J5rAc--t- F.. I) . t..oc..,c:. l5t>y
4. l,v~~ -1 ," f/tb~ ~i>~ N~ t:1^I 8'-1/("
s-:. ~ .
5[fl$V 1.I,v(~>
"The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and
computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of
any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits
presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid."
White - Building
Canary - Engineering
Pink - Planning
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST
NAME OF APPLICANT
APPLICATION RECEIVED
i
I "l,
The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit
application for construction activity which is proposed at:
,. '-- /
Accepted
)<'!
Accepted With Corrections
Denied ---;}7 ~
Reviewed By: ~ ~ Dale: f -,,) 7- <?o
Comments:
RekrellzP U7b Loc -/i../O 9/
"The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and
computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of
any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits
presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid."
PRIOR LAKE
INSPECTION RECORD
DEPARTMENT OF
BUILDING AND INSPECTION
SITE ADDRESS -41t1 YA<2-lL N\GOL-L-~ Av~ 56-
NATURE OF WORK N~w VU....LAbC:. Cc",t't~ ~lL.-CI,.JG
USE OF BUILDING tic- r-J r::.vJ
PERMIT NO. 0 b - B? tf DATE ISSUED
CONTRACTOR ~<G~ ~r. Co PHONE~c;~.~b"'Z2'L7
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT FOR ANY OF THE INSPECTIONS BELOW
THE PERMIT IS BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT
FOOTING
FOUNDATION (Prior to Backfill) ~6
PLACE NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEE
ROUGH - INS
SEWER I WATER I SEPTIC
FRAMING 'g
INSULATION
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING u z." b1
HEATING (if required)
E..
GAS LINE AIR TEST I · ZS". D 7
COVER NO WORK UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED
I Sp~(t--l~~ ct' )H~ I PD I J/2.2..)67
Ph H,~ 'I,Jd? FINALS I I
GRADING (Prior to Sodding)
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING
HEATING
DO NOT HAS BEEN SIGNED
This card must be posted near an electrical service cabinet prior to rough-in inspections
and maintained until all inspections have been approved. On buildings and additions
where no service cabinet is available, card shall be placed near main entrance.
FOR ALL INSPECTIONS (952) 447-9850
,., ...,. """"""W: T r-. ~ "" ... TT"""
\JKnIkt.Ul"n
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
IIII
500 S. Marschall Road, Suite 300
Shakopee, MN 55379
Ph : (952)496-2227
IIII
Letter of Transmittal
I
To: Paul Baumgartner
City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota St. S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Ph: 440-9675 Fax: 440-9678
Subject: Village Commerce Documents
Transmittal #: 146
Date: 4/16/2007
Job: DB05-8950 Village Commerce Building
r Shop drawings
r Copy of letter
P' Attached
r Prints
r Change order
r Under separate cover via Mail the following items:
r
r
Plans
WE ARE SENDING YOU
Specifications
r Samples
rather
Document Type Copies Date No. Description
Other 1 2/23/07 ~~c~llnspec~~ Fina-'-~e2ort (Braul'l_~~~.~L- _ ---
------------- ---- f------ 1----------
Other 1 HV AC As-Built Drawings (Gopher Heating)
--..----.--.-.--.--- --_.---- ----- ----- 1----------- ----..-------.----
Other 1 ~umbing O&M ~~~al..!'~~uil!..~9 (~I(o~J-'1~~~n~~L
-.-----.-.------.-.-- 1----- --- ~,-_.._---
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
r For approval
P' For your use
P' As requested
r For review and comment
r FOR BIDS DUE
r Approved as submitted
r Approved as noted
r
r
r
Returned for corrections
r Resubmit _ copies for approval
r Submit _ copies for distribution
r
Return _ corrected prints
Other
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
Remarks:
Copy To:
From: Schmitz, Gordie (Greystone Construction Comp~
Signature:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
Page 1 of 1
A Special Inspection Final Report
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road and County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
Prepared for
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
Project BL-05-04456A
February 23, 2007
Braun Intertec Corporation
P~nr;0 C) 52 Cq.) :~IJOO
f:F )i)') )() 20
Braun Inlertec Corporation
11001 Hamoshire A.venue S
tv'iinneap.:)lls, t/'N 55438
'v\/~b brc.:unlnlerr~C.com
BRAUN
INTERTEC
February 23, 2007
Project BL-05-04456A
Mr. Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
500 South Marschall Road
Shakopee, MN 55379
Re: Special Inspection Final Report
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road and County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Schmitz:
Please find attached the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Village Commerce
Building and the final supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports for your review and records.
Special Inspections and Testing Procedures
The special inspection services provided for this project were provided by International Code Council
(ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the
International Building Code (IBC), the Special Inspection and Testing Schedule and the project plans and
specifications.
The purpose of the special inspection services is to provide a review of the work being performed by the
various contractors to determine if the work is being done according to the approved construction
documents. The special inspector doesn't have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of
special inspections to have them, judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural
engineer of record can do this.
As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize
the result of our inspections and testing. Copies of this report were provided to the site representative of
the contractor for his review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies
observed from the approved construction documents were noted.
Plans and Specifications
The approved plans and specifications were used for our inspections throughout the duration of the
project. From time to time, we have received plan modifications from the project structural engineer.
When received, these have been used to evaluate the work completed in the field.
. Celebrating 50 years of growth through service and trust
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
Project BL-05-04456A
February 23, 2007
Page 2
Soil Observations and Testing
The dynamic cone penetrometer (OCP) tests were done using a solid metal rod fitted with a 1 3/8-inch
diameter conical point. The point is driven into the soil with a lO-pound weight falling 24 inches. The
number of blows required to drive the point incrementally 6 inches into the ground is recorded. The blows
required driving the point each 6-inch increment is then used to correlate the soils relative density of
consistency with that determined from the soil borings and also used as a basis to estimate the suitability of
the soils to support the design loads. This test procedure was generally used when granular soils were
exposed in the bottom of the excavation.
The hand auger borings were drilled with a I 112-inch-diameter hand auger. The borings were advanced in
2- to 4-inch increments to depths of 1 to 3 feet below the bottom of the excavation. The shallower
penetrations occurred when the larger gravel cobbles and boulders were encountered. The auger was then
withdrawn from the borehole to obtain cuttings. The soils encountered in the borings were classified in
general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual/Manual
Procedures)." Preliminary estimates of soil consistency and density were also evaluated based on resistance
to penetration of the hand auger and the turning resistance.
Concrete Reinforcement
To conduct the required observations, the special inspector initially reviewed the reinforcement and
dowel requirements on the project structural and shop drawings. Information reviewed included bar size,
bar length, bar spacing, bar location, splice lengths and dowel placement. We also noted if the
reinforcement was free of rust, scale and soil prior to placement.
Concrete Compressive Strength Testing
The concrete cylinders cast were temporarily stored at the site and then returned to our laboratory for
moist curing and testing. The results of the concrete compressive strength testing have been were
forwarded to the interested parties under a separate cover as they became available.
Masonry Construction Observations
Prior to conducting the observations, the special inspector reviewed the construction documents and the
approved submittals. As construction began, the proportions of the site prepared mortar, construction of
mortar joints and the location of reinforcement and connectors was observed for compliance.
The inspection program included determining the size and location of structural elements in addition to the
type, size, and location of anchors, including other details of anchorage of masonry to structural members,
frames or other construction for compliance. We also determined if the specified size, grade and type of
reinforcement was used and if the protection of masonry was in compliance with the guidelines of Section
2104.3 and 2104.4 of the me.
Prior to grouting, the cleanliness of the grout space, placement of reinforcement and connectors, proportions
of site-prepared grout and construction of mortar joints were observed.
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
Project BL-05-04456A
February 23, 2007
Page 3
Concrete Masonry Prism Testing
The hollow core masonry prisms cast were tested in general accordance with ASTM C 13 14: Test Method
for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms. The samples were temporarily stored at the site and
returned to our laboratory for compressive strength testing. The results for the compressive strengths of
the masonry prisms were forwarded to the interested parties under separate cover as they became
available.
Concrete Masonry Grout Testing
The grout prisms cast were tested in general accordance with ASTM C 1019: Standard Test Method Jor
Sampling and Testing Grout. The samples were temporarily stored at the site and returned to our laboratory
for compressive strength testing. The results for the compressive strengths of the grout prisms were
forwarded to the interested parties under separate cover as they became available.
Visual Weld Examinations
Visual weld examinations were conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (A WS) D 1.1-
2004, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project specifications.
Bolting Observations
Bolting observations were conducted to determine if the boltholes were filled and if the splined end of the
tension control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct
indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap off load. At connections where the splined ends
were not, or could not be removed, the torque applied to the bolt by the contractor was determined using a
hand held torque wrench. In addition, each connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the
various plies were in contact with one another.
Deck Weld Observations
Deck weld observations were conducted in accordance with A WS 01.3-1998, Section 6.0 requirements
and the requirements of the project specifications. [n addition, the location and the completeness of the
side lap fasteners was also observed and evaluated.
[n areas where shear studs were placed over the supporting structural steel members, the size, spacing and
soundness of the stud welds were monitored. Soundness was determined by impacting each stud with a
six -pound maul. Sound studs "ring" if they are fully attached to the steel member, whereas unsound studs
"thud." Unsound studs were broken off and marked for replacement. The replacement studs were testing
in the same manner. Finally, selected sound studs were bent in accordance with the project requirements
to further evaluate their soundness.
General
Services performed by Braun lntertec personnel on this project have been conducted with that level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area. No
warranty, express or implied, is made.
Greystone Construction Company, lne.
Project BL-OS-04456A
February 23, 2007
Page 4
Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After
review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional
information, please call Bob Anderson at 952.469.3644 or Ron Shaffer at 952.995.2234.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORA nON
Robert D. Anderson, EIT
Senior Engineering Assistant
/pc~/!{?_xLhtX~
Ronald A. Shaffer, PE
Associate - Senior Engineer
Attachment:
October 2006 Observations Report
Field Compaction Tests Reports 1 through 3
Proctor Curves 1 through 2
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders I through 12
Standard Method of Sampling and Testing Grout Report
Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units Report
Constructing and Testing Masonry Prisms (ungrouted) Report
c: Robert Dana Hutchins; City of Prior Lake
Rpt-spec inspect
.
Braun Inlertec Corporation
1 ) I}) 1 h.JrPO::ir.I;e '::"',,~nIJe S
f'/'lnne~J~Y)I,5 I\,'N 55433
PhDne 952 (1952000
hx 9529952020
\Neb brauninterteccom
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Special Inspection Final Report
City of:
Prior Lake
Date: February 23, 2007
Attention: Robert Dana Hutchins
Project:
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road and County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
[n accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of
services, special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items:
Soils. The required testing in the field and laboratory has been completed. The compaction testing done
during the fill placement indicated the procedures used by the grading contractor were generally adequate
to compact the fill and backfill to meet the project requirements. Any areas that did not meet density
requirements were recompacted and retested. The retests indicated the areas in question met density
requirements. Observations and testing of the footing excavation bottom indicated the soils were
consistent with those encountered in the soil boring and suitable for support of the design loads. There
are no outstanding discrepancies and there are no unresolved soils issues.
Concrete. The required testing in the laboratory has been completed. The available results have been
forwarded under separate cover. The compressive strength testing indicates the concrete placed has met
the project requirements. No discrepancies were noted and there are no outstanding issues.
Reinforcing Steel. The reinforcement placement detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports was
observed according to the requirements of the project plans and specifications. No discrepancies were
noted and there are no outstanding issues.
Structural Masonry Construction. The required structural masonry observations and testing have been
completed with any discrepancies documented and discussed with the contractor. Following the required
corrections, the structural masonry construction was found acceptable. There are currently no
discrepancies and no unresolved structural masonry related issues.
Structural Welding. The welded connections detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports were
observed according to the requirements of the project specifications. Discrepancies were noted and
documented. Following the required corrections, the connections were found to be acceptable. There are
currently no outstanding or unresolved structural-steel-related issues.
The shear studs detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed and tested based on the
requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and the contractor made
the required repairs. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved shear stud-related issues.
The deck welding and side-lap fasteners detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed
and found to be acceptable. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking related issues.
Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed
according to the project plans and specifications. Corrections were made as required. No discrepancies
were noted after the corrections and there are no outstanding issues.
Various reports have been issued that discuss the results of the concrete compressive strength testing.
These should be reviewed along with this final special inspection report.
. Celebrating 50 years of gTOwth through service and trust
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
Project BL-05-04456A
February 23, 2007
Page 2
Conclusion
Based upon the inspections performed and our Special Inspection Daily Reports, it is our professional
judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in
accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural engineer provided modifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code.
Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation
Professional Certification
I hereby certifY that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct SUWt'iYlt.9n and that I
am a duly Licensed professional,~~'~~19..e laws
of the State of Minnesota. ~~o...., ......~~
... . . -:?...
~ . ~ . ...;' LICENSED ". ~
c....-r~ahe(~. ~La~~Or:ESSlor~AL: =
R Id A Sh cc ~P:E~ -rl ::.:: I ENGiNEEH : =
ona . aller, _ U'l . . -
Associate - Senior Engineer S ~"" 12115 ....,,~ g
License Number: 12115 ~//~:'~F'Mi~~~~~''''
February 23, 2007 11111/ 11\\\\\
Attachments:
Special Inspection Daily Reports (Soils, Rebar, and Masonry) I through 10
Special Inspection Daily Reports (Structural Steel) I through 4
BRAUN
INTERTEC
lkaun Intertec Corporation
j J 1_10 1 Hump)hlfB .:"'"eoue S
f,tn02Qp,j,; MN 55433
Pnone Q 5 2 QO 5 F)Ot)
Fo, 052 QQS 7020
\I'/eb hrounmfelle(~ corn
October 5, 2006
Project BL-05-04456A
Mr. Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
500 South Marschall Road, Suite 300
Shakopee, ~ 55379
Re: Test Pit Observations
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road and County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Schmitz:
On September 9th, we arrived at your Commerce Building site to observe test pits that were made for
further documentation of the existing soil conditions. Mr. Ken Bryant, your project superintendent,
requested these observations to assist in determining the extent of exca vation required to prepare the
building and paving areas.
Test Pit Observations
We observed seven test pits. Most of them were excavated in the building area; three along the west
building line. We observed approximately 2 feet to 5 feet of fill underlain by a layer of clayey sand, then
native sand was present to termination depths of the test pits.
Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the 2 feet to 5 feet of fill should be stripped from the
building areas to the elevations of the clayey sand and native sand. The resulting surface should then be
compacted with at least six passes with a large self-propelled vibrating compactor. Fill can then be placed
to reach desired grades. A portion of the existing fill can be reused as unew" filL The topsoils should not
be reused and wet clay fill should not be reused. As indicated in the soils report, the fill should be placed
in uniform layers, less than I foot thick, and compacted with a large self-propelled vibrating compactor.
Fill should be compacted to a minimum of95 percent standard Proctor density (ASTM [) 698) under
floor-slab areas and 98 percent standard Proctor density under footing and coluum pad areas.
In our judgment, the native clean sands we observed at foundation level would be suitable for the planned
3,000 pounds per square foot (pst) bearing pressure. However, it is necessary that we confirm this when
the footing trenches are prepared. Mr. Bryant will contact us when he is ready for us to view these
excavations.
Site Paving
We understand from Mr. Bryant that two pavement sections are under consideration. The preferred
section is 3 inches bituminous over 6 inches aggregate base, and the alternate section is 3 1/2 inches
bituminous over 8 inches of aggregate base. It is planned to prepare the subgrade soils, place the
aggregate base and the bituminous base course. The surface (wear) course of bituminous would follow
in the spring.
. Provldmg ellgl1leenllg and ,cIlL'!nmmencal solutions sinCe 1957
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
Project BL-05-04456A
October 5,2006
Page 2
If the subgrade soils can be dried and compacted, and if the pavement only receives light usage through
the winter, then the preferred sections would be suitable with some ordinary patching. However, in our
opinion, expecting a dry subgrade and light usage during construction is not realistic. We estimate that
at least half of the bituminous base could be lost due to heavy construction loads. Hence, we reconunend
selecting the alternate pavement section and placing 2 inches of bituminous base followed by I l/2 inches
of surfacing next spring. Even with this appreciably thicker section, some repair will be necessary before
surfacing next spring.
Exterior Flatwork
Some soils-primarily the clayey sand and any lean clay soils-are frost-active materials; particularly
when they contain even a trace of organic matter. We reconunend that the entrance slab to the building
be supported upon a layer of clean sand that extends down to the clean sands. Otherwise, the entrance
slab should be supported on a frost footing. Placement of the entrance stab on the existing soils entails a
risk of slab heave during cold weather.
General
In performing its services, Braun lntertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality.
No warranty, express or implied, is made.
If you need additional information regarding our observations recommendations, please contact Ron
Shaffer at 952.995.2234.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
JQ~~
Engineer In Training
Professional Certification
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
~~
Ronald A. Sh~ffer, PE
Senior Engineer/Associate
Ltr-Village COl11lllcrce B1dg
City of ~: 'OJ lOJ~
5 ~ 0.\ sJ..eo l "..2. Date of This Report:
V \ \\o.~Q (()WWW itA.. ~: \6.') Project No.:
~ ~7 <;J-o~
51. ) V"\. '^'7
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Report No.:
Projecl Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Client Project No.:
Temperoture:
\
Page ~ of
SIDRPT
Special Inspection Daily Report
12- 7--0\,.-,
(5l - 0"')- . 0'1- ,-s/" A
8~
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~ Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
2 Welding & Bolting
o Piles & Piers
o Rebar Placement
o Concrete Placement
o Tendon Placement
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
o Soils
o Special Cases
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
DeS(;)iOn and location of work completed:
, ~O r Jb{~1-
~'--ci~
<A-- t-- R O~
~U J~~~,^ty
CD
L~~\
^\'lfeJ
M()W'QV\..\--
I~\.
~ \,
A ~J-- 5" Ytr
G~: c
6)
~
p .
~~\l\
?'\ \ \Q. \-
A-t)
1-/0, L-
r. .
r- '- \.~-t-
l o/~ ~
\.0Q lot ~
t'\.Jo
~ht
---
re.\A\4),^
""
~. .~&t3 P,",I~II'I(..J.
6y{.~
--
O-..+- G;: ~ ~s ( 1<..~sP-
<!~~Yeu>a v..'1 ~~
f3~ It-os c>-- -\- l- ~{O~-
4- "0
(~! O~L-- l\J~
d t!) tre pa.."'-y r11JW
· Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
· Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
. If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Yes 0
Yes 0
No
No
[
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBe, except as noted above.
Signed: ~
Print full Name: j) OM.\.O ( a brv1...~
Date:
1.0. No.:
(2.-") -0!v,
1~{t[o<7v~
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Pro;ect Site Representative.
.
Providing engineering arul environmental solutions since 1957
Page _ of
BRAUN
INTERTEC
SIDRPT
Special Inspection Daily Report
':-J '
City of \- f- ,: () r l..cd<><,___
"S+ee{~
Project Name: VI {(a.~..,- (~~€\(-<-
Project Address: Y t ~ 0 r\~ \<: -r (p... j.J
Client:
Report No.:
Date of This Report: 1;2 -t5 -Ou,
5L-o-5- 04451..9-A
Project No,:
7?r
I .'-
Client Project No.:
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
,0 Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
~ Welding & Bolting
o Piles & Piers
Temperoture: :SS6F
0 Rebar Placement 0 Foundations o Special Cases
0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
0 Tendon Placement 0 Soils
Weather:
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (listed Below)
No 0
List tesls performed:
· Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
· Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
. If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Yes 0
Yes 0
No~
No~
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specificalions and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBe, except as noted above.
Signed '%U"Y>f\.
PrinIFoII Name, ~(or~r1~1'\
Date:
L2 -/5-01...0
5:l~R<.tJB:Z- 85
to. No.:
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
.
Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Page ~ of ---t-
SIDRPT
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Special Inspection Daily Report
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
City of f..r\ () v Lv...~
S tv-\A.crl\..V'tA \ <; ~ ( .sty Date of This Report:
V~ \\u.~ (\;)VV\~.17 Project No.:
( z..-\q -v b
BLA \) ~~ 0\.1 ~ ,,(~A
6~ c:;~
<; \"N\,V' 7
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
'1-\:)4;:--
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~ Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
~Welding & Bolting
o Piles & Piers
o Rebar Placement
o Concrete Placement
o Tendon Placement
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
o Soils
o Special Cases
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (listed Below)
No 0
2...vJ. Floc>-/
<d,- ~ c-\I'€~J
Co", ~ \ 60 l rs
~l ~
Gr.'d
"6~
A-iJ
CiJ
9r ~ ,- I o~ \
A ~J..~ o/y'\
A-D
I - I o. t
G...: ~
<::t '-~ ~~ ~
Y\~~
list tests performed:
. Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
. Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
. If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Yes 0
Yes 0
NO~
No c:
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/USC, except as noted above.
Signed:
~
~ i>...-l9 r. ~tL '--
Date:
( ~4.q. ~v\,...
Ct;) ~'7(o9~-8b
Print Full Name:
1.0. No.:
White copy to Braun Interlec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
.
Providing engineering and ent'iromnerual solutions since /957
BRAUN~
INTERTEC
Special Inspector Daily Report
/-7 LA-
--';C; A . ~
City of /-/;1Z/o~ ~...-
,
Page
! of /
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
01
C?o/77/71.,e::;--~F- ;3l_ry:-.
Date of This Report: /0 I L /00
8 l. f
Project No.: - ~'5 - Olt45~^
~70~
/. .' / ucic-
'-"
Client Project No.:
Temperature: ~0
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry ~bar Placement [J/Foundation~ ~/L-S.
o Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Description and location of work comPletedO~/V~..d d"C/J.J<;;' ~r') ~ j (SH)
i-ods j/1/1fA'1'J. :Jj;cJ.J ",j 4A tf:J.v ~ Sty"jlJY'l/
(3 h7A/1v'"\ do~ ~ f)~d6 OJ..Prla. ~ k- S; OL4'-.'/Yj dJ.-(/ vJa/ I , /1(C;
U . / '
() hYYJ/:C::Z; r. Ju I(
/1 -f;::,.--
~~ IP ~
~. ~r~~~
a~ dJA-
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~Periodic
~ liu :
&/~
",
List tests performed:
), .L
c-O-'?S,.,~ ~ r
./es I- .p)f /_~
Y'Z' J.,."P...fi "
I
OrJ<~t/"-
rev, 0 '1~;
.
Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
/'~
No [g-
No~
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and
applicable woe ship provisions of Ibe IBClUBC, excePt~' noted above. . /; "0 .~
Signe' &/ LAJl'/..-J---__ Date: 10 2-/
E~' (r'
Print Full Name: . ,_ j,t::t e.- .- LD. Number:
A./,A/
(White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
/?~//S-"
Or? 'Jr z.:"1' /YI;;- (..--
'''"') ....,.,...#,
,-j
frm\specinsp.4 If25/95
Page_ of_
BRAUN
INTERTEC
DfNTSTEST
Rev 3/04
Daily Field Notes
Project No.: fL -0; - 04l.f56 A
Location: \h~ /(e. p CD h,f""'~ rL-e
10...0. -0'
~.
Weather Conditions: . ~
+t~
rJ6r-- L.,~ f
Report No.:
3
Date:
Arrived On Site At:
Personnel
Classification
Arrive
Depart
\
,
\
Starting Test No.:
Ending Test No.:
s
Proctor Information:
Submitted To:
Performed By:
~
Concrete Testing
Date Cast:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Supplier:
Spec. Strength:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
Set:
Set:
Submitted To:
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
. Prooiding engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUNSU
INTERTEC
Special Inspector Daily Report
pn(;r La ~
Page
of
City of
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
it" f2tk.r
J0Jrj{( ~we F'7--rt
({tAWII' ~.f vY',o fb~
6{~y~c~/
61LJ
Date of This Report: I 0 ~ 'i - 0 ,
Project NO..; BL- (/ ~-04~ S~ A
N;(~..((ti AVf
Client Project No.:
Temperature: (Aft!) b-,,(/ 'fOJ
ri Rebar Placement 0 Foundations
/0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Tendon Placement 0 Other
lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Description and location of work completed; J ,,~~.JI u nJ o~J t?,\>o.r 'f Iw:b~ -t
fOI f~,~-b:,r -E'o~-+I~S C/--r:.f fCA>rf:r.i ~ ~(.;~ (3 <j{(JL~ (+~ l~
A +b A1.& 4~ A~b -I-&>{~ - 7'5-f-L 10 r.,J f/bf<;. 3..;- 2/ ~jLj)'J~
GJ +/ t3/ ~(.
G=-~.. ~6--- .::r rZ.)~.:) c~+ X- \2-I( ~ -7 L/'~~ ~S- c-t..J/5 ~ t:;'-O"o,C
(f3'> - 3'-0")( 3'-Cf' X\?-" \-./( (3)-{;..;:.- S..VJ.
~ ,
) I' I, fl
cr-~) - 4 \-C/'K L1'-O X \ (. L-vj (4) ~~ (v
(f.G'> - S/-o"x.SLu"x [1.(, L/ C!;)-~S- (woO
I
({1) - ZO"-K ZO"X(~)~h v~J L-...-{ ~.-S+{~ (3 I z,l. O. C.
I
A" ~bv-- pke.J ~t.5 ~0vd6~~.J ~4: b2)
~,-
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~ Periodic
Inspection C.overage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o Boltin
List tests performed:
>~~*V1/I.
.
Are there any' discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
No~
N{)~
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted fhove.
Signed: $~\C~ bate: \'1:S1-
Print Full Name: 6b AI\c..f2z rs ~ 1.0. Numher: \ r-=::>-c::Yt-- C)S
(While copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Cnn/racwr.)
frm\Sfl':';'nsp.4 1/25/95
BRAU N'w
INTERTEC
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Special Inspector Daily Report
City of -Pr/t-r ~~
$ -:r :5 l. 'j'->
\r( \\1~t' (c yr"(""r)
f(-4-Vl ., (~l f2<.., \ C^-
C:t ~'f<:+~~
( /lUu~
Page
of
BW6-project No.:
\1;~ Ni(O~+
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
Date of This Report: \ 0 - ~ -O-b
~ - 0-"'- oYC-[, ~'"1S A
Ave-
L-u \..v 0{ 6 'J
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry Rebar Placement % Foundations
o Welding Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Boltin Tendon Placement 0 Other
Did the architect or en ineer authorize chan es to cit a roved lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Descriptionandloca~ionofworkcompleted: ~f-=J c.~ f>4t8('~ ~~I~
~"o""," ;I,~3 0" f,;",-t1j 50 ~n..1L 5,?; Is. -(;,:- ~v --f1.5~ 0-...)
~<2.~ 0"vI 0 ~ LJF . \"i-e_ s ~c=& 5,(,; k ~ .S -+-. c.r("5 'I S-f'--S ",>;)
k'o. r \7' ~ ~ .A 5.o....-,.Y 6 J -t'o..r-Iy 5~..J <;0 u-J ILl ~,( +4.-I-!.>
'brcA.v'- I~ CD lor J ~,v~ c.k./lS-F/ ~ u-JI,f/VV) 'N~J QL1fj6r
(h>b6 s. y>Je ~16-C{Y'-",Y:b c,,..., G. ~X,'-*<" c~ f "-3 / +~
G~cU:: -8r Qr,>/ \ oo.5.-6-6I-Jor {~L-;tC{~te $b:\S. \Le(~
~(~ rv , o<lS6 ""(' L>'"\'!.v:t""b ~ s" tis 6.'vwJ. lIt; ~~
~__'I\( cJ?;: j~ce k-. ~ sl\(~C(1k {/ \(J~4.l""f 0 (.c.,",(<€fe
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~ Periodic
List tests performed:
. Are there any' discrepancies noted from this day's observations? y~ 0
. Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
· If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and
applicable worlcmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above.
Signed: -q;A~
Print Full Name: ~ A~ {~
Date: ~Q-OI-Ob
\ ~ S:r
LD. Number:
(White copy 10 Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
fnn\SfI"clRsp.4 1125/95
BRAUN'W
INTERTEC
Special Inspector Daily Report
City of ?r,if k~-
Page
of f
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
--!J. 8 ~ Date of This Report: IO-cP(---Ob
"-..r',\ \ ~r r::cY'--~(ce: ~G-Project No.: pL-05>--OLfLfS""t;,A
-'E~~-(j<r--- l~:\ ~ C0< f{c<:D\{e+ A"-/E
c..j.r~'j<;~~ ~ Client Project No.:
C /
l<AHS Temperature:
f~
. I
\....P<)~ b~
~ Rebar Placement 0 Foundations
o Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Tendon Placement 0 Other
lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Description and location of work completed: q-E---B.{~e.-cP R h..r- (~Sf("'< -t1~"'.5 o~
~ -CJ'-3> J -{ r6, <;~ .,.- ---c \d l-~ f ~;+, ::') ~,,( <p 4"- ___-t +4> <.c.v.---<.
l <>(pv{.'<:'" (",-,- f2 0 L~ 1) plAIE-J ~ ~/if> 0 G (( J \ I>{), A - 7./ J
A - 8. tt c--cY A, 2 - cr. z ccJ A. b '-r.~.
F'/& f>J(U) - b'-Of,.-I(bLOf;X (6" v-/ (7)~ t.,U
Q C ~=t) - '7~o'/X 7'-'0'; X IB~ ~ b) ~( r:-~
-"
(~n1.5 C~6>V~ F(6) -- ZC1 ''xl 2,' · ~ CQ~
... J c.rBux\Z-" w/(<{) ~> C-~{ ~/~~;. ~)-GL(81(c>.C..
I I
frif.s(?t) -:r 7d'x201J G/(q) nib 'v(<'ts ,--I JJ. s+{~~ e-/~(IO,-C~
/ - /-
Listtests performed AI ( a br plf!(( J lnP-eb t€tQ,~ N>,,[r x{, be:! --fk
-s--+oo<-f\JIf-L( fU~rS..
Type of Inspection:
~ Continuous
AG Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o Boltin
/;
J J #~ eJ Y8t7~(
.
Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes D
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Nc~
N5#
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work: inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBc, except as noted above.
Signed: ~ ~):6f5-- Date:
g~b A,,& e.tJ~
Print Full Name:
/0-01-0("
LD_ Number: I '7sr
(White copy to Braun Intertec file, Blue copy to General Con/raaar.)
frn\\sp.:"insp.4 1/25/95
BRAUN'W
INTERTEC
Special Inspector Daily Report
City of .ph ~r lQ V\e..
Date of This Report: 10 -o( -0 6
~... 6$-6-11-\.>-' A
Page
of
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Client Project No.:
Temperature: Lc "'"' 7 O\~
;e(' Rebar Placement 0 Foundations
,/ IT Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Tendon Placement 0 Other
lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Descripi'wn and location of work completed: -r (f--( r r-€ J-- \' l'1~ f?.('-c--t: ~",",3 c",-oe::) 0 \os.("/';.jt;-~j)
-\ cC j."1 ~ ..' r tu::f ;, '- &(' r~ l1 c....~J S-
.--.../ '
6""0{ 13'-z) ::~/; y) S.J c;.J (~A- ':f G~ e(;l'vf~Y c,-.r-(L{1eeJ{: (S.
c- ~ J II D,-., ~ s":'".J elevct.1-&- I Sf/Ai {L.,-- (/ Fr 6-- .
.3 ~G)'~ ./0.. '-at'A 61 _OIl )< \ 6/1' L-/j (1) 4t~ -r ~
ICii-) -=r7'-Q'IX71-dx )'6" ~L((,j1'f6 ~,'vV,
- I I
r\ - \ . c/ ( >( L 0 ) 11 '2 [5 fi-
3 ~( 2c:/')( (.0'/ {.. erfi>
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o Boltin
-\t ~ ~(v.
1O~
List tests performed: ;d II (t-k~ f If/. uJ J-...-e.'D
5+uc ~./&:t I ()141 <-
q
(€l'U/{E;"_~fs ~{, ~
(
.
Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's ohscrvations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes D
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
/"
NIl ~
N(l~
/ '
. .
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted ahove.
SignOO:::;it'b ~Q.
Print Full Name: ~~b ArSl ($.-.t---~
Date:
to-Ob-ex;:
LD. Numher: ~n~
(White copy to Braun [ntertee file, Blue copy to General ContraClnr.)
lnn\l;p.o~insp. 4 1125/95
BRAU N'w
INTERTEC
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~ Periodic
Special Inspector Daily Report Page of
City of f1'(~r k L4:--
~\x-y- * zj Date of This Report: ~ 10-05"'- e>L
:vJJ:~ ~~~'j ~t{ 3 '7"iect No. ., .fL-c>S - C7-(</ /;f.,;'"
~L--'::'- __ ~ \ A_ _crK f\( I( 0 II v -(- /tv k:
61~\./<,+.I>--v Client Project No.:
5 \.l~~ Temperature:)V d 0--5.
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o Boltin
k' Rebar Placement 0 Foundations
o Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Tendon Placement 0 Other
lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
/-\-,,-p
...,) \:) >{'{ .. e c/
.07 f~"" c
( ?- v:' ,.....I!..<../
.... ~ "f' <:
~ C' .) r t~ .('0 't \,,:" ~ .'"
-('c' ~, .
,
G\...r""--Q..c<r
Description and location of work completed:
(~ \0,(-- P \<:.tcr ~rf
D- L-1.J ':; / c' ,'C ( :.
L\: C-P- 0 -r (f{S ->
\~\I OJ::.
A)l t( ~( f ~-tL-V~
~ -r- 5('j~ \:."t-
{,;y'u (~U,'L' C~~C Ccr<.(F f~
l\
iJ / r
(L..- V L- {.c/ .
10'l/( L0" L-v/ (<{) :tt ,
I
f.er~
~/ ~3-+r~.>
/
v~f<;
f>
~.r
,;;-*<[..,.:fI...I2< f f \[,,-,J ,
{€ty !'<'E ~A-5
56 b~
List tests performed:
.
Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's ohservations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
NI,zP
No ,
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted ahove.
Sign~ ~{S-
Print Full Name: jS~ A",ar54^-..
Date: 10- r;;-Ob
I + (>:2
1.0, Numher: ....:> r
(While copy to Braun Interlec file, BLue copy [(] General Contractor,)
frm\sp""lRsp.4 1125/95
Pagel of V
BRAUN
INTERTEC
DFNTSTEST
Rev 3/04
Daily Field Notes
Project No.: lSL-65- O\...f ~ 50 A Client:
""\L _ . (/ 'I t...
Location: VI ~ .' C "y"',.....~rC"~ PI./ \d,-:)
Dote: \ D -0 -Dc;.,
Weather Conditions: e S_/''''\~ Lc,-< (,Dj
(~Q::gi,o-~ "
\ (, c:..r 1 >.0.' }4
Report No.:
z,.
Anived On Site At:
Personnel
Arrive
Depart
Compadion Testing
No. of Tests: I
Starting Test No.: -3 ((; ~~ \
..eOj
Proctor Information: \ - L-.
Submitted To:
Ending Test No.:
Performed By:
~S>~
Concrete Testing
Date Cast:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Spec. Strength:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Supplier:
Mix:
Air:
Temperature:
Temperature:
Temperature:
Temperature:
Temperature:
Mix:
Air:
Mix:
Air:
Air:
Air:
Mix:
Mix:
L+O~ - cJl G+... (0. ~-L &,,---1
A ~'-' ~. ( + ) 4'> ~(~Jt (>totf5
~~+p/.'2-
,4-'2>.... / j;- \.J
t
(. - i \....:..e 55
p+oC <h.J ) -t~ l.5' -#1
C - ~ J>..2.--~ ~3~
Submitted To:
Performed By: ~~l~-n
White copy to Braun 'ntertec fi'e. B'ue copy to Proied Site Representative.
. ProWling engineering and erwirarunental solutions since 1957
Page 2 afG-
- -
BRAUN
INTERTEC
DFNTSTEST
Rev 3/04
Daily Field Notes
Project No.: ~ ~t;' -L)Y ""' <:;;(; A
location: \J1' \ctp (' <..Y"rii--e(C R'
Dote: _lh-l{ - (:) b
p? c , !
Weather Conditions: ...... . ..>v/\~ (.....C..,I-'C~i..5.
G t~d~.r.e .
('(Gr' ~v<;>_
Report No.: 2/
Personnel
Classification
Arrive
Depart
Compadion Testing
No. of Tests:
Starting Test No.:
Proctor Information:
Ending Test No.:
Submitted To:
Performed By:
Concrete Testing
Dote Cost:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Supplier:
Mix:
Air:
Spec. Strength:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
T emperoture:
Temperature:
T emperoture:
T emperoture:
T emperoture:
Mix:
Air:
Mix:
Air:
Air:
Air:
Mix:
Mix:
Comments:
e
'-
dilS ~ c-w~ 15
I
U;'l..
Submitted To:
:?, A ().
Performed By~ 1'~.'.lc...u.l",,---___
White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
. PrOlliding engineering and environmentL1l solutions since 1957
..
. .
.
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test Report
Job Number ~ -6 D'-I4 ~ b"Aob Name "C" \ lc..-J"" en >->--tIC '"
Client b<e:\../g-~ Tech f<~ Date JC>~ ~-c)(,
/
Penetrometer Dimensions: 1 3116-inch diameter tip, 10- pound hammer, 24-inch fall
Location Sketch:
-f
rfL--
j
i
j y.A-t-tf )t\.vtt
i
I
5~~~ >-e.,ls 5At\j ~
---
Test Results:
Test Number \
Surface Elevation F'\ 6-- 5 ~~17 90(,( l> II
~~ '-..J *
Blows, 0-6"
Blows, 6-12" '-1\
Blows. 12-18" 32-
Blows, 18-24" c6
Blows, 24-30" ?/+
Blows, 30-36"
Blows, 36-42"
Blows, 42-48"
Blows, 48-54"
Blows, 54.60"
Blows, 60-66"
Blows, 66-72"
Blows, 72-78"
f. r: t:::: I~l
BRAUN'W
INTERTEC
Special Inspector Daily Report
City of Pr.Gv tk-c-
Page
l of
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Date of This Report:
Project No.:
III W/iJY
fSL--DD' tJIIf5{pA
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
7'S-O
Did the architect or en
Inspection Coverage:
~ Masonry
10- Welding
o Boltin
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~ Periodic
Description and location of work completed:
A- B o~ b)j(
O~~~
J2 p ~ b.-^,LJ A
o
o
Tendon Placement 0 Other
lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No
I- /11.,~"".\, W~/15 e Gxj;
I ,
#' S ~ l.M v 'I 0,( f e ~~-; J~s...:~\
I:v'-<p/ l~A;4..--1 C -r:;..') ;1 w#" If 6vov-f /3&.~L'/
. I
/4_ -{ ; /0.
L-<- '." 5 v'-' ~ 7""'/1 0,-/
I
Rebar Placement
Concrete Placement
Foundations
Fireproofing
{
-3
~llA-Itrll~-4r
! / "
1jiX---~
''''
List tests performed: L 45.-1- . &0"""'-+ R:sVV\. S
S/fA MAp -:; 9 II
Te~~ =-75'~
I
. Are there any' discrepancies noted from this day's ooservations? Yes 0
. Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
· If yes. see attached Summary Sheet.
No ~
NoR.'!
To the best of our knowledge. work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted aoove.
Date:
JI,1~
I.D. Numoer:
(White copy to Braun lntenec file. Blue copy to General CnntraClnr.)
fnn\sp,:c'RSp.4 1125/95
BRAUNSW
INTERTEC
Special Inspector Daily Report
K-IUy ~t<0
Page
(
of (
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Date of This Report:
Project No.:
C b f.
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
?#
.-->0
Did the architect or en
o
o
Tendon Placement 0 Other
Yes 0 (Listed Below) No
t?4..-J f!1-.';Y ~ R__I;-r f!:- &1& -2.:<>::)
~Re&rvY ~f C, ,; {'jVVl~~ ~ "-~ b r1
L (' I \
E.W'- t D\ 1- I~
~,~~'7 #5 (hv+ O,L.
~lA1, &'~W4-
Inspection Coverage:
~ Masonry
o Welding
o Boltin
Rebar Placement
Concrete Placement
Foundations
Fireproofing
Type of Inspection:
(J Continuous
~ Periodic
Description and location of work completed:
..
,f
'f
bo.ccC fk~1
D-..A~-
Z =IF- 5
List tests performed:
.
Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's ohservations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached SUOla'1lary SheeL
No tbi
N(l~
.
.
To the best of our knowledge. work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicab anship provisi e USe. except as noted ahove,
[. 0~55
If !~!o(P
/ /
I.D. Numher:
Date:
(White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy [0 General Cnnlractnr.)
"nn\sp,,~insp.4 1125/95
Page~ of~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
SIDRPT
Special Inspection Daily Report
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
City of
)fV.u..dwo... <. c;kt,\ ~ (
U'\\ G
<.17
G~ ~k>V'lL
'v'^""")
[>"'\"0, LW<R
Date of This Report:
{/-~O.UI.o
8L-o~ - dt'\(~A
"S.E'..-
Client Project No.:
Temperoture:
(oOF
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~ Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
4:ti. Welding & Bolting
o Piles & Piers
o Rebar Placement
o Concrete Placement
o Tendon Placement
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
o Soils
o Special Cases
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below)
No 0
Q
rycription and location of work completed:
~J --"Jb\<;r- ft l~t ~ \.~S
I-\\).?-- #,\0 c!~"~~""J
Betk'-'^. t: 14.t;..~ [) (' \.\.{Q ~
a wi G~f F\.l\J1 -
aJ- l,tr~ f::"luu/
-~\<ci
~ \ ct~
I ~/S~ ~/S'q
)
C r-~' ~
A-):)
G,,:~~
.,4....1) ?,.. 5''''' lo~ 7-
f-.j0 ~t."'V'I. tA t~ ~
List tests performed:
. Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 No gJ L 5 E kj\.'-lee.r-.}
· Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No q ~O s. ~d.'\.... ~ to ,
· If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. L e (ue v..v 1M. y.J ~1:,o
Sl)")...o~<" -bl-<< ~
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications ana appllcablEt
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. MV-- ~<U\ ~oJ~
Signed:
~'
[j()..)A..& ~ r~r-~~
Date:
,.J
LD. No.:
Ir- ~o-;:)b
I~~rl{.o' )~%b
Print Full Nome:
White copy to Broun Interlec file. Blue copy to Proiect Site Representative.
.
Pr01iiding engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Standard Method of Sampling and Testing Grout (Field)
ASTM CI019
Date:
December 7, 2006
I
11/812006
Not given
9
Grid (A-B) and (1-2)
25' up wall
Ultimate Load (Ibs.):
Compressive Strength (psi):
Type of Failure:
Avg. 28 Day Compressive Strength (psi):
28 Day Specified Strength (psi):
IA
3.50
3.54
6.54
< 5.()()%
12.39
1lI1O/2006
121612006
2
26
28
68,760
5550
Shear
lB
3.56
3.54
6.46
< 5.00%
12.60
1lI1O/2006
1216/2006
2
26
28
70,140
5570
Shear
Remarks The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
.
Oient:
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
Gordie Schmitz
500 S. Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee, MN 55379
Field Data
Set Number:
Cast Date:
Mix Design:
Slump (in.):
Location:
Sample Data
Sample Number:
Average Width I (in.):
Average Width 2 (in.)
Average Height (in.):
Out of Plumb (%):
Area (sq. in.):
Laboratory Data
Date Received:
Date Tested:
Field Cure (days):
Lab Cure (days):
Test Age (days):
Test Results
cc:
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
IC
3.53
3.51
6.62
< 5.00%
12.39
11110/2006
1216/2006
2
26
28
66,200
5340
Shear
5,490
3,000
Phone: 952.4693644
Fax 9524698599
Web brouninlertec.com
Project Number:
BL-05-04456A
Project Description:
Village Conunerce Building
Prior Lake, MN
Masonry Units
-Type:
- No. Used:
Field Cure Temperature
- Maximum eF):
- Minimum eF):
Not given
Not given
Not given
Not given
Reviewed By:
fJf:~)
Project Manager
· Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
.
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units
ASTM C140 (Section 9.4, Net Area Detenniuation)
Specifications per ASTM C90
Date:
December- 5,2006
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S. Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee, MN 55379
Sample Data
Set Number:
Number- of Samples:
Type of Unit:
Supplier & Plant:
Date Cast:
Date Received:
Laboratory Measurements
Sample Number:
Date Tested:
Width (in.):
Height (in.):
Length (in.):
Received Weights (Ibs):
Immersed Weight (Ibs.):
Saturated Weight (lbs.):
Net Area DetennillllQon
I
3
8" plain stretcher
Contractor
IInlO6
11I10106
Top
Bottom
Face I
Face 2
Face I
Face 2
Sample Number:
Average Width (in.):
Average Height (in.):
Average Length (in.):
Net Cross Sectional Area (in1):
Remarks:
cc:
Specified Dimensions
IA
11I14/06
7.65
7.65
7.60
7.60
15.60
15.60
37.01
21.43
38.74
IB
11I14/06
7.65
7.65
7.60
7.60
15.60
15.60
36.85
21.34
38.51
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
lakeville, MN 55044
Phone 952.4693644
Fox' 9524698599
Web: brauninterleccom
Project Number:
BU>5-04456A
Project Description:
Village Commecce Building
Prior Lake, MN
Nominal Width (in.): 8
Width (in.): 75/8
Height (in.): 7~8
Length (in.): 15 5/8
IC
11/14/06
7.65
7.65
7.60
7.60
15.60
15.60
37.41
21.67
39.08
IA IB IC Average Spcci ficalions
75/8 75/8 75/8 75/8 14/8 to 76/8
75/8 75/8 75/8 75/8 14/8 to 76/8
15 5/8 155/8 155/8 155/8 154/8 to 156/8
63.07 62.56 63.44 63.02
;gi B~
Jo Ni~)
Project Manager
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since /957
II
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Braun Inlertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
lakeville, MN 55044
Constructing and Testing Masonry Prisms (Ungrouted)
Used to Determine Compliance with Specified Compressive Strength of Masonry
ASTMC1314
Date:
December 5, 2006
Client:
Gr-eystone Construction Company, mc.
Golllie Schmitz
500 S. Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee, MN 55379
SpecimeD Description
Block Type:
Nominal Size:
Supplier:
Mortal" Type:
Location:
Obtained By:
Date Pr-epared:
8ft plain stretcher
8
Contractor-
S
Grid A-I
JNlBraun mtertec
11107/06
Sample DimensioDs
Specimen Number:
Date Received:
Date Tested:
Average Width (in.):
Average Length (in.):
Average Capped Height (in.):
Mortal" Joint Thickness (in.):
Height-to-Minimum Thickness Ratio:
Test Results
Test Age (days):
Ultimate Load (lbs.):
Test Area (in. sq.):
Net Area Compr-essive Strength (PSi):
Correction Factor-:
Corrected Compr-essive Strength (psi):
28-day Compressive Strength (psi):
Average 28-day Compressive Strength (psi):
Specified Strength:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Village Commer-ce Building
Prior- Lake, MN
IA
11110/06
12/05/06
7.66
15.64
15.79
24/64
2.06
28
122,330
63.02
1940
Loo
1940
1940
IB
11I10/06
12105/06
7.63
15.63
15.78
26/64
2.07
28
132,360
63.02
2100
1.01
2120
2120
Remarks: The average 28 day test r-esult meets or- exceeds the specified strength.
cc:
IC
11I10/06
12/05/06
7.61
15.65
15.79
24/64
2.07
28
157,730
24.00
6570
1.01
6640
6640
3570
1500
Phone 9524693644
Fox 95246'185'1'1
Web: braunintertec.com
BL-05-04456A
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
'"
o
---
r--
---
o
Oi
...
<OS
~
t:
Q
Co
..
a:
N
N
0'1
..,N
:i~
E-<:;E
=E-<
.9 en
~<
[-g
E.c
0....
UGl
'C~
]~
f;l;cE-<
Z
:It
C
II
.
U
LLJ
J-
~
w
J-
Z
~~o,
.., on \0
;j '0 \0
u:i::E
~q ~
""'''00
!il 5 '''of
ciiO
E
J 8 ~
g
...
co
Qj
..." 0
o ...,
::E;!,
...
.. ~
~~
~
'"
00
v
v
.. 0
... .
.!. :g
f'~
j:l.,al
0\
M
"0
t'l
o
~
bOO
.s 3
.., 0
::::u
~~
..."0
o t'l
... 0
...~~
~]
00 a)'
Uo-a
~z ...l
~.l<:S
:::: a'c
>ll.t:l.
o
.s
;;;
a
~
e
o
U
I::
~g -g 0\
00 t--
g~ :;:
~~ z
U ~ 2
~ao"'-
~B::E~8.
fl~lZl...~
__ cu o.t:: cd
Oc5~~~
~
~
"'38~
~ ~:3 .g
u. u
.. ..
~~ s
o
U
I::
~ .g
-5 u .-..
as ~ ~
~g~
u
c'U
08
~ G-
o: "a
.so
.. ..
~a~
~.~ 0
.s~
... E
....Q
Cd E U
~88
.t'Q
GJ I7lI tJ
~5,e.
o
0:0:000
.~_ e e t t 5
o o.c.c.c
_~ I- 1-_ ~ ~ ~
~ "6- "6 1::- 1::- s::r
uooooo
E---- '"'" .... tI1 rn ~
-o~~~~~
~.3.3~~~
e
E
~ g
m E2
oS
vvvvv
Vl V') '0 Vl V'1
00000
("') ~ ~ ("') (""'1
NNNNN
41]:
-g,s
... 0..
r:>.. ..
o
NNNNN
- --
~~
o ..
~..>o:
- ..
'" ..
~~
l-I-l-l-l-
00000
E'>:
~~
8~
coco<<<t:
V) 00 ~ Vl to
0"\0\0\0\0\
C"'I'1 \0 0\ Vl t'-
0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0'1
N N
::::-
~:!:~
-
~O\
-N~
OO~~O
~o~:!::!
ooo~o
'CiNMooo
N N ('f') N ("f1
- -
8 N
]d:d:d:d:d:
<n
\0 \0 \0 \0 \0
U$2S2S2eo
1aC""lC"1Vv)~
000000
- - -
-
'"
.. ....
.,0
~
'"
~-N('f)VlO
'"
-~
s
~ ~
~ ~
In
~ti
CieIl
q II
!-In
OC:O
C!
a .9
.15 3
os":
fn ~ 'u
g.o ~
-::: cu rn
os 0. ..
o .. '"
s -s '0
~ .~ ~
5r >. .;
-s o.-s
.~ ~ -~
>.0;>,
0..150-
E '" E
000
u '" u
~ ~ ~
~~]
~ ~ ~
.. .. ..
.. .. ..
.. E-< E-< E-<
t' II II II
:.d<c:ou
c-
OQ
.0 u
j8
~.~ -::::
So
::E
~r--
0\.0
~~
.5 ~
0. '0
o::E
~~
N M
c:l
.9
~ ::E
to:: U <Il
";; <n ~
l(/ r/1
o
8 0 ~
'0 d.. 0...
<n
c::
.9
1;;
>
..
Ul
"""t-vco
\0 \0 \0 V)
0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
..
u
c::
~
~
..
0:
c::
o
';:J
..
>
..
Ul
c::
.9
c-
.t::
~ <
~ ~
-9
1;;
u
o
.....l
01) bl)
13 -E
.~ -~
.. ...
.s .s
.... ....
o 0
-" ..
V1 0
...,
,
"-
~
0\
V1
0--
'0<
s::..."
in .C
MO
<.;;; ~
~~-s~-s
~~~~~
~~::E~::E
... ...
.. ..
3: Cl 3: ...
~ 'a ~ 3:
~~ ~~
.~ ~.~ ~
<Il~<ncii
aaaa
l"-< I>< l"-< l"-<
c::-e-e-5-e
.9 s:: s:: s::l s::
tu~~e~
gl-I-I-I-
:: @@@,g
~::J::J::J::J
e
cn-Nm~
..
l-
...
..
3:
...
<I)
E1
o
cii
~
.s:::
u
I::
..
...
I-
@
::J
c
Q)
E
::l
o
..co
0.-0
~Q)CD
oEo
'Q)O
~~~
~ a.~
Q) 0.-
.- <a 0
2_0
......
o
..
01)
os
p..
"0
;E
.,
Z
.s:::
0.
~
o
-,
~
OJ
-t::
0.
o
...
r:>..
"0
a
11
~
..
..."
t;::
c::
o
(J
~
N
...;
..
>
\0
!2
~
-
---
o
~
....
0<1
t:l
....
...
o
Co
41
~
N
N
0\
fIlN
t;t:l
~::;
CE-<
000
~<
='0
c.o
E'i3
o 41
U::;
'0....
- fIl
41 41
~E-<
~ ~Il
11. i! 0\
~Vl\O
t: -- '>0
ro 0
Vl~
"0 >.
~ .;;
t: 5
So
en
N
N
00.
N
E
E
:l
~9
-=:
t:
:l
'"
m
v
V'l
C>
.....
N
"0
"0""
o """
~""
...
o
o X
~ 0
<U ...
L ~lf-J
0-
M
-0
<U
o
cG
;>..
~~
:a 0
~u
~o;>j
<1)-0
o '"
~~Z
:aE~;:E
V'l E ~ .
"<toC;<I)
"""Uo7i!
;;9<1)~.....l
<.IV) OOt'--o L..o
4Io",~o
'0 . :::: a';::
~ ai:; 0.. 0..
o
..5
>.
t:::
'"
0-
E
o
u
s:::
0-0
';:: ~
gcG
.1::-
"'t;l
5-5
u'"
vaov
S:::;:Eo&
;.:.9 ('f") 0
C >', fZl ~ 7i!
~ ~g.E.c:
UOV'lfZlfZl
'"
c
~ .2
.g ~
(tit+::
~ t3 .~
.~ -~ R-
1i ;r~
t;::.co
-~ .~ :t
E} >. -;,:;
.c 0..-5
.~ g .~
>-.. <> >.
a.o}
E ~ 0
8 ~ u
~~~
:l ::> '"
~ 11 ~
rn i1 :.:
~f-<f-
~ ;:. II II II
~-o~"':alU
a
1::
a 0
.D
'u 0
';:: cx:
.r:: c-
o 0
OJ l':
f- 0
"0 "0
., c
ii: ...:
9
E """
3 0 V)
E 0
'" M
... g N
en
'"
-=:
~
.8.s;::M
e 0.
c.. 0
a
~~
o 0
~~b
- 0
'" '"
OJ~
f-
"'~
5 ~
E .><: al
E ~
o~
U
~
~
-g~gV)
S E 'B 0\
t) .- a;I:
8,,5 0..
r:rJ ~ g
u
o
,~
1U
~
c
o
"B - '3:.
~~
E
o
u
c~
o.e~
~ .f-
~ ~
-=:0
OJ 0
...
0 ~ ~ 00
<U
Ei:: '0 0
-=: ~
'a
t 0
1U E
~8
c~
U 0\
.e
,f-c
tt ~ &.
~o.....-
o
9 8
.0 ct
en
0-
t-
M
V)
V)
-0
o
o ;:0
1ii _
o 2>
-
~
"'.....
00
~
>-..
Qc
~~t"-:
-J;::!
~ .~
8 5
.x 0
'"
~
,
~
~
800-:
::> ...
.5 ~ :::!:
E.. '0
o~
c
,2
1U
U
t;;
.;;;
'"
~
u
~
fZl
rL
r:rJ
9 8
.0 cL
en
c
.9 00
OJ 0\
:>
o
W
;;
~
o 0
g 0
o
...
~
o ...
cx: g
t: <;:;
.2 "0
~ 0
:> -;i
o .;:::
Wt;;
c
-~
E
'" ~
~ ~
f- u
_ <r>
-~ ~
Clal
II II
f-<<r>
aal
t:
.2
.s.
...
U 00
'"
o
a .(
c 0
,2 :2
1U "0
g Oi:
.....lO
~
t'-
-
-
~
~
...
o
-C
o
.5
s:::
o
.~
U
o
.....l
ii:
(;j
~
<>
::>
...
Vl
~
o
f-
9
\0
C
Ql
E
::l
o
.s:::0
0."0
Ql41co
~:5o
'QlO
- > N
!100>
GlL.......
..... a.
~ 0.-
Gl(Oo
2_0
.....
o
o
00
os
c..
-0
~
.,
z
-a
o
'"
o
-.
c
'"
.,
'C
0.
o
...
c..
]
3
<:
o
"0
t;;
c
o
U
~
N
..;
o
;>
\0
f2
t-
N
-...
o
.....
G;
-
ell
/:l
1:
o
p.
..
IX
M
M
0\
~M
:lQ
E-<:g
r::IE-<
.2 Vl
t<
~..g
E.r::I
0-
Ui
'1:1_
] ~
~E-<
" ~
az",
" fIl '"
;; '0 \0
v;~
~ON
as ";; N
" '" co
a U N"
V;O
c
v
E
'" -.r
!:: Vl
.5 9 ~
N
<::
'"
'"
...
a:l
<>
" 0
o M
~;;
...
v
v X
~ e
~I-
0-
M
-0
'"
o
ex:
:>-.
~E
._ ::l
-0 0
:::u
tilc($
v-o
(.) '"
to;z:
~S~:E
V)S~
-.ro-oJ
-.rug.:.::
+; 9 v'- '"
.!!.:g oo;z: ..J
. . ~ ~ C5
e ..J::: a '':
Q.,co>p.p.
(.)
.5
;;.,
c
'"
0.
S
o
U
c
.g -g
(.) 0
2IX
~:::::
c '"
o..c
U ~
~~o<U
+;g:Eg&
r::I~(/)v~
.~ ~ o..-=: as
GO~~rJ3
~ E
l;::.: '"
0.5
&.s
Vl~
'"
~ .g
.::. (,)-.
~ a*
<>6'-'"
0::: 0
U
v v
~ a
ii: .E
.5~
... E
v v
~ is
~8
.f'e
GJ V,l t)
"> a:: 0..
;:>Q'-'"
0\
t-
M
V)
V)
~
fIl
v......
~o
~
~ _9
.9 Fj
Git.;::
Jg S "2
.~ &:
" on -0
~ ~.~
~ 3: .~
on >. '"
-5 c...c
-~ ~-~
>.">.
0..150..
e c e
000
u -0 "
on on on
33-3
on on '"
~ ~ ~
;; en CI1
u u ..
..!--t-!--
-Nt-Haa
-::t:<t:a:lU
000
1:: 1:: 1::
v ... v
.0 .0 .0
000
o:::c.::c.::
c-
O
~
v
"
'"
~
ci'
o
fIl
...
V
"
<::
~
9
'" c
'" ...
d E
... '"
a:l ...
1;;
.5
-.r v v -.r -.r -.r
t.t"}t(')'OV)'l')""
000000'
M C"l M ("f1 M M
NNNMNN
..---
ue..
.o..c
o E.
0: ...
o
NMNNNN
-
... ..---
" >-.
o v
~~
:l~
I-
1-1-1-1-1-1-
000000
E~
~~
8~
~~~~~~
~
'"
.g
tJ
'"
0..
E
o
u
V) Vl tn V) V) V)
0\ 0'\ 0'\ 0\. 0\. 0'\
t-...ot-oo...or-
0'- 0'\ 0'\ 0\ 0'\ 0\
c~
05_0
NO -
~ C
tU "U;
Ii: '"
Eo
~oor-\.Ooot-r-
o
CO <::< 00<::<0
00\.-""':0\0000
5
0<::<<::<<::<<::<0
or-oo 000\
N - M -
.....
8("",)MMMMM
000000
.0 r:t cL rL ~ ci.. ~
Vl
-... -...
00
-
fIl
~r--oo"';::
ci'
o
~
v
"
C
~
c
o
.;;;
'"
E
~ ~
~ u
tiCfl
u-'"
.!:l U
Oa5
" II
I-Cfl
Oa:l
\0
i:-
De
.0 tJ
jS~
E .f'
'" '"
E ~
.~ 0
~
E ';f?
'" ~
E = ~
0. .~
o~
'"
o
.~ ::E
t3 r/}
.;;; cL
~ Vl
U
9 8
.0 cL
Vl
'"
o
.E 00 00 0'\ 0\ 0\ 00
> "''''''''''''''''
v
W
.2 .2 .e .e .e v
Q)1U~tu1Utii~
0>>>>>0
~QJlUClJCUQ)O
~wwwww"'"
~ ""'" ..... .... .... ....
QJOOOOOL-o
o:::ooooog
",1i:1i:1i:ii:1i:c
0-0-0-0-0-0-0
".g ~ 1! ~ ~ ~ u
>- In (f} fI'.:l ~ Q') .s:::
... 'c 'c 'c 'c -a .~
Wii:ii:ii:ii:ii:tE
c:
.Sl
E.
'C
tJ
'"
v
o
a::
o
.~
tJ
o
..J
~ -.r
00 'ON
'\OMN'OO
on . \0
a:iDD~a:i...-(
II) U 0 GJI U t)
.S .S .5 .5 .S .5
:9:9:9:9:9:9
.... """" .... """ .... '""
000000
~:;:;;::;~t;;
:S:S~~~~
.... .... .... .... .... ....
.g .g .g .g .~ .8
]]~~j~
'"
Oii:ii:ii:ii:ii:ii:
.~
(.)
o
.....:l
aJ<<ttUGSasCi:i
a a a a a a
u u U <.1 (.) u
:;222225
f-ci){;jci5cii~(I)
9
-
'"
v
I-
t-ooO\O-~
,
~
c
Cp
E
::l
o
.co
a. -0
g:CP(O
050
'cpa
~~~
CP....N
'P 8:-
.!!! tll 0
2_0
.....
o
v
tl/)
'"
""'
"
~
v
Z
..c
a.
v
'"
o
.....
~
.~
Ci..
o
...
""'
-0
a
:"@
E
...
-0
l;::
'"
o
U
on
N
...:
u
>
Moisture-Density Relationship
131
I I
~i
-JI
I
I
I
'"
"
'\.
I
!
-+
I
i
126
121
-
o
a.
/'"
/
.V
/
IV
-L-
'~-
'--+~
I i I
Y ----t--,
Iii
./'
I
I
i !
---+-------t
I ,
1--1
!
+.--
i
!
I
Z.
'iii
c
(J)
-0
~
o
...,
"'....
'~
"-
r--.
I
I
!
I
116
i
i
I I
--t
-----L-+ i
: I !
: ++
i
I
,
i
----or
I
111
i I I
I !
, i I
, I i
I I I
I
t----- I
I I ! i I
; , i I
i ,
I I I r .-- .--- : T
106 I I
, i
6 8 10 12 14
Water content, %
Test specification: ASTM D 698-00a Method B Standard
Elevl
Depth
Nat.
Moist.
Sp.G.
Classification
USCS AASHTO
SC
2.65
TEST RESULTS
Maximum dry density = 119.9 pcf
Optimum moisture = 12.2 %
Project No.: BL-05-04456A Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Project: Village Commerce Building Prior Lake, MN
IN
. Source:
Sample No.: P -0 I
BRAUNw
INTERTEC
. e----
i
i
i
ZA V for
Sp.G. =
2.65
16
1~
r
18
LL
PI
%>
3/8 in.
No.200
%<
5.0
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Clayey Sand, fine-medium grained, brown
Remarks:
Specific Gravity was assumed.
10/04/06
Moisture-Density Relationship
\
\
\
,
1\
,
.\
\
\
, I
\i
\J
r\
\
\
\
r\
\
\
\
\
\
.~
118
I I !
I I I
I
I +~- I
;
I I
,
116
I
I
-
'\
\
\
\
I \
,
\
\:
114
-
U
0-
~
'w
c
Q)
-0
C
o
i
i :
I I
112
! !
:
i-H'~-l
I' ! L
I I I
I
-H
I
1
__ __ _n'
110
1
I
i
-J-
!
!
:
,
-~.-
__n
,
i I
'..
108
8
I
I
:
10
12
14
Water content, %
Test specification: ASTM 0 698-00a Method B Standard
Oversize correction a lied to final results
Elevl Classification
Depth USCS AASHTO
Nat.
Moist.
Sp.G.
SP-SM
2.65
TEST RESULTS
Maximum dry density = 116.7 pef
Optimum moisture = 13.6 %
Project No.: BL-05-04456A Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Project: Village Commerce Building Prior Lake, MN
IN
. Source:
Sample No.: P-02
BRAUNw
INTERTEC
I! i I I i
--+-- --t~n
, I! I !
1 I 1.;-
--r- i ! ' i
, 'I I i
'j ---j-r--r
+--+-.-
! :
!
I
I
I
I
I
-- ---
I
I
- t--- -~
I
L
I
-
+-1___
i I
I 1
-1--- I
ZA V for
Sp.G. =
2.65
20
16
18
II
%>
%<
PI
3/8 in.
No.200
6.0
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Poorly Graded Sand with Silt & Gravel, fine-
coarse grained, brown
Remarks:
Specific Gravity was assumed.
10/04/06
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6015970
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Gridline 0(2 to 3)
Sample LocationfNotes: Cylinders cast by the client no information given
I
10/3/06
3:04 pm
10/4/06
3
1.0
70
75
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
222
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert 0
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
1-01 I 6 7 60860 4.00 12.57 4,840 C N 02
1-02 I 27 28 71140 4.00 12.57 5,660 0 N EI
1-03 I 27 28 80910 4.00 12.57 6,440 C N EI
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
EI
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~00[]]
ABC 0 E
Cone Cone Cone Shear CokImnar
& &
Split Shear
~~~
Jo h Nietfeld
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6015971
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park: Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (OF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline A - 4,5, and 6
Sample LocationINotes: Cylinders cast by the client no information given
2
10/3/06
3 :07 pm
10/4/06
3
2.0
70
75
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
225
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds ) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
2-01 I 6 7 53560 4.00 12.57 4,260 D N D2
2-02 1 27 28 80200 4.00 12.57 6,380 D N EI
2-03 I 27 28 71680 4.00 12.57 5,700 D N EI
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break: Remarks: D2
EI
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[]0B[I]]
ABC 0 E
Cooe Cone Cone Shea, Columna,
& &
Split Shear
f.}~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 1117/06
Work Order: 6016090
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Ine
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. eF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline D - 2 and 3
Sample LocationINotes: Cylinders were cast by client no information given
3
10/4/06
3:28 pm
10/5/06
3
2.0
70
65
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
225
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds ) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code( s)
3-01 1 6 7 51840 4.00 12.57 4,130 D N D2
3-02 1 27 28 88860 4.00 12.57 7,070 D N El
3-03 1 27 28 77390 4.00 12.57 6,160 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
El
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[6]00[]]
ABC 0 E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Corumnar
& &
8pIit Shear
Jh~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6016092
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Aic(%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. eF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing
Sample LocationINotes: Cylinders cast by client no information given
4
10/4/06
3:32 pm
10/5/06
5
2.0
71
65
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
o
Not Given
2
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
4-01 1 27 28 93220 4.00 12.57 7,420 C
4-02 I 27 28 82130 4.00 12.57 6,540 D
Capping
Method *
N
N
Remarks
Code( s)
El
EI
Break Remarks: E I
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 123 I, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[J00[l]
ABC 0 E
Cooe Cone Cone Shear Corumnar
" &
Split Shear
~~
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 1117/06
Work Order: 6016315
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slwnp (in.): (ASTM C(43)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. eF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing, Elevator / Stairwell footings
Sample Location/Notes: Cylinders cast by client no information given
5
10/6/06
1:46 pm
10/9/06
01/4
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Nwnber:
Ticket Nwnber:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
o
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code( s)
5-01 3 4 7 49310 4.00 12.57 3,920 D N D2
5-02 3 25 28 73800 4.00 12.57 5,870 D N EI
5-03 3 25 28 82910 4.00 12.57 6,600 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
EI
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[6J00[]]
ABC 0 E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Cofumnar
& &
Split Shear
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 1117/06
Work Order: 6016317
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, ~
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. eF): (ASTM C (064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building lnterior, Pier, Gridline B - 3,4, and 5
Sample Location/Notes: Cylinders cast by client no information given
6
10/6/06
I :50 pm
10/9/06
01/4
0.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
1
Not Given
3
J\nderson,RobertD
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
6-01 3 4 7 58060 4.00 12.57 4,620 D N D2
6-02 3 25 28 86400 4.00 12.57 6,880 C N El
6-03 3 25 28 79620 4.00 12.57 6,340 D N EI
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, UnbondedCaps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
EI
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~Q;J00DJ]
ABC D E
Cone Cone Cone stlear Corumnar
& &
Split Shear
f}:~i~
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/8/06
Work Order: 6016571
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, [nc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Gridline 7.3 to 8.4 - A
Sample LocationfNotes: cylinders were cast by client, no information given
7
10/9/06
11 :31 am
10111/06
01/4
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
I
1
3
Anderson, Robert D
Sample No.
7-1
7-2
7-3
Field
Cure
(days)
2
2
2
Lab
Cure
(days)
5
26
26
Test
Age
(days)
7
28
28
Compression Test Results
Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Load Diameter Area
(pounds) (in.) (sq. in.)
61040 4.00 12.57
86710 4.00 12.57
86580 4.00 12.57
Strength
(psi)
4,860
6,900
6,890
Fracture
Type
D
D
C
Capping
Method *
N
N
N
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
EI
El
Break Remarks: D2
EI
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, UnbondedCaps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~0B[I]
ABC 0 E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
SpIt Shear
~i')
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/14/06
Work Order: 6016573
Client
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number.
Date Cast:
Time Cast
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline A - 8.4, 9.2, and 9.7
Sample LocationINotes: cylinders were cast by client, no infonnation given
8
10/11/06
11:37 am
10/11/06
5
0.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number.
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
I
I
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
8-1 0 7 7 69110 4.00 12.57 5,500 B N D2
8-2 0 28 28 90820 4.00 12.57 7,230 D N EI
8-3 0 28 28 92960 4.00 12.57 7,400 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 123 t, Unhonded Caps S = ASTM C6 t 7, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
EI
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~00[l]
ABC 0 E
Cooe Cone Cone Sheaf ColJmnaf
& &
8pIit Shear
g,~~
Jos Nietfeld
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company. Inc
Braun lntertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
11
Date: January 18,2007
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Priol' Lalie, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Tntnsmittal is being Sent:
__ For your approval
__ As requested
~ Ipr your records
I. or I'e\ ie'lI
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Reference Numbers
Set 11
Com ments/C la rit'ication
Report Dated J /17107
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins. City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz. Greystone Construction Company. inc
Brian Salfcr, LS Engineers
^ndy Krenik. Tushie Montgomery & Associates.lnc,
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests ( I )
Concrete Tests ( I)
Concrete Tests ( 1 )
Concrete Tests ( I)
Sent By:
Phone'
Susan P. Kolle
952-469-3644
1<('\',8' (, 11../
. Providing engineertng and environl11enlal solutio/ls SI/lCC 1<)5-
dRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder
Report Date: 1/17/07
Work Order: 7000193
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, ~
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C23 i)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, 1 st Floor; North End
Sample LocationINotes: Cast by client, no tests taken
11
1/4/07
8:19 am
1/8/07
5
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3500
Aggregate Industries
1 Not Required
3500
o
o
3
Client
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi)
11-01 4 3 7 118990 6.00 28.27 4,210
Fracture
Type
D
Capping
Method *
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
N
Break Remarks: D2
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[J00OJJ
ABC D E
Cooe Cone Cone Shear CokJmar
& &
Split Shear
~~
6RAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Braun Intertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No: 13
Date: February 05, 2007
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
Phone: 9524474230
Fax: 9524474245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
~ For your records
For review
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Daily Reports
Special Inspections
Reference Numbers
Set Numbers I I and 12
Reports dated 1/29 through 2/1/07
Report dated 1/29/07
Comments/Clarification
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins, City of Prior Lake
Brian Salter, LS Engineers
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests (1), Daily Reports (I), Special
Inspections (I)
Concrete Tests ( 1), Daily Reports (I ), Special
Inspections ( I)
Concrete Tests (1), Daily Reports ( 1 ), Special
Inspections (I)
Concrete Tests (1), Daily Reports (1), Special
Inspections ( 1 )
Gordie Schmitz, Greystone Construction Company, (nc
Andy Krenik, Tushie Montgomery & Associates,Inc.
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan K Graves
952-469-3644
Uel'.1i(1)4
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since /957
~IIlAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder
Report Date: 2/5/07
Work Order: 7000193
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project:
BL-05-04456A
Village Conunerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, ~
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM Cl43)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. COF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, 1 st Floor; North End
Sample LocationlNotes: Cast by client, no tests taken
11
1/4/07
8:19 am
1/8/07
5
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3500
Aggregate Industries
1 Not Required
3500
o
o
3
Client
Sample No.
11-01
11-02
11-03
Field
Cure
( days)
4
4
4
Lab
Cure
( days)
3
24
24
Test
Age
(days)
7
28
28
Compression Test Results
Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Load Diameter Area
(pounds) (in.) (sq. in.)
118990 6.00 28.27
150930 6.01 28.37
144680 6.01 28.37
Strength
(psi)
4,210
5,320
5,100
Fracture
Type
D
B
D
Capping
Method *
N
N
N
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
E1
E1
Break Remarks: D2
EI
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[6]0D
ABC 0 E
(';(}1!e Core Cope Shear Columnar
8. 8.
Sptit Shear
~~
. )
Jos Nietfe1d
....RAUN
I NTE RTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder
Report Date: 2/5/07
Work Order: 7000194
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, ~
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (oF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, I st Floor; South End
Sample LocationlNotes: Cylinders cast by client, no tests taken
12
1/4/07
8:22 am
1/8/07
5
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3500
Aggregate Industries
I Not Required
3500
o
o
3
Client
Sample No.
12-1
12-2
12-3
Field
Cure
(days)
4
4
4
Lab
Cure
(days)
3
24
24
Test
Age
(days)
7
28
28
Compression Test Results
Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Load Diameter Area
(pounds) (in.) (sq. in.)
I 19660 6.00 28.27
159880 6.01 28.37
149390 6.01 28.37
Strength
(psi)
4,230
5,640
5,270
Fracture
Type
C
A
C
Capping
Method *
N
N
N
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
E1
El
Break Remarks: D2
EI
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~00
ABC 0 E
C'XJOe Cone Cope har ColUfltnaf
&. &.
Sptit Shear
Qe4~J,
Jo ph Nietfl Cl
BRAUN'M
INTERTEC
DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT
Project #:
LV -0(0- 0 '1~t3
/ :++t~ &, ~~t^O
Report #:
Date:
1/21/07
I
Location:
Personnel
Classification
Regular
Hours
Overtime
Hours
s.~
AreasandworkperformedlhiSday:~ IS~ PL.L. ~<<aU ~ 6.::.;",,-
O~cK- ~n'~~1 ~ &Jfi-I( ~ Lby~~~ ~( f2,,~ ~ 6oK~k-
~~~r / ':
- _ ..i~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ E'. <if?J(3:-S) l
~"" ~ e~ i'O C!jc. ~
- 12~ ~/\/ ~ ~G 5c -<- 5j1-ec; 41 ( ~ v. ;j~ ~ t7 ~
Weather: t~ I ')oF'
Submitted To: \ J VV\ g (i'b~
Performed By: ~ 'IS"""" 6,/b'5
F: DAILY 1
DOR-Q1
BRAUN'M
INTERTEC
DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT
Project #: L V-OG, - OytJ~& B
Location: ~(-e.. & ('AS ,'1-\.1)
Report #: 7 '
Date: l 375 / Of
I t
Personnel
Classification
Regular
Hours
Overtime
Hours
__{II
,0
,~
, ~.,-.>
.::J
"
4<14/ ctf<1,'?Y t-E"
v
Weather:
~(<btv Jr
~ gVlJIVI'\
Performed 8y~
L.~", 6..- ~5
Submitted To:
F: DAILY 1
DOR-01
FIELD OBSERVATION FORM
L i i+\€- ~ Co:;, r'\O
Project # LV-b&.-OL(4~C06
Lot(s)
Soil Borings? Y( ) Nearest Soil Boring
N
t
j
'"
,g
tl 0 tI 0
t:l I;] 0
(
o
i=""./I:)~ + ,vo~ ~w-e(
TO d-"f~o{" E
c\~v f?o~ ~~~
dt\'~pe-r k....d c:t....,..,-
6
w
Block
Page
Date
Addition
Site ConditionslWeather
Constructor
Staked by
PC.L
of
N( )
s-
(,
F ~ -I-- obs-t. r~
J'I"f~~ l.A.,,^k~
/
<>
Notes
Write bottom elevations, date excavated, oversizing and type of bottom soils on sketch
<>
Lot Number
Block Number
House Type(s)
Front HD Elev.
Back HD Elev.
Lowest Elev.
Test Test Pass/ Test Test . Pass! Test Test Pass! Test Test Pass! Test Test Pass!
Elevation No. Fail Elevation No. Fail Elevation No. Fail Elevation No. Fail Elevation No. Fail
newtormstnelo-obs
BRAUN5M
INTERTEC
DAilY OBSERVATION REPORT
Project #:
Lv -0 (, - D 'i'lL/I., B
L:\~\~ l., ~~
Report #:
Date: 'J. / ' ! -0 I
Location:
Regular Overtime
Personnel Classification Hours Hours
JI\S~ ~""OH r: ~lJ ~J~(~- L-cd III:' &'(0
Areas and work performed this day: \';vv- \ l5vo.....--- G":)c.L) f2r. 2LwS4.J2 iLA- &~............
---tr tJb~ E~o~'^J lZ'1C C't;V~~'"' " S~ ~ ~ i4.r-~ S... (~-A \ \ ·
- ';i>~\""J E~""1t ~ +:~" I ~~ S V\-1) 1- Ci-t!-4 v-M --j.~,j~7
~~..r ~y- e(A~.a\\) --8~v~~I\ 'k;~ w) D.LP
Cl...R ~~~b ~ ~ ~r'^-'
Weather. c~ ~f
Submitted To: , 13 "'t>1.V;
Performed By:~ )q~ G'f\7SS
F: DAILY 1
DOR-{)1
...AU N'M
INTERTEC
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Page
of
Date of This Report:
Project No.:
fli!
Lv -0 -om&,6
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
/9P
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
fi Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
D Welding
o Boltin
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
~
. & .ffS-!i4 + ~~ A . E r-:::
flop! 8A.-/ vtvr"I;;/J,{ dr ~ fl:5 ~lz, ItP/J. t,E;:
! ift( ~Iv/ ;;Rtf ~ /4/ It ~ C. 7& 5/6
'f~
4S
UI,
hlr~
/ ~~CC-
List tests perfonned: U-. ~1. ~ d-'. >?C: /'1.l"V'5
;275//1 /15 ~ ~ -PC L
.
Are there any"discrepancies noted from this day's ohservations? Yes D
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
No~
NO)2S>\ )
.
.
To the best of our knowledge
applicable workmanship pro.
rk inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
ns of the UBC, except as noted ahove
;bf7
I
1.0. Numher:
Date:
(Whi copy co Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
Irm\sp,,~insp.4 1/25/95
FIELD OBSERVATION FORM
L i i+\~ ~ C05'. r'\O
Project # LV-D<O-Ol./ylj~6
Lot(s)
Block
Page
Date
Addition
Site ConditionslWeather
Constructor
Staked by
I of I
I/Zr/o-;-
f /
ehl4/'1 (~'r
PeL
Soil Borings? Y( ) Nearest Soil Boring
N( )
N
t
.3
'"
~
(, (..~ '7
o
A-
f.3~
hC~-k WfA.I / Poc...tr~J.
(-
D-
E-
1="~
.:ShIM ~.,~
W~///~
/
6-
w-
:1-
K'
<>-
-<.>
Write bottom elevations, date excavated, oversizing and type of bottom soils on sketch
Notes
Lot Number
Block Number
House Type(s) .
Front HD Elev.
Back HD Elev.
Lowest Elev.
Test Test Pass! Test Test Pass! Test Test Pass! Test Test Pass! Test Test Pass!
Elevation No. Fail Elevation No. Fail Elevation No. Fail Elevation No. Fail Elevation No. Fail
newtorrns/tlell1-obs
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: (Jreystone Construction Company. lnc
Braun Inteliec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
o
Date: December 08, 2006
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakevllle, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lal,e, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
~ For your records
For review
Information Sent
Masonry Tests
Reference Numbers
Grout Sample Number I
Com m ents/C la rification
Cast Date I 1/8/06
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins. City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz. Greystone Construction Company. lne
Brian Salkr. LS Engineers
Andy Krenik. Tushie Montgomery & Associates.lnc.
I Information Sent
Masonry Tests (1 )
Masonry Tests ( 1)
Masonry Tests ( I )
Masonry Tests (I)
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan P. Kolle
052-469.3644
Nn'. \'(j ().j.
. Providing engineering and environmental Sollll/OIlS .\lI7ce 1')5-
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company. lnc
Braun Intertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
x
Date: December 07,2006
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
SUite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lal{e
162"00 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lal{e, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lal{e, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
~ For your records
For review
Information Sent
Masonry Tests
Reference Numbers
Concrete Masonry - Set 1
Com m en ts/Clarification
Masonry Prisms - Set I (cast un 11/7 /()6)
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins. City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz. Greystonc Construction Company. Inc
Brian Salter. LS Engineers
Andy Krenik. Tushie Montgomery & Associates.lnc.
Information Sent
Masonry Tests ( 1 )
Masonry Tests ( 1)
Masonry Tests ( I )
Masonry Tests (1)
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan P. Kolle
952-469-3644
/((,\", ,\'(j 0-1
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units
ASTM C140 (Section 9.4, Net Area Determination)
Specifications per ASTM C90
Date:
December 5, 2006
1
3
8" plain stretcher
Contractor
11/7/06
11/1 0/06
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
lakeville, MN 55044
Phone: 952.469.3644
Fax 952469.8599
Web: brounintertec.com
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S. Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee, MN 55379
Sample Data
Set Number:
Number of Samples:
Type of Unit:
Supplier & Plant:
Date Cast:
Date Received:
Project Number:
BL-05-04456A
Project Description:
Village Commerce Building
Prior Lake, MN
Specified Dimensions
Nominal Width (in.): 8
Width (in.): 75/8
Height (in.): 75/8
Length (in.): 155/8
Laboratory Measurements
Sample Number:
Date Tested:
Width (in.):
Height (in.):
Length (in.):
Received Weights (lbs):
Immersed Weight (Ibs.):
Saturated Weight (Ibs.):
Top
Bottom
Face I
Face 2
Face I
Face 2
IA
II114/06
7.65
7.65
7.60
7.60
15.60
15.60
37.01
21.43
38.74
18
1I/14/06
7.65
7.65
7.60
7.60
15.60
15.60
36.85
21.34
38.51
IC
11/14/06
7.65
7.65
7.60
7.60
15.60
15.60
37.41
21.67
39.08
Net Area Determination
Sample Number:
Average Width (in.):
Average Height (in.):
Average Length (in.):
Net Cross Sectional Area (inl):
IA 18 IC Average Specifications
75/8 75/8 75/8 75/8 74/8 to 76/8
75/8 75/8 75/8 75/8 74/8 to 76/8
15 5/8 155/8 15 5/8 15 5/8 154/8 to 156/8
63.07 62.56 63.44 63.02
Remarks:
cc:
:Qi B~
]0 Ni~)
Project Manager
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Braun Interlec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 10 1
Lokeville, MN 55044
Phone 952.469.3644
Fox: 952.4698599
Web: brounintertec.com
Constructing and Testing Masonry Prisms (Ungrouted)
Used to Determine Compliance with Specified Compressive Strength of Masonry
ASTM C1314
Date:
December 5,2006
Client:
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
Gordie Schmitz
500 S. Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee, MN 55379
Project Number:
Project Description:
BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
Prior Lake, MN
Specimen Description
Block Type:
Nominal Size:
Supplier:
Mortar Type:
Location:
Obtained By:
Date Prepared:
8" plain stretcher
8
Contractor
S
Grid A-I
JNlBraun Intertec
11/07/06
Sample Dimensions
Specimen Number:
Date Received:
Date Tested:
Average Width (in.):
Average Length (in.):
Average Capped Height (in.):
Mortar Ioint Thickness (in.):
Height-to-Minimum Thickness Ratio:
IA
11/10/06
12/05/06
7.66
15.64
15.79
24/64
2.06
IB
11/10/06
12/05/06
7.63
15.63
15.78
26/64
2.07
lC
11/10/06
12/05/06
7.61
15.65
15.79
24/64
2.07
Test Results
Test Age (days):
Ultimate Load (Ibs.):
Test Area (in. sq.):
Net Area Compressive Strength (psi):
Correction Factor:
Corrected Compressive Strength (psi):
28-day Compressive Strength (psi):
Average 28-day Compressive Strength (psi):
Specified Strength:
28
122,330
63.02
1940
1.00
1940
1940
28
132,360
63.02
2100
1.01
2120
2120
28
157,730
24.00
6570
1.01
6640
6640
3570
1500
Remarks: The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
cc:
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Standard Method of Sampling and Testing Grout (Field)
ASTM CI019
Date:
December 7, 2006
I
11/8/2006
Not given
9
Grid (A-B) and (1-2)
25' up wall
Ultimate Load (Ibs.):
Compressive Strength (psi):
Type of Failure:
Avg. 28 Day Compressive Strength (psi):
28 Day Specified Strength (psi):
IA
3.50
3.54
6.54
< 5.00%
12.39
11/10/2006
12/6/2006
2
26
28
68,760
5550
Shear
18
3.56
3.54
6.46
< 5.00%
12.60
11/10/2006
12/6/2006
2
26
28
70,140
5570
Shear
Braun Intertec Carporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
lakeville, MN 55044
IC
3.53
3.51
6.62
< 5.00%
12.39
11/10/2006
12/6/2006
2
26
28
66,200
5340
Shear
5,490
3,000
Phone 952469.3644
Fox 952.469.8599
Web' braunintertec.com
Project Number:
Project Description:
Village Commerce Building
Prior Lake, MN
Masonry Units
. Type:
. No. Used:
Field Cure Temperature
. Maximum CF):
. Minimum (OF):
BL-05-04456A
Not given
Not given
Not given
Not given
Sample Data
Remarks The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
cc:
Client:
Greystone Construction Company, Inc.
Gordie Sclunitz
500 S. Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee, MN 55379
Field Data
Set Number:
Cast Date:
Mix Design:
Slump (in.):
Location:
Sample Number:
Average Width I (in.):
Average Width 2 (in.)
Average Height (in.):
Out of Plumb (%):
Area (sq. in.):
Laboratory Data
Date Received:
Date Tested:
Field Cure (days):
Lab Cure (days):
Test Age (days):
Test Results
Reviewed By:
fJl/!!.?ffJ 2
Project Manager
· Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Page ~ ot---/.
SIDRPT
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Special Inspedion Daily Re~
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
. Weather:
City of ?,. ; ()v L oJ~
<) tv \..'. (' r '\...\./ r ^ \ <; 4w r .it" t( Date of This Report:
\/, \ \ (1),0 ('Wv."""V/.O Project No.:
{2-,q-v~
r5L- Q ~~ oq 't -<;. 0A
0~~<:;~
<;UAV17
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
40 <>f:'
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
H Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
~Welding & Bolting
o Piles & Piers
o Rebar Placement
o Concrete Placement
o Tendon Placement
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
o Soils
o Special Cases
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (listed Below) No 0
(0
&r ~ r I 0 ~ \
A ~ II
J,)~ Y
A~~
I - / o. I
r-:--. "
I e~~ f~'V'\
n \'
h 0.,)--\-
2vJFIOo/ Gr,'c\ A-[)
~k ") c. Y'f>yCrJ.. V\\ J r1 0 \fJ
(o'^~;;:) \ v'>o \ ~ Gr' ~ ~
t€\J'Q ( r().) d, \) (". 'I^€~V\ ~ ~ u +vi
I
List tests performed:
. Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
. Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
. If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Yes 0
Yes 0
No ff
No t
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above.
Print Full Name:
~~
~^~l f>AJr.)"~!1 '-
Date:
{ 2.. -, Cf . 0 \,..,
(I;::, ')?,rc)7~~ ,~
Signed:
1.0. No.:
White copy 10 Braun Intertec file. Blue copy 10 Praject Site Representotive.
,
. Prooiding engineering and erwironmemal solutions since 1957
, .,"'"'.
Page_ of_
SIDRPT
BRAUN
I NTERTEC
SpeciClllnspedi.n Daily Report
Cityofn,-Or~KL
.s+ee.t~
Project Name: V: ({a.~ "'- (AW\M e r (-<-
Project Address: -yt ~ 0 t\~ \<" 1 JAJ.J
Client:
Weather:
Report No.:
Date of This Report:
\;l- \5--olP
'6L "0'::'- o4i.{5&-A
Project No.:
~c.
dient Project No.:
Temperature:
~s 0 F""
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
% Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
~ Welding & Bolting
tJ Piles & Piers
o Rebar Placement
o Concre1e Placement
o Tendon Placement
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
o Soils
o Special Cases
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
)
List tests performed:
. Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
. Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
. If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Yes 0
Yes 0
No ffu
No D
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBCNBC, except as noted above.
S;gned I~~~~~(\
Print Full Name, -/~!:I' ~ rl:x::.n
DOte.:
cZ - t5-of..o
52-</:< (p 82.- e~
t.D~ )ita..:
/
White copy to Braun 'nferfec file. Blue cOpy to Project Site Representative.
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Braun Intertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
12
Date: January 31, 2007
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
Phone: 9524474230
Fax: 9524474245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
~ For your records
For review
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Reference Numbers
Set Numbers 9 and 10
Comments/Clarification
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests (1)
Concrete Tests (1)
Concrete Tests (1)
Concrete Tests (1)
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins, City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz, Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Brian Salfer, LS Engineers
Andy Krenik, Tushie Montgomery & Associates,Inc.
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan K Graves
952-469-3644
Rev. I!. 6 IN
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder
Report Date: 1/29/07
Work Order: 7000191
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project:
BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, ~
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. COP):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location:
9
12/29/06
8:10 am
1/8/07
5
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3500
Aggregate Industries
I Not Required
3500
o
o
3
Client
Building Interior, Slab on Deck, 2nd floor; North End
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
9-01 10 I 11 94280 6.00 28.27 3,330 C N Bl
9-02 10 18 28 125460 5.99 28.18 4,450 D N El
9-03 10 18 28 123860 5.99 28.18 4,400 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: B 1 The test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical
age-strength relationship.
El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[g00[I]
C 0 E
Cone Shear Columnar
&
Shear
A
Corle
B
Cone
&
Spirt
Qt ~AO.
Joseph Nietfel
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder
Report Date: 1/29/07
Work Order: 7000192
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, ~
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. eF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location:
10
12/29/06
8:13 am
1/8/07
5
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3500
Aggregate Industries
1 Not Required
3500
o
o
2
Client
Building Interior, Slab on Deck, 2nd Floor; South end
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. ( days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
10-01 10 18 28 141140 5.99 28.18 5,010 D
10-02 10 18 28 144260 5.99 28.18 5,120 D
Capping
Method *
N
N
Remarks
Code(s)
El
EI
Break Remarks: E 1
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C6l7, Sulfur Caps
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~00[]]
ABC D E
Cooe Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Split Shear
~~
BRAUN
;INTERTEC
SIDRPT
Speciallnspedion Daily Report
City of ~ : 'i)/ 1. o.lq>
5 k \JL \u} n \ sLw I " ) Date of This Report:
V~\\(')<;"'_9 C()I/V'MI\J/l J. 8...)~ \c.~'\.,troiectNo.:
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
12- 7~ 0<0
,5( - \)""\ . oY ,'51.0/\
h vey c.Jn~
S\JV'\V\'r
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
RDf=
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
~ Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
>> Welding & Bolting
o Piles & Piers
o Rebar Placement
o Concrete Placement
o Tendon Placement
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
o Soils
o Special Cases
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (listed Below) No 0
Des~on and location of work completed:
'. ~O r Jb r') t
r;,,~ C
o
Le~\
;,\~J
VVJ i) wQv\ \-
I e..:R \
A ~J- S-
6)
p'o. k
,
Qo \'b ,\
~ "
~lr
ciicl t99l; ~elfol meel.
6,,', eX
r, \ lee \-
A-i)
R 00 S?
J '-\(~"'llj
(
vJe\cl\
I ~ 1 0, L
o..t--
N0
r\. \. ~ -t
101
ISCf ~
G~~ ~
\~ ( I<~:::,C
,/1 (}~).
",J. rr-
2 0,)-
0...+
\.VQ ~ J ~
rUG
(()\A~V \
c1 '-,)(VE'~ '^-\\I
/5\:) \~ c.-.-\
r-E' \./\ \ r \,V"
4- \')
(-lo,~- j\)a
d t<; l-tepo..'^y no~J
. Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
. Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project?
. If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Yes 0
Yes 0
No -[7
NoB--
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBCNBC, except as noted above.
Signed: ~k~-
Print Full Name: j)o. VhQ \ P- 6, v~v.-
12.- )-0\""
I D <,,'1.1 0 S ,--- sa:.
Date:
1.0. No.:
Whffe copy to Broun 'ntertec fi'e. muecopy to Praject Sffe Representative.
J J _' _~__ _ _ 'nC'7
Fire Sprinkler Plan Review
Date:
December J 1, 2006
Owner:
Location:
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Niollet Ave. SE
Prior Lake MN. 55372
Contractor: National Fire Protection
22275 Meadow Brook Ave. N.
Scandia MN 55
I. Separate permits arc required for the alarm system.
2. The 1999 ofNFP A 13 shall be the standard.
J. All materials shall be tested and installed per the listing.
4. All valves controlling water flow shall be monitored and secured including the PIV.
5. It is the responsibility of the fire sprinkler contractor to flush all main and branch lines.
6. Provide frost protection for all portions of the wet system.
7. Field verify all head locations and obstructions.
8. Secure all valves against tampering. All valves in public areas shall be locked
9. Provide a water resistant system plan at the each sprinkler riser to include the following information.
a. Total site plan
b. All valves
c. Riser locations
d. Areas served by individual risers
e. All main and auxiliary drains
f. Location of inspector's test
g. Alann panel location
10. For inspections eall (952) 447-9850 give the project building permit number (06-0874)
11. Seal all penetrations in rated walls in an approved manor.
12. Provide signage for all valves, drains and inspector's test.
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 1
Page 1
Date
Hvdraulic Desiqn Information Sheet
Name - VILLAGE COMMERCE BUILDING
Location - PARK NICOLLET AVE, PRIOR LAKE, MN.
Building - 2ND FLOOR
Contractor - INTERNATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
Calculated By - DOUG CARLSON
Coo5truction: ( ) Combustible (X) Non-Combustible
Occupancy - OFFICES
Date - 11-02-06
System No. - 1
Contract No. -
Drawing No. - 1
Ceiling Height -
S
Y
S
T
E
M
Ord.Haz.Gp. ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 3 () Ex.Haz.
( ) Figure Curve
(X) NFPA 13 (X) Lt. Haz.
( ) NFPA 231 ( ) NFPA 231C
Other
Specific Ruling
Area of Sprinkler Operat"l"on - 1500
Density - .1
Area Per Sprinkler - 200
Elevation at Highest Outlet - 30
Hose Allowance - Inside
Rack Sprinkler Allowance
Hose Allowance - Outsid~ - 100
Made By Date
------- Sys tern Type---~Spd:nkler INoz" z Ie
(X) Wet Make RELIABLE
( ) Dry Model FIFR
( ) Deluge Size 1/2
( ) Preaction K-Factor 5.6
( ) Other Temp.Rat.155
o
E
S
I
G
N
Note
Calculation
Summary
Flow Required - 336.37 Press Required - 49.56 At CITY
C-Factor Used: 120 Overhead 140 Underground
W
A
T
E
R
Water Flow Test:
Date of Test - 2004
Time of Test
Static Press - 72
Residual Press - 64
Flow - 1220
Elevation
Well
Proof Flow
Pump Data:
Tank or Reservoir:
Cap. -
Elev.-
Rated Cap.-
@ Press
Elev.
s
U
P
P
L
Y
Locat{on - 300' SOUTHWEST OF SITE
Source of Information - CITY WATER DEPT.
C
o
M
M
Commodity
Storage Ht.
Storage Method:
Class
Area
%
Location
Aisle W.
Palletized %
Solid Piled
Rack
S
T
o
R
A
G
E
Single Row----------r-l"-Conven. Pallet
Double Row () Slave Pallet
Mult. Row
( ) Encap.
( ) Non
( r"Auto .-1fto-iage
( ) Solid Shelf
( ) Open Shelf
R
A
C
K
-Flue Spacing
Longitudinal
-Clearanc-e: Storage to eel ling ---
Transverse
Horizontal Barriers Provided:
.....
o
o
.....
.....
o
.....
'"
o
.....
w
o
.....
.Ilo.
o
.....
en
o
;;00 ~
me
0 !:en l>>
~ od CD
..,
ooo::E iTl3: en
'" '" ..... III .....0 c:::
I . I CD m '0
;0 ;0 C/) ... C/) -c
C1IC1Iiii(J) (5 -<
!!. !!. 0"-.6 z ()
a. a. 0 "tJ
~ ~ -o.:cr " c
:n:cm" ;0 :<
m ('J)
O-mc: 1) -
:Etn@ :IJ ()
t: 0 -
.. !1! .. ~
.....~......
'" '" -I
~-o-o
G)~~
-0
3::
....
o
'"
o
~
m ;;0
.Ilo. en 0)
000
c en en
...... 00 CD
000
m
;;0
1)
'"
o
o
~
8
- -
c ~ 0
~ ....
N
~
&fo:r::r:ooo
_woo"''''.....
11l.s:m.. I
.c:(J)..-...-.(J)wm
3:~ o>~~ ar
III (iC1l.Q:(inrOi
@.33()33g:
::J o~~'-o"::J
C1I 0._ @ 0-
i- ~~
::J t:
a. @
.. ... ... ... ... ... ".
"'w..... .jll."'.....
:-"~8 cow",
. 0).
mWG) en' CD
o)WCD
......-0 O)......w
-oG)3:G>1)G>-o
en" "Ocn-O(J)
-3: -~-
s:
0-0
~~
PJ
o
00
o
o
~
"t:l
i
"tl
c8
OJ
3
tn
~
:I:
~
f
5"
p
.....
o
o
o
"
5
::E
..-.
z~
>0
.....0
i:>>
en
::0
o
i
.....
~
o
....
....
.....
~
:::2
go
Ql
3
z
~
c
~
B
o
011
....,
.....
0)
o
o
.....
00
g
'"
..J $ummary
~USTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 1
Page 3
Date
Fitting Legend
Abbrev. _______~~~_____ ___~___._.______"
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
o
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Generic Alarm Va
Generic Butterfly Valve
Roll Groove Coupling
Dry Pipe Valve
90' Standard Elbow
45' Elbow
Gate Valve
45' Grvd-Vle Elbow
90' Grvd-Vie Elbow
90' Grvd-Vle Tee
Detector Check Valve
Long Turn Elbow
Medium Turn Elbow
PVC Standard Elbow
PVC Tee Branch
PVC 45' Elbow
Flow Control Valve
PVC Coupling/Run Tee
Swing Check Valve
90' Flow thru Tee
45' Firelock Elbow
90' Firalock Elbow
Wafer Check Valve
90' Firelock Tee
Mechanical Tee
Flow Switch
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
.~.o Summary
~.uSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 1
Page 4
Date
Unadjusted Fittings Table
~._1!2 ___~__"_J________!-","~~.~-- ~_~.~__. ~j!L-.__~___~ 1/2...-__4- ----
A
B
C
o
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
o
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
x
y
z
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
7.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
7.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
4.5
2.0
2.0
7.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
10.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.5
3.0
8.0
2.0
3.0
8.0
6.0
2.0
1.0
7.0
6.0
6.0
3.0
10.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
8.0
2.0
3.0
9.0
8.0
2.0
1.0
9.0
8.0
8.0
4.0
10.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
3.5
8.5
3.0
4.0
11.0
10.0
2.0
18.0
1.0
11.0
10.0
1.8
3.5
8.5
10.5
5.0
7.7
10.0
1.0
9.5
6.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
6.0
10.8
4.0
5.0
12.0
12.0
3.0
2.0
14.0
12.0
2.2
4.3
10.8
12.5
6.0
21.5
10.0
1.0
17.0
7.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
5.0
13.0
14.0
5.0
6.0
13.0
15.0
4.0
29.0
2.0
18.0
15.0
2.6
5.0
13.0
15.5
7.0
10.0
1.0
8.0
3.0
1.0
3.5
8.0
17.0
5.0
6.0
19.0
17.0
8.0
17.0
12.0
1.0
28.0
10.0
4.0
2.0
3.5
7.0
16.0
14.0
8.0
8.0
35.0
22.0
20.0
3.4
8.8
10.3
16.0
22.0
10.0
5 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24
-.------. ---~_._--
A 17.0 27.0 29.0
B 9.0 10.0 12.0 19.0 21.0
C 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0 47.0
E 12.0 14.0 18.0 22.0 27.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 61.0
F 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 24.0 28.0
G 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 10.0 11.0 13.0
H 4.5 5.0 6.5 8.5 10.0 18.0 20.0 23.0 25.0 30.0
I 8.5 10.0 13.0 17.0 20.0 23.0 25.0 33.0 36.0 40.0
J 21.0 25.0 33.0 41.0 50.0 65.0 78.0 88.0 98.0 120.0
K 36.0 55.0 45.0
L 8.0 9.0 13.0 16.0 18.0 24.0 27.0 30.0 34.0 40.0
M 10.0 12.0 16.0 19.0 22.0
N
0
p
Q 33.0
R
S 27.0 32.0 45.0 55.0 65.0 76.0 87.0 98.0 109.0 130.0
T 25.0 30.0 35.0 50.0 60.0 71.0 81.0 91.0 101.0 121.0
U 4.2 5.0 5.0
V 8.5 10.0 13.0
W 13.1 31.8 35.8 27.4
x 21.0 25.0 33.0
Y
Z 12.0 14.0 18.0 22.0 27.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 61.0
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
Ale I Flow Summary - STANDARD
~USTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT Page 5
REMOTE 1 Date
Node Elevation K-Fact pt Pn Flow Density Area Press
No. Actual "_______"".__"_~tuat_._____.____"".____~"__"__
1 30.0 5.6 13.81 na 20.81 .1 200 7.0
2 30.0 5.6 13.98 os 20.94 .1 200 7.0
3 30.0 5.6 14.61 os 21.4 .1 200 7.0
4 30.0 5.6 15.96 na 22.37 .1 200 7.0
6 30.0 5.6 12.76 os 20.0 .1 200 7.0
7 30.0 5.6 12.92 oa 20.13 .1 200 7.0
6 30.0 5.6 13.5 os 20.56 .1 200 7.0
9 30.0 5.6 14.75 na 21.51 .1 200 7.0
11 30.0 5.6 15.98 os 22.39 .1 150 7.0
12 30.0 5.6 16.69 os 22.88 .1 200 7.0
13 30.0 5.6 17 .42 os 23.38 .1 200 7.0
5 30.0 22.59 na
10 30.0 22.85 os
14 30.0 23.22 ns
73 30.0 24.65 ns
74 30.0 26.24 ns
75 30,0 30.76 na
TEE 0.0 45.67 ns
BAS 0.0 45.93 ns
SPG 0.0 49.19 ns
CITY 0.0 49.57 oa 100.0
The maximum velocity is 12.28 end it occurs in the pipe between nodes 4 and 5
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
....alculations - Standard
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 1
Page 6
Date
Hyd.
Ref.
Point
Qa
Dia.
Fitting
or
Eqv. Ln.
Pipe
Ftng's
Total
pt
Pe
Pf
pt
Pv
Pn
Notes .**.*.
lieu
Qt
Pf/UL
*fr**"'*.
1
to
2
2
to
3
3
to
4
4
to
5
6
to
7
7
to
8
_______...._u'u
8
to
9
9
to
10
11
to
12
------.,.
12
to
13
13
to
14
5
to
10
10
to
14
14
to
73
20.81
20.61
-----
20.94
41.75
21.40
63.15
22.37
85.52
0.0
85.52
20.00
20.0
20.13
40.13
20.57
60.7
21.51
62.21
0.0
62.21
22.39
22.39
22.66
45.27
23.37
66.64
0.0
66.64
85.52
85.52
82.21
167.73
68.64
236.37
1.687
120
0.0139
1.687
120
0.0502
1.687
120
0.1080
1.687
120
0.1892
1.687
120
0.0129
1.687
120
0.0466
1.687
120
0.1004
1.687
120
0.1759
1.687
120
0.0159
1.687
120
0.0583
1.687
120
0.1260
3.26
120
0.0077
_0__-
3.26
120
0.0266
3.26
120
0.0502
0.0 12.500 13.807
0.0 0.0 0.0
__~__12.500___J!.174 "__n______~el = ~~_____"
0.0 12.500 13.981 K Factor = 5.60
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 _~~Qg____~~_27
0.0 12.500 14.608
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 12.500 ______"_ 1.350
iT 10.044 25.000 15.958
0.0 10.044 0.0
0.0 35.044 6.830
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1T 10.044
0.0
0.0
2E
5.022
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
iT 10.044
0.0
0.0
21
6.72
0.0
0.0
_.v____.
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.72
0.0
0.0
K Factor:;:: 5.60
Vel:;:: 5.99
K Factor = 5.60
Vel = 9.06
K Factor = 5.60
Vel = 12.28
22.588
12.500 12.755
0.0 0.0
12.500 0.161
12.500 12.916
0.0 0.0
12.500 0.583
12.500 13.499
0.0 0.0
12.500 1.255
__"_..____v...._n..,..____
36.000 14.754
10.044 0.0
46.044 8.098
K Factor = 17.99
K Factor I: 5.60
21
Vel:;:: 2.87
------
K Factor = 5.60
Vel:;:: 5.76
K Factor = 5.60
Vel = 8.71
K Factor:;:: 5.60
Vel = 11.80
35.000
10.044
45.044
12.500
0.0
12.500
36.000
10.044
46.044
22.852
15.981
0.0
0.714
18.695
0.0
0.729
17.424
0.0
5.800
K Factor = 17.20
K Factor = 5.60
Vel = 3.21
K Factor:;:: 5.60
Vel:;:: 6.50
K Factor:;:: 5.60
Vel = 9.85
21.000
13.440
34.440
14.000
0.0
14.000
15.000
13.440
28.440
23.224
22.588
0.0
0.284
-'~"--"._-
22.852
0.0
0.372
23.224
0.0
1.427
Vel:;:: 9.09
K Factor;:; 14.24
Vel = 3.29
Vel:;:: 6.45
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
....alculations - Standard
custOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 1
Hyd.
Ref.
Point
Qa
Dia.
ne"
Qt
Pf/UL
Page 1
Date
Fitting Pipe Pt Pt
or Ftng's Pe Pv *'****** Notes "'_..,,**
Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn
~.~---~-------------~---------~~
73 0.0 3.26
to 120
74 236.37 0.0502
74 0.0 3.26
to 120
75 238.37 0.0502
----~._---------_.
75 0.0 3.28
to 120
TEE 238.37 0.0502
--~-.-
TEE 0.0 4.28
to 120
BAS 238.37 0.0138
BAS 0.0 4.26
to 120
SPG___ 238.37 0.0136
SPG 0.0 8.18
ro 140
CITY 238.37 0.0017
100.00
336.37
11 6.72 25.000 24.851
0.0 8.720 0.0
0.0 31.720 1.591
0.0 90.000 26.242
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 90.000 4.518
...-~_.-
11 8.72 14.000 30.758
1J 17.471 24.191 12.993
____~____~~~191 ___"~__'!.~~---------- Vel = _ 9.0~__"
11 9.217 10.000 45.667
0.0 9.217 0.0
0.0 19.217 0.262
-.-.----.--------------.
1G 2.633 1.000 45.929
1B 15.8 18.433 3.000
0.0 19.433 0.265
14.346 150.000 49.194
4.304 88.860 0.0
35.864 218.880 0.372
_._-~.._,--,-
Vel=~
Vel = 9.09
Vel = 5.32
---~_._--_._--~--
.. Fixed loss = 3
Vel = 5.32
21
1G
1J
Vel = 2.54
-~._-_._-~-
Qa = 100.00
K Factor = 47.78
49.568
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
~USTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 2
Page 1
Date
Hvdraulic Desian Information Sheet
Name - VILLAGE COMMERCE BUILDING
Location - PARK NICOLLET AVE, PRIOR LAKE, MN.
Building - 2ND FLOOR
Contractor - INTERNATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
Calculated By - DOUG CARLSON
Construction: ( ) Combustible (X) Non-Combustible
Occupancy - OFFICES"
Date - 11-02-06
System No. - 1
Contract No. -
Drawing No. - 1
Ceiling Height -
S
Y
S
T
E
M
Ord.Haz.Gp. ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 3 () Ex.Haz.
( ) Figure Curve
(X) NFPA 13 (X) Lt. Haz.
( ) NFPA 231 ( ) NFPA 231C
Other
Specific Ruling
Area of Spiinkler--Operation - 1500
Density - .1
Area Per Sprinkler - 200
Elevation at Highest Outlet - 30
Hose Allowance - Inside
Rack Sprinkler Allowance
Hose Allowance - Outside - 100
Made By Date
Sprinkler/No-izle
Make RELIABLE
Model FIFR
Size 1/2
K-Factor 5.6
Temp.Rat.155
'"System Type
(X) Wet
( ) Dry
( ) Deluge
( ) Preaction
( ) Other
D
E
S
I
G
N
Note
Calculation
Summary
Flow Required - 313.63 Press Required - 61.25 At CITY
C-Factor Used: 120 Overhead 140 Underground
Water Flow Test:
Date of Test - 2004
Time of Test
Static Press - 72
Residual Press - 64
Flow - 1220
Elevation
Pump Data:
Tank or Reservoir:
Cap. -
Elev.-
W
A
T
E
R
S
U
P
P
L
Y
C
0
M
M
S R
T A
0 C
R K
A
G
E
Rated Cap.-
@ Press
Elev.
Well
Proof Flow
Location - 300' SOUTHWEST OF SITE
Source of Information - CITY WATER DEPT.
Location
Aisle W.
Palletized %
Class
Area
%
Commodity
Storage Ht.
Storage Method:
Rack
Solid Piled
-(l sin g Ie R'ow~f"Conven-:'-PalIet---.( ) Auto'~--"sforage--(T" Encap .---"-~-'------
( ) Double Row () Slave Pallet ( ) Solid Shelf ( ) Non
( ) Mult. Row ( ) Open Shelf
Flue S.pacing-------------"..-------clearance: Stor-agetoCei1 ing~-"---._-."-.-".--~--.-
Longitudinal Transverse
Horizontal Barriers Provided:
....
o
I\)
o
~
m
~ 01
o 0
;;0
0)
o
c
Cj
(J)
~
en
<0
o
m
;;0
-0
()
~
ooo:E
I\) I\) ...... l>>
I I I CD
;;0 ;;0 en ..,
mmlig>
-. -. --0
a.. a.. 0,"
iii~
--(il"
.,,\lUl
-iUl
~Ul~
c:
.. ~..
~~j:j
1\)-0-0
OClJen
G)--
\l
3::
....
o
o
......
......
o
......
I\)
o
......
("J
o
......
~
......
01
o
()
o
3
"0
i
..,
"1J
a
(Q
m
3
tII
~
:J:
~
m
~
s-
f!
"'
1~ :;; be 0
...
no
t
cnOJ:J:OOO
~("J~gl\)l\)""
(I) I Ol (I) I I I
~fJ)__cncnm
3:~ O>~~ CD
m.... a...........<
ca ~ ~~. ~ (I) m..
-. m 0 3 0
;:] O;:]~-O"';:]
Ol a.._(iI 0'
3- Ul~
l>> Ul
;:] c:
0. (iI
.' .. .. .. .. .. ..
...... ("J ......, 0)1\)......
0......0 ............1\)
. ("J 0 . ("J.
c;i:nG) ~i:n~
o("J-o ......("J("J
-o~3::G)-oG>-o
en CIJ-ofJ)
-;s: -0-3::-
s::
~
o
8
g
o
g
......
o
o
o
."
5
:E
-
z~
>8
......
CD
01
~
c:
or
......
~
o
....
->.
->.
:E
5'
a.
::r
I>>
3
z
:x:
c
en
)>
e
~
.....
......
~
o
.....
CD
o
o
R1g ~
~(J) m
00 fir
rr1s: ~
1\)0 c:
m "C
en -c
C5 -<
z ()
." c:
~ ~
-0 -
:Il.O
o -
iT!
o
-I
0-0
et~
coOl
I\)
dS Summary
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 2
Page 3
Date
Fitting Legend
~bbre~"
Name
---------
-~~-------~-~--
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
o
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Generic Alarm Va
Generic Butterfly Valve
Roll Groove Coupling
Dry Pipe Valve
90' Standard Elbow
45' Elbow
Gate Valve
45' Grvd-Vic Elbow
90' Grvd-Vic Elbow
90' Grvd-Vlc Tee
Detector Check Valve
Long Turn Elbow
Medium Turn Elbow
PVC Standard Elbow
PVC Tee Branch
PVC 45' Elbow
Flow Control Valve
PVC CouplingIRun Tee
Swing Check Valve
90' Flow thru Tee
45' Firelock Elbow
90' Firelock Elbow
Wafer Check Valve
90' Flrelock Tee
Mechanical Tee
Flow Switch
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
d6 Summary
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 2
Unadjusted Fittings Table
1/2 3/4
A
B
C
o
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
o
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
x
y
z
1,0
2.0
1.0
1.0
7.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
7.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
Page 4
Date
__~~____L~ _ __~"___ 2 1/2_____L______~ 1/2____ -~ --
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
4.5
2.0
2.0
7.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
10.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.5
3.0
6.0
2.0
3.0
8.0
6.0
2.0
1.0
7.0
6.0
6.0
3.0
10.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
8.0
2.0
3.0
9.0
8.0
2.0
1.0
9.0
8.0
8.0
4.0
10.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
3.5
8.6
3.0
4.0
11.0
10.0
2.0
18.0
1.0
11.0
10.0
1.8
3.5
8.5
10.5
5.0
7.7
10.0
1.0
9.5
6.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
6.0
10.8
4.0
5.0
12.0
12.0
3.0
2.0
14.0
12.0
2.2
4.3
10.8
12.5
6.0
21.5
10.0
1.0
17.0
7.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
5.0
13.0
14.0
5.0
6.0
13.0
15.0
4.0
29.0
2.0
16.0
15.0
2.6
5.0
13.0
15.5
7.0
10.0
1.0
8.0
3.0
1.0
3.5
8.0
17.0
5.0
6.0
19.0
17.0
8.0
17.0
12.0
1.0
28.0
10.0
4.0
2.0
3.5
7.0
16.0
14.0
6.0
8.0
35.0
22.0
20.0
3.4
6.8
10.3
16.0
22.0
10.0
5 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24
..~,._---~---_.,'_.._---~_..
A 17.0 27.0 29.0
B 9.0 10.0 12.0 19.0 21.0
C 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
D 47.0
E 12.0 14.0 18.0 22.0 27.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 60.0 61.0
F 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 24.0 28.0
G 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 10.0 11.0 13.0
H 4.5 5.0 6.5 8.5 10.0 18.0 20.0 23.0 25.0 30.0
I 8.5 10"0 13.0 17.0 20.0 23.0 25.0 33.0 36.0 40.0
J 21.0 25.0 33.0 41.0 50.0 es.o 78.0 88.0 98.0 120.0
K 36.0 55.0 45.0
L 8.0 9.0 13.0 16.0 18.0 24.0 27.0 30.0 34.0 40.0
M 10.0 12.0 16.0 19.0 22.0
N
0
P
Q 33.0
R
S 27.0 32.0 45.0 55.0 65.0 76.0 87.0 98.0 109.0 130.0
T 25.0 30.0 35.0 60.0 60.0 71.0 81.0 91.0 101.0 121.0
U 4.2 5.0 5.0
V 8.5 10.0 13.0
W 13.1 31.8 35.8 27.4
X 21.0 25.0 33.0
Y
Z 12.0 14.0 18.0 22.0 27.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 61.0
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
..l.Ire I Flow Summary - STANDARD
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT Page 5
REMOTE 2 Date
Node Elevation K-Fact pt Pn Flow Density Area Press
No. __ Actual Actual -~-------_. Req.
-_._-~~-,.-
61 30.0 5.6 12.76 n8 20.0 .1 200 7.0
62 30.0 5.6 12.86 ns 20.06 .1 200 7.0
63 30.0 5.6 13.44 ns 20.53 .1 200 7.0
64 30.0 5.6 14.69 na 21.46 .1 200 7.0
65 30.0 5.8 17.23 na 23.25 .1 200 7.0
67 30.0 5.6 13.47 na 20.56 .1 200 7.0
66 30.0 5.6 13.61 ns 20.66 .1 200 7.0
69 30.0 5.6 14.22 n8 21.12 .1 200 7.0
70 30.0 5.6 15.54 na 22.08 .1 200 7.0
71 30.0 5.6 18.22 na 23.9 .1 200 7.0
66 30.0 21.0 ns
72 30.0 22.19 ns
73 30.0 37.73 na
74 30.0 39.18 na
75 30.0 42.92 ns
TEE 0.0 57.51 na
BAS 0.0 57.72 ns
SPG 0.0 60.94 ns
CITY 0.0 61.25 ns 100.0
The maximum velocity is 18.81 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 72 and 73
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 WIndham N.H. USA 03067
. ~alculations - Standard
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 2
Page 8
Date
Hyd.
Ref.
Point
Qa
Qt
Filling
or
Eqv. Ln.
Pipe
Ftng's
Total
Pl
Pe
Pf
Pl
Pv
Pn
**It****
Notes .........
61
to
62
---.-
62
to
63
.~_...
63
to
64
64
to
65
65
to
66
20.00
20.0
20.08
40.08
20.53
60.61
21.46
82.07
23.25
105.32
0.0
105.32
20.56
67
to
68
68
to
69
69
to
70
70
to
71
71
to
72
20.56
20.65
41.21
21.12
62.33
22.08
84.41
23.90
Dia.
"en
Pf/Ul
K Factor = 5.60
1.687
120
0.0129
1.687
120
0.0466
1.687
120
0.1001
1.687
120
0.1753
1.687
120
0.2782
0.0 8.000
0.0 0.0
0.0 8.000
._d..._____._
0.0 12.500
0.0 0.0
0.0 12.500
----.---
0.0 12.500
0.0 0.0
0.0 12.500
0.0 14.500
0.0 0.0
0.0 14.500
1T 10.044 3.500
0.0 10.044
0.0 13.544
12.755
0.0
.___~.J9_~_._____-'yel == ~.:.~Z____"__
12.858 K Factor == 5.60
0.0
0.582
13.440
0.0
1.251
14.691
0.0
2.542
17.233
0.0
3.768
1.687
120
0.0135
1.687
120
0.0490
1.687
120
0.1054
1.687
120
0.1847
1.687
120
0.2929
21.001
----.---"-"
0.0 10.000 13.474
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 10.000 0.135
._-_._.._._,_..--,_._-_._--_.---~-~._~-"-_..._---
0.0 12.500 13.609
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 12.500 0.613
_____.v_.___._.___._o.__,__.____
0.0 12.500 14.222
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 12.500 1.318
0.0 14.500 15.540
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 14.500 2.678
1T 10.044 3.500 18.218
0.0 10.044 0.0
0.0 13.544 3.967
Vel = 5.75
K Factor == 5.60
Vel == 8.70
. ---..----.
K Factor == 5.60
Vel = 11.78
K Factor == 5.60
Vel == 15.12
K Factor == 22.98
K Factor == 5.60
Vel == 2.95
._--_.--~--_.-._-.._-_.._-_.._--_._----
K Factor = 5.60
Vel == 5.92
K Factor == 5.60
Vel = 8.95
K Factor = 5.60
Vel == 12.12
--.-----,------.-.----------.-----
K Factor = 5.60
Vel == 15.55
K Factor = 23.00
Vel = 9.27
108.31
0.0
__.__:LQ~~_______ 22.J"~~_
66 105.32 2.154 0.0 14.000 21.001
to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0
72 105.32 0.0846 0.0 14.000 1.184
'--'---
72 108.31 2.154 11 4.278 35.000 22.185
to 120 1J 10.39 14.668 0.0
_?~__~:~ 0.31"~_L__ 0.0 49.668 15~549 _
73 0.0 3.26 11 6.72 28.000 37.734
to 120 0.0 6.720 0.0
74__~..:63 ~16 _.__.~~.720.__1.445______...
74 0.0 3.26 0.0 90.000 39.179
to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0
75 ._~13.63_~.0416___~~~:000.___. 3.745
75 0.0 3.26 11 6.72 14.000 42.924
to 120 1J 17.471 24.191 12.993
TEE 213.63 0.0416 0.0 38.191 1.589
Vel = 18.81
._-~------,,~,_...-
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
Vel = 8.21
Vel = 8.21
Vel = 8.21
. ~alculations - Standard
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT Page 7
REMOTE 2 Date
Hyd. Os Dis. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt
Ref. "e" or Ftng's Pe Pv .",,,ft***' Notes **..*...
Point Qt PfJUL Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn
-_.._--~~---_.__.. ---_.~-- ~--~---
TEE 0.0 4.26 11 9.217 10.000 57.506
to 120 0.0 9.217 0.0
BAS 213.63 0.0113 0.0 19.217 0.217 Vel = 4.81
~~
BAS 0.0 4.26 1G 2.633 1.000 57.723
to 120 18 15.8 18.433 3.000 .. Fixed los8 = 3
SPG 213.63 0.0113 0.0 19.433 0.220 Vel = 4.81
-~-'- ---'._~'----~
SPG 0.0 6.16 21 14.346 150.000 60.943
to 140 1G 4.304 68.860 0.0
CITY 213.63 0.0014 1J 35.864 218.860 0.308 Vel = 2.30
_._,~------- ,--,,'-"
100.00 Qs= 100.00
------ 313.63 61.251 K Factor = 40.07
--~---~--"--_.~._--_.._-~-----~~_.__...__...
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 3
Page 1
Date
Hydraulic Desian Information Sheet
Name - VILLAGE COMMERCE BUILDING
Location - PARK NICOLLET AVE, PRIOR LAKE, MN.
Building - 1ST FLOOR
Contractor - INTERNATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
Calculated By - DOUG CARLSON
Construction: ( ) Combustible (X) Non-Combustible
Occupancy - OFFICES
Date - 11-02-06
System No. - 1
Contract No. -
Drawing No. - 1
Ceiling Height -
s
Y
S
T
E
M
(X) NFPA 13 (X) Lt. Haz.
( ) NFPA 231 ( ) NFPA 231C
Other
Specific Ruling
Ord.Haz.Gp. ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 3 () Ex.Haz.
( ) Figure Curve
Made By Date
sprinkie-r/Nozzle
Make RELIABLE
Model FIFR
Size 1/2
K-Factor 5.6
Temp.Rat.155
~ea of Sprinkler Operation - 1500
Density - .1
Area Per Sprinkler - 200
Elevation at Highest Outlet - 14
Hose Allowance - Inside
Rack Sprinkler Allowance
Hose Allowance - Outside - 100
System Type
(X) Wet
( ) Dry
( ) Deluge
( ) Preaction
( ) Other
D
E
S
I
G
N
Note
Calculation
Summary
Flow Required - 411.49 Press Required - 52.43
C-Factor Used: 120 Overhead 140
At CITY
Underground
W
A
T
E
R
Water Flow Test:
Date of Test - 2004
Time of Test
Static Press - 72
Residual Press - 64
Flow - 1220
Elevation
Tank or Reservoir:
Cap. -
Elev.-
Pump Data:
Rated Cap.-
@ Press
Elev.
Well
Proof Flow
S
U
P
P
L
Y
Location - 300' SOUTHWEST OF SITE
Source of Information - CITY WATER DEPT.
C
o
M
M
Commodity
Storage Ht.
Storage Method:
Location
Aisle W.
Palleti zed %
Rack
Class
Area
%
Solid Piled
S
T
o
R
A
G
E
----r-r-s i ng 1 e-"R-OW--
( ) Double Row
( ) Mult. Row
Conven. Pallet~~--r-'-f-uAil~Sto-rage ---r-)--Encap ~-_._---------_._--'--
Slave Pallet ( ) Solid Shelf ( ) Non
( ) Open Shelf
R
A
C
K
Flue--Spacrng----------"
Longitudinal
-Clearance: Stor"age-to--CeI ling ----- -~-------
Transverse
----
Horizontal Barriers Provided:
g
3
-g
iiT
...
\l
rS
iiI
i
~
.?
0.
J
n
:i
p
5
~
.......
z~
>0
~o
CD
C1I
~
g
iiT
.....
.....
.....
:E
s'
0.
=r
I\)
3
Z
:t:
c:
~
c
~
011
-...j
~ I\)
o 0
~ -
o~
8
a>
8
(1)
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
~
o
~
8
~
~
o
m ;0
w "'" CJ1 0)
o 000
-211
1:10
~
c en
-.,J (1)
o 0
~
n
......
en
CD
o
m
'tI
()
~
ooo~
I\) I\) ~ CD
I I I CD
:;0 :;0 en"
DlDlig>
a: a: C'j""O
c: c: 'TL~
CD CD _~
--CD"
"Tl"tlrn
ii~
rn@
c:
.. ~ ,.
~O)-.,J
~~I\)
0"'0"'0
G)~~
"'0
s:
;0
......
8
~
.....
o
~
I\)
o
....
w
o
....
~
....
~
~O::J:::J:OOO
...WOOI\)I\)....
CiJ'.lnfD",
~en(l)(I)enenm
s:'iii C;>>'iii 'tii iD
CD (D'CD..9:S'S':i
<2. 3 3 0 3 3 g:
:J 0 ~ -'"'O"Tl :J
(I) c..~a 0"
3- rn:E
I\) rn
:J c:
a. i
....""'.... w
?l~g ~=~
i~~ ~~w
"'OG)S:,...."'OG)"'0
en "'0 u, en "'0 en
-s: "'O-S:-
s:
::uo
me:
~C/)
00
iTl3:
wo
m
en
G5
z
'T1
~
m
1J
;0
o
~
()
-l
~
m
at
..,
en
c:;
"C
-0
-<
o
c:
~
-
(')
.......
0"'0
!!l.!
(1)(1)
I\)
"",~re I Flow Summary - STANDARD
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 3
Page 3
Date
Node
No.
Elevation K-Fact
pt Pn Flow Density Area Press
_ Actul!L.-__________ Actual __~______________ Reg~__"
----------_.__..,----~._--~_.~..__.
21
23
24
26
27
28
30
31
32
33
34
38
37
38
39
22
25
29
41
35
40
42
TEE
BAS
SPG
CITY
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.8
5.8
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
15.77
18.15
17.73
13.91
15.56
16.93
12.76
12.91
13.38
14.63
16.82
17.1
18.77
19.53
24.37
17.87
18.04
19.41
27.6
28.72
30.45
35.46
47.93
48.37
51.81
52.43
oa
na
na
ns
na
ns
os
ns
ns
ne
ne
na
na
na
na
ns
na
ns
ns
n8
na
oa
na
ns
na
os
22.24 .1 200 7.0
22.5 .1 200 7.0
23.58 .1 200 7.0
20.89 .1 200 7,0
22.09 .1 200 7.0
23.05 .1 200 7.0
20.0 .1 200 7.0
20.12 .1 200 7.0
20.48 .1 200 7.0
21.42 .1 200 7.0
22.96 .1 200 7.0
23.15 .1 200 7.0
24.26 .1 200 7.0
24.75 .1 200 7.0
100.0
The maximum velocity is 18.33 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 40 and 42
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
....alculations - Standard
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT
REMOTE 3
Page 4
Date
Hyd.
Ref.
Point
Qa
Dia.
Fitting
or
Eqv. Ln.
Pipe
Ftng's
Total
Pt
Pe
Pf
pt
Pv
Pn
Notes .............
"C"
Qt
Pf/UL
_*.__fr"''''
22.24 1.104
120
22.24 0.1235
--,,----
0.0
22.24
~-~.__._.
23 22.50
to
24
24
to
25
21
to
22
26
to
27
---
27
to
28
28
to
29
22.5
23.58
46.08
0.0
46.08
20.89
20.89
22.09
42.98
23.04
1E 2.565 8.000 15.772
1T 6.413 8.978 0.0
0.0 16.978 2.096
17.868
0.0 12.500 16.150
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 12.500 1.577
-------~
0.0 2.500 17.727
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 2.500 0.313
.- -- --- - -~
K Factor::: 5.60
Vel = 7.45
K Factor = 5.26
K Factor = 5.60
1.104
120
0.1262
1.452
120
0.1252
1.104
120
0.1099
1.452
120
0.1100
1.452
120
0.2434
Vel = 7.54
K Factor = 5.60
66.02
0.0
66.02
30 20.00 1.687 0.0 12.000
to 120 0.0 0.0
~__~9.0 0.0129 ____ 0.0 12.000
31 20.12 1.687 0.0 10.000
to 120 0.0 0.0
32 40.12 0.0466 0.0 10.000
-~-~,--
32 20.48 1.687 0.0 12.500
to 120 0.0 0.0
_33 __ 60.6__(!.100~_____Q.9_____~..~90 ___
33 21.42 1.687 0.0 12.500
to 120 0.0 0.0
34 ___ 82.02 0.1751 0.0 12.500
34 22.96 1.687 1T 10.044 33.000
to 120 0.0 10.044
~_5____104.9L 0.2765 0.0 43.044
0.0
104.98
36 23.15 1.104 1E 2.565
~ 120 QO
-1L_~~L_.J!:.133~_______9..&.
37 24.26 1.687 0.0
to 120 0.0
_~__~!.41 0.0635___.JlO__
38 24.75 1.687 0.0
to 120 0.0
39 72.16 0.1382 0.0
Vel::: 8.93
18.040
----.-.-----
0.0 15.000 13.911
QO QO QO
0.0 15.000 1.649
.--------_..
0.0 12.500 15.560
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 12.500 1.375
7.686 2.500 16.935
0,0 7.686 0.0
0.0 10.186 2.479
--_._-~---,-_._-,_.
K Factor::: 10.85
K Factor = 5.60
Vel = 7.00
K Factor = 5.60
1T
Vel::: 8.33
K Factor = 5.60
Vel::: 12.79
K Factor::: 14.98
- - -
K Factor = 5.60
19.414
12.755
0.0
0.155
12.910
0.0
0.466
13.376
0.0
1.251 Vel = 8.70
--------- ------- - -~-~~ -~_._--
14.627 K Factor = 5.60
0.0
2.189
16.816
0.0
11.901 Vel::: 15.07
._-~,--~---
Vel = 2.87
K Factor::: 5.60
Vel = 5.76
K Factor = 5.60
Vel = 11.77
.~--~--........----~
K Factor:;:: 5.60
28.717
10.000 17.096
2.565 0.0
_____12..565 _ _J~67~_____ _____....Y~'-=-?76 ___
12.000 18.768 K Factor:::: 5.60
0.0 0.0
12.Q_00 __ 0.7~________.vel= 6.81
35.000 19.530 K Factor = 5.60
0.0 0.0
35.000 4.837
K Factor = 19.59
-'~ -
K Factor = 5.60
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
Vel = 10.36
...1 Calculations ~ Standard
CUSTOM DESIGN FIRE PROTECT Page 5
REMOTE 3 Date
Hyd. as Dis. Fitting Pipe pt pt
Ftng's Pe Pv _."',***1lr Notes ****11'*
Ref. "C" or
Point at PflUL Eqv. Ln. Totsl Pf Pn
._...~________.__.._-------_w_----_.
39
to
40
0.0
1.687
120
0.1382
1T 10.044
0.0
0.0
34.000
10.044
44.044
24.367
0.0
6.086
Vel = 10.36
72.16
0.0
~._.~16_-_-
22 22.24 1.687
to 120
25 22.24 0.0156
25 46.08 1.687
to 120
29 68.32 0.1249
.-------
29 66.02 2.154 11
to 120 1J
41 134.34 0.1327
41 0.0 2.635
to 120
35 134.34 0.0497
35 104.99 2,635
to 120
40 239,33 0.1447
40 72.16 2,635
to 120
42 311.49 0.2357
42 0.0 3.26
to 120
TEE 311.49 0.0836
TEE 0.0 4,26
to 120
BAS 311.49 0.0227
BAS 0.0 4.26
to 120
SPG 311.49 0,0227
----_._-~-
SPG 0,0 6.16
to 140
CITY 311.49 0.0028
100,00
411,49
_____~Q.45~__~___KF~ctor= 13.08 __.___
.---------.
0.0 11.000 17,868
0,0 0.0 0.0
0.0 11.000.~_O,17~__._.__Y~!= 3,19
0.0 11.000 18.040
0,0 0.0 0.0
0.0-11:Q.~___. 1.37.L_____yel = _. 9.81..______
4.276 47.000 19.414
10.39 14.666 0.0
0:L_~.6~_.8.18~__._______ Vel = 11.8=L-_~
21 6.237 6.000 27,599
0.0 16.474 0.0
0.0 22.474 1.116
-----~-
0.0 12.000 28.717
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 12.000 1.736
11 8.237 13.000 30.453
0.0 6.237 0.0
0.0 21.237 5.005 Vel = 18.33
.._.......-----..----~--_._----_.
1\ 6.72 70.000 35,458
0.0 6.720 6.063
0.0 76.720 6.414
--"-~--_.
11 9.217 10.000 47.935
0.0 9.217 0.0
0.0 19.217 0.436
1G 2.633 1.000 48.371
1B 15.8 18.433 3.000
._____..____g~o 19.433 0.442
21 14.346 150.000 51.813
1G 4.304 68,860 0.0
_J~_._~.~~~.860 __ 0.620
Vel = 7.90
Vel = 14.08
Vel;:: 11.97
Vel = 7.01
· Fixed loss = 3
Vel = 7.01
52.433
Vel =: 3.35
aa = 100,00
K Factor = 56.83
Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company, lne
Braun lntertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
4
Date: November 03, 2006
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville. MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
-X- For your records
For review
Information Sent
Site Grading - Densities
Reference Numbers
Tests 7 through 12
Com m entslC la ri fication
Tests Taken 1O!l6/06 & 10125/06
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins, City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz. Greystone Construction Company. Inc
Brian Salter, LS Engineers
Andy Krenik, Tushie Montgomery & Associates.lnc.
I Information Sent
Site Grading - Densities (1 )
Site Grading - Densities ( 1 )
Site Grading - Densities (I)
Site Grading - Densities ( I)
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan P. Kolle
952-469-3644
Nev.:-: ()()-/
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
'"
~
t--
N
---
o
......
4l
....
~
~
1::
Q
Q.
~
N
N
Q\
!IN
~c::l
E-<~
=E-<
.S 00-
't<
CU"CI
C.o
e-=
0....
u ~
"CI~
-....
~! ~
~E-<
-0 l:!
tilE 0--
-0",\0
8 '0 \0
r/l~
] .f' ~
~ sg ~"'
'" III "
ci50
E
III
8
2 ~
t; 9 0
~ ~
s::
::l
'"
....
co
-;:;
-00
o r'l
::E ;;
....
III
III ><
~ I:
::E f-<
0-
M
"0
'"
o
~
;>-.
gfE
._ ;:::l
'0 0
::::U
~Cd
0'0
u '"
.... 0
~0~;Z;
"'S...~
~S~O~
..,.80.;.:
.;; 9 ~ .~ .c:ti
~on ooZ....l
.09 ~ ~ S
10 ....l :::: !<l 'C
p., co :> P-,dl...
u
.s
,::,
a
0-
s
o
U
l:
.g-g
u 0
2~
'tn=
c '"
o..c::
U ~
~ao<u
.... o~o 8-
=t>lZlMO
.!!~o.~~
Utl~~~
---.
~
~ ~.g
~ 08 ~
~~ e-
o
u
o
8 "5
'0 15 0 0
'2 ex:: cx:: ex::
-uggg
~ ~ ~ ~
"'t:) C1) C1) Q)
v"'g~-g
~<C<C<C
9
E
~ e
05 ~
.E
00
t: t:
]]
000
t: t: t:
III III III
.D .D .D
000
ex:: ex:: ex::
ci' ci' ci'
000
'" '" '"
.... .... ....
III III III
-0 -0 -0
c c c
<C<C<C
..,...,...,...,...,...,.
lI')V)lI')V)lI')V)
000000
M r'l r'l M M r'l
"'''''''NNN
C1)~
.D
I:
"'"
-5
p..
III
o
NNNNNN
.....-l_____
~~
o <1J
::E~
tn ~~t
~-
f-<f-<f-<f-<f-<f-<
000000
E';;
~~
8~
<C<C<C<C<C<C
lI') lI') II) lI') lI') lI')
0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- 0--
s::
Q) .g
.~ u
tdCd~
03 e ~
ex:: 0
u
C13
0-3>_0......
~o::=::
~ "00
"'" s:::
.Eo
<1J l:!
g ~
ii: '0
.5~
t--\Ot--oo\Ot--
0--0--0--0--0--0--
~~::
- - -
~oot--\Ooot--t--
.... C
<1J III
td E
~8
<:;:;'000000
u '" r-: r-: '" 00 00
-3>
.....€<:;:;'
~ cg g.
;;>0""-
ooo~~o
d~oO"""ooo\
N--N--
------
c
.~
'"
's
~ ~
~ (,)
-"'-
~..><:
6~
f-<"'-
OIIl
'"
s::
l!l 'E
Sl ~
1d~
VI CJ Ou
s'E&
.~ 8. ~
(,) "'-0
!-8 -5 '0
&.~ .~
'" ;... '"
.s P...s
.~ 8 -~
;., (,) ;.,
o..oc..
E s:: E
000
(,) -0 (,)
!J !J !J
"3"3'3
'" '" '"
~ e e
- - -
'" '" '"
" " "
..f-<f-<f-<
- N ~ II II II
--~<IIlU
8fi")("'I")MMMM
000000
~~~~~~~
0-
t--
M
on
on
"'\0"'''''''\0
000000
~~~~~~;n
oooooo~
----..--
~
ti
.2:l.....
~o
ti
~t--ooo--~
\0
C
Oc
~~t--
...J"-"~
E.,f' -
S 5
.~ 0
::E
e '#-
::l l:!
8E..f
'a'~
o~
s:::
o
.~ ::E
S ~
~ lZl
U
9 M
o
'0 d..
lZl
s:::
o
o..g 00000"\0"10\00
~o--o--o--o--o--o--
III
P3
c s:: s:: s:: s:: ....
o 000 0 III
Q) .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ ~
u>>>>>o
s::: III III III 0 <1J 0
l:!iilP3P3iilP3-
~aaaaal-4
~.9.9.9.9.98
s::....................c;::
0-0-0-0-0-0-0
.~ 1!1!1!1!1! III
~VJrnf/l(/'JC/}..s::
Q) "2 02 "2 02 "2 .~
P3~~~~~J3
s::
.Sl
a
'':
u
'"
<1J
o
s:::
o
.~
u
o
....l
on o:t
00 onl"'i
'\ONN1OO
lI') I \0 .
~OO<C~<C
iU (U ~ (1J ::J ~
.S .S .S .S .S .S
:a:a:a:a:a;:g
SS8S8c:s
ta =a-;::a =a:;
~~~~~~
.... .... .... .... .... ....
.9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9
.... .... '""' '""' .... ....
~ E E -E E ~
~~~~~~
s::::-_- -=
o~........~....~
.~ -a -a -a -a -a -a
0222222
....luu(,)uuu
] EEiL~gg
......lZllZllZllZllZllZl
9
tir-oo~~::~
<1J
f-<
J
~
C
Gl
E
::J
U
.s::;0
a.u
lJlGlco
O=:;O
'GlO
- > N
:!20.....
~ 5.N
.!!! g.u
Z_O
.....
o
III
~
"'"
-0
~
III
Z
.J::
p..
<1J
'"
o
-.
~
III
.~
o
....
"'"
-0
a
-a
O'S
III
-0
!;::
s:::
o
U
on
l"'i
..;
III
>
BRAUN"W
INTERTEC
~. If/'S/DC,
.......-,
e_
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
City of
/11"50/4 v { /
Ii/tv i {:k,~/~_
/{?foA 4 ~ ...,-; ~f
/
- rY' :r ~ ---..:..-
~hi)vJ
Special lDspedor DaDy Report
,t;?; uy La b./
Page
1
of
I
\
Date of This Report: II (10 ~ (.."
Project No.: /5/... - 0:5 -'D~f{\{,A
lv. -- ofl <----: oJv' {p. k ~
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
30"
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
a Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
a5l Masonry
o Welding
o BoI'
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
Tendon Placement 0 Other
Yes 0 (Listed Below) No
, I?, ./,} /J / :\
~ 1<-': /'(X?y ~-C:JI-' <2 -2.~)
~-~ h d
Rebar Placement
Concrete Placement
Did the architect or e
\
Description and location of work completed: vA"",", vY.,~l /1bJlJu"v/
~' -.. /
" (8.2. ' x5-/~ :;....y ,/ ") C, . /f,,"'t..... S"
I
dl;o.r <.
2'1 s v-"'v+
g r (l~e !Ju",j ~"I., () "r..----r
2# 5
List tests performed:
I
I
I .
I
! :
!
Are there any-discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 N(N)Cl {g7
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 ~
If yes. see attached Summary Sheet.
I
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
fPlicabfe_~ship provisi e UBC. except as noted above. J,
$igned: \ /~~ ~ Date: II //i/!(p
. c__u/.. I / I /
Print ~/Name: \....,/,f/J ""'- L. (...JW$) 1.0. Number:
(white copy to Braun Intenec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
fT\sfh:<:insp.4 1125195
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company. Inc
Braun Intertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
6
Date: November 10,2006
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
~ For your records
For review
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Reference Numbers
Set 7
Com ments/Clarification
Report Dated 10/9/06
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests ( 1 )
Concrete Tests ( 1 )
Concrete Tests (1)
Concrete Tests (])
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins. City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz. Greystone Construction Company, lnc
Brian Salfer. LS Engineers
Andy Krenik. Tushie Montgomery & Associates.lnc.
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan P. Kolle
952-469-3644
Ne!'_ 8(, IU
. Providing engineering and environmental solulions sll1ce 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/8/06
Work Order: 6016571
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee, MN 55379
Project:
BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (OF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Gridline 7.3 to 8.4 - A
Sample LocationlNotes: cylinders were cast by client, no information given
7
10/9/06
1l:31 am
10/11/06
01/4
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
1
1
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
7-1 2 5 7 61040 4.00 12.57 4,860 D N D2
7-2 2 26 28 86710 4.00 12.57 6,900 D N El
7-3 2 26 28 86580 4.00 12.57 6,890 C N E1
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
E1
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~ []
ABC 0 E
CaN} Cone Cone Shear Columnar
8. &
Split Shear
J~i:::;~1iljJ
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company. Inc
Braun [ntertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
5
Date: November 08, 2006
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
Cit)' of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
~ For your records
For review
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Site Grading - Densities
Reference Numbers
Set Numbers 1 through 6
Test Numbers 7 through [2
Com ments/Clarification
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests ( I). Site Grading - Densities ( 1 )
Concrete Tests (1). Site Grading - Densities ( I )
Concrete Tests ( 1). Site Grading - Densities ( I )
Concrete Tests (I). Site Grading - Densities ( I)
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins. City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz. Greystone Construction Company. Inc
Brian Salfer. LS Engineers
Andy Krenik. Tushie Montgomery & Associates,lnc.
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan K Graves
952-469-3644
Nev. 86D-f
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6015970
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,MN 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. COF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Gridline D(2 to 3)
Sample Location/Notes: Cylinders cast by the client no infonnation given
I
10/3/06
3:04 pm
10/4/06
3
1.0
70
75
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
222
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
1-01 1 6 7 60860 4.00 12.57 4,840 C N D2
1-02 1 27 28 71140 4.00 12.57 5,660 D N El
1-03 1 27 28 80910 4.00 12.57 6,440 C N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
EI
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~QJ0B[]]
ABC D E
Corte Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Spirt Shear
~Nti~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6015971
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (OF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline A - 4,5, and 6
Sample Location/Notes: Cylinders cast by the client no information given
2
10/3/06
3 :07 pm
10/4/06
3
2.0
70
75
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
225
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code( s)
2-01 1 6 7 53560 4.00 12.57 4,260 D N D2
2-02 I 27 28 80200 4.00 12.57 6,380 D N El
2-03 1 27 28 71680 4.00 12.57 5,700 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
El
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~0[][]]
ABC D E
Corle Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Split Shear
l}~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6016090
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,MN 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. eF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (OF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline D - 2 and 3
Sample LocationINotes: Cylinders were cast by client no information given
3
10/4/06
3:28 pm
10/5/06
3
2.0
70
65
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
225
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
3-01 1 6 7 51840 4.00 12.57 4,130 D N D2
3-02 1 27 28 88860 4.00 12.57 7,070 D N El
3-03 1 27 28 77390 4.00 12.57 6,160 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, SulfUr Caps
Break Remarks: D2
El
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[]~[][]]
ABC D E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Cofumner
& &
Spirt Shear
~;~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6016092
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,MN 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing
Sample LocationINotes: Cylinders cast by client no information given
4
10/4/06
3:32 pm
10/5/06
5
2.0
71
65
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
o
Not Given
2
Anderson, Robert D
Sample No.
4-01
4-02
Field
Cure
(days)
1
1
Lab
Cure
(days)
27
27
Test
Age
(days)
28
28
Compression Test Results
Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Load Diameter Area
(pounds) (in.) (sq. in.)
93220 4.00 12.57
82130 4.00 12.57
Strength
(psi)
7,420
6,540
Fracture
Type
C
D
Capping
Method *
N
N
Remarks
Code(s)
El
E1
Break Remarks: El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~00[]]
ABC D E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Split Shear
Jk1:J~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6016315
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,MN 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, ~
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing, Elevator / Stairwell footings
Sample LocationINotes: Cylinders cast by client no information given
5
10/6/06
1 :46 pm
10/9/06
01/4
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
o
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code( s)
5-01 3 4 7 49310 4.00 12.57 3,920 D N D2
5-02 3 25 28 73800 4.00 12.57 5,870 D N El
5-03 3 25 28 82910 4.00 12.57 6,600 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
El
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~00[]]
ABC D E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Split Shear
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/7/06
Work Order: 6016317
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. eF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline B - 3,4, and 5
Sample Location/Notes: Cylinders cast by client no information given
6
10/6/06
1 :50 pm
10/9/06
01/4
0.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
1
Not Given
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
6-01 3 4 7 58060 4.00 12.57 4,620 D N D2
6-02 3 25 28 86400 4.00 12.57 6,880 C N El
6-03 3 25 28 79620 4.00 12.57 6,340 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
El
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~Q;J0B[]]
ABC D E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Split Shear
#~;~
\0
o
--
r-
N
--
o
c;
....
01
~
1:
Cl
=-
..
~
M
M
0\
",M
'E~
E-<~
CE-<
.51 rn
't<
['g
S..c
0....
U <II
"O~
-....
.~ ~
L";I;.E-<
Z
:t
C
III
II
u
w
.....
~
W
.....
Z
~.f' ~
"0 '" 00
!ij5"-'1
ti)0
E
~ ~
l:l 8 ~
~ ~
~
m
]~'"
"0 '" \0
!a .0 \0
Vi~
.,
"0 0
o ("')
~ ;;
....
Q)
~~
~ ~
<t:
\0
If)
~
~
"0
....,
.~~
fj
j:l.,t:Q
0-
M
-g
o
cG
OJ) 0
.5 3
"0 0
.- u
&io'<l
Q)"O
u 0:1
~~;z:
E_~
E2
80jf
Q) .~cd
OJ);Z: .....l
~ ~.9
>~~
<.)
..s
~
0-
E
o
U
t:
.~]
<.) 0
2cG
t:i::::
t:0:I ~
0"'<::
U <.)
o ~ 0"
g~ 8 0
~tit/J~ ~
.~ ~o.~7d
ocs:;a~
000000
!ij 15 15 15 15 15 15
.<:) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
]~~~~~~
u l':r s:: s:: s:: s:: l:r
~~~~~~~
~~.s~~~~
ii:~~~~~~
,.....,
e
~ ~ Q
'5 Q .s:!
~ "2 ~
~~ e
o
u
8
E
~ e
.... ::l
a:l l:l
'"
,s
~~~~~~
V)1.t')V)V)V)V)
000000
MMMMMM
NNNNNN
Q)~
.g-s
.... c..
p... Q)
o
C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l
-............... ..-
..g>:
o Q)
~~
~~
E-
E-E-E-E-E-E-
OOOQCQ
~~
~~
8~
<t:<t:<t:<t:<t:<t:
IF) 1.0 to IF) IF) to
0"\0"\0\0\0\0\
l::
tU .g
> U ,.....,
.~ [~
~g~
u
~'t?
0":'_0_
- --
- -
Q) Q)
~ B
is: "a
..s~
t'--\Ot-oo\Ot-
0\ 0'. 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
8.f'
o:l '"
i5::: l::
.so
C'l0-
- - -
- -
'$.,oot-\Doot-r-
.... E
~ E
~8
QOOOOOO
u~~r----:o\oOoO
.e
- .f'Q
Q) '" U
~e.e
o
000000
cir--: oci_oO 0\
~::::::~::::
c:
.~
s
~ ~
E-< u
-'"
~~
i5~
II II
E-<",
O"'l
'"
c:
g .~
-.g ~
en ~'(3
g 'u 8-
.~ 8.:;;
" '" ."
'5 :€ .~
8. ?; .~
'" ;... ..
;s Q.;S
.~ g .~
;...";...
c..oc..
e c: e
000
u." u
~ ~ ~
::;::;::;
'" '" '"
e ~ e
- -
'" '" '"
Q) Q) Q)
..E-<E-E-
0_-C'l_i';>1I II II
~<"'lU
8MMMMMM
000000
~~d.~~~~
0\
r-
M
If)
If)
\C \0 \0 \0 \D \0
000000
~\o\O\O\O~;n
o~~~~~~
............... -........
-
'"
Q)<+--
Jlo
-
'"
~r-ooO\
\0
~
OQ
.0 u
o:l .e r-
>oJ "<i
~.~ -
.5 ~
td
~
8 ~ _
~ B .,f
'~'5 ..-
O~
l::
.s:!
~ ~
... <:I)
.~ ~
~ <:I)
o
8 8
'0 P..
<:I)
l::
.s:!
~~~~~~~
Q)
~
l:: l:: l:: l:: l:: _
.9 .9 .9 .9 .9 ,~
Q)t;j~~~tt1-
u>>>>>o
QVQ)lI)Q)Q)O
~~~~~~
cB .... .... 1-0 .... ....
~gggggg
Q1i:~1i:1i:~<;::
.s:! "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0
~~~~].sQ)
;>- tn U) en tI) "'. ~
Q) .2 '2 '2 .2 .2a
~ii:ii:ii:ii:ii:...
Q
.s:!
.&
....
u
'"
Q)
o
Q
.g
o:l
u
o
>oJ
'" ~
00 ",!M
I\ONN1OO
V) I I ~
a:i00<t:a:l<t:
Q) tU tU tU lU 0
.s .s .s .s .S .s
~~~~~~
CU5 tJ tJ tJ tJ
lil~lil~lillil
~~~~~~
.... .... .... .... .... ....
.g .g .~ .g .g .g
Go) a.J Q) Q) Q) lU
:S]]:5:S:5
c= d
. 51 ii: ii:
'iillillil
~ a a
>oJ u u
'fj E E
E- en <:I)
ii:ii:ii:ii:
lillillillil
.... .... .... ::s
~fiBu
222 2
~rnt5{;J
8
t;r---OQO\O-N
Q)
E-
t
~
C
al
E
:::l
tJ
.co
0."0
3lalw
050
:~~
310,,-
~ 5.N
.~ g. ti
2_0
.....
o
Q)
bll
o:l
~
"0
~
Q)
Z
...<::
c..
~
o
.....
~
.~
....
c..
o
....
p...
"0
!ij
]
E
~
...
Q
o
U
V>
N
..;
Q)
>
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Braun lntcrtec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
7
Date: November 15,2006
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
Cit}' of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
~ For your records
For review
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Reference Numbers
Set Number 8
Com m ents/Clarification
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins. City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz, Greystone Construction Company, fnc
Brian Salter, LS Engineers
Andy Krcnik. Tushie Montgomery & Associates.Inc.
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests ( I )
Concrete Tests ( I )
Concrete Tests ( I )
Concrete Tests ( I )
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan K Graves
952-469-3644
Un'. Nfl IN
. Providing engineering and environmental so/ulions since N57
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 11/14/06
Work Order: 6016573
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (iii.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline A - 8.4, 9.2, and 9.7
Sample LocationINotes: cylinders were cast by client, no information given
8
10/11/06
11:37 am
10/11/06
5
0.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
1
1
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s)
8-1 0 7 7 69110 4.00 12.57 5,500 B N D2
8-2 0 28 28 90820 4.00 12.57 7,230 D N El
8-3 0 28 28 92960 4.00 12.57 7,400 D N El
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
Break Remarks: D2
El
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~ 0[]]
ABC D E
Cone Cone Cone Shear CokImar
& &
Split Shear
~e~
10s Nietfeld
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company. Inc
Braun Intertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
1
-,
Date: October 30, 2006
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
~ For your approval
~ As rcquested
--X- For your records
For rev iew
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Special Inspections
Reference Numbers
Set Number 8
Report dated 10/2/06
Comments/Cia rification
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins. City of Prior Lake
Gordic Schmitz. Greystonc Construction Company. lnc
Brian Saller, LS Engineers
Andy Krcnik, Tushie Montgomcry & Associates.lnc.
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests (I), Special Inspections (I)
Concrete Tests (1), Special Inspections (I)
Concrete Tests ( 1 ). Special Inspections ( I )
Concrete Tests (1). Special Inspections (1)
Scnt By:
Phone:
Susan K Graves
952-469-3644
Uel'."'" 60-1
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 10/27/06
Work Order: 6016573
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,MN 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (OF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline A - 8.4, 9.2, and 9.7
Sample Location/Notes: cylinders were cast by client, no information given
8
10/11/06
11:37 am
10/11/06
5
0.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
1
1
3
Anderson, Robert D
Sample No.
8-1
Field
Cure
( days)
o
Lab
Cure
(days)
7
Test
Age
(days)
7
Compression Test Results
Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Load Diameter Area
(pounds) (in.) (sq. in.)
69110 4.00 12.57
Strength
(psi)
5,500
Fracture
Type
B
Capping
Method *
N
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
Break Remarks: D2
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~ [][]]
ABC 0 E
Cml& Cone Cone SOOlilr Coluror.
&. &.
Spltt Shear
BRAUN~
INTERTEC
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Special Inspector Daily Report
<,,<,"7 / A
City of //j? /0 e- '-/+~
,
! of I
Page
0/
~/?7/.?7~-c-:-~ Pt_nt":.
Date of This Report: /0 / Z- /00
8 t. I
Project No.: -.1.75 - b~1..{5~^
~70~
A ' / ud..<:-
~
Client Project No.:
Temperature: (5)'='
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry ~barPlacement [J/Foundation~ ~i("'S
o Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other
Did the architect or engineer authodze changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Description and location of work comPletedL/~/Ved Ci-c::>J' Je;: ~~I ~ J lSH)
:sJ/7dS <<J./1/L().,~'J- :7;;-/.7"-./ 4"t''"-tf:J0 ~ s,y'j?Zr'(
~ ~ do~ fmd<:5~ J./ ~ s'~:/I1d;.~ lAJctLl !/1fS
=-t- U . / -----a- '
() bseYJ/~ y- /J (jet /
.J ~i/l_~
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
wPeriodic
,.L
ha V-6
~~
~"--e..."" (" ~ ,
<;.
(//V ~ ~
f I
O'<~Vt"':
<5"0)"6'0 c5i/5
'lA .reV:09JS
List tests performed: ~/2 P a Uj e..-v-
c-o--?s/s. .~ I- v, ;,c::;e_
--1- I '/
7:eS ,pJ.~
.
Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
/...
No [g--
No~
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and
applicoble woe ship provisions '1 the ~ClUBC, except as noted above. ,; .' I
Signe ' Y Lfl..;O.I....J."'.~ Date: Ie? 2-1 () ./
E ---. rr . v
......... ' ,
Print Full Name: '- h~ e... ~ LD. Number:
/LI ;J
(White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
frm\specinspA 1/25/95
/ (7.../1 .5"""
P/lor z.'rz~)YI~~r--
J
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 6xl2 Cylinder
Report Date: 1/10/07
Work Order: 7000191
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project:
BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
4729 Park Nicollet Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location:
9
12/29/06
8: 10 am
1/8/07
5
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Tmck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3500
Aggregate Industries
1 Not Required
3500
o
o
3
Client
Building Interior, Slab on Deck, 2nd floor; North End
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. (days) (days) ( days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
9-01 10 I 11 94280 6.00 28.27 3,330 C
Capping
Method *
N
Remarks
Code( s )
Bl
Break Remarks: B 1
* Capping Method: N = ASTM CI231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical
age-strength relationship.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~0[][]]
ABC D E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar
&. &.
Split Shear
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company, Ine
Braun Intertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
III
Date: January 26, 2007
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
SUite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
Phone: 9524474230
Fax: 9524474245
Re: Village Commerce Building, 4729 Park NicoIlet Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
~ For your records
For review
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Reference Numbers
Set 9
Commen ts/Clarification
Report Dated 1/10107
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins, City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz, Greystone Construction Company, [nc
Brian Salter, LS Engineers
Andy Krenik, Tushie Montgomery & Associates,lnc.
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests ( 1 )
Concrete Tests ( ] )
Concrete Tests (1)
Concrete Tests ( I )
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan P. Kolle
952-469-3644
Hev. N,6D../
. Praviding engineering and environmental solutions since /957
Pennit #
Permit Date
COMcheck Software Version 3.2.1
Envelope Compliance Certificate
Minnesota Commercial Code
Report Date: 07/31/06 .
Data filename: Z:\Prior Lake Office - 206115A\Documents\Energy Calcs\Village Commerce.cck
Section 1: Project Information
Project Title: Village Commerce Building
Construction Site:
Prior Lake, MN
Owner/Agent:
Dan O'Keefe
Village Commerce Building, LLC
14093 Commerce Avenue NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Designer/Contractor:
Andrew Krenik
Tushie Montgomery Architects
7645 lyndale Avenue S
Richfield, MN 55423
612-861-9636
Section 2: General Information
Building Location (for weather data):
Climate Zone:
Heating Degree Days (base 65 degrees F):
Cooling Degree Days (base 65 degrees F):
Projeet Type:
Vertical Glazing / Wall Area Pet.:
Scott, Minnesota
15
8499
695
New Construction
39%
Bulldlna Tvoe
Offices: 1 0,001-25,000 ft2
Floor Area
22364
Section 3: Requirements Checklist
Envelope PASSES DeSign 30'0 better than CODe
Climate-Specific Requirements:
Component Name/Description Gross Area Cavity Cont. Proposed Budget
or R-Value R-Value U-Factor U-Factor
Perimeter
Roof: Non-Wood JoistIRafterfTruss 11575 0.0 25.0 0.039 0.045
West Elevation - Stud: Metal Frame, 16" O.c. 5816 19.0 0.0 0.114 0.068
Curtain Wall: Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane with 2248 0.330 0.520
Low-E, Tinted, SHGC 0.39
Windows: Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane with 810 0.330 0.520
Low-E, Tinted, SHGC 0.39
West Elevation - Masonry: CMU <=8" with Integral Insulation, 698 13.0 0.0 0.123 0.068
Furring: Metal
Narth Elevation - Stud: Metal Frame, 16" O.c. 1149 19.0 0.0 0.114 0.068
Windows: Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane with 171 0.330 0.520
Low-E, Tinted, SHGC 0.39
North Elevation - Masonry: CMU <=8" with Integral Insulation, 108 13.0 0.0 0.123 0.068
Furring: Metal
East Elevation - Masonry: CMU <=8" with Integral Insulation, 639 13.0 0.0 0.123 0.068
Furring: Metal
Village Commerce Building Page 1 of 2
"""J
Windows; Metal Frame with Thermal Break;Double Pane with
Low-E, Tinted, SHGC 0.39
Metal Door. Solid
East Elevation - Stud; Metal Frame, 16" o.c.
Curtain Wall: Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane with
Low-E, Tinted, SHGC 0.39
Windows: Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane with
Low-E, Tinted, SHGC 0.39
South Elevation - Masonry: CMU <=8" with Integral Insulation,
Furring: Metal
Metal Door. Solid
South Elevation - Stud; Metal Frame, 16" o.c.
Curtain Wall: Metal Frame with Thermal Break;Double Pane with
Low-E, Tinted, SHGC 0.39
First Aoor Slab: Slab-On-Grade:Heated, Vertical 4 ft.
28
0.330 0.520
0.470 0.113
0.114 0.068
0.330 0.520
0.330 0.520
0.123 0.068
0.470 0.113
0.114 0.068
0.330 0.520
24
3774
1056
19.0
0.0
712
1057
13.0
0.0
24
1452
748
19.0
0.0
472
10.0
(a) Budget U-factors are used for software baseline calculations ONL Y, and are not code requirements.
Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements:
o 1. All joints and penetrations are caulked, gasketed, weather-stripped, or otherwise sealed.
o 2. Windows, doors, and skylights certified as meeting leakage requirements.
o 3. Component R-values & U-factors labeled as certified.
o 4. Insulation installed according to manufacturer's instructions, in substantial contact with the surface being insulated, and in a
manner that achieves the rated R-value without compressing the insulation.
o 5. Vapor retarder installed.
Section 4: Compliance Statement
Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans,
specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope system has been designed to
meet the Minnesota Commercial Code requirements in COM check Version 3.2.1 and to comply with the mandatory requirements in
the Requirements Checklist. "- J._ , I ~ A_
..JnjrewtKfl%\;l ~~ ~.z..O~
Principal Envelope Designer-Name Signature Date
Village Commerce Building
Page 2 af2
~,
THE DAMA CO.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
KEY LOCK BOX
AUTHORIZATION AND ORDER FORM
I PL:ASE READ
ORDERING INFORMATION:
1) This order must be signed with the signature of the
authorized Fire Department official on file with the DAMA CO.
2) The key box will be shipped to you without any keys and will
be locked in the open position. Contact your local Fire
Department for specific mounting requirements.
3) Please include 6.5% Minnesota sales tax and shipping charge.
4) Full payment must accompany order. Make check payable to THE DAM A CO.
5) Allow 1-2 weeks for delivery.
CUSTOMER INFORMATION
SHIP TO:
(DO NOT USE A P.O. BOX)
Company
Address
City/St/Zip
Attention of:
ORDEREDB~---DAT~3~0~--
Company G ~ 6 TQ-J6 LC^?-r. Co.
Address G"CO S. Mh~c:- (4) ~
City/St/Zip 0~Lo 176&1 fVlA.) 65;'11
. ct~
Name & Ph # Go(J...[)tV ~ t11-rz-~,,~z-t.:L-1
FIRE DEPARTMENT INFORMATION
NAME:
PRIOR LAKE FIRE DEPT.
AUTHORIZED FIRE DEPT. SIGNATURE
ORDERS WILL NOT BE PROC SSED WITHOUT
AUTHORI D F.D. S AT E
INSTALLATION ADDRESS
- REOUIRED BY FIRE DEPT.
- ATTACH LIST IF MORE ROOM IS NEEDED
41LP\ P At2-\L ('-.h C.Ol-l- &\ AJ e '5. b.
112-\0(2- ~. MJ-j qS-".>TZ-
ORDER FORM - Payment must be submitted with order
S2-SURFACE MOUNT (NO MTG KIT OPTION AVAilABLE) $107.00
S3-SURFACE MOUNT $131.00
S3-SURFACE MOUNT W/lAMPER SWITCHES $16800
R3-RECESSED MOUNT $ 160.00
R3-RECESSED MOUNT WnAMPER SWITCH $ 18600
MOUNTING KIT (OPTIONAL FOR S-3 & R-3 MODELS ONLY) $ 5900
SUB TOTAL
SHIPPING & PROCESSING CHG. $9.00
SUB TOTAL WITH SHIPPING CHG.
MINNESOTA SALES TAX, 6.5%
TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED
ITEM
\/IIhit0 p., Vnlln", (',-q,,, [",AHA ('"
MAIL TO:
OTY
DAMA-MP INC.
PO BOX 47824
PLYMOUTH, MINN.
55447
PRICE
TOTAL
DARRYL SUNDBERG
763-559-3660
Pin!" rnr-lll f'1!C'lnr'CIlc'I"
o ff?f7...1
- 4>
i
.~_..____J
'I /
./i 1/"/.'
~/'. '
r
Jl(:~~:~ % ^"~~'~11 :
P.>&s --- k~ (~7
, /)
-----F...
_/--1 ," I
.__,_/~L-
.----- \
1_:::> . --,
- ~.c:;'J
I ')
; 1/0/
, 'hS-.O f''* .,;~? e ~......-..... (......~;-'
. Z,fA~- I ~ I> B~ ~ t/6c-t:) /A.I P~c.C Ai- <:;;6~e:.. Cr -:
· S?'~\~ ~'S(). ~~fc::~~ ~Dr~
~ ;, ~:r- 0 I ~ \l [ .:>J ~ (~.-; ~ t',*' ~
ft'5 S tJ et\A '6 l..- 'i
\
3 I
Z-Z;'~ ~+ ~ 10].4.5" : 2/lfo 100 Trf61 If10 2...4/?'flu 0_1<
8 /'~ /~~/tf., 5115~ 2.'>
I ?~tJ oa>
I " .~
/000
/1 CCJ f<. 4;- S-k'~... 0.-
Il; ~1S-.2-)-' "
7'>-0 9 ' " f
'f h ~7.o
-S}7t-rC; C;'oilq~-r;;-
/sI:2f/1
1-t>o(a?O-;:'~ 0003 -
900. .-
-
(7-0. -
lOb;::;. -
7DP7':tZ-- Z-~C>0r. h/?
~7i-4fQ) ~tl ~o,D~. -
~.-
51 J ~q .fd,
A Geotechnical Evaluation Report
Proposed Prior Lake Office Building
Village Commerce Building
Prior Lake, Minnesota
Prepared for:
Greystone Construction Company
Professional Certification
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared b~ oJPtl<l>tt 1W9,er my direct supervision
and that I a~~~Jj;~~~lrofessional Engineer
under theli~<ifthe Stafe,Off6innesota.
:: : LIe SED " ~
: ;' PR ulO ::
. =:, EE =
Project BL-05-04456
Braun Intertec Corporation
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: brauninlertec.com
June 30, 2006
Project BL-05-04456
Mr. Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company
500 South Marschall Road, Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Re: Geotechnical Evaluation
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Schmitz:
As you authorized, we have completed the geotechnical evaluation for the proposed Prior Lake office
building. The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation was to assist you and your consultants. in
evaluating the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions with regard to site grading and foundation
support of the office building.
Summary of Results
Three power auger borings were completed in the parking and drive areas of the site, each to nominal
depths of 10 feet below grade.
Five standard penetration test borings were completed in the building and storm pond areas of the site,
each to nominal depths of ranging from 15 to 35 feet below grade.
The soil borings typically encountered between 1 and 8 feet of fill consisting of silty sand, clayey sand,
and sandy lean clay over alluvial deposits consisting of poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand with silt,
and lean clay. Borings ST -6 and ST -7 encountered deposits oflacustrine clay below the alluvial sands
to the boring termination depths.
Groundwater was observed in most of the borings at depths ranging from 5 to 13 feet below the surface,
corresponding to elevations ranging from approximately 960 to 956.
Summary of Recommendations
The borings encountered between 1 and 8 feet of existing fill. Existing fill is not considered suitable for
foundation support of the proposed building. Therefore, we recommend that all existing fill be removed
from the entire building area, and be replaced with compacted, controlled fill.
After completing the earthwork, spread footings with an allowable soil bearing pressure of up to 3,000
pounds per square foot (pst) could be placed on the engineered fill. Please refer to the attached report fOf
more detailed analyses and recommendations.
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-05-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 2
General
Ifwe can provide additional assistance or observation and testing services during construction, please
call Joe Nietfeld at 952.469.3644, or Jim Craig at 952.995.2372.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
. ~}--
~.EJT .
Staff Engineer
Attachment
Geotechnical Evaluation Report
c: Mr. Mike Kettler; Sunde Engineering, Inc.
Mr. Jeff Wrede; Tushie Montgomery Architects, Inc.
GeoRpt-Prior Lake Office Bldg
Table of Contents
Description Page
A. Introduction...... ................. ..... .................................. ........ ..... ....................... ....... ............. ..........1
A.I. Project.. ........ ....... ........ ............. ......... .................. .... .............................. ....... ........ .........1
A.2. Purpose of this Evaluation. ........ .... ....... ....... ....... ..................... .......... ........ .... ..... ..........1
A.3. Scope..... ....... .... ." ...... ...... ... ...... ...... ..... ............... ...... ..: ....... ....... ...... ....... .... ... ..... ......... ..1
AA. Documents Provided......... ....... ....... .... ....... ...... ... ....... ....... ... ...... .... ...... ........ ... ..............2
A.5. . Boring Locations and Elevations..................................................................................2
B. Results....................... ..... .......... .......... ......... ....... ............. ....... ............... ....... ....... ............ ........ ...2
Bc 1. Site Conditions ... ...... ........ .............. .... ............. ................. ........ ....... .... ........ ....... ....... ...2
B.2. Logs ............. ...... ............... ....... ....... ...... ..................... ...... ........ .................. ........ ......... ..2
B.3. Soils....;....... ........ ........ .... ...... ......... ......... .................. ......... ....... ............. ...... ...... ...........3
B.3 .a. Fill. ...... ... ...... ..... ....... ...................... .......;..... .......... ........ .................. ........ ..........3
B.3 .b. Alluvial Deposits. .................... ..................... .............. ....... ................... ...........3
B.3.c. Lacustrine Deposits........... .... ............ ..... ...... ...................... ...... ~ ...... ...... ........ ...3
B .4. Water Level Readings..:................................... ........ ......... ........................... ....... ..........3
C. Analyses and Recommendations.. .......... ........ ........ ........................ ..... ........ .............. ..... ...........3
C.l. Proposed Construction..... ..... .... ..... ...... ............... ........ .............. ..... .............. ....... ....... ...3
C .2. Discussion.....................................................................................................................4
C.3. Site Preparation... ..... ........ ....... ....... ....... ...... ...... ......... ......... .... ........ ....... ....... ..... ...........4
C.4 . Foundations................................................................................................................... 5
.C.4.a. Depth................................................................................................................ 5
C.4.b. Bearing Pressure. ..... ......... ...... .............. ....... ........................... ... ....... ...... .........5
C.4.c. Settlement ..... .... ... ............ ..... ........ ... ... ....... ... ....... ...... ... ... ... ....... ....... ... ..... .... ... 5
C.5. Floor Slab... ..... .... ..... ... ..... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...... ....... ......... ...... ......... .... ...... ........... .......5
C.5 .a. Subgrade Soils.. ....... .............. ........ ............... ....... ...... .......... ...... ............... ....... 5
C.5 .b. Vapor Retarder .............. ......... ........ ....... ....... ............... ..... ....... ....... .................5
C.5 .c. Sub grade Modulus ... ......... ..... ........ ......... ....... ......... ............. ............. ........ .......6
C.6. Exterior Slabs ... ......... .... ... ....... ... ........ ....... ........... ..... ...... ......... ........ .... ....... ......... ........6
C.6.a.. Subgrade ..... ........ ....... ........ ...... ....... ...... ......... ....... ....... ..... ... ...... ....... ...... .........6
C .6. b. Frost Protection........ .... ..... ..... ;....... ......... ....... ....... ...... ......... ..... ...... ..... .... ........6
C.7. Site Grading and Drainage.....:...... ..... ........ ......... ....... ...... ......... ........ ........... .................6
C.8. Pavement.... ......... ............. ....... ....... ....... ......... .... ....... ......... ... ... ...... ... ...... ....... ...............7
C.8.a. Subgrade Preparation.............. ....... ........ ....... ............. ............... ...... .......... .......7
C.8.b. Anticipated Subgrade ........ ... ... ..... ......... ...... ......... .......... ..... .................. .......... 7
. C.9. Utilities..... .......... .... .......... ...... ....... ....... ........ ...... ...... ......... ........ .............. ......................7
C.I0. Storm water Pond ............ .............. ...... ....... ................ ...... ...... ............... ....... ........ .........8
D. Additional Recommendations for Construction............ ,. ....... ........... .... ........ ...... ....... .... ...........8
D.I. Excavation ........ ....... ....... ............... ...... ............., ...... ......... .:............. ..c.... ..... ............. .... 8
D.2. Observations...... ...... ....... ....... ........ ........ .......... ........... ........ ...... .......... ... ............. ........... 8
D.3. Testing..... ...;..... ......... ........... ....... ........ ..... ........ ,. ....... ....................... ..... ........ .:.............8
DA. Cold Weather Construction .... ....... ...... ....... ............. ......... ...... ......... ...... ...... ......... ........9
E. Procedures. ....... ......... ... .... ...... ............... ............ ........ ......,. ....... ............. .......... ............. ...............9
E."!. Drilling and Sampling...... ............ ................ ....... ........ .............. .... ......... ........ ....... ........ 9
E.2. Soil.Classifications .... ............. ....... ...... ................ ............. ...... ................ ..... ....... ........ ..9
E.3. Groundwater Observations ....... ............. ........ .... ........ ............................ ........ ........ :....1 0
F. General Recommendations ..... .... ....... ........ ...... ......... .............. .... .... .................... ...... ............. ..1 0
F.l. Basis of Recommendations.........................................................................................1 0
F .2. Review of Design........................... ..;... ....... ..... .......... .................................... ........ .....1 0
F.3. Groundwater Fluctuations .............................................................. .............................1 0
F .4. Use of Report.... ....... ........................... ...................... ....... ...................... ........ ..... ....... .11
F.5. Level of Care ............. ............. ............. ..... ........ .......... ..................... ........... .... ....... ......11
Appendix
Boring Location Sketch
Log of Boring Sheets ST-l through ST-8
Descriptive Terminology
A. Introduction
A.t. Project
The property is located in the southwest quadrant of Park Nicollet Road and County Road 39 in
Prior Lake, Minnesota. We understand the project will include construction of a stormwater pond,
a two-story office building, and associated parking and drive areas.
A.2. Purpose of this Evaluation
The purpose of this geotechnical evaluation was to provide geotechnical information and recommendations
for use in the design and construction of the project.
A.3. Scope
According to our proposal, dated June 5, 2006, our Scope of Services included the following:
. Staking the boring locations and coordinating the location of underground utilities near the
boring locations.
. . Conducting four standard penetration test borings in.the proposed building areas to a nominal
depth of 25 feet.
. Conducting three power auger borings in the proposed parking areas to a depth of 7 feet.
. Returning the samples to our laboratory for visual classification and logging by a geotechnical
engineer.
. Conducting limited laboratory tests on select soil samples.
. Analyzing the results of the field and laboratory tests.
. Submitting a geotechnical evaluation report containing logs of the borings, our analyses of the
field and laboratory tests, and recommendations regarding design and construction of the
project.
Ultimately, the project scope was changed to compensate for the soil conditions encountered while
drilling. Borings ST-6 and ST-7 were drilled to depths of35 feet to penetrate through soft lacustrine clay
soils. Boring ST-4 was drilled to a depth of20 feet since competent alluvial sands were reached.
Boring ST -8 was drilled to a depth of IS feet, since it was needed for design of the stormwater pond.
Power Auger Borings PAB-l, PAB-2, and PAB-3 were drilled to a depth of 10 feet for parking lot
support.
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-OS-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 2
A.4. Documents Provided
We were provided with a copy of a site sketch prepared by Sunde Engineering Company (Sunde).
The sketch was titled, "Prior Lake Office." The sketch was dated, February 28, 2006. The sketch
showed the general layout of the proposed development.
A.S. Boring Locations and Elevations
A Boring Location Sketch showing the approximate boring locations is attached with this report. The
borings were located in the field by measuring off existing building and roadways with a measuring tape,
estimating right angles. The boring elevations were surveyed by Braun Intertec and referenced to the top
nut of the catch basin in the sO).lthwest comer ofPranklin Avenue and Park Nicollet Road. An elevation
of 962.2 was used as a benchmark.
B. Results
B.l. Site Conditions
The property is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Park Nicollet Road and County
Road 39 in Prior Lake, Minnesota. The property currently stands as a relatively flat parcel of land and
is covered with tall grasses and trees.
B.2. Logs
Log of Boring sheets indicating the depths and identifications of the various soil strata, penetration
resistances, laboratory test data, and groundwater observations are attached. The strata changes were
inferred from the changes in the penetration test samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as
changes between the strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions and the depths of the
changes vary between the borings.
Geologic origins presented for each stratum on the Log of Boring sheets are based on the soil types,
blows per foot, and available common knowledge of the depositional history of the site. Because of the
complex glacial and post-glacial depositional environments, geologic origins are frequently difficult to
ascertain. A detailed investigation of the geologic history of the site was not performed.
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-05-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 3
B.3. Soils
B.3.a. Fill
At the surface, the borings encountered existing fill to depths ranging from about 1 to 7 feet. The
existing fill was generally clayey sand and silty sand that was dark brown to brown in color.
B.3.b. Alluvial Deposits
Below the existing fill, the borings encountered alluvial dep()sits. The alluvial deposits generally
consisted of poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt. Boring ST-7 encountered alluvial lean
and fat clays below alluvial sands. Borings ST-4 and ST-5 encountered alluvial clayey sand below the
alluvial sands. Penetration resistances within the alluvial sand soils ranged from 2 to 16 blows per foot
(BPF), indicating very loose to medium dense conditions, with the majority being medium dense.
Penetration resistances in the alluvial clay soils ranged from 4 to 9 BPF, indicating rather soft to rather
stiff conditions.
B.3.c. Lacustrine Deposits
Below the alluvial deposits, Borings ST-6 and ST-7 encountered lacustrine deposits to the boring
termination depth. The lacustrine deposits consisted of lean and fat clays that were gray in color.
Penetration resistances within the lacustrine clays ranged from 4 to 11 BPF, indicating rather soft to
. rather stiff conditions.
B.4. Water Level Readings
Groundwater was observed in most of the borings at depths ranging from 5 to 13 feet below the surface.
This corresponds to elevations ranging from approximately 960 to 956. Seasonal and annual fluctuations
of the groundwater levels should be anticipated.
C. Analyses and Recommendations
C.l. Proposed Construction
The proposed construction will include a two-story office building and associated roadways and parking
areas. A stormwater pond will also be constructed. We assume the building will be slab-on-grade
constructed at or near existing grades. We have assumed a floor grade of elevation 964. The building
will likely be two levels ofwood-fnime construction and supported on concrete strip footings. The
approximate building footprint will be 10,000 square feet. Based on these assumptions, we estimate wall
loads on the order of 4 kips per linear foot, and interior column loads up to 150 kips.
.. .... _....._...__.______......._......._. . .... h...._._._...._.._____..__.___._______..____._._.__.___________.__.~__._____..._.n__ ......_..m...___.._...._......_........_~_______.._...._..
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-05-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 4
C.2. Discussion
The existing fill encountered in the borings must be removed from below the proposed building area.
It may also be necessary to do a subcut below the parking areas in order to provide 3 feet of compacted
soils below the subgrade.
Groundwater may be encountered in the deeper portions of the excavations.
C.3. Site Preparation
Below, we have provided a table listing recommended.excavation depths at the boring locations. Actual
depth of excavation will vary and should be determined in the field by observation by a geotechnical
engineer or his representative.
T bI 1 R
ddE
D h
a e . ecommen e xcavabon eot s
Recommended
Excavation Depth Approximate
Borin!! # Surface Elevation (rt) Bottom Elevation Comments
PAB-l 962.5 1 - 3 961 112 - 959 1/2 Parking - see report
PAB-2 967.0 1-3 966 - 964 Parking - see report
PAB.3 966.4 1~3 965 1/2 - 963 1/2 Parking - see report
ST-4 965.5 5-& 960 - 958 Building
ST-5 964.5 1 963 Building
ST-6 964.6 8 956 Building
ST-7 964.2 2 962 Building
ST-8 964.2 - - Stonn Pond - see report
The excavation for the proposed building should be oversized to provide lateral stability to the fill and
footings.. Oversizing should be on a I: 1 ratio down and away from the outside edge of the proposed
footings.
In portions ofthe deeper excavations, water will likely be encountered. We recommend clean sand, with
less than 6 percent passing a number 200 sieve, be use in the lower portion of the excavation. Once the
fill is above the water level, less select fill could be used as engineered fill.
Some of the existing fill could be reused as controlled, engineered fill. All organic soils, and any wet
clay portions ofthe existing fill, should be removed.
We recommend a predominantly granular soil be used to fill the site back up to proposed floor grade.
The fill should be placed in uniform layers, less than I-foot thick, and compacted with heavy vibratory
roller. Fill should be compacted to a minimum of9S percent standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698).
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-OS-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 5
In the paved areas, we recommend the existing fill be subcut I to 2 feet below proposed grade. The
exposed sub grade should then be test rolled with a heavy loaded truck to identify additional soft areas
that require subcutting. Additional soft areas should be subcut a maximum of an additional 2 feet.
The exposed surface soils should be uniformly compacted to 100 percent standard Proctor density. The
parking area should then be filled with suitable soils up to proposed grade. Fill placed in parking areas
should be compacted to 100 percent standard Proctor density in the upper 3 feet of the sub grade. Again,
some of the on-site, existing fill could be reused in the parking area. All organic soils and soft wet clay
portions of the existing fill should be removed.
Fill placed for building support should be compacted within 3 percentage points ofthe optimum moisture
content, as determined by the standard Proctor density. Fill placed in parking areas should be compacted
to a moisture content no more then I percentage point over the optimum moisture content.
CA. Foundations
C.4.a. Depth
We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 3 1/2 feet below exterior grade for frost
protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately beneath the slab. Footings for unheattrl
portions ofthe structure should be placed at least 5 feet below grade for frost protection.
C.4.b. Bearing Pressure
Based on the soils encountered in the soil borings, and assuming the site corrections are completed as
recommended, it is our opinion the footings for the new building can be designed for a net allowable
bearing pressure up to 3,000 pounds per square foot (pst).
C.4.c. Settlement
Based on the assumed loads, we estimate total settlement will be less than 1 inch, with differential
settlement less than 1/2 inch.
C.S. Floor Slab
C.5.a. Subgrade Soils
The anticipated floor subgrade will be granular fill. Foundations and utility trenches within the building
footprint should be backfilled in thin lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard
Proctor maximum dry density.
C.5.b. Vapor Retarder
If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend a vapor
retarder be placed beneath the slab. (Some coverings, coatings or situations may require a vapor barrier,
i.e., a membrane with a permeance less than 0.3 perms.)
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-OS-044S6
June 30, 2006
Page 6
Industry standards generally allow burying the vapor retarder or barrier beneath a layer of sand to reduce
. curling and shrinkage of the concrete, but this practice risks trapping water between the slab and vapor
retarder or barrier.
C.5.c. Subgrade Modulus
The anticipated floor subgrade is granular fill. It is our opinion that a modulus of sub grade reaction, k, of
150 pounds per square inch per inch of deflection (pei) may be used to design the floor. If a minimum of
6 inches of compacted crushed gravel road base is placed immediately beneath the floor,
it is our opinion that a modulus of200 pci may be used to design the floor.
C.6. Exterior Slabs
C.6.a. Subgrade
We recommend the vegetation and topsoil be removed from beneath the proposed slabs. Fills and
backfills below exterior slabs should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor
maximum dry density.
C.6.b. Frost Protection
The on-site silty sand and clayey sand soils are slightly frost-susceptible. If these soils become saturated
and freeze, 1 to 2 inches of heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance for slabs or steps in front of
doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to reduce this heave is to remove any frost-susceptible
soils down to bottom-of-footing level and replace them with non frost-susceptible sand or sandy gravel.
Sand or sandy gravel with less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a number 200 sieve is
non frost-susceptible.
An alternative for reducing frost heave is to support the steps and slabs on frost-depth footings. A void
space of 4 inches should be provided to allow the soils to heave without affecting the step/slab.
C.7. Site Grading and Drainage
We recommend the site be graded to provide a positive runoff away from the proposed structure. We
recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs
be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition, we recommend gutters and downspouts with long splash
blocks or extensions.
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-05-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 7
C.S. Pavement
C.8.a. Subgrade Preparation
Based on the soil borings, the subgrade soils within the parking areas will be clayey sand and silty sand.
We recommend removing the topsoil, vegetation, and I to 2 feet of the existing fill. 1'he subgrade should
be proof rolled to identify soft or unstable areas.
Fill placed within 3 feet of any pavement subgrade .elevation should be compacted to a minimum of
100 percent of its standard Proctor dry density. Fill placed more than 3 feet below pavements should be
compacted to a minimum of95 percent.
C.8.b. Anticipated Subgrade
After grading, we anticipate the subgrade will consist of silty sand or clayey sand.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation "Geotechnical and Pavement Manual" indicates this soil
typically has R-values ranging from 10 to 75 for silty and clayey sands. We used an assumed a value of
50 for our pavement design recommendations with a clayey sand subgrade. (Actual laboratory tests to
determine the R-value of soil samples were not included in our Scope of Services.)
Design Sections
We recommend the following minimum layer thicknesses for the anticipated subgrade soils below the
pavement section.
T bl 2 p.
tD . S f
a e . avemen esum ec IOns
Pavement Light Use Heavy Use
Sections (inches) (inches)
Bituminous 3 4
Aggregate Base 6 8
Granular Subbase --- . ---
C.9. Utilities
The soils at depth appear suitable for support of underground utilities. The native sands encountered
on the site will likely be suitable bedding material for under the pipes. The utility trenches should be
backfilled in thin lifts and compacted to the specifications described in Section C.3 of this report.
Groundwater may be encountered in some ofthe utility excavation. Dewatering would then be required.
Localized sumps may be adequate for small areas; otherwise, well points could be used.
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-05-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 8
C.IO. Stormwater Pond
A stormwater pond is proposed at the north end of the site where Boring ST-8 was completed. We
understand the bottom of the pond would be at about elevation 954. This would put the bottom of the
pond approximately 3 feet below what appears to be the groundwater level on the site. Boring ST-8
encountered fme-grained silty sand at about elevation 954. We would anticipate the silty sand would
have a permeability rate on the order of I x 10.5 em per second. However, laboratory tests were not
conducted on this material to try to quantify the permeability rates.
The upper soils at Boring ST -8 appear to be loose fill soils. It may be beneficial to excavate into the
proposed pond slopes and recompact the upper portion of the fill to provide a more stable side slope.
The extent of this recompaction will depend on sides lope design and proposed water levels.
D. Additional Recommendations for Construction
D.l. Excavation
It is our opinion the soils encountered by the borings can be excavated with a backhoe or front-end
loader. The borings indicated the sandy soils that will likely be encountered in the sidewalls ofthe
excavations will be Type C soils, under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) guidelines. One-and-one-half horizontal to one vertical (1.5: I) side slopes
or sheeting should be provided.
D.2. Observations
We recommend all excavation, footing, slab, and pavement subgrades be ob5etved by a geotechnical
engineer to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered by the borings and adequate
to support the proposed construction. Oversize of excavations below perimeter and isolated footing
grades should also be checked. These observations should be conducted prior to placing backfills, fills,
or forms for footings.
D.3. Testing
We recommend density tests be performed in the fill placed beneath footings and slabs. At least one test
should be performed for every 2,500 square feet and every 2 vertical feet offill placed. Samples of
proposed backfill and fill materials should be submitted to our testing laboratory at least three days prior
to placement for evaluation of their suitability and determination of their optimum moisture contents and
maximum Proctor dry densities.
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-05-04456
Juile 30, 2006
Page 9
D.4. Cold Weather Construction
If site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, we recommend good winter
construction practices be observed. All snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior
to additional grading. No fill should be placed on soils that have frozen or contain frozen material.
No frozen soils should be used as fill.
Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM C 94. Concrete
should not be placed upon frozen soils or soils which contain frozen material. Concrete should be
protected from freezing until the necessary strength is attained. Prost should not be pennitted to
. .
penetrate below footings bearing on frost-susceptible soil since such freezing could heave and crack
the footings and/or foundation walls.
E. Procedures
E.1. Drilling and Sampling
We performed the penetration test and power auger borings on June 9, 2006 and June 12, 2006, with
a core and auger drill equipped with 3 1/4-inch inside diameter hollow-stem auger mounted on a truck
carrier. Sampling for the borings was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1586, ''Penetration
. Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils." We advanced the boreholes with the hollow-stem auger to the
desired test depths. A 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches was then used to drive the
standard 2-inch split-barrel sampler a total penetration of 1 1/2 feet below the tip of the hollow-stem
auger. The blows for the last I-foot of penetration were recorded and are an index of soil strength
characteristics. Samples were taken at 2 1/2-foot vertical intervals to the 15-foot depth, and then at
5-foot intervals to the termination depths of the borings. A representative portion of each sample was
then sealed in a glass jar capped with a lid.
E.2. Soil Classifications
Our drill crew chief visually and manually classified soils encountered in the borings in general
accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure)."
A summary of the ASTM classification system is attached. All samples were then returned to our
laboratory for review of the field classifications by a geotechnical engineer. Representative samples will
remain in our office for a period of30 days to be available for your examination.
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-05-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 10
E.3. Groundwater Observations
. Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottoms of the borings, the holes were probed through
the hollow-stem auger to check for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after withdrawal of the
auger, the holes were again probed and the depths to water or cave-ins were noted. The borings were
then immediately backfilled.
F. General Recommendations
F.l. Basis of Recommendations
The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the
soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Often, variations occur between
these borings, the nature and extent of which do not become evident until additional exploration or
construction is conducted. A reevaluation ofthe recommendations in this report should be made after
performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The
variations may result in additional grading or foundation costs, and it is suggested that it contingency be
provided for this purpose.
It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program for the site
preparation phase of this project. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during
construction to the soil borings, and will provide continuity of professional responsibility.
F .2. Review of Design
This report is based on the design of the proposed Prior Lake Office development as related to us for
preparation ofthis report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of
the designs and specifications. With the review, we will evaluate whether any changes in design have
affected the validity of the recommendations, and whether our recommendations have been correctly
interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications.
F.3. Groundwater Fluctuations
We made water level observations in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the
boring logs. These data were interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was
relatively short, and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation,
spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were
made. Design drawings and specifications, and construction planning should recognize the possibility of
fluctuations.
Greystone Construction Company
Project BL-05-04456
June 30, 2006
Page 11
F.4. Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of Greystone Construction Company and their design team to use to
design the proposed facility updates. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation
and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analyses, and
recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties
contemplating other structures or purposes contact us.
F.5. Level of Care
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exerciscl under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality.
No warranty, express or implied, is made.
GeoRpt-Prior Lake Office B1dg
__ n _________ __~~________ --- ---- - ---- - ---- --- ~----~----------- - - ----""------"-
Appendix
I Z U
I, :>> UJ
z ~
$ cc 0::
UJ
~ ~
II z
I COUNTY ROAD 39
GAS
OH IOKe
o
i
!
i
!
I
I
!
"'; .1
N I
~ !
It I
",a. I
CD I
-0 I
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
~ I
:NT
;
I
j
i
i
;
J
j
)< !
15" CMPLJ
ST s. l ./
i
r "
,
,
!
;
I
;
;
;
,
i
;
;
;
;
:.:,
"
"
lA
L
I
I
i
i
oi
;
;
;
,
,
i
!
,;
1
j
i
,
.
i
"'lJ...
6 <Ii lfi .
-..;.~
5~gj<Ii
0)0---
w--~
~~~
lSg~,
lJ...1..L.~
~I-~~
<f1
I
N
,~
!J
>-
~
Ll"l
,,0 - ;oL'-
"'.m
(11 ~_...-
,
0)
<f1
-'
-'
<{
I-
<f1
'"
z
;;2
llo!
<{
n..
,,1b-,tb
;
.c-t-.
;
I
.j
!
,
-.~r..~..:t
,
"'~
I f\f'!~_.._ .
[l)!
9
tt.
1\
o
,
1
'd:,
\
~
2
-t
I
01
~I
.c~
o ,-
~:!:!
.lll::iz
Cl)a1:E
S Cb ~
~E~
tJo~
o Cb ...
...J~O
0) cu 'E:
0) c -I 0..
c: 'i: ...
'C 0 0
o m'i:
CD Q.
.....
U)
~
c:
o
:;:::;
CO
...
.....
C1)
c
C1)
a.
'E
a:l
"0
c:
a:l
Ci5
-
o
c:
o
:;:::;
CO
()
.3
2 ~
a:l
E
'x
o
l-
e..
e..
<t:
U)
C1)
<5 ~
c:
C1)
o
S flGl.RE NO.
z
<(
...1.
o...~
l1J:
f-;
-~
If)~
co
o
o
C'l
.
C'?
-
.
CO
o
~....
i....
(/)
CO
II)
;
o
I
II)
3
m
CIl
c:
o
z
Q::tJ)
.,0::
....
>'
...,., 0
I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Q)
-B
II>
~
BRAUN'"
INTERTEC
Braun Project BL-05-04456
GEOTECHNICAL EV ALVA TION
Prior Lake Office Building
Park NicoIlet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mike McWilliams I METHOD: Power Auger
Elev.
feet
962.5
962.0
-
-
956.5
-
954.5
~ -
952.5
-
<
1 -
{-
-
-
-
-
I -
~ -
-
-
-
l -
1-
-
-
1-
'-
,
-
-
-
LOG OF BORING
BORING: P AB-l
LOCATION: See attached sketch.
DATE:
6/12/06
I SCALE:
1"=4'
Depth
feet ASTM
0.0 Symbol
0.5 PILL
FILL
BPF WL Tests or Notes
Description of Materials
(ASTM 02488 or 02487)
FILL: Silt fme-lITained with Or!!anics. black. drv.
FILL: Clayey Sand, fme-grained, with Clay layers,
brown and black, moist to dry.
Benchmark: Surface elevations
_ were referenced to the top of
the catch basin in the southwes
- comer of Franklin and Park
NicoIlet. Benchmark elevation
- was 962.2 feet.
-
-
6.0
..
SP- .. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, with Clay layers,
8M . ' brown, moist. -
8.0
(Possible Fill)
.. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained,
brown, moist.
-
SP .....
10.0
(Alluvium)
END OF POWER AUGER BORING.
'. ".
. ..
. .
-
Water not observed with 10 feet of hollow-stem auger in
the ground. -
Water not observed to cave-in depth of 7 feet
immediately after withdrawing the auger.
-
-
Boring immediately backfilled.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Braun Intertec I..:orporatlon
J'AJ:S.l page I 011
BRAUN'M
INTERTEC
Braun Project BL-05-04456
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Prior Lake Office Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mike McWilliams I METHOD: Power Auger
LOG OF BORING
BORING: PAB-2
LOCATION: See attached sketch.
DATE:
6/12/06
I SCALE:
1"=4'
Elev.
feet
967.0
Depth
feet ASTM
0.0 Symbol
FILL
Description of Materials BPF WL
(ASTM D2488 or D2487)
FILL: Silty Sand, fine-grained, dark brown, dry to moist.
-
Tests or Notes
-
964.0
3.0
FILL
FILL: Clayey Sand, fine-grained, with a trace of Gravel,
black, moist.
-
-
-
960.0
959.0
7.0
8.0
8M .:.:., ::' SILTY SAND, fine-grained, with Clay seams, dark
: ..:.. brown moist.
SP ':: ~::'-::' \' (Mixed Alluvium) r
..; ..... POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained, -
., ..., ' with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist.
. . (Alluvium) -r
END OF POWER AUGER BORING.
-
957.0
10.0
<J _
Water not observed with 10 feet of hollow-stem auger in
the ground. -
Boring immediately backfilled.
-
-
-
-
-
t_
~ -
-
-
-
-
-
-
~-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
m;::us:U44:
I:lraun !ntertee CorporatIon
l' Al:l-;'! pap;e 1 011
BRAUNSM
INTERTEC
Braun Project BL-05-04456
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Prior Lake Office Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mike McWilliams I METHOD: Power Auger
Elev.
feet
966.4
965.4
-
961.4
-
959.4
-
<
-
956.4
-
, -
-
-
-
-
-
( -
~ -
-
-
-
-
l
i-
-
-
1-
~-
,
-
-
-
-
Depth
feet ASTM
0.0 Symbol
FILL
1.0
FILL
5.0
SP-
SM
7.0
10.0
SP
::'. .<.
k<;..
I.:'.>:
.::...,
BORING:
LOG OF BORING
LOCATION: See attached sketch.
P AB-3
Description of Materials
(ASTM D2488 or 02487)
FILL: Silty Sand, fine-grained, dark brown, moist.
FILL: Clayey Sand, fine- to medium-grained, dark
brown, moist.
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to
medium-grained, with a trace of Gravel and Clay layers, -
brown, moist.
(Possible Filn
POORLY GRADED SAND, fme- to medium-grained,
with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist.
(Alluvium)
END OF POWER AUGER BORING.
-
Water not observed with 10 feet of hollow-stem auger in
the ground. -
Water not observed to cave-in depth of7 feet -
immediately after withdrawing the auger.
lIraun Intertec corporation
DATE:
-
-
6/12/06
BPF WL
-
-
-
yo
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-I. SCALE:
1"=4'
Tests or Notes
Y AJ:j- j page 1 on
BRAUN'M
I NTERTEC
Braun Project BL-05-04456
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Prior Lake Office Buildi.ng
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mike McWilliams I METHOD: 3 114" HSA Autohammer
Elev.
feet
965.5
963.5
960.5
958.0
,
955.5
.
~ -
~-
E
1-
<
~ 946.5
945.0
HL-U)-U44:
Depth
feet ASTM
0.0 Symbol
FILL
2.0
FILL
5.0
SM ,.
7.5
SP .' ....
10.0
SP ......
- .,:..,
19.0
SC
20.5
BORING:
LOG OF BORING
LOCATION: See attached sketch.
ST-4
DATE:
Description of Materials
(ASTM D2488 or 02487)
FILL: Silty Sand, with Sand seams, black, dry.
FILL: Poorly Graded Sand, fine- to medium-grained, 9
with a trace of Gravel and Silty Sand, brown, dry. -
SILTY SAND, fine-grained, with a trace of Gravel,
brown, moist, medium dense.
(Possible Fill)
..'.
. .
POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained,
with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense.
(Alluvium)
POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, with
a trace of Gravel, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. -
(Alluvium)
:. ".::.
~
CLA YEY SAND, with a little Gravel, brown,
waterbearing, loose.
(Alluvium'
END OF BORING.
-
Water observed at 5 feet with 20 feet of hollow-stem
auger in the ground.
Water observed at 5 l/2 feet immediately after
withdrawing the auger;
Boring immediately backfilled.
-
tlraun lntertec CorporatIOn
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6/12/06
I SCALE:
1" == 4'
BPF WL
Tests or Notes
12
"Sl
~ An open triangle in the water
level (WL) column indicates
the depth at which groundwate
was observed while drilling.
Groundwater levels fluctuate.
A solid triangle indicates the
groundwater level in the borinl
on the date indicated.
10
16
10
7
1;1-4 page I or 1
BRAUN'M
I NTE RTEC
LOG OF BORING
Braun Project BL-05-04456 BORING: ST-5
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch.
Prior Lake Office Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mike McWilliams I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 6/12/06 I SCALE: 1"=4'
Elev. Depth
feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes
964.5 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or 02487)
FILL ~ FILL: Silty Sand, fine-grained, dark brown, dry.
963.5 1.0
SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to
SM " medium-grained, with a little fine Gravel, brown, moist to_
-
..... . 8 feet then waterbearing, medium dense. 16
..
- . , (Alluvium) -
,:,'
- ::: . -
- - 15
- .... -
- - .!.
....
. . -
. -
. I:....
- I:. -
954.5 ro.O ....... 13
SP I... POORLY GRADED SAND, with a trace of Gravel,
- 1::\. brown, waterbearing, medium dense to loose. -
I:, ..::..:. (Alluvium)
~ - 1:,:..::<. -
I.:.. :..:
- 1':::" -
"
- I: " -
1/:::::.
- I:. ., - 6
I::,::::.
- 1:., '. -
1':.:..:.:.:
- -
, - r..\:- -
~ I:. ..
- L::,,>:' -
944.5 20.0 .. 7
SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to
- SM ,. medium-grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, -
..... waterbearing, loose.
'.
- (Alluvium) -
..
~ . .
- I:.. .:. -
; .'
s 940.5 24.0
~ SC !Y, .. CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, with a trace of Gravel,
~:.. gray, waterbearing, rather stiff. - 9
-939.0 25.5 ' . (Alluvium )
- END OF BORING. -
1- Water observed at 7 feet with 24 feet of hollow-stem
auger in the ground.
~- -
, Water observed at 7 feet immediately after withdrawing
- the auger. -
- Boring immediately backfilled. -
- -
- - tlraunrnterleCl:orporalIon ~T-~ page I ot I
BRAUN'"
I NTE RTEC
Brann Project BL-05-04456
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Prior Lake Office Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mark Barber METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer
Elev.
feet
964.6
Depth
feet ASTM
0.0 Symbol
FILL
BORING:
LOG OF BORING
LOCA nON: See attached sketch.
ST-6
DATE:
Description of Materials
(ASTM D2488 or D2487)
FILL: Clayey Sand, fine-grained, with Gravel, dark
brown, dry to moist.
6/9/06
BPF WL
16
19
.Y
15
956.6 8.0
SP POORLY GRADED SAND, medium grained, with
Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense.
(Alluvium) 8
953.6 11.0
SP- POORL Y GRADED SAND with SILT, brown,
SM waterbearing, loose. "!l-
(Alluvium)
949.6
15.0
SP
944.6
20.0
CL
939.6
25.0
CH
POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained,
brown to gray, waterbearing, loose.
(Alluvium)
LEAN CLAY, with Silt, gray, wet, rather stiff.
(Lacustrine)
FAT CLAY, gray, wet, stiff to rather stiff.
(Lacustrine)
8
6
11
7
SCALE:
1" =4'
Tests or Notes
BRAUN'"
I NTE RTEC
Braun Project BL-05-04456
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Prior Lake Office Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mark Barber METHOD:
Elev.
feet
932.6
Depth
feet ASTM
32.0 Symbol
-929.1
35.5
3 1/4" HSA Autohammer
Description of Materials
(ASTM D24&8 or 024&7)
FAT CLAY, gray, wet, stiff to rather stiff.
(Lacustrine) (continued)
END OF BORING.
LOG OF BORING
BORING: ST-6 (cont.)
LOCATION: See attached sketch.
DATE:
Water observed at 12 feet with 33 feet of hollow-stem
auger in the ground.
Water observed at 7 feet immediately after withdrawing
the auger.
Boring immediately backfJ.11ed.
6/9/06
SCALE:
BPF WL
Tests or Notes
8
1" =4'
BRAUN'M
I NTE RTEC
Braun Project BL-05-04456
GEOTECHNICAL EV ALUA TION
Prior Lake Office Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake~ Minnesota
DRILLER: Mark Barber
Elev.
feet
964.2
Depth
feet ASTM
0.0 Symbol
FILL
962.2 2.0
SP
953.2
11.0
SP .,
LOG OF BORING
BORING: ST -7
LOCATION: See attached sketch.
METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer
DATE:
Description of Materials
(ASTM D2488 or 02487)
FILL: Silty Sand, fme-grained, with Gravel, brown, dry
to moist.
POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained,
with a little Gravel, brown, dry to 7 1/2 feet then wet,
medium dense.
. .
.,
(Alluvium)
., ,
.....
'"" "
POORLY GRADED SAND, fme- to coarse-grained, with
Gravel, gray, waterbearing, medium dense.
. (Alluvium)
......,
.... "
',' "
'.....
Drilled with head of water below 15 feet.
..... '.
. ,"',
LEAN CLAY, with Silt, gray, wet, rather soft.
(Lacustrine)
FAT CLAY, gray, wet, rather soft.
(Lacustrine)
orporatlOn
6/9/06
SCALE:
1"=4'
BPF WL
Tests or Notes
10
16
10
.Y
10
'Sl
10
4
4
4
BRAUNS"
I NTE RTEC
Braun Project BL-05-04456
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Prior Lake Office Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mark Barber METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer
Elev. Depth
feet feet
932.2 32.0
930.2 34.0
CL
-928.7 35.5
LOG OF BORING
BORING: ST -7 (cont.
LOCA nON: See attached sketch.
DATE:
Description of Materials
(ASTM D2488 or D2487)
FAT CLAY, gray, wet, rather soft.
(Lacustrine) (continued)
LEAN CLAY, gray, wet, medium.
(Lacustrine)
END OF BORING.
Water observed at 12 feet with 33 feet of hollow-stem
auger in the ground.
Water observed at 7 feet immediately after withdrawing
the auger.
Boring immediately backfilled.
raun lertec orporallon
6/9/06
SCALE:
BPF WL
Tests or Notes
8
1" == 4'
BRAUN""
INTERTEC
LOG OF BORING
Braun Project BL-05-04456 BORING: ST-8
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch.
Prior Lake Office Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
DRILLER: Mark Barber I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 6/9/06 T SCALE: 1" "'4'
Elev. Depth
feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes
964.2 0.0 Symbol (ASTM 02488 or 02487)
FILL FILL: Organic Clay, brown, dry to moist
- -
- - 3
961.2 3.0
FILL FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, fine- to medium-grained, with a
960.2 4.0 little Gravel brown. drY"to moist.
SC CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, with a trace of Gravel,
- ??'. brown, moist to wet, loose. - 5
.~:".: (possible Fill)
- -
- y. . -
:i . 4
956.2 8.0 : ';I." .f-
SC ~. CLAYEY SAND, fme- to medium-grained, with a little
- ~'... Gravel, brown, wet, very loose. -
"3 (Mixed Alluvium) 2
953.7 10.5 -
- SM .. "" SILTY SAND, fine-grained, brown, wet, very loose to -
.$ loose.
- (Mixed Alluvium) -
'. ..
..
~ ' " '5l
- -
- -
949.2 15.0 . . 7
948.7 15.5 SP- \;OORL Y GRADED SAND with CLAY, fine- to f
- ~ medium-grained, gray, waterbearing, loose.
(Mixed Alluvium)
- END OF BORING. -
:- Water observed at 13 feet while drilling. -
~ - Water observed at 7 feet immediately after withdrawing -
- the auger. -
- Water observed at 6 feet, 1/2 hour after withdrawing the _
auger.
- -
~ Water observed at 8 feet, 72 hours after withdrawing the
- auger. -
~- Boring then backfilled. -
- -
~ - -
~ - -
[
~- -
~- -
~
r;- -
- -
llL.U).U44~ () llraun Intertec Corporal1on ~T-lS pal!;e 1 ot
'Descriptive Terminology
Rev. 10104
.
lllTfJRNATtONAL
Standard D 2487 - 00
Classification of Solis for Engineering Purposes
(Unified Soil Classification System)
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Salls Classification
Group Names Using Laboratory Tests a Group
Symbol Group Name b
c: Gravels Clean Gravels C. ~ 4 and 1:5. C,:5. 3 c GW Wall-graded gravel d
Ul 0 More than 50% of Less than 5% fines.
~al C <4and/or1 >C,>3c GP Poorly graded gravel d
en.~ Q) coarse fraction
al ~.~ retained on Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel dI 9
I:: - ., No.4 sieve More than 12% fines · Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey Qravel dIg
'01 ~ 0
~oo Sands Clean Sands C. ~ 6 and 1 :5. C, :5. 3 c SW Well-graded sand h
~~N
~ ci 50% or more of Less than 5% fines I C. < 6 andlor 1 > Cc>3 c SP Poorly graded sand h
.c:Z
ca- coarse fraction
0'" Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand 'gh
Ua passes
E No.4 sieve More than 12% I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clavev sand .gh
Ol Inorganic PI :>- 7 and plots on or above"N line J CL Lean clay k I m
.c Slits and Clays
"'- PI < 4 or plots below "A' linel Silt" I m
= "0 Liquid limit ML
~~~ Liquid Iimil- oven dried OL Organic clay k 1m"
"C l'J.~ less than 50 Organic < 0.75
'" 0. In Liouid limit - not dried OL Organic silt" I m 0
.~ i!! 8 PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat ciaI' k I m
eON Inorganic
'i"Ed Sills and clays PI plots below"N line MH Elastic sill k I m
:goZ Liquid limit
U:~ 50 or more Organic Liquid limit- Oven dried < 0.75 OH Organic clay k Imp
g Liquid limit - not dried OH Organic silt" I m q
Highly Organic Salls Primarily organic matler, dark In color and organic odor PT Peat
e. Based on the material passing the 3.in (75mm) sieve.
b. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both. add "with cobbles or boulders or both" to group name.
C, C. - O..! 0" C,: (0,.)2
D,0xDeo
d. If soli contains ;"15% sand, add "with sand" to group name,
e. Gravels wltih 5 to 12% lines require dual symbols:
GW.GM well-graded gravel with sUt
GW-GC wel~graded gravel with clay
GP-GM poorly graded gravel v.ith sUt
GP-GC poorly graded gravel v.ith clay
f. If fines classify as CL-ML. use dual symbol GC-GM or SC-SM.
g. If fines are organic, add '"with organic lines" to group name,
h, If soil contains .,15% gravel, add 'with gravel" to group name.
Sands with 5 to 12% lines require dual symbols:
SW.SM weli-graded sand with silt
SW-SC wel~graded sand with clay
SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt
SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay
j. If AtiertJerg limits plot in halched area, sou is a CL-ML. silty day,
k. If soil contains 15to 29% plus No. 200, add "wIth sand' or 'with gravel" whichever is predominant.
I. If soli contains:;, 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add 'sandy' to group name.
m. If soil contains", 30% plus No, 200 predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name,
n. PI", 4 and plots on or above "A" line.
o. PI < 4 or plots below "A" line,
p. PI plots on or above "A" line.
q. PI plots below"N' line.
60
50
....... 40
~
)( 30
Cl)
-c
.E
~ 20
:2
7ii
CO
a: 10
7 -
4
00 10 16 20 30 40
DO
WO
MC
LL
PL
PI
P2000
Dry density, pet
Wet density, pet
Natural moisture content, %
Liqiuid limit, %
Plastic limit, %
Plasticity index, %
% passing 200 sieve
50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Liquid Limit (LL)
Laboratory Tests
OC Organic content, %
8 Percent of saturation, %
SG Specific gravity
C Cohesion, psf
o Angle of internal friction
qu Unconfined compressive strength, psf
qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf
Particle Size Identification
Boulders "..,...................,..... over 12"
Cobbles ."..".,.."................" 3"to 12"
Gravel
Coarse ........".................. 3/4" to 3"
Fine ..........".........".......... NO.4 to 3/4"
Sand
Coarse ............."....""..... No. 4to No, 10
Medium ...............,..",...... No. 10 to No. 40
Fine .......... ....., No. 40 to No. 200
Slit ...,......,........"...".,..".......<No. 200, PI< 4 or
below "A" line
Clay.,..................,................ < No. 200, PI., 4 and
on or above' A" Une
Relative Density of
Cohesion less Soils
Very loose ................"......"....... 0 to 4 BPF
Loose ......"................................ 5to 10 BPF
Medium dense ........."......".,.....11 to 30 BPF
Dense ......"...............................31 to 50 BPF
Very dense ..".......,......"............over 50 BPF
Consistency of Cohesive Solis
Verysoft...,...............".........,...., 0 to 1 BPF
80ft .....................".,...."..."...,2103 BPF
Rather soft ................,....,....,...., 4to 5 BPF
Medium ............."....,...........".... 6 to 8 BPF
Rather stiff .....".,....,.......,.......... 9to 12 BPF
Stiff ....,..,......,.........,........."..., 13to 16 BPF
Very stiff ,..,.................."............ 17to 30 BPF
Hard ............."...........".........." over 30 BPF
Drilling Notes
Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3U" or 6U" ID
horlow-stem augers unless noted otherwise, Jetting water was used to
clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs. Standard
penetration test borings are designated by the prefix "Sr (Split Tube).
All samples were taken with the standard 2" OD split-lube sampler. ex-
ceptwhere noted.
Power auger borings were advanced by 4" or 6' diameter continuous-
flight. solid-stem augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were In-
ferred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are, therefore,
somewhat approximate. Power auger borIngs are designated by the
prefix "B."
Hand auger borings were advanced manually with a 1'" or 3(J' diam-
eter auger and were limited to the depth from which the auger could be
manually withdrawn. Hand auger borings are Indicated by the prefix 'H"
BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded In standard penetration
lest, also known as "N" value. The sampler was set 6" into undisturbed
soil below the hollow-stem auger. Driving resistances were then counted
for second and third 6" increments and added to get BPF. Where they
differed significantly, they are reported in the following form: 2/12 for the
second and third 6" increments. respectively.
WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer
and rods alone: driving not required,
WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods
alone; hammer weight and driving not required.
TW indicates thin-walled (undisturbed) tube sample.
Note: All tests were run in generel accordance with applicable ASTM
standards,
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake. MN 55372
Memorandum
DATE: JUL Y 7, 2006
TO: JANE KANSIER
FROM: ROBERT D. HUTCHINS
RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR VILLAGE COMMERCE BUILDING
Following are the results of the site plan review for the Village Commerce building. Our review was
based on the Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) which adopted with amendments the 2000
International Building Code (IBC) with handicap regulations of the Minnesota Accessibility Code
Chapter 1341. Also requirements of the 2003 Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) which adopted with
amendments the 2000 International Fire Code (IFC).
~. Complete a Building Code analysis. mc Chapter 5. Include the following:
a. Occupancy Classification.
b. Type of Construction.
c. Location on Property.
d. Allowable Floor Area.
e. Height and Number of stories.
f. Exiting.
J g. Plumbing fixture count.
2. The building requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the fire department connection. Locate fire
department connection on the West side of building in the Southwest corner.
)3. Provide a Post Indicator Valve (PIV) on sprinkler supply line into buildings. Locate a minimum
distance away the height of the building.
J 4. If provided, indicate means of lawn irrigation. May use separate service and metering for billing
purposes. If wanted, two water meters one for domestic use and one for lawn irrigation can be
utilized. The City requires that there be a curb stop valve that can be accessed by the City for each
www.cityofpriorlake.com
Phone 952.447.4230 I Fax 952.447.4245
individual water meter. Each must have a curb stop valve and separate lines running to each meter
that are located within the building. There is a financial incentive to have separate meters, as the lawn
irrigation meter would not be charged for sewer usage.
Js. Sht L1.I: Accessible parking stalls are required to be 20 feet deep. MSBC 1341.0428 Subpart 6.
4. Sht C I: Provide elevations of accessible ramps at top of ramp and bottom of ramp.
~'
The following are building plan comments:
, 7. Submit signed architecliiral, structura~lans. Submit Signed~~lriiii~
' .. I emergency lighting/exit signs andzP~ ~May be submitte at a a er date.
~'Submit signed a Certificate of Survey. (It/D'cA-r~.... e"v~~.,-
~. Submit a soils report.
..1 o. A Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) determination must be completed by the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services. Contact Roger Janzig at 651.602.1119. Presently, there is a charge of
$4900.00 per SAC unit which is collected at the time of the building permit issuance.
,,{1. Submit Energy Envelope Calculations. MN Energy Code 7670.0100
vf"2. Provide fire extinguishers minimum 2AI0BC rated, within 75 feet travel distance of all areas. IFC
~002.
ubmit the Structural Engineers requirements for Special Inspections IBC 1701.5.
4. Ventilation for the building must meet IBC chapter 12. Provide 15 CFM of ventilation per occupant.
@Separate permits required for tenant finish.
- /
~<y (?)Screen rooftop equipment per City Code 1107.2202 (1) with one of the following methods:
~o~"
a. A parapet wall
b. A fence or screen, the height of which extends at least 1 foot above the top of the
building.
c. The roof equipment shall be painted to match the roof facing material of the building.
@provide detail of lawn sprinkler service stub valve and backflow prevention details.
\f1"8. Provide HDCP signage details.
This is a preliminary review only on the sitelbuilding plans. Other code items will be addressed when
the final plans are submitted. The sitelbuilding plans must be reviewed by the Cities Developmental
Review Committee (DRC) which consists of representatives of Planning, Engineering, Parks, Finance,
and Building Departments. The DRC must approve the site plans before a building permit can be issued.
I
i--C
l-..
NbJ M \"'f ~ f"- S
~ Metropolitan Council
~ly 10, 2006
Environmental Services
Bob Hutchins
Building Official
City of Prior Lake
17073 Adelmann St.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-3968
Dear Mr. Hutchins:
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division has determined SAC for the Village
Commerce Building to be located within the City of Prior Lake.
This project should be charged 8 SAC Units, as determined below. The Council understands this
building is speculative office building.
SAC Units
Charges:
Office (Speculative)
18786 s.f. @ 2400 s.f./SAC
Total Charges:
7.83
7.83 or 8
When the finishing permits are issued, the SAC assignment should be reviewed based on actual usage.
If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1119.
Sincerely,
\W
Roger Janz
Senior Planner
Municipal Services Section
RJ:jn 06071OA4
cc:
S. Selby, MCES
Gordie Schmitz, Greystone Construction Company
,r
Ii, L
(\/ ()rl"
....-c. I" ':
C/\;'
. ,-,I
1
,. I.. O.L)er
f I
~,.,Y ,
I /) /)
,~\ / L.
/ IV" .J
"\)L
"',
... I.
f\
www.metrocouncil.org
. ", J,' I I
'"' ';!.,~~
'1..~! .' I-L.. '
390 Robert Street North. St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 . (651) 602-1005 . Fax (651) 602-1477 . TrY (651) 291-0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
DEMOLITION PERMIT
1. White . File
2. Blue - City
3. Yellow . ApjlIcant
I.
i
Permit No. e I.~q 2 2-
DIRECTIONS
1. DATE
SPACES NUMBERED 1 THRU 10 MUST B FILLED IN
BEFORE PERMIT ISSUED
(Please print or type and sign at bottom).
RESS
\c.:.tb ~
3. LEGAL DE RIPTlON
2. S
f~A+J ~urJ T i2-
S.c.
PID 'L S .. 1 V 2 "" 0 't '3 - 0
RNGo"2..2- 1>e~2.tPTloN
10. COMPLETION DATE
LOT
BLOCK
ADDITION S€-c:.-r. '2.. TWi?'1 \4
4. OWN (ame)
TOM I~O ~Sc..H
5. ARCHITECT (Name)
(Address)
li~.~~ MA~~
(Address)
, (Tel. No.)
.....$F--DcfW <{~{""3"'Z..-
(Tel. No.)
6. CONTRACTC>>R (Name)
(Address)
(Tel. No.)
I hereby certify I have furnished information which is to the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certify that I am the
owner or authorized agent for the above mentioned property and that all construction will conform to all existing state and local laws
and will proceed in accordance with submitted plans. I am aware that the building official can revoke this permit for just cause.
Furthermore. I hereby ~ee that the city official or a designee may enter upon the property t per rm needed inspections.
x ~}~ z.~ 0
.r Signature ate
FOR ADMINISTRA TlVE USE
METRO SAC UNIT DETERMINATION SAc... UN (i
MATERIAL FilED WITH APPLICATION
l500()OOL . O. C;. IS WAIV!EO
('] Site Restoration Plan
o Utility Abandonment Plan
o SeW9f' Abandonment
USE OF BUILDING
SITE RESTORATION PLAN
o Water Abandonment
Accepted by
Rejected by
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II III IV 0
Occupancy Group A (y E H R M
Division 2 3 4
o Electrical Abandonment
o Other
CREDITS
Park Oed. Credit ................................................ $
SAC Credit ......................................................... $
Sewer & Water Connec. Fee Credit .................. $
Water Tower Fee Credit .....................................$
~sQ'-
trc;o
/2-t:O -
lOQ-
t !
i I
'2/'20/01
, I
Other .... ....... ......................................... .............. $
TOTAL CREDITS ........................ $ '3~ ov ~
Issued by
Date
t in the above and aocompanying documents is in aocordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and
7. -7..0 ~O r
Date
Special Conditions if any
THE DAMA CO.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
KEY LOCK BOX
AUTHORIZATION AND ORDER FORM
I PL~EASE READ
ORDERING INFORMATION:
1) This order must be signed with the signature of the
authorized Fire Department official on file with the DAMA CO.
2) The key box will be shipped to you without any keys and will
be locked in the open position Contact your local Fire
Department for specific mounting requirements.
3) Please include 6.5% Minnesota sales tax and shipping charge.
4) Full payment must accompany order. Make check payable to THE DAMA CO.
5) Allow 1-2 weeks for delivery.
CUSTOMER INFORMATION
SHIP TO:
(DO NOT USE A P.O. BOX)
Company
Address
City/St/Zip
Attention of:
--------------~---
ORDERED BY: DATE: t::t 1..- O~
Company G (Zef G ~6 ~^?~ Co .
Address S;co S. MA~c:- (4) ~
City/St/Zip ~~~ P6&1 M.,u 5S31h
. '1 z.-....
Name & Ph # O:vft.l>t€r ~ t11-rz..~~z..L-1-1
FIRE DEPARTMENT INFORMATION
NAME:
PRIOR LAKE FIRE DEPT.
AUTHORIZED FIRE DEPT. SIGNATURE
ORDERS WILL NOT BE PROC SSED WITHOUT
AUTHOR I D F.D. S AT E
INSTALLATION ADDRESS
- REQUIRED BY FIRE DEPT.
- ATTACH LIST IF MORE ROOM IS NEEDED
41L.Pt p~ 1',1\ COL-L..c-T AJe S.~.
Y~oC2- ~. M~ ~s'3.TZ-
MAIL TO:
ORDER FORM - Payment must be submitted with order
S2-SURFACE MOUNT (NO MTG KIT OPTION AVAilABLE) $107.00
S3-SURFACE MOUNT $ 131.00
S3-SURFACE MOUNT W{TAMPER SWITCHES $168.00
R3-RECESSED MOUNT $ 160.00
R3-RECESSEO MOUNT W{T AMPER SWITCH $186.00
MOUNTING KIT (OPTIONAL FOR S-3 & R-3 MODELS ONLY) $ 59.00
SUB TOTAL
SHIPPING & PROCESSING CHG. $9.00
SUB TOTAL WITH SHIPPING CHG.
MINNESOTA SALES TAX, 6.5%
TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED
ITEM
White & Yellow Copy - DAM A CO
QTY
DAMA-MP INC.
P.O. BOX 47824
PLYMOUTH, MINN.
55447
PRICE
TOTAL
DARRYL SUNDBERG
763-559-3660
Pinl' Copy - Customer
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 EAGLE CREEK AVENUE S.E.
PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372
SPECIAL STRUCTURAL TESTING AND INSPECTION SCHEDULE
Project Name \JILL""'': CommEttc..l: SUILOu-.lG
Location
~~l-O~ LA.+-.E MN
SPECIAL STRUCTURAL TESTING AND INSPECTION
Specification
Section Article
Description
Type of Inspector (3)
Report Frequency
Assigned
Firm (4)
Notes: This schedule to be filled out and included in the project specification. Information unavailable at
that time, to be filled out when applying for a building permit.
(I) Use descriptions per~Section 1701, as adopted by Minnesota State Building Code.
(2) Special Inspector - 1etmiical, Special Inspector - Strucural.
(3) Firm contracted to perform services.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Each appro
Owner:
Contracto :
Architect.
SER:
SI-S:
TA:
SI-T:
TA:
SI-T:
F:
F:
shall be
Legend: SER = Structural Engineer of Record
Sl-T = Special Inspector - Technical
SI-S = Special Inspector - Struct ral
T A = Testing Agency
F = Fabricator
I
{i::
Accepted for the Building Department by
Date
_u--,"'
-
-----
T U S H I E
MONTGOMERY
ARC HI T E CTS
7645 l YNOAlE AVENUE SOUTH, "00
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55423-4084
612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 861 .9632
WWW . ll,lIARCHITECTS . COM
~
U
~ ~
~ E-<
0
:::E 0 en
I:LI
::E Z z
z
0 ~ 58
U Q
~ I:LI
~ ~
l:Ll ~ ~
.....:l
0 (:0 0::
<:r: 0
........
~ 0::
~ P-,
~
>
Prepol"'.d For-,
GHE.fSTONE
""""'"""-
lnl tdtfllUlmloWDlllllUITf; II'
_....."
""'11S2)......D17 rA1l!(IUl~1t1
r -f
I~I I~I
.
LSJol)I:Ol-a74A
U LSENGINEERS
2IDOS.......st.
,-, ... --... .... ~
.fIIlIIUlIIIWY........e== ,[:ff':t::--
.
I HEREBY CERTIFY TH.\T THIS PLAN,
SP(CIFlCA.TION, OR REPORT WAS PRE-
P....RED "' "' OR UNDER II'f DIRECT
SUPEIMSION AND ~T , AM A DULY
LICENSED PROf'ESSIOIW.. ENGINEER UNOER '"'
LAWS Of THE STATE OF IIIINNESOTA.
PRINT NAME: Brion J. Sollo,
SIGNAlURE:
(),t.1[; ~UCENSE':~
.
Dote &-2-06
Drown By MLII:
Checked By B..J5
Project Engineer B..J5
Project Number 2~"
Revisions c!c Addendum' s
I VILLA6e GaMMI90CE euILDIN6
STRUCTURAL NOTES
S4 1
. j; ~O~6 -''-''11IP' \lO_~r::;O~;:RY ~ E~IJDE,. I~:
GENERAL
1, NOTES AND DETAILS ON THE STltUCTURAl. ORAWIrIGS TAKE I'Il(CEDENCE CM:R THESI: STNrII>>.RD
STRUCTURAlNOfES.
2. All lMTERW. AND WCllllCWoNSHP SIWJ. CONFOflU TO THE R[QUlRElIlDITS OF THE fOLLOWJjG
COocs.SPECtrK:AlllN5.ANOOfS.CN1MM.W.(lATtSl~\lNLESSICTED):
o. 2000 lNTERNAl'DW. BUlDlNC COO( (8:) WITH IlIIhNESOTA AMOfOYENl'S
b. .wERCAH CONCROE INSTITUTE (ACO
c, CONCIlEl! RElNfOllClNC STEEL INSTITUTE (CIlSI) ltWrll..W. Of STANtwm PRACTCE (fOR
PlJClNC II DETAlLN: Of AU. RE/NftlfiClNC)
d.AWE:R!C:ANlNSlTTUTEOfSTEElCONSTRt.ll:TOl(Alsc)
e. AWfR!C:AN WELDIN(; socrn (AirS) STAIOROS fOIt WELDlNC AS WOllIff:D BY A.LS.C. $PEC.
I. STEELJ05TINSTlTUTE{SJI)
9. STEELDE'ClC INSTlTUTE(SOI)
~. AWERlCAN IRON II SlIEl I6TITUTE {AISl) COI.D-fORYED STEEL OCSICN ~
;. STATE AND fIDERAl. OCCUPATllfrW. WEIY ~ HEALTH AOlOr/ISTIfAJlOtrl (OSK\)
REQUlROIEHTS
1 REFIR ro SPEClfl'.AOONS fOR N"ORIMTION NOT CCM;R(O BY TH[S( t<<)'fES OR DflAWINCS.
4. THE CONlWCTOR StWl. VERIfY AU. DIMENSIONS. ElEYATKlNS, AND SITE CONDITIONS 8EFORf:
STARTWC WORk: AND THE ENGIII:R/NlCtfTECT StWl. aE IlAIECMffiV NOTlFlED, IN WRITING,
Of AN'( Dl5CREPAHCfi
5. INr<<:lCASESIW.J.0IlENS1ONSIlESCAl.EOFIIOUPlANS,SECTIONS,ORDE1AlLSONTHE
S11l""""'-""""""-
6,1YF'lCAL.llUAlLSSlW..LfJ[l)S[DWIOf:VERAPPlCA8lE.
7, ALL OWlSSIONS AND COtflClS flOWEEN THE VNlWS ELOIENTS Of THE DRAWINGS NKJ/OR
SPECflCATKlNS SIW.J. BE BIQ.lGHT TO TtI: ATTEJrm)N OF, AM) RESOl.:'f'ED WITH THE
[NC1NEER/ARCttTECT BEFORE PllXEEDING WITH AWf WORK SO IIMllVED.
8. THECONTRACTORSl-W.LOCTERWlMETHElOCA~OFUTlUTYSElMCESINTHEAREArollE
EXCAVATED BEFORE IlEGNK EXCAVATKlN.
9. IfJ P1PfS, DUCTSi, SL.EMS, ~S, Eft.. 9W..L BE PlACro IN SLABS OR WAlLS, t<<lR
SlW.I. NIt STRUCTURAl. IilEMBER BE CUT FllR PIPES. OUCTS, Eft.
10_ RECESSB, DE:PRESSDI5, DIWOtSI'JtrIS, ELE\lAroNS, OPENIlrCS, EQlJlPW[NT SlJPIlORTS, AND
DETAlLSSKALLBEVEllIflmIl'l'REFERENCETONr.:HTECTlJRAl.lIEOWrIlCAl,ANDELfCTllCAL
OAAWIlGS,OPENlNGS, REQUIRED BUT NOT SHOWN, YUSTBE PI.JCED BETWEEN STIlUCTUIW.
"'I"""
11,TEWPlllWrYeRN;JN;:
o. PROVIDE TEYPOlWlY LATERAl. SUPPORT fOR AU. 'IWl.S WHERE GIlADE VARIES ON THE
TWO SIDES UNTl. PERW.NOO STRUCTURAl. SI.lPPOIfT SYSTE\l1S IN Pl.ACE.
b. PROYIO(TEYI'OIWn'IlIW:INC FOAAU. BlJll..OlN>EL.OlENTSMDCOIlIPONEHTS l..'rITll. THE
STRUCfURE IS Sl.JfTK:IOOlV COWPl..ETE TO PR<NlO[ PEllIMNOO 8IW:lNG.
DESIGN DATA
,. WlNDl.(w)
2. ROOf"lJV[LlWlS
iOW.p.H.EXPOSLJR[e
GROUND SHOW UW)
IWPORTANCrfAClOA
EXf'OSUR(fACTQfl
THERW.Lf.M::10R
.P4J,,511P.S.F.
.1,,1.0
.......Ce-Ul
...Ct"l.D
J, f1.OORLNELOAOS:
o. m>cAL FlOORS . . . . . . . . , . 100 P.S.F.
c. SlAIRSIlCORRIOOR l00P.5.F,
FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS
1. NETAI.LOWAfILE SOl. 8tARtIG PRESSURE:
o. fp..JOOOpIf
2. fOOTJ/GS, fOl.JNC>>.OONS AM) OllER ITE'IilS RELATED TO THE SOlS gw,L BE CONSTRUCTED IN
ACCORl)lHCEWlTHTH(RECOW~lklNSlNlHESOlLSREPORT.
J. THE NET AL.1.OlWIlE SOIL BENlINC PftESSl.Ilft: sw.u. BE fUD VERIfIED lJI' SOLS ENGINEER
PIttOII: TO PI.ACINC fOOntrlGS.
4. AU. SIlt SOl WORK StW.l BE DClNE UNDER THE DlIlECT oes~OON Of A SOlS EPGNEER.
5, 'fM.TEA lMlS INOlCATED ON BOllI<<: lOCS ARE SUllJECT TO SfASOIrW. IMO/OR ANNL.W.
V~OONS..FNE~ADEWAlERtrlGSVS'I"EWOfSUFFIClENTCAPIOTYSI-W.l.IlE
I6lAillD ANI) OPERAlED TO lMINTAlN THE CONS1'RUCT1ON AREA fREE Of WAlER AT ALl
11M"-
6. W1NIWUU DD'TH FROM EXTEIl()R CRAll( TO IIOTIOlIl OF FOOTl(; N01 AO.W:OO TO HEAlED
SPACE SHAll BE 60 tOiES,
7, PROTECT FOUNDATION EXCAVAOONS FROM fROST: 00 t<<)T Pl.ACE CONCRET( ON FROZEN
G"""'-
a. f()l.ltO.OON EXCoWATONS SHAll BE 1((f'T FREE OF lOOSE lMTERW. ANO SlANOlNG WATER
ANO StW.L. BE CH(Cl(fI)ANDN'PIlCMD BY THE SOILS ENGINEER BEFORE THE Pl.ACElIENTOF
AHf CONCRET(,
9 WAU. fOOTINGS ARE CONTINLXlUS POURED CONCRETE wrrH CONTINUOUS REINFORCING I'IJ.CED
J"ClEAR OF IIOTTOlIl ANO SlOES.
'O.1'ROVI0E:24CM.lAPATSPUCESANOflJU.CROSSI<<:;W'ATCORNERSANOlNl[RSECTIONS.
, 1. UNlESS OTHERWISE NOTED, IIAU fOOTllGS ARE CENTEREI) UNDER WAl.LS ANI) COUNN
fOOTlNCS UNOER COL.lfYNS.
12. FOOTINGS FOR 'IWl.S N01 NOTED SI-WJ. BE 12" THICK WITH A WINIWLN PROJECTQf or 4"
EACHSlDEWlTH2-f5COfr/11r1lJOl.1
lJ. BOTH SlOES Of FOUlrrj[",TOI M1S StW.l II( e,tCKFll..LED S1WOlTANEOUSLV SO AS 10
PREVENT CNERTUlMlC OR LATERAl. WlM\IENT OF WAlLS.
REINFORCING STEEL
1. COfCRET( WOIlK StWl. roNfOllW TO AU. REOUIRDIO(IS OF /ID JIll (LATEST EDITOl)
"SPEtIf'CATlONSfOItSTRl.CTlJlW..CON::RUEFORllJILDINGS.,EXCEf'TASlIIXlIflEDlJI'THESE
."'S.
2. NREINFORCOlOOSIW.I.BE:ASl\l.l615,CRAIJ[6Q
J. WELDED WIRE FABRe SI-W.l. MEET ASTW 1.'85.
4, CONTRACTOR SHAl.l SUBWIl REIIrlFOfI:HG STEEL SHOP DAAWINGS fOR APf'IlOYAl. BEFORE
FABRlCAlIllM AHO INSTAl.LAOON.
5. ALLREINfORClNCSTEELANCtClR8OlTS.llllWELS.ANOlNSERTSSI-WJ.fl(SEctJREDIN
I'OSI1l)N WITH WIRE POSlTONERS BEFORE I'IJ.CING CONCIlETE OR CROUT.
6. DOWELS Il(JW[[N FOOTINGS AM) WAUS SI-WJ. BE THE SWE GIlADE. SIZE. ANO SPAClN(; AS
VER1l:Al.WAL.lREN"ORCIN(;.
7. WMlIll lAP SPtCES OF REINfORCING lWlS StW.l. BE AS FOlLOWS UNLESS IfJTED
OTHERWISE:
0. COIrCRETE: CLASS BAS OUJ€D IN N:;1 J18-99 OR CIMT BUOI.
!
~
"
~
f
l
t
~
~'
~
I
f
~
i
COI<<:R[T[ IlEIlfOIDI: lAP SPLCE UllCD6
BAA lAP""''" W LENGTH
(J/4. CLR.) (2. CLR.)
50' (INCHES) (INCHES)
I' 17 17
,. " 2J
15 " "
,. ,. "
" 90 ..
18 ", ,.
,. '" ..
I" '" ..
'" 190 ,,,
8. RElNrORClNCSlEELSlW.l.BEPRO<<lEDWlTH1HEFOL.l.C1lWINGAWOUNTSOfCCNERFllR
CAST-IN-PlACE CONCROE:
o.COlrrCRETEI'l.ACEDN::MISTEARTH J.
b.CQIr,Cft(T[SURFACE(FtlRlIED):
i.I6lHROUGt11181WlS 2.
.. 15 IINlIMO sw.uER. 1-1/2.
.. snRllUPS I: llES . 1-1/2.
.cNRYCONS1ROCTION
NGINEERED MASONRY CONSTRUCTION - LEVEL 1
NONESSENTIAL FACILITIES
~ ~ .~ S ~
INSPECTION TASK S ~~ ~~ ~i
~ ~ ~" lI!"
.s IMSOJIR'( alNSlRUCOON 8(GINS, THE
Ol.LDWINC Sl-W.lBE VERRD 10 ENSlJR[
:owPt.WiCE:
'. pROPORlQIS Of SIT[-PREPARED IiIORTAIl X TA " ::~
I. CONSTllUCTaI OF WORTAR JOINTS X TA " ~~
.. tOCATaI OF REINl'llAl::EWOO AND CONrIECTORS. X TA " ~~
H(INSPECllON~Sl-W.l.VERlfY'
.SIlEANIllOCAllONOF"S1JlOClURAl.EL[\l[HTS, X TA " ~
.1'I'I'E.SllEANOlllCAllONOF"ANCHllRS, X TA " ::~
INCLUDIf(:OTHER OET.HLSOfAhCHOlW:E Of
~ER~lIIOotlIER5,FW.I[S
. SPE:Clf"{D SIZE, GlWlEANOlYPEOf X TA 8l1~~
"""""""".
PROTECTIONOF~IlYIJURINGCOlD X TA BlI~~
:::: ===:: :~. DR f1JT
RIOATOGROUTING,THEF"OllOWINGSl-W.l9E
ERlFlEDTOEMSURECOtiIP\.W(;E
Cl.fAhUeS OF CROUT S~. X TA " ~~
PlACEMENT Of REN"ORCE\l(1lT AND X TA " ~
"",",ClOllS.
PROf'ORTOIS OF SITE-PIlEPARED CROUT. X TA " ~r
CONSTRUCTlON Of lOITARJOINTS, x TA " ~
~Pl.ACOlENTSHAl.l.9EVEAIfl[DTOENSURE X TA " ~~
JI.lPlWCE WITH COOE AND CONSlRLlCOON
:JCUlIENTI'ROIISIONS,
""""""" E-ENGIrI(ER'sSPEtw.INSPECTOR
PEcw. INSPECTOR STRI.lCT1JIW.
;:~JN INTERTEC
--~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transm ittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Braun Intertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
Date: October 19,2006
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
Cit)' of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
-L For your records
For review
Information Sent
Concrete Tests
Street Utilities - Densities
Reference Numbers
Sets I through 3 & 5 through 7
Tests I through 5
Comm ents/Clarification
Reports Dated 10/18/06
Tests Taken 10/3/06 through 10/5/06
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins, City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz, Greystone Construction Company. Inc
Brian Salter, LS Engineers
Andy Krenik. Tushie Montgomery & Associates,lnc.
I Information Sent
Concrete Tests (I ), Street Utilities - Densities ( I )
Concrete Tests (I), Street Utilities - Densities (I)
Concrete Tests (I), Street Utilities - Densities (I)
Concrete Tests (I), Street Utilities - Densities (I)
"....:...1
,..t
.~
.~
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan P. Kolle
952-469-3644
ReI'. 8. '6 0./
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 10/18/06
Work Order: 6015970
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Gridline 2 to 3 - D
Sample Location/Notes: cylinders cast by the client no information given
1
10/3/06
3:04 pm
10/4/06
3
1.0
70
75
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
222
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
1-1 1 6 7 60860 4.00 12.57 4,840 C
Capping
Method *
N
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
Break Remarks: D2
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~00[]]
ABC D E
Cooe Cone Cone Shear CokJmruar
8: &
Split Shear
~~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 10/18/06
Work Order: 6015971
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, ~
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. COF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline A - 4,5, and 6
Sample Location/Notes: cylinders cast by the client no information given
2
10/3/06
3:07 pm
10/4/06
3
2.0
70
75
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
225
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
2-1 1 6 7 53560 4.00 12.57 4,260 D
Capping
Method *
N
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
Break Remarks: D2
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[J00[]]
ABC D E
Cooe Cone Cone Shear CoJumnar
& &
Split Shear
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 10/18/06
Work Order: 6016090
Client:
Gordie Sclunitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (DF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline D - 2 and 3
Sample LocationINotes: cylinders were cast by client no information given
3
10/4/06
3:28 pm
10/5/06
3
2.0
70
65
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
225
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
3-1 1 6 7 51840 4.00 12.57 4,130 D
Capping Remarks
Method * Code(s)
N D2
Break Remarks: D2
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, UnbondedCaps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[g0[][]]
ABC D E
Cooe Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Split Shear
fJ!N~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 10/18/06
Work Order: 6016315
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (OF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing, Elevator / Stairwell footings
Sample Location/Notes: cylinders cast by client no information given
5
10/6/06
1 :46 pm
10/9/06
01/4
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
o
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
5-1 3 4 7 49310 4.00 12.57 3,920 D
Capping
Method *
N
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
Break Remarks: D2
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~[J00[]]
ABC D E
Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Split Shear
&-~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 10/18/06
Work Order: 6016317
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. eF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. eF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Interior, Pier, Gridline B - 3,4, and 5
Sample Location/Notes: cylinders cast by client no information given
6
10/6/06
1:50 pm
10/9/06
01/4
0.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
4000
AVR
Not Required
4000
1
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
6-1 3 4 7 58060 4.00 12.57 4,620 D
Capping Remarks
Method * Code(s)
N D2
Break Remarks: D2
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
~~00[]]
ABC 0 E
COf1e Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &
Split Shear
aN~~
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder
Test Method: ASTM C39, 4x8 Cylinder
Report Date: 10/18/06
Work Order: 6016571
Client:
Gordie Schmitz
Greystone Construction Company, Inc
500 S Marschall Road
Suite 300
Shakopee,~ 55379
Project: BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, MN
Field Test Conditions and Results
Set Number:
Date Cast:
Time Cast:
Date Received:
Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143)
Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231)
Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064)
Air Temp. (OF):
Liquid Added On Site: None
Pour Location: Building Exterior, Footing, Gridline 7.3 to 8.4 - A
Sample LocationINotes: cylinders were cast by client, no information given
7
10/9/06
11:31 am
10/11/06
01/4
1.0
50
50
Mix Design:
Supplier:
Specified Air (%):
Specified Strength (psi):
Truck Number:
Ticket Number:
Cylinders per Set:
Cylinders Cast By:
3000
AVR
Not Required
3000
1
I
3
Anderson, Robert D
Compression Test Results
Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder
Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture
Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type
7-1 2 5 7 61040 4.00 12.57 4,860 D
Capping
Method *
N
Remarks
Code(s)
D2
Break Remarks: D2
* Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, UnbondedCaps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps
The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength.
TYPES OF FRACTURE
[2;J 0[]]
ABC D E
Corle Cone Cone Shear Columnar
& &.
Split Shear
~i!4M,
\0
<=>
---
l'
-
---
<=>
-
..
...
..
~
1::
c
c.
~
~
M
M
Q'\
",M
i~
E-;~
=E-;
.S ~
'tJ<
['g
e-=
0-
u ~
'O~
--
.~ ~
~E-;
Z
:I
C
III
..
u
u.J
.-
0:::
u.J
I-
Z
~ M ~
"1:l '" \0
&l 'S \0
u:5~
"O~N
ta '" N
"0 I'l 00
&l .., <"'of
u:50
E
..,
J 8 ~
~
...
~
Q)
"0 0
o M
~ ~
...
..,
.., x
~ 0
~ ?:
0\
<')
-0
os
o
~
0Il€
.5 ;:l
-0 0
:::::u
&l~
8"g
<~~~
~~~ar
~ 9 ~ .~ ~
.~ ~ ~ ~ -:
f j :::: ~ .g
~~>p..p..
o
s::
-
~
0-
S
o
u
s::
.g ~ 0\
00 l'
g~ ~
~~ z
u ~ :::E
II) ~ <=> ar
13 :::E <=> II)
.;.:..... M c..
5 ~rn II) ~
:= e 0 .1::: -Cd
UO~~~
~
~
1l ~ s
'B J 'i:5
.., os
~. e-
o
u
s::
Q) .g
.:: t) ~
td [~
~2'-'
u
c'?
0.9
~ .g
a: S
..so
-~ ~
~.~ ~
..s~
... E
.., ..,0
1d ~ u
~8.,e.
- .go
.., a u
~"'.9
o
~~
~ s s
'r; 0 0
. i3 E-< E-<
il -tJ" ~
.., 0 0
E-,E)~
"0 '" '"
v g g
~....l....l
000
t:: t:: t::
.., .., ..,
.0.0.0
000
~~~
s::" s::" l:f
~ ~ ~
... ... ...
.., .., ..,
"0 "0 "0
~ ~ ~
o
>-<
E
~ e
O'i ~
II
oq-oq-oq-oq-oq-
tr'lVlIOtr'llrl
00000
C"""'l ("t') C"'f"l C1"'J t"")
NNNNN
..,g
~-B~~~~~
~ ~
o
~~
o ..,
~~
~~
E-<
E-<E-<E-<E-<E-<
OOOOCl
E;;:;
~~
8~
~~<<<
V) 00 1Ol(") I,(')
~~~~~
("t') \00\ tr'lt-
~~~~~
~~~::!:~
~"""""".....-I .......
~O\::~~
~o~oo
~~~~:t
00000
I.ONNoOO
~~~~~
8.......N---
~crctcrcrcr
~p..p..p..p..p..
\0 \0 \0 \0 \0
~~~!=2~Q
Q~~~~~
.......................... .......
-
~....
~o
-
'"
~-NMVv)
I'l
.s
.;3
s
~ ~
~ ~
_<Il
e~
~
OaJ
II /I
f-<<Il
OaJ
E
'" 0
.~ .ia
l1<E
g'E &
.~ ~~
'E :E .~
8. ~ .~
'" ;>.. ..
oS is. oS
.~ ~ .~
;>.. u ;>..
15..~-
S g ~
000
u." u
~~~
'" '" '"
" .., "
... ... ...
ti ti ti
" .., "
..f-<f-<f-<
to /I /I /I
~<aJU
c
Clo
-g-.e, ~ l'
....l~ ~ ~
~ .~ >-< >-<
.~ Q
~
~~ N \C!
.~ ~ s:! M
c:>..'-
o~
I'l
0
.~ ~
u U C/)
~ C/) I
'" p..
gj C/)
0
8 >-< N
>-< 0 0
I I
'S p.. P-
C/)
t
dt
s::
.9 oo::t t- v 00
'tU\O\O\OV)
i)~"'~~
~
..,
u
~
~
~
d
o
.~
;-
..,
~
s::
.~
P-
.t:
~i"7
o .... .....
.~ 0.....
u s:l"O
j ;q S
... ...
~ ~...
r/i .~ ~ ~
~~ ~C/)
.~ ~.~ ~
C/)~r:I)v.i
ssss
~~~~
.~1111
gE-E-E-E-
:: g g .E' g
'" ..;::l ..;::l '3 '.;::l
~oooo
8
t;-M('1')"Il::t
..,
E-<
bIl bIl
.s .s
.~ .~
.., ..,
.s .s
.... ....
o 0
.., ..,
v. 0
>-< M
~1 ~ ~
E-< ?:
.... .S ~ .S ~
-~ i ij i ij
~~~~~
'"
<r>
~
~
..,
r:I)
~
o
u:5
;3
~
-B
s:l
..,
...
E-
~
:5
<r>
....
c:
Q)
E
:J
(.)
..r:::O
0."0
3lQ)w
0=0
'Q)O
"> N
::s10,....
~ Ci~
.~ g. t5
Z_O
....
o
..,
gp
p..
"0
~
G)
Z
.<::
c:>..
..,
'"
o
.....,
~
..,
.t:
p.,
o
...
p..
"0
ij
]
i:l
..,
"0
0.;::
~
o
U
.,...
~
...;
..,
>
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Date: October 20, 2006
Braun Intertec Project No: BL-05-04456A
Transmittal No:
2
Braun Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Way
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To: Robert Dana Hutchins
Cit)' of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: 952.447.4230
Fax: 952.447.4245
Re: Village Commerce Building, Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39, Prior Lake, MN
This Transmittal is being Sent:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
---X- For your records
For review
Information Sent
Street Utilities - Densities
Reference Numbers
Test 6
Comm ents/Clarification
Test Taken 10/16/06
I Transmittal List
Robert Dana Hutchins, City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz, Greystone Construction Company, Inc
Brian Salfer, LS Engineers
Andy Krenik, Tushie Montgomery & Associates,Inc.
I Information Sent
Street Utilities - Densities (1)
Street Utilities - Densities (1)
Street Utilities - Densities (1)
Street Utilities - Densities (1)
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan P. Kolle
952-469-3644
Rev. 8604
. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957
\0
!:2
0\
-
--
o
-
G;
....
<<l
t:l
1:
Q
Cl.
<II
~
N
N
Q\
",N
~~
~~
=E-o
Orn
tl<
CQ't:l
Cl..o
60S
o ~
U~
't:l....
- '"
~ ~
ri:E-o
,- .11
'E ~
cd B 0'<
-g .~ ~
<0 0
cil:::S
]
-g
cd
cil
o~
.~ ~
...
Cl
E
e
E
'"
.5
3
cd
....
co
"""
on
9 g
N
0;0
"<:l '"
o """
:::s'"
I
....
...
... ><
~J.eJ
0\
M
]
~
~
~.....
I': 3
:e 0
==u
&l~
0"0
~~~
<Co~
\08t)
II) E _ .
""" 0 - 0
"""u87J
....90z.....l
CJII) ~ ...
<IIO<ll~o
.... I _ ...._
E.....l== <<lA:
l:l.cco:>p..
o
..s
~
a
0-
8
o
U
I':
o "0 0'\
.- <II f'
~~ ~
~~ A
a -5 ~
u '" .
o a 0 0
I': ~o 0
...9 M go
=~tZl.s~
<II 0 0._ ;'i!
.-"'0 ::1_
UOlI)tZltZl
'"
c
o
g ..a
.- U
~!-5
~ t.;::: ~
o"u ~
.~ & ~
(,,) ~ ~
t.;:i .r: 0
'0 .-::: >
8. ~ ..!.
'" ;;....a
l5...r:
-5 e .<;::
.~ 0 ~
;;...U;;...
0.00..
g ; 8
u "0 u
.'!l.'!l~
1l ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ij ~
E-E-E-
'iii io=, II II II
~\O~~eou
9
I:: E
::l <l)
<0 E
en ~
.s
Q)~
2~~
~C:l
<l) ;;;
"<:l ...
O~f-o
:::s ... 0
tIl ~
...~
f-o
"'~
E ;;...
... ~ '"
e - .....
e ~
o~
U
~
~
1l~s",
s e '<3 0'<
~ :5 II
~:::s g
u
I::
... ..8 ~ """
.2: ~ '$. 0'\
Cd Q..__
~ g
u
c'tl
O~co
~.~ ~
c:: ~
.so
<l) ~
]~~oo
~ '0
.E:E
E 0
t...'Uo\
"Cd'E.e
~8
.gc ~
;E ~ 8.. :::
?<l)~
o
'iii
.......
....0
~
Cl
a ]
'u 0
'a ~
-5 d'
OJ ~
f-o ...
"" ""
0:; I::
~ <:
9 8
'0 ~
CIl
\0
o
<l) \D
1;j -
o 0
-
c
Oc
~ & l--;
.....l~~
;;...-
e.t:: _
S ~
.~ Cl
:::s
J
&
~
'"
o
'"
N
~
E "... _
E B :!
.- '"
.... .-
0.. 0
o~
I::
.S:
1;j
t)
r.;:::
.;;;
~
o
~
CIl
I
~
CIl
9 8
'0 ~
CIl
,- I::I I
0
.~ co
0'<
>
...
@
....
...
~
<l) 0
g 0
~ -
~ ~
~ g
I:: c;::
o "<:l
.~ C1J
> 7;i
... '2
@ r.;:::
c
.~
'"
e ..
~ ~
E- u
_CIl
.~ ~
Cleo
II I!
E-CIl
Cleo
I::
o
:~
....
t) co
'"
<l)
o <:
I:: '!)
~ .5
.~ :g
t) ....
.3 Cl
0;
~
....
.S:
....
...
s
s:: _
o [;
H
... ....
f-o CIl
9
L ~I\OJ
c
w
E
::l
o
.cO
a."C
5l ~ IDo
0_
'wO
->(\1
"COOl
(i),-.,.....
~ ~o
z~o
....
o
~
cd
~
"<:l
;B
~
z
-a
...
'"
o
......
~
...
.~
8
~
"<:l
a
]
E
...
"<:l
r.;:::
s::
o
U
""!
N
..;
...
:>
BRAUN'N
INTERTEC
SpeciallMpedor Dally Report
r-_
-~{ ~ .. r~ L<-, ~
Page
of
City of
Report Number:
. Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
$\ -::{ :5" '1\ ..s
\( t \\l"rl~' (r "jA~,C~
~~-y'lL2 .r- 'Tf<<. \ ~. Jl
~ (.f'-/<:-lC~
(
( l(~\S
Date of This Report: \ 0 - ~ -v b
BCV6-Project No.: ~ -...:>) - 0'-1'-((.-( -A
c . / I ( 0 '\~ + ..../lvf" !
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
,
I
i
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry Rebar Placement td' Foundations
o Welding Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Boltin Tendon Placement 0 Other
Did the architect or ineer authorize chan es to c' roved. lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Description and I~ of wort completed: ~(!-""I c.nJ' f'r.;fcr ---<' r) c= K "cr, +,; ~
, 2\0--., ,0";-1 -I ;_;, U^ -L-t'5 '> "lev..!'" Q; :s,.., \ 5- -C C '_6vt>)L ..( ~ <; r~, I
~ S. fe't: <:". \... (" c~-.i. '-+ f '- p. \ 5' f>- ~'"' ~
f( "'.G r \" G (C>..eJ) j S-[\ f .-" .....~. 0 -( r ~ r \ c (2v (e.-C..., 0 -"t/( r . I +[l'-f.
J
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
,Ef Periodic
c~ \(:. ~ 'v("
-("r
e,,-f
\ r -1'-(" (. '-' ____ (
y e "....
U.,'",-
11'"\ (L 'G{
i: (' Y" ~ _f +. ~;.,...... r:-.
Cc '"'>/
\ ou.!.f--~ p. J C>l {"",c;L:-t C( ~~
{ -.IFf/
\ c (S~
.-:- . \
;;J ti ,
,."
....
List tests performed:
......
.
i
1\
i
Are therJ~Y'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the...UBC. except as noted above. ;
'-"'/ ()
Signed: .b;_lf.-.w_0J~
Print Full Name: ~~ Ar-,J4, {(,.,-.
Date: -10-...)1 -0 h
\~S7
I. D. Number:
:.', ...
(While copy to Braun Inlertec file. Blue copy to General Conrractnr.)
iml\spo:ciDlifl.4 112..';/95
BRAUNSM
INTERTEC
SpedallDspec:tor Daily Report
Page
of
." )
City of J.o.;- <.co ).('1 i ( <..-
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
jJ.~ 1\_ ._1' ,..
l.......J t"e 0",( Date of This Report: 1<:":;; -.-../ (-(/' i..
"- ( .\ \ r.~ I r (r 1'~r-r: i ~ ~ Bi.96. Project No.: pi -~..).~ c..:;t f'1 - ( ;.
->. f\L/ (
-'6-,.-.1..(\.--- l"a,.\ r_' \.....A< r..r'(~!..+ ~,jF
-_ /r \, ....<::+,. r r Client Project No.:
C I U 'f ( l~ Temperature:
.....)
f~
1 "
\_ Jr, \"\
~. 1
'0 ..r
Type of Inspection:
g.,. Continuous
...-JS:.J Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Wdding
o Boltin
.~ Rebar Placement 0 Foundations
o Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Tendon Placement 0 Other
roved laos? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Did the architect or
Description and location of work completed: (? c;,-t. (.". (" C P
O. .. r.s. C", ( -* ((". 1--.::- '-1:. I L ~ \.Jf-
(,I' 'v'Y./
l N>P;" (' ~ ! ~ ('..~
"
c~
*
-i-- +4.- /
" - "-I. I .f.'
A\ . c,. ('
{-\tn.::;l c/'.( ~ ';'t.-((.- Fr0 'I -
6-J
{ .
t:1+( > 0 {; (, (\ \ \~c
, ? -.. f"7( -:/
".,... ..
/! . I, /' I I f (("7\....0" l-
I- -(..) Y, f" -- v X {{. I '- ~ I J '"1> "L \...J
f :-c/'y. 7',(.;:/ y 16/ \ ,;( r; '> b ( r-lh
{"I ><1 2 . IJ I /p r'J" f t ./( (L~\.--c..~
I )
1.([3" 'J,\ 2" e-/( <-f) ~S- C c." ( I ..j A'r ~ 15- 1. ':,-C i.( g/' 0 ( ,
I .
(/r:; ">: I" ~ /1 :X I' fi r' / I (f)."4: \. His '-~ 1i "?' +~
List tests performed: .....>{.I / (I'" //1 / !)/~f r "',/ F I- cf.J. . 'e... P r { .-~ j
,,:,",J/"G('~./n ( ,011/\ ( ·
...... . {<:.. '\
I '( r \ .... .r' , 0 {. () . (c /'J rL .-.t
...... (, _ r... . _/ ~, "-. I. \"\' ,/ ,"--,- ,"-
/'.- B(I I'J ~.?-1? r.J
f: -r:~:.-, 'f( ,be ( Ff '>
~ (F=t)
/"
1#
"-
,
#>0 V8"
., (
, .()( .
b ,-. ,-n,{"
.
Are there any' discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes. see attached Summary Sheet.
No B
No ,IT'
.
.
To the best of our knowledge. work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted above.
.;-::tj ~ C
. .. <--..J.----.z' f- ~ J'\ _ .:> '.t"
Slgnoo. . ,7'1- . " t,! I >-
Print Full Name: ,~,);. A"'f.C;; Uli"--'
~
Date:
/ '~- ....i-o(.
.L.......~. .
l. D. Number:
/7'::,.'7
(White copy to Braun InteNec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
fml~"insp.4 1n..'i/95
BRAUNOM
INTERTEC
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
Z Periodic
Did the architect or
SpeciallDspedor Daily Report
Page
of
City of
I ,<...~ (
r. ~ (.
{'A
(---'
Date of This Report: I r...~;; .. ,-.f'r -'v. /'"
5.Cy; Project No.: I;r - _,) :.:..~.' 1''-
L-/\'{ ".!- "
\; (',,'V . . (' ( .. /-\ ,/ F
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
~.__.......'
{1'::-::\.::::..... ,.
1/..
\''- .1 ,\. \. ""\... ,(' r'- r'" I' .,;-.r i ,.. ,~
~.. \' ,-' -;-.. . ~
1 r.(,.'~~" '.r- I ((I, . \ '
-'
_ / r' /':- +. . r
.. /' > "
1""',
1..--.- I C-' :, ( L..
.-J
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o Boltin
t-.
,~
"
,.
.p tr,
, ,
\ .., ! (". \'
...-e;r- Rebar Placement 0 Foundations
o Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofmg
o Tendon Placement 0 Other
lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
ineer authorize
n { '"
,,1 r-1 .( (.... ,:',.- //
(,.. \. y. / \ ,.y-,"f'''' (" i: ,(' ./'0.':'
Cr-.........
Description and location of work completed:
, .
--l; (r-, '. h. ; ." -( I L '. \ (~
{ c,. + ..t""
~
I
--+-- \" /'/
. '-f'" .C'~ .,....
r I
"'t'" (\),~( ~
-\.
( .
lr:' (. ( I. \ \ ,(
~ '-v. ( .L. (
'-...~~~i 'v /' \.,')> C, ...
I ('
I l.-( ,r. " ... .~ /-" ~
/',... ~,' '/
r: ,', r( -r I.
it>;;", t (/:.: (,- t:-- )
//
~ (r=1
l \ I
' '-)(n .:......
," /'. ( 1 " .:.'_ {(:-
<'(31' ',(\ 2" I.. /f <'/j
/
, /
, . 1
" P
LA - ,-/
/-,./-. { .. ".
,
,.....", ......
...,.../; '\
List tests performed:
I / -i
:,.,-.! ,? L.,
i
/(. I
./\ .-j l
r
(", ~f
c -- f':
r)( '-. I C::u'
? - '{ ?
Cc-t
(
r. e-J
e I~ ( .s (-;:"
( ~ 1.7' ..
r
" C/'
/1
1'/.
./ ',,1.../ ' y( ::.- 0' '< I {. I. .... _I (7\ -11): t 'v,-,,'
_~, I
"""/ .- t . ~ '''!. /" I ":, . ,<~~' ! y-<
. '-""" . ~ '--"
\,/,/...., -t../"".
fI b k,
,
,
to I"./..
/
-/
. I
\ ! .-
I' ' (\J". -'-'"
.....r 'I '. " ,
+" "7 (f' ','::; f....,.','
j:':;'.-~.
\1 (
')( I>
...
\ ~ I ? ,/A> <;. (,,,_ f
).~. :
t. I
$.(-:-
./
. (
c '- ~"". \
\ /
:.. "
( / q '" , -'" r
'........ "--""
I . / r-( ....t I> J>.
-_:::....
'. .. /'r
'1:- ,'( ~)
~c: \. H: f-::-
. , ..,-
"
I
L.
~~ I
.f:' . ,,/ -f-' ? ~
.,-A
/{/I)
7)
.;.~{(
):,., i
U
.-;.~
i ' r
/' I /' 1,."
1
---", -.(
i
j .,' ,f"} to.-
; .
".-.~/-,. ..-
I- (. .~ (f:;.?-r i'..
[
/ /'
[.11', c. (.
\,=!. ' ~.
'\
.
.
Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes. see attached Summary Sheet.
No ~El
No .h:T
.
To the best of our knowledge. work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable w~rkmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above.
Signed:
.J ./
;/j.. '/'....
Print Full Name:
(
\ . 1<
f ".- i ,j.,._
,<"7 ' /~
\......) J---- I..-j t
Date:
,". ...
'L,-
F' ,~,
; :~. ).~.) ,;L~ /'" / :~-, : "~I ,"'..., -.
I '-7 ..... --7
1.0, Number: I -f ~ .f
(White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to General Contractnr.)
fml\spccinsp.4 112.'i/95
BRAUN'M
INTERTEC
Spedallnspector DaDy Report
Page
of
City of
; ,- t. i-
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Oient:
Weath~:
-~ ,:
:-:t-
Dale of This Report:
Project No.,:
. ... /
_Jo-,
,.- /,/ i
." ~
:../. .
r j .,
f/;':; / :'
"
j' .
f~ '. i -j-,. .-
, ,! /" ....
Ii, .
'- '. /"
Oient Project No.:
Temperature:
Type of Inspection:
0/ Continuous
o Periodic
'I
\
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o Bolli
ineer authorize
o
o
Tendon PI~ 0 Oth~
Yes 0 (Listed Below)
Rebar Placement
Concrete Placement
Foundations
Fireproofing
Did the arcbitect or
No
o
Description and location of wort completed:
l.#~~~: ~?
(...-.\ y/
J..
\ <., I
,
\
,', '.,,,'
,
-4\ t r --t- , .~ ,_.' <:
,(-(~
. .,
I
, ! -' I;
/'. (/:'
I
I
." -:1.
i:' "
.f',. '..,
i:' \ ~/
."
;-
J f
1.-....-.
t" ~
,-
. ...
,..- ,......f
'", ..,-
i __
_~,J'
-.t (~:
,"'- .( .... ~...;.-.
{.
v'
'"
/ {
t~' :....'" L."
._/'
-}
, ; I~
:h- ~~~- 1_,
,) ,I ..j
I
!
I
,.~,
, , -
: ./."'; \.
")
1 ""'-.;'
, ...:....--
J:"" .,
,. '.,
\, ;-
..,
..) _,", .1-..
i':'" i '.
,..-- l. ;......j
.-':/ ()~)~::. ('"
.-1.
\ r~~ ! \
'-
)
f
. '
.- . ."
\.
o (
List tests performed:
, f j
i
d '.
,t
i ~=- .../
. .
-\ ,l.
,.;
.
Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
No 0;
Nu .(SF
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, wort inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted arove. '
Signed:
~ .,.
'; .'. \-~' 't:';/;
Date:
\ '-~>
I .
. "
-> --'-
Print Full Name:
i,.~:f" \-')
,
; .
""\ r (:' " {' i "',_ "
LD. Number:
\
.......-,
- ...)
,---~:::~,
,
(While copy 10 Braun Inrenec file. Blue copy 10 General CnnJral'tnr.)
rrm\sp.:c;imp.4 1/25/95
BRAUN'M
INTERTEC
SpeciallDspedor Daily Report
Page
of
City of
,
',,-_ .. 1
~ r .- C_.
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weatber:
~:_.- ..,f
" .,'
._.-~, (... : ~ ~>
Date of This Report:
- Project No.: ~- ~- /,
.' I
\ \ -
\ \,
!.!I/
.~~
';'
,
-'\ .-
r,i , ~
':..,. :.r \." "-.:,'~'" (' '(~
! . I.
\l"_~-::;
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
;--- C "
i
, \
I .
~
--'
.:lIIJt"',';;"
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
.E:f Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o Boltin
ineer authorize ch
/
Rebar Placement tl Foundations
Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
Tendon Placement 0 Other
Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
f
--~ 1:'-;'- '-\"",r; -1-
:: 'V.~
r
i.: ,.! .,. \ .
- ". ,,-
; ~ ,.~'.
Did the architect or
Description and location of wort completed: -=J~"
J <~,'
'-. ~cc... ,
"r/,-
\~ ''', ."
-,./ (
.('\ _.!..,' -~ +-, '{'-',. '.,
/ . "-'J ' /
"/
'. ..
.j
..#,,-, (
!,. i (=...
~.
\,.
',:'.... '
--i--
. ,
. \ ,
i-
.....".
//p
( /-
: .~,
!
(. -f-
!... ~
,
t ,
,.
(
r-...r
v
/
:. r
(
-~
f , .."~'
\
,-
~";i:-~ (
\.~.( I r:""-
;.
.._ )I'~-~'(-~; t' _~.
r-
J_.
-..)
,
i. . ;'-'
\. l
;::" ,,".
'., t
'~yh< ,
'. r
"-
_.~
\
\. ,': \ .-'"
- -\ t.' (..-
i...... \ ,.
S .f~ ~"'>"."~~L~'\
\.::': t,...:..
-T-, .
I (!~
; r..:':" '~'. t~
,", i
(.
1 ( ,
,\<:\ 't /
\ ,,~.
~ ~ . -..1<
-\~.
.) i',
(
'r.
(''.lA
I
.t-
,': ~''i:-)' I
-. !
I.
:.--~ ""
t .'~
r /,! .,
t
\,_...,)',(;
,.
( /' ,,~.. l I;'
List tests performed:
.
Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
No )[)-
No g..-
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted above.
Signed:
.-;
Date:
... .~."
....
Print Full Name:
.~ rh f
1.0. Number:
(White copy to Braun Imertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
frm\,;p.:cinsp.4 112.'i195
rage _ Of-=-
BRAUN
INTERTEC
DFNTSTEST
.... 3JO.4
Daily Field Notes:
-c-:', _ - \~_ i^"LA 'u !.-- / A
p..... }'=,'--..L L/ _>\~ \ \ ~ 1..--- ..~,
rolect 1'1I0.: .... - "
,,? \ 1-. J ..
location: ,/ { ,.cr;, J ,.
Date: \ 0 -C:}'( -I..,:;~(
Client:
/'
f, .. f! I,
~~, \, ~~
Report No.:
--- )
,. ~
~. (:' ,"
Weather Conditions:
..:;, ~.-.-
I(..~.,
'....... '0, ~
'.
-~
I
L.<"_
.... .... ~ ~".
t f..-,--/."
Arrived On Site At:
Personnel Classification Arrive Depart
,.~.,.:,>." . .' . \:
: /""\, , " ---. f:;._' { ~.. ,-
',. .........'<T,.
Compaction Testing .
No. of T esIs: i
Starting Test No.:
Proctor Information:
Submitted To:
,,,,.,.Ii'
Ending Test No.:
Performed By:
'l"., :.:.~i.
Concrete Testing
Date Cost:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Supplier.
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
Spec. Strength:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Air:
Air.
Air.
Air.
Air.
T emperoture:
Tem~:
Temperature:
T emperoture:
T emperoture:
,
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
\ ~.
I
I'"
Comments:
C/(-l~(( .! !;
T./1e (,J..-". -
, ...;........-
. ~.' ,)-.
,r ...L ..1..
t ." \:-.\
, +\ ~
~ >' i~' ;1'-. l f >-"\.-
....x-."
r ,I
_<"")~#."'-' ilK"".
>-f '._
.1..
....-. .,.sc.' <,.t. [.
'-- ("". +'" / .
.:,! ~"\
);<
{/
_.~:.~~:::.
, ~:..". r
<-(~C /'i
~ < ,'","\ . .
,...t'
t r:. f' i
..,-.-. >" .....
) (..
{ ,,'" f ".- r~!, . f
(
.. ( ~:
\
~ (.~. /',
. if
'1. .""-- '.';..:f'
.""\""
, (
,--:' ('
I '
f -.1
",',r ....a
:Of r'
J '--. c:: (~~. I.
{'+
i. .
,.,
\
--;:,>
;
(
<
,
~ .,
_~ i-
i
{ --
(, '> +
'-. ,.
'"
...
~--.
1.,.1
.-
~ -
.!'.... ~_ t;,
.,'
--
I.
--,.
.~;".
.-
:-.-
.'
L>
/'""
Submitted To:
-::t:? J..
Performed By: 1..-2~\:? :/-~' .. ,_;)
White copy to Broun Intedec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
.
Prot.riding ~ and envirorunental svlHrians since 1957
BRAUN'M
INTERTEC
SpeciallDspedor Daily Report
City of (-:; -- i .r', ,r
Page
of
-.
"'.'....1 "'. \., :- ~'~~, r=.
,t,.
~'.""(:.....
Date of This Report: ;'
Project No.:
....\ ....
"j" ..J
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
~~.(;~
'-._~) .._--'--.
/'
\,,'._-,.. ' .,.,'
.f"""'."-'.
--".,.- !
'.. ("" '\. ~ ~
. ~,'
~, .':
), ~ ,~
4:'
....;:>> ,
) i
'. f'~_
Client Project No.:
Temperature: l ('
~~..,~_.~
~-)
.'-
.,..-}
Did the architect or
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o Bol'
o
o
Tendon Placement 0 Other
Yes 0 (Listed Below)
Rebar Placement
Concrete Placement
Foundations
Fireproofing
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
'{J Periodic
No
o
Description and location of work completed:
{- -.[
\. t f~' .. "
.' -'" ,
\ .... '- [~ --
\ ,'.'
,..~. - ,
'--'
I
-.
"-'I'"';,
.. \,...'.,
-; : ' ,.
" .~-J
-.'/ ,0"
'I (\
.,.
" ; i r\ '> ,:
........-.
\.
.,,/
j
,
-.. .:
,.-"".
L). /
, t/ ,
..-' ./
_ c
,.....
/.;1, .
t\.,
,.
,? .,. (
::-.-' i
...;:-
0.'"
~
_. - ~
o
r.'--'" !
~.-- t
j (~ -t..
J-' .
-..f~
."t-. /.
'.or'
~ .
)
r
.,
",-",,'
N~ ;
t, '
\/ \ I '
. \, '-
"..... i~
...~,"" "'
r'-
~.~;-:~
/'
. !-~
--. \. f / .
, , ') , ! Y --7 ...
_",,:r / -:...- ,..., ._\_) Y
. ....,
, ~:--)
, .
, '
;./ /" t...:; ;
i
-'"- ,..
...... ,~
1.-
I. . \. .
.. .-
'< k(
/'
\
I .". -~ t
;; -'
t_-.._ '
,
~_./
,'-'
..' ~,. .-
.__ l
I'
, I
'. .
~.,,'" ".';!I~-
"..:.) /~ {~".._..
i
"
,
,~ ,.,
~.
( -'-.,..
"F
,",e.)l
liP _""
List tests performed:
I
/f i f..
-J. ----1.' /~
t \".
ii'-
I
~~1
.
Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
No 0
No 0
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable worlanaJ'Wlip provisions of the UBC. except as noted aoove_
Date:
'--.--
Signed:
Print Full Name:
'"
\:::.:.-
LD_ Number:
(White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
fm.\spo:cinsp.4 112..<;/95
BRAUNSM
INTERTEC
SpeciallDspedor Daily Report
Page
of
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
r-; ,
\..:~-'( 'l:;.~ ,/"-
- }
City of t.', c' I
<':/
I I (j ('
\ (' ~ ,I -",_
\ /. "(' (.
. . . ". ).
r-:~-( .n J ,'"
,,- ,-
( r' ,.,.. {' '" t ;
Date of This Report:
,.-~ . /~; Project No.:
('-' '--'f," ", !.: L-- l...-
.~ r;. )\. ~ \}..t ~ r (, ; . ~, /' ';' \w ;~
.f.~..'
"'", ~c
, ,
': ,,'
.,,1;.,
.~.:~~.~/._ .r
'-- -- '~."~ .~'
\_.~,<_/;..: .~- /..... i
<~."; f (~ ". j (~:~h!
....t-.((\ \ ,F. <"::
--;..,,...
Client Project No.:
Temperature:
~_. \..
,r"
r .
_/
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
/!g[ - Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
o Welding
o BoI'
o
o
Tendon Placement 0 Other
lans? Yes 0 (Listed Below)
Rebar Placement
Concrete Placement
Foundations
FireproofIng
Did the architect or e
No
o
Description and location of work completed:
f-. t i~' -,
\
,
"t"r ::, \.( \<:;... 4:~
i
,
,"...;2 ..~t ..
.
,
" -.'-
!,;;..
'"~ , 1": - t.~,::
\
, .
'..
"
,
/,
\
{.
..... \
,
\ ,(.....: ,', -
J , 1 r.
. --:""..r
./ "
:' I.....-..i
)t.,^ t'. ,---.....J
'",.-- '....
I I .'
.I I (; .
;.' \. ; ,,/
""'"" ,r.
...., b
\/A.-. -t<:
, , -~
/
r~ ~~; -r:
,'.
- ....,:,'
") '. .-...-
\.:: (./ .-
;
,(" ::'~, i
-k-
;:.~ \ :
~--
L-
1.:;. _
>J
__ i -(
\'.._::,-... (~,:... ("_ I. j!
Lj r,. l-"
;:
/'j \ J, ..
./ I, -' ""
}-.
(>c
. /."
....il -
List tests performed:
.
Are there any-discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
/
No . ,0
No EJ
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted above.
Signed:
;
I
,'.- "'_ .-...._j _'~""""'~'A.""_._-
- /.
Date: :,-//-.' .. "~') (,
Print Full Name:
~-, -. \
, _,"'~"~"'i
"-, .oK','
L~ ,""'." '~;"" f _~" J .~....
I. D, Number:
(While copy 10 Braun Intenec file. Blue copy to General ContrQc.1nr.)
"rm'spccinsp.4 1/2.~195
BRAUN
INTERTEC
rage _ at-.J
DFNTSTESJi
I
.... 3J04
Proiect No.:
l
r~L
''''-'/ I, f L /
, C,,/" }!, -~J( .-\
Client:
( '-1' (,I ,. ! ) ":0:
" .' ll", ~ ./ _" __
eC..c
Daily Field Note~
I
r
Report No.:
...J'
Lomtion: >t' .1
Date: / ~ );/ !.~
h .-., f i I ("
.jl
. -"
:..---.r'tor..
Weather Conditions:
..\. r:J
/'
,.
( (..,.".- -,
~r.On Site At:
.'
l
J:
Personnel Classification Arrive Depart
...-....' /"" r::,. t -' .-.,.~
. ,,;;: /..., e t - ,
.>...> ,
-/ 7
Compaction Testing
No. of T es1s:
Starting Test No.:
Proctor Information:
Submitted To:
/;
Ending Test No.:
Performed By:
i "" -
~-
Concrete Testing
Dote Cast:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Supplier:
Spec. Strength:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Air: Slump: T ernperature:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Air: Slump: Temperature:
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
Mix:
r ,
;?-s..,. S
r:.- .-.
,,..L
J i,.,,; {
r-
,-
....../'
I
L-",,_~;. r /"
--..::. ,-'''--
"
'-.<~." .-
(
.(
r,~'
r>...
'-"--' -~
./ -"-
'i
f
-" .
1""."-
;../
1 ('?'
1"< .'
{;
('-;--:"....,-.]
<< ")
f../- L.--
:; <.~l
../' //
~.
-.I
!
"'
/.
/
,-
/..- .
('7t-,...j ,.
"
; ".
tOt
A'
.'
r", ..-,0.
r
;/,.ll
;"
,.....-
/ ;
-" / " /~~~
r-,'-'
-'
i ~ .'
l:;..
/.
f r;
~~....
,. .-"
,
..... :"'1"'.
'7f( /'.,
~-;J-;;'i.'" ,pl
~"i;""-""......,ti
.-j--
.,JI' / ,;.
_~J,<,;;
! ."
,/ j.) :':..f'~ / -'-
Submitted To:
Performed By:
,.or
~. <~~~,~ I--.'~
/
'?-7"~ ~:_;...;:._/ ~'
_______,v.
White copy to Broun Intertec file. Blue copy to Pro;ect Site Representative.
.
Prooiding ~ and ertfIirrJmnmlal soladians since 1957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Page_ ot_
DfNTSTEST;
.... 31041
,
V f -- ,-.. 1("'" .._ _ :f _.~ l._~\
Proiect No.: ~, '--"" ~ ,.--/" '_.
'-', ./
f ~
I"
/
Daily Field Notesi
,
i
j
_:,';'.-..r-.
Client:
Report No.: (
\ /;
'.f- ",.
r'
,"r',' "i' :...~t
J-.t_
'. , "
I ..........j
\ i
, ; ,,-', ;-~.
Location:
Date: I ~ - G( .-::
...-
C::>k?
Arrived On Site At:
Weather Conditions:
Personnel Classification Arrive Depart
,- -./', /- c,'" ,f"_' .-'
\ " .-r' - ,'-
--,
..
Compaction Testing
No. of T es1s:
Starting Test No.:
Proctor Information:
Submitted To:
Ending Test No.:
Performed By:
<i
Concrete Testing
Dale Cost:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Set:
Supplier: Spec. Strength:
Mix: Air: Slump:
Mix: Air: Slump:
Mix: Air: Slump:
Mix: Air: Slump:
Mix: Air: Slump:
Temperature:
Temperature:
T emperuture:
Temperature:
Temperature:
Comments:
..~-- /" , r'1 : p j~."-F-
1',-/
',." \( ',-,
---t
/" {\
\. C.
./ -
--'c,'._
f,.r.>
:<
\
..:. i . ....'
_.. 1 {~_"(
~,.+ ,''''
To':"
- . /
".-/' '.
,.' -;) "--,
y .,.;;;,/-
;
~-.: - --.::.>~{ .~",- ---,~
Ll I . (,' I-I i
! -,---"" .' ( -....-/
.
'/' >'.,
)( JC
, !
.\'17
/
't'.~
"'r (
, '
-.--'
\- -j )
I, ,(
':_-> \.'
. I
{ ,
.;.. ,-~_.. .~.{~: \
.'}
,
-.....'
y 'c...-'"
\. "
,
.'
.j
\
I.'
("
-
-','
/ ; I
.J (~ /'l'-:'
t
-f ."
C
,..' .
."-. ;.-"
l ( .
./ ,-'
..-,
'i
I' -
-.
. .--.."
Submitted To:
Performed By:
:;.;
, ,-
/ \.-
----
White copy to Broun Interlec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative.
.
ProWling engineering and envimmnmurl sdwtions since 1957
r "
BRAUNSM
INTERTEC
Special Inspector Daily Report
"'-'7 / /I 1/_
Cityof ?--;::'/of!- ~
Page
/ of J
Report Number:
Project N3I1;le:
Project Address:
Client
Weather:
(::J I
(~/71/?lC:=-f.-C 4''=;:; ;3IJ:>6
Date of This Report: /0 / L... /(.,-/"{Ci
. /;:>~ L., !
Project No.: C' -C?b -
~~-O~
I ;/~
"-"
Client Project No.:
Temperature: ~0
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry / ~bar Placement 4L----F'oundations., S:..) I L- s;.
o Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
o Boltine: 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0
Description and location of work completed:r::~/.vd C5e;"/"'5: ~~) ~ J (?I-{)
fA.- '--/-'1 (/r -V J _ -T- e J t::f~~
J
~f!};r
ObgrJ/-c:JJ
,
/ /IU f#~ ;e in r ~ C--L~:
~/~ hV-6 4):
1YPe of Inspection:
o Continuous
.....
[SJ-/' Periodic
lJ. I! /JC5
~ IAlOII
y- ~~ ;-^--~ t
-tI:::.s: ka y "S !"
hC-f: 0-1)
List tests performed: -4/7 j/i-::.1 U <\'\ e...-v-
L 0;"/ S/sl-e-r.. + t<.j I};OS6
I
-/esl LJ/ /-S-
I
/YZJ~3 ~/5, ,5'/<;
hhse--11/ ~ f) /e v,,'o V1 S
I
.
Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet
No [I]...-/
No m---
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work. inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable w~hip pro. visions of the ffiC/UB. C. except as noted above. I I
/ '~'J# --1 /:;? j(,6.i~LJ~ /0 -; loC
SignedL ..;.p ..//,tV---E7 --0 _AJlL-rr v---.-/ Date: / ( ( v-: I J
Print Full Name: ,R _51)?? fH- .-- J.D. Number: / G-- / I ;;:
. /l/;J Pdor ZnJ/IV1~l"'----
(White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.J " ' -' I
frm\specinsp.4 112SJ95
~"'~"'~""'-'-'"'~.~""-'''-''''"''''''''-';''';"''"'''~",~"",~",-",,,,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,---,-,,--~,-.",--,,>,,.",,"~.---~_.....,<_...~--
., 1If
BRAUN
!NTERTEC
.,....-...1 ~_1......~
/,
\~
i
{ -1} It'l [or,J (? -'L-
October 20,2005
,
(~,"1" l... c~t.. i,,,-'" {..t-l....C....
... "-/- . . .::~ ;- '-
{A...'-<" 0: v <:
t-v -<- C-t'"YY'- ~...f C<: cd
I' /
Mr. Gordie Schmitz
500 Sooth Marschall Road, Suite 300
Sbakopee, MN 55379
J .
'U;;:t... elt..
r
.\~j
Re: Village Commerce Building
Park Nicollet Road & County Road 39
Prior Lake, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Schmitz:
This letter summari.ze& compaction testing completed thus far on the Village Commerce Building
in Prior Lake; Minnesota.
The purpose of the compaction testing was to evaluate the effectiveness of the compaction
procedures being used by the excavating contractor and to determine if the densities obtained in
the field met the minimum project specifications. To date, we perfonned a total of six compaction
tests on the site for utility trench and foundation wall backfill. The locations on the compaction
reports represent the specific area and elevations noted. The minimum density requirement of the
engineered fill placed in building pads was 95 percent of standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698).
Some of backfill for the utility trenches intersected with the planned footing layout. The compaction
requirement in these areas was raised to 98 percent.
As you review the compactioo test results, you win notice test numbers, I, 2, and 6 initially failed to
meet: the minimum density requirements.. Test nmnbers I and 2 were retested. Test number 2 was
retested using the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), since reinforcing steel for the footings was
already placed and a nuclear density gage could not be used. Upon retest, test numbers 1 and 2 met
minimum density requirements. Test number 6 is a failing tests that has not been retested. Test
number 6 should be retested prior to concrete slab placement.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please can Joe Nietfeld at 952.469.3644
or Ron Shaffer at 952.995.2234.
Sincerely,
~UN~RPORA11ON
~-
Engineer-In-Training
,./-) './ /
6/t;-n~e<.Y?c-:~ ~f...~
Ronald A. Shaffer, PE
Senior Engineer- Associate
Ltr- vmaseCommen:e Bldg
. -4 Pnwidin.,! enginee1'ing and eTwiT(l1imenral solutions since /957
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Page 1- of_~
DFNTSTEST
..... 3I'lM
............, ~-&5-~A- CIonI,
lAxuIion: V'('~ C~~ .A B:.,~~
Dale: \ 0 -6 -Oc...
WealherCondilions: e~J. u_ {.Dj
{...~~~
*/~ lA~
AnW&d On Site At:
Daily Field Notes
It.eport No.: Z,
PenoI.....d
d. ..c:......
Arrive
Depart
&:
CompaClion Testing
No. of Tests: I
Starting Test No.: . "3 L(?~ J
Proctor Information: --.:f2 '-
Submitted To:
Ending Test No.:
rformed ~ ~A
Pe By:__
ConawJtr Testing
Date Cost: Supplier:
Set: Mix:
Set: Mix:
Set: Mix:
Set: Mix:
Set: Mix:
Air:
Spec. StJength:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Slump:
Temperature:
TempenJture:
TempenJture:
Temperature:
Temperature:
Air:
Air:
JVr:
Air:
<:"'kct> - .b. . -
.A t~ .(j. -r + .. ,t\(~ e:,fs.
Submitted To:
Performed By: ~~te.
While r;opy to Bnrun InIerlec file. Blue mpy to Pm;ed Site 1lepI......~.
· ~~_D&W.oo,.CRtdlJObdims sina: 1957
FIELD OBSERVATION FORM
Project #:
Pad Dimensions:
Excavation Length:
Excavation Width:
Excavation Oversizing:
Hold Down:
Groundwater Elevation:
Excavation Sidewall Soils:
BL-05-04456A
Village Commerce
Lot:
Date:
Site Plan Information:
Block:
Addition:
October 19, 2006
(Fr) (Rr) (Lt) (Rt)
(front) (rear)
Soil Boring Information:
Weather/Site Conditions:
Excavating Equipment:
Excavating Contractor:
Observations Requested by:
Y() N() #
600. Partly Swmy
Contractor
N
HAPIDCP Results
Test Number 2A Description of Soils Description of Soils
sorr.:e Elevation 96 (BoUom of
footiug Subgrade)
B~ 0-6" 44-
Blows, 6-12" 41
~12-18" 32
B~11-2~ 21
~ 24-30" rr
Blows, 30-36"
Blows, 36-42"
Blows. 42-48""
Key: x
x
S
HAP =
DCP =
:~~~
~
~ limits
Hand Auger Probe
Dynamic Cone Penettometer
OSOl967affidd ob form-l
00
o
r:::
~
j
.
Q
1:
o
a.
.;
R
CI\
-"
i~
foo:;!
CEo<
i~
!.-u
s,g
0-
U.
~
:s.
-..
Efoo
Z
:t
C
Ie
.
u
u.J
I-
Q:::
u.J
t-
Z
11$
!i '8 ...
m'l
]1:':::
..........
~ ~ ri
...
)9 i
g
i
..
...0
0'"
~~
:a
"1
~~
0-
CO)
11
o
tY:
..~
.5g
;gu
~~
8"3
<b~;Z;
\Oa~;::E
~9==..
--10 u 8 ~
~.Jl :.Z ~
~o. J..
f~=i!.2
A.123>~lt
o
.5
,:;
II
~
a
o
u
s::
.g1i CI\
uo :::;
~~ ~
13~ ~
u u ~
~Sou
6:g:?!~8.
i ~rn .. g
_ f!C)..~-a
uo:ii,j;ri:i
li
e'"'
J! :di
-ulit;
i~.
0::
..-2
~tl.........Pl
~. #""
_ 0._
:!g
o
u '"
;1.3
ii: ,!! $.
.s~
tZ:p!:oaa
iE~'51i1i
_D6.o..D..D
-2~~~~~
~ifif.;d'~
_00500
....bJie::e
"'d---.-
-oo1!""'"
~~j<~~
9
-i
!!
J
...........v~
III') va tn '" ~
0<;>0<;>0
iPl .... ~ ilWJ: ...,
NNNrlrI
B
~:lDlD<<<
O.
o~
...... OD lft Vl W'\
Q\ CJ\ eft CI\ Q'\.
o
eo.." l'
~ C\ 0.. 0.
i:"u
C
8
~S
NNO\V~
-----
-----
~Q=~~
a5cc;OOOO
Cia~~ci~~~
~8=
Ec~~~_~~
a _ u G ("II..... -
3:8 ~~"'N'"
..
c
.. l>
51i
is
g S 8.
li I:
.. -....
""'-5-
l"ij
-b"
~ ~:2
.... 0 ~
>-.. >-
15.~t
fi;g
u...
lI:t:'l
:;~;;
e~!
- --
.. .. ..
.U.. .
.. .... I- t--
~'"~~~~
9-.....---
ooa-oo
00 p. el. rL J. d.
lit
C~'DOC)V
!e!?~~~
o~~~~~
;~
!J.
..
~-"""M
<=
o
'j
!Ii
- .
1--..
~...
i!ii
- ..
Q~
. .
......
O!:l
BQ-
s>u
.1
)1
~a
;:?;
G~
J2
8'j
.J
u
!3
i
o
9 -g
:g:l~
l7.I
0. .....
~~
--
<"4 '0
~~
u~
1lDJ.
D'l
d
~::o~::
~Do.~a-.
i3
..
u
<=
e
cB
~
~
~
~
a
I
..
~
...
D
of;
....
o
..
On
s:
-2
ti.
"I:
~..c <,;:
-,J. 'e -a
C=_::!fl- {::.
a=~.;!;c:u_u
.0 ~ .I( t:g = '0 ::: c
~ _c:g_<:~i"55
.s~o::f:.~&::::E
~
~
~
.
~
0\
on
0\
i'
Ox
a
-
of;
....
a
..
o
"'"
to
'"
E
:::J
U
.s:::o
D. '0
:-CD -0
050 ~
: ~~ ii
:5!!~,... Z
~ a.~ .c::
.!! D.1j eo
z~O ..
~
....
o
if
a.
~
li
1i
o
.t
...
Iii
~
1::
U
-a
-=
6
o
J~J! ..
~
..
ibB~ <n
G
i~i~ e
GO> CiI'.) a) ...
3?-3~ ;:;
b.ob.ob.ob.o b.o
g -5 -5 iHi .d
...
~ d s:: 8 s:: I!
- t:.~f-<IJ
0 f-
0
..J ~a-ca- i:'
5 s;::;ga a
... :>55:5 5
e
... -Nf'll'). "" .,..
.. ....
....
..
..
>
]l'i0\
l~~
m::e
l~~
_ c: ~
!~
5
E
~"'~
.!:~~
....
r::
::I
e
m
;0
0
a- io
2; OM
:::!::;
j
. a;
Q ~ K
1: ... D
Cl ::i! ~
A-
t>
~
f'o1I
~
.!!f'o1I
:C
f-:!!:
S::f-
Ofl}
li~
Z:g
E.a
0-
yi
:9-
.!!!
fl4f""
z
:a
c
.-
.
v
w
t-
fX
W
I-
Z
'"
C")
"D
..
C
p:
...a
e!:
:So
=u
~~
u~
e c=
<-:l;z.
\()E_~
VlEU"""
..,. c= V
..~u g-=
io:. :'Z...J
o<i' ~ 1': i:)
.. ..J._ ...;::
AoCO>n.n.
..
..E
~
III
C.
E
o
U
c
~~
ao
C~
-=
a~ ~
u ~ :::!:
~a ci
..o~gx.
eiiaJP'; 0
~~o~'><:
_s-oa::~
UO.....;;rn
.. ~
a;
"j,g
g~l
apt :;;:B-
C) _0._
;gtL ~.;~
i-j~
.. "" III
-5 'ii..c::
~ ~'~
~~~
fi ~ ~
a '"V ::I-
~l!~
.. :I :I
e E ~
=-~
;; ~ ~ {!. {!!
~"'~~~~
E
c i: "'It
=I~
di5~
..
..5
s:
.x~...
eQ,-
Co ..
o
:.l~
~JI
E u CD
E It
8-
-0 E ~
r::
U ::I 0
5e on
D- 00.
&=
cn:::!:e
0
u
-
~-g ~
- ..-
l;1II;)t
G E"~
a:C
o
i:;>'fi"
0.......
!E~
- -
A. s::
.5~
:: ~
;i; .!! ~ ..
.5~
~gc
;;'CCJ
~8~
0-
r--
M
....
....
\()
!~
0-
2s
-
;;
.. ....
~O
o
i 1i
-UA
'j; ii
{i c
r. ~
..,~
:i c
c.-<
I
~
QC
~.K......
...J"'::".
e~
::I ..
E C
.~O
:::E
e#
::I e
Eii!~
a-S
O;:i!
i-
i
~ .c:1
~ Q.'U
.
SZ!2
~t~
-Em
! D.....
· Q.8
-81
z_
r::
.g
..;:!!
~m
."
:I rn
U
9...
...
art.
cn
r 61
1i1~
> 0-
U
iii
.l
DC
c ...
E
.e I
..
a: 0
~.g
~:!
i:..!!
iil~
-2
.;
E
i!! ~
illS:
t: :I
_ en
Ox
e ..
- ..
Q~
II .
E~
c
"g
a
-.:
~oo
. .
0<
:; ..
_ c
]~
...
o
..
..
...
...
-a
a
i
;z
..<::
Co
=
~
i:;>
:!
.!!
~
I:
"'-
<0
1ii
~
r::
u
-0
0;::
<=
<>
o
G
~
..
0
;::
B
.s
c
0 &:
'i e
'"
0 ::I
...J 0
1;; b
.-
.... {of)
9
;; \()
.:: ....
ri
.;
Sf
;>
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Letter of Transmittal
Client: Greystone Construction Company, IDe
Date: Odeber 20. 2806
Braun IDtertec Project No: BL-Q5-04456A Transmittal No: 2
8mUll Intertec Corporation
21021 Heron Wtq
Suite 101
Lakeville, MN 55044
To:
Gordie Sdtmi12
Greystoae Coostruc:tiOJl COIDpany. lac
500 S Marsdlan Road
Suik 300
Sbalwpee. MN 55379
PIIeoe: 952-496-2227
Fax: 952 44S 4191
Re: Village Commerce Building, Park Nic:oUd Road & County Road 39, Prior Lake, MN
TIIis Traesmittal is beiq Seat:
_ For your approval
_ As requested
--X....- for your records
For review
I Information Sent I Cepies I Refereoce NumMI'S
Street Utilities - Densities Test 6
I ConuucIatslCJarific:ation
Test Taken 10/16106
I Tra_itfaI List
Robert Dana Hutchios, City of Prior Lake
Gordie Schmitz, Greystooe Constructioa Compaoy,Inc
Brian Saffer, LS Engineers
Andy Krenik, Tushie Montgomery &. Associates)nc.
Ildmutioll Seut
S1Jl:d Utilities - Densities (l)
S~ Utilities - Densities (J )
Street Utilities. Densities (J)
Street Utilities. Densities (I)
Sent By:
Phone:
Susan P. Kolle
952-469-3644
~,lJ;MII
. Providing elfgineering ond enWonmenIDI soll/tions since J 957
-of! ~I t:l
:aa a t:
u
"U .. .r:>
j'o 'C:; ;J.
on~ -;:;
.r:: a:-
u
f!! C>
1i.~ .... Ii
.... ...
'0'" ... 0 ...
5 :; N '"
;no Ii: oe(
C a
.. c C ....
E & u ....
'" .. CI
uo .... Di! ...
CI oN
.=- ...
~ -
<: .=
::J
e
III
.s
0-
PI
~
~
...
.,.-
cS:: c
_ ::s u.g
'130
N =u ~~~x
.... ~ollS ..!! ... e
0\ u E:
:IN 011 '=:0
;g eo u
<~II!;Z
F-o~ ~eo~ gft
=... ~ 0='- ... ""
.2rn _ U 8~ .. CJ -i
li~ ..
'ti,..- a-
- -
.'U ..... :t;Z p..c E
c.o tiC? _ ~ ~ .sc! ii
s; ......J- ...:
Ou a.j:Q:>p..~ i=:!
(J~ jl~ - ...
'0_ - ~1
:sa 0. - a.
.s~ . .
I&tF-o t-_
om
..1:
liB
~8
-
""
asO
0 .21
.s _i~
:>;: e :;~ I-
! ...
CJ liB..
0 d- u _"U
E 5-5-
rn l~j
Z U 0
U
'lG ... ;>"..
s:: CI 5Q..6:
W .g-S 0. ; ;(5 ~Ii'j
:I 00 I"- 0 c; bib
I- "',x: ...
-;;= on ree
O! on
C c:. ~ g.g g
o.a::: j...
W U" 8:1=
GO ~2;!
2:'oD .0
III l- II! .....
.;.2)!~ 8- -....
- --
. Z i ~~ B~ ! -~~~
Boo"3~ 'lG ".. . .
on (D U!I X<mu
'"
S2
0- 0
"'8 CJ
Co ...
::i! .....
...
! -
. ..
c -i ~
1:
0 ~
~
a
tIC
?>
tic
-li Jt ....
....I~ ..,:
~€
_ co
-Sa .....
~ 0
::E t ..
~~ ='
p..
S3 ~
- -
D.o
o~ i
<: di E
.2 a
G ~ .0
0."0
u II> :.g
!: . "0
5 II. 0:5 ;e
en :~N
u u
:2001 Z
9 ~ 0.- --=
... .0.- ...
~ 2~O ..
0 p.. l5
ll) .."
::::
.2 ...
.
> 0\
..
Pi
..
tl!
~8
.. - !
.2 .
.. ~
a: 0 -!:!
- c g-
o
'i ! rt
> .."
U c 5
Pi
l;:: ~
5
...
0;::
'"
8
<:
..
~
-c
~CIO
.. ,
Coe(
<: ..
0.5
~:!!
.30
'iii
~
~
51
.5
0::-
.gii:
....
.. a
~g
(-om
e
- OD
~
V\
N
..:
..
>
..., e Il!~CClQ
~~ "" ;a _ _ t: t:: t::
'C cC-XB-X
c- oo U (!.{!.ooo
.I! 0 "$ .oL - P! P! ot.
<I>~ -a Q~ c::cc
.. o 0' gOO
11: ... ~ - - e r: r:
... -u -e~..uv
.".- - Ot oO"'8~~
c c ... Ii: .3.3~ -<
. ..
;nO
.... e
c: B5
.. ... ... ... ... ...
E .... .... .... '" or)
i: ... _ E C> C> C> C> C>
~ ... ... ... ... ...
-0 I!tj; ... ... N.... ....
c- OOl
- .... !
!i
..
..
ell
..... ~ ... ...
;0
~
t- Ot
..., co
0 .. ...
~ .....
...
! ;!.
..
. u -
Q -i .. c ..
1: e e-: eIIm<(<(<
0 :::E f-- E ..
e- 0-
" u
:i'
"De::"
~~~ "" - "" ... ""
Q\. u_O 0. 0. 0. 0. ...
.... .. c: -
11 12.-
UJ~ ~
0
~ u
..~ c
cO::
._ ::J .. ..
-00 >I~'" oo 0. .... ....
.... =u ~ Aoe 0- 0- 0- '"' 0-
.... ~clIS ;.e
0\ .. "0
.:t" eg 8
Ie <~P!:~
fo-;:E ..act) ~o
CEo- ~f5=. 0 .... N 0- ... .... c
-i~ ..gu]it !- :: - i
-
i..; ~;z ..J - ..
-'1::1 ,.. c ~-
C.o _0 ..!! i!! l5 .Eli
B.c: f~= ..-.: ell
0- Porn;>,..,.. 1-...
UU !fa _ rn
..
,,~ .... ... ~ ... e~
-- ~--~ aG;
.- .E~
_ lD . .
kof'oo 1-..,
011I
.j C> ~ co C>
lie ci ... .q ""
~~
b- e> e> C> :!
~lo N aD 0
::: ... ... _ 0
U 0..... ~i
oS ;II;:;
~.!:!B
~ e - ....--- ~l~
8- (; <i''Taoc> 3.-l!I
E co eJ..P.A..a.';" !Ese;
Z U 0 !~l;
u - ""..
C '0 'D \0 '10 10 ~~3
W ,g1l Q\. B~~~~~
.....-t...V).1f') ;\:0;1:
:t UD ..... o~~~~~ ~~b
I- 5~ ...
..,. 0'"
-- V> E c; ;:
C 0::: ciil 3.sS
o..r: ~ 1:.... .=a.s
W Uu 10 1:'51
..31 -
. l- e 8 u ot. 2~~
.;: .B ::E r"l !. iii
Z Ji-rn 0
. ~8~~ ... _I-....t--
- ...t'..
=... ::I..s:: f'! -co-.~ ..,..
tJO....l7.Ifn <a:ao
:>.
o~
.DB
:I>.
E-=:
E ~
jO
:::E
... ....
~~
"$.
ii u
Sa
';::.l!I
8"~
N ..,
ri...i
c
o
ii ~
~ u.....
:u;:;
CI
u
a oa
otLri.
"-'
c
~~~~::
>000.0.0-
u
iii
..
u
c:
..
,~
..
a:;
c:
.2
~
>
..
iii
lID
r::
1ii
x
u
..
-=
r:: '0
i ~
.: ::
~~ ~~ ~
c::::E.~c:~c.!!
0...<....:0-0
!~:o ~~..::3ii:!..d
o....cwd!~!
.......0...11-"""11-
f
&.
0-
W>
0\
..
r::
ii
1<
u
u
:
....
o
.P
C>
...
c
~
il
.c:.O
a."U
:-411
o'!;o
:.~~
:3le.....
t 8:"-
_.1>
z_o
....
o
u
llP
Q.,
..,
~
2
~
Co
u
...
.!;
i
..
-J::
go
A:
"CI
5
a
';>
r::
~
I::
c
o
U
~ :a
l-5l~ ..
cn Gill a !
,,)! "<I) .....
-= i-= ~ I
~i:t;5B
U'J U'J en U'J
.. ... .. ..
----
----
ii:ii:ii:ii: ii:
r:: .IC .-c: .JC ...c: .s:
a !u..o u
I c c c c
eeee e
0 f-t--t--t-- !-
...J ~~~~ ~
~ 55:5:5 :5
e
.... -......... ... ...
...
f'! N
..;
..
>
"ll
till
..
~
:-0
~
U.
o
o
III
tII
i-
a.
e.
g
Do
'I
'2
!
...
:; o-z
'go ~~ ii'
...,-0 ~
~ ~~~
- c-c..
~ li:fS
ii~
it
o
....
';}
;:;=C;~OD.....:i::'
e
enenUJUJ00~
[al'f[aa!l
Illlllb
........................ I.
-._._._._.._.. 0
~:::::;:;;:;::::s
5'5'5'5'5'5'
~i.[g.g.[g.
o 0 0 000
.. .. .. .... .... ...
:E:E:E~:E:E
~ !~d'!:!~d; J;
QQQQQOb
~~~~~~o
inr e" e. f Ir !.
::I
~g:~??~~
GO ~ t: N 0\ ~ B.
:,.. u. '3.
o
::I
Ol....................
~. e: e: e: e: e: ~
frttiii~.
DoDo DoQ.Cl.Do 0
5'~~~~~::I
~g8888~
. .., .., .... ... ... ~
....e!!!e!!!e!o
g~~~~~g
~ &. !. !-. 3. !: ..
ft 0 000 0
... ::s ::s ::s ::I ::I
e!
o
~~:g:g=~i
cr
::I
en
"llg,
s6
o
0i"
"<Ie.
o tII
~ i
g
~o
-,1
~ ! e"
~~
;c
So'i
.... !. ~
.~t"4
:"''[I!;-
.ot:l
..:<!
OIll>l!Il....__ >-I
1.101 N _0'000"1..
--I...;''''''f.... ~
!Ul !!
a i ii
~~~ 0-
S go 8
-€lK-9
-<n-<
~. Ii ~
~"a g.
~' -< 1
Ci ~ _.
!i[
! ~~
~J
1:1',"
0"
ia
000000
t;)-.........-..-..-..O
~~~~~~ri
'tl'tl"'''''''....g>
bbbbbb=
wwwwwwe
----...........
--N-....N
\OOO-OO......,J:O
0000.00
o~
......
l!l
t:I
E ~
~-
o~
!",!",~;-I;-I~~il
OOOOOO-Oa'"
lilt='
""-of
. 1
alt='
g -
...iE
""-
I: -of
lfi
B
=-
0-
"
~~ooO\~oo
~5'
...&0....
a,,![
n
o ~
a ..
-...., -
'D...,'O'O\O...,;l:::~&.
"I 0\ 00 "I '" "I I:>' <.
o. ..
::s
n
i if
\O\O'O\O\O~!. .2:
tAtht.AltAththOI;;).....
III B a.
~
.. Q
>>>>>>';'1
'-'lit
,....';}
t:lt:It:It:It:It:I!;.
~~>-I>-I~~ ;;0.
o
R'
;:;;:;
t:I
.:; '"
----~a
"'~~"'~g-
g
~~~~~~
00000,0
VIi \h \.II; VI! Ut UI
.... .... .... .... .... ....
~~~~~~~
fifsifii:
oooooo';}
pp,p,pppn
g'~g'g'g'~f.
ll' g" g" g- g- lr ff
:i::l::l::l-::l::l
t:It:It:It:It:It:I
Sg,
Ii
6
tfJrnVOl~n .
::reo _ Z
6"::;'0 ;;-
.. 00'< D ;II
-gt.> ~_ -I
83::0"
p 5 g m JIll
2 nO
::ro ^'
I!.='
.... -~ -I C
VOl ~2
t.>
"I on m
-0 G,g- Z
::s ()
n
0
3
-a
~
S-
o
~:3!
I ~
iE
~n
"l:I"l:I<IJ:J"lf _0
:!.e: ::::t""Cl tl"S
~ ~.i b~ O'a
t"" Z VOl $!: ca...
~n'~6:1- >a
ens-
..2.0:t ~I:l
~GSv. i:i:~
-SO\
20..> 01
o a wE:
~..
flplJ:J \C
W
s::: W
n=:
aP-
s::-
~~
~
~
....
\0
i:'
"CS
~ f 0
::l
~ 0
!l ..
i
... ~ -
.... S
...
<:> It
""-I
C>
0\
IJ:J
m
~ 0 If
~ I
b i. i
~~ [
;c~
8: ~. g
'D![
BRAUN"M
INTERTEC
SpeciallDspedor DaDy Report
'I /
City of /~- ( . jV' l /./ ..:'
Page
of
i./ ',j.4', ...
.-" .-
;:/r .J . 'Ut
Date of This Report:
Project No.:
/ II ~l.',.r
Report Number:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
..,1;
.,/ i ',~ }v.~ 1i..,
Oient Project No.:
Temperature:
Did the architect or
Inspection Coverage:
"' Masonry
o Welding
o Bol'
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
1:.1 Periodic
\
. \
t.-; I.) ~ ...~.
c' f
,>""
~
I !
)'{
o
o
Tendon Placement 0 Other
laos? Yes 0 (Listed Below)
/
dA
I ·
-I"" t:
.....1 '...J
Rebar Placement
Concrete Placement
Foundations
Fireproofing
No
Description and location of work completed:
/ );'
I' ,
/ / },:;",,.,,,,I ; ll!.-.
)'
. /,~,
/
/
,
":.
,
"
i/ ",,~
.-
'-
_of' ,':- ,,':0,
~." .........-
I ',.!
i,
:..:. - ~ ,-/ /
!r
L/
7
,
1/. ,
f' (If I,.
"/ '
"
I
II
f ; ~...
.
List tests performed:
,.r...."
';,'\,.,1 .)
'-
..~') . \..-- ...1, ' ...,,~
/ot }~
.
Are there any'discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Nn fa'
No ~
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans. specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted above.
." I
---.." (
Signed:
,
~-,.,.: .~
I ':
Date:
I'i .' ' ,,-
Print Full Name: '-.), >~
i
./
....i. (
J.D. Number:
(While copy 10 Braun Imenecfile. Blue copy to General Contractor.)
fnn~insp,4 1/2.'i195
'~,;~BRAUNSM
Special Inspector Dally Report Page of
INTERTEC City of I/2To ,e t/h~E
Report Number: Date of This Report: //- "3-~~
Project Name: l&--t--t JJh F L U ,y? ,pi 67'U,t< f~l.Project No.: IV-. c5 - 4 ~./6 j.,..y
Project Address:
Client: Client Project No.:
Weather: LLE)?-fe Temperature: yo.s
'JYpe of Inspection: Inspection Coverage:
0 Continuous ~ Masonry 0 Rebar Placement 0 Foundations
~. Periodic 0 Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing
0 Boltin~ 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes o (Listed Below) No Lk
Description and location of work completed: b ~s.t,i)!.u~ A1.-i~j!y 1'/4& I-V ..:j" ...v"
7tJv!7-1
L-2 ~y~~
/
70 l.A.J &n- ;::;,u~ 4-n- ~ Tb
".
,/l/DTa--Y)... P~?;t: CVItJ 77f 4f T7JL v'!->-r,v~
Lt.Jl.....J L J F I
/ / :;J t1 ?I:/ I
/iT<:: ,.,~i?.... ;-'1"," .. ../ f' .~ I
C2;"~~" TT-vh . 'j
I
I
r .1J S lJu TJi ~~."1,. 7
r 0-""-/ ~ 't(
/00.l\J /4>7' , ,Nt,)
H/fl
19 Lt, /2 tr::rN R t! I ti-'y~
{O/!jl.L,.
ll.-' f~ me "
List tests performed:
.
Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0
Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0
If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
No G!t'
No~
.
.
To the best of our knowledge, work. inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the mC/UBC, except as noted above.
SignOO: 4 /l ~ Date:
h l/ r./ /. I(;;v/~ 6'"
Print Full Name: / ,. / .;,;.' (
/
I.D. Number:
II - 3 - 0 6
<l f )) /71
(White copy to Braun Interlec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.J
fnn\specinsp.4 1f25J95
6'}~~~, ~
r; H !~
~J~
Call Gopher State One Call
before excavation
454-0002
&J
If
7'-0" I" 1'-3 t
),
1'-5" 4" 3'-9"
~I"r
I -,
b.
OJ ----1 ----1 <
10 ----1
n r
)> C m m m r :L<
I Z Z Z
tT1 J> - [Tl
- ---170
J> J> J> r-
UJ I 0 '1
"- Z Z Z C)~
C'P :L(JJ
11= CJ ----1 ----1 ----1 m Zc
[Tl_
70,
D
~ Z Z
-
I 0
q0 ----1 ----1 ----1 )>
m m fT1 D
D
tV Z Z Z 70 tV
)> [Tl ,
~ 1 J> J> J> u"> 0
q u">
() Z Z z
------\ ------\ ------\
Z Il 3....
C ) 56 tV
0701
~ o C) <.fl
1170 D
::: [Tl
Il-1D
m or
f) Vi <.fl
Z Il 0
[Tlz
')>
---t fT10
<[Tl
~,
C)
z
UJ (\-1lJ)>lJ
- C)[Tl',70
.0 <z)>cC)
u"> u"> ,(JJu"> [Tl)>-13<
-1 -1 =:jfT10 7OZfT1--
Z -1U">ZD
C) C) -Z :L . C[Tl
Z Z Z)> -Z703
[Tl [Tl -10 J=!~C)z~
fT1[Tl
70 c)>c
Z-1 )>[Tl-13U">
)>C) (\)>C)[Tlr
, 70z ,[Tl
, ~DC D
~ , -1
(\
tV
tV
tV 1
1 G"
tV
INSPECTOR
DATE /0 Jo PE1'MI NO. 3'-9"
o ACCEPTED A ~ SUBMITTrrJ
00 ACCEPTED 'v\iTH CORRECTIOt\,C' S N
tJ NOT ACCEPT D-COHRECT & HESU8MlT
These comments are ~ f your InfomJation All work shall be done
in full compliance with II applic.ahla buirding & zoning code re-
quirements incfuding items not specifically noted in this review.
KEEP THIS PLAN <::;::-T Of" c;r:f" .1\ T AI t TIMES.
o 2006 TU5HIE,MONTGOMERY . A5S0CIATES, INC,
I hereby certify that this plan, specification. or report was
. prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer un er the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
l'
2'-011
"0
I
Lfl
,--"-------
i
L..]
1
!
!
!
i
i
i
!
'I
"'''1 BY SIGNAGE
V CONTRACTOR
,mJ
!
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
FABRIC FLASl-HNG
TO COVER TOP OF
MASONRY
PREF, MTL, FLASI-lING
PRECAST CAP
STONE
2-811 CMU-GROUT SOLID
1211x811 BOND BEAM W
(2)#5 CONTINUOUS
1211 CMU,It-J/ #5
VERTICAL
@ 4'-011 O,C,
+*5 2'-011 DOIt-JELS
@ 4'-011 O,C.
30l1x1211 CONe. FOOTING;
W 2#5 CONTINUOUS
BLDG. MONUMENT
@~l~~B" ::,~,~TION
Changes By:
Dote:
10/12/0~
a
I
F--
z
L
o
I
~
- --I}-
T U S HIE
MONTGOMERY
ARCHITECTS
ASI #2-REVISED DETAIL-VILLAGE COMMERCE BUILDING
Project Number: 20~115A
L2.1
1
SHEET AFFECTED
EXHIBIT NO.
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Special Inspector Daily Report
City of Prior Lake
Page
of
Report Number:
Project Name:
Date of This Report: 10-3-06
Prior Lake Office Bldg
Project No.:
BLOS-44S6
Project Address: Prior Lake, MN
Client: Client Project No.:
Weather: Temperature:
Inspection Coverage:
02 Masonry rzl3 Rebar Placement 04 Foundations
06 Welding 07 Concrete Placement 08 Fireproofing
09 Bolting 0 I 0 Tendon Placement rzl I I Other
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 012 (Listed Below) No rzlI3
Type of Inspection:
o I Continuous
rzls Periodic
Description and location of work completed: - Observed the placement ofrebar for piers @ Grid A-7, .9-7.1, A-6, A-5
A-4, A-3 and footings @ Grid B-1 to C-I to C-2 to D-2 to 0-6. The reinforcement appeared to be placed in general
accordance with approved plans.
- Performed 1 compaction test on water main backfill and I wIIIpaction test on sanitary sewer backfilL
- Collected a sample of the soil for proctors.
List tests performed:
. Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations?
. Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes
. If yes, see attached Summary Sheet.
Yes 014 No rzllS
DI6 No rzl17
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and
applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above.
Signed: . /--?? ~
//.,/' .-
Print Full Thomas R. Loosbrock
Date: 10-3-06
I.D, Number:
1136593-49
Name:
(White copy to Braun Intertec file, Blue copy to General Contract01)
ep-eng\sys\frm\specday1
Page _' of ~
BRAII'N
INTERTEC
SIDRPT
SpeciClI Iflspedion Daily Report
Report No.:
Project Name:
Project Address:
Client:
Weather:
city of
S'1v- u (' h.u 0.. ( <; f.eo ~ tt ,
V. ,\ et~O ('o~~/to
<//J.-q ?()r~
G re~ "k>~
'v,^",")
PI',..u l CJ..J(J2
Date of This Report:
6u" \ c\\",.> Project No.:
N;,c.)\u.r Av-p.
/1- 50' UIo
Be.. - ~ (" -- d/\( \to A
'5. t ,.
Client Project No.:
Temperature: I tJ 0 F
Type of Inspection:
o Continuous
llr Periodic
Inspection Coverage:
o Masonry
4- Welding & Bolting
o Piles & Piers
o Rebar Placement
o Concrete Placement
o Tendon Placement
o Foundations
o Fireproofing
o Soils
o Special Cases
Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (listed Below) No 0
~ription and location of work completed:
~r Jb,<:;"t r,\~t lA:e\~~ cd- Z.,j1 [:'1tA;)/
CV 1-' \l. A - .<.\ 0 c:I", v'(~ \At:) ~.....J
~o..\!v\. r-I~v.~o {"'\lQt we\J\ G..:~
c. ",J (ko.. \^~ f F,J\.of-s _ I 5/<;t-, d I<q
)
C r,' ~
A-~
A-D ?)'- IOr'-..
f-.J J J qt ~~lA~ I/-~
List tests performed:
· Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 No .121 L S" E 11I5 \,-,\~ f ~
· Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No 1::) 2.;)0 <;. f.IV... 0.' ~ "-' t .
· If yes, see affached Summary Sheet. L f? CUE v..r ,^"..,J ~
SO">, ph -;- ~ {,l ~ o~
To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications ana applicable
workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. 1'V\ V ISv ~ 0.. n '0. ( r f'
r--
Signed:
~
to.... '^- -..i ~
Date:
I r - ~Gh,X::::>
t ~")(r c;.)'7 )'- 'Be.
Print Full Nome:
~rGrtk\",-
1.0. No.:
White copy to Broun 'nter1ec fi'e. B'ue copy to Pro;ect Site Representative.
Jan 03 07 11:53a John
iAl L t I v '-'F Ib--z.-. 4T /;vs. t;) [I / _
/....----........ e.- / Its _ ~ ,f
~.~. ___/ 1:>630 Wl\~('MI"'c.1J'do ~ Mlnnc~obt:, MN SSH'I.)785 - (000) l106-n~::! ~ (763) 559-3266 - r.....(763) 559-0045
11m (".rnospoitlt "'lI<'l\uto -llnJ1'ltcm. TX nor,4.\)'n7 ft (000) 1'16-<17.11 - an) 7<)(,.<)741" r<l'<(71l17~l).1 110
W"'~~ht: I t/VW'IA. f"""Qu"""*'I})rI!l.I4,('O'"
Prc>duct
Description
~
(l)
Q)
~
00
~
~
C'\S
Q
CredentialS
~
c:'d
u
.~
t::
~
C,)
(l)
H
00
(l)
.~
$-I
Q.)
rJ:J.
Proccssin~
Parameter's
00
V)
,.......l
Physical
Properties
(Liquid
product)
~
U
V,Au~ ~j:;-
0./
b
vVlA ( (.,
'1
t;J$
320-236-5602
p.2
z{,
/Ir :>
: CI<' 158 j~ a closed coil spray applied foam. which when in:o;tallcd
: following application guidelines adheres tenaciously 10 framing
members and substrates, providing superior energy economy and
. durabilily while ~ignificanlly reducing unmanagcd moi~1ure and air
: infiltration.
, As a component of a "SYll1etnS approach" to proper building envc:lope
: construction in both residential and commercial construction, CF 158
, provides cxccp\ioll31 pcrfonnancc in reducing heat tran:,;fcr. m"i:;turc
. gain and improving racking load..,
. ASTM E-84 Class l(l) listed toam with Omega Point. Laboratories.
. ck c 4' aximu
Flame Spread (25)
: Smoke Development (450)(l)
oly"rcthanc foom systems mullt 00 protccu:d by a J S.minutc thermal blmicr or
: ignition barrier. dl.'pending on applicntion. Some COdCll ull(l"" (or lIpecifc exceplions,
, Check with yOl.lr local building code offlCial for final determination.
: (I) 171i... numericaJjlam(! .o:pr(~iJd rolin/{ i.'l not il1/<'ndcd 1(> r(1l(~cl
. hazards presented hy this or any other material under actual fire!
. conditions.
. Gusmer H203S: '6~mCi GAP gun, #2 Mixi~g.ChambCr. Prebeats and
hose I 250f' - 130"1". ^ minimum ~pray or working pressure of 1000
. psi. '
PROPERTY TF.ST .FE 800 CF 153
Mix Ratio By Volume 1.0 1.0
Specific ASTM'1)..1638 t .22- t .25 I. 17-l.l9
Gra~\y'
Viscosity Brookfield 150-250 800-1300
(cps) RVr'
I'ngc I ()f:l
"'"
Jan 03 07 11:53a
John
320-236-5602
p.3
;;! 1-'0''''''
-I'~,""TI;l(rR'S'-;S I.I,C'
~
C1)
Q.)
....c:
r:.n.
~
~
~
o
,.......c
ro
u
. ....-l
d
...c
u
(])
~
00
Q)
.~
~
(1)
rJJ
00
V')
,..-4
~
U
Physical PROPERTY TFAf)T TYPICAl.
Properties RF.S{lLTS
(.fe'inished Dcn.~ilY, core ASTM 1).1622
@2~ 2.\ 0-2.35
product) @4~ 1.88-1.W
Closed Cell Contcot (psi) ASTM D-6226 >9~1o
K-Factor. Initial ASTM C-518 0.155-0.170
Pcrmeancc (pcnns) ^STM E-96 2.91
~ermeability (penn inch) 2.99
Dimensional Stability (% Volume ASTM 0-2126
Change)
Dry Age 2H Days (I S8"F. Dry) '+-3.3 to i,8.2
Fr~e-14 Day (-20oF) -0.37 to -0.96
Surface Burning Ch:1rllctcri~tiClPI ASl'M F:-84
roam Thicknc.'lll 4"
Flame Sprea&J) 2S
Smoke Dcvclopmcnt<:\l 450
m These physical prQperty r~7.drs are typical for this mclleri(d os applied ar our
(/ltw:ll)pment/acWty ufllkr con/rolleel '''}nelltlons. 7;'(' filam and fY:.,uIICll1t
pJly.~icl(1 prQPllrl/".y can vary with chang(!.~ in Ih/:l appIIC/)I/t)n ptJrametcrs; i.(I,.
lempef'(JtUri!.(, IhiclcnC!S$. prQc(<)'sing equipment, miX head voriuliQnS, throughput,
c!/c, A.~ a rt!.yull. IheI.W! puh/i.\'hcd pmp(!nie.~ are u.'l(ff"f fi'f'eva[uolirm J{U;delines.
Plty.,'/t-.u/ prt>fH.'YlY "'f1C'cijl''tI/Jon:; .~,"Iultl bl! t!eJ(!,.",Jnetljhmt u,'luuI"rm1J<<:IJon
processed mater;al.
flI This T/IInzerlcol flame ,~prcad rafinK is 1101 inlerllJed ro rl2j1r!c/ Jur:a,c!.( presenled
by lhi.y or Imy <llhil" m(//('r/(JllInt!cf' "dulII jif'<! cllne/ltlons.
-
~
s...
CLl
=
CLl
Co?
=
Q
.....
-
~
E
~
cS
c
-
The recommended application and handling procedures tor the specific
product being used ~h()uld be known ~~nd followed by the foam
applicator. ^ small"test area" ofsprdY foam should he applied and
inspected prior to commencing the project. This simple, low-cost test
area can indicate inadequate adhesion. improper surface preparation
and/or need for primer. surtace contamination, improper substrate and/or
ambient temper~ture\ equipIllt.'nt malfunctions, material contamination,
or improper application technique. A simple visual inspection of a
sample cut from a test spray and periodic job samples can reveal
potential problems that may be due to one or more of the above
condition~.
I':\f.c 2 01'3
Jan 03 07 11:S3a
John
320-236-5602
p.4
~ I.'().-t/ltl
"1iii.""'Tt;~PR/SES l.U'
~
~
-<
U
The CF lSS should only be applied in 1" to 2"passes. Thi~ application
: procedure is in compliance with the SPFA foam application guidelines.
: The CF 158 is tIDI for use as an EXTBRIOR roof deck system due to
the light dcn.<;ity of this product. The CF 158 shouJd tlQI bc used in
refrigerated strUctures or where rapid change in temperature can occur.
: CF 158 is to be applied to wood stud-wall surfaces between 400 f to
. 12()o.... Foam Enterpriscg' technical service personnel should be
consulted in all cases where application conditions are questionable.
. Thc use of foamed plastic in interior applications on walls or ceilings
: llUly present an ~nrcasonllblc: fire hu;'.ard unless the foam I:; protected by
: an approved, fIre-resistant thennalbaxrier which has a fInish--rating of not
le~ than IS minutes, or an igntition ba.rrier, depending on application.
. Specific applications may be allowed by code. check with your
: local building coda official for final determination.
; As with any airtight building envelope systom approach, adc:quatc
. ventila~i<>.n. strategies must be ~~idered.
...;...>
Q)
(I)
..c=
r/J
cd
~
o
z
o
-
..........
cd
u
. ........
C
~
<:.)
(I)
~
rJ':)
(I)
.~
H
ct)
r/1
00
V)
,.....1
~
Z
~
~
-<
a:
: The infonnatlon herein is'to'asSisi"customers in det~nnining whether our
. products arc suitable t()r their applications. Our prodUCts are intended for
i sale to industrial and commercial customers. We request that customers
, inspect and test our PrOOucts beflm: use and satisfy themselves as to
: contents and suitability. We WaIT'dIlt that our products will meet our
, written liquid component specifications. Nothing herein shall constitute
any other warrnot)'. CXpTC!'l:; or implied. including any war:ranty ot'
: merchantability of fitness, nor is protection from any law or palent to be
: inferred. All patent rights are reserved. The exclusive remedy for all
. proven claims i~ replacement of ()ur materials and in no event shall we be
,.!!~~J.c.tbr special, inc~~~!.~r consequential d~.&cis._..
~
U
Shcltlifc
Three months from date of manufaclurc when stored in
original, unopened container (SQ-750F).
Additional Information
, Created on: 0622OS(SW/my)
Revised on: NA
Revision #: NA
Page: ~ of3
F\L-t::
\J l LL~ 6- G"", /V\ . \ Ilf /01
~'L*~ (~ Cr~\ \ ~-- ~3 4
J
CA../(~ _\$ fJL-~~ AllJ2- lCD~o E~~,--7Z-?
~.~ F!~ rLEQ,O (.'V I~u-
C 1\,--,,--, ;;:D I (, (0 '1
:"\
I'S f-
- '1..- ,'\0 If
800
#-f
4'1 4 #{
'z. ,>10 J--..
- It.-
f'14- ~l
<CsUQ - tt'l..
756;
.:'D~4:
I ()1 rc '7~~' CAN W--''^-- 0<:':
C>
C--' c) V
4"7
'-.-Jut:--
(2~Q. 0
~ G 44-
i 1'7 y: '7 )
S; 7 7, ')- P-::00
C'V\J ~v,-~..s-
Village Commerce
Required items for completion (list may not be complete)
Building final
Electrical final
Plumbing final
Fire Sprinkler final
Fire Alarm final
Elevator final
HV AC final & Balance report
Planning Department signoff
Engineering Department signoff
Guard rails and hand rails (Roof top units within 10' from edge)
Handicap accessibility
. Parking lot & site approach (1/20 max. slope)
. Grab bars and hand rails
. Public rest rooms
. Signage parking lot, site approach, elevator, restrooms, etc.
. Access
Final grade inspection
As built for utilities
As built for grades and pond
Exterior lighting
Fire caulk & fire dampers
Landscaping
Final lift of asphalt
Fire Department Lock Box
Page 1 of2
Paul Baumgartner
From: Paul Baumgartner
Sent: Tuesday, March 13,2007 1 :15 PM
To: 'Ken Bryant'
Subject: RE: Village Commerce Elevator Equipment Room
I have not herd from the State Fire Marshals Office RE: the requirements for the sprinkler. I contacted him this
morning, I will still need approval from the Architect for the fire protection of the bar joists,
From: Ken Bryant [mailto:KBryant@greystoneconstruction.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11:50 AM
To: Paul Baumgartner
Cc: Gordie Schmitz; andyk@tmiarchitects.com
Subject: FW: Village Commerce Elevator Equipment Room
Paull think we are all in agreement here, We are proceeding with your idea, I will copy you on correspondence
with sprinkler contractor
Ken Bryant
Project Superintendent
Greystone Construction Company
Phone: 952.496.2227 Fax: 952.445.4191
'N"W'N,g[~y?tQn~~Qn$t[lJgtiQ[t~Qm
From: Andy Krenik [mailto:AndyK@tmiarchitects.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12,20075:14 PM
To: Ken Bryant
Subject: RE: Village Commerce Elevator Equipment Room
Ken-
Yes, what they are suggesting looks good, I have also attached some assemblies from National Gypsum and
USG--they are all basically very similar.
Andy
ps-for the record-the equipment rooms I have done recently have had precast lids so the rating has been inherant
to the floor ceiling structure thus no spray protection needed,
From: Ken Bryant [mailto:KBryant@greystoneconstruction.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12,2007 1:08 PM
To: Andy Krenik; mhouser@choiceelec.com; Todd Friedges
Cc: Gordie Schmitz
Subject: FW: Village Commerce Elevator Equipment Room
Andy, We need your Okee Dokee on this
Todd Please get costs to Gordie
Mark please get costs to Gordie
Paull will have sprinkler contractor visit site to rearrange sprinkler. He will know what is required, Possibly a side
wall head.
3/13/2007
Page 2 0[2
Ken Bryant
Project Superintendent
Greystone Construction Company
Phone: 952,496.2227 Fax: 952.445.4191
www.greystoneconstruction.com
From: Paul Baumgartner [mailto:PBaumgartner@CityofPRIORLAKE.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12,2007 11:25 AM
To: Ken Bryant
Subject: RE: Village Commerce Elevator Equipment Room
Ken I found several assemblies that will work, Bob and I agree (1) layer of 5/8" FIREBLOCK type C, 5/8" FI-ROK,
5/8" Plus, FireBar Type C or equal will be acceptable, Several companies make this type of rock, Send me a
measurement on the top to bottom depth of the joists and the spacing, This afternoon I will look up the Sprinkler
requirements. All modifications must be approved by the Architect.
From: Ken Bryant (mailto:KBryant@greystoneconstruction.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 20077:22 AM
To: Paul Baumgartner
Cc: Gordie Schmitz
Subject: Village Commerce Elevator Equipment Room
Paul I spoke to the architect after you left on Fri. He said he had heard of fire proofing the ceiling of a equipment
room in a residential code but doing it on this building would be a new one on him also since our building
construction is of non combustible materials. Please don't forget to fax me the code section you are referencing
that says we have to do it. My fax # is 952-440-4543,
Ken Bryant
Project Superintendent
Greystone Construction Company
500 S. Marschall Road #300
Shakopee, MN 55379
Phone: 952.496.2227 Fax: 952.445.4191
www.greystoneconstruction.com
3/1312007
04/01/2007 23:55
55145410,718
DAKOTA PLBG M HTG
P;::;(:;E 02... 02
FRor.., : I ~ISRur1EHmL RESERRCH I tjC
FR>< HO. 7635713372
Apr. 02 2007 08:40~M P1
Instrumental Research, Inc.
7800 Main St. Fridley, MN 55432 763-571-3698
April 2, 2007
At1n: John Hanson
Dakota Plumbing & Mechanical
575 Minnehaha Avrnue
St. Paul, MN 55103
LABORATORY RESUL IS - WATER SAMPLE 66-07W
Water samples from ~ction site: Village COIll!1lercc. Ptior Lak;.e....M:'N' were submitted to
Instrumental Research laboratory 3lld tested llnder my supervision. The samples were collected
by Dakota Plumbing & Mechanical personnel.
EPA & MDH IRl Ana1ysis
Parameterlrvlethod Results Drinking Reporting Datl?
Water Limits Limit
(Total) Coliform Bacteria
9223 B. (:P-A) Method
Downstairs Drinking Fountain Absent Absent Absl".-nt 3/30/200i
Uostairs Drinkin~ FounJllin Absent Absent Absent 3/30/2007
These results meet Errvironmental Protection Agency (EP A) and Minnesota Department of
Health (MDH) standards for a safe drinking water source.
All analyses were performed using Stl;Qdard Methods fQJ. the Ex..amination of Water and
\~astewa.ter, 19th edition EPA approveld methodologies,
Report submitted by,
~~.~
SUZANNE MELCHIOR, LABORATORY SCTPERVISOR
SM/ch
Minnesota Department. of Health Certified Laboratory No. 027-003-130
RTU
Common Lennox TGA090S2BM1Y
Floor
First
First
First
First
First
First
Second
Second
Second
Second
Second
Second
Second
Common
PRV # 1
Common
Floor
First
First
First
Second
Second
Second
Common
Village Commerce Balance Report
Gopher Heating Sheet Metal
March 15, 2007
Design Measured
Descriptior (CFM) (CFM)
Vestibule 200
Lobby 200
Hallway 200
Hallway 200
Women 150
Men 150
ConferencE 225
ConferencE 225
Stair 200
Hallway 200
Hallway 200
Women 150
Men 150
Total 2450
Greenheck GB-08
Design
Descriptior (CFM)
Utility
Women
Men
Janitor
Women
Men
Total
Final
(CFM) % Design
225 212 106%
194 200 100%
208 208 104%
212 212 106%
150 150 100%
144 145 97%
219 219 97%
222 222 99%
206 206 103%
206 206 103%
209 209 105%
148 148 99%
142 142 95%
2485 2479 101%
Measured Final
(CFM) (CFM)
50 32
150 154
1 50 136
50 26
150 143
150 136
700 627
% Design
48 96%
154 103%
151 101%
49 98%
148 99%
142 95%
692 99%
/'