HomeMy WebLinkAbout111494
*PLEASE REVIE'ffOR MEETING OF 11/14/94*
PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AGENDA
MONDAY. NOVEMBER 14. 1994
7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes from meeting of 10110/94.
3.
Staff reports
A. Bill Mangan, Director
1. Terms of PAC members
2. Fall Project update
B. Bret Woodson, Program Supervisor
I. Fall Recreation Program update
2. Winter Program Brochure
,.,.
4. Other Business
A. Parks Advisory Committee Open Forum
5. Old Business
A. Review future land acquisition and development projects for Parks and Open
Space and recommend funding source(s). Please review staff report from
the July meeting. Discussion will continue on this item.
~ Review and discuss the Lake Access Study as prepared by the Lake Advisory
Y Committee (LAC). Please bring the copies of the report that were
distributed at the last meeting.
6. Establish next meeting date.
A. The next meeting is scheduled for Monday, December 12, 1994.
7. Adjourn the meeting.
**PLEASE--CALL TO CONFIRM YOUR ATTENDANCE! !**
AGNl1.WRT
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
~~
PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
OCTOBER 10,1994
The Parks Advisory Committee meeting was called to order by Chairman, Doug Berens, at 7:06
p.m. on Monday, October 10, 1994. Members present were Doug Berens, Sam Emond, Bob
Rykken, and Art School. Pat Heaney arrived at 7:10 p.m. and Kathy Smith arrived at 7:20 p.m.
Ron Ceminsky was absent. Staff members present included Bill Mangan, Director of Parks &
Recreation and Nancy McGill, Parks & Recreation Secretary. Lani Leichty was the guest
speaker for the Lake Advisory Committee. Tom Watkins and Jody Stroh were also present from
the Lake Advisory Committee.
At this time Doug Berens asked Lani Leichty to give a presentation of the Lake Access Study.
Lani indicated that the Lake Advisory Committee was directed by the City Council to look into
various accesses on the lake. This was originally prompted by a problem that arose at the Lord's
Street access last Fall; whereby it was discovered that there were a lot of discrepancies about the
various accesses. Nineteen accesses were reviewed. There are six classifications to categorize
each access; Scenic Overlook, Winter Access, DNR Public Access, Vacate the Access, Remain
as is, and Other.
There was some discussion regarding the meaning of the above classifications.
The DNR has Prior Lake on its priority list for adding more parking spaces. The Met Council
recommends the DNR to provide one parking space per every 20 acres of land; 57 spaces is the
ultimate goal for Prior Lake. There are currently 41 parking spaces available. The DNR does
own property on DeWitte & Kent and 10 more spaces could be added at this location.
As a review committee the LAC has identified and recommended Lakefront Park as a potential
third DNR public access site. This would utilize the gravel parking lot near the hockey rink.
Several issues need to be reviewed; Bass spawning bed, dredging the channel, wetlands. The
Committee felt that a third area is necessary given the growth of Prior Lake.
There was some discussion.
Pat Heaney felt that its always been difficult when trying to improve Lakefront Park.
At this time, Tom Watkins explained why the LAC have recommended Lakefront Park as a
potential site. The committee considered a location where a public access could be put that
would provide adequate space, wouldn't intrude on residential property, and hopefully improve
the useability of Lakefront Park.
Sam Emond felt that Lakefront Park is good location for a third access; however, topography
may be hard to work with.
Art Schoot was concerned about the current restrictions on the lake and allowing more people to
access the lake. Wasn't sure if it was necessary to add a third access.
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Bill Mangan indicated that some accesses are dangerous during the winter due to open water
areas.
Pat Heaney said that he would like to see some figures before anything was finalized; perhaps,
money could be utilized in other areas.
SAM EMOND MADE A MOTION TO TABLE THE LAKE ACCESS STUDY AND, AS A
COMMITfEE, DISCUSS AND STUDY THE REPORT BEFORE ANY
RECOMMENDATION IS MADE TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
Art Schoot suggested that the PAC walk the area. The committee were in agreement.
PAT HEANEY SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
It was stated that this study is in the preliminary stages; therefore, have time to discuss this
thoroughly before any recommendations need to be made. The Council will receive this study
for their review at the October 17 meeting.
The committee were in agreement that a master plan needs to be formed regarding what
Lakefront Park should look like and determine the use of it.
The minutes were reviewed from the September 12, 1994 meeting.
Art Schoot questioned the sidewalk segment of Candy Cove Trail south of Highway 13. He had
heard that this was going to be completed in 1995; however, it was listed on the priority funding
list as being done in 5-10 years.
There was some discussion on this; and it was unclear as to the status of this.
BOB RYKKEN MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 12, 1994 MEETING. KATHY SMITH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Doug Berens asked for Staff Reports.
Mangan will be attending the National Parks and Recreation Conference to be held Wednesday
through Saturday at the Minneapolis Convention Center.
Bill updated the committee on the Teen Program (programming for 12-15 year olds) that Bret
has been working on. Bret has met with Paula Teztlaff from Hidden Oaks Middle School and
they are working towards joint programming in the Spring and Summer with teen trips, dances,
etc.
The terms of the PAC members was discussed.
Kathy Smith questioned the terms; she understood that the original members could serve two
2-year terms effective with the by-laws adopted by the Council in May, 1994.
Mangan said that he would check into this to get it clarified.
Parks Advisorv Committee Minutes - October 10. 1994 - Pal!e 2
...........'~_.,_._~..."._.",."__..._..........~.~'__"~.".__._____.,_~'__.___..m..'....".~__,_.,___
Mangan gave a brief summary of the STS program for Al Friedges, Parks Supervisor. Their next
project will be working on pouring concrete for the five shelters. He then distributed a report
showing the number of hours that the City has used the program. The county felt that too many
hours were spent in our city.
Work program for the fall includes construction of five picnic shelters; Boudins Park, Sand Point
Park, Fish Point Park, Raspberry Ridge, and Willows.
Doug Berens asked for Old Business.
Kathy Smith commented on the agenda, and requested that if there is a guest speaker, members
of the committee should be notified if the order of the agenda changes.
Mangan indicated that he had spoke with Chairman, Doug Berens, regarding the change in the
agenda due to conflicts that the speaker had, but said that he would note Kathy's suggestion.
Berens suggested that guest speakers be first on the agenda. Mangan indicated that he would
have to check into the proper order to be followed.
Chairman, Berens, asked for Old Business.
Mangan updated the status of the sidewalk/trail for County Road 44. There was some opposition
to putting the sidewalk on the south side of Cty. Rd. 44. The council was tending to agree with
eliminating the sidewalk and just having a trail on the north side due to the dollars involved;
however, a comment was made regarding the lack of safety if the sidewalk is eliminated as
sidewalks/trails are not compatible. At this point, the Council voted to keep the 8 foot concrete
trail on the north side to Candy Cove Trail and continue with an asphalt trail from this point to
the High School; and a full sidewalk on the south side of Cty. Road 44.
Doug commented that a bridge installed over Highway 13 as a pedestrian walkway in the future
would be nice.
Berens asked if the committee wanted to review the future land acquisition and development
projects for Parks and Open Space and recommend funding sources.
BOB RYKKEN MADE A MOTION TO TABLE 5B, FUTURE LAND ACQUISmONS,
UNTIL THE NOVEMBER, 1994 MEETING. PAT HEANEY SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
Due to the daylight hours, it was suggested that each committee member take a look at Lakefront
Park on their own time before the November meeting in reference to the public access issue.
BOB RYKKEN MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. PAT HEANEY
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
Bill Mangan
Director of Parks & Recreation
Nancy McGill
Secretary
PACIOA
Parks Advisorv Committee Minutes - October 10. 1994 - Paee 3
AGENDA NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
5B
BILL MANGAN, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION TO BILL
MANGAN FROM P.L.A.Y. FOOTBALL, TOM REDDINGER,
DIRECTOR.
DECEMBER 5,1994
DATE:
BACKGROUND:
Tom Reddinger, Football Director for P.L.A. Y., will be in
attendance to present a plaque of appreciation on behalf of
P.L.A. Y. to Bill Mangan and the Parks Maintenance staff for all of
the maintenance and preparation for the football program this past
fall. In addition to Mr. Reddinger, other members of the P.L.A. Y.
Board of Directors may be present as well. Staff will introduce
those Directors who attend the meeting.
AGN9
REVIEWED BY:
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
'_._._--_._-'~.^.~".--~-_--._-.,--..........-~..._-_.......,"........."_._,<--'_"."~"_'_".~--""'"'-""-"~._",,,~~~,-,-,,--,,-,-,~-'--'-"~'--'~~~~.".._--".~",--".~*~-.~"-
AGENDA#
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
7(A)
BILL MANGAN, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DISCUSS PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDED FUNDING SOURCES FOR FUTURE PARK
AND TRAIL ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT.
DECEMBER 5,1994
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
This item is a result of a City Council directive to the Parks
Advisory Committee to research and recommend funding sources
for future park acquisition and development based on the five year
CIP and the proposed 2010 Comprehensive Plan. The PAC has
researched and discussed the different funding sources and
developed a recommendation to the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
Historically, the City of Prior Lake has funded Community Park
and Trail land acquisition and development from the General Fund
balance which has been matched with State and Federal grant
proceeds. While this may have been acceptable in the past, it is
becoming increasingly more difficult to acquire lands, much less
develop them. The Park Dedication fee that is charged at the time
of the building permit application is used for trail development
within the subdivision and the development of the neighborhood
parks. There is no funding mechanism for community parks
and the citywide trail system.
The CUlTent policy for acquisition of park land for the different
kinds of parks is as follows:
TOT LOTS; NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS;
10% land dedication or fee in lieu of land based on raw
land value of $8,000 per acre for Residential and $1 per
square foot for Commercial/lndustrial.
COMMMUNITY PARKS;
State and Federal Grants matched with General Fund
contribution.
ENVIRONMENTAL PARKS;
State and Federal Grants, General Fund, 10% Park
Dedication, donation, or Wildemess Easement (The Wilds).
TRAILS AND WALKWAYS;
Municipal State Aid, General Fund.
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
The current policy for development of parks and trails IS as
follows:
TOT LOTS, NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS;
$400 per building permit park dedication fee.
COMMUNITY PARKS AND PLAYFIELDS;
State and Federal Grants and contribution from General
Fund to match grant.
ENVIRONMENTAL PARKS;
$250 per building permit trail dedication fee.
TRAILS AND WALKWAYS;
Citywide Trail System-Municipal State Aid, Ad Valorem
taxes, General Fund contribution.
Neighborhood trails-$250 per building permit trail
dedication fee.
In reviewing the existing funding sources for land acquisition and
development, it is apparent that there is no ongoing mechanism to
acquire and develop land or to develop citywide trails and
community parks. As a result, this was the major focus of the
Parks Advisory Committee discussion.
DISCUSSION:
For the purposes of discussion, their are basically four methods of
raising funds for the purpose of acquisition and development of
park land. Those methods are as follows:
1. Park Bond Referendum.
2. Ad Valorem Taxes.
3. Impact fees on new development.
4. Franchise fees on public utilities.
Of these four methods, a successful Park Bond Referendum is the
most preferable since this would be approved by the voters for the
specific purpose of expansion or enhancing the park system. Ad
Valorem taxation is very difficult in a growing community because
there is so much demand for the tax dollar yet everyone wants to
hold the line on increased taxes. A franchise fee, while unpopular
to the residents, is an equitable method of raising revenue because
this is a tax that is uniform across the board. An example of this is
the $5 per billing period on the Sewer and Water bills for Capital
Facilities. An impact fee is what we currently use for the park
dedication fee for new building permits. This is the $650 that is
dedicated to the Capital Park Fund, $250 for trail construction and
$400 for neighborhood park development.
Attached for your review is a copy of the preliminary Parks and
Open Space portion of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. While this
plan has not been adopted, it does provide staff with a guide from
which to make future decisions based on certain standards. At the
top of the page is the future park sites inventory showing the open
space that is recommended for acquition by the year 2010. At the
bottom of the page is the Athletic Facility Need which shows the
various playfields, the number of existing fields, the local standard
necessary, the current facilities needed per population and the
facilities need by 2010 based on that population.
Given this information, the Parks Advisory Committee met at their
regular meeting of November 14, 1994, to discuss various
alternatives. This item has been discussed at the PAC at every
meeting since it first appeared on the agenda in July. After
considerable discussion, the following motion was made by Sam
Emond:
A motion proposing that future park acquisition and
development be funded by a Park Bond Referendum to include
at a minimum, those items listed in the five year Capital
Improvement Program and the proposed 2010 Comprehensive
Plan. Further, that any other funding sources not be excluded
to fund these projects. With a second to the motion by Art
Schoot, the motion passed unanimously.
In addition to the recommendation for a referendum, the PAC
requested that staff review the Park Dedication fee for building
permits annually in the event that those fees could be used to
supplement the monies acquired through the referendum. An
adjustment of the impact fees should be made annually so that
those fees can augment the development of the park system and the
city will not fall behind on development and have to "catch up".
ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council are as follows:
I. Accept the recommendation of the Parks Advisory
Committee and proceed with plans for a Park Bond
Referendum with the amount of the referendum and
the date of the referendum to be recommended by
the Parks Advisory Committee and determined by
the City Council.
2. Do not accept the Parks Advisory Committee
recommendation and send the issue back for further
research.
3. Table this item until the 2010 Comprehensive Plan is
adopted.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Alternative #1, accept the
recommendation of the PAC and proceed with plans for a Park
Bond Referendum in 1996 as reflected in the 1995-1999 Capital
Improvement Program. Based on the survey of 1990, the
community supported trails and walkways followed closely by
expanded and improved athletic facilities. With the number of
participants in P.L.A.Y., soccer, and hockey, there should be
enough support in the community for a referendum for these
improvements. In addition, safe trails and walkways were the
ACTION REQUIRED:
REVIEWED BY:
AGN8
number one priority of those respondents to the community survey
in 1990.
In the event that a Park Bond Referendum would fail, rather than
abandon the Parks and Open Space element of the 2010 Plan, staff
would recommend that this matter be referred back to the PAC for
further research. At that time, the PAC would revisit the use of the
other financing options and the possibility of paring back our parks
and trails aspirations and come back with another recommendation
to the City Council.
Depending on the discussion, a motion is in order directing staff
and the Parks Ad sory Committee on one of the three alternatives.
FUTURE PARK SITES INVENTORY
MAP I PARK NAME SIZE IN
KEY ACRES CL~SSIFICA nON EST. COST
I
A Pike Lake 50 Communitv Park/Plavfie1d ~ 500 000
B Knob Hill 12 Neiszhborhood Park Pk. Oed.
C North Shore Oaks I 5 Nei2hborhood Park Pk. Oed.
0 Vier1in~ Farm 30 Communitv Park 500,000
E Jeffers Ridsze - Environmental Open S oace Pk. Oed.
F Island View 40 Nei~borhood ParklEnvironmental 200,000
.G Koo Farm I 10 Soecial Use Park 200,000
H Cardinal Heiszhts 10 Nei~borhood Park Pk. Oed.
I BrooksvilIe Hills 6 NeisZhborhood Park Pk. Oed.
J I Marklev Lake .,- Environmental Open S cace 200,000
-=>
Community Trails 15Mi. Linear Park 400.000
TOTAL 188 $2,000,000
ATHLETIC FACILITY NEED
No. of existing Current Faciliites
facilities in Facilities Needed by
Programmed Community Parks Lool Need 2010
Plavfields or Plavfields S c:mdard (Poc. 11.482) (Poc. 20.200)
I I I
Softball I 8 II 1 000 I 11 I 20
Baseball I .. II3000 4 7
~
Soccer/F ootball I 4 1/4000 3 5
Hockev I 2 l/6000n 2 3
Ple:lSUre Sbtinsz* I 9 1/3000 4 7
Tennis* I 0 I 1/1500 8 13
*-This St:I.ndard is higher than typiol since the demand for hockey is offset by the indoor ice arena
* May be provided in either playfields or neighborhood parks
~ it
~n~l\ ~,{1,f;Ni~~"~;,:i~ri
~r'- "-' "",r. ".' ~. i', '" .. ~
...~.. 'r.;."':':a',,,,! ~i.II
. ~";~~~. ~
1995 CAPITAL BUDGET
and 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEl\1ENTS
.
I.Description and Location: Department: Parks & Recreation
Paving Lakefront Communi~ Park roads and parking Project Title: Park Paving
lots wIth concrete curb and l5ituminous surfaces. Project Number:
Project Useful Life: 25 Years
III.Needs Assessment: Medium
Priority Rankin~: 2
IV.CostJBenefit Impact Statement:
I1.Purpose: Tremendous benefit to community is equal to cost.
Paving access roads and parking lots for dust and This profect is contingent on the ~29 Improvement
Project. t will not stand on its own.
traffic control will enhance the Image of the park
system and provide better traffic control.
Project Financine: 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
I>>rooertv Tax
.>iect Levv 150,000.00
Enuinment Certificates
Soecial Assessments
Intere:overnmentaI
City MSA Funds
Canital Park Funds
Fund Balance
Grant/Contributions
Other!
TOTAL 150,000.00
Project Expenditures 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Construction{New) 150,000.00
RenovationsIRenairs
Land Acauisition
Buildine:s & Plant
Eauioment
Vehicles
L aer
TOTAL 150,000.00
CIP-14
""--.~'-~"".'~"""""""......~"~._"....-,,,.,...._-._........._-~------"---'"--'-"---~-'--"-"""""-"~~~-'~-'--------
1995 CAPITAL BUDGET
and 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEl\1ENTS
I.Description and Location: Department: Parks & Recreation
The Pond Athletic Complex-Irrigation Project Title: The Pond Complex Irrigation
Project Number:
Project Useful Life: 25 Years
ill.Needs Assessment: Medium
Priority Ranking: 2
IV.CostJBenefit Impact Statement:
I1.Purpose: By irrigation, turf wjll not require constant renovation
Irrigation of athletic fields p,rovides safe, ~a1ity, and It saves money In the long run.
lastInB turf. Irrigation will si~nificantly e ance the
c.ondi Qn. and appearance of he fields while reducing
nsk of Injury to users.
Project Financing 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
....
ooertv Tax
Proiect Levv
Eauioment Certificates
Soecial Assessments
Intere:overnmental
City MSA Funds
Caoital Park Funds
Fund Balance
Grant/Contributions
Other/(Referendum) 100.000.00
TOTAL 100,000.00
Project Expenditures 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Construction(New) 100.000.00
RenovationsIReoairs
Land Acauisition
Buildine:s & Plant
Eauioment
;hicles
Other
TOTAL 100,000.00
CIP-16
'--'<'~-_.'''''-'--'-'~--''''--''''''''~-~'~"'-"'''''~'~'~'~'----~~--,--~--_.~......_--~_.~,_.,."
1995 CAPITAL BUDGET
and 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEl\1ENTS
I.Description and Location: Department: Parks & Recreation
The Pond Athletic comp,lex L1flhtinft and Field Project Title: Pond Field Expansion
Expansion, inc1udinfcj 2 Softb Fie as, 2 Project Number:
Football/Soccer Fie s, 4 Tennis Courts.
Project Useful Life: 50 Years
I1I.Needs Assessment: Medium
Prioritv Rankin!!: 1
IV.Cost/Benefit Impact Statement:
I1.Purpose: Costs will provide adequate number of athletic fields
available to meet demand. There is currently a
To expand athletic fields to meet the demand from the shortage of pl~fields resulting in residents not having
community as identified within the master Parks access to play Ields.
Comprehensive Plan.
Project Financine: 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
..D.,.ooertv Tax
4 ..oiect Levv
Eauioment Certificates
Soecial Assessments
Interpoverntnental
City MSA Funds
Canital Park Funds
Fund Balance
Grant/Contributions
OtherHReferendum) 325,000.00
TOTAL 325,000.00
Proiect Exoenditures 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Construction(New) 325,000.00
RenovationsIReoairs
Land Acouisition
Buildine:s & Plant
Eouinment
:u...hicIes
~.her
TOTAL 325,000.00
CIP-17
'-_.........__....,,_.~--.-.-__.,._._~_......,-.._-------"'"">.-------...._.~_..-.~,~.._-----_._~'"~.__."._.~-~_.>.'~..~.._._.._._--~_._--~.,.."-~-~
1995 CAPITAL BUDGET
and 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVE:MENTS
I.Description and Location: Department: Parks & Recreation
Lakefront Park Land Acquisition and Entrance Project Title: Lakefront Park Development
Relocation. Project Number:
Project Useful Life: 50 Years
III.Needs Assessment: Low
Priority Rankin!!: 1
IV.CostJBenefit Impact Statement:
II.Purpose: Lakefront Park is currently under utilized for a variety
of r~asons. This ~rojec.t would proyide for the
pregare plans, identify those uses most compatible maxImum use 0 a major commumty park,
wit our largest open mace park and develop, those
facilities consistent wi our existing Master Plan or a
new one at City Council direction.
Project Financin2 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
loertv Tax
Proiect Levv
Enuinment Certificates
Soecial Assessments
Intere:overnmental
City MSA Funds
Caoital Park Funds
Fund Balance
Grant/Contributions
OtherHReferendum) 400 000.00
TOTAL 400,000.00
Proiect Expenditures 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Construction{New)
RenovationsIReoairs
Land Acauisition 400,000.00
Buildin2S & Plant
Enuinment
-
dcles
Other
TOTAL 400,000.00
CIP-18
FUTURE PARK SITES INVENTORY
MAP I PARK NAME SIZE IN
KF-: ACRES CL~SSIFICA TION EST. COST
i--- I
A I Pike Uke I 50 Communirv ParklPlavfield ~ 500 000
B I Knob Hill 12 Neiszhborhood Park Pk. Ded.
C I North Shore Oaks I 5 Nei2hborhood Park Pk. Ded.
0 I Vierfimz Farm I 30 Community Park 500,000
E I Jetters Rid2e - Environmental Ocen S oace Pk. Ded.
F I Island View I 40 Neiszhborhood Park/Environmental 200,000
.G I KOD Farm I 10 I Soecial Use Park 200,000
H . r Cardinal Hei2htS I 10 Neiszhborhood Park Pk. Ded.
I I Brooksvllle Hills I 6 I Neiszhborhood Park Pk. Ded.
J I Marklev Lake I 25 I Environmental Ocen S oace 200,000
I Communi tv Trails I 15Mi. I Linear Park 400 000
I TOTAL I 188 I $2,000,000
A THLETIC FACILITY NEED
No. or existing C urre:1C F J.ciliites
fudities in Facilities Needed by
Programmed Community Parks Loc:U Ned 2010
Plavfie!ds or P!avfields S cancfurd (Poo. 11.432) (poc. 20.200)
I I I I
Softball I 8 I III 000 I 11 , 20
Baseball I 3 1/3000 I 4 7
SoccerlF cocball I 4 I 1/4000 I 3 I 5
Hockev I 2 I 1/6000" I 2 I 3
PIe:lSUre S1ctinsz" I 9 I 1/3000 I 4 I 7
Tennis" I 0 I 1/1500 I 8 I 13
-arnis scndard is higher than typic:U since the demand for hockey is offset by the indoor ice arena
- May be provided in either playfie!ds or neighborhocd parks
~ .,
~h fe, ~ ~\ rX:\i~:~ir):"J('{
~f' ~ .~..:.::!i ~:...:l ;.~ ~l ~ ~ .~
<. ;'f:"';.~.,,"~~
~ . ~ ....--
,,rr-..,
1995 CAPITAL BUDGET
and 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVElVlENTS
.
I.Description and Location: Department: Parks & Recreation
Paving Lakefront communi~ Park roads and parking Project Title: Park Paving
lots wIth concrete curb and l5ituminous surfaces. Project Number:
Project Useful Life: 25 Years
ill.Needs Assessment: Medium
Priority Rankine:: 2
IV.Cost/Benefit Impact Statement:
ll.Purpose: Tremendous benefit to community is equal to cost.
Paving access roads and parking lots for dust and This proiect is contingent on the ~29 Irllprovement
Project. t will not stand on its own,
traffic control will enhance the Image of the park
system and provide better traffic control.
Pro,iect Financin2 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Prooertv Tax
Project Levv 150,000.00
Eouioment Certificates
Soecial Assessments
Interl!overnmentaI
City MSA Funds
Canital Park Funds
Fund Balance
Grant/Contributions
Other!
TOTAL 150.000.00
,~,
Project Expenditures 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Construction(New) 150.000.00
RenovationsIReoairs
Land Acnuisition
Buildinl!s & Plant
Eouioment
Vehicles
Other
TOTAL 150,000.00
CIP-14
1995 CAPITAL BUDGET
and 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEl\1ENTS
I.Description and Location: Department: Parks & Recreation
The Pond Athletic Complex-Irrigation Project Title: The Pond Complex Irrigation
Project Number:
Project Useful Life: 25 Years
ill.Needs Assessment: Medium
Priority Rankin2: 2
IV.CostJBenefit Impact Statement:
I1.Purpose: By irrigation, turf wjll not require constant renovation
Irrigation of athletic fields p,rovides safe, ~ality, and It saves money In the long run.
lastInfl turf. Irrigation will siO'nificantly en ance the
c.ondi IQn. and appearance of~he fields while reducing
nsk of Injury to users.
Project Financin~ 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Pronertv Tax
Proiect Levv
Eauioment Certificates
Soecial Assessments
Inter~overnmental
City MSA Funds
Canital Park Funds
Fund Balance
Grant/Contributions
Otherf(Referendum) 100.000.00
TOTAL 100,000.00
Proiect Exoenditures 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Construction{New) 100.000.00
RenovationslReoairs
Land Acauisition
Buildim!s & Plant
Eauioment
Vehicles
Other
TOTAL 100,000.00
CIP-16
1995 CAPITAL BUDGET
and 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEl\1ENTS
I.Description and Location: Department: Parks & Recreation
The Pond Athletic comp,lex L1flhtinft and Field Project Title: Pond Field Expansion
Expansion, includinfcj 2 Softb Fie as, 2 Project Number:
Football/Soccer Fie s, 4 Tennis Courts.
Project Useful Life: 50 Years
I1I.Needs Assessment: Medium
Priority Rankin!!: 1
IV.Cost/Benefit Impact Statement:
I1.Purpose: Costs will provide adequate number of athletic fields
available to meet demand. There is currently a
To expand athletic fields to meet the demand from the shortage of pl~fields resulting in residents not having
community as identified within the master Parks access to play Ields.
Comprehensive Plan.
Project FinancinlZ 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
ProDertv Tax
Proiect Levv
Enuinment Certificates
Soecial Assessments
Intere:overnmental
City MSA Funds
Caoital Park Funds
Fund Balance
Grant/Contributions
OtherHReCerendum) 325.000.00
TOTAL 325,000.00
Project Expenditures 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Construction(New) 325.000.00
RenovationsIRenairs
Land Acnuisition
Buildine:s & Plant
Eauinment
Vehicles
Other
TOTAL 325,000.00
CIP-17
1995 CAPITAL BUDGET
and 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
I.Description and Location: Department: Parks & Recreation
Lakefront Park Land Acquisition and Entrance Project Title: Lakefront Park Development
Relocation. Project Number:
Proiect Useful Life: 50 Years
ill.Needs Assessment: Low
Priority Rankin!!: 1
IV.CostJBenefit Impact Statement:
II.Purpose: Lakefront Park is currently under utilized for a variety
of r~asons. This !rojec,t would proyide for the
pregare plans, identify those uses most compatible maxImum use 0 a major commumty park.
wit our largest open mace park and develop, those
facilities consistent wi our existing Master Plan or a
new one at City Council direction.
Project Financing 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
- Pronertv Tax
Proiect Levv
Enuinment Certificates
Soecial Assessments
Intere:overnmental
Citv MSA Funds
Caoital Park Funds
Fund Balance
Grant/Contributions
Otherf(Referendum) 400.000.00
TOTAL 400,000.00
Proiect Exnenditures 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Construction{New)
RenovationsIReoairs
Land Acauisition 400.000.00
Buildinl!s & Plant
Enuinment
Vehic1es
Other
TOTAL 400,000.00
CIP-18
-.._"-------.~_._-'--~~..,-_.._,,-<----~"-<,,~,...,...,,",..,.....~.._-,."-,._.~,,.~'.,- - "',--."._._..','---"-"'--,-"------._~_..~
PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
November 7,1994
Current Members Date Appointed Term Expires Term Limit
~ Doug Berens 9/89 (9/94)9/96 9/96
~ Ron Ceminsky 11/90 (9/94)9/96 9/96
Sam Emond 4/93 9/95 9/99
, Patrick Heaney 9/89 (9/94)9/95 9/96
~ Robert Rykken 4/93 9/95 9/99
Arthur Schoot 9/89 (9/94)9/96 9/96
~ Kathy Smith 9/89 (9/94)9/95 9/96
Annual Committee/Commission evaluation due to the City Council annually by:
August 1
Proposals for bylaw changes due to the City Council by:
December 31
Recommendation for Chair due to City Council annually by:
August "
COVER3. WRT
,1994.
,1994.
,1995,