HomeMy WebLinkAbout072282
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
...."
MEMORANDUM
RE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC ACCESS SEARCH COMMITTEE,
BILL MANGAN, LAISON
FINAL SITE SELECTIONS FOR FUTURE
LAKE ACCESS SITE
JULY 22, 1982
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Please find attached a map showing the locations of 3 sites that
the committee has found as being feasible. Along with the map,
there is an evaluation of each site for your reveiw.
A formal presentation will be presented to you on Monday, July
26 at 8:30 P.M. Del Barber, from the Department of Natural
Resources, will open the presentation with a brief history and
update. Charles Smerick will then present our slide present-
ation which will be followed by a question and answer period.
cc: Mary Bonneau
Sharon Murr
Dan Borchardt
Charles Smerick
Darryl Hastings
Del Barber
(612) 447.4230
4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E.
P.O. BOX 359
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
..." .--.." .....-----..--.....,.--.-.-........
I
r..."...,.......
:::::::::::::::::::
...................
. . . . . . . . . .
..... ....
. . . . . . . . , .
....... ..
...................
......... .
.:-:-:.;-:-:-:-:.:-
L-r
~.
"
"-
..
~.
"
"
E
~ , :\
i~ . \
\
Iii
\ '\
"
II -
\,.: .~'"
I', .-/ < '"
~L_~--:\' '.< .-.-
/-.- ~\. ,/' ;.,' ~
~ .c
C...?". " r""~
~ . ~t"C:~ . .
\..r.-,
r "'
\..o~
(,"J'"
,\..c...
......
'1
(,0"
."
PR;
", '\, ",
(j
~:~.
..
!
"-
l
i
.
o'
+. ;
"
60""1'
.<
...
~
..
GO"
.<
...
~
:-- ----..-.--
/-
)
~"1
. ~'-~._..-.-.,-._...__.~-,.__.-r---------_._.
WEST AVENUE SITE NO I
PRO'S
CON'S
1.) If park used for parking area; 1.) Small parcel:
large area available. A. ) Turnaround design difficult.
2. ) Good water depth. B. ) Small number of parking
3. ) Good road leading into spaces.
(Co. Rd. 21 & West Ave.) C. ) If parking designed for par
4. ) Normal barriers surrounding lot. parking will be separated f
5.) Currently being used. access.
2.) Conflict with access to private
property if boat ramp developed
at this location.
3. ) Utility relocation;
A.) .-""'\
Water
B. ) Sewer (Sanitarv) > "'CLi t:l~
C. ) Storm Sewer
4. ) Located in residential area.
k area;
rom
~-"" '--'- "~'-"~--~""""---"""""""~'~~".'-'''''----r-- ,~-,,,,_.~.",.._,_.,~_.,.~_... >, ,',.. ..~..,.,..,._,"',_.~..",..."._.~-~,.-,~--,~.
k ~'-""-.-~'-"~'."'~""-"----~"~----r----'--'.--" ,-_..,,--_... _._._~.-._-._."
VISlaN._VlILPlWPERTY SITE NO. 2
PRO'S
CON'S
1.) Large area; allows design 1.) Cost for acquisition and
flexibili ty. development will be high.
2.) Direct access from County High- However, cost should be just-
way. ified by size of access (30-50
3. ) Discussions with people from cars).
Prior Lake indicates good water
dep th .
4. ) Discussion with City Engineer
indicates NO utility relocation.
S. ) Currently undeveloped.
6. ) Possibility of 2 ramps.
'.
" ....~....,. '-"-*'-""~'-".'"' ".,._.~..,-<~---,....,..-,.~..,_._._.~_. -. .-.--.-.,
LAKEFl1.ON'I- PARK SITE NO.3
PRO'S
CON'S
1.) Economic - zero acquisition cost. 1.) Lengthy and expensive road to
2. ) Large area available for parking. site; who pays; cost benefit ra
3. ) Access placed in park may compli- road/access bad!
men t park comprehensive plan 2.) Discussion with people from Pri
however, in this case location of Lake indicates bad water depth.
access road is not good. 3. ) Parking lot for access will be
4. ) Not removing property from tax located long distance from boat
rolls. ramp; may require sidewalk or
5. ) Undeveloped area. walkway; additional cost; safet
6. ) Close to businesses and City 4. ) Access road splits park; possib
emergency services. problem for pedestrian traffic;
7.) Total family experience. safety.
5.) Smallest turn-a-round of 3 si
tio
or
y.
Ie
tes.
I 6.) Dredging and continual maintenance.
I
I
:
I
I
I
I
--....m......."'--^-'''-_..~._'~~..''.~-~...'.'-T-....._'~-_.'...~